Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1 of 7
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
Login | Register
Previous in Forum: project Next in Forum: Should I manufacture Mechanical Power Presses or Hydraulic Power Presses
whitepiper
Member
03/07/2008 11:01 AM
I have been struggling to get some guidelines for allowable nozzle loads for equipment to ensure it is not overstressed
due to connected piping? does anybody has some easy method to check that? WRCs are very tidious..
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Join CR4, The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion!
#2 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/09/2008 8:36 PM (score 5)
#7 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/12/2008 2:31 PM (score 5)
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:
Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
#6 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/12/2008 1:46 PM (score 1)
Steve S.
Guru
#1
Every equipment OEM will have design load limits for his machine and it is often on the equipment data sheet, but a lot
of them just use zero load cause if a give a piper an inch he'll take a mile, and if you give him a pound, he'll assume it
is a anchor...
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#2
Nozzle standard loadings are varied from equipment to another, also from material to another, also from
nozzle size and rating to another.
For example, the max. allowable nozzle loadings for pressure vessels and shell-and-tube heat exchangers shall be as
follows:
A. For Carbon Steel:
= K x 75 x D
where, K = 1 for Flange rating 150-300 and K = 1.25 for Flange rating > 600#
B. For Stainless Steel:
Force F = K x 675 x D , F = K x 1000 x D & F
A
= K x 1000 x D
= K x 50 x D , where, K= 1
D = Nominal nozzle size (inch), F = Force component (N) and M = Moment component (N-m)
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
2 of 7
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Go to Next Good Answer
Neville
Tomlinson
Active Contributor
#4
In reply to #2
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#12
In reply to #4
Anonymous
Poster #1
#15
In reply to #12
I went through this handbook twice, but was not able to find the formulae that you listed above for the max.
allowable nozzle loadings for pressure vessels and shell-and-tube heat exchanger?
Can you please refer me to the page number or para number in the Piping Stress Handbook by Victor Helguero
M where I can locate this formulae?
Thanks
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#16
In reply to #15
Refer to Piping Stress Handbook by Victor Helguero M, Chapter 8 "Design Criteria for Allowable Loads,
Moments, and Stresses".
__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
rajachem
Participant
03/05/2012 2:07 AM
Hi Abel,
#18
In reply to #16
I need to calculate the "Allowable nozzle loads" for a pressure vessel and was looking into the forum and
referred the "Pipe Stress handbook - Second edition" by Victor Helguero, Chapter 8 "Design criteria for
allowable loads, moments and stresses" and could not trace out the formulas. Please help, is iam looking at the
right edition?.
rajachem
Participant
03/05/2012 2:26 AM
Hi Abdel,
#19
In reply to #18
Also iam dealing with the welded nozzles (BW) and not flanged ones for the pressure vessel. Please say
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
3 of 7
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
Anonymous
Poster
#5
In reply to #2
Thanks Abdel, for upto 6" or 8" nozzles the rules are fairly matching with the nozzle loads by API 610. but could you
suggest allowable nozzle loads for smaller pipes <2" directly welded to the columns/ equipment. Actually i was
working on a cryo system where MOC are SS or Al with small piping sizes welded to equipment nozzle directly. due to
transients (TAM) the nozzle loads are very high. MOreover how to transform these relations for Al. Could you suggest
the reference for these rules?
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#6
In reply to #5
Yes, my dear
I still doing my best to find that reference book, it was located on shelf of our company's library. The book may be
lost or may be they interchanged its location, but I still lookfor my hardcopy.
For small nozzles < 2" connected to equipment, it must be designed with no loads to be transmitted from piping to
vessel and vice versa, since the Al. nozzles are very weak connections.
Please send your e-mail, there are some data related to cast iron and aluminium nozzles and casing of pumps.
__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
No more "Almost" Good Answers.
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#7
In reply to #6
The following data are extracted from the same reference book:
I. DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ALL PUMPS
b. WITH CAST IRON OR ALUMINUM NOZZLES AND CASINGS ALUMINUM PUMP FORCE, MOMENT AND STRESS
LIMITATIONS
The following criteria shall apply for pumps with 4-in. discharge nozzles or smaller (suction nozzles may be larger).
The forces contained herein are considered minimum criteria and should be adjusted where the vendor has
experimental or test data permitting larger reactions.
Suctions and discharge nozzles shall be designed to withstand forces and moments from the thermal expansion or
contraction of piping. Piping reactions shall be computed in conformance with ANSI B31.3 : Petroleum Refinery
Piping, Section 319, "Code for Pressure Piping", and shall be designed within the limiting criteria set by this
standard. The modulus of elasticity shall be adjusted for the operating temperature condition.
Each nozzle shall be capable of withstanding forces from external piping determined by the following formulas :
For suction nozzles : Frs 1.6 w 50 D
For discharge nozzles : Frd (2w - Frs) 50 D
Top suction and top discharge pump nozzles are further limited by :
2
2 1/2
a. Fxs 1.3 w 40 D
d. Fzs w 35 D
d. Fzd (w Fzs) 35 D
End suction and top discharge pump nozzles are further limited by :
2
2 1/2
2 1/2
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
4 of 7
a. Fxs 1.2 w 50 D
b. Fys 0.6 w 35 D
c. Fzs w 40 D
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
Anonymous
Poster
Dear Abdel,
now thats very useful guidelines, especially the stress control part at nozzle locations w.r.t. size of nozzles. thats
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
5 of 7
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#9
In reply to #8
Dear Guest/whitepiper
Thank you very much and you are welcome.
But for "thats very useful guidelines" & "thats a huge help", may be it is in need to a very huge rate of
score..... hahaha
__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#10
In reply to #9
My friends,
Do you know that 1 + 1 = 0.
That what was exactly happened to my posts #2 and #7, both granted score 1, "almost" Good Answers,
and the net score is zero. Can you please prove that 1 + 1 = 1 at least to be added to the total of Good
Answers. Nothing to say, just for fun.
__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
inspectorjoe
Associate
05/02/2008 10:17 PM
#11
In reply to #10
What about the nozzle thickness? Can you help on this? We conducted an ultrasonic thickness gauging of
nozzles of a pressure vessel. How do i compute if the nozzle thickness are still acceptable?
Anonymous
Poster
#13
In reply to #2
Abdel Halim
Galala
Guru
#14
In reply to #13
Rajcs82
#17
In reply to #2
Participant
12/04/2011 7:29 AM
I am doing stress analysis for natural gas plant which has part of under ground pipe and connected to above ground
equipment( pig launcher), i got output which has the code compliance of 40% of allowable stress and the vertical
displacements are with in 5mm but the force and moments are too large of 100000N at pig launcher inlet i really
surprise and need help to balancing this force and moments, please some experts can help me?
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
6 of 7
ronniehossain
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
Participant
06/05/2013 9:41 PM
Mr. Abdel,
#20
In reply to #2
I am facing a problem with a horizontal tank in my plant. Plant installed a two stage pump weighing approx. 2650 lbs
on the top of an 18" manway. My understanding is per ASME code vessel's nozzle is not designed for withstand this
load. How can I make sure that this load is ok or I have to add repad? Maybe 1" thickness of the shell will not allow
this extra loading. Thank you for your help. Ronnie Hossain
CR4 Admin, email address removed:
From the CR4 Rules: Do not post phone numbers or email addresses. The CR4 Admin will delete all phone numbers
and email addresses posted in threads or comments. You can share this information via the CR4 internal messaging
system.
joarder
Participant
04/16/2014 9:56 AM
Hi Abdel,
#21
In reply to #2
I have the book you referred but I can not able to find these formulas in Chapter 8. There is nothing for vessels in
chapter 8. What version you are referring to. Appreciate your help.
Lawrence
#3
Commentator
03/10/2008 8:55 AM
The WRC 107 method is tedious. However, it is the best analytic method available. The best way around the tedium is
to buy a canned program to read all of the tables for you or to go FEA. A recommendation for a program that does both
is FE/Pipe by Paulin Research Group (http://www.paulin.com/). This program is a parametric FEA program organized
around pressure vessels and piping. One can model the piping and the vessel in a linked analysis that both generates
the loads and analyzes the support stresses.
21 comments
Register to Reply
Back to top
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Join CR4, The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion!
#2 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/09/2008 8:36 PM (score 5)
#7 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/12/2008 2:31 PM (score 5)
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:
Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
#6 "Re: allowable nozzle loads" by Abdel Halim Galala on 03/12/2008 1:46 PM (score 1)
Copy to Clipboard
Users who posted comments:
Abdel Halim Galala (8); Anonymous Poster (4); inspectorjoe (1); joarder (1); Lawrence (1); Neville Tomlinson (1); rajachem (2); Rajcs82
(1); ronniehossain (1); Steve S. (1)
Previous in Forum: project Next in Forum: Should I manufacture Mechanical Power Presses or Hydraulic Power Presses
You might be interested in: Electronic Loads and Load Banks, Nozzles, Air Blow Guns
"The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing." -- Walt Disney
All times are displayed in US/Eastern (EDT) (Register to change time zone)
2014 IHS.
No part of this site may be copied, transmitted or stored, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of IHS.
The information contained on this site is by users for users and is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute
advice. Any views or opinions expressed by users are personal to them and do not represent the views or opinions of IHS. You
should check any information and use your own judgment or seek expert advice before doing or not doing anything on the basis
8/26/2014 10:04 AM
7 of 7
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/18641/allowable-nozzle-loads
of what you read here. IHS does not verify or warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site and, to the
extent permitted by law, IHS shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense incurred by reliance on it or for any dealings you
have with users or other third parties that take place using or facilitated by this site.
8/26/2014 10:04 AM