Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
USA
Vol. 74, No. 10, pp. 4121-4125, October 1977
Chemistry
4122
--
~G
Quench
chromatography.
Competitive Thallation of Benzene and Substituted
Benzenes. The thallations were carried out with exclusion of
light, in a manner similar to that for the mercurations. The
reaction mixture was quenched in aqueous sodium chloride,
and the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure until
a white solid remained. The bromination of arylthallium
chlorides was performed with bromine in carbon tetrachloride
according to the procedure described by Wright (13). Product
bromoarenes were analyzed by gas/liquid chromatography as
in the case of mercuration.
Analytical Procedure. All products were analyzed by gas/
liquid chromatography, with a Perkin-Elmer model 900 gas
chromatograph equipped with a hydrogen flame ionization
detector and either open tubular capillary columns or a packed
column. Peak areas were calculated with the Infortronics model
CRS-100 electronic printing integrator.
Characteristic retention times of bromo compounds along
with type of column and conditions are listed in Table 1. Authentic samples of pure substituted bromobenzene isomers were
available in our laboratory from previous work. A 12-ft 4,4'azoxyanisole-packed column was utilized at 1300 to achieve
complete separation of bromotoluene isomers (14).
Bromo compound
Bromobenzene
o-Bromotoluene
m-Bromotoluene
p -Bromotoluene
o-Bromoethylbenzene
m -Bromoethylbenzene
p-Bromoethylbenzene
o -Bromoisovronvlbenzene
15
15
21.3
23.7
23.3
26.6
30.0
30.2
32.5
37.4
14
13
11
10
10
8
* Concentrations: total
71.8
68.7
68.8
64.7
60.9
60.1
57.4
50.0
6.9
7.6
7.9
8.7
9.1
9.7
10.1
12.6
gas/liquid chromatography.
Hg(OCOCF)
+
Hg(OCOCF3)2
riiiaq.NaBr
Br
HgBr
Br,
min CHC1.
Because the mercuration of benzene and alkylbenzene in
trifluoroacetic acid is fast, it was considered necessary to use
a flow-quenching apparatus (12) to allow proper mixing of the
reagents before reaction.
The relative rates and isomer distributions in the competitive
mercuration of toluene and benzene at 220, summarized in
Table 2, show the variation of the data with reaction time, as
well as the difficulties one can encounter due to the lack of kinetic control when intermolecular and/or intramolecular
isomerizations affect the data.
CH3
CH3
CH3
etc.
~~~~~~H
~~
__
HAHgOCCF3
X+
HgOCCF3
0~~~~
HgOCCF,
0
4123
ArH
kArH/kB
Benzene
1
Toluene
18
20.6
6.4
73.0
Ethylbenzene
15
2.3
3.5
94.2
14
Isopropylbenzene
5.4
0.6
93.9
tert-Butylbenzene
10
0
8.4
91.6
Fluorobenzene
0.24
27.6
0.2
72.2
Chlorobenzene
0.03
27.3
0.1
72.6
Bromobenzene
0.2
18.7
1.7
79.6
Anisole
0.2
860
18.8
81.1
* Concentrations: total [ArH], 1.0 M; [Hg(OCOCF3)2], 0.1 M.
served at 220 (kT/kB = 18; 17.4% ortho, 5.9% meta, and 76.7%
para). There was no significant variation of kT/kB and only a
small variation of the isomer distribution (particularly of the
ortho/para ratio) with reaction times of up to 60 min, when
kT/kB = 18 with an isomer distribution of 25.6% ortho, 7.7%
meta, and 67.2% para.
Consequently, in further studies the mercuration of monosubstituted benzenes with mercuric trifluoroacetate in trifluoroacetic acid was carried out at 00 in order to minimize the
possible effect of isomerization (disproportionation) on the
isomer distributions and kT/kB, and the competitive experiments were performed with the shortest feasible reaction times
(2 sec). The data obtained are summarized in Table 3.
In the mercuration of monoalkylbenzenes, a decreasing order
of the relative reactivities (Me > Et > i-Pr > t-Bu) was observed, accompanied by an increase of meta substitution and
a decrease of ortho/para isomer ratio.
The mercuration of polymethylbenzenes was also studied
by the competitive method with reaction times of 2 sec at 00.
The data were compared with the relative stabilities of
the corresponding ir- and a-complexes in order to show a
comparable trend indicative of the rate-determining step (16).
The relative mercuration rates and corresponding ir- and
a-basicities of benzene and methylbenzenes are shown in Table
4.
The rate of mercuration of polymethylbenzene was so fast
that competitive mercuration of polymethylbenzenes and
benzene could not be directly evaluated. Therefore, the competitive mercurations of 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-dimethylbenzenes
were measured against toluene, those of 1,2,3-, 1,2,4-, and
1,3,5-trimethylbenzenes against 1,3-dimethylbenzene, and
those of 1,2,3,4-, 1,2,3,5-, and 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzenes and
pentamethylbenzenes against 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene. From
these data and the kT/kB value, the relative reactivity of each
polymethylbenzene with respect to that of benzene was obtained. It is significant to note the low reactivity of 1,4-dimethylbenzene and particularly of 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene.
An unsubstituted ring position para to a methyl group seems
to be necessary in order to achieve high substrate reactivity.
The correlation coefficient between the logarithms of the
relative mercuration rates and the logarithms of the corresponding ir- and c-basicities of methylbenzenes is 0.82 for
ir-complexes and 0.89 for a-complexes.
In an attempt at more quantitative treatment of the results
on monosubstituted benzenes, both the Hammett-Brown c++p
linear relationship and the improved multiparameter Yukawa-Tsuno relationship (17), taking into consideration both
conjugative and inductive effects of substituents, were used.
The Hammett-Brown treatment gave a p value of -6.31 and
4124
Chemistry:
Olah et al.
ArH
Benzene
Toluene
1,2-Dimethylbenzene
1,3-Dimethylbenzene
1,4-Dimethylbenzene
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1,2,3,4-Tetramethylbenzene
1,2,3,5-Tetramethylbenzene
1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene
Relative
Relative 7r-complext
mercuration stability
with HCl
rates*
1
18
335
362
41
1.0
1.5
1.8
Relative
a-complex$
stability
with HF-BF3
Time,
min
10
15
15
2
3
60
25
25
50
50
73
73
73
73
73
3
60
3
60
30
60
180
360
1440
kT/kB
34
35
34
33
33
Isomer distribution, %
Para
Ortho
Meta
8.8
9.5
9.0
9.1
9.7
9.3
10.6
12.6
12.2
15.0
19.6
25.8
28.6
5.1
5.5
5.7
5.9
5.8
6.2
7.5
7.8
8.3
10.7
17.0
27.2
86.1
85.0
85.6
85.0
84.6
84.6
81.9
79.7
79.4
74.3
63.4
47.0
25.4
1.6
1
7.9 X 102
7.9 X 103
106
3.2 X 103
2 X 104
2.4
2 X 106
1 X 103
2.2
2 X 106
5.7 X 104
2.6
6.3 X 108
2.3 X 105
2.6
2 X 107
1.35 X 105
2.7
2 X 109
67
2.8
107
the reaction was carried out up to approximately 60% completion. There was no significant variation in the isomer distributions observed, and thus there is no evidence for diarylthallium compounds.
No significant variation of the relative rate and of isomer
distributions of thallation with time was observed at 15.
Therefore, under the experimental conditions used, isomerization and disproportionation of the isomeric reaction products
in the thallation of toluene may be considered insignificant.
In order to study further the influence of reaction temperature on the isomer distribution, the competitive thallation of
toluene and benzene was also carried out at higher temperatures. The relative rates and isomer distributions are summarized in Table 5.
At higher reaction temperatures, specifically at 730 (the boiling point of trifluoroacetic acid), a marked decrease in kT/kB
was observed and the ortho and meta isomers increased at the
expense of the kinetically favored para isomer. These results
mean that aromatic thallation under the more severe reaction
conditions is an increasingly reversible electrophilic aromatic
substitution, accompanied by rapid isomerization and transthallation.
Because no isomerization (transthallation) was apparent in
the thallation of toluene below 15', the thallation of substituted
benzenes was also carried out at 100 with reaction times of 2
min. The relative reactivities and the isomer distributions are
2,0
Organic Chemistry (Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA), and references quoted therein.
Mackor, E. L., Hofstra, A. & van der Waals, J. H. (1958) Trans.
Faraday Soc. 54, 66, 187, and references given in ref. 7, p. 241.
28
21
19
18
14
8
4
2
46.1
sible.
Thallation. The competitive thallation of benzene and toluene with thallium trifluoroacetate was studied in trifluoroacetic acid in a manner similar to the mercurations described
above. Thallated aromatics were isolated by precipitation with
summarized in Table 6.
aqueous sodium chloride, brominated in carbon tetrachloride
The results in Table 5 show that the relative reactivities of
to form the corresponding bromoarenes, and then analyzed as
the thallation of halobenzenes are in the order F > Cl > Br,
such by gas/liquid chromatography.
Br
TlCl2
Tl(OCOCF3)2
+
Tl(OCOCF3X3 [
Br,
G
aq. NaCI
(~
< Et < i-Pr < t-Bu. This order is the reverse of that of the
mercuration of the same monoalkylbenzenes. However, the
ortho isomer obtained in the thallation of ethylbenzene was only
0.6% and in the cases of isopropylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene, no ortho isomer was formed. These results indicate that
the thallation reaction evidently has larger steric requirements
and also seems to be in accord with Arnett and Abboud's (19)
Isomer distribution, %
Ar
kAr/kB
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Fluorobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Bromobenzene
Anisole
1
34
70
Anisole
90
200
0.14
0.03
0.02
270
1900t
Ortho
Meta
Para
8.8
0.6
0
0
4.5
1.8
1.6
8.0
14.0
5.1
2.2
2.1
0.5
0.1
0.9
1.8
0.1
0.6
86.1
97.2
97.9
99.5
95.3
97.4
96.7
91.9
85.5
*
Concentrations: total [ArH], 1.0 M; [Tl(OCOCF3)3], 0.1 M.
t Reaction temperature, -200.
4125
72,4461-4465.
7. Brown, H. C. & McGary, C. W., Jr. (1955) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77,
2300-2306.
8. Olah, G. A. (1971) Acc. Chem. Res. 4,240-248.
9. Henry, P. M. (1970) J. Org. Chem. 35,3083-3086.
10. McKillop, A., Hunt, J. D., Zelesko, M. J., Fowler, J. S., Taylor, E.
C., McGillivray, G. & Kienzle, F. (1971) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93,
4841-4844.
11. McKillop, A., Swann, B. P. & Taylor, E. C. (1970) Tetrahedron
Lett., 5281-5284.
12. Olah, G. A. & Lin, H. C. (1974) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 549553.
13. Maliyandi, M., Sawatzky, H. & Wright, G. F. (1961) Can. J.
Chem. 39, 1827-1835.
14. Dewar, M. J. S. & Schroeder, J. P. (1964) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86,
5235-5239.
15. Brown, H. C. & McGary, C. W., Jr. (1955) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77,
2310-2312.
39,2274-2286.
18. Kresge, A. J. & Brennan, J. F. (1963) Proc. Chem. Soc. London
215.
19. Arnett, E. M. & Abboud, J. L. M. (1975) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97,
3864-3865.
20. Brody, J. M. & Moore, R. A. (1970) Chem. Ind. (London),
803.
21. Brown, H. C. & McGary, C. W., Jr. (1955) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77,
2300-2306.