Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1
Wentling (1980): EVALUATION CIPP model (Finch & Bjorquist,
MUST DO MORE THAN : 1977) 2) Input evaluation
• just analyse the extend to which
a program had adhered to an 1) Context evaluation • Deciding what resources and
original plan • Whether or not to offer a strategies that will be used to
• OR attained its primary goals curriculum achieve curriculum goals and
and objectives • If so, what its parameters will objectives
• Therefore, curriculum be – including goals and objectives • This includes – the quality of
evaluation needs to go beyond • It includes- environment, the curriculum and syllabus,
the assessment of student students’ b/ground, school climate, students, teachers, staff, facilities
behaviour goals and objective of the and infrastructure
• It should include the overall curriculum
effect on students, teachers and • It involves analysis of goals and 3) Process evaluation
society needs in a specific education setting
• Goals should be reviewed and • Focuses on decisions associated
• The task of evaluating the revised periodically in relation to: with curriculum effects on students
curriculum involves a 1) the reasons for offering the • Whether the content is learned
COMPLEX PROCESS program by students
• A comprehensive evaluation 2) the intended target group • Involves the data collection
framework or model is 3) the content • Data is collected over a period
necessary to achieve a of time to detect strengths and
systematic, effective and weaknesses of the program
efficient evaluation As curriculum developers: • Process evaluation includes:
• CIPP model • Establish conducive learning teachers’ methods of teaching,
environment to promote a positive students’ performance /
learning climate achievement, the facilities used
• Monitor current trends and • Conduct professional
issues in education development courses to upgrade
• Responsive to latest innovation (teaching) skills of teachers
and development in education • Review students assessment
2
4) Product evaluation