K101-QC-PL.001 - Quality Plan - Rev 0 PDF

Code: K101-QC-PL.
001
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
DETAIL EXCAVATION AND U/G UTILITY WORKS
INDEX
MISION
VISION
INTRODUCTION
1.0.
OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

1.1.
Objective
1.2.
Application
2.0.
NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS
3.0.
DEFINITIONS AND TERMS
4.0.
5.0.
6.0.
7.0.
3.1.
Definitions
3.2.
Terms
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

4.1.
General Requirements
4.2.
Document control
4.3.
Inspection and Testing plans
4.4.
Record Control
FUNCTIONSAND RESPONSABILITIES
5.1.
Project Management Commitment
5.2.
Customers Approach Coordination with Fluor Canada Ltd.
5.3.
Quality Policy
5.4.
Quality Management System Plan
5.5.
Responsibility, Authority and Communication
5.6.
Direction Review
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
6.1.
Material Resources
6.2.
Human Resources
6.3.
Infrastructure
6.4.
Working Environment
PRODUCT REALIZATION
7.1.
Product Realization Planning
7.2.
Processes related to the Client
Page : 2 de 21
Code: K101-QC-PL.001
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
8.0.
9.0.
7.3.
Design y Development
7.4.
Purchases
7.5.
Production y Service Provision
7.6.
Monitoring and Measurement Equipment Control
Page : 3 de 21
ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

8.1.
Monitoring and Measurement
8.2.
Product Non Conformance Control
8.3.
Data Analysis
8.4.
Improvement
ANNEXES
K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process
K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits
K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing Plan
K101-QC-PL-PR-004 Acquaintance of Quality Plan Instructive
K101-QC-PL-PR-005 Quality Control Forms
K101-QC-PL-PR-006 Measurement equipment control and testing procedure
K101-QC-PL-PR-007 Personnel Training Program
K101-QC-PL-PR-008 Subcontractor Qualification
K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Reception of Material
K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Storage of Material and Equipment
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 4 de 21
MISION
Provide specialized industrial services, with excellence in safety, quality and productivity being part
of the sustainable development of our society.
VISION
Be the leading firm in industrial construction and assembling in Peru.
INTRODUCTION
MOTA-ENGIL PERU S.A. as part of a policy to satisfy the Customer has developed this Quality
Management Plan through strict compliance with the specifications and requirements of the project,
based on the guidelines of ISO 9001-2008.
The Quality Plan to be used in the Project will be checked by the Project Manager and approved by
Fluor Canada Ltd. before the application. Writing, control, emission, and filing of the present Quality
Plan will be responsibility of the project manager who will be in charge of announcing it at the
project directory (Document Control) and will distribute thereafter following a chart created and
adapted for the purpose of the work. The person responsible for the project will provide all the
resources for the application. Quality Chief of the work is in charge of updating, revision, control
and implementation of QP at work, as well as the Inspection and testing management plans,
instructions, forms and other quality documents required.
1.
OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

1.1.
OBJECTIVE
The Quality Plan (QP) to be used in the Project will be checked by the project manager (PM)
and approved by Fluor Canada Ltd. before the application. Writing, control, emission, and
filing of the present Quality Plan will be responsibility of the project manager (PM) who will
be in charge of announcing it at the project directory (Document Control) and will distribute
thereafter following a chart created and adapted for the purpose of the work. The person
responsible for the project will provide all the resources for the application. Quality Chief of
the work is in charge of updating, revision, control and implementation of QP at work, as well
as the Inspection and testing management plans, instructions, forms and other quality
documents required.
1.2.
APLICATION
The present Quality Plan has as objective to define a way to implement and perform the
Quality Management System (QMS), in the work, and is applied for:
Project: DETAIL EXCAVATION AND U/G UTILITY WORKS
Contract: A6CV-00-K101
Client / Supervision: Fluor Canada Ltd.
Engineering:
Fluor Canada- GMI
Contractor:
Mota-Engil Peru
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 5 de 21
1.2.1 Scopes:
CIVIL WORKS
- Pipeline earthwork
- Localized Excavation for pipeline anchoring.
- Reinforced concrete Pipeline
- Building ties and pipeline anchoring.
STRUCTURAL STEEL
-
Multi-plate tunnels Installation.
MECHANIC WORK AND PIPELINES

-
2.
Carbon Steel pipeline assembly, diameter equal to 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 y 36.

HDPE pipeline assembly, diameter equal to 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18,
20,24, 30, 42, 48 y 63.
PVC pipe installation with diameter equal to 4, 6, 8, 10 y 12.
Assembly of 3 waste water tanks
NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS

Quality Management System Requirements ISO 9001:2008
- Fluor Quality Manual
- MEP Quality Management System (internal procedures).
- Drawings, Specifications and Documents in accordance with the Annexes given by the
client
- ASTM
:
American Society for Testing and Materials
- ACI
:
American Concrete Institute
- ANSI
:
American National Standards Institute.
- ASME
:
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
- AWS
:
American Welding Society
- MSS
:
Manufactures Standardization Society of Valve and Fittings
Industry
- PFI
:
Pipe Fabrication Institute
- ISO 9001: 2000 - Quality management systems Requirements
- ISO10005: 1995- Guidelines for quality plans
3.
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.1.
DEFINITIONS
Definitions in accordance with ISO 9000. The following definition is also used:
ITP (Inspection and testing plan): Document which establishes the necessary information to
carry out the Control of each activity which conform it, through a record of the inspections,
trials and tests required for the procedures, specifications and contractual requirements
established by the client.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 6 de 21
RMA (Register Matrix): Document created to establish the quantity of records to be issued
during the project in accordance with ITP, project lots and forms which must be sent.
3.2 ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations will be used in this Quality Plan:
SGC : Quality Management Plan (Sistema de Gestin de Calidad)
GP : Project Manager (Gerente de Proyecto)
OCO: Quality of work Office (Oficina de Calidad de Obra)
OTO: Work technical Office (Oficina Tcnica de Obra)
JOC: Quality Office Manager (Jefe de Oficina de Calidad)
JOT: Technical Office Manager (Jefe de Oficina Tcnica)
JCO: Construction Manager (Jefe de Construccin de Obra)
ADO: Project Construction Manager (Administrador de Obra)
GGE: Companys General Manager (Gerente General de empresa)
4.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

4.1.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
This Quality plan has been implemented to ensure the Quality Management System (QMS)
and Fluor Canada Ltd. quality requirements are implemented in every Construction Process
(Fig. 1).
CONTROL MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS DIAGRAM
Figure 1
Fig. 1 Subcontracted processes (NDT, Technical tests) will be supervised and audited
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 7 de 21
PROJECT QMS: has the following process:

-
QUALITY PROYECT PLAN (Planning): Quality Plan and its annexes

(Quality Policy; Project Quality Objectives; contract, legislation, codes, rules and
specifications of application; ITP; Register Matrix; Procedures, Forms)
Quality control of construction (Make): Inspection and testing activities, quality plan for
subcontractors, calibration control of measurement equipment, and testing, material at
work site control, testing and document control.
Construction Quality Assurance (Review and Perform): Internal Auditory, Nonconformances, corrective and preventing measures .Client satisfaction.
4.2.
DOCUMENTARY CONTROL
OTO, through the work Document Control (DC); controls and distributes all the Project
documentation which contains data and information which could affect the quality of the
contracted works (contract, administrative foundations, specifications, drawings,
manufacturers catalogues, proposal study). Drawings and technical specifications of the
Licitation base are part of the Document Control.
Control System of Document; will be as follows:
1. Reception of MEP through DC, documentary correspondence (technical and of quality)
sent by the client/subcontractor/MEP with transmittal, reproducible and prints.
2. Download of documentation, documents Access through transmittal number.
3. DC prints the document and redirects the document to the Construction chief (work) for
checking and indications for proper delivery.
4. Distribution to supervision, planning, technical office, topography and copy for filling;
reproducible and print, as indication of Construction Manager.
5. Include documents in a list for enquiry of every work department (updated version).
MOBILIZATION PROCESS DIAGRAM OF DOCUMENTS
FIG.2
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 8 de 21
Approved and updated documents should be at hand in the place where major operations
are realized for the proper functioning or our contract and where the plan requires it
(technical office. Quality Office, Construction Office, Specialist Managers)
MEP will act at field a copy of every plan of the project, original size; exclusively to have a
control of modifications realized (Red Line). With these drawings MEP will prepare As-built
drawings print and virtual version (last current version in Arequipa) to be submitted to Fluor
Canada Ltd for checking and approval.
All outdated documents will be DISALLOWED and retired by OTO, to avoid a wrong use.
OCO will perform regular documented and recorded audits and to assure the use of
specifications, drawings, procedures, instructions and other updated quality documents for
revision. OCO controls and distributes to involved sections and according its activity; Quality
Plan documentation (Procedures, Instructions, ITP, Forms, Policies and Quality Objectives)
as set forth in the Procedures General List of SGC and MEP policies MEP has a
documented procedure for this with the purpose to assure emission control, updating and
distribution.
If the Client imposes its own Document Manager. It will be used if not a MEP Document
Manager could be used.
4.3.
INSPECTION AND TESTING PLANS
OCO will issue Fluor Canada Ltd. Tentative ITP for approval in order to those tests which
are considered critical to be periodically coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd. to be present at
these and validate the execution with them.
4.4.
RECORD CONTROL
MEP has established, according to the activity, the use of forms for Quality control (records,
protocols, checking lists, etc.) in order to have an objective evidence of the production works
performed by the work employees.
Submitted forms of MEP will be used In the present project. In the absence of a proper form
for the control of a certain activity, OCO MEP will provide the one required, prior approval of
Fluor Canada Ltd.
Records are permanently created and realized, by the construction and MEP assembly for
approval and validity of Fluor Canada Ltd. Filling involves making notes in neat forms
neither modifications nor smudging.
Any alteration or failure (wrong filling) generates the invalidation of such document. Controls
will be previously scheduled and coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd, giving notice and
asking for its authorization
Record management including your file is in charge of OCO MEP, which supports in the
verification or checking process and verification before MEP.
Testing or trial records carried out by third parties will be submitted by them and their control
and filing are responsibility of OCO MEP.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 9 de 21
Original records, with full signatures, will be filed in accordance with previously agreed
processes with the client (systems, subsystems or areas). At the end of each process, they
will be given directly to QA Fluor Canada Ltd in the respective Dossier, at the end of every
stage of the process.
5.
FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSABILITIES

5.1.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
It is the Project managers commitment, representing MEP, the implementation of SCG of

MEP conveying in every project organization the importance of satisfying the established
requirements of Fluor as well as legislative and regulatory ones; and both MEP Quality
Policy and Quality Objectives which from time to time are reviewed through Quality Rates for
measuring compliance, Project Manager in line with his commitment and SGC
implementation development of MEP and the agreed with Fluor Canada Ltd sets up:
- Weekly meetings with his work force to assure the resources availability, checking
compliance with the scope of work program.
- Recorded monthly meetings to carry out advance revisions and compliance of scopes,
ensure providing during the project of MEP Quality Policy (5.3.) and the compliance of
goals identified (5.4.).
5.2.
CUSTOMER APPROACH - COORDINATIONS WITH FLUOR CANADA LTD.
MEP will perform the project coordinating with Fluor Canada Ltd permanently through
meetings in the agreed and conveyed place.
These meetings(will be attended by the Project manager, Chief of work, Work responsible,
HSE manager and Quality Manager) will be carried out at Fluor Canada Ltd. Facilities and
these will lead to understand the project results through Fluor Canada Ltd. and at the same
time as feedback and also improve the development of the project processes and products.
These meetings which be taken into account for MEP Internal Audits let to consolidate and
measure MEP Quality System.
5.3.
QUALITY POLICY
In line with the Quality Policy and de Quality objectives established by the general
Management, Project Manager is responsible on site for them to be diffused, understood and
kept, through internal channels.
5.4.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING
In line with MEP Quality objectives, GP has established for this Project the next Quality
Rates to be monthly measured and checked.
-
Quality chats: once a month

Welded joints repairing: 5% maximum
Welded joints performance: XX/ Hh welder
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 10 de 21
These rates are reported monthly in the Monthly Quality Report prepared by JOC and
presented to GP.
SGC on site is planned through the preparation of the present Quality Plan. Procedures,
instructions forms for registers and verification lists, PIE, construction processes,
implementation Schedule as well as resources and all the management elements specified
herein.
Quality Chief is responsible for management and updating the Quality Plan (QP), issuing the
PC Implementation Program, which allows planning and control the application and
compliance of PC on site.
5.5.
RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION
5.5.1 Responsibility and Authority

Hierarchical and Functional line of command for this project is defined in the nominal project
organizational structure approved by the senior executives.
The office organizational structure is defined in accordance with Fig. 3
PROJECT
MANAGER
QUALITY
CHIEF
QUALITY CONTROL
ASSISTANT
QA/QC CIVIL
SUPERVISOR
QA/QC CIVIL
SUPERVISOR
QA/QC PIPING
SUPERVISOR
LABORATORY
TECHNICIAN
LABORATORY
TECHNICIAN
ORGANIZATION OF QA / QC PROJECT K101

Figure 3
The functions and responsibilities of every MEP worker (direction and supervision staff) are
defined in the profiles included in your manual of organization and functions MEP-MFRRHH. The codes of profiles of project direction are mentioned:
a. Project Manager(PM)
Responsible for the compliance of plans and defined programs, providing the completion of
work as part of the plans under the contract and required quality.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 11 de 21
Perform the works taking into account the current budget of project.
Assure the compliance of plans and defined programs, providing the completion of the
work according to the arrangements fixed.
Nominate and management of necessary resources (equipment, material and manpower
qualified) to fulfill with the scopes and specified contractual requirements, and the present
PC, in order to obtain the clients satisfaction.
Responsible for the implantation of the present PC on site providing the quality of the
works performed, defining the preventive form the corrective and preventive measures
and checking the results obtained.
Coordinate with the client the requirements previously to avoid non-Conformances and
guiding during the execution of the non-commissioner and commissioner, providing the
resources and demands required.
b. Eng. Chief Construction (CHC)
Responsible for the constructive processes of the work in accordance with the rule of the
rules, procedures and other contractual quality requirements established.
Prepare and present prior to commencing constructive Process of the work, procedures
which require to be used in the Construction and other required events for approval of
Fluor Canada Ltd.
Coordinate and carry out the removal of Non-conformances and other remarks presented
during the project.
Coordinate modifications and engineering inquiries through OTO/MEP.
Verify the management of documents, drawings and other technical specifications,
updated and approved for construction, remove all outdated data which could cause
confusion and therefore affect the quality of the processes and products of the work.
Have a control of the modifications performed in the drawings (Red Lines) and depending
on the progress of the work, submit them to OTO for footage control.
Perform work taking into account the safety of workers as well as facilities, equipment
and machinery.
c. Technical Office Manager (TOM)

Responsible for the management and distribution of applicable construction documents
(Drawings, technical specifications, procedures, other), monitoring the progress of the
project and providing the construction technically.
d. Construction Manager (CM)
Responsible for the personal management and warehouse on site including supervision
at the work site, coordinating with the client entrance proceedings and submittal of
identification cards.
Supports the performance of the contract. MEP warehouse areas on work site , personnel
and local assistant are beneath his responsibility
Personnel area will be in charge of calculation and payments of benefits, calculation and
social payments, recruitment of personnel and obtain all necessary documents for the
access to the sites of Minera Cerro Verde. Construction Manager will be also in charge of
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 12 de 21
coordinating with the client the use of entrance proceedings and submittal of identification
cards.
Social assistant will assist the personnel to solve any demand or conflict of MEP workers
as assigned to project.
Warehouse responsible will be in charge of management of tool and consumable
warehouses supplied by MEP and monitoring of project work site related to MEP.
e. Quality Office Manager (QOM)

Responsible for PC Implementation and Management, assuring the quality of the project
and presentation of Quality Dossiers to Fluor Canada Ltd.; and reporting the Project
Manager monthly with a copy for the Corporate Quality Chief.
-
Depends hierarchically of GP and functionally of Quality Management Chief of MEP.

Coordinate the quality aspects related to the project before Fluor Canada Ltd.
Manage the quality control of the work through the elaboration of ITPs coordinating with
PCM and TOM, and Registers Matrix.
Responsible for PC Implementation and maintenance or registers and quality procedures
on site.
Identify opening and keeping control of Internal Non Conformance reports (NCR) of work,
realizing monitoring and management for the adjournment and closure of NCR.
Elaborate and present Fluor Canada Ltd. dossiers of the project to according to the
progress of the work.
Supports PM and for the implementation of the Quality plan, conveying policy and
objectives of quality of MEP-K101, monitoring through documented internal Audits, and
establishment in all MEP-K101areas and its contractors.
Verify through internal documented Audits, all the outdated documents, drawings and
constructive processes have been removed and using the last version of the project
approved for construction
It has the necessary functions autonomy to stop the work, rejecting a work, remove a
work order; refusing the materials which do not fulfill with the specifications of the project.
Quality staff will not get involved in management and construction process control.
Be completely familiarized with the approaches of contract works, drawings and
specifications.
Submit monthly reports with a summary of OCO activities to the PM with copy for the
MEP Corporate Quality Manager; according to QC Monthly report ON SITE
Verify and monitoring updated Control of the Inspection equipment, measurement and
testing and its respective certifications.
5.5.2 Direction Representative in the Quality Area

In the current project the PM is designed as MEP representative. The QMO depends
functionally on MEP-K101 Quality Manager who at the same time has been designed by
GGE as its representative in order to on its behalf and independently of other
responsibilities, has the authority to assure, apply and maintain the QMS of MEP in the
project.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 13 de 21
5.5.3. Communication
MEP-K101 schedules the execution of meetings as a means to unification, analysis and
solution consensus. The meetings are oriented to:
Internal Meetings
Project Manager of MEP-K101 will establish regular recorded meetings of internal
coordination (once a week) related to disciplines of the project (civil, mechanical, electrical,
and others) and the support areas if required; with the purpose of talking about aspects
related to the monitoring the control and quality of product assurance.
Different actions related to the quality among the different subcontractors will additionally be
coordinated
MEP-K101 uses the next internal communication channels:
- E-mails
- Informative presentations
- Training booklets
- Pamphlets and/or index cards on work site
Meetings with subcontractors:
MEP-K101 will establish regular recorded meetings, with the main subcontractors. Aspects
related to control and quality assurance on the subcontractors side will be spoken (quality
rates, ups and downs in the welders, Non Conformances statistics, usual value in the results
of trials, implementation of corrective actions, etc.)
Revision by Direction: performed as set forth in 5.6
5.6.
Revision by Direction
5.6.1 Entrance information and Revision Results

At the completion of the work, the PM evaluates the effectiveness and adequacy of QMS to
satisfy the requirements of ISO 9001 to accomplish the policy and MEP quality objectives.
The necessity to make changes and create opportunities is identified for a continuous
improvement.
The evaluations include at least aspects such as:
Achievement of quality objectives in the work.
Results of internal auditors performed.
Relevant Non conformances.
Complaints made by the client (Fluor Canada Ltd).
Corrective and preventive Actions pursued.
Development of subcontractors hired.
QMO keeps the register of such evaluation. This takes part of the entrance information to be
checked by GGE. It will be generated before the demobilization of QMO or a month later of
the end of the work.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
6.
Page : 14 de 21
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
6.1.
MATERIAL RESOURCES
Project Manager is responsible to supply the material and human resources for the
procurement of the project objectives. He will decide the scope, No of resources, lasting time
for the assignation of them in the work with the purpose to ensure the objectives of the
project are reached. Internal Reference: Recruitment and Staff Selection
6.2.
HUMAN RESOURCES
MEP will provide staff highly trained according to their specialties, with staff in supervision,
direction and performance with wide experience.
6.2.1 Training and recruitment
Carried out according to the functions of MEP staff will perform in the project.
-
Training in technical subjects and QMS needed to improve our quality of service
Training panels on technical subjects and QMS needed to improve our quality service
delivery of training booklets.
Document evaluations and qualifications of the supervision staff, direction and
performance of the work (affect quality) and the quality office which monitors and supplies
QMS
We assure all the staff understands clearly the influence that the deficient
accomplishment of a work has over other workers, clients and the success of the
organization as a group. Internal Reference: Training Record
6.3.
INFRASTRUCTURE
MEP keeps for the staff, proper facilities on work site (offices, workshops, warehouses and
services), computing equipment (equipment and nets) and the software needed to develop
properly the contract, with antivirus and support of the relevant documentation of MEP.
MEP is responsible for the of its work zones, performing operations in order to reduce risks
provoked by thefts, damages, vandalism, sabotages and other conditions to a minimum.
In communication, MEP takes into account the use of telephones, mobiles, radio equipment
and system for the staff as needed.
Accommodations and feeding for the staff during their stay in the project will be supplied by
MEP.
6.4.
WORKING ENVIRONMENT
MEP provides personal protection equipment required in the work and will implement
Inducting talks which will include minimum guidelines needed to be performed in safe
conditions in the working environment.
MEP records the attendance to such talks and delivery of personal protection equipment.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 15 de 21
MEP including the staff, suppliers and subcontractors will use only the access roads
designed by Fluor Canada Ltd. for being used. Every safety helmet and vehicles will have
MEPs logo printed.
7.
PRODUCT REALIZATIN
7.1.
PRODUCT REALIZATION PLANNING
Considering:
-
Delivery of the Quality documentation (Quality Plan, Procedures, Instructions and Forms)
to the principal office of the work.
Authorization to work (separated codified) for the new generation of recorded procedures
and instructions when their absence affects negatively the quality.
Coordination with the client for approval of quality plan of rev.A (negotiation) to rev0
(performance), after the identification of activities which require monitoring and control as
part of a continuous program of quality control of each one of the processes.
OCO of MEP will submit to Fluor Canada Ltd. for approval the ITP of the construction
processes in order to those inspections and tests considered critical are permanently
coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd., are present in them and validate their performance.
Elaborate RMA for future registers advance control.
Monitoring activities and processes control and accomplishment of procedures,
instructions and specifications of the contract.
Approval of works recorded through the protocols and corresponding registers.
The identification of activities which require monitoring and control to continue the
performance of the process, in the inspection plans and testings of this plan.
Verification of non conformances in engineering such us interferences, lack of information
and construction and assembly difficulties.
Identification of especial and critical constructive aspects of activities like welding and
concreting; their monitoring and variable control.
7.2.
PROCESSES RELATED TO THE CLIENT
7.2.1 Communication con el Client

The communication with Fluor Canada Ltd. will be through meetings, letters, mails and POL
systems (Fluor Canada Ltd.). Project Manager of MEP or the person he nominates, checks,
approves and conveys the modifications asked directly by the client, to the functions and
involved units in the work.
Registers of the agreements and authorizations of the client are kept to make changes or
modifications to the contract or technical specifications of the project.
7.3.
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
Created by Fluor Canada Ltd.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
7.4.
Page : 16 de 21
PURCHASES: MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED TO THE WORK.
On MEPs side: everything detailed in the document furnished by the client "Scope of Work Section 2 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED BY COMPANY AND
CONTRACTOR will be respected.
On the clients side (FLUOR):
- 36 Carbon steel pipelines
- 36,12, 8 HDPE pipelines
- Valves of all types and dimensions
- Transformers
- Environment and all the material for the implementation and connection in the Electric
room.
- Pump assembly
- Every type of material involved directly to the project MEP shall verify the quality
certificates and shall be subject of approval by FLUOR Canada Ltd.
7.5.
PRODUCTION Y SERVICE PROVISION
7.5.1 Production Control and Service Provision

Objectionable Work Reprocessing and re-inspections and job tests will be performed by
MEP without any additional cost, except where the work was performed according to the
contract.
Inspection or lack of inspection by Fluor Canada Ltd. shall not be considered as renouncing
of any of their rights to the insurance of the contract or any right to reject Non conformances.
For Control Production, registers are made (protocols and checklists), inspections and
testings as objective evidence of the proper performance of activities.
Final release and delivering of work: As the construction proceeds, MEP will take notes in
Red (Red Line), of every change in the development of the work, which will be submitted
immediately.
Additionally MEP shall file the replacement documents which approve the design
modifications and then present OTO, the final deliverables As-Built in Fluor Canada Ltd
standard form and also adjoining the Red Line ones (notes in red) as form of support.
Releasing process and delivery will be realized by systems or as defined by the client. The
documentary acceptance will realize through the delivery of the project dossier to QA from
FLUOR Canada Ltd who checks and approves.
Work Quality of MEP plans to organize the dossier as established with Fluor Canada Ltd.
including:
- Inspection and Testing plans of every discipline ( ITPs).
- Original Registers of the Inspections performed (civil, mechanical, electrical and
Instrumentation), properly signed by the supervisor of Fluor Canada Ltd.
- Original Registers of testing performed in situ or laboratory.
- Calibration of instruments certificates.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 17 de 21
Certificates of welders qualification and Welding Processes
Dossiers will be submitted to FLUOR the original and scanned, with the form No Letter of
Acceptance to be singed as a form of approval.
An additional scanned copy will take part of the Files of MEP Quality Control.
7.5.2 .Validation of Processes and provision of services
MEP does not validate the process developed by the present project due to is engineering
developed by the client. MEP will support with personnel and tools for the tests of
commissioning support.
7.5.3 Identification and Traceability of the Product
The identification of the product incorporated to the construction and performance
processes, as the mechanic e, electric and instrumentation equipment, other as anchor
bolts, piping and welding fixtures are established in a process of material traceability.
Traceability at the same time is applied to the activities of welded joints (pipes and boiler)
and laying of structural concrete and also elements for the process of construction through
the marks clearly pointed on the surface of the elements to control.
Reference: Identification and Traceability of the Installation Parts
7.5.4 Client Property
Verification mechanisms for identification, reception and load of supplies from Fluor Canada
Ltd. added to the construction or assembling processes, are considered in a writing process.
This verification may be realized in the presence of Fluor Canada Ltd, its representative, or
who has transported the product if applicable. This activity does not exempt Fluor Canada
Ltd. to deliver the acceptable supply.
Any abnormal situation detected during the reception control shall be immediately reported
to the Construction Manager and Quality Office MEP.
Where corresponds, the reception of products or services given by Fluor Canada Ltd may
be indicated in the Inspection and Testing Plans.
In the event of detecting information, none conform (lost, damaged or unsuitable for its use)
product or service (engineering, supplies, facilities or works), shall be recorded and reported
immediately by MEP to Fluor Canada Ltd. In the agreed place for damaged material, they
will be pointed with an inscription which shows its disuse.
Such materials shall be retired according and through approved form and documentation
and also a previously coordinated schedule with FLUORS. The handling and storage of
supply furnished by FLUOR is performed according to the mechanisms of 7.4.5 herein.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 18 de 21
7.5.5. Product Conservation

Once FLUOR furnishes the equipments, materials and related; those are beneath
responsibility of MEP so that the responsible of warehouses (when is in storage) work
manager (when assembling) and will have to take measurements to avoid damage in
general and therefore foreseen Non-conformances until the final reception on the side of
FLUOR in any case MEP responsible people.
MEP considers a Procedure for reception, storage, handling and preservation of its supplies
and the clients in the warehouses or patios which the work requires.
If the work requirements allow this, specific instructions are created for special conditions of
handling, preservation and storage of equipment and particular supplies. Non conform
supplies are identified as defines in 8.2 while remaining in the storage areas mentioned
above.
Reference:
K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Material Receiving Procedure
K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Material & Equipment Storage Procedure
7.6.
CONTROL OF MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT
The equipment for inspection, measurement and testing to be used in the work should have
current calibration certificates in order to assure the values to measure are exact and the
technical specification of the project are accomplished. The next date for calibration and
comparison should be planned and is established the period of validity of one year after
which the equipments shall be sent for revision and calibration to renew another period of
validity.
The inspection and testing is also extended to products received. It must not be used a
product/batch or allow them leave until they have not overcome the respective inspection
stages and pertinent tests (this will be reflected in the respective records). Products which do
not overcome the inspection and testing stages are Non conform and an appropriate
process for these kind of products will be applied (Non-conform product process).
Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001
8.
ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

8.1.
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
To know the appropriate development of the processes and degree of the clients
satisfaction, information is from time to time compiled and analyzed from the next sources:
8.1.1. Clients Satisfaction
The clients satisfaction is the final objective in every service given by MEP. It will evaluate
and analyze formally, according to the established in reference to the client complaints, is
duty of any receptor redirect the original to the Construction Manager and Project Manager
(PM). He is the one who, prior verification, notifies the involved areas about its existence
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 19 de 21
describing it and pointing out its immediate processing, conveying the GP and the Quality
Management Area of MEP.
Afterwards, the GP of MEP with the Construction Manager evaluates the complaint to decide
its definitive processing and reply the client in writing.
The Construction Manager of MEP, in the light of the complaints will be able to take
corrective actions where applicable, requiring the participation of other area responsible
involved in this.
The manager of the Quality of Work Office of MEP (OCO) will file a copy of every complaint
as well as the corrective actions taken and the result of such corrective actions, for the
revision of the Quality System by the Direction, notifying the GP such result and this at the
same time to the Construction Manager who will answer in writing to the client pointing out
the application and result of the Corrective Action.
To improve the service given to the client, OCO compiles:
Complaints of the client (letters, meeting notes, NCR, work control book)
Refusal of payoff statement
Acts of Measurement of the clients satisfaction.
Reference: Evaluation of the Clients Satisfaction
8.1.2. Satisfaction of Product
The registers of every inspection and testing performed (protocols, checklists, certificates,
reports, etc.) are kept. They can be considered as internal resources or external organisms
evaluated to perform any of the testing indicated in the technical specifications of the project.
All the register of the Quality plan issued by land and signed by the people responsible
indicated in those, it is considered as conform (approved).
Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing.
8.1.3. Internal Audits
With the objective to assure the Quality on site accomplishes the requirements of ISO
9001:2008 and the Quality Plan on work site, MEP realizes internal audits about quality on
work site performed according to Internal Audits Annual Plan approved by MEP Quality
Committee where the Work Audits are included according to K101-QC-PL-PR-002;
considering extraordinary those which are not included in such plan.
These ones are performed by qualified Internal Auditor sand independent of the activities
and audited areas and documented in a Report of Audits. The next points will be evaluated:
- Verify the accomplishment of every aspect of the Quality Plan.
- MEPs ITP and the subcontractors ones are monitored and have the corresponding
quality registers
- Verify the degree of implementation and effectiveness of the Quality Plan.
- Non Conformances (NC) are complemented.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
Page : 20 de 21
Verify the implementation of corrective actions and record the effectiveness.

Verify if the activities and quality results of the work accomplish the provisions planned.
The Chief Auditor is responsible for:

- Summon the audits, notifying about the agenda in advance.
- Issue the Auditory Report, as well as its distribution.
- Perform the monitoring for the solution of the detected Non Conformances in the closure
dates foreseen.
Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits.
8.2.
Non Conformance Product Control (NC)
Procedure K101-QC-PL-PR-001, to identify and management of deviations according to

what was specified in the contract or in the procedures and instructions applied in the area to
perform the project, including MEP deliverables and those of the client will be applied unless
otherwise the contract determines the opposite in order to these are documented, examined
and solved through Non Conformance Reports (NCR).
The process to manage an internal NC is:
Originated for any employee of Mota-Engil Peru who describes what was detected
The opening for a NC is performed by the manager of the Quality of Work Office (QWO)
Who will code, record and perform its monitoring. He will sent the NC to the involved area
and convey the people involved. (Project Manager, Construction Manager).
- Analyze the Non Conformance cause by the Direction, and involved personnel and
determination of the action to correct the non-conformance.
- Correction performed by the responsible of the involved area as soon as possible.
- Verify the right corrective action and closure of the NC by QOM.
- NCR must be conveyed to Fluor Canada Ltd. regarding the External Non Conformance
handling, these are originated for the supervision of work Fluor Canada Ltd.:
- It is MEP responsibility to close the Non Conformances according to the procedures
previously established in accordance with Fluor Canada Ltd.
- Perform the removal of NCR, asking for its closure through a letter addressed to Fluor
Canada Ltd engineering for approval.
- If required, the procedure could be carried out by the seller, manufacturer or specialist.
Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process
-
8.3.
DATA ANALYSIS
The main sources of information established to monitor and analyze the quality system are:
registers which release and compile from the information in item 8.1 of this plan.
These data let to evaluate where the continuous improvements can be created in such
system. Paying special attention to the information concerning to the clients satisfaction,
defined processes, suppliers, and conformity of product requirements.
QUALITY PLAN
Version: 0
8.4.
Page : 21 de 21
IMPROVEMENT
8.4.1. Continuous Improvement

The implementation of continuous Improvement through the analysis of controlled results by
means of indicators, taken from:
- NCR issued internally and supervised by Fluor Canada Ltd.
- Monthly reports of the work: non quality costs produced
- Internal Audits Reports
- Corrective Actions Monitoring
8.4.2.
PREVENTIVE AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
To prevent possible deviations of the Quality System implemented or when any NRC is
produced in a Corrective Actions Reports will be emitted according to the next NCR
HANDLING/REPAIR ANALYSIS CAUSES CA (Corrective Action) CA (Corrective
Action) oriented to establish measures which let avoiding potential causes of NCR.
The aim of this activity is to detect, analyze and eliminate potential causes of NCR.
CA is planned, registered, performed with allocation of responsibilities according to their
nature of the NC performed.
Corrective and preventive Actions are:
- Record and identification of Non Conformances associated
- Studying of causes
- Decision to implement them and assignate resources and terms
- Perform and control concrete actions
- Verify the effectiveness of the action implemented
Clients complaints related to Non Conformances of Mota-Engil Peru responsibilities to
create corrective actions.
Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process
9.
ANNEXES
-
ANEXO 1: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process

ANEXO 2: K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits
ANEXO 3: K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing Plan
ANEXO 4: K101-QC-PL-PR-004 Acquaintance of Quality Plan Instructive
ANEXO 5: K101-QC-PL-PR-005 Quality Control Forms
ANEXO 6: K101-QC-PL-PR-006 Measurement equipment control and testing procedure
ANEXO 7: K101-QC-PL-PR-007 Personnel Training Program
ANEXO 8: K101-QC-PL-PR-008 Subcontractor Qualification
ANEXO 9: K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Reception of Material
ANEXO 10: K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Storage of Material and Equipment
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
NON-CONFORMANCE PROCESS
Page : 1 - 11
Annex 1
ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL
PROCEDURE: NON-CONFORMANCE PROCESS
CODE: K101-QC-PL-PR-001
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 2 - 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OBJECT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SCOPE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. RESPONSABILITIES -------------------------------------------------------------------
4. DEFINITIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1.
NON CONFORMANCE
---------------------------------------------
4.2.
NON CONFORMANCE CLASIFICATION
-----------------------
5. PROCEDURE -----------------------------------------------------------------------------5.1.
GENERAL
5.2.
IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTS
5.3.
CLASIFICATION
5.4.
DISPOSAL
5.5.
VERIFICATION AND CLOSURE
5.6.
REGISTER
6. ANNEXES
-------------------------------------------------------------------
3
3
4
4
----------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
Page : 3 - 11
1.
OBJECT
The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements for identification, creation,
control and closure of non conformances and guarantee corrective actions carry out
satisfactorily. It is also an important part in the learned lessons of the process.
2.
SCOPE
This instruction is applied for the Project, realized by MEP in which it is possible to
identify defects, changes, modifications made to drawings, specifications and other
documents of the contract during construction.
3.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Project Manager and Quality Management are responsible for the administration of this
work procedure.
All the personnel who work on field and related to quality are responsible for the
identification of non conformances and report before QAQC Field manager.
QAQC Manager is responsible to start, classify, elaborate and record the Non
Conformance Reports. QAQC Manager is also responsible for maintaining a register of
Non Conformances.
Field Engineering Manager is responsible for the correction of problem if it is less, and
contact with Construction for important breaches.
Discipline supervisors are responsible to check all non conformances and propose
corrective measures.
Project Manager and Engineering Manager are responsible for approval and
documentation of Non Conformance Reports.
Due to potential effect which may cause a Non Conformance for the project, it is up to
every involved person to identify and solve Non Conformances as soon as possible.
Comment which may arise during the application of this work instruction shall be solved
by EP QAQC Field Manager and MEP Project Manager.
QAQC Manager shall notify the contractors and different project disciplines about the
NCR by e-mail.
4.
DEFINITIONS
4.1 NON CONFORMANCES
Non Conformance is defined as any condition in which equipment, materials or
manpower do not fulfill with the approved drawings, specifications, codes or regulations
during the manufacturing process, installation and assembly.
Failures which are corrected as a routine part before completing construction activities (a
case in point, weld repairs, coupling re-alignment of pump motor, less importance drilling
and slitting) will not be considered as Non Conformances provided the manufacturing,
installation and assembly process have been finished.
4.2 NON CONFORMANCES CLASIFICATION
Non Conformances are classified in increasing order.
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
Page : 4 - 11
Minor Non Conformance

Any defect, at Construction Managers opinion, may be corrected on field without
engineering assistance. A Less Non Conformance does not affect the installation
adjustment or function. Clients approval shall be obtained if required by contract.
Mayor Non Conformances
Any defect which affects considerably the installation form or function and/or requires
assessment and Engineering disposal.
5.
PROCEDURE
5.1 GENERAL
Non Conformance Reports are prepared to document technical failures and other Quality
Non Conformance not identified are solved through Quality Assurance Audits, technical
revisions and other control processes defined in other part of Quality Management
System. The requirements of this work instruction before the following activities:
Non Conformance definition
Identification and presentation of reports
Clasification
Purpose
Verification and closure.
Documentation
Registers
Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report shows Non Conformance Reports Form, from
identification to closure.
5.2 IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTS
Non Conformance may be identified by any member of the field personnel who are
responsible to notify QAQC Field Manager.
In reference to the identification of a non conformance. QAQC Field Manager shall start,
classify, produce and record a Non Conformance Report F01301 Non Conformance
Report in accordance with this work instruction.
Non Conformances may be identify by any person involved in the construction process
and must be reported to QAQC Field Manager the very same day. QAQC Field Manager
shall be responsible for the verification through QC supervisors of Non Conformance by
qualifying it as minor or mayor and reporting in the form F01301_No Conformance Report
accurately where documentation will be processed; it will verify the application of the final
disposal and ensures the closure of Non Conformance report. Verification of the Non
Conformance will be recorded in the Non Conformance Report (NCR) and will be given to
the Field Engineering Manager for its verification in the workday; in general the
verification of NCR will be carried out with the departments involved in the listed remarks.
5.3 CLASIFICATION
Defect Clasification determines whether corrective measures may apply before revision of
engineering or not. Defects classified as minor may be solved without prior approval of
Engineering, possible defects classified as mayor shall be approved by Engineering
before the implementation of corrective actions.
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
Page : 5 - 11
5.4 DISPOSAL
Non Conformances will be evaluated by QAQC Field Manager, Project Manager, and
Superintendent responsible for discipline and others as necessary. Non Conformance
extension will be evaluated and disposal / corrective actions will be proposed and
recorded in NCR.
Proposed corrective action must be approved by Fluor QA or field engineering before
proceed. Fluor QA must be informed after completion for NCR closure verification
If the non conformance is classified as minor, proceed as follows:
Engineering Manager shall correct the defect he deems prudent and necessary, then
record the corrective action taken in the Non Conformance Report.
Non Conformance Report completed will be communicated, as set forth in Annex.
If the non conformance is classified as mayor, proceed as follows:
QAQC Manager shall check out the Non Conformance with the Discipline Leader or
person nominated.
The report is transmitted to the Discipline Leader for revision, disposal/approval of
corrective measures.
Corrective measures shall be approved by the person who recorded the non conform
element with the documentation approved in written as required.
Disposal which results in a product finished which fulfills with the drawings, specifications,
codes and regulations approved will be presented to the client for revision and approval
before its implementation. If the non conform element is not clearly pointed in the project
specifications, Mota-Engil shall propose the corrective measures with approval of
Engineering and the Client. Corrective measures proposed shall include the Non
Conformance cause as well as measures to prevent the occurrence.
5.5 VERIFICATION AND CLOSURE
The disposal of the Non Conformance will be verified by QAQC Field Manager. Project
Manager shall verify that the measures to prevent the occurrence have been taken. Non
Conformance Reports will not be closed until all the corrective actions and preventive
measures have been completed, long-term corrective measures have been established
and applied and all the applicable drawings and documents have been updated and
distributed properly. Final closure will be done with the signature of the Project Manager,
QAQC Field Manager and the client (if required by contract). In that way the Corrective
Action Report Form F01401 Corrective Action Report will be used.
5.6 DOCUMENTATION
QAQC Manager on field shall maintain each NCR in a file with supporting documentation
which may include:
First notice which led the NCR
Engineering results, technical evaluation and answer.
Other information related necessary to document the disposal.
QAQC Manager on field shall maintain a NCR record which indicates the state of all Non
Conformance Reports (log de NCR).
5.7 REGISTER
Complete NCR (closed) and related documentation will be kept as quality registers and
will be delivered at the end of the project according to the procedures approved of the
Project.
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
Page : 6 - 11
6.
ANNEXES
-
Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report

Annex F01302 Non Conformance Report Log
Annex F01401 Corrective Action Report
Annex F01402A Corrective Action Status Log
Annex F01501 Preventive Action Log
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 7 - 11
Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
Tag Description:
ID A01301A
Tag No.:
Turnover System:
P. O. No.:
Inspection Classification
Subcontractor:
Subcontractor
Client
Sub System:
Fluor
Other
Location:
Initiated by:
Date:
Hold Tag
Yes
Area/Location
Unit/Equip No.
NCR No.
No
Discipline/Responsibility:
Spec./Rev.
DWG. No./Rev.
Audit No. (If Applicable)
DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE
CAUSE CODE(S)
ROOT CAUSE
DISPOSITION
Other
Repair
Rework
Use as is
Design Eng. Approval Req.
DISPOSITION BY
Construction Engineer
Date
Contractor
Date
Yes
No
DISPOSITION
COMPLETED BY
Design Engineer
ACTION VERIFIED AND NON-CONFORMANCE CLOSED
VERIFICATION METHOD
DOC REVIEW
FLUOR INSPECTOR
INSPECTION
OTHER
DATE
FLUOR-VERIFIED DISPOSITION AND RECOMMENDED CLOSURE OF NCR

FLUOR SITE QUALITY MANAGER
DATE
Date
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 8 - 11
Annex F01302 Non Conformance Report Log

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT LOG
ID A01302
Page _______of _______

NCR No.
Discipline
Hold
Tag
Date Opened
Date Closed
Description of Nonconformance
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 9 - 11
Annex F01401 Corrective Action Report
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT

1 - Identification
Supplier Name:
Contract/P.O. No.:
CAR Number:
Originator:
Personnel contracted:
Discipline:
ID A01401A
Date:
2 - Nonconformity
Reference:
Requirement:
Description:
Contributing Cause(s): [List code number(s) see Att. 1 of 000 509 0140]
3 Correction of Nonconformity (By Responsible Person)
Plan to address the Nonconformity (e.g. correct/repair/waiver)
Estimated Completion Date:
4 Corrective Action Section (By Responsible Person)

In the judgement of the Responsible Person, is an analysis of the root cause(s) of this nonconformity
required (including determining a plan to prevent recurrence) in light of the magnitude of the problem and
the risk involved? (If Yes, continue: if no, mark N/A below).
Yes / No
Root Cause(s): List code number(s) see 000.509.0140.att. 1, and explain underlying reason why
nonconformity occurred
Plan to Prevent Recurrence:
Estimated Completion Date:
Responsible Person:
Date:
5 Closeout Verification
Correction of Nonconformity:
Verifier:
Date:
Corrective Action Implemented and Effective: (only completed when a root cause was determined see
4 above)
Evaluator:
Date:
PROCEDURE
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
Version : 0
Page : 10 - 11
Annex F01402A Corrective Action Status Log
CORRECTIVE ACTION STATUS LOG

CAR No.
Date
Initiated
Description of CAR
Contractor/Supplier
Contract/P.O. No.
ID A01402A
Responsible Person
Response
Received Date
Date
Closed
K101-QC-PL-PR-001
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 11 - 11
Annex F01501 Preventive Action Log
PREVENTIVE ACTION LOG

Project Name :
PA No.
Cause
Code
C01
C02
C03
C04
C05
C06
Issue
Date
ID A01501A
Project Number:
Source
Description
Client Driven
Communication Driven
Equipment or Material
External Phenomenon
Location Driven
Management Driven
Cause
Code
Description
Cause Code
C07
C08
C09
C10
C11
C99
Elimination
Code
Description
Procedure (except procedure not followed)
Procedure/Work Process not followed
People Driven
Systems Driven
Work Environment
Other
Confirmation of Action
Elimination Code
E01
E02
E03
E04
E05
E99
Verified by
Date
Closed
Description
Revision/modification of work process/document
Issuance of QA/QC report to affected personnel
Issuance of document/procedure
Training/orientation of affected personnel
Verbally advising affected personnel
Other
PROCEDURE
Code:K101-QC-PL-PR-002
Version : 0
QUALITY CONTROL AUDITS

Page : 1 - 7
Annex 2
PROCEDURE: QUALITY CONTROL AUDITS
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 2 - 7
TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE
1.
OBJECT
2.
SCOPE
3.
DEFINITIONS
4.
REFERENCES
5.
RESPONSIBILITIES
6.
7.
5.1
PROJECT MANAGER ON FIELD
5.2
QA / QC MANAGER
REQUIREMENTS
6.1
AUDIT PLAN
6.2
NOTICE
6.3
AUDIT DEVELOPMENT
6.4
AUDIT RESULTS
6.5
CORRECTIVE ACTION / CLOSURE AND SIGNATURE
6.6
AUDIT REPORT
6.7
REGISTERS
6.8
AUDIT PERSONNEL
ANNEXES
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 3 - 7
1.
OBJECT
This Procedure provides requirements and methods to plan, perform, report and close the
Quality Control Audits related to the Project.
The purpose of these audits is to evaluate the implementation of the Project Quality
System.
2.
SCOPE
Quality Control Audits are under direction of QA / QC Manager, frequency and schedule
of Quality Control Audits shall be established since the beginning of the project.
When determine the Quality Control Audits Schedule, planning and advance or work in
the project shall be taken into account.
Quality Control Audits are performed by using the Quality System criteria established in
the Assurance and Quality Control Plan. These criteria also include the corresponding
specifications, instructive, drawings and procedures on field.
3.
DEFINITIONS
Analysis and systems managements to identify and then to correct different vulnerabilities
which may present in an exhaustive revision of the working processes.
4.
REFERENCES
ISO 9001-2008.
5.
RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1. PROJECT MANAGER
Responsible for determining which systems and departments shall be audited. The
manager is responsible to assure the corrective measures are specified according the
audits results and nominate necessary resources for this.
5.2. QA / QC MANAGER
QA / QC Manager is responsible to perform the systems and departments audits
identified by the Project Manager on field.
QA / QC Manager shall identify, nominate the personnel for the audit and provide
technical training and counseling to the quality auditors as required.
6.
REQUIREMENTS
6.1. AUDIT PLAN
Audit Plan shall be created by the QA / QC Manager and presented to the Construction
Manager in charge of approving it. This plan shall be checked during the year as needed.
Audits will be carried out by using checklists. These lists will identify the quality
requirements to be audited, references related to the documents and verification method.
The list will also provide a space to take some notes about the audit results.
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 4 - 7
6.2. NOTICE
Project Team, including the Construction Manager will be notified about the audits in
advance. This notice will include Schedule of the audit activities and the name of the
auditor or audit team leader. The client will receive a copy of the project audit schedule
for revision.
6.3. AUDIT DEVELOPMENT
The audit will be preceded for a meeting in the work site to check the plan, establish
communication channels and present the checklist to be used in the audit. This list will
identify basic requirements; however it will not restrict the investigation of the audit when
results merit further investigation to determine the accomplishment of the Quality System
requirements.
When using such checklists, the auditor will verify the implementation of quality system in
the work. The foregoing information includes conversations with the personnel of work
procedures revision, registers, documentation, work trials and revision of finished and in
process works
An exit meeting will be carried out in the work for:
Present Audit results and discuss which was observed.
Define potential corrective action/s.
Discuss attribution of responsibilities to apply corrective action/s.
Establish a closure date of deficiencies and disagreements.
6.4. AUDIT RESULTS
Audit results will be edited by using the Quality Audit Results Form F01702 Rc Audit
Summary. This form describes Quality requirements, result, corrective actions
requirements and closure date scheduled.
Project Manager in Site will determine corrective actions considering:
Possible necessity of further investigations to identify completely the scope and
severity of results in order to the cause may be determined and corrected.
Possible necessity to modify or check the quality system procedures to describe the
real practices which fulfill with the basic requirements of the quality system.
6.5. CORRECTIVE ACTION / CLOSURE AND SIGNATURE
If it is not possible an agreement during the exit meeting in the Work, the auditor or
auditor team leader with the Construction Manager will put forward a solution. The agreed
results will be written in the Quality Audit Results.
The Area or Audited Disciplines are responsible to determine the necessary actions to
correct failures pointed out in the Quality Audit Results within the closure dates
established.
QA / QC Manager is responsible to determine the corrective actions required in the
corporative manuals to deal with failures described in the Quality Audit Results and
establish closure dates for them.
Supervisors of the Audited Discipline shall verify the implementation of every corrective
action.
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 5 - 7
6.6. AUDIT REPORT

The auditor or audit team leader shall prepare a written report which will include:
Description of the Audit, including the scope thereof and an evaluation about the
global effectiveness of the quality control system to be audited.
Summary of the audit results and conclusions pointing out whether the work is
performing or not a quality work with enough safety.
Quality Audit Results (with corrective actions and Closure dates scheduled) will be
attached to the Audit Report.
Audit Reports will be handed out to the Project Manager, Construction Manager and QA /
QC Manager.
Upon receiving communication about the closure of Quality Audit from the auditors, QA /
QC Manager will notify the Project Manager and Construction Manager that corrective
actions have been implemented and the pointed failures have been closed in the Audit
Results.
6.7. Registres
A copy of the Audit Report, Quality Audit Results and Audit Closure Notice will be kept as
well as the Quality Registers of the work. A copy will be submitted to the client.
6.8. Audit Personnel
Experience and Training of every auditor should be proportional according to the Audit
assigned.
QA / QC personnel assigned to the audited Work or related to it may carry out the audits.
7.
ANNEXES
-
Annex F01701 Audit Finding

Annex F01702 Audit Summary
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 6 - 7
Annex F01701 Audit Finding

AUDIT FINDING
1)
Project/Contract Number:
Project Name:
ID A01701
Finding Number:
Audit Date:
Auditor(s):
Auditee Personnel Contacted:
2)
A. Reference:
B. Requirement:
Continued on back
3)
Deficiency:
Continued on back
4)
Proposed Disposition:
Expected Completion Date:

5)
Corrective Action Evaluation, and Response:
Disposition (Action taken to correct deficiency)
Completion Date:
6)
Auditee Signature:
Date:
7)
Auditor Concurrence with disposition:
Date:
Continued on back
8)
Auditor Follow-up and Close-out Verification:
Auditor Signature:
Date Deficiency closed:
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

Page : 7 - 7
Annex F01702 Audit Summary

AUDIT SUMMARY
ID A01702
Project:
Construction Audit Number:
Client:
Audit Dates:
Project Number:
Report Date:
Audit Location:
Audit Scope:
Summary of Audit Results:
Entry Meeting Date:
Exit Meeting Date:
The entry & exit meeting were conducted with:

A summary of the audit results is as follows:
Quality Manual Principles assessed.
Quality Manual Principles found to be satisfactory.
Deficiencies reported.
Observations for improvement.
Previous Findings and Action Follow-up:

Finding Number
Lead Auditor Signature:
Status (Open or Closed)
Date Closed
Date:
PROCEDURE
Cdigo: K101-QC-PL-PR-003
Versin : 0
INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN
Pgina : 1 - 7
Annex 3
PROCEDURE: INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 2 - 7
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
OBJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
SCOPE
3.
RESPONSABILITIES
4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFINITIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.
PROCEDURE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.
ANNEXES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 3 - 7
1.
OBJECT
The purpose of This Work instruction is to identify the requirements for preparation and
use of the Inspection and Testing Plan (ITP).
2.
SCOPE
This work instruction is applied to the Quality activities realized to the projects carried out
by MEP which include preparation, control and implementation of the Inspection and
Testing Plan (ITP).
3.
RESPONSABILITIES
Project Manager is the responsible for the management of this Work Instruction.
Prior to begin the construction activities, QAQC Field Manager and Project Manager are
responsible for the preparation and implementation of the Inspection and Testing Plan
(ITP). Project Manager shares responsibility of the application and performance of the
quality control program.
He is responsible for the compilation, updating and distribution of the Inspection and
Testing Plan as well as to ensure the coherence of the requirements presented in this
work instruction.
QAQC Field Manager shall check and evaluate the ITP and Field Quality Plan of the work
in progress continually, at least once a year.
QAQC Field Manager will be in charge of the implementation of every aspect of the
application of quality requirements during the construction, tests and pre-commissioning
phases of the project until Mechanical Compliance.
Functions of QAQC Equipment may include being witness of the inspections made by
other, the performance of inspections or additional tests, performance and coordination of
Quality Control Activities, technical assistance provision, evaluation of the reports
accuracy and integrity, and the maintenance of the Quality Control files.
For the responsibility of the elements defined in ITP in the column of Contractors, a direct
person responsible of the complete activity will be nominated. This person may be an
Area Superintendent, Contractors Supervisor or Subcontract Coordinator.
Regardless of the specific responsibility assignments, general intent and requirements of
the work instruction herein must be understood and respected by the whole site
personnel. Copies of the ITP will be distributed to people who have responsibility
assigned by the QAQC Manager.
Under certain circumstances, the assigned personnel with QAQC responsibilities will
delegate the practice of the Quality Control activities to other competent person. This
delegation of activities shall in no way relieve the assigned personnel the last
responsibility of the activity.
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 4 - 7
4.
DEFINITIONS
4.1. QUALITY ASSURANCE
Organized schedule for the verification and documentation of every inspection needed,
evaluations and tests which have been performed to guarantee the conformity with all the
codes, regulations, project drawings and specification determined in the Inspection and
Testing Plan.
4.2. QUALITY CONTROL
Organized schedule for the inspections, controls and tests performed by qualified and
specialized personnel under guidance of written procedures which require clearly defined
documentation to guarantee all the construction activities including manufacturing,
assembly and installation will be performed in accordance with the drawings,
specifications, codes and regulations approved.
4.3. Inspection and Testing Construction Plan
It is a process properly documented which lets the systematic and routing control of every
activity which affects quality.
This process is carried out through comparison, tests, measures and inspections to
obtain objective evidence in the establishment of quality compliances in construction and
assembly works Acceptance Criteria.
4.4. CONFORMANCE REGISTER
Written documents in which materials or methodology used fulfill the requirements of
pertinent codes and specifications depending of work requirements.
5.
PROCEDURE
5.1. GENERAL
Inspection and Testing Plan (ITP) (F70002 Inspection and Test Plan 2) sets:
Acceptance.Criterion
Inspection and Testing Length
Required Documents.
Responsible people for inspection.
In the corresponding sections of Construction Specifications will be checked to identify

the acceptance criterion and the right reference (s), it is added to ITP a column named
Acceptance Criteria.
Along with the Quality Control Forms. ITP requires presenting the inspection / tests
documentation which have been done and accepted by the appropriate parts.
In accordance to ITP, the tests inspectors will be witnesses and should prepare
documentation (Quality Control Forms) as set forth in the ITP.
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 5 - 7
QAQC Field personnel will make sure the corresponding documentation in the ITP
(Quality Control Forms) is followed and also the requirements set forth in the ITP are
fulfilled.
Inspection and Testing Plan shall be furnished by the Construction Manager and QAQC
Field Manager when the work starts. Both shall give a general vision to subcontractors by
defining their responsibilities with regard to the implementation of
General Quality
Project Plan. During the Mobilization Plan, QAQC Manager shall prepare and check the
Quality Plans to determine the compliance of quality of the contract.
Field Manager shall have a copy of the Inspection and Testing Plan in the work.
Inspection and Testing Plan shall be created by the QAQC team of the project, focusing
primarily in the Constructive Quality Process Control.
The main actions to be performed in the Quality area for the compliance of this Plan are
as follows:
Establish a Quality Plan of the Project.
Establish the Inspection and Testing Plan.
Manage the Project Quality File.
Reposting Quality Documents to the Client.
Provide counseling, audits and technical management for laboratories of material and
test equipment for Supervision and Subcontractors.
Guide the implementation of the Quality Control in the project.
Develop quality inspections and verifications.
Elaborate QA/QC reports.
Develop inspections and Quality analysis.
Control the effective Quality Control Notarization.
All documentation related to the Quality of the Project is responsibility of QAQC field area.
These may be protocols, data sheet, checklist and other special reports or any other
suitable document which must contain the following information.
Reference to the Quality Control instruction applied.
Identification of inspected elements
Reference to other documentation as: drawings, procedures and specifications not
pointed in the Quality Control Instruction.
Method used for inspection.
Supervisors signature (who carried out the inspection).
Inspection date
Inspection results, including the Non-conformance.in case of refusal.
All the information related to Quality Control will be ordered, grouped and filed to ease the
work of Pre operational tests and deliver it to the client.
The best form to order the quality documentation is to separate it in Area, System,
subsystem and equipments (an so forth) then every area will have its documentation
related to every discipline(civil, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, piping, structural
steel, buildings, etc.) complete.
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 6 - 7
Every system will have its Notarization of each specialty and every equipment will also
have its own Notarization and Acceptance.
QAQC Field Manager is responsible of this information, its reposting and the client final
acceptance
5.2. FIELD INSPECTION REPORT (FIR)
Field Inspection Report is the primary means to document all the field activities and
inspections in absence of more specific protocols, its use combined with additional
protocols included in this section summarize a complete track record of the field activities.
Its functions are as follows:
Record the compliance of codes, regulations and specifications through a written,
signed and dated report.
Provide a more precisely method to record the field labor, replacing logbooks and
complementing required Protocols.
Provide a recording method for those areas which do not have such documentation.
Field Inspection Records are designed in such a way that may be used to record almost
any type of activity or inspection, next a description of some of the primarily uses of this
Form:
Record the whole troublesome area or non conformance reports, such activity must be
recorded separately in individual forms.
Record the whole activity which has reached the end of its activities successfully or
inspections of an article (group or similar groups) performed in a date in accordance
with the section especially of the Checklist.
Record in progress or final inspections. The owners acceptance of the final inspection
will be indicated by the owner representatives signature in the corresponding section
of the Form.
Record the satisfactory completion of a work process or several similar processes.
Provide basis to create every extra protocol necessary to adapt to the needs of a
project a particular inspection.
Written registers will be those specified in the Quality Control Checklist, where two or
more registers, separated in a bar, any of them will be used depending on the contract
documents, type of activity or the adaptability of other protocols.
Every certified report, factory test report, conformance certificate and head office report
must be filed on field.
With the purpose to provide an accurate methodology to keep and recover the
documented information, it will be needed an organized approach for filing the Quality
Control Protocols.
These files will be divided into numbered sections as set forth in the Quality Control
Checklist.
All the documentation will be kept in files which will be under the QAQC Field Manager
control.
Every record and report will reflect the section belonging to the Checklist and will be filed
with its corresponding documentation (including x-rays and laboratory tests) in the section
corresponding to the files
PROCEDURE
Versin : 0
Pgina : 7 - 7
5.3.
FILES CONSERVATION
At the end of each Project, every testing report of QAQC will be filed in Dossier folders.
6.
ANNEXES
-
Inspection and Test Plan 2.
Inspection and Test Plan
Activity
Inspection and Test Plan

Description
Client
Item
Project Name
Contractor
Inspection/Test Stage
Project Location
Contract Number
Requirement and
Acceptance Criteria
Inspection Legend:
P = Perform
I = Inspection
T = Test
R = Review and Approve
W = Witness (Notification of authorized inspection personnel required)
H = Hold (Mandatory, do not proceed without presence of authorized inspection personnel or signed waiver)
Project Number
Issue Date
Document Number
ITP 509 FXXXX
Revision 0
Scope of Inspection
Responsibility
Mota
Engil
Responsibility Legend:
CS = Fluor Construction Supervision
CEM = Fluor Construction Engineering Manager
QI = Fluor Quality Inspector
CWI = Fluor Certified Welding Inspector
RI = Fluor Receiving Inspector
NDE = Certified NDE Examiner
Fluor
Client
Inspection/T
est Record
Completion
Sign-Off
Fluor
Client
PROCEDURE
ACQUAINTANCE OF QUALITY PLAN
INSTRUCTIVE
Version : 0
Page : 1 de 4
Annex 4
PROCEDURE: ACQUAINTANCE OF QUALITY PLAN INSTRUCTIVE
PROCEDURE
INSTRUCTIVE
Version : 0
Page : 2 de 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OBJECT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SCOPE
------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
3. RESPONSABILITIES
4. DEFINITIONS
--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1.
QUALITY ASSURANCES
------------------------------------------------------
4.2.
QUALITY CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------------
4.3.
ASSURANCE EQUIPMENT
5. PROCEDURE
5.1.
GENERAL
6. ANNEXES
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE
INSTRUCTIVE
1.
Version : 0
Page : 3 de 4
OBJECT
The purpose or this Work instruction is to declare the authority of the Quality Plan K101QC-PL.001 in this Project.
2.
SCOPE
This Work instruction applies to the construction process activities realized in the field by
the whole personnel of Mota-Engil.
3.
RESPONSABILITIES
Project Manager is responsible for the implementation of this Work Instruction during the
whole Project.
QAQC Manager on field is responsible to guarantee this work instructive is known for all
the people involved.
4.
DEFINITIONS
4.1. QUALITY ASSURANCE
An organized program for the verification and documentation of all the necessary
inspections, tests, trials performed to guarantee compliance with all the codes, regulations,
project drawings and specifications determined in the Inspection and testing Plan.
4.2. QUALITY CONTROL
An organized schedule of inspections, controls and tests performed by qualified and
specialized personnel under the guidance of written procedures which require
documentation defined clearly to guarantee all the construction activities, including
manufacturing, assembly and installation are carried out in accordance with the approved
drawings, specifications, codes and regulations.
4.3. ASSURANCE EQUIPMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL ON FIELD
Person or people nominated are responsible for the implementation of procedures
comprised in the Quality Management Manual in this work instructive.
5.
PROCEDURE
5.1. GENERAL
QA / QC manager on field shall guarantee the quality management plan is known and
applied during the whole project for the constructive control process.
6.
ANNEXES
-
MEP-GRH-PR003.03 Attendance list for training
PROCEDURE
Version : 0

INSTRUCTIVE
Page : 4 de 4
MEP-GRH-PR003.03 Attendance list for training

Tipo : Formato
LISTA DE ASISTENCIA
Cdigo:
MEP-GRH-PR003.03
Versin:
O2
Pgina:
1 de 1
DATOS DEL EMPLEADOR

Actividad Econmica
Razn Social o Denominacin Social
N de tra ba ja dores en el Centro

La bora l
RUC
DATOS DEL EVENTO (especificar)

Sede Central
Obra (especificar)
Otros
Lugar (Direccin, distrito, departamento, provincia) :
Fecha:
rea / Entidad Capacitadora:
Hora Inicio:
Nombre y Apellido del capacitador o entrenador / Cargo:
Hora Fin:
Total de Horas:
Tipo de Evento (seleccionar cualquiera de las alternativas)
Capacitacin
Entrenamiento
Charla de inicio de Jornada
Curso
Taller
Charla Stop
Induccin
Seminario
Workshop
Sensibilizacin
Simulacro de Emergencia
Otros (especificar)
TEMAS TRATADOS EN EL EVENTO
DATOS DE LOS PARTICIPANTES

N
APELLIDOS Y NOMBRES
CARGO
AREA
EMPRESA
DNI
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(*) Mediante mi firma puesta en la presente Lista de Asistencia, certifico haber sido instruido sobre el tema tratado en el evento y me comprometo a dar fiel
cumplimiento a las instrucciones sealadas en este evento.
OBSERVACIONES:
FIRMA DEL EXPOSITOR:
DATOS DEL RESPONSABLE DEL REGISTRO

Nombre y Apellido:
Cargo:
Fecha:
Firma:
FIRMA (*)
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
QUALITY CONTROL FORMS
Page : 1 de 3
Annex 5
PROCEDURE: QUALITY CONTROL FORMS
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 2 de 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
OBJECT
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
SCOPE ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
3.
RESPONSABILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------
4.
PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1.
GENERAL ---------------------------------------------------------
----------
5.
REFERENCES ------------------------------------------------------------------
6.
ANNEX ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 3 de 3
1.
OBJECT
The purpose of this work instruction is to provide the necessary forms for quality control
activities of land in the project.
2.
SCOPE
This work instruction applies to all Quality Control activities that are performed in the field
under the supervision of MEP.
3.
RESPONSABILITIES
The Project Manager and Construction Manager Land are responsible for the
administration of this work instruction.
The QAQC Manager is responsible for the implementation of this work instruction.
The QAQC Manager is responsible for the distribution of quality control formats and
maintaining quality control records.
4.
PROCEDURE
4.1.
GENERAL
The Quality Control forms included in this work instruction is to be used for document
inspection and testing activities in the field according to the inspection of the Project and
F70002 Rev 0 2 Inspection and Test Plan (ITP). Copies of the completed forms must be
kept by the Head QAQC. The list of Quality Control formats is described in Annex Forms
F000 OO-509 Index, the quality manual Fluor.
5.
REFERENCES
Fluor: Quality Manual
6.
ANNEX
-
Annex OO-509 F000 Forms Index, the forms specified in the Quality Manual
PROCEDURE
CODE:K101-QC-PL-PR-006
Version:0
MEASUREMENT AND TESTING EQUIPMENT

Page: 1 -5
Annex 6
PROCEDURE: MEASUREMENT AND TESTING EQUIPMENT
PROCEDURE
Version:0

Page: 2 -5
TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE
1. OBJECT ..............................................................................................................3
2. SCOPE .................................................................................................................... 3
3. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 3
4. RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................... 3
5.1
PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN SITE ...................................................................... 3
5.2
QA/QCMANAGER .................................................................................................. 3
5.3
HSE MANAGER ..................................................................................................... 3
5.4
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISORS ....................................................................... 3
5. REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................ 4
6.1
GENERAL............................................................................................................... 4
6.2
EQUIPMENT CONTROL ....................................................................................... 5
6. ANNEXES ........................................................................................................... 6
PROCEDURE
Version:0

Page: 3 -5
1.
OBJECT
This Procedure describes the Quality system related to calibration and Measurement and
Testing Equipment Control (MTE) used to verify construction work.
2.
SCOPE
This Procedure is applied to every MTE to be used in tests and verification of quality
processes which require calibration to specific intervals.
Calibrations must be performed by firms registered and certified by the national entity
(INDECOPI), if the national entity finds non registered and certified firms for some
calibrations and testings; these may be performed by reputation supported firms.
This procedure is not applied to measurement equipment contained in stock like rules,
bands or levels which are subject to changes or modifications during use.
3.
REFERENCES
- Kf01101revc Calibration Assignment Log
- Recommendations, Parameters And Catalogues Furnished By The Representatives Of
-
4.
The Different Testing Teams.

The Equipments to be sent for external calibration should have the previous certification
and atmospheric data of work area should be attached.
RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN SITE
Responsible for the global implementation of This Procedure and ensure their
effectiveness in the Control of field.
4.2. QA/QC MANAGER
Responsible to establish and manage the system to control the MTE used in the scope of
this procedure.
4.3. HSE MANAGER

Responsible to control calibration certificates of every MTE which are used for
measurements of pollutants and radiation indicators within due date limits.
4.4. CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISORS
They are in charge of verifying and controlling on field every MTE used in the activities of
the Project keep calibrated.
Assure the entire personnel have the documentation related to MTE and its proper
performance.
They shall be directly responsible calibration certificates of every MTE used in the
construction activities are within the due date limits and keep a record of them on field.
PROCEDURE
Version:0

Page: 4 -5
5.
REQUIREMENTS
5.1
GENERAL
QA/QC Manager will organize the calibration and precision verification of MTE which will
be realized through precision tolerance and calibration frequency established by the
manufacturer of the equipment as long as it is provided.
Calibration by the manufacturer or representative will be valid until the due date pointed
out in the corresponding Calibration Certificate, in the absence of the due date the
Manufacturers Calibration Certificate will be valid for one (1) year.
If the MTE does not have the Manufacturers or Representatives Calibration Certificate
then it will be calibrated by certified firms for INDECOPI.
The personnel of the Project must know the requirements and equipment covered by the
MTE instructions or procedures of the project.
Calibration records will be kept through Documentary Control according to the project
procedures.
5.2. EQUIPMENT CONTROL
Engineering supervisors will decide which tools, instruments and equipment require
calibration and according to this a master list of MTE of the project will be created. Project
Requirements for a proper storage and maintenance of MTE will be established. Controls
for withdrawal and calibration of MTE within established intervals will be set up.
The project will provide procedures for the use of MTE, for documentation of accepted
work while MTE is used and for its control to be used outside the protected warehouse.
Every item which requires calibration will be identified through a series number. A label or
self-adhesive where physically possible, series number and calibration due date Work
procedures will describe the calibration methods and MTE adjustment for those which are
calibrated by the personnel of the project.
When the Engineering Supervisor or any other person directly involved with MTE use
consider that the precision of any item or equipment is objectionable, it will be subject to
precision verification and re-calibration.
When MTE precision fails, loses or damages to fulfill with the requirements, it will carry out
and document an examination of inspections results and tests prior to failure.
6.
ANNEXES
F01101 Calibration Assignment Log
PROCEDURE
Version:0

Page: 5 -5
F01101 Calibration Assignment Log
CALIBRATIONASSIGNMENTLOGANDRECORD
Equipment/Instrument
IdentificationNo.
Item Description
Size-Range
Manufacturer
Model No.
Manufacturer
Serial No
CalibrationFrequency
IDA01101
CalibrationTolerance
DateCalibrated
CalibrationDue Date
PROCEDURE
TRAINING PROGRAM
Version : 0
Page : 1 de 4
Annex 7
MANAGEMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
PROCEDURE: PERSONNEL TRAINING PROGRAM
CODIGO: K101-QC-PL-PR-007
PROCEDURE
TRAINING PROGRAM
Version : 0
Page : 2 de 4
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. OBJECT___________________________________________________
2. SCOPE____________________________________________________
3. DEFINITIONS______________________________________________
4. GENERAL CONDITIONS______________________________________
5. PROCEDURE_______________________________________________
6. ANNEXES__________________________________________________
PROCEDURE
TRAINING PROGRAM
Version : 0
Page : 3 de 4
1.
OBJECT
Establish current mechanisms of the company to carry out the Personnel Training Procedure
2.
SCOPE
It is applied to the whole personnel who work in Mota-Engil as well as direct and indirect of the
project. The responsibility to coordinate the training process will be the QA/QC Manager together
with his crew.
3.
DEFINITIONS
Training: Teaching-Learning process guided to provide people knowledge, develop abilities,

and adjust their attitudes and expertise to be able to reach the objectives in their work.
Internal Training: It means the training process taught by a companys employee to a group of
people who work in the organization. There are two types of internal training, concepts updating
and new concepts and knowledge learning.
External Training: It means the programs offered by external suppliers who can be hired prior
appliance, authorization of the area manager and schedule of the Human Management Area.
4.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The quality manager and supervisors shall coordinate training for each process according to the
procedure 000.509.0090.
The quality manager shall coordinate with Human Management for elaborating a training plan
depending to the detection of needs for training in accordance with quality manual procedure issued
by Fluor 000.509.0140 corrective measures and000.509.0150 preventive measures
5.
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION
Step 1: Quality Manager will detect if there is need for training in quality topics therefore He will
coordinate with the different areas about the day and time.
Step 2: Tell the workers in the 5 min. daily chat about the scope of this one.
Step 3: The QA/QC Manager shall determine who will be the person in charge of performing the
training in accordance to his degree of education.
Step 4: the personnel in charge of performing the chat shall asks the involved personnel to sign
the form F01801
PROCEDURE
TRAINING PROGRAM
Version : 0
Page : 4 de 4
6.
ANNEXES
F01801: PROJECT SPECIFIC QUALIT TRAINING
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Cdigo:K101-QC-PL-PR-008
Versin : 0
Pgina : 1 de 11
Annex 8
PROCEDURE: SUBCONTRACTORS QUALIFICATION
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 1 de 11
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
SCOPE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
GENERAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.
PROCEDURE ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.1.
4.
QUALIFICATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS------------------------------
FORMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 2 de 11
SITE SUBCONTRACTOR QUALIFICATION
1.
SCOPE
This procedure describes the initial qualification of site subcontractors. This procedure does not
apply to subcontractors that have been previously approved by Fluor or the Owner.
2.
GENERAL
When qualifications of site subcontractors include an evaluation of the Quality capabilities of the
subcontractor, the evaluation shall be done in accordance with this procedure.
3.
PROCEDURE
3.1.
Qualification of Subcontractors
Contracts Administrator
Upon selection of a proposed subcontractor, the Contracts Administrator shall notify the
Site Quality Manager and request a subcontractor qualification be performed. When
construction has designated someone to technically supervise the proposed
subcontractor, he shall also be notified.
NOTE: The Contracts Administrator shall contact the subcontractor relative to the
obtaining of documents, arranging of communication or establishment of meetings and/or
visits.
Site Quality Manager/Technical Supervisor
Upon notification (including receipt of subcontractor quality programs), review the

qualifications of the proposed subcontractor based upon the quality requirements to
be included in the Fluor subcontract. This review may include meetings and/or visits
with the subcontractor candidate. The Site Quality Manager may use the "Site
Subcontractor Qualification" guidelines (Form 000.509.F02001); however, this guide
does not necessarily represent the quality requirements to the subcontractor and
therefore should be used only as an aid to the evaluation. The Technical Supervisor
should use the applicable "Evaluation Record" (Forms 000.509.F02002 and
000.509.F02006).
Upon completion of the subcontractor qualification review, notify the Contracts

Administrator of the results of the review and perform the actions stated below (as
appropriate):
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 3 de 11
If the subcontractor is not qualified, write a memo to the Contracts Administrator

fully explaining the exact deficiencies that are required to be corrected along with
the specific recommendations.
If the subcontractor is qualified, complete the "Site Subcontractor Qualification"
form and evaluation record and forward to the Contracts Administrator.
If the subcontractor is "conditionally" qualified, complete and forward the "Site
Subcontractor Qualification" form as above, however include the specific limitations
and/or actions that will be required.
4.
Site Quality Manager/Technical Supervisor
Process contractor qualification documents in accordance with the Document Control

Section in the SPM and procedure 000.509.0160 (Quality Records).
FORMS
Quality Control Forms:
-
000.509.F02001 - Site Subcontractor Qualification

000.509.F02002 - Soil Testing Laboratory Evaluation Record
000.509.F02003 - Asphalt Testing Laboratory Evaluation Record
000.509.F02004 - Concrete Batch Plant Evaluation Record
000.509.F02005 - Concrete Testing Laboratory Evaluation Record
000.509.F02006 - NDE Subcontractor Evaluation Record
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 4 de 11
000.509.F02001 - Site Subcontractor Qualification

-
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 5 de 11
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 6 de 11
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 7 de 11
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 8 de 11
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 9 de 11
PROCEDURE
SUBCONTRACTORS
QUALIFICATION
Versin : 0
Pgina : 10 de 11
PROCEDURE
RECEPTION OF MATERIAL
Version : 0
Page : 1 of 6
Annex 9
PROCEDURE: RECEPCION OF MATERIALS
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 2 of 6
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
PURPOSE
_______________________________________________________
2.
SCOPE __________________________________________________________
3.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
_________________________________________
4.
DEFINITIONS _____________________________________________________
5.
PROCEDURE
_____________________________________________________
6.
ANNEXES
____________________________________________________
PROCEDURE
1.
Version : 0
Page : 3 of 6
PURPOSE
This procedure is intended to establish the next steps for inspection in receiving materials
supplied by our customer.
2.
SCOPE
This procedure applies to materials and consumables used in this project, which directly
affect the manufacturing process.
3.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
4.
Standars applicable to this project: ASTM (A53, whichever applied)

240K-C2-05-002 SITE QUALITY MANUAL (000 509 0230)
DEFINITIONS
Materials and / or consumables.-are those materials used in the manufacturing
process. The materials to be inspected as they directly affect the manufacturing process
are:
Steel pipe, Profiles, Angles, Plates, Round, Square round and Rectangular pipes, etc.
Paint, Resin, Catalyst, Solvent, Thinner and Sand / Grit.
Bolts, Nuts, Washers, Studs, Clamps, Flanges and Elbows
Purchase Order. - Document in which they purchased from a supplier.
Referral Guide. - Document by which the descriptions and quantities of materials
shipped by the supplier are indicated.
Quality Certificate. - Document evidencing the destructive and non destructive tests
applied to manufacturers materials.
5.
PROCEDURE
5.1
PREVIOUS ACTIVITIES
5.1.1
The quality inspector will follow the Topics Inspection Plan established for
Receiving Materials purchased for a project, which will be conducted
throughout the procedure outlined.
5.1.2
Warehouse shall apply to the Quality Area the verification of materials and /
or supplies when they are delivered by our client.
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
Page : 4 of 6
5.1.3 The quality inspector verifies that the materials which are going to enter
have their corresponding technical construction characteristics f, materials
must be typed for identification (in the case of cast steel, batch number for
paints, etc. )
5.2.
SEQUENCE
5.1.4 The Quality Inspector verifies though material oulet order, if the material
acquired corresponds to the technical specifications.
5.1.5 The quality inspector comes to inspect the material characteristics and the
requirements that apply for the type of material.
5.1.6 It shall carry out the proper receipt and inspection report in forms F02301,
F02501
5.1.7 When found a non conformance, communicate immediately the QA / QC

Manager and F01301 and issue the form (240K-C2-05-002 SITE QUALITY
MANUAL)
5.1.8 If there is no material according to the outlet guide is found; an orange label
with the form F01303 (240K-C2-05-002 SITE QUALITY MANUAL)
5.1.9 Deficiencies or damages observed on material delivered by Fluor warehouse

must be reported to Fluor QA.
6.
ANNEXES
F02301: RECEIVING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
F02501: STORAGE INSPECTION CKECKLIST
PROCEDURE
F02301: RECEIVING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Version : 0
Page : 5 of 6
PROCEDURE
F02501: STORAGE INSPECTION CKECKLIST
Version : 0
Page : 6 of 6
PROCEDURE
PROCEDURE FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 1 - 6
Annex 10
GERENCIA DE ASEGURAMIENTO Y CONTROL DE CALIDAD
PROCEDURE FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
CODE : K101-QC-PL-PR-010
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 2 - 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.
PURPOSE
2.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
3.
DEFINITIONS
4.
DEVELOPMENT
5.
MODE OF ACCEPTANCE
6.
ANNEXES
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 3 - 6
1.
PURPOSE
This procedure establishes the guidelines to be followed for the materials and equipment
storage activities.
2.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Quality Manual 240K-C2-OT-05-002 Rev. 0
Design drawings, manufacturing, metal structure detail and assembly.
Supply Order.
Standards:
-
Standard Specifications of materials for the structure according to the Contract

Documents and the entities AISC, ASTM, AWS.
3.
DEFINITIONS
Materials: Those which have been selected as a result of designs and calculations
and to withstand loads of equipment, fixtures and fittings
Storage : Specific area to store items supplied by the customer
4.
DEVELOPMENT
Previous Requirements.
Have the standards and specifications of the contract documents and specifications of
the design drawings and specifications or standards of AISC, ASTM, AWS and ISO
9000 NTP for materials and equipments.
Have the quantity estimates of materials and equipment.
Have the documentation for the materials reception and storage application.
Provide personnel and equipment for handling material as well as reception and
storage areas or zones.
Have hand tools to check the dimensions of the material, as well as equipment and
personnel to handle such materials.
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 4 - 6
Specification, classification, handling, storage y preservation.

Ensure the materials for the metal structure are checked and are in accordance with
the standards and specifications of the contract documents and specifications or
regulations of design drawings specifications or standards, AISC, ASTM, AWS and
ISO 9000 NTP as applied to have requested the materials.
Ensure the material characteristics match the application documents:
-
Material Supply Order

As well as to comply with the respective standards and specifications with which the
materials have been ordered, which will issue F02501 form.
Materials will be classified in accordance to Fluor Quality Plan 240k-C2-0T-05-002 (00

5090250) which describes 5 storage levels.
Handle materials
Manipulate materials through trained personnel and equipment (cranes, forklifts) in
good condition to avoid injury or damage to materials
Materials shall be stored in rooms or areas defined and implemented, which will have
the security and environmental conditions to prevent damage or deterioration on long
storage periods, status of materials preservation shall be valuated to additional
intervals and provide their conservation which will be done through F02502 form.
5.
MODE OF ACCEPTANCE
The process is acceptable when it has followed the guidelines given herein.
As documents which ensure the implementation of this procedure, consider the following:
Documentation about the material (Supply Order, Purchase Order and Receipt Note),
F02501 form.
Documentation about the material location in the storage zone or area, F02501 form.
6.
ANNEXES
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 5 - 6
F02501: STORAGE INSPECTION CHECKLIST
PROCEDURE
Version : 0
EQUIPMENT
Page : 6 - 6
F02502: EQUIPMENT PROTECTION PRESERVATION AND INSPECTION RECORD

K101-QC-PL.001 - Quality Plan - Rev 0 PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

K101-QC-PL.001 - Quality Plan - Rev 0 PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Code: K101-QC-PL.

OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS

DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

Inspection and Testing plans

Project Management Commitment

Customers Approach Coordination with Fluor Canada Ltd.

Quality Management System Plan

Responsibility, Authority and Communication

Product Realization Planning

Processes related to the Client

Production y Service Provision

Monitoring and Measurement Equipment Control

ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

Monitoring and Measurement

Product Non Conformance Control

OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

Multi-plate tunnels Installation.

MECHANIC WORK AND PIPELINES

Carbon Steel pipeline assembly, diameter equal to 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 y 36.

NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS

DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

PROJECT QMS: has the following process:

QUALITY PROYECT PLAN (Planning): Quality Plan and its annexes

MOBILIZATION PROCESS DIAGRAM OF DOCUMENTS

INSPECTION AND TESTING PLANS

FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSABILITIES

PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT

It is the Project managers commitment, representing MEP, the implementation of SCG of

CUSTOMER APPROACH - COORDINATIONS WITH FLUOR CANADA LTD.

QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING

Quality chats: once a month

RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION

5.5.1 Responsibility and Authority

ORGANIZATION OF QA / QC PROJECT K101

b. Eng. Chief Construction (CHC)

c. Technical Office Manager (TOM)

e. Quality Office Manager (QOM)

Depends hierarchically of GP and functionally of Quality Management Chief of MEP.

5.5.2 Direction Representative in the Quality Area

5.6.1 Entrance information and Revision Results

PRODUCT REALIZATION PLANNING

PROCESSES RELATED TO THE CLIENT

7.2.1 Communication con el Client

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Created by Fluor Canada Ltd.

PURCHASES: MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED TO THE WORK.

PRODUCTION Y SERVICE PROVISION

7.5.1 Production Control and Service Provision

Certificates of welders qualification and Welding Processes

7.5.5. Product Conservation

CONTROL OF MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT

ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT

Verify the implementation of corrective actions and record the effectiveness.

The Chief Auditor is responsible for:

Non Conformance Product Control (NC)

Procedure K101-QC-PL-PR-001, to identify and management of deviations according to

8.4.1. Continuous Improvement

PREVENTIVE AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Page _of _