Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Submitted by:
ADIL KHAN
(BM-014012)
Faculty Guide:
Prof. Vijendra Dhyani
DECLARATION
I, Adil Khan , PGDM student of Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad declare that the
project entitled CONSUMER BUYING PATTERN TOWARDS AMUL MILK, is the
original work done by me and the information provided in the study is authentic to the best of
my knowledge.
Place:
ADIL KHAN
Date:
Signature
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
2
In the first place, I thank IMS GHAZIABAD for giving me an opportunity to work on this
project. I would also like to thank Mr. VIJENDRA DHYANI, Professor Marketing, IMS
GHAZIABAD for giving me his valuable guidance for the project. Without his help it would
have been impossible for me to complete the project.
I would be failing in my duty if I do not acknowledge with a deep sense of gratitude the
sacrifices made by my parents and thus have helped me in completing the project work
successfully.
Place: Ghaziabad
Date:
ADILKHAN
(BM 014012)
2014-2016
PREFACE
Today the business environment is rapidly changing in this competitive environment the popular
trend is also striving for maintaining its positions therefore it become essential for the companies
that they should know about their preference & taste. Regarding a particular product it is of
almost necessary to know the consumers satisfaction to the value offered by the company in case
of dissatisfactory result it is essential to ascertain whether the dissatisfaction is for entire product
or part of it is and what value do the consumers expect from it?
The research will provide the relevant information to the organization about consumers
attitude towards their products & services.
The research work is sincere effort to find out the ultimate requirement of consumers for the
betterment of research as well as the organization.
S.NO
Contents
Page No.
Executive Synopsis
Introduction
Industry scenario
27
35
Literature review
36
Research Methodology
43
Analysis
44
Findings
66
Recommendations
67
11
Conclusion
68
12
References
69
13
Annexure
70
TABLE OF CONTENT
S.NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PAGE .NO
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
54
56
10
preference
Crosstab b/w satisfaction & variant
58
11
of amul milk.
One sample T-test
64
12
65
EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS
This final project was undertaken with the objective of CONSUMER BUYING PATTERN
TOWARS AMUL MILK
In the year 1946 the first milk union was established. This union was started with 250 litre of
milk per day. In the year 1955 AMUL was established. In the year 1946 the union was known as
KAIRA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION. This union selected the
brand name AMUL in 1955.
The brand name Amul means AMULYA. This word derived from the Sanskrit word
AMULYA which means priceless. A quality control expert in Anand had suggested the brand
name AMUL. Amul products have been in use in millions of homes since 1946. Amul Butter,
Amul Milk Powder, Amul Ghee, Amulspray, Amul Cheese, Amul Chocolates, Amul Shrikhand,
Amul Ice cream, Nutramul, Amul Milk and Amulya have made Amul a leading food brand in
India. (The total sale is Rs. 6 billion in 2005). Today Amul is a symbol of many things like of the
high-quality products sold at reasonable prices, of the genesis of a vast co-operative network, of
the triumph of indigenous technology, of the marketing savvy of a farmers' organization. And
have a proven model for dairy development (Generally known as ANAND PATTERN).
I worked with questionnaire ,a sample size of 50 respondents was taken for the study whose
responses were studied and interpreted .The sampling design was used convenience sampling.
The process of analysis was done through excel work sheets, frequency table, percentage
analysis, cross-tabulation, t-test, Annova test.
During the preparation of questionnaire I faced difficulties regarding the selection of questions
and in collection of the data I found some difficulties like the customers had no time to give.
INTRODUCTION
Amul is an Indian dairy cooperative, based at Anand in the state of Gujarat, India. The
word amul () is derived from the Sanskrit word amulya (), meaning rare,
valuable. The co-operative was initially referred to as Anand Milk Federation Union Limited
hence the name AMUL.
Formed in 1946, it is a brand managed by a cooperative body, the Gujarat Co-operative Milk
Marketing Federation Ltd. (GCMMF), which today is jointly owned by 3.6 million milk
producers in Gujarat.
Amul spurred India's White Revolution, which made the country the world's largest producer of
milk and milk products. In the process Amul became the largest food brand in India and has
ventured into markets overseas.
Dr. Verghese Kurien, founder-chairman of the GCMMF for more than 30 years (19732006), is
credited with the success of Amul.
The seeds of this unusual saga were sown more than 65 years back in Anand, a small town in the
state of Gujarat in western India. The exploitative trade practices followed by the local trade
cartel triggered off the cooperative movement. Angered by unfair and manipulative practices
followed by the trade, the farmers of the district approached the great Indian patriot Sardar
Vallabhbhai Patel for a solution. He advised them to get rid of middlemen and form their own cooperative, which would have procurement, processing and marketing under their control.
In 1946, the farmers of this area went on a milk strike refusing to be cowed down by the cartel.
Under the inspiration of Sardar Patel, and the guidance of leaders like Morarji Desai and
Tribhuvandas Patel, they formed their own cooperative in 1946.
This co-operative, the Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. began with just
two village dairy co-operative societies and 247 litres of milk and is today better known as Amul
Dairy. Amul grew from strength to strength thanks to the inspired leadership of Tribhuvandas
Patel, the founder Chairman and the committed professionalism of Dr Verghese Kurien,who was
entrusted the task of running the dairy from 1950.
The then Prime Minister of India, Lal Bahadur Shastri decided that the same approach should
become the basis of a National Dairy Development policy. He understood that the success of
Amul could be attributed to four important factors. The farmers owned the dairy, their elected
representatives managed the village societies and the district union, they employed professionals
to operate the dairy and manage its business. Most importantly, the co-operatives were sensitive
to the needs of farmers and responsive to their demands.
9
At his instance in 1965 the National Dairy Development Board was set up with the basic
objective of replicating the Amul model. Dr. Kurien was chosen to head the institution as its
Chairman and asked to replicate this model throughout the country.
10
GCMMF
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. (GCMMF), is India's largest food
product marketing organisation with annual turnover (2014-15) US$ 3.4 billion. Its daily milk
procurement is approx 14.85 million lit per day from 18,536 village milk cooperative
societies, 17 member unions covering 31 districts, and 3.37 million milk producer members.
It is the Apex organisation of the Dairy Cooperatives of Gujarat, popularly known
as'AMUL',which aims to provide remunerative returns to the farmers and also serve the interest
of consumers by providing quality products which are good value for money. Its success has not
only been emulated in India but serves as a model for rest of the World. It is exclusive marketing
organisation of 'Amul' and 'Sagar' branded products. It operates through 56 Sales Offices and
has a dealer network of 10000 dealers and 10 lakh retailers, one of the largest such networks in
India. Its product range comprises milk, milk powder, health beverages, ghee, butter, cheese,
Pizza cheese,Ice-cream, Paneer, chocolates, and traditional Indian sweets, etc.
GCMMF is India's largest exporter of Dairy Products. It has been accorded a "Trading
House"status. Many of our products are available in USA, Gulf Countries,Singapore, The
11
Philippines, Japan, China and Australia. GCMMF has received the APEDA Award from
Government of India for Excellence in Dairy Product Exports for the last 16 years. For the year
2009-10, GCMMF has been awarded "Golden Trophy" for its outstanding export performance
and contribution in dairy products sector by APEDA. In 2013-14, GCMMF took giant strides in
expanding its presence in International markets. Amuls presence on Global Dairy Trade (GDT)
platform in which only the top six dairy players of the world sell their products, has earned
respect and recognition across the world. By selling milk powders on GDT, GCMMF could not
only realize better prices as per market demand but it also firmly established Amul in the league
of top dairy players in world trade.
For its consistent adherence to quality, customer focus and dependability, GCMMF has received
numerous awards and accolades over the years. It received the Rajiv Gandhi National Quality
Award in1999 in Best of All Category. In 2002 GCMMF bagged India's Most Respected
Company Award instituted by Business World.
In 2003, it was awarded the The IMC Ramkrishna Bajaj National Quality Award - 2003 certificate of merit- for adopting noteworthy quality management practices for logistics and
procurement. GCMMF is the first and only Indian organisation to win topmost International
Dairy Federation Marketing Award for probiotic ice cream launch in 2007. For the innovations,
GCMMF has received AIMA-RK Swamy High Performance brand award 2013 and CNN-IBN
Innovating for better tomorrow award in 2014.
World Dairy Innovation Awards- 2014 for Best Marketing Campaign - "Eat Milk with Every
Meal". For the tree plantation activity GCMMF has received seven consecutive Good Green
Governance award from Srishti during 2007 to 2013.
The Amul brand is not only a product, but also a movement. It is in one way, the representation
of the economic freedom of farmers. It has given farmers the courage to dream. To hope. To live.
12
GCMMF - An Overview
Year of Establishment
1973
Members
3.37 Million
18,536
13
SALES TURNOVER
15
Sales Turnover
Rs (million)
1994-95
11140
355
1995-96
13790
400
1996-97
15540
450
1997-98
18840
455
1998-99
22192
493
1999-00
22185
493
2000-01
22588
500
2001-02
23365
500
2002-03
27457
575
2003-04
28941
616
2004-05
29225
672
2005-06
37736
850
2006-07
42778
1050
2007-08
52554
1325
2008-09
67113
1504
2009-10
80053
1700
2010-11
97742
2172
2011-12
116680
2500
2012-13
137350
2540
2013-14
181434
3024
2014-15
207330
3410
16
Establishment of a direct linkage between milk producers and consumers by eliminating middlemen
Professional management
The Amul Model of dairy development is a three-tiered structure with the dairy cooperative
societies at the village level federated under a milk union at the district level and a
federation of member unions at the state level.
17
The Amul model has helped India to emerge as the largest milk producer in the world. More than
15 million milk producers pour their milk in 1,44,500 dairy cooperative societies across the
country. Their milk is processed in 184 District Co-operative Unions and marketed by 22 State
Marketing Federations, ensuring a better life for millions.
18
AWARDS
Resourcefulness
Rajiv Gandhi National Quality Award - 1999
Mascot:
19
Breadspreads:
20
Amul Butter
Cheese Range:
Amul Amrakhand
Avsar Ladoos
Pure Ghee:
Milk Powders:
Fresh Milk:
Curd Products:
Amul Lassee
Amul Icecreams:
Royal Treat Range
Nut-o-Mania Range
Nature's Treat
Alphanso Mango, Fresh Litchi, Shahi Anjir, Fresh Strawberry, Black Currant, Santra
Mantra, Fresh Pineapple
Sundae Range
Assorted Treat
Utterly Delicious
23
Brown Beverage:
Milk Drink:
Amul Kool Flavoured Milk (Mango, Strawberry, Saffron, Cardamom, Rose, Chocolate)
Health Beverage:
Amul Shakti White Milk Food
24
PRODUCT SHOWCASE:
Amul Gold
Product Details
Product Name
Amul Gold
Description
Pasteurised milk Amul milk meets the PFA standards for the
respective type of milk.
Packing
Amul Taaza
Product Name
Amul Taaza
Description
Pasteurised Milk Amul milk meets the PFA standards for the
respective type of milk.
Packing
25
Product Details
Product Details
Product Name
Description
Pasteurised Milk Amul milk meets the PFA standards for the
respective type of milk.
Packing
26
STRENGTH:-
Mother dairy
parag
madhusudhan
gopalji
27
While world milk production declined by 2 per cent in the last three years, according to FAO
estimates, Indian production has increased by 4 per cent. The milk production in India accounts
for more than 13% of the total world output and 57% of total Asia's production. The top five
milk producing nations in the world are India ,USA, Russia, Germany and France.
Although milk production has grown at a fast pace during the last three decades (courtesy:
Operation Flood), milk yield per animal is very low. The main reasons for the low yield are
Milk Yield
(Kgs per year)
USA
7002
UK
5417
Canada
5348
New Zealand
2976
Pakistan
1052
India
795
World (Average)
2021
Source: Export prospects for agro-based industries, World Trade Centre, Mumbai.
Production in million
29
MT
1988-89
48.4
1989-90
51.4
1990-91
53.7
1991-92
56.3
1992-93
58.6
1993-94
61.2
1994-95
63.5
1995-96
65
1996-97
68.5
1997-98
70.8
1998-99
74.7
1999-00(E)
78.1
2000-01(T)
81.0
E= estimated
T= target / expected
Source: DFPI, Annual Report-1999-2000
World's major milk producers
(Million MTs)
Country
1997-98
1998-99
( Approx.)
India
71
74.5
USA
71
71
30
Russia
34
33
Germany
27
27
France
24
24
Pakistan
21
22
Brazil
21
27
UK
14
14
Ukraine
15
14
Poland
12
12
New
Zealand
11
12
Netherlands 11
11
Italy
10
10
Australia
10
Operation Flood
The transition of the Indian milk industry from a situation of net import to that of surplus has
been led by the efforts of National Dairy Development Board's Operation Flood. programme
under the aegis of the former Chairman of the board Dr. Kurien.
Launched in 1970, Operation Flood has led to the modernization of India's dairy sector and
created a strong network for procurement processing and distribution of milk by the co-operative
sector. Per capita availability of milk has increased from 132 gm per day in 1950 to over 220 gm
per day in 1998. The main thrust of Operation Flood was to organize dairy cooperatives in the
milkshed areas of the village, and to link them to the four Metro cities, which are the main
markets for milk. The efforts undertaken by NDDB have not only led to enhanced production,
improvement in methods of processing and development of a strong marketing network, but have
31
also led to the emergence of dairying as an important source of employment and income
generation in the rural areas. It has also led to an improvement in yields, longer lactation periods,
shorter calving intervals, etc through the use of modern breeding techniques. Establishment of
milk collection centers, and chilling centers has enhanced life of raw milk and enabled
minimization of wastage due to spoilage of milk. Operation Flood has been one of the world's
largest dairy development programme and looking at the success achieved in India by adopting
the co-operative route, a few other countries have also replicated the model of India's White
Revolution.
Per Capita availability of milk
Year
gm/day
1950
132
1960
127
1968
113
1973
111
1980*
128
1990
178
1992
192
1996
198
1997
200
1998
202
1999
203
2000
212
2001E
225
2002P
250
E= Estimated
P= Provisional
32
ones are ghee, butter, cheese, ice creams, milk powders, malted milk food, condensed milk
infants foods etc. Of these ghee alone accounts for 85%.
It is estimated that around 20% of the total milk produced in the country is consumed at
producer-household level and remaining is marketed through various cooperatives, private
dairies and vendors. Also of the total produce more than 50% is procured by cooperatives and
other private dairies.
While for cooperatives of the total milk procured 60% is consumed in fluid form and rest is used
for manufacturing processed value added dairy products; for private dairies only 45% is
marketed in fluid form and rest is processed into value added dairy products like ghee, makhan
etc.
Still, several consumers in urban areas prefer to buy loose milk from vendors due to the strong
perception that loose milk is fresh. Also, the current level of processing and packaging capacity
limits the availability of packaged milk.
The preferred dairy animal in India is buffalo unlike the majority of the world market, which is
dominated by cow milk. As high as 98% of milk is produced in rural India, which caters to 72%
of the total population, whereas the urban sector with 28% population consumes 56% of total
milk produced. Even in urban India, as high as 83% of the consumed milk comes from the
unorganized traditional sector.
Presently only 12% of the milk market is represented by packaged and branded pasteurized milk,
valued at about Rs. 8,000 crores. Quality of milk sold by unorganized sector however is
inconsistent and so is the price across the season in local areas. Also these vendors add water and
caustic soda, which makes the milk unhygienic.
India's dairy market is multi-layered. It's shaped like a pyramid with the base made up of a vast
market for low-cost milk. The bulk of the demand for milk is among the poor in urban areas
whose individual requirement is small, maybe a glassful for use as whitener for their tea and
coffee. Nevertheless, it adds up to a sizable volume - millions of litres per day. In the major cities
lies an immense growth potential for the modern sector. Presently, barely 778 out of 3,700 cities
and towns are served by its milk distribution network, dispensing hygienically packed
wholesome, quality pasteurized milk. According to one estimate, the packed milk segment would
double in the next five years, giving both strength and volume to the modern sector. The narrow
tip at the top is a small but affluent market for western type milk products.
Growing Volumes
The effective milk market is largely confined to urban areas, inhabited by over 25 per cent of the
country's population. An estimated 50 per cent of the total milk produced is consumed here. By
the end of the twentieth century, the urban population is expected to increase by more than 100
34
million to touch 364 million in 2000 a growth of about 40 per cent. The expected rise in urban
population would be a boon to Indian dairying. Presently, the organized sector both cooperative
and private and the traditional sector cater to this market.
The consumer access has become easier with the information revolution. The number of
households with TV has increased from 23 million in 1989 to 45 million in 1995. About 34 per
cent of these households in urban India have access to satellite television channel.
35
36
Literature review
In this paper we describe a case study of a dairy cooperative, AMUL, in western India that has
developed a successful model for doing business in large emerging economy. It has been
primarily responsible, through its innovative practices, for India to become worlds largest
producer of milk. This paper draws various lessons from the experiences of AMUL that would be
useful to cooperatives globally as well as firms that are interested in doing business in large
emerging markets like India and China.
Many of these economies have underdeveloped markets and fragmented supply bases. Market
failures for many of these small producers are high. On the other hand, the size of both, markets
and the suppliers is large. As a result, firms that identify appropriate business strategies that take
into account these characteristics are more likely to succeed in these markets. The following are
some key message from AMULs success: firms in these environments need to simultaneously
develop markets and suppliers to synchronize demand and supply planning, develop or become a
part of network of producers (i.e., cooperatives in this case) to obtain scale economies, focus on
operational effectiveness to achieve cost leadership to enable low price strategy. In addition, a
central focus to bring the diverse element together and a long-term approach are required.
37
AMULs journey towards excellence is marked by some critical understanding of the business
environment in large emerging economies like India where markets have to be developed by
combining efficiency related initiatives with increasing the base of marginal suppliers and
consumers. The essence of AMULs efforts were as follows:
It realized that in order to achieve their objectives, it had to benefit a large number of
people both suppliers and consumers. While large scale had the danger of failure due to
poor control and required more resources, it also had the advantage of creating a
momentum that would be necessary to bring more people into the fold and thereby help
more suppliers and consumers.
It also realized that its goal could only be achieved in the long run and this required
developing values in people and processes that were robust, replicable and transparent.
It also realized that the cooperative would not be independent and viable in the face of
competition if it were not financially sound. This implied that AMUL had to develop distinct
capabilities that would deliver competitive advantage to its operations.
38
Leadership
While Kaira Union (or AMUL) had the support of national leaders who were at the forefront of
the Indian independence movement, its local leaders were trained in Gandhian simplicity17 and
had their feet rooted firmly amongst people whom they had mobilized the poor farmers of
Anand. The foremost amongst them was Tribhuvandas Patel18 who had led the movement for the
formation of cooperatives of small and marginal farmers in order to compete against investor
owned enterprises on one hand, and keep bureaucracy away on the other hand. Tribhuvandas was
the first Chairman of the cooperative. His skills lay in organizing the village producers, in
making them believe in the power of cooperation and their rights towards improvement of
human condition. He is remembered as fair and honest person whose highest sense of
accountability to the members of the union laid the foundation of trust between network
members19. Another important aspect of his remarkable management style was his gentleness and
ability to repose trust in people he gave complete autonomy to managers of the union and
earned complete commitment from them20. Verghese Kurien21 was one such manager who would,
first, shape the destiny of the Union and then the milk movement throughout the country.
Kurien emerged as the father of the dairy movement in India. He managed to keep the
government and bureaucrats away from the cooperative22 and gave shape to the modern structure
of the cooperative, worked tirelessly to establish the values of modern economics, technology
and concern for farmers within the cooperative. He interfaced with global financing agencies to
build new projects at AMUL. He worked with the Unions to bring the best of technology to the
plants. He worked with marginal village farmers to create systems that would increase milk
yields. He understood that without meeting the needs of customers he would not be able to
satisfy his obligations to the farmers. In short, Kurien shaped the destiny of the milk movement
in India through NDDB (as its Chairman) and particularly at GCMMF and cooperatives in
Gujarat. He helped build a modern organization with professional management systems that
would support the aspirations of farmers and customers.
39
Several young people left better paying jobs to help create a dream of making India the milk
capital of the world. Kurien had learnt the persuasive charm of Tribhuvandas through plain
speaking and had soon created a cadre of highly capable managers to whom he had delegated
both management as well as commitment. These leaders were created at the village, district and
state levels in different organizations of the network.
He was charismatic in his communication and committed in his effort. Over a period of time, he
developed a very close link with the poor farmers who, as he always says, were his employers
at the cooperative. He would travel through the villages along with Tribhuvandas and work out
the details of how the milk collection cooperative would work, how trucks would pickup milk
from village societies, how the cattle would have to be taken care of and how all of this would
help the poor milk farmer come out of poverty and the clutches of the middleman. Operational
details were meticulously planned and executed. And then, he along with two of his close
associates would work on the design of the dairy plant including conducting experiments to
create powder out of buffalo milk a task that was ridiculed by all who heard of it including the
international aid agencies in the dairy industry. Tribhuvandas and Kurien were able to convince
the government also of the value of his efforts and secured funding for several projects of the
cooperative. He was slowly laying the foundation of a modern dairy industry in India.
Membership of the cooperative started to increase, professional managers started to join AMUL
and production capacity at AMUL started to expand (and this expansion was done through
innovative changes to processes at the plant and through equipment designed and fabricated inhouse). Kurien had transformed AMUL from a dream into a major industrial entity a network
of plants, cooperative societies, research centers, an institute for training future managers in rural
management, secondary services like veterinary/artificial insemination expertise/feed factory etc.
Kuriens biggest strength lay in his ability to convince people that the cause of rural farmers was
important thus establishing an important shared value. Subsequently, he could convince the
government to replicate the AMUL model in almost all states of the country.
40
Strategy
AMULs business strategy is driven by its twin objectives of (i) long-term, sustainable growth to
its member farmers, and (ii) value proposition to a large customer base by providing milk and
other dairy products a low price. Its strategy, which evolved over time, comprises of elements
described below.
Simultaneous Development of Suppliers and Customers: From the very early stages of the
formation of AMUL, the cooperative realized that sustained growth for the long-term was
contingent on matching supply and demand. Further, given the primitive state of the market and
the suppliers of milk, their development in a synchronous manner was critical for the continued
growth of the industry. The organization also recognized that in view of the poor infrastructure in
India, such development could not be left to market forces and proactive interventions were
required. Accordingly, AMUL and GCMMF adopted a number of strategies to assure such
growth. For example, at the time AMUL was formed, the vast majority of consumers had limited
purchasing power and was value conscious with very low levels of consumption of milk and
other dairy products. Thus, AMUL adopted a low price strategy to make their products affordable
and guarantee value to the consumer. The success of this strategy is well recognized and remains
the main plank of AMUL's strategy even today. The choice of product mix and the sequence in
which AMUL introduced its products is consistent with this philosophy. Beginning with liquid
milk, the product mix was enhanced slowly by progressive addition of higher value products
while maintaining desired growth in existing products. Even today, while competing in the
market for high value dairy products, GCMMF ensures that adequate supplies of low value
products are maintained.
On the supply side, as mentioned earlier, the member-suppliers were typically small and
marginal- farmers had severe liquidity problems, were illiterate and had no prior training in dairy
farming. AMUL and other cooperative Unions adopted a number of strategies to develop the
supply of milk and assure steady growth. First, for the short term, the procurement prices were
set so as to provide fair and reasonable return. Second, aware of the liquidity problems, cash
payments for milk supply was made with minimum of delay. For the long-term, the Unions
followed a multi-pronged strategy of education and support. For example, only part of the
surplus generated by the Unions is paid to the members in the form of dividends. A substantial
41
part of this surplus is used for activities that promote growth of milk supply and improve yields.
These include provision of veterinary services, support for cold storage facilities at the village
societies etc. In parallel, the Unions have put in place a number of initiatives to help educate the
members.
To summarize, the dual strategy of simultaneous development of the market and member farmers
has resulted in parallel growth of demand and supply at a steady pace and in turn assured the
growth of the industry over an extended period of time.
Cost Leadership: AMULs objective of providing a value proposition to a large customer base
led naturally to a choice of cost leadership position. Given the low purchasing power of the
Indian consumer and the marginal discretionary spending power, the only viable option for
AMUL was to price its products as low as possible. This in turn led to a focus on costs and had
significant implications for managing its operations and supply chain practices (described later).
Focus on Core Activities: In view of its small beginnings and limited resources, it became clear
fairly early that AMUL would not be in a position to be an integrated player from milk
production to delivery to the consumer23. Accordingly, it chose a strategy to focus on core dairy
activities and rely on third parties for other complementary needs. This philosophy is reflected in
almost all phases of AMUL network spanning R&D, production, collection, processing,
marketing, distribution, retailing etc. For example, AMUL focused on processing of liquid milk
and conversion to variety of dairy products and associated research and development. On the
other hand, logistics of milk collection and distribution of products to customers was managed
through third parties.
However, it played a proactive role in making support services available to its members
wherever it found that markets for such services were not developed. For example, in the initial
stages, its small and marginal member farmers did not have access to finance, veterinary service,
knowledge of basic animal husbandry etc. Thus to assure continued growth in milk production
and supply, AMUL actively sought and worked with partners to provide these required services.
In cases where such partnerships could not be established, AMUL developed the necessary
capabilities and provided the services. These aspects are elaborated later in this section.
42
These include logistics of milk collection, distribution of dairy products, sale of products through
dealers and retail stores, some veterinary services etc. It is worth noting that a number of these
third parties are not in the organized sector, and many are not professionally managed. Hence,
while third parties perform the activities, the Unions and GCMMF have developed a number of
mechanisms to retain control and assure quality and timely deliveries (see the sub-section on
Coordination for Competitiveness later in the paper for more details). This is particularly critical
for a perishable product such as liquid milk.
Financial Strategy: AMULs finance strategy is driven primarily by its desire to be self-reliant
and thus depend on internally generated resources for funding its growth and development. This
choice was motivated by the relatively underdeveloped financial markets with limited access to
funds, and the reluctance to depend on Government support and thus be obliged to cede control
to bureaucracy. AMULs financial strategy may thus be characterized by two elements: (a)
retention of surplus to fund growth and development, and (b) limited/ no credit, i.e., all
transactions are essentially cash only. For example, payment for milk procured by village
societies is in cash and within 12 hours of procurement (most, however, pay at the same time as
the receipt of milk). Similarly, no dispatches of finished products are made without advance
payment from distributors etc. This was particularly important, given the limited liquidity
position of farmer/suppliers and the absence of banking facilities in rural India. This strategy
strongly helped AMUL implement its own vision of growth and development. It is important to
mention that many of the above approaches were at variance with industry practices of both
domestic and MNC competitors of AMUL.
43
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
b Sample Design
i Sample Unit : People who buy milk available in retail outlets, superstores
etc.
ii Sample Size : 50
iii Sampling Technique : convenience sampling
iv Sampling Area : Ghaziabad.
c
Data Collection
primary data through questionnaire
Secondary data though internet,books,newspaper
and journal.
d Data Analysis
Statistical Tools/Techniques: cross tabulation , one sampe t-test and
oneway annova.
44
ANALYSIS
Frequencies
1.GENDER
GENDER
N
Valid
Missing
Valid
50
GENDER
0
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
MALE
18
36.0
36.0
36.0
FEMALE
32
64.0
64.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
2 SATISFACTION
45
Valid
50
Missing
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
YES
35
70.0
70.0
70.0
NO
15
30.0
30.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Statistics
what you like
N
Valid
Missing
50
0
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
QUALITY
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
TASTE
15
30.0
30.0
70.0
PRICE
10
20.0
20.0
90.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
AVAILABILITY
Total
Statistics
consumption per day
N
Valid
50
Missing
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
1 Ltr
35
70.0
70.0
70.0
2-4 ltr
10
20.0
20.0
90.0
>4 ltr
10.0
10.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
5. BRAND PREFERENCE
48
Statistics
brand prefrnc
N
Valid
Missing
50
0
brand prefrnc
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
amul
30
60.0
60.0
60.0
mother dairy
10
20.0
20.0
80.0
parag
12.0
12.0
92.0
others
8.0
8.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
Total
49
Statistics
from how long you are consuming amul
N
Valid
Missing
50
0
unapplicable
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
6 mnths
4.0
4.0
44.0
1 yr
10.0
10.0
54.0
2-4 yr
10
20.0
20.0
74.0
>4 yr
13
26.0
26.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
50
Valid
Missing
50
0
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
unapplicable
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
gold
17
34.0
34.0
74.0
taaza
12.0
12.0
86.0
14.0
14.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
Total
Statistics
oinion on price
N
Valid
opinion on taste
opinion on availability
50
50
50
Missing
oinion on price
Frequency
Valid
unapplicable
excellent
good
average
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
6.0
6.0
46.0
23
46.0
46.0
92.0
8.0
8.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
opinion on taste
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
unapplicable
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
excellent
17
34.0
34.0
74.0
good
10
20.0
20.0
94.0
6.0
6.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
average
Total
opinion on availability
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
unapplicable
20
40.0
40.0
40.0
excellent
20
40.0
40.0
80.0
good
16.0
16.0
96.0
average
4.0
4.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
Total
52
53
54
CROSSTAB
1. Relationship between gender & the factor they like.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Missing
Percent
50
Total
Percent
100.0%
.0%
Percent
50
MALE
FEMALE
Total
TASTE
Total
PRICE
AVAILABILITY
18
18
15
10
32
20
15
10
50
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
df
42.188a
.000
Likelihood Ratio
52.339
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
27.562
.000
N of Valid Cases
50
a. 3 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.80.
55
100.0%
INTERPRETATION
H: no relation exist between gender & factor of liking
H1 : relationship exist between gender & factor of liking.
Chi-square value is 42.188 with d.f =3
p-value = .00 which is less than so reject H
There is a relationship between gender & factor of liking.
56
Missing
Percent
50
100.0%
Total
Percent
.0%
Percent
50
100.0%
mother dairy
Total
parag
others
YES
22
10
35
NO
15
30
10
50
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
df
14.921a
.002
17.974
.000
6.056
.014
50
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.20.
57
INTERPRETATION
H: no relation exist between satisfaction & brand preference.
H1 : relationship exist between satisfaction & brand preference.
Chi-square value is 14.921 with d.f =3
p-value = .02 which is less than so reject H
There is a relationship between satisfaction & brand preference.
58
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
100.0%
.0%
50
100.0%
amul milk
gold
taaza
YES
13
12
35
NO
15
20
17
50
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
.756a
.860
Likelihood Ratio
.809
.847
Linear-by-Linear Association
.346
.557
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
Total
50
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.80.
59
INTERPRETATION
H: no relation exist between satisfaction & variant of amul.
H1 : relationship exist between satisfaction & variant of amul.
Chi-square value is .756 with d.f =3
p-value = .860 which is greater than so accept H
There is no relationship between satisfaction & variant of amul.
60
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
100.0%
.0%
50
100.0%
on taste
unapplicable
excellent
Total
20
gold
12
17
taaza
20
17
10
50
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
75.082a
.000
Likelihood Ratio
83.925
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
22.293
.000
N of Valid Cases
average
20
Total
Pearson Chi-Square
good
50
a. 12 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .36.
61
INTERPRETATION
H: no relation exist between opinion on taste & variant of amul.
H1 : relationship exist between opinion on taste & variant of amul.
Chi-square value is 75.082 with d.f =9
p-value = .000 which is less than so reject H
There is a relationship between opinion on taste & variant of amul.
62
Missing
Percent
50
Total
Percent
100.0%
Percent
.0%
50
100.0%
TASTE
Total
PRICE
AVAILABILITY
amul
10
15
30
mother dairy
10
10
parag
others
20
15
10
50
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
56.250a
.000
Likelihood Ratio
55.164
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
15.239
.000
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
50
a. 13 cells (81.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .40.
63
INTERPRETATION
H: no relation exist between brand preference & factor of liking.
H1 : relationship exist between brand preference & factor of liking
Chi-square value is 56.250 with d.f =9
p-value = .000 which is less than so reject H
There is a relationship between brand preference & factor of liking.
64
T- TEST
Mean
50
Std. Deviation
1.0400
1.12413
.15898
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 3
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
t
oinion on price
-12.329
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.000
Mean Difference
-1.96000
H : = 3
H1: 3
T-cal= -12.329
Df= 49
p-value = .000 which is less than so reject hypothesis.
65
Lower
Upper
-2.2795
-1.6405
ONE-WAY ANNOVA
Descriptives
AGE
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Minimum
Maximum
amul
30
32.4667
10.43447
1.90506
28.5704
36.3630
18.00
55.00
mother dairy
10
32.2000
9.00370
2.84722
25.7591
38.6409
18.00
44.00
parag
34.3333
12.43651
5.07718
21.2820
47.3846
22.00
52.00
others
42.0000
15.76917
7.88458
16.9077
67.0923
19.00
54.00
50
33.4000
10.83080
1.53171
30.3219
36.4781
18.00
55.00
Total
ANOVA
AGE
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
df
Mean Square
341.600
113.867
Within Groups
5406.400
46
117.530
Total
5748.000
49
Sig.
.969
INTERPRETATION
H : No difference in the mean age among different brands of milk.
H1: difference in the mean age among different brands of milk.
P value = 0.416 which is greater than so accept H.
Thus there is no difference in the mean age among different brands of milk.
66
.416
FINDINGS
1. It is findings in the survey that females are the main decision maker for the milk. As per the data,
64% of female and 36% of male makes purchase decision.
2. The main purchasing factors for the Amul Milk are Quality and taste. The data reveals that 40%
influences on Quality and 30% influenced for the taste.
3. Out of 60 % amul consumers 46 % are buying since more than 2 years & 10% since one year.
4. 70% buy 1 litre per day 20% buy 2-4 litre & 10% buy more than 4 litre.
5. 60% buy amul milk, 20% buy mother dairy, 12% parag & 8% other.
6. Out of 60% amul consumers 34% buy amul gold, 12% amul taaza & 14% slim and trim.
7. Out of total respondent 70% are satisfied and 30 % are unsatisfied.
8. Out of 60% amul consumers 34% says taste is excellent, 10% says good & 6% average.
9. Out of 60% amul consumers 6% says price is excellent, 46% says good & 8% average.
10. Out of 60% amul consumers 40% says availability is excellent, 16% says good & 4% average.
SUGGESTIONS:
67
1. Milk purchasing decisions are more decided by women rather than male, because she act as a
invigilator, execute her decision and influence the same to the purchase while ascertaining the
quality, freshness and price. Hence, I suggest GCMMF to concentrate more on the women and
men suggestions for designing the marketing strategy, because womens role in the house is
dominant, even in the various decisions.
2. Since Amul is having loyal customers and therefore should concentrate more on this factor
through various potential programmes such as campaign, premium packs, offers etc., this helps
to increase the loyalty towards the Amul products.
3. Milk is having high demand and it is considered as a very essential products. In present practice,
purchase of milk is through dealers. In this connection dealers approach towards the product.
4. Customer is influential, hence I suggest Amul to look after the dealers issue with due care.
5. When product possesses quality and other important attributes naturally they propaganda about
product through word of mouth and vice versa. Therefore if the quality and attributes are fine
tuned according to the needs will help the Amul to get reputation and addition market.
6. Introduction of various economic products lies may help Amul to attract the existing and new
customers and may attract all income level groups. Hence I suggest management to introduce
new product line which can satisfy the entire group.
CONCLUSION:-
68
From the survey conducted it is observed that Amul milk has a good market share.
From the study conducted the following conclusions can be drawn. In order the dreams comes
into reality and for turning liabilities into assets one must have to meet the needs of the
customers.
The factors considered by the customer before purchasing milk are freshness, taste, thickness and
availability.
Finally I conclude that, majority of the customers are satisfied with the Amul milk and Milk
products because of its good quality, reputation, easy availabilities. Some customers are not
satisfied with the Amul Milk because of high price, lack of dealer services, spoilage and low
shelf life etc. therefore, if slight modification in the marketing programme such as dealers and
outlets, promotion programmers, product lines etc., definitely company can be as a monopoly
and strong market leader.
Amul has also to take care of its competitors into consideration and more importantly its
customers before making any move.
REFERENCES
69
BOOKS.
INTERNET.
www.Amul.com
www.google.com
www.indiatimes.com
www. Wikipedia.com
70
QUESTIONNAIRE
I, Adil Khan, student of PGDM of IMS Ghaziabad, is doing a Project on CONSUMER
BUYING PATTERN TOWARDS AMUL MILK .So I request you to provide the required
information for the completion of my Project Report. Any information received will be kept
confidential.
71
Name
: - ______________________________________________
Age
: - _________________
Gender
: - _________________
b) Taste
d) Availability
c) 2-4 yr
d) >4 yr
EXCELLENT
GOOD
73
AVERAGE
BAD
V.BAD