Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Inspection Report
Page 1 of 21
19 22 October 2015
13 16 January 2014
General Information
Students
School ID
169
Total number of
students
1,206
Opening year of
school
1975
Number of children
in KG
120
Principal
Idrees Hussain
Number of students
in other phases
School telephone
Age range
School Address
Al Manaseer Education
Zone, Al Ain
Primary 436
Middle
394
High
256
3 years 8 months to 18
years 8 months
Grades or Year
Groups
KG to Grade 12
pakistaniislamic.pvt@adec.
ac.ae
Gender
Mix
School Website
N/A
% of Emirati
Students
0%
Largest nationality
groups (%)
1. Pakistani
90.38%
2. Afghan
3.37%
3. Bangladeshi 0.38%
Licensed Curriculum
Main Curriculum
Pakistani
Other Curriculum
External Exams/
Standardised tests
Accreditation
FBISE, Pakistan
Staff
Number of teachers
55
Number of Teaching
Assistants (TAs)
Teacher-student
ratio
1:24 KG/ FS
1:22 Other phases
Teacher turnover
18%
Page 2 of 21
Introduction
Inspection activities
4
75
Number of parents
questionnaires
School
School Aims
Admission Policy
Leadership structure
(ownership, governance and
management)
Page 4 of 21
SEN and G&T Details (Refer to ADEC SEN Policy and Procedures)
Number of students
identified through external
assessments
Intellectual disability
Specific Learning
Disability
Emotional and Behaviour
Disorders (ED/ BD)
Autism Spectrum
Disorder (ASD)
Speech and Language
Disorders
Physical and health
related disabilities
Visually impaired
Hearing impaired
Multiple disabilities
SEN Category
Number of students
identified
Intellectual ability
63
33
14
46
Page 5 of 21
Band B
Satisfactory (Acceptable)
Band C
(C)
High Performing
Satisfactory
Acceptable
Band B
Good
Band A
Very Good
Performance Standards
BAND
Outstanding
Very Weak
Band C
In need of significant
improvement
Very Weak
Weak
Band A
Performance Standard 1:
Students achievement
Performance Standard 2:
Students personal and
social development, and
their innovation skills
Performance Standard 3:
Teaching and assessment
Performance Standard 4:
Curriculum
Performance Standard 5:
The protection, care,
guidance and support of
students
Performance Standard 6:
Leadership and
management
Summary Evaluation:
The schools overall
performance
Page 6 of 21
develop initiative. Practical, hands-on experience, group work, problem solving and
other provision to help develop innovation amongst students are highly inadequate.
the schools use of assessment to improve planning and promote better progress
clarification of senior and middle leadership roles and accountabilities, to set a clear
direction for school improvement.
Page 8 of 21
Islamic
Education
Arabic
(as a First Language)
Arabic
(as a Second
Language)
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Attainment
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Progress
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Attainment
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Progress
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Attainment
N/A
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Progress
N/A
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Attainment
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Progress
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Attainment
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Progress
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Attainment
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Progress
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Attainment
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Progress
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Attainment
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Progress
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Attainment
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Progress
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Social Studies
English
Mathematics
Science
Language of
instruction (if other
than English and
Arabic as First
Language)
Other subjects
(Art, Music, PE)
Learning Skills
(including innovation, creativity, critical
thinking, communication, problemsolving and collaboration)
Page 9 of 21
Attainment and progress are very weak overall. In the Kindergarten this results from
very weak teaching, unacceptable resources and in students working in small, dull
and unimaginatively decorated rooms. The weak position at the time of the last
inspection has been exacerbated by a recent staffing crisis which has affected the
Kindergarten particularly badly. Here, staff shortages have led to the frequent
combination of classes, which makes rooms unacceptably crowded, severely limiting
how much children can move around to develop their skills. Across all subjects, these
are well below those expected for their age. Childrens progress in all areas of
learning is very slow.
In Urdu, attainment matches or exceeds expectations throughout the school. With
the exception of Urdu, attainment for the majority of students in the primary and
middle phases is below, or well below national and international age-related
expectations. This is the case in English, mathematics, science, social studies and
Islamic education, though in some of these subjects attainment is acceptable in the
high school. It is well below average in Arabic and in social studies in these grades.
Older students examination results in some years compare favourably with the
national and international averages in mathematics, science and English. Most
students work seen during the inspection showed standards lower than these results
suggest in middle and primary.
By grade 12, the relatively few students taking examinations in the high school phase
sometimes achieve standards above average. The majority of students progress is
very weak until they reach these higher year groups. In the high school phase,
progress is most often acceptable, except in Arabic where it is weak. In most subjects,
achievement is better in the high school because classes are generally smaller,
positive relationships have developed between most teachers and students, and
students attitudes towards learning are acceptable. Elsewhere in the school,
achievement is inconsistent between groups of students. It is particularly weak where
behaviour management is unacceptable and students behave badly. Sometimes
students are compliant and well behaved, but progress is very weak because planning
does not meet the needs of different groups.
In Arabic, students very weak comprehension of the spoken language leads to them
not understanding the teachers questions. If they do, they are very often unable to
formulate acceptable answers because speaking skills are very weak. In many
instances there is little evidence of writing and progress is very slow. Extended
writing is extremely limited and few students can read to the standards expected for
their ages. In some higher grades students Islamic education lessons enable them to
gain an acceptable understanding of Islamic values.
Page 10 of 21
for their own progress, or improvement of their work, so independent learning skills
develop only poorly. A large minority of more able students waste time if they finish
a task quickly. Little extended work stretches their capabilities. Innovation skills,
creativity and problems solving are very weak because teachers do not include these
aspects in their lessons in the large majority of cases. These weaknesses lead to very
weak progress. They impact particularly adversely on more able learners, including
those who have particular skills or talents. Students who need support seldom
receive any, sometimes copying work from other students, or the teacher doing work
for them.
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Personal development
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Weak
Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Across the school, students personal and social development is weak, and some
aspects are very weak. At all stages, they lack self-reliance and independence. These
important personal skills develop very weakly in the Kindergarten because students
environment and the lack of staff in the current circumstances mean that they are not
promoted effectively. As students move through the school, relationships between
staff and students strengthen and attitudes towards learning become more positive.
By Grade 12, several students are confident enough to initiate discussions with visiting
adults. While the majority are mostly compliant and passive, students behaviour in a
minority of lessons is disruptive and unacceptable in the primary and middle phases.
This is usually because teaching and activities do not interest or motivate them. Too
many late arrivals to school mean that a minority of students miss assemblies and are
late for the first lesson. Attendance, at less than 90%, is weak.
Those who attend assemblies respond respectfully to the national anthems of both
the UAE and Pakistan and acknowledge the flag appropriately. Most listen carefully
to Islamic recitation. Very sparse displays around the school contribute to students
under-developed understanding of UAE heritage and culture. Poor displays in classes
Page 12 of 21
fail to celebrate students work from any subject effectively. The promotion of healthy
lifestyles is not supported by enough advisory posters or other information. The
school nurse is able to provide appropriate information and advice about healthy
lifestyles and personal matters, but has little opportunity to do so.
Extremely limited opportunities for students to get involved in innovative or creative
activity of any kind results in very weak development of these skills. Very little use of
new technology limits students research and investigative skills. In part, these
facilities, as with the provision of all other learning resources, are limited because of
budget constraints. Where interactive whiteboards are available, they are seldom
used, and then only by staff. Critical thinking and problem solving activities are not
included in the large majority of teachers planning, so these skills are very weak at all
levels. Students seldom have the opportunity to work together in groups, so
communication and innovation skills remain very weak until the later years. In lessons,
only a few leadership opportunities exist, though some older students do take on
prefect responsibilities, patrolling at breaks for instance.
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Assessment
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Teaching is very weak across the school. Its impact is most positive in the high school,
resulting in acceptable examination results. The majority of KG phase-specialists are
currently absent. Here, teachers have exceptionally low expectations of children.
Consequently, children do not attain well enough, or make acceptable progress. In a
Kindergarten lesson, children were unnecessarily revising two-dimensional shapes
they already knew about. In another, they were simply colouring in shapes, with many
displaying weak motor control over pencils. Such lessons in many subjects fail to
extend or deepen students learning in any way. As a result, students behaviour can
be disruptive and disrespectful. For a few students, these lessons provide
consolidation for slower learners pre-existing learning, but most do not need this.
Classrooms lack resources to provide younger learners, including those in the
Page 13 of 21
Kindergarten, with any concrete experiences of learning, and rooms are too small for
the large numbers of students.
Arabic teaching is very weak across the school. Lessons are teacher-led and textbookdirected, resulting in a lack of student engagement, interaction or collaboration. This
often results in very weak attainment and poor progress. It also leads to poor
behaviour and disruption to learning. Most students therefore demonstrate very
weak comprehension in Arabic across the school, but slightly better reading skills.
Urdu lessons often show the majority of students reading skills improving as a result
of teachers good explanation of difficult vocabulary. This leads to good progress.
Students often work in groups, and there are examples of students learning team
skills effectively, which is absent in other subjects. These active teaching approaches
lead to attainment which is in line with, or sometimes above age-related
expectations. The subject also shows a rare example within the school, of good
teacher-student interactions through questioning. On one occasion an interactive
magic box excited and engaged students and they learned well. Younger children in
the Kindergarten feel secure due to the presence of the Urdu teacher. Story-telling
and the sharing of ideas in Urdu stimulate interactions and discussions and ensure
that students make at least acceptable progress. In Urdu, teachers modelling of neat
hand writing is a rare positive example for students to emulate.
In the majority of other lessons and subjects, work is not adequately matched to
individuals or groups needs, particularly for those of higher attaining students. In
most lessons, these students often complete work set very quickly. Few
opportunities are subsequently provided to extend their learning or deepen
understanding. Teachers use of different questioning styles is typically very limited,
so students thinking is not extended. This hinders students critical reflection and
innovation skills, which are very weak across the school. As a result of weak behaviour
management, students behaviour is sometimes disruptive in lessons because they
are not engaged or challenged adequately, so they get bored.
Where students achieve acceptably, for instance in mathematics in the high school, it
is because teaching is generally properly pitched in line with international and ageappropriate expectations. In a few mathematics lessons, learning was modelled
effectively, so that students understood how to calculate and reason mathematically.
Occasionally in mathematics and elsewhere, skilful questioning challenges these
older students and checks their understanding. Most strengths in teaching lie in these
higher year groups. This is where the school uses mostly specialist subject staff. Older
students generally show positive attitudes in lessons resulting in effective behaviour
for learning. Suitably pitched work for grades 10 to 12 sometimes challenges thinking
Page 14 of 21
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Curriculum adaptation
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
The implementation and delivery of the curriculum are very weak. Curriculum choices
for older students are very limited. They are limited even in the high school phase. The
school does not review its curriculum regularly. Therefore, planning does not
incorporate recent UAE requirements to develop skills such as innovation. Likewise,
planning, implementation and adaptation to meet all students academic, personal
and social needs is very weak. The curriculum does not meet the needs of the very
few students with identified special educational needs (SEN) such as hearing and
visual impairment. Their progress, and those with other school-identified difficulties,
is very weak in all phases. Learning opportunities are insufficiently broad and varied
throughout. They do not provide the balance of experience needed to promote
acceptable learning. In science, for example, too little practical work reduces
students understanding of the links between theory and the real world.
Curriculum planning is very weak, as is teaching in the Kindergarten, partly because
of the current shortage of staff. General provision for other phases is not planned
well enough, nor adapted sufficiently well to match the learning needs of different
groups. Those students with SEN and the more able are particularly disadvantaged.
Page 15 of 21
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
Very Weak
The schools procedures for protection, care, guidance and support for students are
very weak. There are minimal formal procedures to ensure that students are
safeguarded at all times. Students and parents comment that they are unaware of
any systems. Despite some recent investment in areas such as CCTV, the school is
ineffective in protecting students from potential harm in all circumstances. The social
worker currently operates in a teaching role, so can provide only minimal support for
students. The principal has assumed responsibility for health and safety with two
other employees. This accountability is not working effectively. Managers and
trustees believe there to be no instances of staff or student infringement of codes of
conduct, such as adherence to the child protection policy. The inspection team
observed several such incidents at first hand. Additionally, others were reported.
These were notified to senior staff.
Page 16 of 21
Fire drills have taken place properly and maintenance logs are available. The nurse
and the clinic are both licensed. The clinic is suitably equipped. The school overall does
not provide a safe, hygienic and secure environment for students or staff in all areas.
Checks in areas, such as the safety of wiring and equipment, are inadequate. Many
toilet doors open directly onto busy corridors. Other doors also open outwards, at
the risk of hitting passers-by. Maintenance logs reveal that some checks are made,
but students report very recent and longstanding problems, with the air conditioning
for instance. This has only just been made to function properly. Records show that
the school has no budget to acquire new furniture and the large majority of furniture
in use is unacceptable for twenty-first century learning needs. Students also comment
critically about how inconvenient and sometimes dangerous furniture and fittings are
in some places.
The appointed social worker has had no opportunity to identify, or work with
students with learning difficulties or SEN. Teaching commitments prevent this.
Neither he nor the nurse has any opportunity to promote healthy lifestyles or good
nutrition amongst students. Systems and procedures for managing students
behaviour are inconsistently implemented amongst staff. Arrangements to promote
and improve good attendance are ineffective. No specific procedures to follow up
absence or lateness exist, so attendance is inadequate. Punctuality to classes is not
routinely recorded, so no sanctions exist. Teachers are not fully trained to notify the
school about any concerns which may indicate special needs, so identification is very
weak. The school provides little support for the externally identified students with
hearing and vision impairment. Very weak provision is available to extend the learning
for the considerable number identified as having particular gifts or talents. Guidance
is weak for grades 11 and 12 related to academic progression after they leave the
school. Guidance and advice about students personal development and academic
improvement are very weak in the rest of the school. This is very limited and
uninformative.
Page 17 of 21
Very Weak
Very Weak
Weak
Governance
Very Weak
Very Weak
Leadership and management are very weak. The school recognises that it is in a crisis
resulting from the removal of about 20 staff from the school in June, for not having
the prerequisite approvals to employment. Most of these were teachers, particularly
from the Kindergarten. The remaining 55 teachers all possess proper official papers,
but the school is inadequately staffed. This crisis accounts for many of the weaknesses
described in this report, but not all.
The very recently appointed principal designate is beginning to understand the
schools strengths and to identify areas for development. He is unable to make
decisions or plans. This is because the school Board of Trustees appointment is not
endorsed by ADEC as the schools license has expired. In the meantime, the outgoing
principal is substantive in all official affairs in the period of transition. All share the
vision and commitment as a non-profit making community school, which is strong in
the ethos of the school. The parents survey shows that most parents are satisfied
with the school. Educational leadership is currently very weak. Those responsible for
leading improvements have not succeeded in this objective. Relationships in the
school are fragile and staff morale is low. Students are often unhappy and some hold
a strong belief that senior staff take no notice of their concerns. Self-evaluation is very
weak, inaccurate and is not based on evidence. After considerable revision, the
schools development plan was completed in June, but has been superseded by the
staffing crisis and by the arrival of the principal designate. As neither is reflected in the
plan, it lacks the ability to drive improvement.
The schools capacity to improve is very limited. Finance to support investment in
infrastructure or staffing is unavailable. Accountability lines to support improvement
are unclear. The acting vice principal provides much of the educational administration,
but his workload is very heavy. Effective communication is hindered by unacceptable,
often contradictory paperwork in areas such as timetabling. Systems for the
monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning are extremely weak. They do not
Page 18 of 21
Page 19 of 21
Page 20 of 21
Page 21 of 21