March 8, 2016 I would like to welcome everyone back to the Community and Protective Services Committee. First and foremost, I want to thank all of the delegations who took the time to speak to us yesterday. We appreciate the respectful exchange of idea and your dedication to this very important issue. Over the last week, I have heard important feedback from the taxi industry. I have also heard these concerns echoed by my colleagues around the table. This is a complex issue and today we will see a number of motions come before us that aim to address some of these concerns, including: accessibility, compliance, oversight, enforcement and timing. On compliance and oversight The top issue the taxi industry raised is the difference in approach related to individual relationships and record-keeping of Private Transportation Company drivers. While this different approach is fundamental to the staff recommendations, we recognize that there can be an improvement in ensuring better oversight of Private Transportation Companies.
To help address this, Councillor Egli will be bringing forward a
motion that will ensure PTCs are required to provide up-to-date driver information to the Chief Licensing Inspector on a proactive basis. On enforcement The taxi industry also raised concerns with Ubers past behaviour with regards to abiding by City by-laws and our ability to enforce. They have recommended the City take steps to ensure the new regulations are respected. Councillor Qaqish will be bringing forward a motion to ensure that staff report back to Council on compliance and enforcement efforts for this new license category. In the same vein In order to bring PTCs in line with the current power the Chief Licensing Officer has over the traditional industry, Councillor Nussbaum has an amendment to suspend the license of a Private Transportation Company for emergencies and as a result of certain conduct, this will include the ability to prohibit the licensee from carrying out business while the license is suspended. In terms of the June 30 implementation date The taxi industry indicated that it would need more time to adjust to the changes in the proposed regulations. Understanding this, Councillor Darouze will bring forward a motion to change the implementation date to September 30, 2016. On HST requirements
Throughout this process we have stressed that these regulations
are largely focused on the areas under the control of the municipality. One of the requests the taxi industry brought forward was about the requirements for Private Transportation Company drivers to charge and remit HST. While we do not have carriage of this, Councillor Fleury is bringing forward a motion to contact the Canada Revenue Agency directly to make them aware of this new transportation category and to report back to Council with their response. In our other discussions with the taxi industry, it became apparent that Coventry Connections plan for its new eCab app may not be in line with the proposal thats on the table. For example, the app has a cancellation fee and the company would also like to expand its service offerings to have larger luxury vehicles. If we approve the by-law as-is, or even keep the same by-law, the taxi industry couldnt pursue these new business ideas. Councillor Darouze will bring forward a motion that will allow for these innovations and expansion. The issue of accessibility is an important one. We need to make sure that the transportation options of some are not a detriment to others.
We have the highest standards in Canada and although I have
said it before, I will say it again; we have no intention of sliding backwards. But we do owe it to our community to get it right. I want to thank Councillor Qadri, our Councils liaison with the Accessibility Advisory Committee, for his leadership on this issue. He will be bringing forward a motion to ensure that we make the most of this new opportunity, while protecting the progress weve made to date. Let me remind you of some of those: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
7. 8.
Allow taxi companies to offer reduced fares when rides are
booked through an app Eliminate the $1.50 credit and debit card fee Reducing the taxi driver license fee by 40% (from $170 to $96) Waiving the taxi driver license fee for accessible taxis (from $170 to $0) Eliminate interior and trunk size requirements for vehicles Eliminate the $820 standard taxicab Algonquin College course for drivers, while retaining the ability for taxi companies to run their own industry-appropriate training if they wish Retain exclusive use of taxi stands and lanes Retain exclusive Para Transpo contract, worth about $9million annually
I believe the staff report is fair and moves our city in the right direction.
This report will allow our vehicle-for-hire industry to modernize,
innovate and compete. This report will also introduce standards for public safety and consumer protection while protecting accessibility for all vehiclefor-hire classes. Thats what we will do. But heres what we wont do. We will not and cannot use regulation to keep a new entrant out of the marketplace. It is not our role as regulators to involve ourselves in the specifics. And we should not use the blunt instrument of regulation. It is clear that the taxi industry needs to change. Change is never easy. The industry needs fewer regulations and more competition. For all other motions that will be brought forward, I want my colleagues to think critically and consider the implications. If we approach the future with old ideas, we will not be an innovative city. We cannot say that we support PTCs, then turn around and slap unneeded rules on them that are based on failed approaches. I look forward to the discussion.