Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I. NOMENCLATURE
TC
t
TC
L
k
C
k
_
F
=the capacity of facility k.
k
F
=Total active power flow between buses l and k
lk
0
= Power flow on a line between buses l and k from
F
lk
previous taxation
i
u
g
D
ij, k
C
ij
g
w
ij
II. INTRODUCTION
TC =TC
t
kK
C L MW
k k
t, k
t T k K
C L MW
k k
t, k
(1)
Fk ,k
C
kK
k
tT
(2)
Ft , k
Ck
kK
Fk ,k
tT
(3)
C
=
l k, j
F0 +
lk
D
G
l k, i i
(4a)
D
=D
+A
l k, i l k, r
(4b)
i =1
IV.
F. Counter-Flow Method
This method suggests that if a particular transaction flows
in the opposite direction of the net flow, then the transaction
should be credited the transaction would pay a negative
charge.
A
jL
ik j
i =1
N
L
j
j =1
(5)
E. MVA-Mile Method
The MVA-mile method is an extended version of the MWmile method [13]. The extension is proposed to include
charges for the reactive power flow in addition to charges for
real power flow.
F
=
lk
G
A
i k i
i = 1
i r
D
= F
i
k
l k,r
N
i
i = 1
fa
f1
fb
f2
f1 = f1
fb
fa
+ f1
f a + fb
f a + fb
fb
fa
IF
f2 = f2
+ f2
f a + fb
f a + fb
(6)
(4c)
P =
Gk
k =1
g
D
P
ij, k Gk
(7)
Where,
g
g
p = p
ij
i
g
D
=
ij, k
[Au ]ij
j u
i
g
p + P ; i = 1, 2,..., n
ij
Gi
[ ]
[ ]
g
p A 1
p A 1
ij u ik
ij u ik
g
p
p
i
i
1, i = j
p ji
, j iu
=
pj
0, otherwise
(8)
(9)
(10)
gk
i = 1 j d
i
g g
w D P =
ij ij Gk
A 1
u
Cij (11)
i = 1 p g j d
i
i
n
Line
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ij
1-2
1-5
2-3
2-4
2-5
3-4
4-5
4-7
4-9
5-6
6-11
6-12
6-13
7-8
7-9
9-10
9-14
10-11
12-13
13-14
Series Z (pu)
X
0.019
0.054
0.047
0.058
0.057
0.067
0.013
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.095
0.123
0.066
0.000
0.000
0.032
0.171
0.082
0.221
0.171
0.059
0.223
0.198
0.763
0.174
0.171
0.042
0.209
0.556
0.252
0.199
0.256
0.130
0.176
0.110
0.084
0.270
0.192
0.200
0.348
Shunt
Y/2
0.026
0.025
0.022
0.019
0.017
0.017
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Line
Cost ($)
CKLK
200
210
290
400
200
180
185
60
60
59
52
120
121
0
40
50
80
50
85
100
S ta r t
In p u t L in e a n d B u s
D a ta
S o lv e lo a d F lo w p r o b le m
A re th e re
lo s s e s ?
Y es
No
A llo c a te e a c h lin e
lo s s a s a d d itio n a l
lo a d s o n b o th
e n d s o f lin e
C o m p u te u p s tr e a m
d is tr ib u tio n m a trix ( A u )
In p u t G e n e r a tio n
V e c to r
C o m p u te in v e r s e o f A u & P g e n
C o m p u te c o s t fo r
tra n s m is s io n lin e t ( T C t)
C o m p u te T a riff
End
V.
Tables 1 and 2 are the respective line and bus data for IEEE
14 bus system which is used to test the algorithm. The results
are presented in tables 3 - 5. There are two generators G1 and
G2 with generations 248.78MW and 40MW respectively
evaluated from load flow analysis of the test system. Bus 1
Bus
Generation
No. P
Q
P
(MW) (MVar) (MW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
40.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
21.700
94.200
47.800
7.600
11.200
11.200
0.000
29.500
9.000
3.500
6.100
13.500
14.900
Load
Q
(MVa
r)
0.000
12.700
19.000
-3.900
1.600
7.500
0.000
0.000
16.600
5.800
1.800
1.600
5.800
5.000
Bus
Bus
Voltage Angle
(Volt) (deg)
1.060
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
4
i-j
1-2
Power Flow
P (M W)
137.54
Q
(M Var)
-534.93
1-5
66.35
-509.97
2-3
65.11
-405.97
2-4
48.66
-348.56
2-5
35.06
-318.73
2-4
-19.50
-344.35
1-5
66.35
57.20
9.15
210
12012.00 1921.50
4-5
-56.56
-139.79
2-3
65.11
45.73
19.38
290
13261.70 5620.20
4-7
36.37
22.07
2-4
48.66
34.60
14.06
400
13840.00 5624.00
4-9
18.55
12.45
2-5
35.06
28.05
7.01
200
5610.00
10
5-6
40.82
28.37
3-4
19.50
15.60
3.90
180
2808.00
702.00
4-5
56.56
39.59
16.97
185
7324.15
3139.45
11
6-11
05.10
03.09
4-7
36.37
30.91
5.46
60
1854.60
327.60
12
6-12
05.43
02.52
4-9
18.55
15.77
2.78
60
946.20
166.80
13
6-13
11.50
07.21
10
5-6
44.82
40.34
4.48
59
2380.06
264.32
14
7-8
00.00
00.00
11
6-11
5.10
4.08
1.02
52
265.20
53.04
15
7-9
25.17
17.65
12
6-12
5.43
3.80
1.63
120
456.00
195.60
16
9-10
2.72
4.79
13
6-13
11.50
8.50
3.45
121
1028.50
417.45
14
7-8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17
9-14
6.09
4.11
15
7-9
25.17
15.10
10.07
40
604.00
402.80
18
10-11
-03.09
-01.07
16
9-10
2.72
2.44
0.28
50
122.00
14.00
19
12-13
00.40
0.69
17
9-14
6.09
3.65
2.44
80
292.00
195.20
20
13-14
04.17
01.95
18
10-11
3.09
2.38
0.71
50
119.00
35.50
19
12-13
0.40
0.24
0.16
85
20.40
13.60
20
13-14
100
37.50
42.00
Line
No i - j
.
1
1-2
Generation
CL
137.5
118.49
19.05
200
ij
Load
Q(MVar)
Bus
Voltage
(Volt)
Bus
Angle
(deg)
P(MW)
Q(MVar)
P(MW)
248.778
95.949
0.000
0.000
1.060
0.000
2
3
4
40.000
0.000
0.000
44.749
0.000
0.000
21.700
94.200
47.800
12.700
19.000
-3.900
1.000
0.910
0.924
-4.810
-13.265
-10.620
0.000
0.000
7.600
1.600
0.939
-8.882
0.000
0.000
11.200
7.500
0.872
-16.809
0.000
0.000
11.200
0.000
0.878
-15.998
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.878
-15.998
0.000
0.000
29.500
16.600
0.856
-18.108
10
0.000
0.000
9.000
5.800
0.850
-18.315
11
0.000
0.000
3.500
1.800
0.586
17.762
12
0.000
0.000
6.100
1.600
0.853
-18.120
13
0.000
0.000
13.500
5.800
0.848
-18.260
14
0.000
0.000
14.900
5.000
0.830
-19.717
288.778
140.698
270.200
G1
CL
MW ,
k
ij
4.17
3.75
0.42
592.1
470.22
121.97
Total
G2
P
1 k
G2
CL
MW ,
k
23698.00 3810.00
1402.00
C L MW
TC
Cost ($/MW) = TC /MW
k
Bus
G1
P
ij
Total
P
(MW)
t,k
111026.37
1984.56 557.44
7.9772 13..936
VI. CONCLUSION
In a restructured power environment, the transmission
network is the key mechanism for generators to compete,
supplying large users and distribution companies. One of the
main objectives in electric industrys restructuring is to bring
fairness and open access to the transmission network.
The Authors have using Bialeks tracing method,
developed an algorithm which will ensure a major practical
implementation of fair rules in the allocation of transmission
line pricing and usage in the Nigerian electricity industry
which is currently undergoing restructuring. Results obtained
thereto by the Authors will be presented in the final
submission.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] National Electric Power Policy, Adopted by the Electric
Power Sector Reform Implementation Committee and
Approved by the National Council on Privatization,
October, 2000.
[2] M. Malliaris, Modeling the behavior of the S & P 500
index: a neural network approach, Proceedings of the
Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for
Applications, pp. 86-90, 1994.
[3] G. Koreneff, A. Seppala, M. Lehtonen, V. Kekkonen, E.
Laitinen, J. Hakli and E. Antila Electricity spot price
forecasting as a part of energy management in
restructured power market, Proc. Of International
Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery
(EMPD 98), vol. 1, pp. 223-228, 1998.
[4] A. Atiya, N. Talat and S. Shaheen, An efficient stock
market forecasting
model using neural networks,
Proceedings of International Conference on Neural
Networks, vol. 4, pp. 2112-2115, 1997.
[5] N. Baba and M. Kozaki, An intelligent forecasting
system of stock neural networks, Proceedings of
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(IJCNN 92), vol. 1, pp. 371 377, 1992.
[6] J. Synder, J. Sweat, M. Richardson and D. Pattie,
Developing neural networks to forecast agriculture
commodity prices, Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,
vol. 4, pp. 516 522, 1992.
[7] B. Szkuta, L. Sanabria, L., and T. Dillon, Electricity
price short-term forecasting using artificial neural
networks, IEEE Transactions on Power System vol. 14,
no. 3, pp. 851-857, August, 1999.
[8] D. Shirmohammadi, X. Filho, B. Gorenstin and M.
Pereira, Some fundamental technical concepts about
cost based transmission pricing, IEEE Trans. on Power
Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1002-1008, May 1996.
Generation,
Transmission
and
Distribution, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 313-320, July, 1996.
[17] D. Kirchen, R. Allan and G. Strbac, Contribution of
individual generators to loads and flows, IEEE Trans. on
Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 52-60, February 1997.
[9]