Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
3:32 PM
Accounting Theory
Many people say that they do not need theories; that by definition theories are not practical or useful in the
real world. However, theories are necessary for us to try to understand the world we live in.
Accounting viewed as a practical discipline
Rule focussed
With little use for theory
However, theory is necessary to
Understand the world we live in
Provide a basis for decision making
All accounting is premised on theories
Concepts of Materiality
Recognition Criteria
Relevance
Faithful Representation
The Conceptual Framework
Measurement Bases
THEORY
A belief or principle that guides actions or behaviour
An idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain something
The set of principles on which a subject is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event
Accounting Theory
A description, explanation or a prediction [of accounting practice] based on observations and/or logical
reasoning
Logical reasoning in the form of a set of broad principles that (1) provide a general framework of reference by
which accounting practice can be evaluated and (2) guide the development of new practice and procedures
Different Theories
Some of these theories explain
Some of these theories predict
Some of these theories conflict
Different Accounting Theories
Some accounting theories
Describe and explain current practice
Capital Market Theory
Predict practice
Agency Theory
Provide principles for decision making
Identify problems and deficiencies and offer solutions
The conceptual framework
Types Of Theories
1. positive theories
2. normative theories.
Positive Theories
Positive theories are about the world as it is.
They
Describe what is happening
Explain what is happening
Make predictions about what will happen
Based around Hypotheses
Also called empirical theories
Normative Theories
Make suggestions about
What should happen
What ought to be
Observations or facts are considered in development of normative theories
Page 2
Page 3
3:54 PM
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
History And Evolution Of The Conceptual Framework
1920s and 1930s attempts to draft statements of principles to guide accounting.
1970s development of more comprehensive and formal conceptual frameworks
1989 the existing Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements issued by the IASB
2010 the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued by the IASB
The Structure And Components Of The Conceptual Framework
The Conceptual Framework can be seen as providing answers to questions such as:
- What is the purpose of financial statements?
- Who are they prepared for?
- What are the assumptions to be made when preparing financial statements?
- What type of information should be included?
- What are the elements that make up financial statements?
- When should the elements of financial statements be included?
Current Developments
In 2004, the IASB and FASB began undertaking a project to develop a common framework.
The project is being conducted in eight phases
a. objectives and qualitative characteristics.
b. elements and recognition
c. measurement
d. reporting entity
e. presentation and disclosure
f. purpose and status
g. application to not-for-profit entities
h. remaining issues
Purpose, Objective And Underlying Assumption
The Conceptual Framework states that it is concerned with general purpose financial reports.
- These are financial reports intended to meet the needs of users who are not in a position to require an entity
to prepare reports tailored to their particular information needs.
Not special purpose financial reports
Proposed definition of a reporting entity
Page 4
3. Comparability
- Achieved with consistent measurement and presentation of items over time and between entities
4. Verifiability
- Information can be supported or confirmed so that users are confident in relying on it
5. Timeliness
- Users need information on a timely basis
6. Understandability
- Financial reports are prepared for users who
- have reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities, and
- will conduct a diligent review and analysis of the information
Recognition Criteria
Recognition is the process of incorporating an item in the balance sheet or income statement . . . It involves
depiction of the item in words and by a monetary amount and the inclusion of that amount in the balance sheet or
income statement totals.
Two tests for recognition
1. Probability
2. Measurability
Probability
- an element should be recognized if
(a) it is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to or from the
entity
- Probability criteria is met if the event if more likely than not to occur.
Reliable Measurement
- an element should be recognized if
(b) the item has a cost or value that can be measured with reliability.
Page 6
(b) the item has a cost or value that can be measured with reliability.
- Estimation is acceptable
- Either a cost or a value
The Benefits Of A Conceptual Framework
Technical Benefits
- Improve the practice of accounting and to provide a basis for answers to specific accounting questions and
problems.
- It is stated that the Conceptual Framework does this in two ways:
- By providing a basis and guidance for those who set the specific accounting rules.
- By helping individuals involved in preparing or auditing or using financial statements.
Political Benefits
- Prevent political interference in setting accounting standards.
- Accounting information has significant real-world affects
Professional Benefits
- Protect the professional status of accounting and accountants.
Page 7
3:32 PM
Principles-based standards are based on a conceptual framework that provides a broad basis for accountants to follow
- The focus is on the economic substance of a transaction, engaging the professional judgement and expertise of
those preparing financial statements.
Disadvantages of Rules-Based Standards
Rules-based standards can be very complex.
Organisations can structure transactions to circumvent unfavourable reporting.
Standards are likely to be incomplete or even obsolete by the time they are issued.
Manipulated compliance with rules makes auditing more difficult.
Advantages of Principles-Based Standards
Principles-based standards are simpler.
They supply broad guidelines that can be applied to many situations.
They improve the representational faithfulness of financial statements.
They allow accountants to use their professional judgement.
Evidence suggests that managers are less likely to attempt earnings management.
Concludes that regulation is supplied in response to the demands of the public for the correction of these
inefficient or inequitable market practices.
Capture Theory
Capture theory holds that regulation is supplied in response to the demands of self-interested groups trying to
maximise the incomes or interests of their members.
People are rational utility maximisers.
The coercive power of government can be used to give valuable benefits to particular groups.
Regulation can be viewed as a product that is governed by the laws of supply and demand.
Bushfire Theory
Bushfire theory highlights the political and public nature of regulatory influences by attempting to take into
account the reactions of users, and society in general, to failures of regulatory processes.
Regulations tend to arise from crises.
Resulting rules do not necessarily deal with the issues that caused the crisis.
Rather they gain media exposure so that politicians are more likely to gain re-election.
Ideology Theory of Regulation
Ideology theory of regulation relies on market failure but introduces the role of lobbying in influencing the
actions of regulators.
Lobbying is viewed as a mechanism through which regulators are informed about policy issues.
Predicts that the effectiveness of regulation will depend on
the political ideologies of the regulators, and
the impact of special interest lobby groups.
Advantages of Regulation
Increased efficiency in allocating capital.
Cheaper production.
Check on perquisites.
Public confidence.
Standardisation.
Public good.
Disadvantages of Regulation
Difficult to achieve efficiency and equity.
Determining the optimal quantity of information is problematic.
Regulation is difficult to reverse.
Communication is restricted.
Reporting entities are different.
There is lobbying.
Monopolisation of accounting standards.
Theory And Accounting Regulation Research
There are few accounting studies which apply regulatory theories to standards setting.
The majority of such studies support a version of regulatory capture.
the shift of accounting regulation to the private IASB has been caused by the sheer dominance of a highly
organized financial sector . . . [whose] actors are the best connected and most represented in the standardsetting network
Political Nature Of Setting Accounting Standards
There is a mix of private and public participation in the standard setting process.
Parties that have an interest in accounting standards often have conflicting interests. E.g.
Internal stakeholders may like flexibility
External stakeholders may like comparability
Auditors like objective (auditable) reporting
Page 9
Lobbying
Those affected by accounting standards have an incentive to lobby standard setters to achieve a favourable
outcome.
Those affected must decide:
Whether they should lobby.
Which method of lobbying they should use.
When they should lobby.
What arguments they should use to support their position.
Lobby Groups
Industry and Management
Highly motivated and resourced
Casual non-professional users
Disparate interests, few resources
Full-time professional users
Secretive and non-responsive
Auditors
Accused of self-interest
Academics
Strangely quiet
Lobby Groups in Australia
G100
Large accounting firms
Professional accounting bodies
ASX
Major banks
International Lobby Groups
International Accounting Standards Board
European Union
Asian-Oceanian Standard-Setters Group
G20
International Organisation of Securities Commissions
FASB
Harmonisation
One of the functions of the AASB is to participate in and contribute to the development of a single set of
worldwide accounting standards.
Three main benefits have been identified
i. International comparability
ii. Reduced cost of capital
iii. Reduced conflicting reporting requirements
Problems with Harmonisation
Various methods of implementation leads to inconsistencies
Listed entities underestimated the complexities, effects and cost of IFRSs
Compromise leads to diversity
Page 10
Chapter 4 Measurement
Thursday, October 29, 2015
3:32 PM
Measurement In Accounting
Conceptual framework definition:
MEASUREMENT is the process of determining the monetary amounts at which the elements of the financial
statements are to be recognized and carried in the balance sheet and income statement.
May involve calculation, estimation, and/or apportionment.
Impacts quality and therefore usefulness
Benefits of Measurement
1. Makes financial statements decision useful - gives meaning to the items included
Allows users of accounting information to:
2. Assess an entitys financial performance and position
3. Compare the entitys performance and position over time.
4. Compare entities
Limitations of Measurement
1. Little or no agreement on what measures should be used.
2. The inherent flexibility and the nature of a mixed measurement approach reduces comparability.
3. Measurement can be quite subjective.
4. With flexibility comes opportunistic accounting choices.
5. The current approach results in the additivity problem.
Measurement Approaches And Accounting Standards
The Conceptual Framework does not provide guidance as to which measurement bases should be used
In reality a range of bases are used
Historic cost remains dominant
Steady shift towards fair value
Historical Cost
Assets are recorded at the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of consideration given to
acquire them at the time of their acquisition. Liabilities are recorded at the amount of proceeds received in
exchange for the obligation, or in some circumstances (for example, income taxes), at the amounts of cash or
cash equivalents expected to be paid to satisfy the liability in the normal course of business.
Current Cost - Replacement Cost
Assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that would have to be paid if the same or an
equivalent asset was acquired currently. Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash
equivalents that would be required to settle the obligation currently.
Fair Value - Realizable or Settlement Value
Assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that could currently be obtained by selling the asset
in an orderly disposal. Liabilities are carried at their settlement values; that is, the undiscounted amounts of cash
or cash equivalents expected to be paid to satisfy the liabilities in the normal course of business.
Present Value
Assets are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash inflows that the item is expected to
generate in the normal course of business. Liabilities are carried at the present discounted value of the future net
cash out flows that are expected to be required to settle liabilities in the normal course of business.
Deprival Value
Essentially the loss that would be suffered if an entity was deprived of the asset.
Determination of the deprival value of an asset may incorporate:
- present value if the item was held for use
Page 11
Page 12
Faithful Representation
Understandability
Comparability
Historic Cost
Low:
High:
especially as time passes measures an objective
transaction
High:
concept well known
& understood
Medium:
purchasing power of
money changes
Current Cost
High:
indicative of future
potential
High:
determined by
reference to actual cost
Low:
can be subjective,
depends
Medium:
can be subjective,
depends
Present Value
High:
indicative of future
potential
Low:
can be very subjective
Medium:
assumptions used
can be complex
Medium:
involves many different
assumptions
Deprival Value
Low:
not related to business
care
Low:
can be very subjective
Low:
assumptions used
can be complex
Low:
Involves many different
assumptions
Focuses on future
potential
Determined using
objective market prices
Simply
Focus on market value
representation of
not individual entity
current market value
Often based on
Different models lead
complex assumptions to very different results
and calculation
There appears to have been a distinct move from historical cost to fair value accounting.
Valuation Methods
Market Approach
Cost Approach
Income Approach
The impact and relevance of measurement to investors and other users of the financial statements is obvious.
What do users really need to know?
How do users influence the measurement approach?
Existing and Potential Investors
Concerned with the risk inherent in, and the return provided by, their investments.
They want accounting information that:
Assists them in deciding whether to buy, hold, or sell their shares.
Enables them to assess the entitys ability to pay dividends.
Therefore need forward looking information
Fair Value?
Creditors/Lenders
Interested in information that enables them to determine whether amounts owing to them will be paid when due.
Particularly interested in the entitys net position
Liabilities it has compared to its assets.
Fair value would seem to be the most useful approach, assuming that items can be reliably measured.
Page 15
3:32 PM
Contracting Theory
- Suggests that the organisation is characterised as a legal nexus of contracts.
- With contracting parties having rights and responsibilities under these contracts.
- Positive accounting theory focuses on
managerial contracts, and
debt contracts,
- These are agency contracts used to manage relationships where there is a separation between management
and capital providers.
Agency Theory
- Used to understand relationships whereby a principal employs the services of, and delegates the decision
making authority to, an agent. Fiduciary relationship, trust and confidence.
- Creates a moral hazard.
- Leads to 3 costs
i. Monitoring costs, as how principal measure and observe the behaviour of the agent
ii. Bonding costs, as cost of monitoring would eventually be charged against the agent in the disguise of
low remuneration.
iii. Residual loss, at the end, it is hard or too costly to determine whether the agent will push for the
interest of the principal
OwnerManager Agency Relationships
- Agency theory identifies a number of problems that can exist between managers and owners.
- Contracts and accounting information can be used to bond the interests of owners and managers.
- Addresses 3 specific problems
Page 16
Page 17
Legitimacy Theory
- Based on the idea of a social contract
Relates to the explicit and implicit expectations society has about how businesses should act to ensure
they survive into the future.
Organisations need to show they are operating in accordance with the expectations in the social
contract.
- Organisational legitimacy
The values and norm evident in the social contract have changed over time.
In the past legitimacy was considered only in terms of economic performance.
Now businesses are now expected to consider a range of issues, including the environmental and social
consequences of their activities.
- Accounting Disclosures and Legitimation
Lindblom identifies four ways an organisation can obtain or maintain legitimacy:
1) Seek to educate and inform society about actual changes in the organisations performance and
activities
2) Seek to change the perceptions of society, but not actually change behaviour
3) Seek to manipulate perception by deflecting attention from the issue of concern to other related
issues
4) Seek to change expectations of its performance.
Disclosure of information about an organisations effect on, or relationship with society can be used in
each of the strategies.
An entity might provide information to offset negative news which may be publicly available.
An organisation may draw attention to strengths.
Public reporting through the annual report or the entity website can be a powerful tool in showing an
organisation is meeting the expectations of society.
Stakeholder Theory
- Considers the relationships that exist between the organisation and its various stakeholders.
- Stakeholders are any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievements of an
organisations objectives
- There are two versions of stakeholder theory
a normative theory, known as the ethical branch,
an empirical theory of management, which is a positive theory
Normative Branch of Stakeholder Theory
Argues that organisations should treat all their stakeholders fairly.
An organisation should be managed for the benefit of all its stakeholders.
Stakeholders are identified, and should be considered in organisational decisions because of their
interest in the activities of the organisation.
Managerial Branch of Stakeholder Theory
Seeks to explain how stakeholders influence organisational actions.
The extent to which an organisation will consider its stakeholders is related to the power or influence
of those stakeholders.
A stakeholders power is related to the degree of control they have over resources required by the
organisation.
Stakeholder theory has been used to examine disclosure of voluntary information to stakeholders,
most commonly relating to social and environmental performance.
Contingency Theory
Proposes that organisations are all affected by a range of factors that differ across organisations.
Organisations need to adapt their structure to take into account a range of factors such as
External environment.
Organisational size.
Business strategy.
Contingency frameworks have been used to evaluate management accounting information and internal
control systems.
They conclude that
There is no universally appropriate accounting system that can be applied to all organisations.
Features of appropriate accounting systems are contingent upon the specific circumstances the
organisation faces.
Accounting Estimates
Agency contracts can explain managerial decisions in this regard.
- Managers and accountants, acting in self interest, are likely to ensure their own bonuses are maximised and
the entity is not at risk of breaching debt contracts.
Legitimacy and stakeholder theory suggest there are times entities, for political reasons, will actively reduce their
reported profits.
Disclosure Policy
Disclosure policy relates to additional disclosure within the annual report or media releases.
Stakeholder theory would explain these disclosures in terms of providing relevant information to maintain
relationships with powerful stakeholders.
Legitimacy theory sees voluntary disclosure as a way of maintaining or regaining legitimacy by demonstrating how
the entity is meeting societal expectations.
Page 19
3:32 PM
Electronic Reporting
Page 21
Electronic Reporting
Using websites, message boards and blogs.
Both financial and non-financial information is disclosed on reporting entities websites.
Only some, or none, of this may be audited.
The IASB has developed a code of conduct for Internet reporting.
Boundaries of reports should be clear.
Content of should be the same as the paper-based reports.
Reports should be complete, clearly dated and timely.
Information should be user friendly and downloadable.
Information should be secured to ensure reliability.
Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)
XBRL is a language for electronic communication of financial data.
It standardises presentation.
It makes possible continuous disclosure by reporting entities.
It offers cost savings.
It improves efficiency, accuracy and reliability.
Why Entities Voluntarily Disclose
Mandated accounting information is constrained.
Definition of users is limited.
Organisations require and desire broad support.
They have multiple responsibilities.
Variety of information is necessary to satisfy and inform range of stakeholders.
Management Motivation to Disclose
1. To comply with legal requirements
2. Because of economic rationality arguments
3. Because of accountability to stakeholders
4. Because of borrowing requirements
5. To comply with community expectations
6. To ward off threats to organisational legitimacy
7. To manage powerful stakeholders
8. To forestall regulations
9. To comply with industry requirements
10. To win reporting awards
Page 22