What Led To Separation in 1965

8/6/2015
Behindthescenes:Whatledtoseparationin1965,OpinionNews&TopStoriesTheStraitsTimes
THE STRAITS TIMES
Behind the scenes: What led to

separation in 1965
Edmund Lim
PUBLISHED AUG 5, 2015, 5:00 AM SGT

Was Singapore expelled from the Malaysia federation or was the split
based on mutual consent? A PhD student pieces together a behind-thescenes version of events to suggest it was the latter.
On Aug 9, 1965, towards the end of a press conference after Singapore became independent, Mr Lee
Kuan Yew said: "There is nothing to be worried about. Many things will go on just as usual. But be
firm, be calm. We are going to have a multiracial nation in Singapore. We will set the example. This
is not a Malay nation, this is not a Chinese nation, this is not an Indian nation. Everybody will have
his place: equal; language, culture, religion."
Mr Lee's call for unity amid diversity in our multiracial society remains relevant half a century later.
Fifty years on, as we near the jubilee year of Independence, it's timely to look back at events leading
to the Aug 9 separation.
What were the events and the plans that led to that pivotal break?
http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/behindthesceneswhatledtoseparationin1965
1/7
8/6/2015
Mr Lee Kuan Yew at a press conference at TV Singapore on the separation of Singapore from Malaysia on Aug 9,
1965. ST FILE PHOTO
What happened behind the scenes? Was Singapore "booted out" by Malaysia or was it a mutually
agreed decision?
While researching for my doctorate in history, I set myself the task of piecing together, from
available records, a picture of what happened in the weeks leading up to Aug 9, 1965.
NEGOTIATING THE FUTURE
In July and September 1964, there were racial riots which led to damage, serious injuries and loss of
lives in Singapore. On the economic front, the common market of Peninsular Malaysia and
Singapore did not materialise.
2/7
8/6/2015
With the right will, proactive attitude and purposeful plans, we can succeed, even in
the midst of great difficulty and challenges. The determination to succeed and the
united perseverance to work for the benefit of our nation are among the key
factors which contributed to the nation's development.
In November 1964, the then Malaysian Finance Minister Tan Siew Sin proposed raising an extra
RM147 million in taxes.
This could have led to Singapore taxpayers contributing more than 35 per cent towards the federal
budget, although the Singapore population comprised only about 17 per cent of the whole
population in Malaysia at that time.
Furthermore, the proposed turnover and payroll tax would seriously affect businessmen in
Singapore. The Malaysian Finance Minister also wanted to increase the contribution of Singapore to
the federal government from 40 to 60 per cent of its revenue.
In addition, there were increasing tension and differences between the People's Action Party
leaders in Singapore and the leaders in the Malaysian central government.
According to Ms Tan Siok Sun's biography, Goh Keng Swee: A Portrait, on Jan 22, 1965, Malaysian
Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman wrote to Dr Goh Keng Swee and offered Singapore full
autonomy, except in foreign and defence matters, in exchange for Singapore giving up its seats in
the Federal Parliament.
Singapore Prime Minister Lee was involved in a series of discussions with the Malaysian leaders but
"all these (negotiations) came to nought", as noted by Dr Goh. Dr Goh recalled, during his interview
with Dr Melanie Chew in the book Leaders Of Singapore: "In the early days there were a lot of
discussions about changing the terms of Malaysia by the Prime Minister, Rajaratnam and Toh Chin
Chye. It got nowhere."
On June 6, 1965, there was the Malaysian Solidarity Convention at the Singapore National Theatre,
where Mr Lee advocated a "Malaysian Malaysia". This upset certain Malaysian Umno leaders.
Around July 13, Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Tun Razak asked Dr Goh, who was then
Singapore's Minister for Finance, to visit him in his Kuala Lumpur home. The then Malaysian
Minister for Home Affairs Ismail Abdul Rahman was also present at that meeting.
Ms Tan wrote that during this critical discussion, Tun Razak commented: "We can't go on like this."
LET'S CALL IT QUITS
3/7
8/6/2015
Dr Goh said that when he and Mr Lee first proposed the merger, they did not expect the situation
with Malaysia to deteriorate to this level, "so the best thing would be to call it quits; we should go
our separate ways". Dr Goh recalled: "I just want to get out. I could see no future in it; the political
cost was dreadful and the economic benefits, well, didn't exist."
Dr Goh proposed: "Well, we leave Malaysia, become an independent state, and you will be relieved
of all these troubles, and we would also be relieved of troubles from you. All these tensions that have
built up, communal tensions, will all be over. We are on our own, you are on your own."
Tun Razak requested Dr Goh to ask Mr Lee about his views on this matter. On July 20, 1965, there
was a second meeting in Tun Razak's office. Dr Goh met Tun Razak and Dr Ismail. Dr Goh said Mr
Lee was in favour of the secession of Singapore to become independent. This was to be done no
later than Aug 9 as Parliament would reconvene that day and the Bill for the Independence of
Singapore would be introduced.
According to Dr Chew, Dr Goh was recorded as saying: "Now on the 20th of July 1965, I met Tun
Razak and Dr Ismail. Now this is the 20th July 1965. I persuaded him that the only way out was for
Singapore to secede completely."
Dr Goh stated: "You want to get Singapore out and it must be done very quickly. And very quietly,
and presented as fait accompli."
Dr Goh commented that Tun Razak and Dr Ismail agreed with the separation. "In fact, they
themselves had come to the conclusion that Singapore must get out. The question was how to get
Singapore out," said Dr Goh.
In that oral history interview, Dr Chew remarked: "So the secession of Singapore was well planned
by you and Tun Razak! It was not foisted on Singapore."
Dr Goh responded: "No, it was not."
Mr Lee stated in his memoirs, The Singapore Story: "Keng Swee came back to report that Razak
wanted a total hiving-off. Razak had made two points: first, he wanted Keng Swee to confirm I was
in favour. Keng Swee said, 'Yes, provided it is done quickly before Lee's commitment and
involvement in the Solidarity Convention makes it impossible for him to get out.' Ismail accepted
this point. Razak appeared both relieved and incredulous because, according to Keng Swee, he halfexpected me to reject the idea. Keng Swee said I was realistic enough to see that a collision was
imminent and that the consequences were incalculable."
Specific plans were made from July onwards. For the third meeting on July 27, Dr Goh took along a
letter of authorisation signed by Mr Lee dated July 26. The letter stated: "I authorise Goh Keng Swee
to discuss with Tun Razak, Dato Ismail and such other federal ministers of comparable authority
concerned in these matters in Central Government any proposal for any constitutional
arrangements of Malaysia."
4/7
8/6/2015
THE SECRET DRAFT

From July to August 1965, Mr Eddie Barker, the Singapore Minister for Law, prepared the
constitutional documents and agreements for separation. In the oral history interview with the
National Archives, Mr Barker said: "Sometime in the middle of July 1965, I was summoned by the
Prime Minister to his office. He asked me whether I thought our Attorney-General could be asked to
draft an agreement for the separation of Singapore from Malaysia, and if he did, whether we could
keep it a secret. I replied that the Attorney-General was the best man for the job but I was afraid
others would get to know about the proposal. The Prime Minister then asked whether I could draft
the agreement. I replied that I would try."
Mr Lee recalled: "Eddie drafted the two documents, but I asked him to draw up a third, a
proclamation of independence."
There was a fourth meeting on Aug 3, 1965, at Tun Razak's office, again involving Dr Goh. Tun
Razak confirmed that Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman was in favour of the
separation plan.
Dr Goh also discussed with Tun Razak and Dr Ismail the defence proposals. Few people in
Singapore were aware of these plans for separation. The British leaders were not aware of these
separation plans until Aug 8.
On Aug 6, 1965, Dr Goh and Mr Barker had a final meeting with the Malaysian leaders such as Tun
Razak, Dr Ismail and Malaysian Attorney-General Abdul Kadir Yusof to discuss the draft of the
Separation Agreement.
Dr Goh said: "My role as a negotiator was to get the Malay leaders into a mood in which they will
accept the Separation Agreement with the minimum fuss and bother And so far as the drafting
and discussions of the actual text of the Agreement, well, Mr Eddie Barker had to do that."
Mr Lee recounted in an interview with Fred Emery at the studios of Television Singapore: "On
Friday (Aug 6), my Finance Minister, Dr Goh Keng Swee, rang me He is now Minister for Defence
and Security He said I have to come down (from Cameron Highlands). It was very urgent. So that
afternoon, I packed my bag and came down alone, leaving my family up there. I came down that
afternoon and arrived at about dinner time In Kuala Lumpur, he told me, 'This is it'."
BLOODLESS COUP
The drafting of the agreement of separation of Singapore from Malaysia was started in July 1965, at
the instruction of Mr Lee. The Independence of Singapore Agreement 1965 was signed and dated
Aug 7.
When Mr Barker handed the signed documents to Mr Lee, Mr Lee recalled saying to him: "Thanks,
Eddie, we have pulled off a bloodless coup."
5/7
8/6/2015
In his memoirs, Mr Lee stated: "At very little notice, we had thought of a way to achieve what the
Tunku could not accomplish with his own staff because it had to be carried out in great secrecy and
the shortest possible time, including three readings of a Bill in one session of Parliament on a
certificate of urgency, or it could never have succeeded."
Dr Ooi Kee Beng from the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies stated a key point regarding the
separation in his biography of Dr Ismail.
In the memoirs of Tun Dr Ismail, then Malaysian Home Affairs Minister who later became Deputy
Prime Minister, Dr Ismail noted as a first-hand witness and participant of these historical
developments that "in spite of what was believed, the separation of Singapore from Malaysia was by
mutual agreement".
In Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's eulogy speech on March 29 this year, he recalled: "I remember
the night the children slept on the floor in my parents' bedroom at Temasek House in Kuala
Lumpur, because the house was full of ministers who had come up from Singapore. Every so often,
my father would get up from the bed to make a note about something, before lying down to rest
again. But obviously he wasn't asleep. The date was 7 August 1965, two days before Separation."
It was indeed a very challenging time.
On the eve of Aug 9, 1965, Mr Lee Kuan Yew prepared the coded messages that were to be sent to
three Commonwealth prime ministers to inform them of the separation. The first sentence of the
message to the Australian leader went thus: "By the time you have decoded this message you will
know that the Tunku has proclaimed and I have agreed and simultaneously also proclaimed
Singapore as a separate and sovereign nation."
On Aug 9, 1965, at 10am, the Malaysian Parliament reconvened and Prime Minister Tunku Abdul
Rahman explained the nature and details of the Separation. There was a vote on the Constitution of
Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Bill 1965 to allow Singapore to separate from the Malaysian
federation. It was unanimous, 126-0.
Singapore became an independent and sovereign state.
That morning, Mr Lee explained the reasons for separation to the British, Australian, Indian and
New Zealand High Commission representatives.
In the afternoon of Aug 9, 1965, he announced on Caldecott Hill, in the television studio, the
independence of Singapore.
In a subsequent television broadcast, Mr Lee stated in his determined manner: "I have a few million
people's lives to account for. Singapore will survive."
6/7
8/6/2015
The separation might appear as a surprise to many. However, it was a mutual agreement between
the top leaders of Malaysia and Singapore, with the understanding and support of Singapore
Cabinet ministers such as Mr Lim Kim San and Mr Barker.
The other ministers, such as Dr Toh Chin Chye and Mr S. Rajaratnam, were also persuaded to
accept this decision for separation. Amid the diversity in the Singapore Cabinet, there was unity.
With the dynamic leadership of Singapore's founding fathers and the strong support of its people,
this multiracial nation has survived and thrived, against the odds.
Singaporeans can learn from our founding fathers such as Mr Lee and Dr Goh. With the right will,
proactive attitude and purposeful plans, we can succeed, even in the midst of great difficulty and
challenges.
The determination to succeed and the united perseverance to work for the benefit of our nation are
among the key factors which contributed to the nation's development.
The pioneer team of leaders was made up of talented, capable and committed Singaporeans such as
Mr Lee, Dr Goh, Dr Toh, Mr Rajaratnam, Mr Lim, Mr Othman Wok, Mr Barker and Mr Hon Sui Sen.
They collaborated and complemented each other, as they contributed actively to the young nation.
During the years after our independence, the evident trust and teamwork among the leaders,
together with the support of the people, enabled the country and government to strengthen and
grow.
In the final recorded words of Mr Lee at the Aug 9, 1965, press conference at the Broadcasting
House: "We unite regardless of race, language, religion, culture."
As we Singaporeans remember our history and celebrate our nation's 50th birthday, let us build on
our legacy, plan for the future and work together as one united people, "so as to achieve happiness,
prosperity and progress for our nation".
The writer is a Singaporean pursuing his PhD at Nanyang Technological University.
SPH Digital News / Copyright 2015 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn. No. 198402868E.
All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions| Data Protection Policy
7/7

What Led To Separation in 1965

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

What Led To Separation in 1965

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

8/6/2015

THE STRAITS TIMES

Behind the scenes: What led to

PUBLISHED AUG 5, 2015, 5:00 AM SGT

THE SECRET DRAFT

Você também pode gostar