Page 1

Melinda Hampshire Registrar

18-4-2016

Melinda.Hampshire@courts.vic.gov.au & registry.ballarat@countycourt.vic.gov.au

Cc:

Mr Peter Kidd CJ County Court of Victoria, feedback@countycourt.vic.gov.au

Buloke Shire Council buloke@buloke.vic.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au & attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
Elliott Stafford and Associated
lawyers@elliottstafford.com.au
County Court of Victoria crim.reg@countycourt.vic.gov.au
Mr Garry McIntosh, Associate to His Honour Mullaly J. judgemullaly.chambers@countycourt.vic.gov.au
Re: 20160418-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Melinda Hampshire Registrar-Re APPEAL-15-2502--Re corrections-etc

Melinda,

I indicated in my 17 April 2016 correspondence that the court could hear and determine
my appeal (subject to the OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION) upon the basis of the
ADDRESS TO THE COURT and its supplements, in addition to the 30 October 2015 filed
ADDRESS TO THE COURT before His Honour Mullally J.
I refer to the orders against which the appeal is that ON 17 September 2015 the Magistrates
Court of Victoria based its orders upon submissions from the bar table (without evidence) as to
cost regarding alleged documents provided by me (via email). As such the court must have
deemed that electronic filing was part of the proceedings. Itys failure to consider the same is a
different issue. What is therefore the issue is that both Buloke Shire Council and the court relied
upon electronic provided material by me was part of the proceedings. Hence my written
submissions in my written submissions in my 2-2-2016 ADDRESS TO THE COURT and
supplements must be deemed to be part of the court file.
I may clarify that the document refers to HEARING DATE 22-2-2006 this ought to be 22-22016, as the document is dated in the left side of the footing as 2-2-2016.
Further, the Supplement dated 17-2-2016 incorrectly refers to Supplement 1, this is to be read as
Supplement 2. The Supplement dated 16-3-2016 incorrectly refers to supplement 4 this ought to
be read as Supplement 5. This will be as follows:
Writting submissions in the ADDRESS TO THE COURT dated 2-2-2016 (70 pages)
Supplement 1 dated 14-2-2016 (22 pages)
Supplement 2 dated 17-2-2016 (18 pages)
Supplement 3 dated 22-2-2016 (47 pages)
Supplement 4 dated 10-3-2016 (50 pages)
Supplement 5 dated 16-3-2016 (45 pages)
Supplement 6 dated 18-3-2016 (23 pages) Total= 275 pages

I look forwards to your reply and confirming appropriate resolve to the issues raised in this
correspondence.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)
p1
18-4-2016
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, See also
Http://www.schorel-hlavka.com Blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati