TSD Facts

PROJECT PROPOSAL
FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

(TSD) PROGRAMME
PROJECT TITLE
Design and Development of FACTS Controllers

for Real Time Applications in Power Systems
SUBMITTED BY
Dr.P.V. BALASUBRAHMANYAM
(Name of Principal Investigator)
CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
GANDIPET, HYDERABAD-75, PIN: 500075

(Name and Address of the Organization)
30-01-2014
(Date of Submission)
FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL

FOR SUPPORT
UNDER
(TSD) PROGRAMME
CONTENTS
S.No
1
ITEMS
Cover Sheet
Page No(s)
3-6
Project Summary
Core Proposal
Bio-Data of the Principal Investigator/ CoPrincipal Investigator
Budget Estimates
Undertaking from the Principal

Investigator
Endorsement from Head Of the Organisation
Endorsement from Collaborating Industry/

Agency
7-12
NA
1. COVER SHEET
For office use
File No:
Date of Receipt:
1.
Project Title:

2.
3.
Principal Investigator (PI):

Name
: Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM
Designation
: PROFESSOR
Address
: EEE DEPARTMENT, CBIT, GANDIPET, HYDERABAD-75
Telephone No
: +91-0948 345 7276
E-mail
: Peribalu@gmail.com
Date of birth
: 07/31/1952
Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI)

Name
Designation
Address
Telephone No
E-mail
Date of birth
4.
Names and Addresses of Collaborating Organizations
----NA-----
5.
Name and Address of participating Industry (if any)
----NA-----
6.
Duration of the Project
7.
Budget for the Project
: 04 years
(Amount in Lakhs of Rupees)
S.No
ITEM
1st
Year
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DST Share
2nd
3rd
Year
Year
Development of software for

optimal placement of damping
controllers
Non recurring
Recurring
Development of software for

coordination of controller
parameters.
Non recurring
Recurring
Design, development and

testing of PSS controllers
Non recurring
Recurring
Design, development and

testing of FACTS
supplementary controllers
Non recurring
Recurring
Workshop / Seminar
Total
4th
Year
Total
Other
Agencies
Share
8.
Project Objectives (In bullet form)

Development of generic software to coordinate various types of damping
controllers. This can be used for optimal tuning of the control parameters.
Development
of
proto-type
PSS
and
FACTS
controls
in
real-time
environment using MATLAB and other Electrical simulation softwares like

PSCAD etc.
A low power (5-10kW) Different FACTS models along with a model of
transmission network is to be fabricated for experimental purposes in the
laboratory. Simulation studies of this laboratory model under steady state
and dynamic conditions will be compared with experimental results. This
experience will greatly help the utilities to integrate different FACTS
models in the network.
Design of Power System Stabilizer parameters: Small signal and transient
stability studies considering appropriate machine models and to study the
effect of machine modeling on PSS parameters.
Identification of location and size of FACT controller to improve
stability
Coordinated operation of controlled devices
Application of new control theory such as nonlinear, adaptive and artificial
intelligence (fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks, expert systems, H etc)
based techniques in the design of controllers
Advantages of implementing PSS and FACTS controllers are:
Increased transmission system reliability and availability
Increased dynamic and transient grid stability
Increased quality of supply for sensitive industries
Decreased overall system transmission losses
On-completion
of
the
project,
International/National
level
workshop /seminar can be organized and trained the Power System

Engineers in understanding the working and use of different FACTS
Controllers
UG and PG students can also learn from hands on experience on the

models
9.
Deliverables (In bullet form)
10.
Names and Addresses of identified User Agencies
11.
Names and Addresses of identified other Beneficiaries
12.
List of Equipment with Cost
2. PROJECT SUMMARY
1.
Project Title:

2. Principal Investigator:
(Name, Designation and Affiliation)
Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM
PROFESSOR, EEE DEPARTMENT
CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
GANDIPET, HYDERABAD-75
3. Collaborating Agencies/Industries
4. Duration
: 03 Years
5. Total Budget
: 25 Lakhs
5.1 DST Share
: 23 Lakhs
5.2 Collaborators Share
: 02 Lakhs
6. Objectives (In bullet form):

Development
of
proto-type
PSS
and
FACTS
controls
in
real-time

PSCAD etc.
laboratory. Simulation studies of this
laboratory model under steady state and dynamic conditions will be
compared with experimental results. This experience will greatly help the
utilities to integrate different FACTS models in the network.

stability
On-completion
of
the
project,
level

Controllers
models
7. Innovative Elements/Components of the Project:
8. Outcome/ Deliverables and their expected Impact (In bullet form):
The outcomes from the projects will be the following:
Development of generic software to coordinate various types of damping controllers. This can
be used for optimal tuning of the control parameters.
Development of proto-type PSS and FACTS controls in real-time environment using
MATLAB and micro-controllers.
Better utilization of existing transmission system
Increased dynamic and transient grid stability and reduction of loop flows
On-completion of the project, International/National level conference will be organized for

dissemination of knowledge.
9. Target Beneficiaries:
Educational institutions
Industries
10. Brief Technical Details (300 words), giving Justifications for
the Project, the underlying Scientific Basis and the Methodology:
10.1 Background
Presently, utilities are operating the system close to thermal limits, due to various practical constraints.
With the advent of power electronics technology, Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS), utilities
are able to control power flow, increase stability limits, improve security of transmission systems and
enhance utilization of the existing power system. The application of power electronics based FACTS
devices gives promising solutions because of their high speed and flexible controllability. Better
controls can increase the stability limit, and then the system can be loaded at a higher level. This
provides better utilization of the transmission network. In recent years the impact of FACTS devices
on power transfer capability enhancement and system loss minimization have been a major concern in
the competitive electric power system.
Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) are popularly being used in power system to improve the
power transfer capability, while improving the system stability. These controllers are provided with
supplementary stabilizing controls for the damping of system oscillations. It is important to study the
control interaction of various controls while designing the parameters. This is to avoid adverse
interaction between the outputs of different controllers acting simultaneously. In most of the cases,
linear approach, eigen value analysis, is adopted in designing the control parameters, which is the
starting point in designing the controller parameters. These parameters need to be checked and fine
tuned through non-linear simulation.
The application of FACTS devices in Indian power sector, has taken up an important role in improving
the stability and power transfer. The FACTS devices are at (i) SVC at Kanpur (ii) Kanpur
Ballabhgarh (FC+TCSC) FACTS transmission line (iii) Raipur Rourkela (FC+TCSC) FACTS
transmission line. Apart from this, regional grids are interconnected through back-to-back HVDC
links. Bulk power transfer is through (i) Rihand Dadri HVDC link (ii) Talcher Kolar HVDC link
and (iii) NER Agra 800kV transmission system.
(i)
Considering the ambitious plans of power sector during 12th plan, numbers of FACTS devices are
being increasingly introduced in Indian power system. Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS)
devices are considered as a new concept in technology based solution to the problem of improving
the stability of the power system and transfer of more active power. More popular FACTS devices
considered world-wide are: TCSC, SVC, TCPS, HVDC, DVR, STATCOM, UPFC, SSSC, etc., to
improve power system performance both in steady state and dynamic state, by providing
controllable real and reactive power. Optimal location of FACTS devices, design of main and
supplementary controls to shall play key role in power flow control.
(ii)
In power system studies, machines are modeled in different orders such as swing equation model,
third order model and seventh order model. These models are to be used appropriately suitable to
the problem under consideration. This is very important specially while designing the controls such
as Power system stabilizer, used to damp the low frequency oscillations of the order of 0.5 3.0
Hz. Generally, the parameters of PSS are designed considering single machine infinite bus (SMIB)
approach and IEEE type PSS. This is termed as fixed control. The gain and time constants
designed at a particular operating point. But, the power system is non-linear, the operating point
keeps changing. Thus, the parameters designed using fixed control may not give satisfactory results
at other operating points. Thus, this necessitates a kind of adaptive control (also known as selftuning control).
Therefore, there is a need to utilize the nonlinear and robust control techniques based on advanced
control techniques such as: Adaptive controls, Fuzzy Logic Controls etc. in designing the power
system controllers and also investigate the interaction of different controllers on the system.
10.2 Description of the proposal

Today, with the development of modern power system and increasing demand for power supply, the
electric power industry is facing a great challenge in meeting the increased load demand with highest
reliability and security by minimum transmission expenditure. More transmission lines are needed.
However, due to the pressure of some practical factors such as environmental and cost considerations,
power engineers can only depend on increasing the transmission capacities of the present transmission
lines to meet the fast growth of energy demands. The FACTS devices have helped in increasing the
transmission capacities of the transmission lines. Therefore, the transmission lines are operating at high
transmission levels. Due to these conditions, the stability margin of a power system has decreased
significantly. Thus new techniques in power system control which can improve the dynamic
performance and transient stability of power systems presents an even more formidable challenge. Fast
controllers are needed to improve the transient stability of power systems. No doubt, excitation
controllers are helpful in the enhancement of stability of power systems but the system stability may
not be maintained when a large fault occurs close to the generator terminal.
It is important to consider the control interaction of various controllers in power system, while
designing the control parameters. Thus, there is a need of optimal tuning and selection of their
parameters and input signals, considering all of the controllers together in the system in a coordinated
manner.
In this project it is proposed to investigate the performance of controllers in real-time: Design and
coordination of power system damping controllers (including PSS, FACTS) in real time environment
using MATLAB and micro controllers
10.3 Justification of the project
10
Designing of PSS parameters is very important and plays key role in maintaining stability of the
system, while damping power oscillations. In general, the PSS parameters are designed using linear
control approach, wherein the power system is linearized at an operating point and the parameters are
obtained through eigenvalue approach. Since, the power system is non-linear, and its operating point
keeps changing, the control parameters designed at an operating point, may not give satisfactory
performance at other points. Therefore, there is a need to design the PSS parameters, and in general the
controller parameters using advanced control techniques to ensure that the controllers will give
satisfactory performance.
The main aim in introducing FACTS devices is to improve the small signal and transient stability
margins. These devices can be used for controlling both static and dynamic stability limits. Optimal
location and sizing of FACTS devices in large power systems play an important role, and this requires
supportive studies.
Controls for FACTS devices: More recently, several utilities have built solid-state electronic power
flow and voltage control devices, generally known as FACTS devices. The FACTS devices, such as
DVR, SVC,TCPS, TCR, TCSC, SSSC, STATCOM, UPFC and IPFC FACTS controllers, can be used
to enhance the stability of power system oscillations. From a small-signal stability viewpoint, these
devices are very effective for damping the relevant inter-area modes. However, the cost of these
devices requires that their use is justified by something other than added power system damping. The
problem is to find their effectiveness in a particular case. Eigenvalue analysis can give a good
indication of the feasibility of their use for damping control.
10.4 Methodology
As more FACTS devices are installed in a power system, their control functions must be carefully
analyzed due to the potential interactions between nearby FACTS devices. Using the multiple-input
signal controller structure, each FACTS controller can be assigned to damp the inter-area modes that it
can affect the most, with minimal impact on the other swing modes. Organizing such a decomposition
of control activities can lead to a hierarchical control scheme coordinating multiple FACTS devices to
improve system security.
Damping control design using these special devices is often best achieved using more advanced
methods than are necessary for power system stabilizers. Power system stabilizers if designed
correctly, are generally quite robust to changes in system parameters and operating conditions. This is
not always true of damping controllers that use these special devices. Keeping this in view, there is a
need to implement different control strategies for damping, thus a robust controller design method,
such as H, Fuzzy logic, adaptive (self-tuning) controls often required. Control design and tuning of
parameters are required to damp power oscillations.
The correct prediction of the stability of power system oscillations is very sensitive to the models of
the generators and their controls. Excitation system models accuracy is crucial to obtain a good small
signal stability indication.
In general, the controller parameters are designed using linear control approach, wherein the power
system is linearized at an operating point and the parameters are obtained through eigenvalue analysis.
Eigenvalue analysis gives the necessary information to:
Determine whether a particular operating point is sufficiently stable

11
Determine the cause of unstable oscillations

Design controls to extend the range of oscillatory stability
Since, the power system is non-linear, and its operating point keeps changing, the control parameters
designed at an operating point, may not give satisfactory performance at other points. For this purpose,
actual non-linear system must be considered, to study the performance at different operating points.
It is proposed to investigate the performance of these controllers in real-time. The proposed methodology
is that, the power system is modeled in MATLAB which residing in high speed computer. The control
technique is developed in micro-controller environment, which is interfaced with computer where power
system is modeled, thus forming the closed loop. The system must remain stable for different operating
conditions with the parameters obtained for the controllers. The performance is to be studied in closed
loop, under different disturbance conditions. The controllers must be robust so that its parameters need to
adapt itself with change in operating conditions.

Large power systems typically exhibit multiple dominant inter-area swing modes, which are associated
with the dynamics of power transfers and involve groups of machines oscillating relative to each other.
With the power industry moving toward deregulation, long distance power transfers are steadily
increasing, outpacing the addition of new transmission facilities and causing the inter-area modes to
become more lightly damped. Incidents of spontaneous low-frequency oscillations of mostly unknown
origins lasting for brief periods are now occurring in traditionally well-damped power networks. As a
result, many power network operators are taking steps to add supplementary damping devices to their
systems to improve system security reducing undesirable oscillations.
One of major challenges is to maintain system stability both angle stability and voltage stability. Some of
the means to improve the angle stability are the use of fast excitation system, Power System Stabilizers
(PSS), fast protective devices etc. Almost all the major generating plants have been provided with PSS.
However, these are not in operation due to improper tuning, which should also adapt to the change in
system operating conditions. Load frequency/automatic generation control is another aspect need to be
considered. This is important in maintaining the frequency of the system. Insufficient reactive power
compensation (fixed as well as variable) has been the root cause of major failures and blackouts in the
system. Most of the studies carried out in past do not include proper model of system components and thus
lead to inaccurate conclusions. Proper load modeling is specifically important in voltage stability studies.
Static contingencies can be taken care by planning adequate redundancies in a system. To meet the
challenges of dynamic conditions corresponding to change in demand/supply, large disturbance, behavior
of performance is important. To analyze such system either reduced order equivalent system may be
simulated or with the advent of power, total integrated system may be simulated to link into various types
of contingencies wither by stochastic or deterministic approach.
Large power systems exhibit a large range of dynamical characteristics, very slow to very fast, and various
controllers have been developed over time to control various phenomena. Many of the controls are on-off
switches (circuit breakers) that can isolate short-circuited or malfunctioning equipment, or shed load or
generation. Others are discrete controllers like tap-changers in transformers or switching of
12
capacitor/reactor banks. Still others are continuous control like voltage controllers and power system
stabilizers in rotating generators or the newer power electronic controls in FACTS devices.
However, all the controls (especially the fast ones) are local controls, that is, the input and the control
variables are in the same locale (substation). Most dynamic phenomena in the power system, on the other
hand, are regional or some times system-wide. Thus designers of power system control have been
constrained to handle system-wide stability problems with local controllers.
Need is felt to identify Power System Dynamic Performance studies, by adopting suitable controllers for
improving the system performance, as a major thrust area covering following aspects:
Design of Power System Stabilizer parameters: Small signal and transient stability studies considering
appropriate machine models and to study the effect of machine modeling on PSS parameters.
Identification of location and size of FACT controller to improve stability
Application of new control theory such as nonlinear, adaptive and artificial intelligence (fuzzy logic,
artificial neural networks, expert systems, H etc) based techniques in the design of controllers.
13
3. CORE PROPOSAL
1. Title of the Project

2. Duration
: 03 YEARS
2. Names of participating Organizations

CHAITHANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
4.
Objectives of the Proposal (precise and preferably quantified; use Bullet Form)
4.1
Overall Development Objectives

Development
of
proto-type
PSS
and
FACTS
controls
in
real-time

PSCAD etc.
laboratory. Simulation studies of this
laboratory model under steady state and dynamic conditions will be
compared with experimental results. This experience will greatly help the
utilities to integrate different FACTS models in the network.
stability
14
On-completion
of
the
project,
level

Controllers
models
Intermediate Objectives (corresponding to each milestone)
4.2

laboratory. Simulation studies of this laboratory model under steady state
and dynamic conditions will be compared with experimental results. This
experience will greatly help the utilities to integrate different FACTS
models in the network.

Identification of location and size of FACT controller to improve stability
5. Fulfillment of Technology Qualifiers Criteria:

Please tick if the proposal is
based on established R&D outcome/results

conforming to national / international specifications
potentially useful, demand driven and required by other agencies and users
a development of technology for multiple applications
an adaptation of existing technology for its applications other than originally
intended
meeting a critical national need ( present/ future ) and strengthening
15
technological capabilities for the same

an application of advanced science and technology with a promise of giving
competitive solutions
6. Critical Review of R, D&E Scenario (include references) identifying Gaps

6.1 National Status Review
6.2 International Status Review
7. Origin and Justification of the Proposal
(Please justify based on the identified Qualifiers criteria)
8. Summary Outline of the Project

(With Schematics, where possible; define the Problem and give technical details)
9. Expected Outcome in Physical Terms
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
New/ Upgraded Product

New/ Upscaled Process
New/ Upgraded System
Services (including Software)
Feasibility Analysis
Any other
10.
Targeted Specifications of the Expected Outcome
11.
Deliverables of the Project (precise and in bullet form)
12.
Methodology
(Please highlight how success in the project execution will be ensured)
As more FACTS devices are installed in a power system, their control functions must be carefully analyzed
due to the potential interactions between nearby FACTS devices. Using the multiple-input signal controller
structure, each FACTS controller can be assigned to damp the inter-area modes that it can affect the most, with
minimal impact on the other swing modes. Organizing such a decomposition of control activities can lead to a
hierarchical control scheme coordinating multiple FACTS devices to improve system security.
Damping control design using these special devices is often best achieved using more advanced methods than
are necessary for power system stabilizers. Power system stabilizers if designed correctly, are generally quite
robust to changes in system parameters and operating conditions. This is not always true of damping
controllers that use these special devices. Keeping this in view, there is a need to implement different control
strategies for damping, thus a robust controller design method, such as H , Fuzzy logic, adaptive (self-tuning)
controls often required. Control design and tuning of parameters are required to damp power oscillations.
The correct prediction of the stability of power system oscillations is very sensitive to the models of the
generators and their controls. Excitation system models accuracy is crucial to obtain a good small signal
stability indication.
16
In general, the controller parameters are designed using linear control approach, wherein the power system is
linearized at an operating point and the parameters are obtained through eigenvalue analysis.

Since, the power system is non-linear, and its operating point keeps changing, the control parameters designed
at an operating point, may not give satisfactory performance at other points. For this purpose, actual nonlinear system must be considered, to study the performance at different operating points.
It is proposed to investigate the performance of these controllers in real-time. The proposed methodology is
that, the power system is modeled in MATLAB which residing in high speed computer. The control technique
is developed in micro-controller environment, which is interfaced with computer where power system is
modeled, thus forming the closed loop. The system must remain stable for different operating conditions with
the parameters obtained for the controllers. The performance is to be studied in closed loop, under different
disturbance conditions. The controllers must be robust so that its parameters need to adapt itself with change
in operating conditions.
13. Milestones with Dates, Work Elements for each and the Organisation
responsible for each Work Element
S.
No.
Milestone
Target
Date
Work Elements
Responsible Organisation
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
14. Work Plan
(Provide a bar chart giving project activities and milestones. Highlight milestones)
15. Names of 5-6 Area Experts
(Please give complete postal address, telephone numbers and e-mail addresses)
16. Items for Outsourcing
S.
No.
Item
Justifications
Agency to which outsourced

First Year
Second Year
Third Year
17
17.
Any other
Execution
Information
relevant
to
the
Project
Proposal
and
4. BIO-DATA OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/

C0- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
1.
Name: Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM
2.
Gender:
3.
Date of Birth
: 07/31/1952
4.
Designation & Affiliation
:PROFESSOR,CBIT
Male
6.
Phone Numbers
: EEE Department,CBIT,GANDIPET
HYDERABAD-75
: +91-0948 345 7276
7.
E-mail ID
: Peribalu@gmail.com
8.
Qualifications (starting from University Level)
5.
Postal Address
Female
S.No.
9.
Institution
Year
Employment Experience
S.No.
10.
Degree
Position and Organisation
Nature of Job
List of Publications (for the last 5 years only)
18
Period
its
10.1 Journal Publications

10.2 Conference Presentations
11.
Patents filed/granted with details
12.
Books published /Chapters contributed
13.
Sponsored Research Projects
S.
No
14.
S. No
Title
Sponsoring Agency
Period
Amount
(Rupees
lakhs)
Achievements
in
Consultancy Projects
Title
Sponsoring Agency
Period
Amount
(Rupees
Lakhs)
15. Sponsored
approval.
S.
No
Title
Research/Consultancy
Agency to whom
submitted
19
Projects
in
submitted
Duration Date
of Amount
Submission (Rupees
Lakhs)
for
in
5. BUDGET ESTIMATES
1. Break-up of the Total Budget
(Amount in Rupees in Lakhs)
S.No Item
DST
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
7
1st Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
Total
Collaborator* DST Collaborator* DST Collaborator* DST Collaborator*
Manpower
Consumables
Contingency
Other Costs
(Outsourcing,
Fabrication,
Testing, Patents,
etc.)
Travel
Permanent
Equipment
Overhead
Charges
Total
Grand Total:
DST SHARE:
COLLABORATORS SHARE:
* Give Financial Contributions of each Collaborator separately.
20
2.
Itemised Budget
(Please provide justification)
2.1.
Manpower
Budget for Salaries (DST Component)

Designation
Qualification
Salary per
month
Number of Persons
Amount
Justification
(Rupees in Lakhs)
Budget for Salaries (Collaborators Component)

Designation
Qualification
Salary per
month
Number of Persons
Amount
(Rupees in Lakhs)
21
Justification
2.2. Consumables
Budget for Consumable Materials (DST Component)
1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
Total
rd
Justification including the basis

of cost estimates/quotations
Budget for Consumable Materials (Collaborators Component )

1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
Total
rd
22

of cost estimates/quotations
2.3. Contingencies
Budget for Contingencies
(DST Component)
1 Year
st
nd
Year
Budget for Contingencies
3 Year
Total
rd

of cost estimates
(Collaborators Component)
1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
Total
rd
23

of cost estimates
2.4. Other Costs (Outsourcing, Fabrication, Testing and Patenting, etc.)

Budget for Other Costs
(DST Component)
Item
1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
rd
Total
Justification including the basis of cost estimates/

quotations
Outsourcing
Fabrication
Testing
Patenting
Others
Budget for Other costs
(Collaborators Component)
Item
1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
rd
Total
Justification including the basis of cost estimates/

quotations
Outsourcing
Fabrication
Testing
Patenting
Others
24
2.5.
Domestic Travel*
Budget for Domestic Travel (DST Component)

1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
Total
rd
Justification;indicating
journeys,
mode
and
class
of
transport
(*) No foreign travel is permitted under DST grants. Class and mode of transportation should be as per the
entitlement of the concerned staff in the Organisation. Travel component of visits of the Project Review
Committee would be added by DST separately in the Project cost)
Budget for Domestic Travel (Collaborators Component)
1 Year
st
nd
Year
3 Year
Total
rd
25
J Justification; indicating
( journeys, mode and class of
t transport
2.6. Equipment*
Budget for Permanent Equipment (DST Component)
Description of Foreign/Indigenous
Equipment
Unit Landed Cost Number of Items

(CIF+Custom
Duty+ others )
Total
(Rupees in
Lakhs)
Justification
in
relation to Project
requirement
Budget for Permanent Equipment (Collaborators Component)

Description of Foreign/Indigenous Unit Landed Cost Number of Items
Equipment
(CIF+Custom
Duty+ others )
Total
(Rupees in
Lakhs)
Justification
in
relation to project requirement
* A List of equipment and facilities available to the investigators and relevant to the project be
provided separately.
26
6. UNDERTAKING FROM THE PRINCIPAL

INVESTIGATOR
Project Title:

1.
I have carefully read the terms and conditions of the Technology Systems
Development Programme and I agree to abide by them.
2.
I have not submitted this or a similar Project Proposal elsewhere for

financial support.
3.
I shall ensure that no item/equipment shown available in the Project

Proposal from my Organiaation, shall be purchased under the Project.
4.
I undertake that idle capacity of the permanent equipment procured under

the Project will be made available to other users.
5.
I have enclosed the following :

a. Endorsement from the Head of the Organisation (on letter head)
b. Endorsement from the Collaborating Industry/Agency
c. Project Proposal complete in all respect (15 hard copies and a soft copy)
Signature of Principal Investigator

(Name: Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM)
Date
Place
:
: Hyderabad
27
7. ENDORSEMENT FROM
HEAD OF ORGANISATION
(On the official letter-head)
Project Title:

1. Affirmed that the Organisation welcomes the participation of
Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM
as
the
PI
and
Dr/Mr/Msas the Co-PI for the Project and that in
the unforeseen and legitimate event of discontinuation by the PI,
the Co-PI will assume full responsibility for completion of the
Project. Information to this effect, endorsed by me, will be
promptly sent to DST
2. Affirmed that the equipment and basic as well as other
administrative facilities as per the terms and conditions of the
award of the Project, will be made available to the
Investigator(s) throughout the duration of the Project
3. The Organisation shall ensure that the financial and purchase
procedures are followed as per the prevailing norms of the
Organisation, within the allocated budget.
4. The Organisation shall provide timely the Statement of
Expenditure and the Utilisation Certificate of the Funds under
the Grant as required by DST in the prescribed format.
(Head of Organisation)
Seal/Stamp
Date
Place
:
:HYDERABAD
28
8. Endorsement from collaborating

Industry/ Agency
(On the official letter- head)
I have gone through the Project Proposal entitled Design and Development of
FACTS Controllers for Real Time Applications in Power Systems Submitted by
Dr.P.V.BALASUBRAHMANYAM of CHAITHANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE
OF TECHNOLOGY for DST funding and noted the Obligations and
responsibilities indicated in our name as stated below:
1. Contribution in financial terms (Rupees in Lakhs)
2. Contribution in kind (List activities)
I hereby affirm that my Organization/Industry is committed to participate

in the Project to the full extent as indicated in the Project Proposal including
the financial liabilities accruing there from as detailed above. A summary
profile of my Organization is given below:
Name of Organization
Nature of Business
Number of Employees
Annual Turnover
: Chaithanya Bharathi Institute of Technology

: Education
: 500 plus
:
The Annual Report for the preceding financial year is enclosed.
(Head of the Industry/Agency)

Seal/Stamp
Date
Place
29
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT (TSD ) PROGRAMME

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
These guidelines provide assistance for the preparation and submission of Project Proposals
for support under the Technology Systems Development (TSD) Programme of the Department of
Science and Technology (DST).
I
Introduction
Technology Systems Development (TSD) Programme supports activities aimed at

developing and integrating technologies to evolve technology systems both in the
advanced/emerging areas and in traditional sectors/areas. Under the Programme, feasibility of fresh
ideas/ concepts is assessed for their potential conversion into useful technology/product.
Applications of R&D for socio-economic benefits is consciously promoted under this programme.
II
Objectives
The primary objective of the Programme is to facilitate and support development of

products or techniques/technology aimed at specific end use. The Programme stresses on clearly
identifying the needs for development of the technology so that the developmental effort could be
useful to the target beneficiary. It envisages active user involvement and association in the
development effort. The intention is that the products/technologies developed under the
Programme become useful for the benefit of the people at large. The specific objectives of the
Programme are to
III
develop and integrate technologies following a holistic approach in identified areas;

promote application of modern/advanced technologies to socio-economic problem solving;
promote modernization of traditional technologies, tools and skills;
facilitate enhancing quality and performance of the traditional/non-traditional items;
encourage developments in application of R&D activities; and
promote activities aimed at improving technology, technique, material, methods and other
appropriate activities conducive for development of technology status in identified areas.
Technology Qualifiers Criteria
The Proposal to qualify consideration under the TSD Programme should meet one or more
of the following criteria. The technology should be
IV
based on established R&D outcome/ results

conforming to national/ international specifications
potentially useful, demand driven and required by other agencies and users
a development of technology for multiple applications
an adaptation of existing technology for its applications other than originally intended
meeting a critical national need ( present/ future ) and strengthening technological
capabilities for the same
an application of advanced science and technology with a promise of giving competitive
solutions
Spectrum of Activities Qualified for Support
30
Under the Programme, primarily those Projects/ Activities are supported for which proof
of concept has already been established. The Proposals aimed at applied R&D are encouraged.
Proposals involving basic/ exploratory research are not considered under this Programme.
Specifically, following activities are supported under the Programme:
Applied Research and Analysis

Development and Engineering (D&E)
Application oriented Research, Design and Development (RD&D) having Production
Potential
Prototype Development of Product/ System/ Services/ Software Development (new,
upgradation of the existing, field trials and demonstration)
Process Development (new, up-scaling of the existing, field trials and demonstration)
Data Generation and Feasibility Study
Provision for Production Facility on a limited scale for a specific Technology Segment to
enable the Technology to become competitive
Sophisticated Equipment and Technology based Job-Shops for cost-effective Fabrication
Techniques
Scientific Knowledge leading to future Technology Development
Technological Capability Development
Who can Submit ?
Project
Proposals
can
be
submitted
for
financial
support
by
scientists/engineers/technologists
working
in
academic
institutions/registered
societies/R&D institutions/laboratories having adequate infrastructure/facilities to carry out
technology development work. The Programme encourages multi-disciplinary Proposals
envisaging network/collaboration of various Organisations having diverse expertise and
facilities for synergistic implementation of the Projects. Participation of industry is
important.
Project Proposals are also welcome from Industry having DSIR recognized R&D
Laboratories either alone or in collaboration with academic/R&D Institutions.
VI
Niche Areas
Some of the typical areas in which Proposals can be submitted are listed below:
Glass and Ceramics Technology Up-gradation.

Molecular Electronics/Conducting Polymer and Biosensors.
Water Purification and Rural Micro-Water Management
Waste Utilization and Management
Public Health and Safety
Surface Engineering Techniques for Rejuvenation of Traditional Crafts.
Laser/ Plasmas/ Microwave Technology
Decentralized Energy Generation and Harvesting
Alternate Fuels, Fuel Conservation, Efficient Utilization of Fuels
ICT- driven Technologies
Innovative Civil Infrastructure Technologies
Platform Technologies for a Range of Applications
31
The above list is not exhaustive and Proposals in other areas are equally welcome if the
activity is perceived to be useful by DST for technology advancement in the country and is not
being taken up under any other major R&D programme of the Government of India.
VII
Forms of DST Grants
For Institutions: Project staff salaries, equipment, supplies and consumables, contingency
expenditure, patent filing charges, outsourcing charges, internal travel, fabrication costs, testing
charges, overheads, etc.
For Industry: Only cost of consumables upto 50%.
For Institution/Industry Joint Programmes: Support to the Industry upto 50% of the cost of
consumables.
The IPR will be under the purview of DST, Institution and Industry. If, however, the
Industry returns the amount received as grant from DST, the IPR, at the discretion of DST, shall be
appropriately assigned to the Institution and the Industry.
VIII
Mechanism of Evaluation, Implementation and Monitoring
The Technology Qualifiers Criteria and the Niche Areas requiring intervention are
identified by DST in consultation with Programme Advisory Committee (PAC). The Coordinators
identified by PAC are actively involved in mobilizing the Projects by identifying the required
capabilities and pooling the expertise of individuals and infrastructure of Organisations. The
Project Proposals are also received directly, which are screened with a view to assess their
suitability for consideration under the Programme mandate. After initial scrutiny, both directly
received as well as mobilized Proposals are peer reviewed by experts and the Investigators are
advised to revise the Proposal, if needed. The Proposals along with the Reviewers Comments are
placed before the Expert Advisory Committees (EAC) of the respective areas for their
recommendation. Principal Investigators are called for presentation before EAC, if required. The
recommended Proposals are processed for financial concurrence and administrative approval as per
DST procedure.
The Projects are periodically monitored usually at site by the Project Review Committees
(PRC) and/ or Group Monitoring Committees (at a common location at various stages of the
progress of Projects). Close association between PI and PRC is ensured to achieve the Project
Objectives. PI is advised to take necessary action on the recommendations of the Reviewers.
Project Completion Reports (PCR) are sent to experts for comments. A presentation is also
required to be made by PI on completion of the Project for final assessment and identification of
the future course of action on the Project.
IX
Submission of Proposals
(i)
The Project Proposals for consideration under the Programme can be submitted anytime
throughout the year.
The Investigators are required to submit 15 copies of the complete Proposal printed on both
sides of A4 size paper, with an electronic copy of the Proposal on a CD in MS Word.
The Proposal should be prepared and submitted strictly according to the formats prescribed
in this Document.
The duration of the Project should preferably be for a maximum period of 3 years. Projects
for development of integrated systems requiring development of various sub-assemblies at
multiple Organisations may be of longer duration. They should, however, be broken up in
different phases in such a way that there are clearly defined deliverables at the end of each
phase (of not greater than three years)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
32
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
Copies of the Proposal and other required documents must be sent in one lot through proper
channel to Shri Rajeev Sharma, Scientist-C and Member Secretary (Technology Systems
Development Programme), Department of Science & Technology, Technology Bhavan,
New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110016.
DST may be contacted if the acknowledgement letter intimating the registration number of
the Project is not received within one month from the date of dispatch of the Proposal.
It may be ensured that the registration number/ letter number (given by DST) and title of
the Proposal are quoted in all subsequent communications.
It is expected that PI will remain in the service of the Organisation throughout the duration
of the Project.
General Requirements
(i)
The coordinating Organisation implementing the Project is required to take all the financial
and administrative responsibilities for the Project.
(ii)
In case of a multi-organisational Project, PI has to obtain formal consent from the

collaborating organisations/scientists. Formal MoU/ Agreement may be worked out
detailing the obligations and arrangements stated in the Proposal and got approved by DST
subsequent to the sanctioning of the Project, before the funds are released by DST.
(iii)
International travel is not normally permissible under the Project.
(iv)
The Project personnel recruited for the Project are temporary and they should be paid
according to DST norms.
(v)
It is the policy of DST that the equipment procured under the Project be optimally utilized.
The Principal Investigator shall permit the use of any spare or idle capacity of the
equipment to legitimate users from the parent and other Organisations.
33
Department of Science & Technology

Technology Systems Development (TSD) Programme
Terms & Conditions of the Grant
1.
Approval of the Research Proposal and the grant released for it is for the specific Project
sanctioned and the released grant should be exclusively spent on the Project within the stipulated
period. The Institution may use funds obtained from any other Organisation with the concurrence
of DST, for the Project. Any un-spent balance out of the amount sanctioned must be
surrendered to the Government of India through a crossed Cheque/ Demand Draft drawn in
favour of Drawing & Disbursing Officer, DST.
2.
For permanent, semi-permanent Assets acquired solely or mainly out of the Project grant,
an audited record in the form of a register shall be maintained by the Organisation. The term
Assets include (a) the immovable property acquired out of the grant; and (b) movable property of
capital nature where the value exceeds Rs 1000/-. The Organisation is required to send to the
Department of Science & Technology a list of Assets acquired from the grant. The grant shall not
be utilized for construction of any building unless a specific provision is made for that purpose.
Full infrastructural facilities by way of accommodation, water, electricity, communication, etc. for
smooth implementation of the Project shall be provided by the Organisation.
3.
All the Assets acquired from the grant will be the property of the Government of India and
should not be disposed off or encumbered or utilized for purposes other than those for which the
grant had been sanctioned, without the prior sanction of DST.
4.
At the conclusion/ termination of the Project, the Government of India will be free to sell or
otherwise dispose off the Assets which are the property of the Government. The Organisation shall
render to the Government necessary facilities for arranging the sale of these Assets. The
Government of India has the discretion to gift the Assets to the Organisation or transfer them to
any other Organisation if it is considered appropriate.
5.
The Organisation / PI will furnish Six-Monthly Progress Report (5 copies) of the work on
the Project on half-yearly basis. The first half-year period shall be rounded off to the last date of
the sixth month. The subsequent periods of six months shall begin from the first day of the
following calendar month. In addition, DST may designate a Scientist/ Specialist or an Expert
Panel to visit the Organisation periodically to review the progress of the work being carried out and
to suggest suitable measures to ensure realisation of the objectives of the Project. During the
implementation of the Project, the Organisation will provide all facilities to the visiting scientist/
specialist or the Expert Panel by way of accommodation, etc. at the time of their visit. On
completion of the Project, ten copies of a self contained Project Completion Report as per the DST
format on the work done on the Project should be sent to DST.
6.
At the time of seeking further instalment of the grant, the Organisation / PI has to furnish
the following documents:
Utilisation Certificate (UC) and Statement of Expenditure (SE) for the previous financial year
(in original or copy if sent earlier);
a)
An authenticated Statement of Expenditure (SE) including committed Expenditure for the

Project until the previous month.
b)
34
7.
Request for specific approval of DST to carry forward the unutilised grant to the next
financial year for utilisation for the same Project, should be sent along with UC and SE, after
completion of the financial year.
8.
The Comptroller & Auditor General of India, at his discretion, shall have the right of
access to the books and accounts of the Organisation maintained in respect of the grant
received from the Government of India.
9.
The Organisation will maintain separate audited accounts for the Project. If it is found
expedient to keep a part or whole of the grant in a bank account earning interest, the interest thus
earned should be reported to DST and should be reflected in the Statement of Expenditure. The
interest thus earned will be treated as a credit to the Organisation to be adjusted towards further
instalment of the grant.
10.
The Organisation will not entrust the implementation of the work (except the out-sourced
part as approved) for which the grant has been sanctioned to any other Organisation nor will it
divert the grant receipts to any other Organisation as assistance. In case the Organisation is not in a
position to implement or complete the Project, it should, forthwith, refund to DST the entire grant
received by it or the balance grant remaining with it.
11.
All the personnel including Research personnel appointed under the Project, for the full/
part duration of the Project, are to be treated as temporary employees and will be governed by the
administrative rules/ service conditions (for leave, TA/DA, etc.) of the implementing Organisation.
They are not to be treated as employees of the Government of India and DST will have no liability,
whatsoever, for the project staff after the completion of the Project duration.
12.
For expeditious implementation of the research Project, PI will take the assistance of the
Organisation in the process of selection and appointment of staff and payment to them. Pay Scale
and emoluments for the posts not covered under DSTs OM are governed by the norms prevalent in
the implementing Organisation or as agreed upon in consultation with DST.
13.
DST reserves the right to terminate the Project at any stage if it is convinced that the
grant has not been properly utilised or satisfactory progress is not being made.
14.
The Project becomes operative with effect from the date on which the Draft/ Cheque
is received by the implementing Organisation. This date should be immediately intimated by the
Organisation authorities/ Principal Investigator to DST.
15.
If PI to whom a grant for a Project has been sanctioned wishes to leave the Organisation
where the Project is based, PI/ Organisation will inform DST of the same and in consultation with
DST, take steps to ensure successful completion of the Project, before PI is relieved.
16.
Investigators wishing to publish technical/ scientific papers based on the research work
done under the Project should acknowledge the support received from DST, indicating the
Programme. Investigators are expected to publish a few of their research papers emerging out of
the Project in leading Indian Journals.
17.
If the results of research are to be legally protected, the results should not be published
without securing legal protection for the research results. For Projects identified to have a distinct
potential for generating know-how, in the form of product/ process, that could be protected through
patenting, copyrights etc., PI should carefully follow the Guidelines/ Instructions for
Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights provided in the Guidelines for
Implementing Research Projects booklet issued by DST. For further information/ clarification on
this subject, Advisor-Patent Facilitating Cell, Department of Science & Technology, Technology
Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi - 110 016, (Phone- 011 26859581, Email:
raghav@nic.in) may be contacted.
35
REFEREES REPORT
Please tick in the boxes and enter your comments in the space provided.
Please be as objective as possible, as PAC relies substantially on referees
reports.
DST Reference No :
PROJECT TITLE :
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR :
36
1. Suitability under Technology Qualifiers Criteria (Tick one or more)

The Technology is
Based on established R&D outcome/ results.
Conforming to national / international specifications
Potentially useful, demand driven and required by other agencies and users (name them)
A development of technology for multiple applications
An adaptation of existing technology for its applications other than originally intended
Meeting a critical national need ( present/ future ) and/or strengthening technological capabilities for the same
An application of advanced science and technology with a promise of giving competitive solutions
Please tick one :

Suitable
Not Suitable
If considered `Suitable, indicate the Qualifiers criteria being satisfied by
ticking the appropriate box (es). If considered `Unsuitable, skip all other
items and directly go to item (9)
2. Objectives:
Please tick one :
Precise and well
formulated
Vague and lacking
precision/ focus
3. Work Plan including Methodology and Time Schedules:

Please tick one :
Well planned and
practical
Needs revision
37
Impractical
4. Opinion on Proposed Budget and Manpower :

4.1 Justification for Equipment in relation to the Project Objectives:
4.2 Spares and Consumables:
4.3 Travel :
4.4 Expenditure on other Items (Fabrication etc):
4.5 Total Budget :
4.6 Manpower requested :
5. Opinion on Professional Competence of PI and the Project Team

with regard to the Project under review:
PIs Publication Record in the related Area
a)
International Journals
a)
National Journals
b)
International Conferences/National Conferences
5.2
Patents
5.3
PIs Experience in the related Area(s)
5.4
General Opinion on Competence of PI, Co-PI and the Team
6.
Track Record and Commitment of the Industrial Collaborator, if

any. (Opinion may be given only on the basis of reliable information)
7.
Comments on Involvement of PI in other Projects (too many or

unrelated)
8.
General Comments on the Project Proposal as a whole
38
9. Rating of the Project

(Please tick one)
Excellent:
Very Good:
Good:
Fair:
Poor:
10. Recommendations
(Please tick one)
Recommended
Needs Revision
(Give Suggestions)
Not Recommended
(Give Critical View)
39
Signature
Name
Address
Phone(s)
Fax
Email
Date:
For official Use Only
Date on which the Proposal was sent to the Referee:
Date on which the Referees Report was received:
Technology Systems Development Programme

Six Monthly Project Progress Report
(Five Copies to be Submitted)
1. DST File No
2. Project Title
3. Date of Commencement
4. Approved Date of Completion
5. Principal Investigator
6. Progress Report Serial No
7. Reporting Period
8. List
of
Activities
as per the approved
the Organisation responsible for each Item.
Project indicating
9. List of Milestones as per the Approved Project indicating the

Organisation responsible for each Item.
10. Accomplishments in Terms of Activities for the Review
Period
40
Activity
Progress
Responsible
Organisation
11. Accomplishments in Terms of Milestones for the Review Period

Milestone
Progress
Responsible
Organisation
12. A brief Description of Technical/Scientific Achievements for

the Period (Give 200 word Summary in bullet form)
13. Shortfalls in Achievements of Activities for the Review Period
Activity
Shortfall (if any) in specific Responsible

Terms
Organisation
14.Journal Publications during the Review Period

Title of the Paper
Journal, Issue, etc.
Authors
15. Presentations in Symposia/Conferences during the Review Period

Title of the Paper Symposium
Presented
/Conference
Dates of the Authors

Symp/Conf.
41
16. Patents filed during the Review Period

16.1
16.2
16.3
16.4
Title
Inventors
Date of filing
Date of grant of patent
17. Other Achievements during the Period

(New Facilities created, HRD, Technology Demonstration, Social
Benefits, Notable Services rendered)
18. Any other Comment of Significance
19. Financial Status on the Day of Reporting

19.1
19.2
19.3
19.4
19.5
Amount Sanctioned:
Amount Received:
Balance Amount:
Manpower Sanctioned:
Manpower in Position:
20. Action taken on the Observations of the Project Review

Committee in its preceding Meeting
Observations
Action Taken
21. Status of Shortfalls as indicated in all the previous Reviews:
Signature of PI
Name of PI
Place:
42
Date :
(S.No of Review_____)
PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
PROJECT PROGRESS REVIEW
1. DST File No :
Period under Review:
2. Project Title :
Date of Review:
3. Principal Investigator:
4. Duration of the Project:
5. Progress of Approved Activities for the Review Period
Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
(Please comment)
6. Progress with Reference to Approved Milestones for the Review

Period
Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
(Please comment)
7. Methodology Adopted
Satisfactory
43
Needs Revision
(Please make suggestions)
8. Comments on the Achievements of the Team

8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
Technical and Scientific Achievements

Publications
Patents
Any other Achievement of Significance
( New Facilities created, HRD, Technology Demonstration, Social

Benefits, Notable Service rendered)
9. Effectiveness of Participation of Collaborating

Industry/Organisations
10. Comments on Financial Status
11. Overall Comments on the Progress of the Project
(Please tick one)
Satisfactory so far, timely successful completion of the

Project can be expected.
Satisfactory but behind Schedule. Successful completion is
possible only if
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
Extension is given
Objectives are modified
Additional Funds are provided
Project Team is strengthened
Please give suggestions

Not Satisfactory, Closure Recommended (Please elaborate).
Signatures and Names of PRC Members :

Place:
Date:
44
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

(10 Copies to be Sent Six Months Prior to the Date of Expiry of
the Project)
1
DST Reference No
Name of the Investigator
Title of the Project
:
:
Approved duration of the Project from ----------to---------------
Requested extension from ---------------------- -to-----------
Original objectives (quoted from project proposal)

a
b
c
Results achieved so far (in relation to attainment of objectives)
Clear statement of objectives that have not been achieved so far

but will be achieved during the extended period with Milestones.
9 Milestone of the extension period with bar-chart:

10
Financial implications:
A
B
C
Total Sanctioned Amount:

Total Expenditure upto last month:
Expected Expenditure during extended period:
C.1 Salaries (at the existing level)

Existing level means average of last 6 to12 months expenditure
C.2 Consumables (at the existing level)
C.3 Travel (if absolutely necessary)
C.4 Contingencies
D
Expected amount to be refunded to DST
OR
Expected amount in addition to sanctioned amount
Name & Signature of the PI
Date:
45
PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

(TSD) PROGRAMME OF DST
PROJECT TITLE
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
SUBMITTED BY
_________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Principal Investigator)
_________________________________________________
(Name and Address of the Organisation)
_____________
(Date of Submission
DST Reference No:

Project Duration: From..to..............
PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
46
Ten bound hard copies of the Project Completion Report and a soft copy on CD should be
submitted. The Report should consist of Part A- Summary Report and Part B- Comprehensive
Report. The Cover Page of the report should be on the Standard Format provided.
1. DST File No:
2. Project Title:
3. Duration of Project:
From _____________To____________
4. Principal Investigator
Name:
Organisation:
5. Co-Principal Investigator
Name:
Organisation:
6. Collaborating Organisations
Organisation
Team Members
Activities/Tasks assigned
Part A - Summary Report

1.
Project Objectives
Objective
Fully Achieved/Partially Achieved

47
Reason for Partial
as per the
approved Project
2.
(indicate shortfall)
Deliverables
Deliverables as per
the approved Project
3.
Achievement
Fully/Partially/Not
Achieved
Reason for Partial/ Non

Achievement
Specific Benefits/Outcome
(Please give details)
i)
ii)
iii)
Patent, if any
Product/Process developed/ technology transferred
List of Publications arising from the Project
iv)
v)
Linkages developed
Manpower trained (Give details)
(Indicate Impact Factors of the Journals; attach Copies of the Papers)
4.
Summary of significant S&T Achievements

(Provide in bullet form)
5.
Project Budget (Final)
6. Suggestions for Utilization of Project Outcome (Give tangible road map,

name specific Industrial Units)
Part B Comprehensive Report

(The Comprehensive Report should be precise in detail and self-contained)
1.
Project Title
2.
Product/Process as an outcome of the Project, identify Beneficiaries
48
3.
Scientific Description of the Product/Process, give Specifications/Standards for

the same
4.
Methodology adopted for Development of the Product/Process (State briefly in

300 words)
5.
Scientific /Technological Formulation giving underlying Basis (Provide

sufficient details)
6.
Further Work required, if any, to get full Benefits or enhance Utilization.
7.
Recommendations for Utilization of the Product/Process. Give Concrete Steps.
Signature of PI
Name of PI
Signature of Co-PI
Name of Co-PI
Names of Participating Organisations
49

TSD Facts

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

TSD Facts

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

PROJECT PROPOSAL

FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER

TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

Design and Development of FACTS Controllers

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

GANDIPET, HYDERABAD-75, PIN: 500075

FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL

Bio-Data of the Principal Investigator/ CoPrincipal Investigator

Undertaking from the Principal

Endorsement from Head Of the Organisation

Endorsement from Collaborating Industry/

Design and Development of FACTS Controllers

Principal Investigator (PI):

: EEE DEPARTMENT, CBIT, GANDIPET, HYDERABAD-75

: +91-0948 345 7276

Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI)

Names and Addresses of Collaborating Organizations

Name and Address of participating Industry (if any)

Duration of the Project

Budget for the Project

(Amount in Lakhs of Rupees)

Development of software for

Development of software for

Design, development and

Design, development and

Project Objectives (In bullet form)

environment using MATLAB and other Electrical simulation softwares like

Increased transmission system reliability and availability

Increased dynamic and transient grid stability

Increased quality of supply for sensitive industries

Decreased overall system transmission losses

workshop /seminar can be organized and trained the Power System

UG and PG students can also learn from hands on experience on the

Deliverables (In bullet form)

Names and Addresses of identified User Agencies

Names and Addresses of identified other Beneficiaries

List of Equipment with Cost

Design and Development of FACTS Controllers

5.1 DST Share

5.2 Collaborators Share

6. Objectives (In bullet form):

environment using MATLAB and other Electrical simulation softwares like

Design of Power System Stabilizer parameters: Small signal and transient

Increased transmission system reliability and availability

Increased dynamic and transient grid stability

Increased quality of supply for sensitive industries

Decreased overall system transmission losses

workshop /seminar can be organized and trained the Power System

On-completion of the project, International/National level conference will be organized for

10.2 Description of the proposal

Determine whether a particular operating point is sufficiently stable

Determine the cause of unstable oscillations

Determine whether a particular operating point is sufficiently stable

Design and Development of FACTS Controllers

2. Names of participating Organizations

Overall Development Objectives

environment using MATLAB and other Electrical simulation softwares like

Advantages of implementing PSS and FACTS controllers are:

Increased transmission system reliability and availability

Increased dynamic and transient grid stability

Increased quality of supply for sensitive industries

Decreased overall system transmission losses

workshop /seminar can be organized and trained the Power System