Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A comparative study
Unioncamere
Unione Italiana
delle Camere di Commercio Ministero dell’Industria,
Industria Artigianato Commercio e Artigianato
e Agricoltura
With the financial support of the European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General
Table of contents
Page
0. Executive summary 1
3. Summaries by country 12
3.1 Germany 13
3.2 Greece 18
3.3 Ireland 22
3.4 Italy 26
3.5 Sweden 32
1. Analysis of the Market of Support Services with the View of Improving its
Efficiency in the Context of the Working Group on the Visibility and Quality
of Support Services
2. Proposal for a classification of support services (excerpt from the Interim
Report to the Steering Group - Concerted Actions n. 2 & 3 – Brussels,
2.12.1999)
0. Executive summary
This report represents the final step of the “synthesis” phase of a pilot project 1 sponsored by the
European Commission within the framework of the Concerted Action Working Group on the
Visibility and Quality of Support Services aimed at identifying common methodologies for the
realisation of a better matching between demand and supply of quality services to SMEs.
Concerted Actions is based on a methodology where the Member States and the Commission
together identify and promote the exchange of best practice. It has looked at several different
areas, one of which is the visibility and quality of support services.
The report has the objective of summarising, interpreting and reconciling the findings, conclusions
and recommendations made in different research reports on the current status of the “market of
support services to SMEs”, produced by five European countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Italy, Sweden).
All the research studies described in these reports were conducted with different approaches and
methodologies (sample sizes, information collection methods, etc.), from very different market
and cultural perspectives, and obviously suggest relatively different conclusions and
recommendations that are all very meaningful within their respective contexts but can not be all
implemented in the same way on a European basis.
The recommendations presented here therefore represent a compromise and attempt to interpret
and reconcile the various views in order to identify some priorities and common guidelines for
action. They are classified in the following three major categories:
2. measures aimed at improving the ex post evaluation of the quality of the delivered services
3. measures aimed at improving the outcomes and results of the support service initiatives in
the follow-up phase.
It is also suggested that the implementation of most of these measures should be:
1
The project was one of the outcomes of the Concerted Actions 2 & 3 (“Measures aimed at supporting firms: the
creation and the assistance to new firms”, Madrid, 16-17.11.1995, and “Increasing the visibility and effectiveness
of real services to SMEs”, Dublin, 18-19.11.1996) and of an international conference on “Identification of
suppliers of quality services to SMEs” (Rome, 4-5.2.1988 – proceedings collected in the Unioncamere publication
“Collana Profili n. 59). As a result of this conference, a European Working Group was created c/o the European
Commission.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 1 of 49
In particular, it is suggested that one of the major prerequisites for the identification of priorities
agreed upon by all the interested countries and parties, and for the creation of the conditions for a
better service delivery, would be a systematic classification of services and segmentation of target
users, in order to assess the attractiveness and convenience of alternative ways of allocating
resources (especially, public funds) among segments.
1.1 Background
The preliminary phase of the project, conducted by five European countries (Germany, Greece,
Ireland, Italy, Sweden), consisted in the collection of data 2 and information about the current
status of the “market of support services to SMEs” in each country (the original reports
describing the various research surveys are made available separately 3).
The participating organisations were the following: Deutsche Ausgleichsbank (DtA) and
Deutscher Industrie und Handelstag for Germany, Eommex for Greece, Enterprise Ireland for
Ireland, Unioncamere for Italy, Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical
Development (NUTEK) for Sweden.
Based on the analysis and a preliminary interpretation of the country reports’ findings (derived
from data collected with different methodologies and according to different research criteria by
the various countries), combined with the interpretation of the most relevant research literature
on the subject and of previous reports and experiences, the report provides a series of tentative
conclusions and recommendations.
The characteristics and the expected contribution of this report can be evaluated from two major
perspectives:
• as a summary of other reports, and apart from our own weaknesses, this report inevitably
suffers some of the limitations of those reports, that we briefly summarise here:
• the findings contained in the reports are only related to the information collection
activities conducted for this specific project 4, and do not take into consideration a very
significant amount of other potential contributions to the issues of interest (in particular,
reports produced by the Commission in previous years, experts’ opinions, reports
produced by qualified research institutions and all the relevant academic and managerial
literature on services to SMEs)
• in order to compare the various reports’ findings (which was one of the major objectives
of our assignment) we had to significantly rely on our own judgement (that can obviously
be biased), since the reports were, in fact, not comparable (lack of homogeneity in terms
of structure, type and dimension of the samples of respondents, ways in which the
information was collected, manipulated, analysed and presented and, in particular,
measurement scales adopted – or not adopted); this was a result of the fact that although
2
The specifications for the phase of information collection are presented in Appendix 1.
3
These reports will also be accessible via the Enterprise DG’s website concerning Concerted Actions:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/entrepreneurship/concerted_actions/index.htm
4
Apart from one report, that mainly refers to a research project conducted before the beginning of our project.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 3 of 49
a common methodology was agreed by the working group, the studies in fact responded
to the different situations in the different countries and consequently developed different
approaches.
Overall, we believe that the experience and the process that originated this report were very
stimulating and fruitful, especially in view of future initiatives aimed at:
• providing SMEs and all the interested parties with effective and applicable solutions
• using in the most efficient way the resources made available by the Commission.
In this chapter we attempt a comparison among countries, with reference to each major issue
addressed in the reports. The limitations mentioned in the previous chapter (in particular, lack of
homogeneity in the various reports’ structure) suggested to limit our comments to a concise
description of the most evident aspects: each country’s picture will be covered in more detail in
the next chapter and, in any event, it would have been redundant to replicate the exhaustiveness of
the individual country reports, that are selectively accessible by all the interested parties.
It is clear that the countries of interest have their own economic background and context that
affects positively or negatively their performance in delivering services to SMEs.
While Germany has a consolidated economy and a leading position in the European consulting
industry, the young economy of Ireland is relatively more open, dynamic and subject, to some
extent, to the other economies’fluctuations.
Another case is Greece that, after having experienced a difficult economic period, has
undoubtedly improved its position in the European context; other peculiar characteristics of its
context are the high concentration of the most important industry sectors in the Athens and
Thessaloniki area and a shortage of specialisation in information technologies.
Italy, Germany and Sweden have quite stable economies, significantly developed in the service
area. In particular, Sweden has a well organised public sector, that parallels equally dynamic
private initiatives.
The overall picture that emerges from all the reports shows a significant growth of the services
sector, both in terms of number of new companies and in terms of new jobs: statistics from some
reports (i.e. Germany, Ireland and Italy) confirm that revenues and turnover have been
increasing over the last four years.
Support services were considered both from the point of view of the supply of services and the
perception by the users (demand).
A relatively common demand characteristic that emerges from all the reports is a lack of
managerial attitudes and skills, normally balanced by a strong entrepreneurial drive that, however,
needs to be supported, especially during the start-up phases (public agencies, especially in Sweden
and Germany often perform this “tutoring” role).
The most common “conscious” reason why firms ask for help is a lack of specific know-how in
the different areas of management but, on the other side, firms are quite sensitive to the price of
services: the ratio price/quality is perceived to be too high in most countries (notably in Greece,
Ireland and Italy).
This is probably due, to some extent, to the fact that the value of services is not adequately
perceived in these countries, while in Germany and Sweden firms tend to appreciate this value
more easily.
An underlying cause of the inability to appreciate the value of services could be represented by a
poor visibility of the service providers: SMEs often face difficulties in the identification of
suppliers that can satisfy their needs, both in terms of skills and in terms of willingness to provide
the services in the required way: this finding is particularly evident in the Irish and Greek reports.
More frequently, in all the interested countries, the interaction between SMEs and providers is
triggered by traditional (but very effective) factors such as word-of-mouth. On the contrary, other
communication tools like traditional advertising and Internet have a marginal impact (in some
countries like Italy, this could also depend on the fact that professional organisations in most
sectors are not allowed to advertise themselves).
Another obstacle to a mutually beneficial interaction between SMEs and service providers is
represented by the fact that firms do not have any assurance about the characteristics and quality
of services, nor they can use relatively objective criteria for assessing them: this aspect is
mentioned in all the reports, except for the Swedish one.
In the figure on the following page we tried to summarise and compare the information and data
contained in the various reports, with specific reference to the type of services required by the
potential users 5.
The information about this figure is based on questions that vary slightly from country to country.
On a common ground, the questions are:
• What are the services needed by your enterprise?
• How often do you use these services?
The services most in demand are those related to the financial, accounting and legal sectors, that
are perceived as (and normally are) vital for the firms, and often are compulsory 6.
It is relatively strange to see that “training and education” services 7 are not very popular, taking
into account the fact that firms claim that the lack of specific know-how is one of the main
reasons why they ask for assistance.
It is more difficult to interpret the “performance” of other services. Obviously, the choice of
services depends both on the firms’ characteristics and the economic context in the different
countries (including suppliers’ structure), but taking into account the lack of homogeneity in the
collection, manipulation and presentation of the original data, any interpretation from our part of
the reasons why some services are more or less in demand would be very arbitrary.
We therefore leave this task to the originators of the data, who know their country situation much
better than us, and we limit our contribution, as far as this aspect is concerned 8, to a simple
description of the histograms 9:
• in Germany there is a significant demand for most services, with the exception of training and
export assistance
• in Greece, the demand seems to be particularly relevant for marketing/sales and financial/legal
services
• in Ireland, the demand seems to be, overall, relatively smaller, except for technical services
and export assistance (in addition to financial and legal services, which are very popular
everywhere)
5
As already mentioned, the information presented in the reports was not very homogeneous, also in terms of
statistical reliability (please see, for example, the very small sample of firms surveyed in Ireland). We therefore had
to compromise from various standpoints, in order to make data comparable: classification of services (number and
type of aggregations), adopted scales and scores assigned to the various countries on the various service categories.
In some reports some data were missing, and therefore could not be considered: this does not mean that the related
services were not requested or offered.
6
Please refer also to the classification we had suggested in the interim report of 2 December 1999, that however
could not be adopted in this summary.
7
Please refer also to the proposed classification presented in Annex 2.
8
Our comments and interpretations will be mainly included in the 4th chapter.
9
We do not comment the “other” category, since it includes various types of services.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 7 of 49
Fig. 2.1 – Most (and least) required services
6
7:most required
4
1: least required -
Germany
3 Greece
Ireland
2 Italy
Sweden
1
0 rt
er
l
ing
les
ga
ing
al
g
po
ion
ial
th
tin
nic
Sa
Le
dit
Ex
ain
nc
O
ke
at
ch
Au
na
m
Tr
ar
Te
or
M
Fi
Inf
• in Italy and Sweden firms seem to require similar services, except for sales (higher demand in
Italy) and export assistance (higher in Sweden).
Overall, the reports point out that a better specialisation, accessibility, reliability and efficiency of
suppliers would probably facilitate a higher demand growth.
2.4 Suppliers’characteristics
The role played by the public and semi-public sector versus the private one is variable depending
on the country considered.
Sweden seems to be the best organised country from this perspective, with a quite wide range of
support services provided at both national and regional levels. In Ireland the public agencies play
a crucial role in assisting firms in the various stages of their development.
Other countries like Germany and Italy have more diversified public structures, probably due to
the relevant complexity and limited homogeneity of their economic systems (please refer also to
the next chapter): overall, the public sector has the advantage of a more homogeneous geographic
distribution of services than the private one. In Greece, as mentioned above, the highest
concentration of support service provided by the private sector is in the Athens area. In Italy, in
Milan and Turin area.
Different strategies are used by firms, agencies and/or institutions to make themselves visible.
Generally speaking, the public sector has more institutional communication channels with their
potential and actual customers, the use of Internet is nearly absent or marginal, with the exception
of some cases (again Sweden).
Private suppliers use more personal and traditional methods for stimulating the demand: seminars,
exhibitions, direct marketing, etc.
The respondents to the questionnaires in the five countries complained about the lack of personal
contacts both in the start-up and in the follow-up phases of their development.
As far as the important issue of EU quality standards is concerned, the reports present divergent
opinions. In Ireland, Greece and Germany respondents believe that a precise and measurable
standard in service delivery would benefit suppliers in terms of visibility and better perceived
value.
In other countries like Sweden and Italy, quality standards are not considered strategically
important for the creation and stimulation of the demand.
The German report suggests that standards should be set and managed by the interested
categories (within their industry sectors), following some general guidelines established at EU
level.
In any event, in nearly all countries it seems that there are self regulated codes that guarantee the
ethics and professionalism of the persons or companies that carry out the services, and sometimes
also minimum standard of quality (which, however, are not precisely defined in the reports).
The willingness to help and assist new SMEs, especially in their start-up phase, is mentioned in all
the reports: clearly, as said above, these initiatives are especially carried out by public entities.
As far as the visibility and promotion of suppliers are concerned, Eommex in Greece and
Unioncamere in Italy seem particularly active:
• Eommex created a co-operation network between the public and private sectors, and hosts
suppliers on its web site, in order to facilitate their visibility and accessibility
In Germany, in addition to the national programs that support and assist the youngest firms, the
DtA/DIHT (Deutscher Industrie und Handelstag) sponsorship model seems to be particularly
innovative: it is a sort of “voluntary organisation” of tutors or coaches to new firms that want to
improve their competitive position (the organisation is made of professional consultants who are
available to freely help SMEs that require their assistance).
In particular, Enterprise Ireland is a new development agency with the specific purpose of
providing a “one-stop-shop-service” addressed to some key managerial functions of the assisted
firms: strategic planning, manufacturing processes and marketing.
Sweden is among the countries with the highest ratio of per-capita investments in technology, and
is planning the realisation of new programs in this area.
The country aims at reducing the importance of public intervention in the service sector and
promotes the development of clearly defined professional services (including the specification of
the time needed to perform the services), in order to optimise the use of firms’resources.
Even though each country differs from the others in terms of socio-economic and political
context, all the reports seem to share the opinion that the development of the service sector
deserves a rational and systematic attention 10.
The major issues discussed under this chapter are the following (please see more details in the
following chapters):
The German report suggests the creation of a “forum” on a EU scale, with the purpose of
conducting research projects on the current and projected market situations. It also suggests the
creation of a Commission of experts who would have the task of discussing and addressing, at the
EU level, new economic policies and market strategies. Furthermore, Germany proposes to make
available to the other partners its experience and the efficiency of some of its agencies (such as the
“voluntary assistance” to firms).
The Greek report emphasises the importance of improving the visibility and the quality of services
(and therefore, of the skills and competencies of service providers), in order to improve the
competitiveness of the SMEs system. It suggests the definition of quality standards that could
contribute to a more homogeneous market structure.
The Italian report suggests the creation of a communication network among EU countries in
order to make the service sector more “European”11. It also points out the need for a better
national organisation of this sector, that would also address a better homogeneity of the
territorial presence of suppliers, in order to make services more accessible to the SMEs.
Finally, the “forum” project is also sponsored by the Swedish report, that also promotes a better
sharing of know-how among the various economic actors in the different countries: it would be
useful to launch a research project sponsored by the EU, specifically addressed to a better
exploitation of information technologies (and, particularly, of the new media) for improving the
sector’s performance and competitiveness.
10
As a matter of fact, this opinion reinforces our conviction that research programs in this area should also be
conducted according to systematic and homogeneous methodological approaches.
11
Some experiences already exist in this area: please see, in particular, the Netprise project, designed and managed
by an Italian consulting firm and sponsored by several Italian and German Chambers of Commerce (we are adding
this piece of information, not contained in the Italian report).
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 11 of 49
3. Summaries by country
In this chapter we present a detailed summary of the information contained in the various reports,
arranged by country and, within each country, by subject.
The classification of subjects corresponds only in part to the reports’ structure 12 and the
information is presented in tables, in order to facilitate comparisons and an overview of each
report in few pages 13.
12
For analytical purposes we found useful to classify the information, both for the supply and the demand, in the
following categories (often used for designing and interpreting research frameworks – including questionnaires):
structure, behaviour and dynamics, performances (for the supply) and degree of satisfaction (for the demand).
13
However, especially in this chapter, we tried to be as objective as possible in summarising the comments and
conclusions of the five reports, limiting our own comments only to some cases in which the reports’ findings could
sound contradictory: also the language and the style reflect this choice, and therefore could seem, in some
instances, rather inconsistent with those adopted in the other chapters.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 12 of 49
3.1 Germany
Germany: Supply side
Structure
Kind of Type of • The industry of management consulting is extremely
suppliers and providers 14 heterogeneous in terms of structure and size of firms. Apart
services from the independent consultants, there are medium-size
supplied consulting firms as well as large consulting companies.
• The structure of the consulting industry is characterised by a
large number of young enterprises
Characteristi Public and private sectors are both effective and organised.
c of the The private sector has a leading position in Europe for commercial
market management consulting.
(public/priv.) The public sector consists of:
14
Individual consultants, small firms, etc. providing a single or few kinds of services vs. a huge range of different
services.
15
Grants and/or other incentives, included special agencies set up for that purpose.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 13 of 49
Germany: Supply side (continued - 2)
Behaviour and
dynamics
Methods • means of direct communication such as recommendations,
used by references, personal contacts, seminars, etc. are used rather
suppliers to regularly
make • means such as presentations on the internet and expert
themselves conferences, direct mailing, etc. are used rather sporadically
visible • more generic means of advertising (newspapers, phone books,
etc.) are practically never used
These choices reflect what consultants think about the effectiveness
of each way of communicating.
The survey shows that consultants seldom advertise individual
services in particular.
Relationships • The majority of consulting firms surveyed delivers services
and co- both on call of their customers and based on appointments
operation clearly contractually set ex ante
between the • Usually the location of service delivery is the business location
parts of the enterprise seeking advice
Transparenc • Most consultants stick to the common practices in the
y (price… ) consulting industry. About one third of the firms surveyed
arranges prices depending on individual preferences.
• Most consultants deliver the service personally (the support of
other parties is often seen by customers as a probable increase
of costs)
Need for EU • It is a largely shared opinion that precise and measurable
standards quality standards would lead to an expansion of the demand
for consulting services.
• The majority of suppliers (53.8 %) of management consulting
services thinks that introducing minimal standards of quality
on a European level is a reasonable approach, particularly in
the areas of advising and training.
• the suppliers consider trademarks and quality standards as the
most effective means toward a better information about the
quality of consulting services.
Performances
Main It is almost impossible for providers to make the value of services
problems visible to potential customers before its concrete delivery.
Visibility Although the situation is not dramatic, the visibility of providers
seems to be one of the main problems (firms point out difficulties
in finding a suitable provider for the service they are asking for)
Ability to • Some customers complain about a mismatch between the
meet service they would have needed and had asked for and the one
customers’ they got.
requirements • Suppliers emphasize the importance of professionalism in
their dealings with customers and maintaining flexibility when
changes in the tasks performed become necessary during
service delivery.
• Overall performance is generally judged as somewhere
between good and satisfactory
Presence of With reference to quality standards, the sample considered shows
self regulated that almost 60% of consulting firms use criteria developed only for
code of ethic their own firms. Half of the consulting firms complies with the
or standards norms customary in the industry. ISO 9000 has a very low
importance, relatively speaking. An important issue is the
membership in the BDU. Please refer to par. 4.1.2.1 of the German
report.
16
E.g., do they find the range of services they want?
17
Is the service valuable? Does the service meet the real requirements of the firm?
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 16 of 49
Germany: Recommendations
Best • Voluntary control by means of membership in professional
practices associations
• Federal Association of German Management Consultants
(BDU)
• Federal Association of Management Consultants (BVW)
The two associations above guarantee the qualification of
consultants in terms of experience, reliability, credits, etc.
• Certification according to ISO 9000 ff
• The DtA consulting agency: arranges contacts between SMEs
and competent and experienced consultants on a nation-wide
scale. The quality is ensured by means of two measures:
• the control ex-ante of the qualification of the provider
• the control over the process of consulting
Proposals • Only market solutions will be feasible
• Further research is necessary to define which are the best
instruments for quality control
• Action plan in three points:
1. Diffusing information: Create a forum for all member
states of the EU, in which the current situation of the
market for consulting services can be analyzed. In order
to generate a uniform starting situation, the results of this
analysis should ideally be widely publicized and
discussed in the EU.
2. Defining policies: In the steering committee of the
Concerted Actions, examine the possibility of appointing
an expert-group on the EU-level for the purpose of
discussing the implementation of market-oriented
solutions.
3. Diffusing best practices: some of the best practices of
each state could be extended to other member states of
the EU. The diffusion of “best practices” throughout the
EU should be supported in this way.
Actions • Several public financed support programmes both at Federal
and Bundesland level with:
• clearly defined goals
• focused recipients (target)
• clearly identified providers.
Ireland: Recommendations
Best It is recommended that a forum of EU members should be
practices established in order to assess the feasibility and implications of
introducing a European Quality Standard for Service Providers.
Proposals • Since the main findings of this report are the difficulty in the
“definition of the quality required in the provision of
services”, the “identification of the suitable service providers”
and “the “professionalism of the service provider in
communicating with the customer” (SMEs say that they would
increase their use of consultants if they could be assured of the
benefits), the report suggests the need for a pre-set definition
of quality measures, together with a pre-defined pricing
system.
• The results of the study should be disseminated through the
Enterprise Ireland (Technology Ireland) publication, in order
to increase the awareness of the findings.
Actions In particular, the results of the findings should be made available
to the ‘Development Agencies’ e.g. Enterprise Ireland, IDA,
Shannon Development, Udaras Na Gaeltachta, also in order to
define the Irish position in the development of a pan European
Initiative on Quality Standards.
The European market of support services to SMEs is quite heterogeneous, in terms of both
dimensions and characteristics, in the five nations investigated by the research studies.
However, one important common trend seems to emerge: the market is significantly growing,
both in quantitative and qualitative terms:
• quantitatively, the number, frequency and variety of the activities outsourced by firms are
increasing
• qualitatively, it is more and more frequent, especially in the most industrially developed
countries, the outsourcing of potentially high value added services.
Relatively speaking, the rate of growth is obviously higher in the countries in which the market is
currently less developed.
The economic developments of the last decade (in particular, the increasing globalisation),
combined with the characteristics of a manufacturing sector largely based on SMEs, seem to be
one of the main reasons of this growth.
• lack of (financial and managerial) resources and significant difficulties in obtaining them
• a way of doing business that is much more entrepreneurial than managerial
• in particular, a strategic vision that does not go beyond the short-medium term
• on the other side, an extraordinary ability of seizing opportunities
• and, more recently, the willingness to create and/or being part of networks and alliances in
order to better face the increasing need for critical mass in the global markets,
the growth of support services seems to be one of the best ways of overcoming the current
weaknesses and facilitating the creation and consolidation of networks.
18
These notes are almost exclusively based on the findings presented in the research reports provided by the 5
member States and only take in minimal consideration other research sources such as the “classical” studies on
service and service quality (Normann, The strategic management of services; Zeithaml, Parasuraman & Berry,
Delivering quality service, etc.). However, contrary to the approach adopted in the previous two chapters, here we
try to provide also our own integrated view from an overall perspective.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 37 of 49
4.2 Why do SMEs need services
The identification of the “actual” reasons why firms look for external help is obviously important:
the comparison between the typical and actual situations in which firms look for external help and
the reasons mentioned by the owners and managers of the same firms when interviewed, can
allow a better estimate of the extent to which firms are aware of their needs.
We see that situations that would command a significant planning activity (especially in order to
reduce uncertainties) are frequently addressed as emergencies.
Furthermore, we see that the lack of consistency between “expected” and “delivered” service is
one of the most frequent problems in all the interested countries, and we can reasonably assume
that the gap is largely attributable to a lack of needs’awareness.
Understanding the typical situations in which firms use external providers of service allows a
better identification of:
The basic reasons why firms need and/or ask for external support are roughly the same across
countries 19:
It seems worth noting that the first two reasons (the most frequently mentioned by firms) identify
situations in which it is “necessary” to look for external help, frequently due to contingencies,
emergencies and unexpected events.
The other three reasons (the least frequently mentioned), on the contrary, can only be identified as
a result of a systematic planning activity.
The fact that the first two reasons are much more frequently mentioned than the others could
seem strange (emergencies and unexpected events should represent the exception, not the rule),
but this is a significant symptom of the SMEs scarce willingness and ability to plan.
Some of the reports identify “moments” in which the external help is mostly sought:
19
Evidently, we are not considering here the supporting activities which are compulsory by law.
20
Either because they do not exist at all, or because they are not currently available.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 38 of 49
• the start-up phase
• the initial approaches to exporting and internationalisation
• during technological transitions
• more in general, all the situations in which the rate of change and the degree of uncertainty
are high and require significant investments.
For the purpose of summarising the research findings we can split the process of providing a
service into at least three distinct major phases (and related sub-phases):
1. from the initial awareness of the need for service to the awarding of the assignment to the
external provider
2. delivery of service
3. evaluation of the delivered service.
• Need identification: even though the lack of adequate need identification does not explicitly
emerge from all the research reports, we believe that the absence of this important
prerequisite of a successful service delivery is one of the most critical aspects in the European
SMEs behaviour: a precise need identification directly affects the choice of the appropriate
supplier, the definition of the specific kind of service required, the assessment of the
consistency between the service required and the service actually delivered, the evaluation of
the service value, etc. It also seems obvious that an adequate planning activity is the major
prerequisite of an appropriate need identification.
• Choice of outsourcing the services: the research reports seem to agree that the decision of
outsourcing the services looks much more like a constraint or an obligation than an actual
choice.
• Search of a provider: this is the activity in which the SMEs of all the investigated countries
(except, to a significant extent, Sweden), without significant differences in relation to the
degree of market development, seem to consciously face the major problems, due to the
following major causes:
• Costs: firms often complain that the costs actually incurred are higher than those initially
agreed upon
• Timeliness: delivery deadlines are frequently unmet
• Co-operation and integration: the degree of co-operation and integration between firms and
consultants is not perceived as problematic, but is considered important for a successful
completion of the assignments.
From the various research reports an inverse relationship between the importance of the above
mentioned problems and the degree of market development is evident.
22
As far as the evaluation of the delivered services is concerned, the reports highlight some
contradictory findings:
• from one side, and quite surprisingly 23, most service users (firms which have actually used
the services) express a relatively high degree of satisfaction
• from the other side, it is quite frequent to find a significant asymmetry between the type and
quality of the delivered service and the actual needs of the firms.
Therefore, it seems quite important to analyse the major dimensions of “quality” normally
perceived by firms.
The reports agree that SMEs adopt the following major criteria for assessing the quality of
services:
21
Again, this ratio is superficially perceived as “not measurable”, but it could be, most often, just “not measured”,
due to the total absence of an adequate analysis and planning activity.
22
With the partial exception of the Greek one.
23
Considering all the problems mentioned by firms.
24
If the gap between the needs and the delivered service (4th criterion) is perceived as different from the gap
between the requested and the delivered service (1st criterion) it could mean that firms do not know exactly which
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 40 of 49
The first three criteria seem to be related to the technical contents of the services and the
contractual agreements between users and suppliers: especially the 2nd and the 3rd look more like
indicators of suppliers’ reliability than indicators of service performance. The last criterion, on the
contrary, seems to refer more directly to the actual “value added” provided by the service.
A possible key for interpreting the apparent contradiction between the relatively high degree of
satisfaction and the problems encountered could be the “nature” of the services:
there are services for which the relative importance of the technical and contractual aspects is
lower compared to the importance of other parameters such as the ability to address the real
needs and to identify opportunities, the degree of co-operation, etc.
Another interesting key could be the “time” (or “process”) perspective, that is, the moment in
which the quality of service is assessed (this key parallels the framework suggested above):
1. before the assignment: quality is mainly related to the information and communication
dimensions (could we call it “contact quality”?)
2. during the assignment (i.e. the delivery of service): degree of co-operation25 (“relationship
quality”?)
All the reports agree that firms complain about a low level of quality in the first period (before the
assignment) 27 and this could contribute to the explanation of the above mentioned contradiction
(the degree of development of the market does not make any difference from this point of view):
SMEs find “searching” particularly difficult, and tend to award the assignments only when they
reasonably feel that the supplier is sufficiently reliable and able to deliver results: in fact, the
degree of satisfaction is relatively high only with firms that have experienced the entire service
delivery process (the degree of satisfaction cannot obviously be measured with firms which did
not experience the service because they could not find an adequate provider).
In any event, we believe that the initiatives aimed at improving the quality should be selectively
focused on the above mentioned facets, which address significantly different issues and problems.
We could “measure” the visibility of a given service provider in terms of percentage of firms, in
his/her market, that:
kind of service they should request (again, lack of planning) and they only perceive the discrepancies ex post. As
far as we know, even the famous “gurus” on service do not make this important distinction: the Parasuraman’s
model assumes that the “expected” service is affected by needs, word-of-mouth and past experience, but does not
distinguish between actual and perceived need, nor between “expected” and “requested” service.
25
Includes: way of interacting, discretion, professionalism, timeliness, accuracy, quality of information provided
(depending on the kind of service), etc.
26
Here also the actual meaning of “output” is very variable, depending on the type of service.
27
This is understandable, if we consider the nature of “experiential goods” of the support services: however, we
should not forget the problems of visibility and transparency, which will be further addressed below.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 41 of 49
• know about his/her existence
• know the type of services that he/she is able to supply.
We would have perfect visibility if all the firms knew all the potential providers for any kind of
services and, obviously, the degree of visibility is inversely correlated to the difficulties
encountered by firms in finding suppliers.
The lack of visibility of service providers is one of the most common characteristics of the five
countries (except, perhaps, for Sweden).
This problem is even more significant if we consider that some of the interested markets
“function” very well from many points of view: i.e. the problem of visibility seems relatively
unrelated to the market dimension and its degree of development.
The provider selection process is mainly based on word-of-mouth, references and direct contacts,
due to the difficulty of a preliminary and systematic evaluation of the supplier’s quality
(established assessment criteria do not exist).
More than a weakness to overcome, this fact should be taken into consideration for the
identification of measures that could improve the visibility.
On the other hand, we already observed that firms ask for help especially to face emergencies and
unexpected events: this suggests that the same firms are not very alert and sensitive to the
providers’marketing initiatives 28.
Again, the lack of an adequate planning activity seems to be one of the major underlying causes
of the problems encountered in this market.
From one side, the high fragmentation of supply (found in most countries, at least in the private
sector) is by itself a major obstacle to visibility, from the other side the small service providers do
28
All the reports confirm that firms react only rarely to the communication activities undertaken by the suppliers:
they actively search a supplier only when they suddenly feel the urgency of receiving some help.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 42 of 49
not normally perform any systematic promotional activity, except for some direct contacts
supported by previous clients’references29.
When promotional activities are undertaken, they are often rather inadequate.
Even in the most developed and competitive markets, firms lack sufficient information about
suppliers and seem to welcome all the initiatives aimed at addressing the problem (obviously
when, as suggested in the note above, they suddenly feel the urgency of being helped).
All the initiatives aimed at improving the visibility therefore seem to be very promising at least
in terms of potential improvement of the market efficiency (less efforts from the firms’side, other
things equal), if not in terms of effectiveness (better results).
In fact, three dimensions of visibility that could affect the quality of services emerge from the
reports:
an improvement in visibility directly affects both the number of choices available to firms and
the possibility of actually accessing the services.
Ex-post (i.e. after the completion of the service delivery process), transparency can be
defined as the degree of correspondence between the “promised” service and the service
actually delivered, both in quantitative (costs and timing) and in qualitative (kind of activities
performed) terms 30.
Ex ante (i.e. before the delivery process), transparency means the possibility, for the
customer, of knowing the scheduling of the planned activities, who is going to perform the
activities, the related costs, etc., and therefore is an important factor which directly affects the
ability of evaluating and controlling the entire delivery process and the supplier’s
performance.
We could also assume that an improvement in visibility would create a more competitive
environment and that transparency would become an important key success factor.
It is evident that there is a direct relationship between product (and service) quality and
market competitiveness: more visibility would mean less opportunities, for the “bad
suppliers”, of hiding themselves!.
In any event, since firms consider accessibility and transparency as important supplier
selection factors, the visibility directly becomes a major component of the service perceived
value 31.
29
This finding is consistent with that about the choice criteria adopted by firms in selecting a supplier.
30
We see that transparency does not necessarily imply effectiveness (obtained results).
31
We already mentioned that firms complain about the lack of adequate information: all the factors that can
improve the information quality immediately add value to the service.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 43 of 49
4.6 The role of public vs. private providers
In the figure on the following page we tried to compare in a synoptic table the relative roles of
public and private organisations in providing support services: significant differences among
countries are evident (please see details in chapter 3) 32.
32
The recurring and inevitable problem with this type of summaries (which, on the other side, have the advantage
of conciseness, compactness and immediateness of comparisons) is that the information contained in the various
reports is presented in different formats and with different approaches: the classifications that we are suggesting
(both for the categories of services and for the scale adopted in assessing the relevance of public bodies’ role) is
therefore to a large extent arbitrary and represents our interpretation of the data (this is the reason why we did not
include this synoptic table in chapter 2).
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 44 of 49
Fig. 4.1: relative role of public versus private bodies in the five Countries, depending on
type of service provided
management
information technologies
technological, industrial n.a. n.a.
management education & training
operational facilities & equipment
support
promotions, missions
financing
We propose to classify the recommendations contained in the reports, or emerging from the
comparisons of the reports findings (please refer also to chapter 3) and integrated by the
interpretations outlined above, from the “process” perspective already adopted:
• measures aimed at improving the pre-conditions for a better development of the market
(before the delivery of services):
1. creation and diffusion of a better managerial culture among SMEs in order to improve
their ability to identify and define their actual needs, through various initiatives, aimed at
developing favourable attitudes (through PR campaigns, seminars, etc.) but also
knowledge and skills (information, management education on strategic planning, etc.)
2. development of tools that could facilitate a more systematic and precise identification of
the same needs at competitive costs (such as strategic and organisational semi-
automated check-up systems delivered by certified junior consultants)
6. financial aids to assist firms that qualify on the basis of specific characteristics 33
• measures aimed at improving the ex post evaluation of the quality of the delivered services, in
order to facilitate the identification of the best providers and continuously improve
transparency and qualified visibility:
10. design of incentives that could facilitate the participation of SMEs in the collection of
research data about the services delivered (please see the Swedish experience)
• measures aimed at improving the outcomes and results of the support service initiatives in the
follow-up phase:
11. venture capital: assuming that the service delivery phase has identified, for example
through the development of a business plan, promising market potentials, the same
business plan could be submitted to specific financial institutions that would provide
financing with the role of firms’shareholders (and not as a loan)
12. temporary management: expert managers lent to the firms for limited periods of time
33
Financing aimed at facilitating the access to the services: we are referring to the users of services, that could, in
this way, have an easier access to the same services (but they should accurately comply with specific and stringent
requirements, such as the willingness to make management time available for the development of an appropriate
business plan).
34
This aspect could also be considered as a pre-condition, but we included it in this category because the
development of the providers’ quality assumes a preliminary identification of the most promising industry sectors
and services.
35
Software packages that emulate the behaviour of experts, since they contain their specific knowledge base
(normally built into databases that can be updated and complemented over time and depending on the interactions
with the users) and a certain set of rules (which resemble, at least to some extent, to decision trees).
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 46 of 49
13. promotional support: for example, participation to export missions, conferences,
exhibitions, joint communication programs, etc.
It must be noted that the implementation of most of the above mentioned measures could (and
should) be:
• and, last but not least, supported in various ways by the public sector.
The reports, according to the specifications provided by the Commission, have described the
current situation in the interested countries.
However, most of the actions suggested by the same reports take and will need to take into
account even more in the near future some important economic and technological
developments such as those directly related to the dramatic growth of electronic business 36.
36
Descriptions normally refer to the past, but “prescriptions” and recommendations are inevitably focused on the
future.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 47 of 49
In particular, one of the research institutions most respected world-wide (Forrester Research)
confirms that Internet and the Web are completely changing or will completely change very soon,
the way business and transactions of any type are conducted:
• the Internet makes actual supply and demand more apparent (and therefore, visible)
• prices naturally fall to their lowest competitive point and vary more as demand shifts
(therefore, making products and services more competitive and more accessible).
These changes are going to be even more dramatic in the “business to business” sector (such as
the one of support services to SMEs) which is, currently, at least ten times larger than the
consumer sector and continuously growing 37.
We therefore think that the first “action” to put in place after this phase of the project should be
the creation of a commission of SMEs and IT experts (please see also the recommendations
contained in the research reports and summarised in chapter 3) who, based on the reports’
findings and the priorities indicated by the various countries and this summary, and other
complementary research sources, could develop a plan and a feasibility study for the
implementation of selected and specific initiatives.
As a conclusion and as we just said, most of the thirteen recommendations listed above, in order
to be concretely implemented, would require specific feasibility studies, and the objectives and
structure of these studies would depend a lot on specific decisions about “what” (the priorities,
both in terms of services and in terms of industry sectors), “who” (the promoters/sponsors and the
implementers), “when” (the timing), “where” (in which countries) and “how” (with which type
and amount of resources, the degree of standardisation across countries, the extent to which
information technologies should be used, the extent to which resources should be allocated during
the design and set-up stage and/or along the life cycle of the projects, etc.).
Furthermore, most recommendations are strictly and operationally interrelated and could only be
implemented in practice after appropriate decisions will be made about the above mentioned
points.
37
Please see, in particular, Mary Modahl, Now or never: how companies must change today to win the battle for
Internet consumers, Harper Business, New York, 2000. This book focuses the attention on consumers, but many
other Forrester Research studies confirm these projections.
Market of Support Services – Final Report – 2000
Page 48 of 49
Evidently, none of the country reports summarised here could go much in depth in these
directions, and our task (of “summarisers” and interpreters) can not be that of filling that gap in
such a huge undertaking.
However, we think that we can be sufficiently specific and detailed with reference to the
recommendation N. 3 (please see above: “systematic classification of services and segmentation of
needs and potential users”), which advocates the realisation of one of the most important
prerequisites for the implementation of – practically – all the other recommendations (38)
The technical and methodological aspects are described in Appendix 2. Here, for the sake of
clarity and completeness, we only list the main reasons why we believe that the identification and
distinction of specific and relatively homogeneous service/market combinations is crucial for the
success of any undertaking in the area of services to SMEs:
• estimating which could be the most appropriate strategies and tactics to satisfy them
• assessing which suppliers/competitors (if any) and in which ways could be able to implement
these strategies and tactics
• estimating the competitive, economic and financial impact of the projected strategies and
tactics (resource allocation among different marketing tools: for example, communication,
quality development, enforcement of quality standards, etc.), within each segment
(38 ) A specific proposal on the subject of “service classification”, that paralleled the study conducted on the Italian
market, was discussed in the framework of the Working Group on Visibility of Suppliers’ Services of the
Concerted Actions, and this is the reason why we think appropriate, apart from the potential usefulness of the
suggestions, to briefly address the issue in this report.
In consideration of the project objectives, we believe that it would be useful to adopt a classification
framework that could facilitate:
· a systematic and coherent synthesis of the various contributions from the member States;
· the identification of priorities, in terms of both additional information needs and concrete action
plans.
Our view is that, after the completion of the analytical and exhaustive description of the market profiles in
the various interested countries (extremely diversified, complex and hardly homogeneous), it will be
necessary to selectively focus our attention and efforts on specific aspects and issues.
Fig. 2
Support Services to SMEs: proposed classification framework
stimulated II
constrained III
regulated
compulsory IV
· suppliers’ profile and value chain configuration (in particular: suppliers’ “ideal” profiles, number of
suppliers, geographical concentration, delivery systems);
· minimum quality standards and benchmarks, best practices, performance measures and metrics;
Obviously, other segmentation parameters (such as industry sector, company size and geographical area)
could fruitfully complement these dimensions and facilitate the identification of priorities, within the
most relevant intersections of the matrix above.
Focus public policies on areas (classes of support services, industry sectors, etc.) which present to a
significant extent most of the following characteristics:
· high potential effectiveness of the services in terms of competitiveness growth in the short-medium
term;
· possibility of overcoming the inadequacy of the SMEs’ available resources (technical and
organisational feasibility);
· opportunities for cost reductions in the delivery of services through partial standardisation and
automation of some phases of the service delivery processes (efficiency and economic feasibility);
· …………………………
In order to better identify such areas, we believe it would be useful to complement the statistical and
quantitative data already collected (or to be collected) with qualitative surveys (already partially realised
in some countries: e.g. Delphi, longitudinal case histories which could represent benchmarks or best
practices, etc.).
Specific proposals (by country and/or overall, and according to the scheme suggested in figure 2 above)
1
Assuming that, as we believe, this is a critical area for an improvement in competitiveness.
Support the planning activity of firms through the development of operational and educational expert
systems (with the possibility of customising the basic applications according to the specific target users
needs) that could be used as a “tool” by certified consultants (this approach could also facilitate the
development of minimum methodological standards)
………………….
Development of Web applications and “virtual consulting” systems (already realised in some European
countries), with the possibility of integrating the applications with automated diagnostic systems (see
above)
………………………….
…an example of support service could be represented by brokerage systems (through the Web): certified
brokers could analyse the applicants’ business plans and identify suitable and interested venture
capitalists
….public or private policies and incentives in this area could easily be integrated with those described
above……
……………………….
Services of class E: information networks that allow a better matching between demand and supply
..a European communication network, supported by the EU, with its own brand name, procedural
standards and marketing systems, could represent the trait d’unionbetween firms and consultants….
· value added (expected/potential contribution to the users): the expected value added, provided it is
perceived by the users 2, can have a significant impact on the price elasticity of demand (which seems
to be high in several countries, especially with reference to the most “brain intensive” services)
· degree of qualification required from the part of the service providers: this aspect has obviously a
significant impact on the economic profile (especially the cost) of the service.
The combination of these two dimensions gives the following 3x3 matrix, in which we have grouped 4
intersections in order to reduce the number of classes from 9 to 7 (please refer also to Fig. 2 in the report).
Fig. A
Levels and classes of support services
qualification
of
providers
value
added
7 classes: A,B,C,D,E,F,G
In the attached Excel file we reproduced the list of support services contained in the project specifications
(Annex C): we would be grateful if you could assign each service (preferably with a “1” in the
2
The possible discrepancy between the intrinsic potential value of the service and the perception of this
value by the target users could suggest promotional activities.
3
For example, we will try to assess the opportunity of adding new items to the list, maintaining the nine
basic classes or reducing their number to seven (as suggested above) or less.