Você está na página 1de 42

1994 by Alexander H.

Slocum

Precision Machine Design


Topic 1
Introduction to the design process for
precision machines
Purpose:
This lecture provides an introduction to the machine design
process, with emphasis on overall design philosophy, case
studies, and concept selection methods.

Outline:

Design methodology

Functional Requirements, Design Parameters, &


Preliminary calculations

Conceptual designs

Importance of sketching designs

Conceptual design:

Machining center design case study

Coordinate measuring machine design case study

Decision making methods

"Enthusiasm is one of the most powerful engines of success.


When you do a thing, do it with all your might. Put your whole
soul into it. Stamp it with your own personality. Be active, be
energetic, be enthusiastic and faithful and you will accomplish
your object. Nothing great was ever achieved without
enthusiasm"
Ralph Waldo Emerson

1-1

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Basic precision machine design philosophy

Designs should be made as mechanically good as is


reasonably possible.

Increases in performance are then obtained via measurement,


mapping, and servo control:

Cost

Metrology frame based


servomechanism
Mapped servomechanism
Simple servomechanism
Mechanical system

Difficulty = Environment Load Range Speed


Accuracy

Make the design hospitable to measurement:

Make room for sensors.

Design in alignment surfaces.

Minimize Abbe errors.

Use modular elements whenever possible:

Create a platform concept that is upgradeable merely


by substituing new components.

Choose bearings, actuators, sensors, and controller as


interdependent components.

Design the machine as if you had to use it.

1-2

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Organize your thought process

Design is like a giant box of Legos

You need to empty the box on the floor and spread the
Legos out in order to find the best parts for your
spaceship.

While looking for a cool wing, you may discover a better


engine!

So:

Organize your brain to be a collector and analyzer of


information.

Organize your thoughts to be a digester of information and a


synthesizer of new designs.

Organize your mind to be an n-dimensional holographic


comparator.

Provide it with systematic and random search, compare,


and synthesizing capabilities.

1-3

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Imagine that your mind is a vast three dimensional array of


cubes which are designed to hold information:
Wisdom
Knowledge

Imagination

With time, the number of cubes that are filled with


information grows.

When you read about a new type of bearing, you file the
information in a knowledge cube.

New methods for using bearings may be filed in an


imagination cube.

Past experiences with the bearing may be filed in a


wisdom cube.

Random or systematic search patterns through the array of


cubes allows you to think of solutions to problems.

During the search for solutions:

Often you will discover that there is a collection of cubes


that do not have the contents you need.

Thus you may discover the need for a new invention.

1-4

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

How to keep informed

Catalogs.

One must keep things in perspective and not develop


catalogitis.

Catalogitis: "design is the gospel according


catalogs, and thou musteth use stock parts."

to

The use of standard versus nonstandard parts must be


considered carefully.

Before specifying a part, a designer should also check a


listing of companies (e.g., in the Thomas Register) .

Trade magazines and their "Bingo cards" (used to order


manufacturers' product literature).

A small personal library of reference books.

Societies that exists for engineers.1

Standards used that pertain to the products being designed.2

Networking:

You must build a network of friends and associates who


can help you to keep informed, and vice versa.

You must be able to function effectively in a team.

For example, the American Society for Precision Engineering in Raleigh, NC (919)
839-8444, and the Japan Society of Precision Engineering.
2
For example, a designer of rotary tables or spindles should keep a copy of Axis of
Rotation: Methods for Specifying and Testing, ANSI Standard B89.3.4M-1985, and
Temperature and Humidity Environment for Dimensional Measurement, ANSI Standard
B89.6.2-1973. A catalog of standards is available from the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th St., New York, NY
10017.
1-5

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Whenever you obtain a new piece of information

Search through your mind and see if this new piece can
combine with any existing pieces to make something useful.

Take note during the search if the information can be useful


to someone else whom you know has a problem that needs
solving.

Networking is one of the most powerful assets of an


information-based society.

Always look for new applications and opportunities.

Opportunity always knocks, but one needs to do a careful


MFT (mental Fourier transform) to see where the peaks are!

1-6

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Resulting Overall design strategy


1 ) Carefully establish your database and networks as stated
above.
2 ) Remember Maudslay's maxims:
l . Get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish,
then you will probably get it.
2 . Keep a sharp look-out upon your materials: get r i d
of every pound of material you can do without. Put
yourself to the question, "what business has i t
there?" Avoid complexities and make everything as
simple as possible.
3 . Remember the get-ability of parts.

Stated by Henry Maudslay in the 1700's, they are the


foundation of concurrent engineering.

3 ) Know your customers. Talk to them directly, in addition to


listening to marketing and maintenance and manufacturing.

1-7

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Recognize that there are three types of design:

Scaled design:

An existing design does the job well, and just needs to


be scaled for the new application.

For example, a ballscrew size change for a larger


machine.

Evolutionary design:

An existing design is pretty good, but fundamental


improvements can be made.

For example, a ballscrew evolves into a planetary


rollerscrew.

1-8

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Revolutionary design:

A totally new approach is used to achieve the same


function, but with better performance.

For example, a linear electric motor instead of a


screw-type transmission.

Rail

Carriage

Linear motor
magnet assembly

Linear
motor coil

1-9

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

But be careful not to jump to quickly!

INA introduced ballscrew-like shaft with a helical gothic


arch lead.

Instead of small balls rolling on a large shaft (at high


speed), it uses four ball bearings:

The inner races are rounded to mate with the


gothic arch groove, and the axes of rotation are
inclined to the shaft.

The result is an order-of-magnitude lower rolling


element velocity, and no need for lost contact during
recirculation.

This actuator is half the cost of a linear motor system


and can run at nearly the same speed!

It is perfect for the actuation of grinding tables at


either creep-feed or reciprocal grinding speeds;
However, it still has the issue of shaft rotational
inertia.

1-10

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

The Result of all the above is the Design Process


A good designer:
Carefully budgets time and resources.
Defines what she wants to accomplish (functional
requirements).
Defines the resources available (materials, parts that
can be used).
Creates solutions ranging from a safe solution to a
neat, wild WOW solution.
Evaluates the physics and feasibility of solutions that
can be created within the context of the allowable time
and budget!
Updates the schedule and budget
Embodiment and Details: Makes the design happen in a
timely, orderly, well-documented manner.
Implements the design (competes) and then reflects on
what went right and wrong.

Functional Requirements, Design Parameters, &


Preliminary calculations
Before you start designing, you have to get your box of
Legos in order.
You are designing a deterministic machine, so
deterministically:
Determine what the machine must do (Functional
Requirements, Frs)
Start thinking about what elements (Design Parameters, DPs)
could enable you to satisfy the FRS.
Identify the physics that govern the performance of the DPs.

1-11

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Functional Requirements (FRs) & Design


Parameters (DPs)
From the overall strategy, the functional requirements can be
developed (sketches of the design strategy can be helpful).
Design Parameters: Physical attributes that satisfy FRs.

Physics of the problem


It is often useful to list the physics involved next to the
functional requirements (simple models can help).

Example:
Basic FRs
Fast travel
speed

Initial DPs
Easy to do

Impressive

WOW

0.25m/s

.5 m/s

1 m/s

Dominant
physics
F=ma
=Fr
V=at
V=r
x=0.5at

Front
scooper

Forklift
type (raise
only)

Raise and
curl

Raise, curl,
extend

M=Fl
=Mc/I

Climb peak

wheels
close
spaced

Tracks

Jump!

Friction
F=F N

Not
flippable

Low center Outriggers


of gravity,
wide stance

1-12

BIG wheels, M=0


no
basic
protruding
stability
hardware,
drives upside
down

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Conceptual design

Conceptual design can affect a machine's:

Accuracy.

Repeatability.

Resolution.

Frictional qualities.

Difficulty of design.

Difficulty of manufacture.

Operating cleanliness.

Cost.

Safety.

Ruggedness.

Availability.

Any overlooked item will come back to haunt you, so get it


right the first time!

1-13

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

There are several methods for generating conceptual


designs:
FIRST get the design team to identify the
Functional Requirements!, Then:

Individual thought:

Rohrbach's 635 method:

Often the most creative.

First individual, and then group analysis and


discussions, offers the best of both worlds.

Group brainstorming:

Greatest breadth of resources applied collectively.

1-14

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Individual thought is often the most creative.

Do leisurely things (e.g., long walks) that you know inspire


creative thought.

Get out of traffic and take alternate routes.

Sketch ideas and the ideas principal components.

Cut out the principal components and pretend they are


modular elements.

Like toy building blocks, try different combinations of


components to make different machines.

Pit one machine idea against another and imagine


strategies for winning.

Take the best from different ideas and evolve them into
the best 2 or 3 ideas that you can think of.

1-15

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Rohrbach's 635 method:

Six people write down their three best ideas and circulate
them to the other five for comments.

The people then get together to discuss their ideas.

A written record is made of who first had the idea, so


personality conflicts are more easily avoided.

It tends to generate a collective mind, so everybody knows


what everyone else has been thinking.

The group mind then works together in a more efficient


manner when brainstorming.

1-16

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Group brainstorming:

A means to often solve personal creativity deadlocks.

A means to make sure something hasn't been overlooked.

Group personality factors must be considered:

Shy individuals getting run over.

Aggressive individuals driving.

An individual's personality often has nothing to do with


creativity.

Careful to avoid conflicts over the issue of who first thought


of the idea.

The people in the group must be willing to take praise or


scolding as a group.

Formal methods exist.

Psychologists have generated established rules to make


the process work successfully.3

Have the meeting over the hardware! or in the shop!

G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Konstruktionslehre, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.


Translated and published as Engineering Design, Design Council, London, 1984, pp. 8788.
1-17

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Importance of sketching designs

The ability to sketch approximate scale drawings of a


concept is invaluable.

Sloppy disproportionate sketches send a signal to


managers that the design will also be sloppy.

Design sketches of ideas and major components allow one to


build and compare models of ideas.

A matrix of ideas can be laid out and "what-if"


scenarios can then be performed.

"Moving" components (a piece of paper) from design to


design allows for rapid real-time evolution.

1-18

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

The ability to sketch a stick figure of a design and label the


error motions is invaluable.

Knowing where the errors are signals that you


understand the physics of the design.

The ability to tell which error motions cause critical errors


at the tool point is invaluable.

Knowing what the critical errors are signals that you


understand the details of the design.

A stick figure helps to:

Define the sensitive directions in a machine.

Locate coordinate systems.

Set the stage for error budgeting.

It helps to prevent the designer from locking in on a shape


too early.
Spindle
(rotor in bearings)

110 Z carriage

300

215

Wheel/
Workpiece

240
330
115

400

100

Y carriage
Sensitive for surface
and profile grinding

700

545

Table

Sensitive for profile


grinding

Column

300

450
1700

100

Reference

Bed

425
315

1700
400

1-19

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Sketching example: A surface grinder:


Z axis linear motion bearings
Z axis Ballscrew
Y axis column

Y axis carriage
Z axis carriage

Table
Bed

Wheel
Z
Y
X

Y axis motor

1-20

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Preliminary calculations
Past the hand sketch, and before the computer sketch, to
determine feasability, and to guiode initial FEA.
Spreadsheets provided with this course to aid in the design of
precision machines:
Spreadsheet

Purpose

AHP.XLS

To apply the Analytic Hierarchy Process to selection of the "best"


concept

BALLSCRW.XLS To determine equivalent load rating for ballscrew selection


BEAMBEND.XLS To determine slope, bending, and shear deflections of a simply
supported beam loaded by its own weight.
BIMAT.XLS

To determine thermal deformations in a bi-material beam

BOLTJDES.XLS

To design bolted joints

CYLNDEXP.XLS To calculate the radial displacement of a pressurized cylinder


HERT.XLS

To determine Hertz contact stresses between bodies in point


contact.

HERTZTAN.XLS To determine tangential stiffness and contact stress between two


bodies (e.g., for friction drive design)
KINCOUP.XLS

To design three groove kinematic couplings

KINSLIDE.XLS

To analyze of errors in a kinematically supported carriage (slide)

RAILDES.XLS

To design bolted "boxway" bearing rails

RAILFND.XLS

To determine characteristics of a bolted rail on elastic foundation

SCREWPOW.XLS To calculate power to turn a screw


CLD.XLS

To design a constrained layer damper

THERMERR.XLS To determine temperature gradient induced errors in a simply


supported beam
TMDDES.XLS

To design tuned mass dampers

1-21

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Error Budget Spreadsheets provided with this course to aid in


the design of precision machines:
Spreadsheet Name

User Input

Output to User

CShelp.XLS

Location (position and


orientation) of coordinate
systems for tool and work.

none

CS_inp.XLS

none.

Ideal location of tool in work.

K_inp.XLS

Compliances between
coordinate systems.

None.

F&M_inp.XLS

Forces and moments applied to


coordinate systems.

Resultant sum forces and


moments.

Temp_inp.XLS

Thermal expansion coefficient


and temperature differences
between coordinate systems.

Thermal expansion errors.

Geo_err.XLS

Geometric errors between the


coordinate systems

Sum_err.XLS

None

Sum of all the errors in each


coordinate system.

Err_out.XLS

Error toggle switch and


mapping improvement factors

Ideal and actual location of tool in


work, and the resulting location
error between the tool and the
work in the reference frame

1-22

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Conceptual design: Decision making methods

There are many systematic methods available for evaluating


design alternatives.

Most rely on some sort of weighting of attributes to


arrive at a "desirability score".

The simplest method is a linear weighting scheme:

Apply a desirability value to each parameter that affects


the performance of a component in a design.

Easiest to use provided user bias can be minimized.

Acceptable when there are only a few design alternatives


to consider.

A linear weighting scheme (a series of +, -, 0 wrt a


baseline design) will give equal weighting to attributes.

Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4


(Baseline)

Accuracy

Ergonomics

Cost

Flexibility

Robustness

Manufacturability

Serviceability

Total + and -

-1

Use to identify positive attributes of competing designs that


can be blended in with the best to make it better.

1-23

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Example: Select a linear bearing for a machine tool

Factors to consider in their selection include:


Accuracy of motion: Straightness, Smoothness.
Friction Characteristics: Static , Dynamic .
Cost: Purchase, Install, Maintain

When there are more than several variables, it is often


difficult to evaluate their relative importance.

It is like trying to add Newtons to meters, the dimensions


cannot be added properly.

A method is needed to non-dimensionalize the parameters.

Rail

Carriage (saddle)

Keeper
Base
C, Co

E1

Mt
Mto

Ml
Mlo
S1 THREAD

H1
N2

B
E2
E3

N1
H2
N3

S2 SCREW SIZE
A2

A3

S3 SCREW SIZE

A1

R
R

u
R

Ru

V
R

Rl

Rl

1-24

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Thomas Saaty developed the Analytic Hierarchy Process


(AHP) to help make complex decisions.

First determine the relative importance of each


characteristic at each level in the outline of design
attributes.

Next evaluate the relative characteristics of each


component of the design with respect to the most explicit
characteristic.

Comparisons are done with experienced personnel from:

Engineering

Marketing

Manufacturing

Service

The relative evaluation characteristics' importances are


debated in an open forum.

The relative importances of the components are debated


in an open forum.

Egos are diffused, and only rationally justifiable


positions are accepted.

This is an excellent method to start a project off


on a concurrent engineering track

1-25

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Step 1: Setting up the AHP Model

Compare the AHP's construction to a system of water tanks


100%
Le v e l 1

40%

20%

40%
Le v e l 2

Le v e l 3
25%

15%

12%

8%

15%

15%

10%

The distribution of water is analogous to the distribution of


priorities (or weights).

The desirability (or weight) for each entry with respect to


other entries on that level can be equated to:

The distribution (by percent) of the initial volume of


water among the reservoirs on the same level.

At any level the total percentage of water distributed among


the reservoirs at that level is equal to 100%.
Select a bearing for a Diamond Turning Machine
Accuracy
Straightness

Smoothness

Friction
Dynamic

Cost
Static

1-26

Purchase

Install

Maintain

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Step 2: Importance of design choices

The evaluation of a design option is done by determining its


"importance" for each Level 3 entry (the lowest level).

The "importance" of an item with respect to each entry in


Level 3 can be expressed in terms of actual physical values.

Most often, a numerical scale should be used such as:


Importance

Definition

Equal importance

One a little more important than the other (1/3)

One is more important than the other (1/5)

One is much more important than the other (1/7)

Absolute importance (1/9)

Accuracy

Friction

Cost

Accuracy

Friction

.5

Cost

.25

.5

The team debates the comparisons and fills out the top row.
The matrix is diagonal, and determinism is applied to ensure
consistency.
Check lower diagonal values to make sure the team agrees
with them.

This forms a "fuzzy Logic set" characterizing what


the team feels are the important judgment factors
for a design.
1-27

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Priority is approximately the geometric mean of the row.

Overall priority is normalized with respect to the sum of the


individual priorities.

The level three normalized priorities are multiplied by the


corresponding level two normalized priorities.

This yields a normalized weight for the level three


characteristics.

For the bearing selection, the spreadsheet output for levels 2


& 3 is:
Priority N. Prior.
2.000
0.571
1.000
0.286
0.500
0.143
3.500
1.000

=57%
=29%
=14%

Accuracy Straight. Smooth.


Straightness 1.000 0 . 5 0 0
Smoothness 2.000
1.000
Sum
3.000
1.500

Priority N. Prior. N. Wght


0.707
0.333
0.190
1.414
0.667
0.381
2.121
1.000
0.571

33*57=19%
67*57=38%

Friction
Static
Dynamic
Sum

Priority N. Prior. N. Wght


2.000
0.800
0.229
0.500
0.200
0.057
2.500
1.000
0.286

80*29=23%
20*29=6%

Accuracy
Friction
Cost
Sum

Cost
Purchase
Install
Maintain
Sum

Accuracy Friction
1.000 2 . 0 0 0
0.500
1.000
0.250
0.500
1.750
3.500

Static Dynamic
1.000 4 . 0 0 0
0.250
1.000
1.250
5.000
Purchase
1.000
2.000
2.000
5.000

Cost
4.000
2.000
1.000
7.000

Install Maintain
0.500 0.500
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
2.500
2.500

Level 2

Level 3

Level 3

Priority N. Prior. N. Wght


0.630
0.200
0.029
1.260
0.400
0.057
1.260
0.400
0.057
3.150
1.000
0.143

Note that the total of all the normalized weights is 1.0.

Each matrix is diagonal (mathematical relationships).


enter numbers in bold

Level 3

Only

This defuzzifies the qualitative judgments so they


can be applied in a deterministic manner to evaluate
options.

1-28

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Step 3: Results

Desirability is found by combining the normalized weights


with the relative evaluations of bearing characteristics:
7

desirability = (level 3 weights) (bearing desirability values)


j=1

Again, a team discusses and justifies the comparisons, s o


novice designers become enlightened.

For the bearing selection, the spreadsheet output is:

Bearing comparison:
Straight. Smooth. Static mu Dyn. mu Purchase
Sliding teflon 7 0 . 0 0 0 7 . 0 0 0
1.000
2.000
5.000
Rolling balls 6 0 . 0 0 0 5 . 0 0 0
3.000
5.000
3.000
Hydrostatic
90.000 9.000
9.000
5.000
1.000

Install
3.000
5.000
2.000

Overall Norm
Maintain Goodness Goodness
5.000
0.274
0.27
5.000
0.283
0.28
1.000
0.443
0.44

To prevent a person from driving the results to their


favorite without rational discussion:

Each product in the overall goodness column is


normalized by the sum of the choices' desirability values.

1-29

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

The AHP should be used by a group of "experts" from


engineering, marketing, manufacture, maintenance, etc.

The numbers you generate while practicing alone may


seem arbitrary to you.

However, they do get you to think about the design


criteria.

A group will educate members about why design


decisions are made.

It helps a group to rapidly converge on consensus,


because it forces members to focus on one topic at a
time.

It then gives a deterministic means to pull all the


elements together for a total decision.

1-30

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Case study: Cincinnati Milacron's high speed


machining center (HSMC)

Designed for high speed hole drilling and near-net-shape


part finishing.

Speed and reliability were of prime concern.

Goal was to minimize the number of parts.

Machine would be used in duplex mode (two machines facing


each other), so a horizontal spindle was required.

1-31

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Conceptual designs

Fully articulated and traveling articulated designs:

Low rigidity.

Large error at tool cause by angular error at joint (Abbe


error).

Too many degrees of freedom.

1-32

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Scissors jack design:

Large number of joints.

Non-uniform transmission ratio:

1-33

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Rectilinear design for a high speed machining center:

Linear axes are easy to manufacture.

Configuration lends itself to the use of a single moving wall


to prevent chips and coolant from getting into sensitive
areas.
Spindle

1-34

Moving wall

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

1-35

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Effects of sealing systems on concept selection

Greater stiffness and accuracy can be obtained if the duplex


requirement is dropped and the pallet is allowed to be on a
moving axis.

The spindle is then carried on a 2 degree of freedom


stacked axis.

The work holding table (pallet) has a single degree of


freedom.

With the pallet on a Z axis, the spindle stacked axes only


needs a single seal:

The Y axis can be positioned behind a moving wall.

1-36

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Case study: Sheffield's ring bridge coordinate


measuring machine (CMM)

Structural configurations for CMMs:

Fixed table cantilever arm CMM.

Moving bridge CMM.

Column type CMM.

Moving ram horizontal arm CMM.

Moving table horizontal arm CMM.

Gantry type CMM.

Ring bridge type CMM.

Goodness can be defined by CA factor:


CA = volume throughput
accuracy price

(1.6.1)

The CA factors for existing machines and the CA factor


customers wanted indicated the need for a new CMM design.
Z

Ring bridge

Workpiece
table

Probe

1-37

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Applying the AHP method to CMM design

The CA factor is not too helpful for a qualitative comparison


of design concepts.

Existing design types to be evaluated using the AHP include:

Fixed table cantilever arm


Moving bridge
Column
Moving ram horizontal arm
Moving table horizontal arm
Gantry
Ring bridge

1-38

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

AHP parameters for CMM evaluation:

Accuracy
Modularity
Scanning (contouring)
X axis
Abbe (sensors)
Yaxis
Abbe (actuators)
Zaxis (ram)
Abbe (bearings)
Structure
Center of stiffness/mass congruence
Dynamic (stiffness)
Evolvability
Dynamic (mass)
Automated
Decoupling (part weight)
Touch trigger
Different sizes
Cost
Sale price
Ergonomics
Maintain
Operator
Labor to produce
Service
Components to buy
Sales
Manufacturability
Bearings
Structure
Assembly

1-39

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

The importance of the major design criteria were assumed to


be:

Accuracy
Cost
Manufacturability
Modularity
Evolvability
Ergonomics
Sum

Manufact- Modul- E v o l v - ErgonNorm.


Accuracy
C o s t urability
arity
a b i l i t y o m i c s Priority priority
1.00 1 . 0 0
3.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
2.69
0.34
1.00 1.00
3.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
2.69
0.34
0.33 0.33
1.00
1.67
1.67
1.67
0.90
0.11
0.20 0.20
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.54
0.07
0.20 0.20
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.54
0.07
0.20 0.20
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.54
0.07
2.93 2.93
8.80
14.67
14.67
14.67
7.88
1.00

Existing design types evaluated using the AHP gave the


following results:

Column
Moving table horizontal arm
Moving bridge
Fixed table cantilever arm
Moving ram horizontal arm
Ring bridge
Gantry

1-40

0.75
0.84
0.88
1.00
1.01
1.05
1.07

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

When one performs a sensitivity analysis by trying different


priorities in the AHP spreadsheet:

The accuracy requirement drives the decision towards a


closed frame structure.

It also implies that the part should not rest on a moving axis.

The gantry design drives the main mass closer to the center
of mass and stiffness.

The ring bridge design drives the mass through the bottom
portion of the ring.

If ease of part loading and the ability to program the CMM


in teach mode, the ring bridge may become an equal choice.

The lighter moving structure of the bridge design would


make the gantry machine easier to move by hand.

Even though the access is more limited.

1-41

1994 by Alexander H. Slocum

Two designs were done, and cost and ergonomics


considerations indicated the ring bridge design was best.

From the sales literature


Company):

(Courtesy of Sheffield Measurement, a Giddings & Lewis

1-42

Você também pode gostar