Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Strategic Management
Analysis
Module Guide
Contents
1. Key information ................................................................................................................................... 2
2. Introduction to the Module (MDF, section 6A) ...................................................................................... 2
3. Intended Learning Outcomes (MDF, section 7) ................................................................................... 3
3.1 Employability skills delivered in this Module ...................................................................................3
4. Outline Delivery ................................................................................................................................... 4
4.1 Attendance Requirements ..............................................................................................................7
4.2 Reading List @ Anglia....................................................................................................................7
5. Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1 Element 010 Time-constrained case study..................................................................................9
6. Assessment Criteria and Marking Standards ..................................................................................... 11
6.1 Specific assessment criteria .........................................................................................................11
6.2 University Generic Assessment Criteria .......................................................................................12
7. Re-Assessment Information .............................................................................................................. 14
8. Report on Last Delivery of Module ..................................................................................................... 16
9. Links to Other Key Information .......................................................................................................... 17
Page 1
Module Guide
1. Key information
Module:Strategic Management Analysis
Module Leader: Dr. David Holliman
Module Tutor: Shashini Withana (Online Delivery)
Every module has a Module Definition Form (MDF) which is the officially validated record of the module.
You can access the MDF for this module in five ways via:
All modules delivered by Anglia Ruskin University at its main campuses in the UK and at Associate
Colleges throughout the UK and overseas are governed by the Academic Regulations. You can view
these at www.anglia.ac.uk/academicregs. An extract of the Academic Regulations, known as the
Assessment Regulations, is available at this website too (all new students will receive a copy as part of
their welcome pack).
In the unlikely event of any discrepancy between the Academic Regulations and any other publication,
including this module guide, the Academic Regulations, as the definitive document, take precedence
over all other publications and will be applied in all cases.
Page 2
Module Guide
Knowledge and
understanding
Knowledge and
understanding
Intellectual, practical,
affective and
transferable skills
Intellectual, practical,
affective and
transferable skills
Interpret that detailed analysis correctly and then report and present those
findings in an appropriate manner.
Communication (oral)
Communication (written)
Commercial awareness
Cultural sensitivity
Customer focus
Data handling
Decision making
Enterprising
Flexibility
Initiative
Interpersonal skills
Leadership/management of others
Networking
Organisational adaptability
Project management
Problem-solving and analytical skills
Responsibility
Team working
Time management
Other
Page 3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Module Guide
4. Outline Delivery
Session
1
Lecture
Introduction to
strategic
management
Study area
Introduction to the
module
The concept of strategy
How to analyse and
prepare strategy cases
Strategic
Purpose
Stakeholder
Analysis
Stakeholder mapping
Reading references
Grant, R.M. and Jordan, J., 2012. Foundations of
strategy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons: Chapter 1
Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (2011), Exploring
Corporate Strategy (Text and Cases),(9th ed): Chapter 1
Porter, M. E., 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business
Review, 74(6), pp. 61-78.
Grant, R.M. and Jordan, J., 2012. Foundations of
strategy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons: Chapter 1
Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (2011), Exploring
Corporate Strategy (Text and Cases),(9th ed): Chapter 4
Campbell, A. and Yeung, S., 1991. Creating a sense of
mission. Long Range Planning, 24(4), pp. 10-20.
Collins, J. and Porras, J., 1996. Building your companys
vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), pp. 65-77.
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R., 2011. Creating shared
value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), pp. 62-77.
Grant, R.M. and Jordan, J., 2012. Foundations of
strategy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons: Chapter 5
Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (2011), Exploring
Corporate Strategy (Text and Cases),(9th ed): Chapter 4
Strategic
Analysis:
External
Scenarios
Industry life-cycle
Module Guide
Environment
Analysis
Strategic
Analysis:
External
Environment
Analysis
Porters 5 Forces
Segmentation
Key/critical success
factors
Strategic
Analysis:
Resources and
Capabilities
Resources and
capabilities
VRIO analysis
Page 5
Module Guide
Strategic
Analysis: Value
Chain
Strategic
Formulation:
Business
Strategies
Strategic
Formulation:
Corporate
Strategy
Cost leadership
Differentiation
Integration
Vertical integration
Diversification
Page 6
Module Guide
Page 7
Module Guide
5. Assessment
Part
Type of
Assessment
Draft 2-page
outline of all three
tasks
010
LearningO
utcomes
Word
Limit
Submission Method
Time constrained
case study (100%)
N/A
02 pages
100%
3,000
words
http://lsm.edappy.com/
Submission Dates
Key
Contact
Person
Tutor
Tutor
Individual
submission
%
Weighting
&Fine
Grade(FG)
orpass/fail(P
F)
http://lsm.edappy.com/
Page 8
Module Guide
1. Question 1
Mark
20
Learning
Outcome
1-2
2. Question 2
25
2-3
3. Question 3
25
2-3
4. Question 4
25
1-4
TOTAL MARKS
100%
In order to prepare you for your assessment, the case and questions will be released four weeks
before the submission deadline. This is a time-constrained task and you have to plan your time
in advance.
You will apply models from the classes and readings to your analysis of the case. You will be allowed
to include one attachment page (appendix), which presents facts arranged in a table, figure, or chart
format. The attachment is not included in the word count.
The 3000-word limit for answering the questions will be enforced.
You should use font point 12, single spacing, and 1-inch margins. You should provide a reference list
using the Harvard Referencing Style. The reference list is not included in the word count.
Avoid restating facts from the case or describing theories. Focus your writing on strategic analysis.
Remember that there is no single correct answer to a case analysis. A good case analysis contains a
careful analysis of the situation, supported by relevant conceptual frameworks.
You will receive feedback on your report within 20 working days.
PLEASE REFER TO MARKING CRITERIA FOR THE CASE STUDY ON SECTION 6 OF THIS
DOCUMENT
All coursework assignments and other forms of assessment must be submitted by the published
deadline which will communicated to you thruogh email. It is your responsibility to know when work is
due to be submitted ignorance of the deadline date will not be accepted as a reason for late or nonsubmission.
Page 9
Module Guide
Feedback
You are entitled to feedback on your performance for all your assessed work. For all assessment tasks
which are not examinations, this is accomplished by a member of academic staff providing your mark
and associated comments which will relate to the achievement of the modules intended learning
outcomes and the assessment criteria you were given for the task when it was first issued.
The marker of your assignment will include feedback on written assignments that includes answers to
these three key questions:
1.
What is your overall feedback?
2.
How does your assignment compare to the marking criteria?
3.
How can you improve in the future?
London School of Marketingis committed to provide you with feedback on all assessed work within 20
working days of the submission deadline or the date of an examination. This is extended to 30 days for
feedback for a Major Project module (please note that working days excludes those days when London
School of Marketing is officially closed; e.g.: between Christmas and New Year). Personal tutors will offer
to read feedback from several modules and help you to address any common themes that may be
emerging.
On occasion, you will receive feedback and marks for pieces of work that you completed in the earlier
stages of the module. We provide you with this feedback as part of the learning experience and to help
you prepare for other assessment tasks that you have still to complete. It is important to note that, in
these cases, the marks for these pieces of work are unconfirmed. This means that, potentially, marks
can change, in either direction!
Marks for modules and individual pieces of work become confirmed on the Dates for the Official
Publication of Results which can be checked at www.anglia.ac.uk/results.
Page 10
Module Guide
A (70-100 marks)
1. Excellent
knowledge and
understanding of
the topic
2. Excellent
integration of theory
into practice
3. Analytical originality
and autonomy
4. Balanced and
coherent
arguments
5. Complementary
use of relevant
sources of
information
6. Excellent academic
and problemsolving skills
7. Excellent
presentation skills
(structured and
accurate written
expression and
referencing)
8. Identify issues that
the majority of
students did not
consider and
provide insightful
recommendations
B (60-69 marks)
1. Good knowledge
and
understanding of
the topic
2. Good integration
of theory into
practice
3. Some analytical
originality and
self-directed
research
4. Consistent and
convincing
arguments
5. Complementary
use of relevant
sources of
information
6. Good academic
and problemsolving skills
7. Good
presentation skills
(structured and
accurate written
expression and
good referencing)
8. Identify all the key
issues and
provide good
recommendations
C (50-59 marks)
1. Satisfactory
knowledge and
understanding of the
topic
2. Satisfactory
integration of theory
into practice
3. Some but inconsistent
analytical autonomy
4. Acceptable and fairly
well-structured
arguments
5. Some use of relevant
sources of information
6. Acceptable level of
academic and
problem-solving skills,
going beyond
description at times
7. Satisfactory
presentation skills
(structured and mainly
accurate written
expression and
adequate referencing)
8. Some of the key
issues are missing.
Recommendations
lack in sophisticated
thinking
Page 11
D (40-49 marks)
1. Basic knowledge
and
understanding of
the topic
2. Basic integration
of theory into
practice
3. Restricted
analytical ability;
mainly descriptive
4. Arguments are
sufficiently
identifiable and
free of obvious
contradiction
5. Basic use of
sources of
information
6. Basic evidence of
academic and
problem-solving
skills
7. Basic
presentation skills
(some difficulty
with accuracy in
written expression
and referencing)
8. Merely a
summary of facts,
with elementary
recommendations
Module Guide
Outcome
90-100%
80-89%
70-79%
Achieves
module
outcome(s)
related to GLO
at this level
60-69%
50-59%
Page 12
Module Guide
40-49%
A marginal
pass in module
outcome(s)
related to GLO
at this level
30-39%
A marginal fail
in module
outcome(s)
related to GLO
at this level.
Possible
compensation.
Satisfies
qualifying mark
Fails to achieve
module
outcome(s)
related to this
GLO.
Qualifying mark
not satisfied.
No
compensation
available
20-29%
10-19%
1-9%
0%
Page 13
Module Guide
7. Re-Assessment Information
010
Type of
Assessment
Word or
Time Limit
Submission Method
Time constrained
case study (100%)
3000 words
Individual
submission
1. Question 1
Mark
20
Learning
Outcome
1-2
2. Question 2
25
2-3
3. Question 3
25
2-3
4. Question 4
25
1-4
TOTAL MARKS
Page 14
100%
Module Guide
In order to prepare you for your re-sit assessment, the case and questions will be released one
month before the submission deadline. This is a time-constrained task and you have to plan your
time in advance.
You will apply models from the classes and readings to your analysis of the case. You will be
allowed to include one attachment page (appendix), which presents facts arranged in a table,
figure, or chart format. The attachment is not included in the word count.
The 3000-word limit for answering the questions will be enforced.
You should use font point 12, single spacing, and 1-inch margins. You should provide a reference
list using the Harvard Referencing Style. The reference list is not included in the word count.
Avoid restating facts from news/reports or describing theories. Focus your writing on strategic
analysis.
Remember that there is no single correct answer to a case analysis. A good case analysis
contains a careful analysis of the situation, supported by relevant conceptual frameworks.
Your tutors will not look at any part of your report before the submission. You will receive
feedback on your report within 20 working days.
All coursework assignments and other forms of assessment must be submitted by the published
deadline whichis detailed above. It is your responsibility to know when work is due to be submitted
ignorance of the deadline date will not be accepted as a reason for late or non-submission.
You are requested to keep a copy of your work.
PLEASE REFER TO THE MARKING CRITERIA ON SECTION 6 OF THIS DOCUMENT
Page 15
Module Guide
Semester/Trimester:01
Student Achievement Provide a brief overview of student achievement on the module as evidenced by the range of marks awarded. A
detailed breakdown of marks will be available at the Submissions Department.
The overall submission rate was 87% during the last session with a pass rate of 86%. The Mean Mark for the
module was 49% and the marks ranged from 13% to 73%.
The tight time constraint for the assessment is found to be challenging by most students. However, the resources
provided by London School of Marketing which are specifically designed for the assessment for this period is found
to be helpful by students.
Module Leader/Tutors Reflection on Delivery of the Module, including Response to Feedback from Students
The students were not engaging in regular communications to improve their understanding of the requirements of
the assessment. Those students who did and took avid interest in incorporating tutor feedback to their final
submissions earned higher marks for their final submissions. The students are highly encouraged to write to the
tutor and clarify their doubts and make a good use of the feedback service.
Developments during the current year or planned for next year (if appropriate)
The online resources provided to the students are periodically reviewed to incorporate updates and the changes to
the module guide and the assessment to be very useful to the students.
External Examiners Comments State whether the external examiner agreed the marks and/or commented on the
module
Theexternal examineragreed with the marks awarded and was pleased with the quality of the detailed comments
provided in mark sheets.
Page 16
Module Guide
Page 17
Version 3
1. Module Title
Strategic Management Analysis
2a. Module Leader
Elisa Alt
2b. Department
2c. Faculty
Dept of Marketing, Strategy and Lord Ashcroft International
Enterprise
Business School
3a. Level
6
4a. Credits
15
5. Restrictions
Type
Module Code
PreNone
requisites:
CoNone
requisites:
Exclusions:
None
Courses to which this
None
module is restricted
150
Module Name
Condition
Page 1 of 3
Mode of Delivery
Distance Learning
Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3