Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Please note: Images will appear in color online but will be printed in black and white.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Article Title
Journal Name
Family Name
Particle
Given Name
Suffix
Corresponding
Author
Tian
Yuqiang
Organization
Division
11
Address
12
tyq@bnu.edu.cn
13
Family Name
Ouyang
14
Particle
15
Given Name
16
Suffix
10
17
Shengnan
Organization
18
Division
19
Address
20
21
Family Name
22
Particle
23
Given Name
24
Author
Author
Liu
Q ianyuan
Suffix
25
Organization
26
Division
27
Address
28
29
Family Name
30
Particle
31
Given Name
32
Suffix
33
Organization
34
Division
35
Address
36
37
Family Name
38
Particle
39
Given Name
40
Suffix
41
Author
Wang
Ruixue
Organization
42
Division
43
Address
44
45
Family Name
46
Particle
47
Given Name
48
Suffix
49
Author
Xu
Xingliang
Organization
50
Division
51
Address
52
xuxingl@hotmail.com
53
Received
28 September 2015
54
Author
Schedule
55
56
Revised
Accepted
Abstract
21 April 2016
Background and aims: To test the hypothesis that dominant plant species
could acquire different nitrogen (N) forms over a spatial scale and they also
have the ability to compete for available N with microbes.
Methods: A short-term 15N labeling experiment was conducted in the
temperate grassland ecosystem of North China in July of 2013. Three N forms
(NO3 , NH4+ and glycine) labeled with 15N were injected into the two soil
depths (05 and 515 cm) surrounding each plant to explore N acquisition by
plants and microbes. Three dominant plant species (Artemisia frigida,
Cleistogenes squarrosa and Artemisia capillaris) were investigated.
Results: Two hours after 15N labeling, all three dominant plant species
absorbed both organic and inorganic N, but different patterns were observed at
two soil depths. Uptake of NO3 was significantly higher at 05 cm than at
515 cm soil depth among all the dominant plant species. 15N recovery by
microbes was significantly higher than plants. However, 15N recovery by
plants showed different patterns over soil depths.
Conclusions: Dominant plant species in the temperate grassland have different
patterns in acquisition of N added to soil in organic form and absorption of
inorganic N, and microbes were more effectively than plants at competing for N
in a short-term period.
57
Keywords separated
by ' - '
58
Foot note
information
Plant Soil
DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2904-3
4
5
REGULAR ARTICLE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Abstract
Background and aims To test the hypothesis that dominant plant species could acquire different nitrogen (N)
forms over a spatial scale and they also have the ability to
compete for available N with microbes.
Methods A short-term 15N labeling experiment was conducted in the temperate grassland ecosystem of North
China in July of 2013. Three N forms (NO3, NH4+ and
glycine) labeled with 15N were injected into the two soil
depths (05 and 515 cm) surrounding each plant to
explore N acquisition by plants and microbes. Three
dominant plant species (Artemisia frigida, Cleistogenes
squarrosa and Artemisia capillaris) were investigated.
Results Two hours after 15N labeling, all three dominant
plant species absorbed both organic and inorganic N,
but different patterns were observed at two soil depths.
Uptake of NO3 was significantly higher at 05 cm than
at 515 cm soil depth among all the dominant plant
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Introduction
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
9
7
8
10
PR
O
O
F
1
3
2
Plant Soil
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
PR
O
O
F
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Q1 68
69
70
71
72
73
Q2 74
Q3 75
Q4 76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Plant Soil
160
Experiment design
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
PR
O
O
F
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
154
155
156
157
158
159
t1:1
t1:2
27 2
t1:3
1.4 0.09
t1:4
C/N
11.3 0.05
t1:5
pH
8.17 0.03
t1:6
NH4+-N (g N g1d.w.soil)
t1:7
NO3N
t1:8
glycine-N (g N g1d.w.soil)
(g N g d.w.soil)
3.05 0.09
7.12 0.09
1.39 0.09
Plant Soil
248
249
250
Q5 251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
Ulabeled
100
15Nadded
where mlabeled refers to the total mass (g m2) of 15Nlabeled N injected per quadrat, and munlabeled refers to
the mass of available N forms measured in soils.
Ulabeled (g m2) refers to uptake of 15N from the source
mlabeled, and Uunlabeled refers to uptake of available N
from the source munlabeled.
Uunlabeled divided by root biomass (g m2) and 15N
labeling time (h) (Gioseffi et al. 2012), we would get N
uptake rate by plants (g N g1 d.w.root h1) (Recovery
is not necessarily a direct function of uptake rate in the
following section).
279
280
added
100
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
Results
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
15
PR
O
O
F
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
Plant Soil
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
F
Fig. 1 The biomass and root to shoot ratio (values) of the dominant plant species in the temperate grasslands of North China. The
error bars show mean SE (n = 16). Different letters show
significant differences among aboveground biomass and belowground biomass of the dominant plant species, and the values upon
the bars were the root to shoot ratios
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
Plant Soil
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
The N competition between plants and microbes is obvious. 15N recovery by microbial biomass is significantly
higher than by plants (Table 2, Fig. 3). There were significant effects and strong interactions of species, N forms
and soil depth on N uptake by plants and microbes.
396
Discussion
397
398
399
t2:1
t2:2
t2:3
t2:4
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
F
Sources of variation
15
N recovery by microbes
F value
P values
15
N recovery by plants
F values
P values
Species
62.717
<0.001
8.525
<0.001
t2:5
N forms
5.279
0.028
92.972
<0.001
t2:6
Soil depth
0.001
0.971
t2:7
0.836
0.442
5.086
<0.011
t2:8
Species N forms
8.955
<0.001
17.038
<0.001
t2:9
0.516
0.477
29.740
<0.001
t2:10
3.290
0.049
3.274
0.049
106.39
<0.001
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
Plant Soil
20
a
microbial
C
b b
a b b
plant
microbial
0-5cmb
D
b
80
20
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
a a b
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
5-15cm c
microbial
plant
60
40
C. squarrosa
A. capillaris
A. frigida
40
0
15
5-15cm
60
100
+ 15
80
NH4 - N recovery(%)
0-5cm
PR
O
O
F
NO3--15N recovery(%)
100
plant
microbial
15
b b
plant
bars show means SE (n = 4). The bars sharing the same letter are
not significantly different at P = 0.05
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457Q6
458
Plant Soil
100
5-15cm 0-5cm
nitrate
glycine
ammonium
60
40
20
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
t3:1
t3:2
Rooting depth
(cm)
t3:3
Artemisia
frigida
80
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
0-5cm
PR
O
O
F
Artemisia
capillaris
t3:4
05
146.0
331.1
80.1
t3:5
515
93.1
205.6
19.7
t3:6
05/515 ratio
1.6 0.35
1.6 0.17
4.1 0.27
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
PR
O
O
F
Plant Soil
Fig. 5 The dominant N form of uptake by three different plant species in specific depths in temperate grasslands of North China
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567Q7
568
569
570
571
572
Plant Soil
602
Q8 603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
References
PR
O
O
F
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
Plant Soil
without assistance from other organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 105(11):45244529
Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Visser J, Lonhienne TGA, Schmidt S
(2012) Past, present and future of organic nutrients. Plant
Soil 359(12):118
Pruden G, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1985) The measurement of
15
N in soil and plant material. Fert Res 6(3):205218
Raab TK, Lipson DA, Monson RK (1999) Soil amino acid utilization among species of the cyperaceae: plant and soil processes. Ecology 80:24082419
Rosswall T (1982) Microbiological regulation of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. Plant Soil 67:1534
Schimel JP, Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges
of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591602
Schimel JP, Chapin FS (1996) Tundra plant uptake of amino acid
and NH4+ nitrogen in situ: plants complete well for amino
acid N. Ecology 77:21422147
Soil Survey Staff (1987) Keys to soil taxonomy, 3rd edn. Cornell
University, New York
Song MH, Xu XL, Hu QW, Tian YQ, Ouyang H, Zhou CP (2007)
Interactions of plant species mediated plant competition for
inorganic nitrogen with soil microorganisms in an alpine
meadow. Plant Soil 297:127137
Sorensen PL, Michelsen A, Jonasson S (2008) Ecosystem
partitioning of 15N-glycine after long-term climate and
nutrient manipulations, plant clipping and addition of
labile carbon in a subarctic heath tundra. Soil Biol Biochem
40:23442350
Vitousek P, Howarth R (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in
the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87115
Wang WY, Ma YG, Xu J, Wang HC, Zhu JF, Zhou HK (2012) The
uptake diversity of soil nitrogen nutrients by main plant
species in Kobresia humilis alpine meadow on the QinghaiTibet plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 55:16881695
Weigelt A, Bol R, Bardgett RD (2005) Preferential uptake of soil
nitrogen forms by grassland plant species. Oecologia 142:
627635
Werth M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) 13C fractionation at the rootmicroorganisms-soil interface: a review and outlook for
partitioning studies. Soil Biol Biochem 42(9):13721384
Wilkinson A, Hill PW, Farrar JF, Jones DL, Bardgett RD (2014)
Rapid microbial uptake and mineralization of amino acids
and peptides along a grassland productivity gradient. Soil
Biol Biochem 72:7583
Wilkinson A, Hill PW, Vaieretti MV, Farrar JF, Jones DL, Bardgett
RD (2015) Challenging the paradigm of nitrogen cycling: no
evidence of in situ resource partitioning by coexisting plant
species in grasslands of contrasting fertility. Ecol Evol 5(2):
275287
Wu HH, Dannenmann M, Fanselow N, Wolf B, Yao ZS, Wu X,
Brggemann N, Zheng XH, Han XG, Dittert K, ButterbachBahl K (2011) Feedback of grazing on gross rates of N
mineralization and inorganic N partitioning in steppe soils
of inner Mongolia. Plant Soil 340:127139
Wu JR, Ma HC, Xu XL, Qiao N (2013) Mycorrhizas alter nitrogen
acquisition pattern of a soil dwelling orchid (Cymbidium
goeringii): evidence from a short-term 15N experiment. Ann
Bot 111:11811187
Xu XL, Ouyang H, Cao GM, Richter A, Wanek W, Kuzyakov Y
(2011a) Dominant plant species shift their nitrogen uptake
PR
O
O
F
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
Plant Soil
Artemisia frigida. J Inn Mongolia Inst Agric Anim Husb
20:17
Zhang YH, He NP, Zhang GM, Huang JH, Wang QB, Pan QM,
Han XG (2013) Ammonia emissions from soil under sheep
grazing in inner Mongolian grasslands of China. J Arid Land
5:155165
Zhu WX, Carreiro MM (2004) Temporal and spatial variations in
nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems
along an urban rural gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 36:267278
Zogg GP, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (2000) Microbial
immobilization and the retention of anthropogenic nitrate in
a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 81:18581866
PR
O
O
F
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
830
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
AUTHOR QUERIES
AUTHOR PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUERIES.
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
F
Q1. Ref. "Bardgett et al. 2005" is cited in the body but its bibliographic information is missing.
Kindly provide its bibliographic information in the list.
Q2. Ref. "Hodge et al. 1999" is cited in the body but its bibliographic information is missing.
Kindly provide its bibliographic information in the list.
Q3. Ref. "Jones et al. 2004" is cited in the body but its bibliographic information is missing.
Kindly provide its bibliographic information in the list.
Q4. Ref. "Xu et al. 2006" is cited in the body but its bibliographic information is missing. Kindly
provide its bibliographic information in the list.
Q5. The citation Hertenberger et al. 2004 has been changed to Hertenberger and Wanek,
2004 to match the author name/date in the reference list. Please check if the change is fine in
this occurrence and modify the subsequent occurrences, if necessary.
Q6. The citation Huang et al. 2008 has been changed to Huang et al., 2009 to match the
author name/date in the reference list. Please check if the change is fine in this occurrence and
modify the subsequent occurrences, if necessary.
Q7. Ref. "Miller et al. 2007" is cited in the body but its bibliographic information is missing.
Kindly provide its bibliographic information in the list.
Q8. Reference [Jacob & Leuschner, 2014] was provided in the reference list; however, this was
not mentioned or cited in the manuscript. As a rule, all references given in the list of
references should be cited in the main body. Please provide its citation in the body text.