Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DOI 10.1007/s00276-006-0140-x
O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E
Received: 4 April 2006 / Accepted: 3 July 2006 / Published online: 26 August 2006
Springer-Verlag 2006
Abstract
Aim The aim of this work was to design an accurate
3D digital model of the humerus and rotator cuff
muscles. This model was then used to study strain
distribution in humeral tubercles according to bone
density.
Materials and methods The geometry of bone and
muscle structures was reproduced using SURFDRIVER software, based on anatomical sections, CT scans
and MRI images from the Visible Human Project
image library. The contours were transferred to
PATRAN software to rebuild volumes and mesh
them. Calculations of strains and their distribution
were performed using NASTRAN software. All the
elements were considered to be isotropes.
Results The study of the distribution of stress
magnitude according to the type of bone modeled,
shows that some stresses in cortical bone are greater
than those in cancellous bone and are also greater in
old bone, implying more deformation in old bone at
constant force. This study also shows that stresses do
not penetrate deeply into cancellous tissue.
Conclusion Observing the simulation results led
understanding of the pathology of certain fractures of
123
582
Meshing
The contours obtained were transferred to MSC
PATRAN v7.5 (MCS Software Corporation, Santa
Ana, CA, USA) to be assembled individually and thus
reconstruct the volume of each element before meshing them. Meshing or discretizing all the elements
constituting the reconstructed humerus, was carried
out with 8 node brick type isoparametric threedimensional elements or HEX8 [7, 8], creating 221,626
elements (Fig. 3). This type of element produced good
results convergence, with acceptable computing times.
It was during the meshing stage that the x, y, z baseline
was set up; it will be retained throughout the experiments so that results can be read clearly.
Mechanical characteristics of different elements
123
583
Table 1 Youngs modulus and Poissons coefficient applied to the different elements in the model
Youngs modulus
Poissons coefficient
Cancellous bone
[10, 12, 19]
Sub-chondral bone
[5, 14, 21]
Young
bone
Old
bone
Young
bone
Old
bone
Young
bone
Old
bone
Young
bone
Old
bone
16 GPa
0.3
12 GPa
0.3
550 MPa
0.3
250 MPa
0.3
3.5 GPa
0.3
3.5 GPa
0.3
2 MPa
0.3
2 MPa
0.3
Youngs modulus are obtained from specific studies of cortical and cancellous bone of the upper end of the humerus
123
584
Results
Abduction positions
Fig. 5 The muscular forces were applied at multiple nodes of the
tubercles
Table 2 The muscular forces applied to each muscle for an abduction position of 10 and 90 [26]
10 of abduction
90 of abduction
123
Deltoideus
Subscapularis
Supraspinatus
Infraspinatus/teres minor
4.5 N
116 N
2.5 N
70 N
1N
25 N
2N
60 N
585
by resolution of linear systems. From these displacements, deformations are obtained by derivation. The
stresses are then evaluated from the deformations
using a matrix characteristic of the structural material.
123
586
123
Conclusion
The simulations performed in this study led to the
development of an anatomically accurate digital model
of the humerus, used to understand, display and map the
distribution of stresses in the major and minor humeral
tubercles generated by muscle tendons in the rotator
cuff muscles during abduction. The results obtained
were used to validate the model, by comparing them
with published data, and to envisage more complex
simulations. We can now incorporate prosthetic parts
into the model to determine the maximum forces the
material can withstand without risk of rupture, and
complete the model with the scapula to evaluate the
distribution and amplitude of stresses in the joint contact
zone. Finally, this study demonstrates that, under
physiological load on the rotator cuff, maximum stresses
are observed at 90 abduction. The amplitude and distribution of stresses is influenced mainly by bone quality.
References
1. Anglin C, Tolhurst P, Wyss U, Pichora D (1999) Glenoid
cancellous bone strength and modulus. J Biomech 32:1091
1097
2. Barea C (1998) Modelisation 3D par la methode des elements finis dune articulation scapulo-humerale. Application
a` letude des contraintes sur une epaule saine et avec differents types de gle`nes prothetiques. Thesis. Universite Paul
Sabatier, Toulouse
587
15. Karlsson D, Peterson B (1992) Towards a model for force
predictions in the human shoulder. J Biomech 25:189199
16. Lacroix D, Prendergast P (1997) Stress analysis of glenoid
component designs for shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech
Eng 211:467474
17. Lanyon L, Hampson W, Goodship A, Shan J (1975) Bone
deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to
the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand 46:256268
18. Maldonado Z, Seebeck J, Heller M, Brandt D, Hepp P, Lill
H, Duda G (2003) Straining of the intact and fractured
proximal humerus under physiological-like loading. J Biomech 36:18651873
19. Mansat P (1996) Proprietes mecaniques osseuse de la gle`ne.
Application a` la modelisation tridimensionnelle par la
methode des elements finis. Thesis. Universite Paul Sabatier,
Toulouse
20. Orr T, Carter D, Schurman D (1988) Stress analyses of glenoid component designs. Clin Orthop 232:217224
21. Pedersen D, Crowninshield R, Brand R, Johnston R (1982)
An axisymetric model of acetabular components in total hip
arthroplasty. J Biomech 15:305315
22. Stone K, Grabowski J, Cofield R, Morrey B, An K (1999)
Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:151158
23. Van der Helm F (1994) Analysis of the kinematic and
dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech
27:527550
24. Van der Helm F (1994) A finite element musculoskeletal
model of the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 27:551569
25. Van der Helm F, Veenbaas R (1991) Modelling the
mechanical effect of muscles with large attachment sites:
application to the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 21:1151
1163
26. Wuelker N, Wirth CJ, Plitz W, Roetman B (1995) A dynamic
shoulder model: reliability testing and muscle force study.
J Biomech 28:489499
123