Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
This document presents an example of the design of a hitched (or slab keyed into rock) type of plug.
The approach presented follows the Bulkhead & Dams for Underground Mines Design Guidelines published by the
Ontario Ministry of Labour, Occupational Health and Safety Branch (1995).
Hypothetical Case:
A mine would like to build a hitched plug to close the access to the 130 haulage portal (Elev. 130 m) as part of the
general closure plan for the mine. The plug will be required to retain water after mine closure and the static
groundwater level is estimated to be at Elev. 465 m. For reference purposes,
Figure 1 shows a typical cross-section of a hitched plug.
Chemical analysis of the water indicated that it has a ph at approximately 7 and does not contain suspended solid.
Any leakage water from the plug will not be used for domestic purposes.
The drift is 3.7 m wide and 3.4 m high at the planned plug location and the rock mass of granite has been classified as
Fair quality through rock mass characterization.
The specifications for concrete and formwork presented in the course should be used.
Homogneos Rock
The bearing capacity of rock that is homogeneous is dependent upon the geometry of the rock surface that is
undergoing loading, the unit weight of the rock, the cohesion of the rock and the internal angle of friction of the rock.
Ordinarily, homogeneous rock has a compressive strength that is higher than that of concrete. Consequently, the
bearing capacity of homogeneous rock in an anchor channel is not likely to be exceeded by the load transferred to it
from a concrete bulkhead.
For uniform loading on an area of rock having a width W, the bearing capacity is given as:
Where: = the unit weight of the rock
c = the cohesion of the rock
And
Nand Nc are bearing capacity factors
Nc = (Nq - 1) cot
N= 1.5 (Nq - 1) tan
Nq = e tantan2 (/4 + / 2)
= the angle of friction of the rock
Cohesion and friction angle values for commonly encountered rock types are:
Discontinuous Rock
Rock in mining environments is seldom homogeneous and is usually characterized by blast induced fractures and
geologic features such as joints, bedding planes or faults. Discontinuities ordinarily adversely influence the bearing
capacity of the rock. Notwithstanding its compressive strength, the bearing capacity of a rock mass that is personified
by discontinuities can be significantly lower than that of a homogeneous rock mass composed of the same rock type.
In discontinuous rock the potential failure mechanism from bearing stress can be somewhat different from that
resulting from excess bearing stress in homogeneous rock. The spacing, orientation and opening size of
discontinuities in a rock mass will dictate how it responds to bearing pressures. In rock masses that are typified by
discontinuities that are open, have a spacing that is less than the width over which the bearing load is applied and are
oriented sub-parallel to the direction of the applied load, the load is essentially supported by unconfined columns of
rock. The bearing capacity of such rock masses is approximately equal to the sum of the strengths of the individual
rock columns, provided that each column has the same strength and rigidity.
For bulkhead anchor channels that are excavated in jointed or fractured rock, it is crucial that the rock mass is
carefully mapped to assess what influences, if any, the rock mass discontinuities will have on its bearing capacity. The
outcome of such mapping endeavors may reveal the necessity to adjust the bearing capacity as presented before for
homogenous rock (Section 2.1).
For explanation on rock mass characterization and the derivation of rock strength parameters, refer to
Appendix B Rock Mass Characterization of the Plug Design Guidelines.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The Bulkhead Design Guidelines prepared by the Ontario Ministry of Labour (1995) includes a section on plug design
considerations, as presented in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. This outlines the basis for plug design requirements, design
criteria followed, typical layout of a plug, and coefficients used for design.
All are referenced to the design calculations of Section 4.0.
Notes:
1. Anchorage distance of h/2 is based on anchorage in sound rock with an allowable bearing pressure of 3800 kPa. If
rock is fractured or allowable bearing is less than 3800 kPa, then appropriate adjustment to anchorage depth is
required.
2. Concrete cover = 75 mm 12 mm.
3. For rectangular bulkheads, place reinforcement parallel to short dimension (l a) on the outermost layer.
4. For bulkheads that may be loaded from either side, place reinforcement, as indicated in tables, on both sides.
5. Minimum bar spacing s = Bar dia. (db) + largest of:
- 25 mm; or
- db; or
- 1.33 x max. size aggregate.
3.4 Coefficients and Notations Used in Design
The following are notations used in the design calculations of Section 4.0:
An Effective tension area of concrete surrounding the flexural tension.
Reinforcement and having the same centroid as that.
Reinforcement, divided by number of bars, mm2h.
As
D
L
Q
T
The following section provides details related to the calculation of factored loads, and the ultimate requirements for
plug design, using the hypothetical case presented in Section 1.0. These calculations are based on the Bulkhead
Design Guidelines from the Ontario Ministry of Labour (1995).
Refer to Section 3.4 for an itemized list of notations used in the following calculations.
w = H x rw x g = 3287 kN/m2
Where, g = 9.81 m/s2
rw = 1000 kg/m3, (density of water)
4.2 Design Coefficients
The following are design coefficients related to the bulkhead geometrical requirements, and design layout:
Importance factor (l ):
l = 1.0 (CSA g.2.6)
Resistance factor (fc):
fc = 0.60 (CAN g.3.2)
Design coefficient (bc):
bc = 1.088 (Section 4.2)
Strength of concrete (fc):
(fc)0.5 = (30)0.5 = 5.477
where fc is expressed in MPa
Evaluating Formula (1):
Vc = (1 + 2 / bc) 0.2 l fc (fc)0.5 bo d,
= (1+2 / 1.088) 0.2 x 1.0 x 0.60 x 5.477 x bo d
= 1.8654 bo d
Formula (1) cannot be greater than Formula (2).
4.5 Evaluating Formula (2):
Vc = 0.4 l fc (fc)0.5 bo d
= 0.4 x 1.0 x 0.6 x 5.477 bo d
= 1.3145 bo d
Which is less than Vc in Formula (1)
Therefore, use Vc in Formula (2) & substitute (14200 4d) for bo:
Vc = 1.3145 (14200 4d) d
= 18665.9 d 5.258 d2 (N)
= 18.6659 d - 0.005258 d2 (kN) Formula (3)
4.6 Factored Shear Loads, Vf
The following equations consider the applied shear loads on the bulkhead:
Factored shear load (Vf) :
Vf = Wf (la d) (lb d)
= 4931 (3.400 0.001 d) (3.700 0.001 d) (kN)
= 4931 (12.58 0.0034 d 0.0037 d + 0.000001 d2) (kN)
= 0.004931 d2 35.0101 d + 62031.98 (kN)
Where, Wf = total factored load = 4931 (kN) (Section 4.3)
4.7 Factored Thickness of Bulkhead, d
The following equations consider the factored thickness of the bulkhead based on the factored shear resistance and
factored shear load.
Let:
area, (As):
As = (Mf x 106) / (0.90 fs fy d) (CSA 9.3.3)
Where, Mf = 2457 kN.m per metre width
d = 1800 mm
For fs = 0.85, fy = 400 MPa
Therefore, As = (2457 x 106) / (306 x 1800)
= 4461 mm2 / m
Consider two steel layers of 30M at 200 mm:
As = 2 [(30/2)2] / 0.200
= 7068 mm2 / m
Ratio of non-prestressed tension reinforcement, (r):
r = As / (b d)
Where b = 1000 mm unit width
r = 7068 / (1000 x 1800),
= 0.003927
4.10 Factored Moment Resistance (Short Side), Mr
The following formulae consider the factored moment resistance acting across the short side of the bulkhead. Refer to
CPCA Concrete Design Handbook 2.7 and CSA Appendix B3.
Factored moment resistance, (Mr):
Preliminary:
= 0.003927 (Section 4.8)
1. Temp. & shrinkage reinforcing.
min = 0.0020,
Since min, OK
2. Max. Allowable steel ratio max
(to ensure ductile failure)
max = (c / s) [(0.85 x fc x 1 x 600) / fy (600 + fy)]
Where, fc = 30, 1 = 0.85
max = (0.60 / 0.85) [(0.85 x 30 x 0.85 x 600) / 400 (600 + 400)]
= 0.02295,
Since max, OK
3. Minimum Reinforcing for Flexure
min = 1.4 / fy or 1.33 x reqd for flexure (CSA 10.5)
= 1.4 / 400 = 0.0035,
Since min, OK
Therefore initial reinforcing steel area estimation (Section 4.8) of two layers of 30 M at 200
4.13 Reinforcement Steel Area for Preliminary Calculations (Long Side)
The following formulae are the second iteration for considering the reinforcement steel area which is required for
preliminary calculations. The bulkhead reinforcing steel requirements for moments acting along the long side of the
bulkhead are considered. These formulae refer to the CPCA Concrete
Design Handbook 2.9.
Preliminary:
= 0.00314 (Section 4.12)
1. Temp. & shrinkage reinforcing.
min = 0.0020,
Since min, OK
2. Max. Allowable steel ratio max
(To ensure ductile failure)
max = (c / s) [(0.85 x fc x 1 x 600) / fy (600 + fy)]
Where, fc = 30, 1 = 0.85
= 0.02295
Since max, OK
3. Minimum Reinforcing for Flexure
min = 1.4 / fy or 1.33 x reqd for flexure (CSA 10.5)
= 1.33x As/ (b x d)
= 1.33 x 3738/ (1000 x 1800)
= 0.0028
Since min, OK
Therefore initial reinforcing steel area estimation (Section 4.8) of two layers of 30 M at 250 mm are satisfactory. (A s =
5655 mm2 /m)
s = 30 mm + 46.55 mm
= 76.55 mm, use 80 mm
Slab Thickness, (h):
h = d + s / 2 + dc + db / 2
Where, d = 1800 mm (effective depth)
dc = 75 mm (concrete cover to bar)
h = 1800 + 80 / 2 + 75 + 30 / 2
= 1930 mm
4.17 Anchorage in Rock
The following formulae consider the anchorage depth of the bulkhead into the rock based on the bulkhead geometry
and allowable bearing capacity of the rock.
ah2 + bh + c = 0
h = (-b 6 (b2 4ac)0.5) / (2a)
= (-7.1 6 (50.41 + 43.5296)0.5) / 2
= (-7.1 6 9.6922) / 2
= 1.30 m
Therefore, anchorage required = h/2 = 1.30 / 2 = 0.65 m
For additional factor of safety:
Anchorage required = h / 2, let h = d, 1800 / 2 = 900 mm = 0.90 m
4.18 Bearing on Concrete
The following formulae consider the allowable bearing pressure of the concrete slab compared to the bearing pressure
of the live load.
At support:
Figure D2 Results of the bulkhead design calculations for an opening 3400mm x 3700mm.