Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Berk
TABLE 1
Salient Characteristics of 12 Sources of Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness
Source of Evidence
Type of Measure(s) Who Provides Evidence
Who Uses Evidence
Student Ratings
Rating Scale
Peer Ratings
Rating Scale
Self-Evaluation
Rating Scale
Videos
Rating Scale
Student Interviews
Questionnaires
Alumni Ratings
Rating Scale
Employer Ratings
Rating Scale
Administrator Ratings
Rating Scale
Teaching Scholarship
Judgmental Review
Teaching Awards
Judgmental Review
Learning Outcomes
Tests, Projects, Simulations
Teaching Portfolio
Most of the above
1
F = formative, S = summative, P = program
49
Students
Peers
Instructors
Instructors/Peers
Students
Graduates
Graduates Employers
Administrators
Instructors
Instructors
Students
Instructors, Students, Peers
Instructors/Administrators
Instructors
Instructors/Administrators
Instructors/Peers
Instructors/Administrators
Instructors/Administrators
Instructors/Administrators
Administrators
Administrators
Faculty Committees/Administrators
Instructors/Curriculum Committees
Promotions Committees
Type of Decision1
F/S/P
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S/P
P
S
S
S
F/P
S
Berk
50
Berk
51
Berk
52
Berk
53
Berk
54
Berk
55
Berk
56
Berk
9.
57
Berk
58
Berk
59
Berk
60
Berk
Seldin, P. (1980).
Successful faculty evaluation
programs: A practical guide to improvedfaculty
performance and promotion/tenure decisions.
Crugers, NY: Coventry Press.
Seldin, P. (1998, February). The teaching portfolio.
Paper presented for the American Council on
Education, Department Chairs Seminar, San Diego,
CA.
Seldin, P. (1999a). Current practices good and bad
nationally. In P. Seldin & Associates (Eds.),
Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A
practical guide to improved faculty performance
and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 124).
Bolton, MA: Anker.
Seldin, P. (1999b). Self-evaluation: What works?
What doesnt? In P. Seldin & Associates (Eds.),
Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A
practical guide to improved faculty performance
and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 97115).
Bolton, MA: Anker.
Seldin, P. (2004). The teaching portfolio (3rd ed.).
Bolton, MA: Anker.
Seldin, P., Annis, L., & Zubizarreta, J. (1995).
Answers to common questions about the teaching
portfolio.
Journal on Excellence in College
Teaching, 6(1), 5764.
Seldin, P., & Associates (Eds.). (1999). Changing
practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide
to
improve
faculty
performance
and
promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Seppanen, L. J. (1995). Linkages to the world of
employment.
In P. T. Ewell (Ed.), Student
tracking: New techniques, new demands. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shariff, S. H. (1999). Students quality control circle:
A case study on students participation in the
quality of control circles at the Facility of Business
and Management. Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 24, 141146.
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M.
(2000). The validity of student evaluation of
teaching in higher education: Love me, love my
lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 25(4), 397405.
Shore, B. M. (1975). Moving beyond the course
evaluation questionnaire in evaluating university
teaching CAUT Bulletin, 23(4), 710.
Shore, B. M., & Associates. (1980). The teaching
dossier: A guide to its preparation and use.
Ottawa:
Canadian Association of University
Teachers.
Shore, B. M., & Associates. (1986). The teaching
dossier: A guide to its preparation and use (rev.
ed.). Ottawa: Canadian Association of University
Teachers.
61
Shulman, L. S. (1998).
Course anatomy:
The
dissection and analysis of knowledge through
teaching. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course
portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching
to advance practice and improve student learning.
Washington, DC:
American Association for
Higher Education.
Siegel, A. I. (1986). Performance tests. In R. A. Berk
(Ed.), Performance assessment: Methods and
applications (pp. 121142).
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Soderberg, L.O. (1986). A credible model: Evaluating
classroom teaching in higher education.
Instructional Evaluation, 8, 1327.
Sojka, J., Gupta, A. K., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R.
(2002). Student and faculty perceptions of student
evaluations of teaching. College Teaching, 50(2),
4449.
Sorey, K. E. (1968). A study of the distinguishing
characteristics of college faculty who are superior
in regard to the teaching function. Dissertation
Abstracts, 28(12-A), 4916.
Sproule, R. (2002).
The under-determination of
instructor performance by data from the student
evaluation of teaching. Economics of Education
Review, 21(3), 287295.
Theall, M., Abrami, P. C., & Mets, L. A. (Eds.).
(2001). The student ratings debate: Are they valid?
How can we best use them? (New Directions for
Institutional Research, No. 109). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Theall, M., & Franklin, J. L. (1990). Student ratings in
the context of complex evaluation systems. In M.
Theall & J. L. Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of
instruction: Issues for improving practice (New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 43).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Theall, M., & Franklin, J. L. (2001). Looking for bias
in all the wrong places: A search for truth or a
witch hunt in student ratings of instruction? In M.
Theall, P. C., Abrami, & L. A. Mets (Eds.), The
student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can
we best use them?
(New Directions for
Institutional Research, No. 109) (pp. 4556). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Trinkaus, J., (2002). Students course and faculty
evaluations: An informal look. Psychological
Reports, 91, 988.
US Department of Education. (1991, Winter).
Assessing teaching performance. The Department
Chair: A Newsletter for Academic Administrators,
2(3), 2.
Vinson, M. N. (1996). The pros and cons of 360degree feedback: Making it work. Training and
Development, 50(4), 1112.
Berk
62