Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Department
FPSE
Economics
Medical
School
Va
Arts/Letters
lid
Technical
Department
s
Total
4,7
4,7
67,1
15
8,8
8,8
75,9
41
24,1
24,1
100,0
170
100,0
100,0
III.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
1. Motivational questionnaire - Subjects answers to the
motivational questionnaire are represented by the
frequencies shown in the pie charts.
Frequency tables regarding the approval of college courses
or curriculum reflect a somehow satisfied percentage of
35.3%, while 30.6% were located in the satisfied area,
and 22.5% of subjects came under the very satisfied area
(Pie chart 1).
Pie chart 1
Page | 237
Yes
Somewhat Satisfied
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Pie chart 2
Pie Chart 5
No/Not really
Somewhat
Somewhat more
Very much
Yes
No/I do not know
Yes
Somewhat more
A lot
No/I do not
know
Yes
No/I do not know
Page | 239
No/Not really
Somewhat
Somewhat more
Very much
Histogram 2
r
calculat
ed
Self Esteem
.52*
r calculated 95%
CI
Low
Limit
.40
High
Limit
sup.
.65
r
correcte
d
.62*
Page | 240
.57*
*
REFERENCES
[1] Bell, L. G., & Bell, D. C. (2005). Family dynamics in
adolescence affect midlife well-being. Journal of
family psychology, 19(2), 198.
[2] Church, E. (1994). The role of autonomy in adolescent
psychotherapy.Psychotherapy:
Theory,
Research,
Practice, Training, 31(1), 101.
[3] Debesse, M. (1970). Child Psychology from birth to
teenager. Editura Didactic i Pedagogic, Bucharest
[4] Fuligni, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parentchild relationships and early adolescents' orientation
toward peers. Developmental psychology, 29(4), 622.
[5] Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The
relationship between self and achievement/performance
measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123142.
[6] Helgeson, V.S. (1994), Relation of agency and
communication to well-being: Evidence and potential
explanations, Psychological Bulletin, 116, pp. 412-428.
[7] Krevans, J., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Parents' use of
inductive discipline: Relations to children's empathy
and prosocial behavior. Child development,67(6),
3263-3277.
[8] Mohammad Aryana, 2010. Relationship Between Selfesteem and Academic Achievement Amongst PreUniversity Students. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10:
2474-2477.
[9] Petersen, A. C. (1988). Adolescent development.
Annual review of psychology,39(1), 583-607.
[10] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., &
McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive
validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning
Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 53, 801-813.
[11] Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM,
Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The academic motivation
scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation
in education. Educ Psychol Meas 52: 10031017, 1992.
[12] Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M.
(1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The
role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal
setting.American educational research journal, 29(3),
663-676.
[13] Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational
development. Self-efficacy in changing societies, 202231.
Page | 241