Você está na página 1de 12

Linear Regression with Multiple Regressors

1-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Omitted Variable Bias

Omitting relevant factors from an ordinary least squares (OLS)


regression can produce misleading or biased results. Omitted
variable bias is present when two conditions are met:
The omitted variable is correlated with the movement of the

independent variable in the model


The omitted variable is a determinant of the dependent

variable.
The issue of omitted variable bias occurs regardless of the size of
the sample.

2-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

3-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Multiple Regression Basics


The general multiple linear regression model is:

Yi =b0 +b1X1i +b2 X2i +...+bk Xki +ei


ordinary least squares (OLS)

Minimize:

ei Yi Y i
2

Yi (b0 b1 X 1i b2 X 2i ... bk X ki )

4-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Coefficient of Determination, R2
R2 is calculated the same way as in simple linear regression.
variance
explained variance
TSS-SSR
ESS
R 2 = total variancetotal- unexplained
=
=
=
variance
TSS
total variance
TSS

Adjusted R2
Unfortunately, R2 by itself may not be a reliable measure of the explanatory power of the
multiple regression model. This is because R2 almost always increases as independent
variables are added to the model, even if the marginal contribution of the new variables is
not statistically significant. Consequently, a relatively high R2 may reflect the impact of a
large set of independent variables rather than how well the set explains the dependent
variable. This problem is often referred to as overestimating the regression. To overcome
the problem of overestimating the impact of additional variables on the explanatory
power of a regression model, many researchers recommend adjusting R2 for the number
of independent variables. The adjusted R2 value is expressed as:
n-1
R a2 =1- n-k-1
(1-R 2 )
5-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Example
Example: Calculating R2 and adjusted R2
An analyst run a regression of monthly value-stock returns on five independent
variables over 60 months. The total sum of squares for the regression is 460, and
the sum of squared errors is 170. Calculate the R2 and adjusted R2 .
Answer:

R2

460 170
460

0.630 63.0%

Ra2 1 [( 6060511 ) (1 0.63)] 0.596 59.6%


The R2 of 63% suggests that the five independent variables together explain 63%
of the variance in monthly value-stock returns .

6-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Example

Example: Interpreting adjusted R2


Suppose the analyst now adds four more independent variable to the regression,
and the R2 increases to 65.0%. Identify which model the analyst would most
likely prefer .

Answer:
With nine independent variables, even though the R2 has increased from 63% to
65%, the adjusted R2 has decreased from 59.6% to 58.7%

Ra2 1 [( 6060911 ) (1 0.65)] 0.587 58.7%


The analyst would prefer the first model because the adjusted R2 is higher and
the model has five independent variables as opposed to nine.

7-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

201405
QUESTIONS 43 AND 44 REFER TO THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
A bank analyst run an ordinary least squares regression of the daily returns of the stock
on the daily returns on the S&P 500 index using the last 750 trading days of data. The
regression results are summarized in the following tables:
Predictor

Coefficient

Standard Error

t-statistic

p-value

Constant

0.0561

0.00294

19.09710

0.00000

Return on the S&P 500

1.2054

0.00298

404.25225

0.00000

R2=87.86%
Analysis of Variance
Source

Degree of Freedom

Sum of Squares

Mean Square

Regression

11.43939

11.43939

Residual Error

749

0.05425

0.00007

Total

750

0.44677

8-12

F-statistic

p-value

163419.87971

0.00000

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

201405

9-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Detecting Multicollinearity()
The most common way to detect multicollinearity is the situation where t-tests indicate
that none of the individual coefficients is significantly different than zero, while the R2 is
high.
Example:
Bob Watson runs a regression of mutual fund returns on average P/B, average P/E, and
average market capitalization, with the following results:
Variable
Average P/B
Average P/E
Market Cap
R2

Coefficient
3.52
2.78
4.03
89.60%

p-Value
0.15
0.21
0.11

Determine whether or not multicollinearity is a problem in this regression .


Answer
The R2 is high, which suggest that the three variables as a group do an excellent job of
explaining the variation in mutual fund returns. However, none of the independent
variables individually is statistically significant to any reasonable degree, since the pvalues are larger than 10% This is a classic indication of multicollinearity.
10-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

11-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

FRM

12-12

FRMFinancial Risk Manager

Você também pode gostar