Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT.................................................................................3
1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................4
2 PROBLEM DEFINITION............................................................5
2.1 INCONSISTENCY IN CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES...................................5
2.2 REASONS COSTS VARY...........................................................................5
2.3 PROBLEMS ARISING WITH LACK OF FISNANCIAL CONTROL..............................5
2.4 CASH FLOW: A MAJOR ISSUE.............................................................6
2.5 EFFECTS OF CONSTRUCTION DELAYS........................................................6
2.6 DELAY CAUSES..................................................................................... 6
2.7 COSTS OF DELAYS................................................................................. 6
3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF PROJECT........................................7
3.1 OBJECTIVES:........................................................................................ 7
3.1.1 Identify and assess the impacts of the factors...........................7
3.1.2 Develop comprehensive guidelines............................................7
3.1.3 Assess how we can improve the project development............7
3.2 TYPES OF COST SAVING MATERIALS..........................................................8
4 LITERATURE REVIEW..............................................................9
4.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COST AND QUALITY.............................................9
4.1.1 Cost............................................................................................ 9
4.1.2 Quality........................................................................................ 9
4.2 FACTORS AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATION-.............................10
4.3 COST EFFECTIVE APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES ARE-...................................10
4.3.1 Foundation costs-.....................................................................11
4.3.2 Arch foundation-.......................................................................12
4.3.3 Plinth........................................................................................ 12
4.3.4 Walls......................................................................................... 12
4.3.5 Brick jail.................................................................................... 13
4.3.6 Roofs........................................................................................ 15
4.3.7 Roofs/ intermediate slabs.........................................................15
4.3.8 Ferro cement channel/shell unit...............................................15
4.3.9 Jack arch roof/floor...................................................................16
4.3.10 Filler slab-technique................................................................16
4.3.11 The mechanism......................................................................17
4.4 BENEFITS-......................................................................................... 17
4.4.1 Saving on cost..........................................................................17
4.4.2 Thermal insulation-...................................................................17
4.4.3 Patterned ceilings-....................................................................18
4.4.4 Spanning elements for openings..............................................18
4.5 DOOR CUM WINDOW FRAMES................................................................18
4.6 DOORS AND WINDOWS
..19
4.7 LINTELS............................................................................................ 19
4.8 OPENING IN THE FORM OF ARCH WITH LOCAL MATERIAL-.............................19
4.9 DOOR PANELS.................................................................................... 19
4.10 FINISHING WORK-............................................................................. 20
5 METHODOLOGY...................................................................20
6 DATA COLLECTION...............................................................22
7 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................23
7.1 ARCH FOOTING/FOUNDATION.................................................................23
2
7.2 RAT TRAP BOND.................................................................................. 24
7.2.1 ADVANTAGES OF USING RAT TRAP BOND.................................24
7.3 FILLER SLAB ROOFING.........................................................................24
8 CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................25
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
Abstract
Introduction
Cost effective housing is a relative concept and has more to do with budgeting and seeks to reduce
construction cost through better management, appropriate use of local materials, skills and
technology but without sacrificing the performance and structure life. It should be noted that low
cost housings are not houses which constructed by cheap building materials of substandard quality.
A low cost house is designed and constructed as any other house with regard to foundation,
structure and strength.
In this report several traditional cost of quality theories are applied, compared, and contrasted as
they relate to the construction industry; particularly conforming and nonconforming quality costs.
Failure to face quality cost issues is certainly not due to its lack of importance. The significance of
quality costs versus other costs incurred on a construction project is evident from various research
studies.
Low cost housing is a relative concept and has more to do with budgeting and seeks to reduces
construction cost trough better management, appropriate use of local materials, skills and
technology without sacrificing strength and life of structure. Furthermore, low cost housing can be
considered affordable for low- and moderate-income earners if household can acquire a housing
unit...Economy is also achieved by postponing finishing and implementing low cost housing
technologies in phases..
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
2
2.1
Problem Definition
Inconsistency in Construction Cost Estimates
A cost estimate approximates a projects probable cost. Cost estimates are prepared at concept stage,
refined throughout the project-preparation process, and updated during implementation . The cost
estimate should identify those principal cost components needed to support effective project
management.
2.2
The availability and relative supply and demand of materials will affect their direct purchase price.
Over the years, shortages have occurred in structural steel, portland cement, precast concrete,
gypsum products, and glass and glazing. Some trades may be in short supply as well. The issue is to
be careful and aware of potential material and labor shortages. Availability may also affect the lead
time required for delivery and shipping and handling costs, especially in remote areas, and can
affect the cost of materials. A variety of sales taxes, import/export duties, and other special fees
indirectly affect the cost of material. Installation costs vary according to an even more complex
series of relationships. Direct labor wages can vary from location to location by 10 to 15 percent,
and sometimes as much as 50 percent.. Taxes and insurance affect labor costs. Certain trades, such
as demolition, carry very high insurance premiums because of the risks associated with the work
6
and the relative safety record of the contractor. Conditions of the work, particularly with renovation,
affect productivity relative to access and egress, lay-down/staging areas, and dust, dirt, and general
job cleanup requirements, as well as the space available to conduct business. Moreover sometimes
the techniques used on site for construction may differ the costing of a project. For example the
types of foundation used or materials used.
2.3
During the execution of a project, procedures for project control and record keeping become
indispensable tools to managers and other participants in the construction process. These tools serve
the dual purpose of recording the financial transactions that occur as well as giving managers an
indication of the progress and problems associated with a project. Project management activities
and functional concerns are intimately linked, yet the techniques used in many instances do not
facilitate comprehensive or integrated consideration of project activities. For example, schedule
information and cost accounts are usually kept separately. Failure is undesirable and avoidable and
it can be prevented by good cash flow management. Indeed, company failure has been widely
researched. Knowledge about business failure can be useful in providing guidance to entrepreneurs
who want to start a business. It indicates the risk factors in their industry and provides the benefit of
experience in risk management
2.4
During the recent years around 250,000 new businesses have been created every year. Many are
destined to fail within the first two years. One key reason is the lack of a viable business plan for
their operation . Four main deficiencies that are characteristic of failed companies are cash flow
forecasts, costing system, budgetary control, and asset valuation. Cash flow problems and shortage
of working capital can, in extreme circumstances, push efficient and profitable firms into
insolvency. It is also possible that a firm is pulled into insolvency by the failure of another firm.
There is a Domino Theory that may apply if a client becomes insolvent owing large sums of money
to the contractor, or if a main contractor fails owing cash to one or more regular subcontractors.
2.5
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
2.6
Delay Causes
Labor Strikes
Weather
Third Party
Plan Errors
Change Orders
Contractor Errors
Suspension of Work
Utilities
Differing Site Conditions
2.7
Costs of Delays
This research focuses only on activities carried out in the phases of the project development process
that precedes construction and is limited to qualitative assessment. The goal of this research is to
compare and contrast traditional cost theories as they relate to the construction industry.
3.1
Objectives:
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
Literature Review
4.1
4.1.1
Cost
Clients have been increasingly concerned with the overall profitability of projects and the
accountability of projects generally. Research to date has tended to focus on the technical
aspects of managing costs on construction projects in the attainment of client objectives.
4.1.2
Quality
To the client, quality may be defined as one of the components that contributes to the term
value for money. The goal is customer satisfaction. Furthermore, in order to achieve
successful project quality management three separate drivers to quality management must be
managed, namely:
1. Integration of the project team so as to have a single objective and a common culture
2. A customer focus for the team thereby facilitating the provision of products and services
that will meet the clients needs
10
4.2
Building Cost-The building construction cost can be divided into two parts namely:
Building material cost : 65 to 70 % & Labor cost : 65 to 70 %
Size-The smaller the project in terms of scope or the number of square feet, the more it will cost per
square foot.
Type-Different types of project have different levels of complexity and detail
Special Construction -Complexity can greatly increase the cost of the project. Renovation,
especially if it requires altering or moving structural components, can be costly because it
necessitates demolition as well as building. Special construction may also be necessary to shield
surrounding spaces from noise, fire and other hazards.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
4.3
Random rubble masonry in mud/cement mortar placed in excavation over thick sand bed.
Rubble pointing above ground level in stabilized cement mortar.
Use of lean cement concrete mix 1:8:16 for base with brick masonry in 1:6 cement mortar
footings.
Use of lean cement concrete mix as above for base and over burned bricks masonry in
cement lime mortar (1:2:12) footings.
Figure 2 - Foundation
12
4.3.1
Foundation costs-
Normally the foundation cost comes to about 10 to 15% of the total building .
It is recommended to adopt a foundation depth of 2 ft.(0.6m) for normal soil like gravely
soil, red soils etc.
In case of black cotton and other soft soils, it is recommend to use under ream pile
foundation which saves about 20 to 25% in cost over the conventional method of
construction.
4.3.2
Arch foundationThis type of foundation was used in olden times where in spread foundation is replaced by
inverted arch .
Advantage of this is-In soft soils that the depth of foundation can be greatly reduced;
disadvantage is that the end piers have to be specially strengthened by buttresses so as to
avoid the thrust to arch action tending to rapture the piers junction.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
4.3.3
Plinth
It is recommended to adopt 1 ft. height above ground level for the plinth and may be
constructed with a cement mortar of 1:6.
The plinth slab of 4 to 6 which is normally adopted can be avoided and in its place brick on
edge can be used for reducing the cost.
4.3.4
By adopting this procedure the cost of plinth foundation can be reduced by about 35 to 50%.
Walls
Brick work in 1:6 cement mortar using bricks from black cotton and inferior soil stabilized
with fly-ash.
Rat-trap bond brick work in 1:2:12 cement lime mortar/1:1.5:3 cement sand mortar.
14
Stabilized mud blocks masonry (4% cement or lime) in stabilized mud mortar.
While laying bricks, the manner in which they overlap is called the bond. The rat-trap bond is laid
by placing the bricks on their sides having a cavity of 100 mm, with alternate course of stretchers
and headers . The headers and stretchers are staggered in subsequent layers to give more strength to
the walls.
This technology has about 25% overall-saving on cost of a building of traditional 9"
construction. The structure has proven its strength to go up to three floors with the support
of brick columns. With this technique there is reduction in cost of the wall by 25% as with
conventional English bond (9thk wall) 350 bricks are required per cu. m whereas in Rattrap bond only 280 bricks are required and also the reduced number of joints reduces the
mortar consumption.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
Brick jail
The common burnt brick is one of mans great inventions. all over the world, with only a few
exceptions, nearly all bricks are roughly the same shape and size - that is about 9 x 4.5 x 3 inches.
In many of these situations listed above a JALI is just as effective. Far from being a lot more
costly than the basic wall, if made of brick it can be less costly than the house wall.
Instead of using regular walling system of lintel and window system ,jali work can help cost
estimation. Climate consideration and use of local materials helps maintaining economy than the
general rcc practice.
More methods
Soil
cement
block
technology
this method of construction of wall is by soil cement blocks in place of burnt bricks
16
masonry. It is an energy efficient method of construction where soil mixed with 5% and
above cement and pressed in hand operated machine and cured well and then used in the
masonry. The overall economy that could be achieved with the soil cement technology is
about 15 to 20% compared to conventional method of construction.
Concrete
block
walling
In view of high energy consumption by burnt brick it is suggested to use concrete block
(block hollow and solid) which consumes about only 1/3 of the energy of the burnt bricks in
its production. Concrete block masonry saves mortar consumption, speedy construction of
wall resulting in higher output of labor, plastering can be avoided thereby an overall saving
of 10 to 25% can be achieved.
4.3.6
Roofs
Domes and vaults in brick or stabilized mud block with appropriate mortar.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
4.3.7
Filler slabs
Ferrocement channels
4.3.8
Provide an economic solution to RCC slab by providing 30 to 40% cost reduction on floor/roof unit
over RCC slabs without compromising the strength. These being precast, construction is speedy,
economical due to avoidance of shuttering and facilitate quality control.
18
4.3.9
The filler slab is based on the principle that for roofs which are simply supported, the upper
part of the slab is subjected to compressive forces and the lower part of the slab experience
tensile forces. Concrete is very good in withstanding compressive forces and steel bears the
load due to tensile forces. Thus the lower tensile region of the slab does not need any
concrete except for holding the steel reinforcements together.
Therefore in a conventional RCC slab lot of concrete is wasted and it needs extra
reinforcement due to added load of the concrete which can otherwise be replaced by lowcost and light weight filler materials, which will reduce the dead weight as well as the cost
of the slab to 25% (as 40% less steel is used and 30% less concrete)
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
4.4.1
Benefits-
Saving on cost
The savings on cost can be from 15 per cent to 25 per cent. But designing a filler slab requires a
structural engineer to determine the spacing between the reinforcement bars.
20
4.4.2
Thermal insulation-
The air pocket formed by the contours of the tiles makes an excellent thermal insulation layer. The
design integrity of a filler slab involves careful planning taking into account the negative zones and
reinforcement areas
4.4.3
Patterned ceilings-
Filler slabs provide aesthetically pleasing patterned ceilings. In most houses, the filler material is
left open without plastering to form aesthetic design symmetry but some residents prefer to cover
the space with Plaster of Paris coating.
4.4.4
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
4.5
More methods4.6
Doors
and
windows
It is suggested not to use wood for doors and windows and in its place concrete or steel
section frames shall be used for achieving saving in cost up to 30 to 40%.Similiarly for
shutters commercially available block boards, fibre or wooden practical boards etc., shall be
used for reducing the cost by about 25.
4.7
Lintels
The traditional R.C.C. lintels which are costly can be replaced by brick arches for small spans
and save construction cost up to 30 to 40% over the traditional method of construction.
22
4.8
Arches are an economical and aesthetic means of spanning openings. Arches can be a cost
effective alternative to the lintels.
The traditional RCC lintels which are costly can be replaced by brick arches for small spans
and save construction cost up to 3040% over the traditional method of construction.
4.9
Door panels
Ferrocement doors
[Type text]
[Type text]
24
Methodology
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
Data Collection
6.1
6.2
6.3
The construction methods of walling and roofing are selected for the detail cost analysis based on
available resources from previous thesis.
Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the cost analysis of the traditional construction methods and the low
cost housing technologies in the case studies for walling and roofing respectively. It is found that
about 26.11% and 22.68% of the construction cost, including material and labour cost, can be saved
by using the low cost housing technologies in comparison with the traditional construction methods
for walling and roofing respectively.
Table 1: Cost Analysis of traditional Construction Methods and the low cost housing technologies
used in case studies for 1m3 of walling ( Works Department, 2002), when the US$ in changed in
Rupees it will give the same change
26
Table 2: Cost Analysis of traditional Construction Methods and the low cost housing technologies
used in case studies for 1m3 of roofing ( Works Department, 2002), when the US$ in changed in
Rupees it will give the same change
DISCUSSION
7.1
7.2
1. Foundation: Foundation is the lowest part of the structure which is provided to distribute loads to
the soil thus providing base for the super-structure. Excavation work is first carried out, then earthwork is filled with available earth and ends with watering and compaction in a 6 thick layer.
Disadvantge.
2. Cement concrete: Plain cement concrete is used to form a leveled surface on the excavated soil.
The volumetric concrete mix proportion of 1:4:8 (cement: sand: aggregate), with a 6 thick layer for
masonry foundation and column footings is used. Plain cement concrete is finished on the
excavated soil strata and mixed by manual process.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
7.3.1 Foundation
Arch foundation is used in which walls are supported on the brick or stone masonry. For the
construction of the foundation, the use of available materials such as brick or concrete blocks can
be made to resist lateral forces buttresses at the corner.
28
2. Walling
Rat trap bond technology is used in the case study. It is an alternative brick bonding system for
English and Flemish Bond. The reduced number of joints can reduce mortar consumption. No
plastering of the outside face is required and the wall usually is quite aesthetically pleasing and
air gaps created within the wall help making the house thermally comfortable. In summer, the
temperature inside the house is usually at least 5 degrees lower that the outside ambient temperature
and vice versa in winter
3. Roofing: A filler slab roofing system is used which based on the principle that for roofs which are
simply supported, the upper part of the slab is subjected to compressive forces and the lower part of
the slab experience tensile forces. Concrete is very good in withstanding compressive forces and
steel bears the load due to tensile forces. Thus the low tensile region of the slab does not need
any concrete except for holding steel reinforcements together.
4. Flooring: Flooring is generally made of terracotta tiles or color oxides. Bedding is made out of
broken brick bats. Various patterns and designs are used, depending on shape, size of tiles, span of
flooring, and clients personal preference.
5. Plastering: Plastering can be avoided on the walls, frequent expenditure on finishes and its
maintenance is avoided. Properly protected brick wall will never loose its color or finish.
6. Doors and windows: As door and window frames are responsible for almost half the cost of
timber used, avoiding frames can considerably reduce timber cost. Door planks are screwed
together with strap iron hinges to form doors, and this can be carried by holdfast carried into the
wall. The simplest and cost effective door can be made of vertical planks held together with
horizontal or diagonal battens. A simplest frameless window consists of a vertical plank of about 9
wide set into two holes, one at the top and one at the bottom. This forms a simple pivotal window.
Wide span windows can be easily framed and fixed to walls or can have rows of pivotal planks
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
7.5
7.6
Precast Concrete
Precast concrete blocks made to similar dimension of stone blocks without large size stone
pieces, but using coarse and fine graded cement. They have excellent properties comparable to
other masonry blocks, are cheaper and facilitate speedy construction and especially suitable
where quality clay for bricks making is not available.
30
Recommendations
8.1
Arch Footing/Foundation
It is used to be provided for multi-storeyed buildings in olden times. However, with the
advent of reinforced cement concrete construction practice, arch fooing is rarely done these
days. One of the drawbacks in this type of construction is that the end piles have to be
specially strengthened by buttresses to avoid the arch thrust tending to rapture the pier
junction. However, the advantage of inverted arch construction is that in soft soils the depth
of foundation is greatly reduced. Inverted arch footing has been illustrated below.
Advtages
8.2
is a brick masonry method of wall construction, in which bricks are placed in vertical position
instead of conventional horizontal position and thus creating a cavity (hollow space) within the
wall. The bricks are placed in vertical position, so that 110 mm face is seen from front elevation,
instead of the 75mm face (considering brick of standard size 230 X 110 X 75 mm). Since width of
wall remains 230mm, an internal cavity is created. This is where approximately 30% Material
(brick and mortar) is saved and thus overall construction cost is reduced.
8.2.1
Requires approximately 25% less bricks and 40% less mortar than traditional masonry
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
conduits are hidden inside wall, resulting in better aesthetic appearance without plastering
(exposed brickwork).
8.3
There is a lot of difference between cheap construction practices and cost effective ones. While
taking up construction, most fail to appreciate the difference and end up spending quite a bit of their
money. This against a possibility of cost - effective options that while ensuring good and efficient
construction also leaves you with a substantial saving. Filler slabs are one such cost - effective
roofing system which is based on the concrete portions and instead placing filler material there. The
material used as a replacement includes bricks, tiles, cellular concrete blocks. The filler slab is
based on the principle that for roofs which are simply supported, the upper part of the slab is
subjected to compressive forces and the lower part of the slab experience tensile forces. Concrete is
very good in withstanding compressive forces and steel bears the load due to tensile forces. Thus
the lower tensile region of the slab does not need any concrete except for holding the steel
reinforcements together.
32
Conclusions
The dream of owning a house particularly for low-income and middle-income families is becoming
a difficult reality. It is necessary to adopt cost effective, innovative and environment-friendly
housing technologies for the construction. The goal of this paper was too compare and contrast
traditional cost theories as they relate to the construction industry. I did a lot of research for the
literature review from previous reports. After doing the interview and research on the cost effective
technologies, I selected one type of cost effective technology among the three. Why Cost
implications, time easy construction methods
This proves the benefits and the trends for implementing low cost housing technologies in the
industry.
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]
References
https://www.cevmultimedia.com/index.php?p=product&id=1565
http://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i2/SUB151760.pdf
https://www.wbdg.org/design/cost_effective.php
http://www.cmhcschl.gc.ca/en/inpr/afhoce/afhoce/afhostcast/afhoid/cote/buenefho/buenefho_002.cfm
http://www.gharexpert.com/Image_Strip/Single_full_image_for_all_new.aspx?
h=1440&w=2560&type=art_img&CatId=1&ImageId=3030&move_to=&ind=&find=&uid=&FID=&GID=
http://www.gharexpert.com/a/ashishbatra/1670/Filler-Slabs_0.aspx
http://www.istudioarchitecture.com/rat-trap-bond/
http://www.theconstructioncivil.org/inverted-arch-footingfoundation/
http://www.aboutcivil.org/foundation-types-construction-methods.html
file:///Users/kistenarmon/Downloads/published.pdf
http://www.engineeringcivil.com/low-cost-housing.html
http://theconstructor.org/building/materials-for-low-cost-housing/5352/
https://www.mak.ac.ug/documents/Makfiles/aet2011/Otim-2.pdf
34
http://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/brockmancostofconflict.pdf
http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=cmgt_fac
http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/34142/files/fmtgn-preparingpresenting-cost-estimates.pdf
http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab089228.pdf
http://pmbook.ce.cmu.edu/12_Cost_Control,_Monitoring,_and_Accounting.html
[Type text]
[Type text]
[Type text]