Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Mahboob Siddiqui
1
Agenda
Historical
Background
NGN
Building Blocks of NGN
Brief overview of Protocols between NGN Elements
NGN
C5
NGN Roadmap
NGN Case Studies
Evolution towards IMS
Historical Background
PSTN was designed to provide basic voice services.
With PCM transmission technique, 64 kb/s channel became the basic
building block of PSTN system.
The SPC (essentially computers) used in PSTN switches allowed a
number of supplementary services on top of basic voice service.
Through modems, it was possible to use PSTN for access to data
networks, with data speeds up to 64 kbps.
Parallel to PSTN network, public data networks were deployed as an
overlay network to support various data services.
Historical Background
In mid 90s, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) was the first
major step in integrating both voice and data networks.
ISDN offered a digital interface to the user with 64kb/s channels, the
important difference being the usage of these channels for voice or data
can be determined on a per call basis.
Apart from economic reasons, there was still a problem with the ISDN.
Since channel allocation was in units of 64 kb/s, there was non-optimal
usage of transmission bandwidth in many scenarios.
For example, channels allocated for voice calls are not used half the
time because a person is listening; advantage of speech compression
cannot be leveraged; data is usually sent in bursts, but a fixed allocation
of bandwidth leads to wastage when no data is sent.
Historical Background
The answer to this problem lies in packet switching, where
payload is encapsulated into packets & packets are stamped
with destination address for routing in a packet switched
network.
This led to ATM taking shape in mid 90's, which offered cell
switching with fixed cell size of 53 bytes (48 + 5).
ATM is a layer 2 protocol capable of adapting all forms of media,
not just voice, but also video and data.
However, ATM arrived in the scene a bit too late, when Ethernet
and Internet Protocol (IP) had already established themselves
firmly in the LAN environment.
ATM became a protocol of choice in the WAN environment, a
place that it shared with frame relay.
Historical Background
In LAN, Ethernet continued as the dominant layer2 protocol
For packet transport of voice in the LAN, IP (over Ethernet) was
considered, while in the carrier network, voice transport over ATM was
considered.
Both IP and ATM emerged as a means to transport voice, leading to the
concept of Voice over IP (VoIP) and Voice over ATM (VoATM)
respectively.
Next Generation Network (NGN) was thus born with this realization that
a packet switching infrastructure was the best way to support different
media types of varying bit rates, over the same converged network.
NGN
NGN
ITU definition of NGN
use
of
multiple
broadband
access
In other words
Next Generation Network:
Open and distributed network architecture
NGN adopts the hierarchical architecture, which is divided into
media
access
layer,
transport
layer,
control
layer
and
service/application layer.
Independent network control layer
NGN is based on standard protocols and packet switching network.
Architecture
Service Management
Network Control
Core Switch
Edge Access
Service Management
Network Control
Policy
Server
Application
Server
Location
Server
SoftSwitch
RADIUS
Server
MRS
SCP
SoftSwitch
Core Switching
Edge Access
IAD
AMG
BroadBand
Access
SG
PSTN
Dr. Mahboob Siddiqui
12
TMG
UMG
UMG
PLMN/3G
SoftSwitch
Switching Array
IP Core
Trunk Module
Trunk
Gateway
Service Server
CPU
Signaling
Module
SS7
Signaling
Gateway
User
Access Module
Trunk
Gateway
Trunk
Gateway
User Access
Gateway
Dr. Mahboob Siddiqui
13
Soft Switch
Softswitch is the core element in the NGN network.
Softswitch performs:
z call processing
z media gateway access control
z resource allocation
z protocol handling
z routing
z Authentication (subscriber database)
z Billing & maintenance functions
Through collaboration with service layer devices such as application
servers & SCPs, softswitch provides traditional as well as variety of new
intelligent services.
It performs interoperability with peer NGN entities.
Gateways
Trunk Gateway (TGW)
Gateways
Multi Service Access Gateway (MSAN)
Allows interconnection of legacy PSTN & ISDN subscribers lines
as well as xDSL lines.
Implements variety of codecs to allow transport of voice signals
over IP network & vice versa.
Supports H.248 protocol to interwork with soft-switch.
Allows access to BRAS devices for xDSL lines.
Integrated
SoftSwitch
SoftSwitch
IP Core Network
Talking Path
IAD
UMG
AMG
Broadband
Access
SG
PSTN
TMG
UMG
PLMN
3G Access
Edge Access
IAD
IP Core Network
UMG
AMG
Broadband
Access
SG
PSTN
TMG
UMG
PLMN
3G Access
IN
OSS
SNMP/MML
MRS
PARLAY/
SIP
Location Server
AppServer
TRIP
MGCP/H248/SIP
INAP
SIP-T/BICC/H.323
Softswitch
M3UA/SCTP
Softswitch
H.248
M2UA/SCTP
SG
ISUP
H.248
H.248/MGCP
STP
TMG
SIP/
H.323
switch
PLMN
PSTN
AMG
IAD
Soft-phone
MGW
Summary
20
Agenda
C5 NGN Roadmap
Phase-I: NEC/AXE Replacement
Phase-II: Consolidation & NGN Cities
Phase-III: Migration of Remaining Network
Flatter
Ide
al t
r
ans
it
ion
OPEX
Shorter
Current Network
Hybrid Network
All-IP Network
Present
Transition
Future
time
Competitors with
significantly
better cost structure
Regulatory
Decisions
Anticipated
post-transformation
revenue growth
Revenue
Cost
Critical situation!!!
?%
cost reduction
? investment schedule
? time of investment
Today
Source: Booz Allen Hamilton, 2006
time
Region
TX (Transit exchange)
Pure Transit
CX (Combined Exchange)
Transit+Local
EWSD
E10B
EWSD
E10B
C&C08
CTR
FTR
GTR
HTR
ITR
KTR
LTR
MTR
NTR-1
NTR-2
RTR
STR-1
STR-5
WTR
17
11
Total
HCTE
(High capacity TX)
Current C4 NGN
Huawei C4 NGN
Deployed as part of transit expansion project (2003-2004)
z
z
Step 2
Gradually migration transit traffic from TDM to NGN network
Introduce IP interconnect with CMOs & LDIs
z
z
z
CX
TG
Transit
Local
VoIP
TDM
District 1
District2
District 3
TDM LD
Transit
Plane
Z%
100%-Y%
Y%
Advantage:
Consistent with NGN flat network
structure
In the future, all transit plane will be
IP-Based NGN with TDM network
withdrawal.
NGN LD Transit
Plane
Local Telecom
Network 1
100%-Z%
X% 100%-X%
Local Telecom
Network 2
Local Telecom
Network 3
International Network
S.
No
International
Gateway
Installed
C4 NGN
Huawei
2005
C&C 08 Huawei
China
August
2002
Used
(E-1s)
IGE-III Islamabad
at PTCL Complex
S/T RWP
INT: 400
NAT:
500
INT: 183
NAT: 225
INT: 200
BeingatReplacedAXE-10
with TGW controlled
C4 NGN SoftSoft-switch
IGE-II Karachi
(TG-III) by existing
November
NAT:
Marston Road
Ericsson Sweden
1998
278
INT: 195
NAT:204
INT: 320
NAT:42
0
INT: 142
NAT: 276
C & C 08 Huawei
China
Capacit
y (E1s)
August
2002
on
60%
50%
HCTE Migration
30% Traffic
Migration
40%
30%
20%
15% Traffic
Migration
DTE Migration
10%
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
Master Plan
C5 Local Network
C5 Master plan
10% NGN penetration by end of 2008
z New Expansion
325 K (IP/NGN) using FTTC/ONU
z
TDM Migration
400 K (IP/NGN) Replacement using MSAN
TDM Migration
2 M (IP/NGN)
Master Plan
OFAN
z
z
z
z
Lines
Vendors
ONU
North
Center
South
93000
245000
203500
ZTE
ZTE
Huawei
241
616
612
Currently POTs traffic is back hauled via V5.2 over TDM switches
In future, POTs traffic will be back hauled on C5 NGN
Similarly, VoBB traffic will also be homed to C5 soft-switches.
Triple Play
z
z
z
37
37
AG
Heartbeat
13
- 4 M Line Ports
- 8 Pairs of SS
-
20
- Total
28
25
8
7
55
Dr. Mahboob Siddiqui
39
34
7
3
8
40
ITR
HTR
North
Softswitch
NTR
MSAN
NTR-2
SoftSwitch
2Pairs SoftSwitch
IP link
SoftSwitch
3Pairs
3 pairs
IP Network
WTR
CTR/GTR
STR-3
LTR
STR-2
Central
FTR
MTR
STR-I
South
STR-II
C5 NGN Roadmap
Strategy
TDM
Licenses
Licenses
Replacement lines
For SIP
North
45,724
32,400
10,000
Central-I
96,000
32,800
10,000
Central-II
270,336
36,000
15,000
South
40,000
10,000
Total
412,000
141,000
45,000
( Lahore )
Why Replacement
Outlived exchanges (installed in 1992-93)
z
z
z
Project Deliverables
Project Timeline
200 days
180 days
165 days
IP Centrex
Web 800
Click to Dial & Click to Fax
CRBT
Unified Messaging
SHLR based services
Network Consolidation
Support from switch vendors (Alcatel, Siemens ??)
Either pay $$$ for TDM upgrade or move towards NGN
z
z
z
Rest of PSTN LE
migration
Phase 3
Phase 2
step-3
Phase 2
step-2
Phase 2
NGN migration in
big cities
step-1
Phase 1
2008
2009
2010
AXE and NEC LE
replacement
Dr. Mahboob Siddiqui
51
2011
2012
2013
Phase-II
Implementation Strategy
Sr. No.
Switch
ALI
EWSD
2851602
1997225
E10B
1974069
1348883
ZXJ-10
1103799
700521
AXE-10
300432
258523
NEAX-61E
97455
89472
6327357
4394624
Total
ALIS
CITY
OFAN
Lines
Exchange
Lines
Total
Lines
Lahore
129K
581K
710K
(EWSD
&ZXJ10)
(EWSD
&ZXJ10)
Islamabad &
Rawalpindi
74K
271 K
(EWSD
&ZXJ10)
(EWSD
&ZXJ10)
Karachi
182K
1073 K
EWSD,E10B
&ZXJ10)
(EWSD,E10B
&ZXJ10)
345K
1255K
Switch
Type
OFAN
Lines
Exchange
Lines
Remarks
EWSD
104K
374 K
478K
Partial Rep. ?
ZXJ10
25K
207 K
232K
Easy to make
these into
AGWs
E-10B
0.3 K
0.3K
Replace
581 K
710K
Total Lines
129K
Total
Lines
Switch
Type
OFAN
Lines
Exchange
Lines
Total
Lines
Remarks
EWSD
29K
186 K
215K
Partial or full
E10B
110K
716 K
826K
Partial or full
ZXJ10
43K
171 K
214K
Partial
Total Lines
182K
1073 K
1255K
Switch
Type
OFAN
Lines
Exchange
Lines
Remarks
EWSD
69K
188 K
257k
Partial Rep.
ZXJ10
5K
83 K
88k
Partial Rep
E-10B
Total Lines
74K
271 K
Total
Lines
345k
City-wise
PROS
z Offer new services across the whole city
z Cannibalization of new equipment at other locations.
CONS
z Even recently deployed TDM switches (2003) will be replaced
Region
Karachi
MSU
ALI
RLU
ALI
OFAN
ALI
Total ALI
27672
27672
27672
470278
27672
27672
27672
89654
27672
27672
27672
91068
FTR
27672
27672
27672
175013
ITR
27672
27672
27672
141685
STR 2&3
Hyderabad
STR-1
Lahore
(N&S)
Lahore
AXE is already being replaced with C5 NGN.
ZXJ10 can be converted into IP based AGWs with H.248 back-haul to
Soft-switches
ONU based lines (125K) can be back-hauled to NGN soft-switches
30% of EWSD lines (DLUDs) can be converted into Access Gateways,
without needing MDF level migration.
Karachi
Almost no presence of C5 NGN (except Gulshan-e-Hadeed)
Large number of Alcatels E10B exchanges (close to 1 Mil. )
40% of E10B lines (CSN MM) can be converted to Access Gateways,
without needing MDF level migration.
More problems are being experienced in E10B.
ALU is more non-cooperative as compared to NSN.
Thanks