Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Appellate jurisdiction
By way of petition for
review on certiorari
(Rule 45) against:
1. CA
2. CTA
3. Sandiganbayan
4. RTC on pure
questions of law
Cases involving
constitutionality or
validity of:
1. Law
2. Treaty
3. International or
Executive
Agreement
4. PD
5. Proclamation
6. Order
7. Instruction
8. Ordinance
9. Regulation
Legality of:
1. Tax
2. Impost
3. Assessment
4. Toll or Penalty
5. Jurisdiction of
lower court
CTA decisions rendered
Exceptions:
(Findings SCITES, JIGFO)
1. Findings grounded entirely on speculation, surmises
or conjectures
2. Findings of facts are conflicting
3. In making its findings, the CA went beyond the issues
of the case or its findings are contrary to the
admissions of both the appellant and the appellee
4. Findings are contrary to those of the trial court
5. Findings are conclusions without citation of specific
evidence on which they are based
6. Findings of fact are premised on the supposed
absence of evidence and contradicted by the evidence
on record
7. Judgment is based on a misapprehension of facts
8. The inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd,
or impossible
9. Grave abuse of discretion
10.
When the facts set forth in the petition, as well
as in the petitioners main and reply briefs, are not
disputed by respondent
11.
When the CA manifestly overlooked certain
relevant facts not disputed by the parties, which, if
properly considered, could justify a different
conclusion
Original cases cognizable by the SC
1. Sec. 1, Rule 56
a. Certiorari
b. Prohibition
c. Mandamus
d. Quo Warranto