Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Quantum Entanglement PDF
Quantum Entanglement PDF
2 CONCEPT
quantum theory that EPR purported to establish. Specifically, he demonstrated an upper limit, seen in Bells inequality, regarding the strength of correlations that can
be produced in any theory obeying local realism, and he
showed that quantum theory predicts violations of this
limit for certain entangled systems.[18] His inequality is
experimentally testable, and there have been numerous
relevant experiments, starting with the pioneering work
of Freedman and Clauser in 1972[19] and Aspects experiments in 1982.[20] They have all shown agreement with
quantum mechanics rather than the principle of local realism. However, the issue is not nally settled, as each of
these experimental tests has left open at least one loophole
by which it is possible to question the validity of the results.
The work of Bell raised the possibility of using these super strong correlations as a resource for communication.
It led to the discovery of quantum key distribution protocols, most famously BB84 by Bennet and Brassard and
E91 by Artur Ekert. Although BB84 does not use entanglement, Ekerts protocol uses the violation of a Bells
inequality as a proof of security.
2.4
2.2
Apparent paradox
2.3
3
random measurement outcome) must be incomplete. (In
fact similar paradoxes can arise even without entanglement: the position of a single particle is spread out over
space, and two detectors attempting to detect the particle
at dierent positions must attain appropriate correlation,
so that they do not both detect the particle.)
that have not interacted with the subjects, but were entangled with photons that did interact with such objects.
Lemos, from the University of Vienna, is condent that
this new quantum imaging technique could nd application where low light imaging is imperative, in elds like
biological or medical imaging.[29]
2.6
2.7
There is much confusion about the meaning of entanglement, non-locality and hidden variables and how they relate to each other. As described above, entanglement is an
experimentally veried and accepted property of nature,
which has critical implications for the interpretations of
quantum mechanics. The question becomes, How can
one account for something that was at one point indenite with regard to its spin (or whatever is in this case the
subject of investigation) suddenly becoming denite in
that regard even though no physical interaction with the
second object occurred, and, if the two objects are sufciently far separated, could not even have had the time
needed for such an interaction to proceed from the rst
to the second object?"[35] The latter question involves the
issue of locality, i.e., whether for a change to occur in
something the agent of change has to be in physical contact (at least via some intermediary such as a eld force)
with the thing that changes. Study of entanglement brings
into sharp focus the dilemma between locality and the
completeness or lack of completeness of quantum mechanics.
Bells theorem and related results rule out a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics (one which obeys
the principle of locality while also ascribing denite values to quantum observables). However, in other interpretations, the experiments that demonstrate the apparent
non-locality can also be described in local terms: If each
distant observer regards the other as a quantum system,
communication between the two must then be treated as a
measurement process, and this communication is strictly
local.[36] In particular, in the many worlds interpretation,
the underlying description is fully local.[37] More generally, the question of locality in quantum physics is extraordinarily subtle and sometimes hinges on precisely
how it is dened.
4.2
Ensembles
4.1
Pure states
2. Alice measures 1, and the state of the system collapses to |1A |0B .
Consider two noninteracting systems A and B, with respective Hilbert spaces HA and HB. The Hilbert space of If the former occurs, then any subsequent measurement
performed by Bob, in the same basis, will always return 1.
the composite system is the tensor product
If the latter occurs, (Alice measures 1) then Bobs measurement will return 0 with certainty. Thus, system B has
been altered by Alice performing a local measurement on
HA HB .
system A. This remains true even if the systems A and B
If the rst system is in state |A and the second in state are spatially separated. This is the foundation of the EPR
paradox.
|B , the state of the composite system is
The outcome of Alices measurement is random. Alice
cannot decide which state to collapse the composite system into, and therefore cannot transmit information to
|A |B .
Bob by acting on her system. Causality is thus preserved,
States of the composite system which can be represented in this particular scheme. For the general argument, see
in this form are called separable states, or (in the simplest no-communication theorem.
case) product states.
Not all states are separable states (and thus product
states). Fix a basis {|iA } for HA and a basis {|jB } for 4.2 Ensembles
HB. The most general state in HA HB is of the form
As mentioned above, a state of a quantum system is given
by a unit vector in a Hilbert space. More generally, if one
c
c
.
If
a
state
general form:
ij
i
j
i
j
is inseparable, it is called an entangled state.
For example, given two basis vectors {|0A ,|1A } of HA
wi |i i |,
and two basis vectors {|0B ,|1B } of HB, the following is =
i
an entangled state:
1
2
B
pi A
i i ,
For example, the reduced density matrix of A for the entangled state
i
B
where p are positive valued probabilities, A
i 's and i
's are themselves states on the subsystems A and B respectively. In other words, a state is separable if it is a
probability distribution over uncorrelated states, or product states. We can assume without loss of generality that
B
A
i and i are pure ensembles. A state is then said to
be entangled if it is not separable. In general, nding out
whether or not a mixed state is entangled is considered
dicult. The general bipartite case has been shown to be
NP-hard.[42] For the 2 2 and 2 3 cases, a necessary
and sucient criterion for separability is given by the famous Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) condition.[43]
4.3
1
2
discussed above is
A =
1
2
A = |A |A .
In general, a bipartite pure state is entangled if and
only if its reduced states are mixed rather than pure. Reduced density matrices were explicitly calculated in different spin chains with unique ground state. An example
is the one-dimensional AKLT spin chain:[45] the ground
state can be divided into a block and an environment. The
reduced density matrix of the block is proportional to a
projector to a degenerate ground state of another Hamiltonian.
The reduced density matrix also was evaluated for XY
spin chains, where it has full rank. It was proved that
in the thermodynamic limit, the spectrum of the reduced
density matrix of a large block of spins is an exact geometric sequence[46] in this case.
A =
4.4
Entropy
7
4.4.2 As a measure of entanglement
Entropy provides one tool which can be used to quantify entanglement, although other entanglement measures
exist.[48] If the overall system is pure, the entropy of one
subsystem can be used to measure its degree of entanglement with the other subsystems.
For bipartite pure states, the von Neumann entropy of
reduced states is the unique measure of entanglement in
the sense that it is the only function on the family of states
that satises certain axioms required of an entanglement
measure.
The plot of von Neumann entropy Vs Eigenvalue for a bipartite 2-level pure state. When the eigenvalue has value .5, von
Neumann entropy is at a maximum, corresponding to maximum
entanglement.
..
1
In general, one uses the Borel functional calculus to calcun
late log(). If acts on a nite-dimensional Hilbert space
and has eigenvalues 1 , , n , the Shannon entropy is
For mixed states, the reduced von Neumann entropy is
recovered:
not the unique entanglement measure.
lim p log p = 0,
p0
dP ,
log2 =
log2 dP .
(
U (t) = exp
iHt
)
,
where H is the Hamiltonian of the system. This associates the reversibility of a process with its resulting entropy change, i.e., a process is reversible if, and only if,
it leaves the entropy of the system invariant. This provides a connection between quantum information theory
and thermodynamics. Rnyi entropy also can be used as
a measure of entanglement.
5 APPLICATIONS
4.5
Entanglement measures
Entanglement measures quantify the amount of entanglement in a (often viewed as a bipartite) quantum state.
As aforementioned, entanglement entropy is the standard
measure of entanglement for pure states (but no longer
a measure of entanglement for mixed states). For mixed
states, there are some entanglement measures in the literature [48] and no single one is standard.
Entanglement cost
Distillable entanglement
Entanglement of formation
Relative entropy of entanglement
1
| = (|0A |0B |1A |1B )
2
Squashed entanglement
1
| = (|0A |1B |1A |0B )
2
Logarithmic negativity
These four pure states are all maximally entangled (acMost (but not all) of these entanglement measures reduce cording to the entropy of entanglement) and form an
for pure states to entanglement entropy, and are dicult orthonormal basis (linear algebra) of the Hilbert space
of the two qubits. They play a fundamental role in Bells
(NP-hard) to compute.[50]
theorem.
For a multi-partite system, it might be articial or arbitrary to split the system into two parts. In this case, the For M>2 qubits, the GHZ state is
geometric measure of entanglement [51] is favored. For
example, for a system of identical fermions, the entan|0M + |1M
glement between the fermions can be quantied by the |GHZ =
,
2
overlap between the fermionic wave function and its optimal Slater approximation.[52] The apparent advantage of which reduces to the Bell state |+ for M = 2 . The
this approach is that all the particles are treated on equal traditional GHZ state was dened for M = 3 . GHZ
footing, as they should be since they are indistinguishable. states are occasionally extended to qudits, i.e. systems of
d rather than 2 dimensions.
Also for M>2 qubits, there are spin squeezed states.[58]
Spin squeezed states are a class of states satisfying certain
The Reeh-Schlieder theorem of quantum eld theory is restrictions on the uncertainty of spin measurements, and
sometimes seen as an analogue of quantum entanglement. are necessarily entangled.[59]
4.6
Applications
|NOON =
|N a |0b + |0a |N b
,
2
Entanglement has many applications in quantum information theory. With the aid of entanglement, otherwise
This is like a Bell state |+ except the basis kets 0 and 1
impossible tasks may be achieved.
have been replaced with the N photons are in one mode
Among the best-known applications of entanglement are and the N photons are in the other mode.
superdense coding and quantum teleportation.[53]
Finally, there also exist twin Fock states for bosonic
Most researchers believe that entanglement is necessary modes, which can be created by feeding a Fock state into
to realize quantum computing (although this is disputed two arms leading to a beam-splitter. They are the sum
by some[54] ).
of multiple of NOON states, and can used to achieve the
[60]
Entanglement is used in some protocols of quantum Heisenberg limit.
cryptography.[55][56] This is because the shared noise
of entanglement makes for an excellent one-time pad.
Moreover, since measurement of either member of an
entangled pair destroys the entanglement they share,
entanglement-based quantum cryptography allows the
5.2
Entanglement is usually created by direct interactions between subatomic particles. These interactions can take
numerous forms. One of the most commonly used methods is spontaneous parametric down-conversion to generate a pair of photons entangled in polarisation.[61] Other
methods include the use of a ber coupler to conne and
mix photons, the use of quantum dots to trap electrons until decay occurs, the use of the Hong-Ou-Mandel eect,
etc. In the earliest tests of Bells theorem, the entangled
particles were generated using atomic cascades.
It is also possible to create entanglement between quantum systems that never directly interacted, through the
use of entanglement swapping.
5.3
See also
Ansible
Concurrence (quantum computing)
Correlation does not imply causation
Entanglement distillation
Entanglement witness
Faster-than-light communication
GhirardiRiminiWeber theory
Multipartite entanglement
Normally distributed and uncorrelated does not imply independent
Observer eect (physics)
Photon entanglement
Quantum coherence
Quantum discord
Quantum phase transition
Quantum pseudo-telepathy
Retrocausality
Separable state
Squashed entanglement
Wards probability amplitude
WheelerFeynman absorber theory
7 References
[1] Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N; Podolsky; Rosen
(1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?". Phys. Rev.
47 (10): 777780.
Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
[2] Schrdinger E; Born, M. (1935). Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31 (4): 555563. Bibcode:1935PCPS...31..555S.
doi:10.1017/S0305004100013554.
[3] Schrdinger E; Dirac, P A. M. (1936). Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 32 (3): 446452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S.
doi:10.1017/S0305004100019137.
[4] Physicist John Bell depicts the Einstein camp in this debate in his article entitled Bertlmanns socks and the nature of reality, p. 142 of Speakable and unspeakable in
quantum mechanics: For EPR that would be an unthinkable 'spooky action at a distance'. To avoid such action at
a distance they have to attribute, to the space-time regions
in question, real properties in advance of observation, correlated properties, which predetermine the outcomes of
these particular observations. Since these real properties,
xed in advance of observation, are not contained in quantum formalism, that formalism for EPR is incomplete. It
may be correct, as far as it goes, but the usual quantum formalism cannot be the whole story. And again on p. 144
Bell says: Einstein had no diculty accepting that aairs
in dierent places could be correlated. What he could
not accept was that an intervention at one place could inuence, immediately, aairs at the other. Downloaded 5
July 2011 from Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. CERN. ISBN 0521334950.
Retrieved June 2014.
[5] 75 years of entanglement - Science News. Retrieved 13
October 2014.
[6] Francis, Matthew. Quantum entanglement shows that reality can't be local, Ars Technica, 30 October 2012
10
REFERENCES
11
[62] Gurvits, L., Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds problem and quantum entanglement, in Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM Press, New York, 2003.
[50] Huang, Yichen (21 March 2014). Computing quantum discord is NP-complete. New Journal of Physics
Bibcode:2014NJPh...16c3027H.
16 (3): 033027.
doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033027.
12
EXTERNAL LINKS
Further reading
Bengtsson I; yczkowski K (2006). Geometry
of Quantum States. An Introduction to Quantum
Entanglement. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
External links
The original EPR paper
Quantum Entanglement at Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy
How to entangle photons experimentally (subscription required)
A creative interpretation of Quantum Entanglement
Alberts chest: entanglement for lay persons
13
10
10.1
10.2
Images
File:NYT_May_4,_1935.jpg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/NYT_May_4%2C_1935.jpg License: Public domain Contributors: http://www.ias.edu/articles/physics Original artist: New York Times
File:Qm_template_pic_4.svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Qm_template_pic_4.svg License: CC0
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Maschen
File:SPDC_figure.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/SPDC_figure.png License: GFDL Contributors:
Transferred from en.wikipedia.
Original artist: J-Wiki at en.wikipedia
File:Von_Neumann_entropy_for_bipartite_system_plot.svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Von_
Neumann_entropy_for_bipartite_system_plot.svg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: File:Binary entropy plot.svg Original artist:
User:Alejo2083, User:
10.3
Content license