Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Contents
1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 4
1.1. Scope................................................................................................................................4
1.2. Symbols............................................................................................................................ 4
1.3. Configurations...................................................................................................................4
2. Overview............................................................................................................. 5
3. Theory................................................................................................................. 6
3.1. Catalytic Converter Model................................................................................................ 6
3.1.1. Principle of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions................................................ 6
3.1.2. General Approaches and Assumptions.............................................................. 7
3.1.3. FIRE Balance Equations.................................................................................. 10
3.1.4. BOOST Balance Equations, Single Channel Model......................................... 13
3.1.5. Washcoat Layer Pore Diffusion........................................................................20
3.1.6. General Chemical Reaction Rate Calculation.................................................. 26
3.1.7. Transfer Coefficients.........................................................................................28
3.1.8. Spray - Reactive Porosity Interaction............................................................... 31
3.1.9. Nomenclature....................................................................................................33
3.2. Particulate Filter Model.................................................................................................. 39
3.2.1. Introduction....................................................................................................... 39
3.2.2. Overall Modeling Concept................................................................................ 40
3.2.3. Filter Flow Model.............................................................................................. 48
3.2.4. Deposition and Regeneration of Soot and Ash................................................ 52
3.2.5. Soot Migration...................................................................................................56
3.2.6. Modeling a Partial Wall Flow Filter...................................................................57
3.2.7. Modeling Glueing Zones in SIC PFs................................................................ 57
3.2.8. Particulate Filter Model Integration in FIRE and BOOST................................. 58
3.2.9. Nomenclature....................................................................................................60
3.3. Pipe Model..................................................................................................................... 64
3.3.1. Gas Phase Balance Equation.......................................................................... 64
3.3.2. Multi-Layered Wall Model................................................................................. 65
3.3.3. Nomenclature....................................................................................................68
3.4. Injector Model................................................................................................................. 70
3.4.1. Injector Model................................................................................................... 70
3.4.2. Injection Process.............................................................................................. 70
3.4.3. Wallfilm Modeling..............................................................................................71
3.4.4. Nomenclature....................................................................................................72
3.5. Temperature Sensor Model............................................................................................73
3.5.1. Nomenclature....................................................................................................74
3.6. Liquid Species Transport................................................................................................75
3.7. Thermal Coupling of Exhaust Aftertreatment Components............................................ 75
3.8. Kinetic Models................................................................................................................ 77
3.8.1. DOC Catalyst Reactions...................................................................................77
3.8.2. TWC Catalyst Reactions.................................................................................. 78
3.8.3. HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Steady-State Approach................................... 81
3.8.4. HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient Approach.........................................83
3.8.5. Lean NOx Trap.................................................................................................84
3.8.6. NOx Trap Catalyst Reactions...........................................................................89
3.8.7. Filter Regeneration with Oxygen ..................................................................... 90
3.8.8. Filter Regeneration with Oxygen and Nitric Dioxide......................................... 91
3.8.9. Filter Regeneration with Oxygen, Nitric Dioxide and NO-Oxidation..................91
3.8.10. Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions....................................................................... 92
3.8.11. Nomenclature..................................................................................................93
3.9. Literature.........................................................................................................................95
3.10. Appendix....................................................................................................................... 98
3.10.1. Analysis Formulae.......................................................................................... 98
3.10.2. Conversion of Mole and Volume Fractions and ppm's to Mass Fractions
and Vice Versa...................................................................................................... 99
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
This manual describes the usage, files and the theoretical background of aftertreatment modeling
and simulation using the AVL simulation codes BOOST and FIRE.
1.1. Scope
This document is for users of the FIRE/BOOST Aftertreatment Module and anyone interested in
catalyst theory and modeling.
1.2. Symbols
The following symbols are used throughout this manual. Safety warnings must be strictly
observed during operation and service of the system or its components.
Caution:
Cautions describe conditions, practices or procedures which could result in damage to,
or destruction of data if not strictly observed or remedied.
Note:
Notes provide important supplementary information.
Convention
Meaning
Italics
monospace
MenuOpt
A MenuOpt font is used for the names of menu options, submenus and
screen buttons.
1.3. Configurations
Software configurations described in this manual were in effect on the publication date of this
manual. It is the user's responsibility to verify the configuration of the equipment before applying
procedures in this manual.
2. Overview
2. Overview
The FIRE/BOOST Aftertreatment Module enables the simulation of the chemical and physical
processes occurring in various types of
honeycomb type catalytic converter
wall-flow type particle filter
pipes (for BOOST).
The models account for the simulation of the fluid flow within these elements, for heterogeneous
chemical reaction, for adsorption and desorption of species on the catalysts' surface and also
for heterogeneous soot regeneration reactions. The solution of continuity, momentum, species
and energy balances in the gas phase coupled with the solid phase energy conservation and
chemical reactions models delivers detailed results resolved in time and space. Typical results
are for example:
flow velocities inside the channels and overall pressure drop
species mass fractions and pollutant conversion
gas/solid temperatures and thermal behavior
reaction rates and chemical behavior
heat and mass transfer
soot decomposition and regeneration
With the FIRE/BOOST aftertreatment models and their results, a broad range of aftertreatment
applications can be investigated, developed and optimized:
Catalytic Converter
Particle Filter
Three-way catalyst
Reformer catalyst
In order to model all the different chemical reactions given by these various types of applications,
FIRE offers a general chemical reaction input language which has similar functionality to the
CHEMKIN software package. Thus the user can set up his own chemical reaction models
containing gas phase species and species stored on the surface. The kinetic rate equations
are defined via a standard Arrhenius type rate law or via user models. The chemical equilibrium
and sticking coefficient formulation is also considered. The FIRE Aftertreatment Module allows
definition of different kinetic parameter sets that can be assigned to any number of different
catalysts in one geometric model. Additionally, FIRE and BOOST offer pre-defined reaction sets.
For the simulation of catalytic reactions Langmuir-Hinshelwood approaches were setup. The user
has access to all kinetic parameters and therefore can adapt all pre-defined models to different
types of catalysts. In the same way pre-defined soot regeneration models are implemented for all
the regeneration types listed above. Free access to any reaction model, with an arbitrary number
of reactions and species, is offered by user-routines that can be linked to BOOST and FIRE.
3. Theory
3. Theory
3.1. Catalytic Converter Model
Availability
BOOST AT: Catalyst
page [187]
page [100]
page [95]
3. Theory
7. Transport of the products into the bulk gas phase.
Steps 1, 2, 6 and 7 are mass transport steps while steps 3, 4 and 5 are chemical kinetic steps.
To account for these effects properly, the FIRE/BOOST Aftertreatment Module distinguishes the
following types of species:
Gas phase species:
CO + 0.5*O2 = CO2
C3H6 + 4.5*O2 = 3*CO2 + 3*H2O
H2 + 0.5*O2 = H2O
This mechanism accounts for the catalytic oxidation of CO, C3H6 and H2 as proposed by
page [97]
page [95]
numerous authors in literature (i.e. Voltz et al. [65
], Chen et al. [11
] and Wanker
page [97]
et al.[67
]). The reactions are global reactions and do not contain any stored species.
Therefore the influence of adsorption and desorption of species on the surface has to be
considered in the formulation of the reaction rates (kinetics). Most commonly the LangmuirHinshelwood-Hougen-Watson type rate equations are used in literature for these reactions.
FIRE Example: Oxygen storage:
O2 + 2*PT_s = 2*O_s
The above reaction accounts for the effect of Oxygen storage on the catalyst. The Oxygen
molecule dissociates to two Oxygen atoms that are stored on the surface, which is indicated by
the identifier "_s" added to "O". Since two surface sites are occupied by the two Oxygen atoms,
the expression "2*PT_s" must appear on the left hand side of the reaction definition line. PT is
a dummy identifier for one surface site.
3. Theory
Figure 2. Structure of a Squared Cell Monolith
results to
(1)
where wall is the thickness of the substrate wall and wcl,tot is the thickness of the washcoat
layers. The repeat distance s of the monolith can be derived from the cell density CPSM
according to:
(2)
where CPSM is defined as the number of channels per square meter cross sectional area.
Catalysts are often specified with the CPSI number determining the number of channels per
square inch. With given CPSI number one obtains CPSM with equation
(3)
Based on this information (CPSI, wall and washcoat thickness) FIRE/BOOST calculates the
hydraulic channel diameter dhyd, open frontal area OFA and the geometric surface area GSA as
shown below.
Hydraulic channel diameter:
(4)
Monolith's open frontal area (= fluid volume fraction
g)
results from:
(5)
Geometric surface area (= channel wetted perimeter) GSA given in surface per monolith volume
is calculated as:
(6)
In the same way as the dhyd, OFA and GSA are derived from the cell density CPSM and the total
wall thickness , the latter can be calculated from the first three data. Therefore the above given
equations have to be inverted. The cell density is given by
(7)
3. Theory
The washcoat layer thickness ( wcl,tot) of the monolith is assumed to be zero and therefore the
page [8]
page [8]
total thickness is equal to the substrate thickness wall. Eq.7
and Eq.8
show that
three different equations can be used for the evaluation of the cell density and the wall thickness.
The difference between them is that only a pair of two values out of the three data (dhyd, OFA
page [8]
and GSA) is required. FIRE/BOOST uses the first term on the right hand side of Eq.7
and
page [8]
Eq.8
where the hydraulic diameter dhyd and the open frontal area OFA are needed.
The above calculated values of CPSM and wall are exact for squared cells. If other geometries
(round, sinusoidal channel) are given, the derived values of CPSM and wall have to be
understood as approximate values. Deviations do not matter since the calculation kernel of FIRE/
BOOST use the values of dhyd, OFA and GSA in any case.
3.1.2.2. Conservation Equations of Mass or Moles
In general the balance of mass or moles is equivalent and therefore leads to the exact same
results. Due to chemical reactions the number of moles in the system changes, but their overall
mass remains constant. Therefore mass balances are often preferred. In a mole balance
equation, the change of the total number of moles has to be taken into account by an additional
correction term.
A second reason to use mass balances is the fact that many physical properties such as
enthalpies or caloric values of combustibles are given as a function of their mass. The molar
mass which is necessary to transform mass specific values to mole specific data is not always
completely accessible.
3.1.2.3. Volume Fraction, Density and Mass Fraction
Catalytic converter models have to describe a system consisting of two different phases (gas and
solid substrate) with two different volumes. The volume of the gas phase in this system is given
by means of an overall volume fraction. This volume fraction of gas phase in the entire system is
defined as follows:
(9)
where g is the volume fraction of the phase g(as) in the entire volume V. The volume of the solid
phase Vs is evaluated by Vs=(1- g)V = sV. Note, the fluid volume fraction g is identical to the
open frontal area OFA.
If one phase comprises several different species, a cumulative density consisting of the densities
of all species can be defined. For this purpose the next relation is used:
(10)
The density of the entire phase g is the sum of the densities of all different species k in it. In an
additional step the mass fraction wk,g of one species in a system can be defined as the fraction of
the density of the species k,g and the total density g
(11)
The relation given by these two equations defines that the sum of all mass fractions always has
to be equal to one.
3. Theory
3.1.2.4. Equation of State and Ideal Gas Law
If conservation equations for a gaseous phase are given, a general relation between the
intensive variables of the gas is necessary. Pressures and temperatures observed during typical
catalytic converter applications lie within moderate ranges (p<10bar, T<3000K). Thus, the ideal
gas law is sufficient as equation of state in the present models.
(12)
The mass density g is directly proportional to the pressure pg, the total molar mass Mg, and it is
indirectly proportional to the temperature Tg and the ideal gas constant R. The molar mass is a
function of the composition of the different species k in the considered phase:
(13)
Mk,g represents the molar mass of the species k in the gas phase.
where K is the anisotropic heat conduction matrix, kh is the gas-solid heat transfer coefficient,
GSA the geometric surface area per unit volume, Tg and Ts the gas and solid temperature, Sr
the chemical reaction source, V the cell volume, Vs the solid volume part of the cell and As the
surface of the solid part of the cell.
3.1.3.1.1. Anisotropic Heat Conduction Matrix
The presence of channels implies that the conduction does not have the same magnitude in
cross-stream (radial) as in streamwise direction; in other words in the porous medium, the solid
heat conduction is anisotropic.
3.1.3.1.1.1. Anisotropic Conduction Factor
The default approach assumes that crosstream and streamwise solid thermal conductivity
are linearly linked; i.e. they differ only from a so-called anisotropy factor. The matrix solid heat
conduction K reads
(15)
where is the conduction matrix in the genuine catalyst reference frame and Q and its inverse
are transfer matrices from the genuine catalyst reference frame to the Cartesian reference frame.
s is the physical solid thermal conductivity and G is the anisotropic conductivity factor.
10
3. Theory
3.1.3.1.1.2. Effective Thermal Conductivity including Radiation
This approach intends to model the cross-stream thermal conductivity based on the heat transfer
modes that in reality take place in the monolith: conduction and radiation. The following figure
shows the heat transfer modes within a catalyst squared unit cell. The walls have a width
and
d is the hydraulic diameter. The length s is the unit cell width of the catalyst derived from the
density number (cpsi) N as:
.
The heatflux exchanged between faces at temperature T1 and T2 can be written
(16)
where L is the catalyst length and is the effective radial thermal conductivity.
Figure 3. Heat Transfer within a Catalyst Squared Unit Cell
The heatflux is composed of the heat conduction within the wall along length s and width
(flux QL, orange zone in the above figure), the conduction along length
and width d (flux Qs1,
green zone) and the radiation through the channel (flux Qs2, blue zone). Following composition of
thermal resistance rules, the last two are treated in serial and are in parallel with the first one, i.e:
(17)
In the above equation, the radiation term has been linearized and the term between parentheses
is the effective thermal conductivity . This relation describes the heat exchange within a unit
cell. If one assumes thermal equilibrium of all unit cells contained into a mesh cell, the relation
extends to mesh cells as:
(18)
where h is the distance between two mesh cell centers. Based on relation (4) one can build the
anisotropic heat conduction matrix as follows:
(19)
11
3. Theory
3.1.3.1.1.3. Solid Surfaces
The diffusion fluxes must be computed along the solid surface of the cells As . For monoliths with
a preferential flow direction (e.g. monoliths with channel shaped geometry: DPFs, catalysts) the
solid surface vectors are calculated different than for catalytic blocks without any preferential flow
direction (e.g. undirected porosities: packed beds). For the first case one can create the following
assumption:
If one considers a cell face A normal to the main catalyst direction, then
is for the fluid and
the complement for the solid. If one considers a face tangent to the main direction, all the surface
is solid. The solid surface vectors are then computed by the general relation:
(20)
where is the surface reduction matrix in the genuine catalyst reference frame. For the second
case of catalytic blocks with undirected porosities, the surface reduction is uniform in all
directions. Thus, the solid surface vectors are computed by the relation:
(21)
The first term on the right-hand side determines the diffusion coefficient, while the second term
is the cross-diffusion part and is added in the source terms.
is the interpolated cell-face
temperature gradient. dj is the distance between cell centers Pj and Pi.
3.1.3.1.3. Boundary Conditions
As the walls are in contact with the solid part of the catalyst, the thermal wall boundary conditions
are removed from the gas enthalpy equation and added to the solid temperature equation. The
page [12]
boundary fluxes are computed according to the boundary version of the relation (Eq.22
).
The local wall heat transfer coefficient is then proportional to the solid thermal conductivity and
inversely proportional to the wall distance. Post-processing the solid heat transfer coefficient can
be confusing as it can be very high due to the dependence on the wall distance. But it is physical.
When reducing the wall distance the solid heat transfer coefficient increases but the wall to cell
solid temperature difference decreases, giving a wall heat flux of same order.
The interfaces between the catalyst and the gas are presumed adiabatic for the solid
temperature.
3.1.3.2. Source Terms in the Gas Phase Balance Equations
3.1.3.2.1. Sources in the Enthalpy Conservation Equation
The term Sr (W) accounts for heat sources due to catalytic chemical reactions. It is calculated
using the species' reaction rates and the corresponding enthalpies of formation using the
following formula:
(23)
12
3. Theory
The differential conservation equations for mass momentum and energy of a single channel can
be written as shown in the following section.
The continuity equation of the gas phase is
(25)
where g is the density of the gas phase, t is the time, vg is the interstitial gas velocity and z is the
spatial coordinate in axial direction.
The momentum conservation equation is given by the steady-state Darcy equation (see Kaviani
page [96]
[26
])
(26)
where pg is the pressure of the system. The Darcy constant AD can be described by:
(27)
dhyd represents the hydraulic channel diameter and is a friction coefficient. The factor is called
Fanning friction factor and takes into account deviations from round channel cross sections. It
has values as summarized in the following table.
The friction factor is typically described as a function of the Reynolds Number Re and changes
depending on the flow regime (laminar, transition or turbulent):
(28)
13
3. Theory
The bounds for the transition region from laminar to turbulent are set by Reynolds numbers of
Relam = 2300 and Returb = 5000. In the turbulent region, turb is considered as a constant input
value. In the laminar region lam is given by
(29)
where a and b are input values. These two parameters are supplied with default values (a=64,
b=-1) according to the Hagen-Poisseuille-Law for laminar tube flow.
page [97]
Table 3-1: Fanning Friction Factor (see VDI ,Lb7 [64
]
Channel Cross Section
Round
1.00
Square
0.89
Equilateral Triangle
0.83
0.69
wk,g is the mass fraction of species k and Deff is an effective diffusion coefficient. Diffusion is
usually small compared to convection but becomes important for small Peclet numbers of mass
transfer.
represents the molar reaction rate of the catalytic surface reactions with their
stoichiometric coefficients vi,k.
Homogeneous gas phase reactions are not considered, since their rates are negligible in the
temperature range which is typical for automotive applications.
Assuming that viscous dissipation can be neglected, the energy balance of the gas phase is
written as
(31)
where Tg is the gas temperature and h k the total enthalpy of the component k. Conductive heat
transport in the gas phase is modeled by Fourier's law using the thermal conductivity g. This
effect is usually small compared to convection but becomes important for small Peclet numbers
of heat transfer. The third term on the right side takes into account the enthalpy transport due to
species diffusion. kh is the heat transfer coefficient between the gas phase and the solid walls,
and GSA represents the total channel surface area per unit of substrate volume. The heat of
reaction of the catalytic surface reactions is represented by h i . This heat is released in the
solid phase and convected into the gas phase. Thus, the heat of reaction that is implicitly taken
into account by the combined solution of the gas species and energy conservation equations has
to be deducted from the gas phase (minus sign before the last term) and subsequently added to
the solid phase energy balance equation.
14
3. Theory
The solid phase energy balance equation is given by
(32)
where Ts is the temperature of the catalyst wall, s is its thermal conductivity, and
considers
a general radial heat transport between radially distributed channels as they are defined by the
page [15]
Discrete Channel Method (see Section Total and Diffusive Velocity
).
The heat loss to the surrounding is captured with
. There are two different models available:
1. a simplified heat loss model as described in section Boundary Conditions page [19], where the
heat loss of the overall canning and insulation is lumped into a 0D model.
2. In the second modeling approach a 1D model for the multi-layered wall is set-up according
page [65]
to section Multi-Layered Wall Model
.
Thermal radiation is not taken into account in the energy conservation equation due to the low
temperature range, as it is given by 'standard' operation conditions. Thus, radiation does not
significantly affect the exit conversion and ignition/extinction bounds.
Due to the chemical reactions occurring on the surface of a catalyst, the concentrations of the
species directly above the catalytic surface are not equal to the concentration of species in
the bulk. This effect is accounted for by solving additional balance equations for the individual
species concentrations at the solid surface. Therefore it is possible to take into account for the
two cases of chemical and mass transfer limitation.
Under the assumption of quasi steady-state conditions, the rates of the catalytic surface
reactions balance the diffusive transport from the bulk gas to the surface. Thus, the molar surface
L
concentration (c k of the component j can be evaluated using
(33)
where ck,g is the molar concentration of species k in the bulk gas, and kk,m is the mass transfer
coefficient of the individual species.
The amount of a certain species stored on the surface is represented by a surface fraction . The
conservation of this species on the surface is accounted for by the following equation,
(34)
where the product ( GSA) of the site density and the geometrical reaction surface GSA is
a measure for the entire storage capacity. The right hand side of the equations represents a
general reaction term depending on the applied storage model.
3.1.4.1. Total and Diffusive Velocity
In systems where the fluid flow is modeled, the velocity of the system and of different species in
it is an important property. In the current model, the following definition is chosen. One species
moves with its proper velocity vk in one direction of the space domain. The mean velocity (see
Bird et al. [6
page [95]
]) of all the species or the entire continuum is given by the following equation:
(35)
The mean velocity vg is the sum of all species velocities vk,g multiplied by their mass fraction
wk,g. In that way, a mass specific mean velocity or 'mass-averaged velocity' is determined. The
15
3. Theory
difference between the velocity of the mass continuum and that of one single species is called
D
diffusive velocity vk . The mathematical relation is given by:
(36)
D
v k,g represents a general diffusive velocity that has to be quantified by additional diffusion
models. In the presented model Fick's first law of diffusion is used (see Taylor and Krishna [62
page [97]
]). This decision was made due to the fact that in typical catalytic converter applications,
convective fluxes have more influence than diffusive. Thus, errors in the modeling of diffusion
have only minor importance and simplified models are sufficient. Fick's law states that the
D
diffusive velocity vk of a component k of concentration wk,g, across a surface of unit area, is
proportional to the concentration differential multiplied by a system constant Dk, and is expressed
by:
(37)
The heat capacity of the entire gas is defined as partial derivative of the total enthalpy with
respect to temperature assuming constant composition and pressure
(39)
page [95]
Where
Specific heat flow
Thermal conductivity
16
3. Theory
Temperature
3.1.4.4. BOOST Multi-Channel Model and Discrete Channel Method (DCM)
The Discrete-Channel-Method (DCM), developed in BOOST (see Wurzenberger and Peters
page [97]
page [97]
[77
, 76
]) describes the spatial distribution of the converter by locating several
channels along each radial direction as sketched in the following figure.
Figure 5. Setup of Four Radially Distributed Single Channels for 2D Catalyst Simulation
The thermal and fluid dynamic behavior of each channel in the above figure is represented by
conservation equations for mass, momentum and energy as summarized in Section BOOST
page [13]
Balance Equations, Single Channel Model
. Hence, the solution of these differential
balance equations describes the catalytic converter locally very accurately. This can be
understood as solution at fine scale of the individual channel.
The distribution of the temperature (Ts) in the radial directions of an entire catalytic converter as
the coarse scale is assumed to depend on the heat flux through the web walls as shown in Fig. 6
page [17]
.
Figure 6. Radial Heat Transfer in a Catalytic Converter
The comparison of the heat conductivity of the wall material ( s) and the gaseous phase ( g),
respectively, shows that the transport of heat in radial direction through gas and ring walls is
negligible.
On this coarse scale, therefore, the converter can be treated as a homogeneous reactor with
locally dependent heat sources. These heat sources are determined by the catalytic conversion
reactions as described by the single channel model and the fine scale. An analytical investigation
of such radial heat conduction reaction problems, as given by
(43)
The radial distribution of the solid temperature Ts(r) is determined by a polynomial function of the
order M that corresponds to the number of single channels models considered. The polynomial
page [17]
coefficients am are determined by solving Eq.44
with the known temperatures given at
each single channel. Once the radial temperature profile is known, the heat fluxes at arbitrary
positions can be estimated by applying the gradient of this spatial temperature distribution. The
fluxes entering and leaving each channel in radial directions complete the energy balance and
thus, couple the channels. This makes it possible to take into account the spatial behavior of a
17
3. Theory
converter through a spatial distribution of temperatures. The benefit of using the above sketched
page [17]
shape function (Eq.44
) is computational efficiency. By using an analytically derived shape
function within the numerical solution procedure, the solution of the radial temperature profile is
a priori 'pushed' into the right direction and therefore only very few radial grid points (i.e. single
channel simulations) are required to get converged results.
3.1.4.5. Thermodynamic and Transport Properties
Thermodynamic and transport properties are required for the simulation of catalytic converters
page [10]
and the solution of all model equations summarized in Section FIRE Balance Equations
.
In the present model all physical properties of the fluid change with the temperature, pressure
and composition of the gas. The following table briefly summarizes how properties are calculated
and on which reference they are based. For more detailed information see the cited references
and basic literature of fluid mechanics.
Table 3-2: Physical Properties and Calculation Approach
Species
Unit
Reference
Molecular weight
(kmol/kg)
(kJ/(kgK))
page [95]
Thermal conductivity
(W/(mK))
page [97]
Viscosity
(Pas)
page [97]
Diffusion coefficients
(m /s)
], and
], and
page [95]
The properties given above are internally stored by BOOST for a list of 34 species, as given in
the following table. A detailed description of how the fluid properties are treated by FIRE is given
in the Species Transport Manual.
Table 3-3: Gas Species of Internal Database
Species
C2H2
C5H12
H2
NO3
C2H4
C6H10
H2O
C2H6
C6H14
HCl
O2
C3H4
C6H6
OH
C3H6
CH3OH
N2
SO
C3H8
CH4
N2O
SO2
C4H10
CO
NH3
SO3
C4H6
CO2
NO
C4H8
NO2
3. Theory
variables time (t), axial position (z) and radial position (r). In order to solve the entire system,
initial and boundary conditions have to be defined.
3.1.4.6.1. Boundary Conditions
The boundary conditions at the catalyst inlet/outlet in axial directions have to be defined by the
user. For the solution of the continuity and momentum balance equations, the model is set up
in a way that at one side (inlet) a mass flux has to be defined and at the other side (outlet) a
pressure has to be given. If the direction of the flow should change, negative mass fluxes can
be applied. The restriction here is that the simulated pressure drop over the entire catalyst is not
bigger than the pressure at the outlet. Inlet-temperatures and species mass fractions have to be
given for the solution of the energy and species balance equations.
At the outlet either an adiabatic back flow option can be chosen or also outlet temperatures
and species mass fraction can be set. For the solution of the solid energy balance adiabatic
conditions were chosen at the inlet and outlet of the converter.
In radial direction adiabatic boundaries can be chosen or 'heat loss conditions' have to be
defined.
Figure 7. Radial Heat Loss to the Ambient
The overall heat transfer in radial direction, as sketched in the above figure, is evaluated
considering transfer through an insulation material, a shell and a boundary layer. Therefore the
following correlation is applied for overall heat flux given in Watt:
(45)
Where
Overall heat flux
Solid temperature at the border (in 1D simulation this radial dependency is
not required)
Overall heat loss coefficient
Diameter of the monolith
Environment temperature
The overall heat loss coefficient
, is defined by:
(46)
Where
19
3. Theory
Thermal conductivity of the material
Thermal conductivity of the shel
Material position
Shell position
Heat transfer coefficient between the outer surface of the shell and environment
3.1.4.6.2. Initial Conditions
In the present catalytic converter model all initial conditions are derived from the inlet boundary
conditions and set automatically. Thus, if constant boundary conditions of temperatures or
species mass fractions are given, these values are used in order to initialize the entire spatial
domain of the converter. If the boundary conditions change as a function of time, the value
corresponding to the start of integration time is used for the initialization. The initial temperature
of the solid is assumed to be identical to the one of the gas phase. The initial pressure and
velocity field is evaluated using the inlet mass flux, the outlet pressure and the pressure drop of
the entire converter.
BOOST/FIRE offers two different approaches to model heterogeneous reactions. In the standard
model approach, the pore diffusion through the washcoat layer(s) is neglected. This assumption
is valid for unlimited diffusion, where pore diffusion is so fast that every reactant and every
product is uniformly distributed over the whole washcoat layer. This is the reason why the
chemical reaction rate of any reaction i can be related to the catalytic surface area in [kmol/
2
(sm _cat)]. By multiplication with the geometrical surface area GSA, the reaction rate
20
3. Theory
3
page [15]
where wcl is the porosity (gas void fraction) of the considered washcoat layer.
is the density
L
of the gas mixture in the washcoat layer cell, and w k is the mass fraction of species k. The left
hand side describes the transient change of mass of species k in the washcoat layer. The second
term on the right hand side is the species source/sink through chemical reactions, where M k is
the molecular weight of species k, i,k is the stoichiometric coefficient of species k in reaction i,
3
and is the reaction rate per unit volume washcoat [kmol/(sm _wcl)]. The first term on the right
hand side is the diffusive transport of the species. The transport model, as described in section
page [21]
Transport Models
, is used to determine the effective diffusion coefficient Dk,eff.
The boundary condition at the solid surface (y=0) is determined by the balance of diffusive flux
and mass transfer through the boundary layer from the bulk gas to the solid surface and vice
versa, as described by
(48)
leading to no diffusive flux out of the last washcoat layer. The total or entire washcoat layer
thickness wcl,tot is the sum of the individual layer thicknesses wcl,ilay, as described by
(50)
21
3. Theory
diffusion is not dominated by fluid-fluid collisions but it changes to fluid-solid collision driven
diffusion where according to kinetic gas theory the 'Knudsen' diffusion takes place, Froment
page [95]
and Bischoff [14
]. As discussed by the same authors, models for effective pore diffusion
coefficients in porous systems are widely spread in the literature. They reach from simple models
incorporating solely the porosity and tortuosity of solid the structure to complex descriptions of
the pore-network including multi-component diffusion considerations as used in the dusty gas
page [96]
model applied by Khinast [29
].
3.1.5.2.1. Effective Pore Diffusion Model
A simple approach to take into account the hindered molecular movement in the porous medium
is described by the effective pore diffusion model. The interaction of the gas molecules with the
solid walls result in a higher diffusion resistance and longer diffusion paths. The tortuosity wcl
describes the locally averaged ratio of actual diffusion length to direct diffusion length. Thus, the
effective diffusion coefficient Dk,eff of the species is smaller than the free gas diffusion coefficient
Dk,g of species k, as described by the equation
(51)
In the numerical implementation for two-component mixtures Dk,g is the binary diffusion
coefficient, and for multi-component mixtures Dk,g is calculated according to Wilke's approach
(see Froment and Bischoff [14
other species
page [95]
where DKn is the Knudsen diffusion coefficient depending on pore diameter dpor, molar mass M of
the considered species and temperature Ts, as described by the equation
(53)
22
3. Theory
in Eq.47
page [21]
. On
has units of
. Consequently, the converter surface based reaction rates need
to be converted from converter surface based to washcoat volume based units.
This conversion is done by multiplying the converter surface based reaction rates with the
specific reactive surface area per unit volume of washcoat,
in units of
:
(55)
This conversion is valid, but for any calibrated reaction mechanism related to converter surface
its application in a different catalyst model (variation of converter type and/or washcoat thickness)
using the WCL model does not correctly predict the conversion behavior.
In order to resolve this issue either all kinetic parameters would have to be transformed
to washcoat layer volume, which would be a huge effort, or a complete new set of kinetic
parameters would be necessary for the WCL model, which would make the comparison with the
surface reaction model very difficult.
Hence a characteristic number - the reference washcoat layer volume
- may be
introduced with which the conversion of converter surface based reaction rates shall be
simplified.
The reference washcoat layer volume
The reference washcoat layer volume is used to convert reaction rates and a particular set
of kinetic parameters considering the reference converter whose conversion behavior is
characterized by this parameter set. It is denoted by
and shall be defined as the ratio of
washcoat volume to total monolith volume of the reference converter.
can be interpreted
as a reciprocal measure of the noble metal density in the washcoat layer volume.
By taking into account some geometrical transformations, the reference washcoat layer volume
for layer ilay can be calculated with
(56)
where CPSM is the cell density per square meter calculated with CPSM = CPSI / (0.0254) .
The reference washcoat layer volume is used to scale the geometric surface area of a converter
to account for the reference converter's washcoat volume:
(57)
23
3. Theory
Tip: The reference washcoat layer volume determines the reference washcoat layer
volume (thickness) for which the kinetic parameters are valid. If one uses the same
kinetic parameter set, but varies the washcoat layer thicknesses and consequently
the washcoat layer volumes, one has to have the same value of
to obtain
reasonable conversion rates.
Example
An example shall demonstrate the effect of the reference washcoat layer volume in different
page [24]
layer configurations. Fig. 9
shows three catalysts A, B, and C with different washcoat
layer coatings. Only the species conversion in the coating called Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC)
is considered. Unlimited diffusion is assumed and the same set of kinetic reaction parameters
page [23]
of the DOC is applied for all three catalysts. Eq.55
is solved for all species and the
conversion of species k, e.g. C3H6 is compared. In coating INERT present in catalyst C only
diffusion takes place (no chemical reactions).
Figure 9. Example for catalytic conversion in three different washcoat layers
Catalyst A
(Reference
Converter)
Catalyst B
Catalyst C
Specific Converter
2
Surface (m conv)
DOC Washcoat Layer
3
Volume (m wcl)
INERT Washcoat
3
Layer Volume (m wcl)
2
-
To characterize the conversion of the three samples the following two cases shall be highlighted:
1. The absolute amount of noble metals is the same in all samples:
When assuming that the absolute amount of noble metals is the same in catalyst A, B and C
it can be expected that the conversion of C3H6 is the same for all three samples.
The reference washcoat layer volumes for the three samples are:
24
3. Theory
Comparing the overall reaction rate in the DOC layer one finds that all samples lead to the
same C3H6 conversion:
The same result would have been achieved if the reaction rate wouldn't have been
converted using the reference washcoat layer volume of the related reference converter:
Comparing the overall reaction rate in the DOC layer one finds that the expectation is met
when using the proper reference washcoat layer volume:
The reason for this behavior can be found in the way how the kinetic parameters related to the
catalyst surface are transferred into the rates of reactions which take place in a certain washcoat
layer volume. The kinetic parameters contain the information of how many noble metals are
located within the washcoat layer. Using the same parameter set and calculating the specific
25
3. Theory
page [23]
page [95]
th
where are stoichiometric coefficients and is the chemical symbol for the k species. K is the
total number of species (gas phase and stored) in the system, I is the total number of chemical
reactions considered.
The stoichiometric coefficient of species k in reaction i is defined as:
(59)
The rate of production of species k is:
(60)
, and
are the exponents of concentration of the gas phase species in reaction i. For
elementary reactions these exponents are equal to the stoichiometric coefficients:
(62)
The definition of ck,g depends on the phase the species is part of. For gas phase species ideal
gas is assumed.
(63)
26
3. Theory
page [95]
is the equilibrium constant in concentration units for reaction i. Coltrin et al. [12
] notes
that in some cases there are experimental data that indicate the Arrhenius expression for the
reaction rate constant
is modified by the coverage (concentration) of some surface species, as
described by:
(67)
,
, and
are the three coverage parameters for the surface site species k and the reaction
i. The -term enhances the Arrhenius expression so that the pre-exponential factor A and the
activation energy E can be written as:
(68)
where
(70)
(71)
Finally
is obtained from
via:
(72)
For the cases where no stored species are considered the second term in this equation becomes
'1'.
27
3. Theory
3.1.6.1. Sticking Coefficients
For some simple surface reactions, the rate of the reaction can be calculated via the 'sticking
coefficient' formulation. The sticking coefficient expresses the probability that adsorption of the
molecule on the surface takes place (sticking) when a collision occurs.
The sticking coefficient form of the rate equation is allowed for the simple case of a surface
reaction in which there is exactly one gas phase reactant species.
The sticking coefficient is calculated via the following expression:
(73)
The three parameters A i , b i , E i are the Arrhenius parameters, but in this case A i and b i are
dimensionless and E i is in (kJ/(kmolK)).
In order to convert the rate constants given in sticking coefficient formulation to the kinetic rate
constants
the following equation is used:
(74)
where Mk,g is the molecular weight of the reaction gas phase species, tot is the total surface site
concentration and m is the sum of all the stoichiometric coefficients of reactants that are surface
page [26]
species. The rate of progress is calculated using Eq.61
.
where Re is the Reynolds number, Pr is the Prandtl number, and Sc is the Schmidt number. For
channel shaped monoliths dhyd represents the hydraulic channel diameter and l is the channel
length.
For granulated materials (undirected porosities) dhyd represents the characteristic pore length,
e.g. the solid particle diameter while l is meaningless in that case. The transport coefficients for
heat kh and species mass kk,m finally result from
(76)
where, g is thermal conductivity of the gas mixture and Dk,g is the diffusion coefficient of species
k in the gas mixture.
3.1.7.1. Transfer Coefficients for Directed Porosities
For laminar flow in circular catalyst channels, literature offers a plethora of functional
relationships to calculate the actual Nusselt and Sherwood numbers as a function of catalyst
length and operating conditions. Most of them are based on the definition of the dimensionless
Graetz numbers for heat and mass transfer:
(77)
28
3. Theory
3.1.7.1.1. Sieder/Tate
page [97]
FIRE/BOOST suggests the Sieder/Tate relationship (see Perry[56
]) as a default:
(78)
In addition to the Sieder/Tate approach, FIRE offers additions to the Nusselt/Sherwood relations.
3.1.7.1.2. Hausen
page [97]
The more general Hausen equation (Perry [56
]) is described by
(79)
3.1.7.1.3. Hawthorn
page [95]
The Hawthorn's equation which is suggested by more recent papers (i.e. Ahn et al. [1
]) is
described by:
(80)
29
3. Theory
3.1.7.2. Transfer Coefficients for Undirected Porosities
FIRE offers the possibility to simulate the reactive flow through undirected porosities like packed
beds or granulated materials. These materials are represented by undirected porosities with
arbitrary flow direction through the pores. The following models for the heat and mass transfer
coefficients are available:
3.1.7.2.1. VDI Packed Bed
The transfer coefficient in a packed bed increases within the first particle layers and approaches
a final value rapidly. The heat transfer coefficient in packed beds consisting of spheres of uniform
size is much higher than that of a single sphere. The reason for this is the production of swirl
when the fluid flows through the interstices between the spheres.
page [95]
As described in the book for Baehr and Stephan [2]
, the averaged Nusselt number in the
packed bed is proportional to the Nusselt number of a single sphere Nusph:
(82)
The shape factor
according to equation
(83)
page [30]
Eq.82
can be also applied for packed beds consisting of non-spherical particles. In
page [97]
VDI [64]
(Chapter Gh) one can found a list for the shape factors of different particle
geometries:
Table 3-4: Shape Factor of Packed Beds
Particle
valid for
1.6
Cube
1.6
0.6
Raschig ring
2.1
Pr = 0.7, Sc = 0.6
page [95]
Pr, Sc
1300
The Reynolds number Re is calculated with the equivalent particle diameter dP and the interstitial
velocity vg, as described by
(85)
For non-spherical particles, dP is defined as the diameter of a sphere with the same surface area
as the particle. If the specific surface area GSA and the number of particles per unit volume nP
are known, dP is simple determined by
(86)
30
3. Theory
The Sherwood number for the mass transfer coefficient is calculated by applying the analogy
of heat and mass transfer by replacing Nusselt with Sherwood number as well as Prandtl with
Schmidt number. The Sherwood number of the packed bed is proportional to the Sherwood
number of the single sphere, as described by
(87)
The Sherwood number of the single sphere
can be calculated by
(88)
where
is the droplet velocity. During a time step
, the spray particle motion is calculated
within a subcycling loop, each iteration of this loop being associated with a specific parcel time
step
.
Following O'Rourke, one assumes that the probability
that n collisions occur between the
droplet and the porous medium follows a Poisson distribution
(90)
31
3. Theory
In the porous medium, the role of Twall is played by the solid temperature Ts.
One cannot use the wallfilm model within the reactive porosity because the liquid film must
be generated on the wall boundary faces of the mesh while the porous domain is essentially
composed of internal faces and cells. Therefore the modeling of deposition is not easy. In a
first approximation, the regimes lying below the adimensioned temperature T* - which include
deposition - are neglected and we assume that a particle undergoes only rebound or thermal
breakup.
In the case of thermal breakup, one assumes that the whole mass of the incident particles
goes into the secondary droplets. One then uses the Kuhnke correlations to estimate the mass,
diameter and velocity of these droplets. Mass conservation is ensured by adapting the number of
droplets in parcel in the secondary droplets. The number ns of secondary droplets per collision is
a calculation parameter.
The angle of the collision is calculated randomly by a Gaussian law assuming the normalto-the-wall collision is the most probable (top of the Gaussian curve). This angle is used for
the determination of several characteristics of the rebound/secondary droplets. However, the
direction of the droplet extracted from this estimation is not directly used because the probability
to obtain droplets moving back to the inlet would be too high and this is not realistic. Instead a
transformation is performed, imposing that the direction of the droplet(s) after collision is oriented
with a maximum angle max from the gas direction. The max angle is reached when normal
collision is selected from the Gaussian law (a in the following figure). On the other hand the angle
is zero when a tangential collision occurs (b in the following figure). This generates a cone of
possible directions with the gas direction as the centerline and the angle selected randomly from
the Gaussian law. Furthermore the direction of the rebound/secondary droplets orthogonal to the
gas direction is calculated randomly.
32
3. Theory
Figure 11. Droplet Direction after Collision in Porous Medium
left: angles calculated from Gaussian law, right: angles used in the interaction submodel
3.1.8.3. Enhancement of Evaporation & Energy Redistribution
In some devices that can be modeled via the reactive porosity approach - such as wiremesh
mixers - the spray evaporation is enhanced compared to the evaporation level in free gas flow. In
FIRE the spray model includes evaporation and thermolysis enhancement parameters which act
on reactive porosity regions and can be modified by the user.
Using these evaporation enhancement parameters can lead to a rapid decrease of gas
temperature and consequently to a quite limited thermolysis of urea. In order to reduce this side
effect, one takes into consideration the idea that the energy used to evaporate the liquid might
come partly from the solid and partly from the gas.
The spray energy source added to the gas enthalpy ( ) equation is calculated as follows:
(92)
The first term on the right hand side is the enthalpy source associated to the gain of vapor
mass. Its numerical discretization is implicit. The second term Senerg is the enthalpy source
exchanged between the liquid and gas phases, including the heat exchange due to the difference
of temperature between liquid and gas, and to the latent heat of evaporation. The numerical
treatment is explicit.
The redistribution of the source term to gas and solid enthalpy equations reads:
(93)
where is the porosity (gas volume fraction) and e is a tuning parameter. The function f is
continuous with regards to both and e. For example, for =0 (full solid) the function is zero and
all energy required for the evaporation is extracted from the solid and vice versa for =1 (full gas).
For e =0, the function equals 1 and all energy is extracted from the gas. For high values of e,
the function tends to zero.
Note that this treatment influences only the sources terms of the gas and solid enthalpy
equations. The spray evaporation routine, which makes use of the gas enthalpy and gas
temperature and modifies them locally, is not changed with respect to the use of solid enthalpy.
3.1.9. Nomenclature
Units
a
(-)
ai
Arrhenius parameter
(variable)
am
33
3. Theory
A
(-)
Ai
(variable)
AD
Darcy Constant
(kg/(m s))
AS
(m )
2
2
(m _cat/m _wcl)
(-)
bi
(-)
ci
Arrhenius parameter
(kJ/kmol)
(kmol/m )
ck,g
(kmol/m )
cp,k
(kJ/(kmolK))
cp
(kJ/(kmolK))
cp,s
(kJ/(kgK))
CPSI
(1/in )
CPSM
(1/m )
Diameter
(m)
dmat
(m)
dmon
(m)
dP
(m)
dshell
(m)
Dk,g
(m /s)
Deff
(m /s)
dd
Droplet diameter
(m)
dp
(m)
Ei
(kJ/kmol)
(-)
Fo
(-)
(-)
GSA
(m /m )
Gzmass
(-)
GSA
(m /m )
hg
(kJ/kmol)
hk,g
(kJ/kmol)
ck
34
3
3
2
2
3. Theory
Hf,k
(kJ/kmol)
Hk
(kJ/kmol)
hi
Heat of reaction i
(kJ/kmol)
Hi
Enthalpy of reaction i
(kJ/kmol)
kh
(W/(m K))
kk,m
(m/s)
kf i
(variable)
kr i
(variable)
kout
(W/(m K))
K-number (adimensioned)
(-)
(W/(mK))
Kci
(variable)
Kpi
(variable)
(m)
La
Laplace number
(-)
(-)
(kg)
Mg
(kg/kmol)
Mk,g
(kg/kmol)
(-)
ns
(-)
nP
(1/m )
Cell density
(1/in ), (1/cm )
Nu
Nusselt Number
(-)
OFA
pg
Pressure
(Pa)
P0
Probability of no collision
(-)
Pn
(-)
Pr
Prandtl number
(-)
(kmol/(m s))
Heat flux
(W/(m K))
Rotation matrix
(-)
(W/m)
g)
(m /m )
35
3. Theory
r
Radial coordinate
(m)
(kmol/(m s))
(kmol/(m _cats))
(kmol/(m _wcls))
(kmol/(m _cats))
(kmol/(m s))
(m)
(kJ/(kmolK))
Re
Reynolds number
(-)
Ro
(-)
(m)
(m )
Sg
(W)
Ss
(W)
Senerg
(W)
Sk
Entropy of species k
(kJ/(kmolK))
Sr
(W)
Sw,k
(kg)
Sc
Schmidt number
(-)
Sh
Sherwood number
(-)
Entropy of reaction i
(kJ/kmol)
Time
(s)
(s)
Tenv
Environment temperature
(K)
Tg
Gas temperature
(K)
Ts
Solid temperature
(K)
Tsat
Saturation temperature
(K)
Twall
Wall temperature
(K)
T*
(-)
ud
Droplet velocity
(m/s)
vg
(m/s)
Si
t
td
36
3. Theory
vk,g
(m/s)
vk,g
(m/s)
(m )
Vg
(m )
Vs
(m )
(m /m )
(m /m )
We
Weber number
(-)
yk,g
(mol/mol)
(m)
(m)
3
3
3
3
Greek Letters
c
(-)
(-)
out
(W/m )
(-)
(mol/m )
(m)
wall
(m)
wcl
(m)
(-)
(m /m )
(-)
(-)
Friction factor
(-)
(-)
(-)
mat
(W/(mK))
(W/(mK))
(W/(mK))
tot
s
wcl
k
37
3. Theory
Thermal conductivity of the shell
(W/(mK))
(W/(mK))
Viscosity
(Pas)
(-)
k,g
(kg/m )
(kg/m )
Solid density
(kg/m )
Collision frequency
(-)
(-)
(-)
(deg)
Site density
(kmol/m )
(-)
shell
i,k
max
wcl
3
3
3
Indices
38
ambient
Ambient
Bulk gas
cat
Catalyst
Darcy
Diffusion
eff
Effective
env
Environment
Forward
Gas
Heat
hyd
Hydraulic
Reaction index
ilay
Kgas
Kstor
3. Theory
lam
Laminar
Lay
loss
mass
Mass
mat
Insulation mat
mon
Monolith
out
Outside
por
Pore
Reverse
rad
Radial
reac
Reaction
Solid substrate
shell
Shell
sph
Sphere
stor
Storage
tot
Total
trans
Transfer
turb
Turbulent
wall
Wall
wcl
Washcoat layer
page [224]
page [144]
3.2.1. Introduction
Modeling and numerical simulation of diesel particulate filters (DPF) has been performed for
page [96]
many years. Konstandopoulos et al. [39
] presented an overview of the state-of-the-art and
progress in diesel particulate filter simulation. The models reach from simple analytically solvable
page [96]
page [97]
pressure drop correlation (e.g. Konstandopoulos et al., [41
]; Ogyu et al., [52
])
over a broad variety of 1D filter flow and regeneration models to 3D models considering one
page [96]
representative pair of filter channels with CFD methods (e.g. Konstandopoulos et al. [43
];
page [95]
Guo and Zhang, [18
]). Focusing on 1D models in literature, one can roughly distinguish
between different approaches describing the DPF flow and different concepts to capture the
page [95]
effect of soot regeneration. Bissett [9
] presented a steady-state and isothermal flow
39
3. Theory
model assuming that the thickness of the soot layer is small compared to the channel width.
page [96]
page [96]
Koltsakis and Stamatelos [31
] or Konstandopoulos et al. [38
] chose the same
page [97]
simplification in their publications. Mohammed et al. [51
] applied a model from Huynh
page [96]
page [97]
et al. [24
] considering the impact of depth and cake filtration (see Opris [54
])
page [95]
regimes on the pressure drop during transient loading phases. Gaiser and Mucha [16
]
investigated the influence of ash and different ash distributions on the filter pressure drop. A
regeneration model considering bare trap, and catalytically supported regeneration mechanisms
page [96]
page [96]
was applied by Konstandopoulos et al. [38
]. Millet et al. [49
] presented a soot
page
oxidation mechanism taking into account the impact of fuel additive. Haralampous et al. [19
[95]
] extended a soot regeneration approach by catalytic conversion reactions as they take place
in the wall of coated filters.
The Particulate Filter (PF) model implemented in BOOST/FIRE combines in one overall solution
the most detailed and pragmatic approaches for filter flow, soot filtration and regeneration
proposed by several different research groups in the literature. In addition, the model offers
extended approaches to take into account the influence of ash and asymmetric channel
structures.
As shown in the sketch, soot is split into two distinct layers a depth filtration and a cake filtration
layer and therefore the model distinguishes between soot located within the porous filter wall
and soot forming a cake above it. With the introduction of distinct depth and cake layer balance
equations the regeneration behavior of coated filters can additionally be modeled in a more
precise way. An increased soot combustion rate can be simulated in the depth filtration layer
by applying catalytically supported regeneration mechanisms. As soon as the amount of soot
in the depth layer is smaller than the maximum load, two different approaches can be chosen.
Either soot from the cake layer slides down and therefore also converts catalytically, or the cake
layer remains and cavities develop until the entire depth layer is converted. The second approach
typically shows smaller overall conversion rates since only the amount of soot in the depth layers
is exposed to the faster catalytic reaction scheme.
40
3. Theory
Ash, which may be present in aged filters, is treated in the model as ash plug at the end of the
inlet channel, as ash cake layer over the entire length of the filter, or as combination of both.
The presence of an ash layer increases the overall pressure drop as there is additional flow
resistance and a reduced free frontal surface in the inlet channel. In models where soot needs
to be described by a depth and cake filtration layer, the ash layer can be understood as barrier
between the two soot layers. Thus, soot cannot be deposited in the depth filtration layer as soon
as an ash layer is present. The existence of an ash plug leads to a reduced effective filtration
length and therefore to an increased pressure drop. The effective filtration length is also reduced
by the length of the inlet and outlet plugs. Compared to the entire length, these two lengths are
typically negligible. In order to provide a most generic model, they are included in BOOST/FIRE.
Assuming that radial gradients (within the channels and the entire monolith) are of minor
importance, a transient 1D model in axial direction z is sufficient to describe the entire thermo
and fluid dynamics.
A comparison of the time scales given by the entire filter system, in particular by the flow
velocities and by the growth of the soot layer, reveals that the gas phase processes can be
assumed as quasi-steady. Thus, the present model distinguishes between two sub-models for:
filter flow
soot deposition/ regeneration
The two sub-models, discussed in the following, are also treated separately in their numerical
solution procedures. The individual solutions are updated on a given time step basis and coupled
page [57]
with the help of a lumped filter model (see Section Modeling Glueing Zones in SIC PFs
).
3.2.2.1. Cell Structures of Particulate Filters
The Honeycomb-type cell structure of particulate filters consist of hundreds (thousands) of
individual channels. The most common PF types have squared inlet and outlet channels, as
shown in the following figure. There, the numbers of inlet and outlet channels are identical and
the geometry is defined by the channel diameters d1 and d2, respectively.
In the case of filters composed of individual segments, like the SiC filter, the growth of ash/soot
behaves differently depending on the location of the considered inlet channel. Inlet channels
directly adjacent to the cement stripes have either three or, if they are located in the corners, two
active filtration walls. Consequently, the PF model should be able to consider the impact of the
different channel geometries on loading and regeneration.
Figure 13. PF Structure made of Single Segments
The PF model of BOOST/FIRE can handle many different channel geometries. While the channel
shape of the outlet channels guiding the gas out of the PF is of minor importance, the channel
shape of the inlet channels is significant, since it determines the formation and structure of the
soot and ash layers. Thus, for the correct calculation of the soot and ash heights, a detailed
specification of the inlet channel geometry is necessary. For the calculation of the outlet channel
flow velocity, the heat transfer and the outlet channel pressure drop, it is enough to specify
the outlet channel cross-section and the outlet channel perimeter. The general PF approach
of BOOST/FIRE can handle any inlet channel geometry which can be reproduced by multiple
reflection of a general quadrilateral (see the following figure), here called General Symmetry
Element (GSE). The GSE is the geometrical base of all PF channel geometries in BOOST/FIRE.
The following figure shows the GSE and the unity cell for a PF with octagonal inlet channels. The
unity cell determines the smallest repetitive element for reflection to represent the PF geometry
consisting of inlet and outlet channels.
41
3. Theory
In the present example the unity cell is defined by a square and contains a single outlet channel
and a single inlet channel (four times one fourth of an inlet channel). The general symmetry
element of the octagonal inlet channel is drawn on the right hand side in the following figure. It
is defined by the center corner angle + , the right corner angle , the left corner angle , and
the side lengths on the wall, l1 and l2. The octagonal inlet channel requires eight GSEs to obtain
the specified geometry. Thus, the number of general symmetry elements per inlet channel nC is
eight.
Figure 14. Unity Cell and General Symmetry Element in a PF with Octagonal Inlet Channels
Another example for hexagonal inlet and outlet channels is shown in the following figure. The
unity cell is an equilateral hexagon containing a single outlet and two inlet channels. The inlet
channel with the side lengths, a and b, is produced by reflecting the GSE six times. PFs with
page [95]
hexagonal channel shape are further discussed by Becker et al. [5
].
Figure 15. Unity Cell and General Symmetry Element in a Hexahex PF
By variation of the specification parameters of the general symmetry element, one can
obtain many different inlet channel geometries, e.g. squared, hexagonal, octagonal, n-gonal,
rectangular, etc. The following figure shows the soot and ash layers in an arbitrary general
symmetry element where sc and ac represent soot cake and ash heights respectively. sd
represents the soot height in the depth filtration layer. The free perimeter of the empty inlet
channel is defined by the equation
(94)
and the cross-section of the inlet channel is defined by the cross-section of the single general
symmetry element AGSE and the number of GSE per inlet channel nC, as described by
(95)
To consider the case where not the entire side length is available for filtration, the reduced side
lengths and are applied. They can be expressed as fraction of the actual side lengths, as
described by
(96)
where Feff,1 and Feff,2 are filtration efficiency factors. These factors are model parameters and
allow to take into account the reduced soot and ash deposition along channel walls which
are not located adjacent to an outlet channel. For example, since in the inlet channel of the
Hexahex PF, depicted in the previous figure, is located adjacent to another inlet channel, it can
be expected that only a fraction of its side length is used for filtration.
42
3. Theory
Figure 16. Soot and Ash Layers in the General Symmetry Element
The next two figures show the general symmetry elements together with the soot and ash layers
for selected types of inlet channels.
The following figure demonstrates that the three different channel types in segmented PFs
leading to four, three, and two active filtration walls can be applied by adequate specifications of
the GSEs.
Figure 17. General Symmetry Elements of PF Inlet Channels with 4 (left), 3 (middle), and 2 (right) Filtra
The following figure shows the GSEs for two different hexagonal and for one octagonal inlet
channel.
Figure 18. General Symmetry Elements of Hexagonal PF inlet Channels a-b-a-b-a-b (left), a-a-b-b-a-a (m
The following table gives an overview of the different channel geometries and their specification
parameters, which can be specified by the GSE approach in the PF model of BOOST/FIRE.
Table 4-1: GSE Parameters for Different Inlet Channel Geometry Types
Nr.
Inlet channel
geometry type
nc
l1
Square (a a a a)
90
90
90
Rectangular (a b a b)
90
90
90
Hexagonal (Hexahex)
(a b a b a b)
60
90
90
l2
43
3. Theory
a
90
60
90
45
90
90
90
67.5
Hexagonal Hex3
(a a b a a b)
Octagonal, alternating
(a b a b a b a b)
Octagonal, double
side (a a b b a a b b)
N-gonal, equilateral
(a a . . . . . a)
90
90
N-gonal, alternating
a b (a b a . . . . b)
90
90
Square, 2 sided (a a)
10
Square, 3 sided (a a a)
11
Rectangular, 2 sided (a b)
12
Rectangular,
3 sided (a b a)
67.5
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
Based on the inlet channel geometry, given by the general symmetry element, the PF solver of
BOOST/FIRE determines the free channel cross-section. Furthermore, for a given ash mass
distribution overlain with a soot mass distribution (varying during the loading and regeneration
process), the heights of the soot and ash layers are calculated. The layer heights strongly
influence the transition velocity of the exhaust gas through the filter wall and consequently the
pressure drop of the PF as well as the progress of the regeneration.
3.2.2.2. Main Geometry Parameters of Particulate Filters
The cell density of a PF is defined by the CPSI number indicating the total number of Channels
Per Square Inch. One can distinguish between the cell density of the inlet channels CPSIinl and
the cell density of the outlet channels CPSIout, where the sum has to satisfy the equation
(97)
The cell density per square meter CPSM is defined by
(98)
In general a unity cell contains Iinl inlet channels and Iout outlet channels. Consequently the
CPSM numbers of the inlet and outlet channels are determined by the equations
(99)
and
(100)
44
3. Theory
page [44]
page [44]
(101)
The total open frontal area is obtained from the sum of OFAInl and OFAOut, as described by
(104)
The heat transfer between solid and gas as well as the wall flow are mainly influenced by
the overall geometrical surface area (GSA) of the PF. For the determination of the GSA the
perimeters of both, the inlet and outlet channels are considered. The GSA of all inlet channels is
described by
(105)
The total geometrical surface area is obtained by the sum of the individual GSAs for inlet and
outlet, GSAInl and GSAOut, as described by
(107)
45
3. Theory
Figure 19. Squared Cell PF with Asymmetric Cell Structure
is given by
(108)
where w is the thickness of the substrate wall and wc is the thickness of the washcoat. The
repeat distance s for structures with different channel diameters is given by
(109)
and determines the side length of the unity cell. d1 and d2 represent the diameters of the inlet and
outlet channel, respectively. The cross section of the unity cell simply equals
(110)
and the perimeters of the inlet and outlet channels are described by
(111)
The numbers of inlet and outlet channels per unity cell, Iinl and Iout, are two, respectively. By
page [44]
page [45]
page [46]
combining Eq.99
, Eq.101
and Eq.110
, one obtains the correlation between
the cell density and the cell distance s by the equation
(112)
With the calculated hydraulic diameters BOOST/FIRE further evaluates the open frontal area
(OFA) and the geometric surface area (GSA) with respect to the inlet channel, with respect to the
page [45]
page [45]
outlet channel and with respect to both channels. Based on Eq.102
, Eq.103
and
page [45]
Eq.104
the open frontal areas are described by
(115)
46
3. Theory
page [45]
, Eq.106
page [45]
and Eq.107
page [45]
(116)
The OFA considering both channel diameters defines the solid fraction of the filter that is used in
the energy balance equations. The GSA is used to specify the heat transfer between the gas and
solid phase.
3.2.2.4. Soot and Ash Layer Geometries of Squared Channels
This section describes the layer geometries leading to correlations for the soot and ash heights
of the squared channels. The correlations for other inlet channel geometries, e.g. hexagonal or
octagonal, are derived in an analogous manner.
page [48]
The solution of the filter wall flow model (see Section Filter Flow Model
) and soot/ash
deposition and regeneration model (see Section Deposition and Regeneration of Soot and
page [52]
Ash
) requires a correlation between the soot/ash loading (mass per filter volume) and
the height of the soot depth layer, ash and soot cake. These values depend, beside the above
mentioned geometrical issues, on the number of active filtration walls per inlet channel. For
PFs made out of cordierite the value of active filtration walls per inlet channel is normally four. If
SiC PFs are considered, this value depends on the position related to the glueing stripes (e.g.
page [41]
cement) which connect the single segments. As shown in Fig. 13
, inlet channels which
are directly adjacent to the cement stripes have either three or, if they are located in the corners,
two active filtration walls. Inlet channels which are not in close vicinity to the glueing stripes have
four filtration walls.
Simple geometrical considerations are applied to calculate the heights of the soot depth, ash and
soot cake layer considering these geometrical constraints.
The height of the soot in the depth filtration layer of a channel with 4 filtration walls is given by
(117)
where msd is the soot loading in the depth layer, Afront represents the frontal surface of the filter.
n1 is the number of inlet channels (four, three, or two), sd is the packing density of the soot in the
depth layer, nfw is the number of active filtration walls and d1 represents the diameter of the inlet
channel. The soot packing density in the depth layer is derived from the maximum depth filtration
loading and the corresponding depth layer thickness. Thus, this density should to be viewed as a
scaling factor rather than as a real physical density value.
page [50]
Assuming that the cake layers of soot and ash form a trapezoidal shape (see Fig. 20
), the
soot cake height for an inlet channel is given by
(118)
47
3. Theory
where msc is the soot cake loading, and sc represents the packing density of the cake. mac,layer
is the local ash loading deposited in the ash layer and ac represents the packing density of the
ash cake. The geometrical factors Fnfw,1 and Fnfw,2 depend on the number of active filtration walls
in the inlet channel. Fnfw,1 is 1 for four filtration walls, 1.5 for three filtration walls and 2 for two
filtration walls. The corresponding values for Fnfw,2 are 1, 2 and 4 respectively.
The height of the ash layer ac required in this equation can be further derived from
(119)
The amount of ash in the layer is calculated by the total amount of ash, mac, and a layer-plugdistribution factor lpd. This factor is defined by
(120)
where VPF is the volume of the entire filter and OFAinl represents the open frontal area evaluated
page [46]
with respect to the inlet channel diameter (see Eq.115
). The calculated ash plug length
page [40]
together with any specified length of inlet/outlet plugs (see Fig. 12
) is also used in order to
derive the effective filtration length in the PF.
As sketched in Fig. 12
, the entire filter can be split into several flow regions. These are
regions for the inlet/outlet flow, regions for the channel flow neighboring plugs and the region
for the effective filtration flow. The first two regions are described by algebraic corrections
page [51]
summarized in Section Overall Pressure Drop and Pressure Drop Contributions
. The
latter is described by 1D steady-state balance equations of continuity and momentum for a
representative pair of inlet and outlet channels.
3.2.3.1. 1D Continuity and Momentum Balance
3.2.3.1.1. General Conservation Equations
The steady-state continuity equations of the gas phase in the inlet and outlet channel is
(123)
(124)
where g,n is the density of the gas phase and vg,n is the gas velocity in the inlet (n=1) and outlet
(n=2) channel, respectively. z is the spatial coordinate in axial direction.
48
3. Theory
AF,n represents the free channel cross section that is available for the gas flow. This cross
section is constant in the outlet channel but changes in the inlet channel depending on the local
height of the ash and soot cakes. It is essential to have AF,1 inside the spatial derivative. Soot
loadings up to 20 g/l lead to significant reductions of the free inlet channel cross-section (see
page [96]
Millet et al. [49
]) and therefore the complete neglect of the cake height may lead to oversimplified models.
PS,n is the wet perimeter of the free channel cross section of the nth channel. This value is
constant in the outlet channel but also changes in the inlet channel as a function of the cake
height. vw,n represents the wall velocity lateral to the axial direction. The difference between the
wall velocity of inlet vw,1 and of the outlet channel vw,2 at the same axial position can be derived
by continuity considerations as discussed later in this section.
The steady-state momentum balance equations of the gas phase in the pair of channels is given
by
(125)
(126)
where g,n represents the pressure in the inlet and outlet channel, respectively. The frictional
pressure loss along the channels is approached as a linear function of the local channel velocity
page [49]
scaled by a friction coefficient Fn and the dynamic viscosity . The last term of Eq.125
describes a momentum sink due to mass sinks in the inlet channel. The term can be understood
as additional contribution to the channel friction and therefore is often dropped in literature.
Nevertheless, omitting this term in inviscid flows (F1 1) leads to an increase of the stagnation
pressure over the filter length, and therefore breaks the second law of thermodynamics.
3.2.3.1.2. Squared Channel Structure
Under the assumption of a squared cell structure, the free channel cross section and the wet
perimeter of the two channels are derived from geometrical considerations according to
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
dn is the diameter of the individual channels. sc and ac represent the heights of the soot and ash
cake and Fnfw,A, Fnfw,B and Fnfw,C are again geometrical factors, which distinguish between inlet
channels with four, three and two active filtration walls. The corresponding values for a channel
with four, three or two active filtration walls are 4, 3 and 2 for Fnfw,A , 8, 4, and 2 for Fnfw,B and 4, 2
and 1 for Fnfw,C, respectively.
page [43]
page [43]
For non-squared channel geometries (see Fig. 17
and Fig. 18
), the required
geometrical parameters, AF,1, AF,2, PS,1, and PS,2, are determined in an analogous manner.
3.2.3.2. Wall Flow and Wall Pressure Drop
The inlet and outlet channels are connected by the porous wall through which the gas passes,
whereupon the filtered soot builds a depth filtration and cake layer. This porous media flow
is described by Darcy's law assuming that the pressure drop is a linear function of the local
49
3. Theory
flow velocity. For squared channels, the cake (ash or soot) builds a trapezoidal shape, as
sketched in the following figure. Deviations from this cake geometry, given especially in the
corners of non-squared channels, are lumped into the trapezoidal shape. This approximation
seems reasonable since the cake grows over the entire internal surface area of the inlet channel
page [97]
(compare experimental investigations from Ogyu et al., [52
]). This issue is also addressed
page [96]
in more detail by Konstandopoulos et al. [39
], who concluded that the flow follows the path
with the lowest resistance which is not necessarily the smallest geometrical distance between the
inlet and outlet channel.
Figure 20. Soot and Ash Cake
Assuming that changes of the gas density are negligible over the cake height, a continuity
consideration leads to the flow velocity expressed by
(131)
where x describes the coordinate from top of the cake down to the wall. The wall velocity entering
the outlet channel is one solution of the previous equation where additionally changing gas
densities in the inlet and outlet channel are taken into account
(132)
The total 'wall pressure drop' is the sum of individual pressure drops given by the wall, a soot
depth filtration layer, an ash cake layer and a soot cake layer. The application of Darcy's law over
the different layers with their individual flow velocities leads to
(133)
where kw, ksd, kac and ksc represent the permeability of the wall, the soot depth layer, the
ash cake and soot cake layer, respectively. Assuming that the depth filtration height is small
compared to the entire wall thickness, the latter is held constant in the applied pressure drop
correlation.
Soot Permeability
page
When setting the soot permeability to "Formula" in the GUI, ksc is calculated according to [41
[96]
]:
50
3. Theory
(134)
where f( ) is the Kuwabara function, is the porosity, dprimary is the primary particle diameter,
SCF is the Stokes-Cunningham Factor, Kn the Knudsen number and the gas mean free path.
is evaluated using the following equation:
(135)
where
is the kinematic viscosity of the exhaust gas, and MW is the molecular weight.
(142)
51
3. Theory
where the pressure differences from one position z in the filter to inlet and outlet, respectively,
are evaluated and averaged over the entire effective filter length.
Outside the effective filtration length there are two regions where pure channel flow can be
assumed. This is the entrance region in the inlet channel adjacent to the inlet channel plug and
the rear region in the outlet channel neighboring the outlet and ash plug. Assuming laminar flow,
the pressure drops for both regions are given by
(143)
(144)
where is a general channel shape factor. For squared channels is typically 0.89, for
hexagonal channels 0.95, and for octagonal channels 0.98.
is the length of the inlet and
outlet plug and
represents the length of the ash plug.
At the inlet and outlet of the filter, changing cross sections lead to contraction and expansion
effects of the flow. In order to describe additional pressure losses caused by the flow acceleration
and slowdown, two correlations are considered in the present model. These are
(145)
(146)
where the given dynamic pressure is scaled by a general friction loss coefficient .
The total pressure drop over the entire filter is simply the sum of the individual pressure losses
page [51]
page [52]
given by Eq.140
to Eq.145
. The pressure drops given by the plug regions are
typically small compared to the proper filter pressure drop.
The inlet and outlet pressure losses, on the contrary, have a decisive impact on higher mass
flows because of their quadratic velocity dependency.
3. Theory
(147)
(148)
where msc(z) and msd(z) are the volume specific soot mass (soot loading with respect to the
filter volume) in the cake and depth layer at each axial position of the filter, respectively. Rsd
and Rsc describe general soot reaction source terms in the different layers. vw,dl(z) represents a
page [53]
dimensionless wall velocity (see Eq.149
) at each axial position, and msoot,inl is the specific
soot mass flow entering the filter. Ssd is a binary switch to steer soot deposition in the depth
filtration layer. Soot deposition in the depth layer is switched off as soon as an ash or soot cake
is present or the depth filtration capacity is reached. The binary switch Ssc controls the soot
deposition in the cake layer. Soot deposition in the cake is switched on as soon as the depth
filtration layer has reached its full capacity. The application of switches to steer the soot loading
either in depth or cake layers needs to be understood as a coarse phenomenological approach.
Under the assumption that all soot particulates follow the streamlines in the inlet channel, the wall
velocity can be used as 'weighting function' in order to distribute the entire incoming soot mass
over the effective filter length. Therefore a dimensionless wall velocity defined by
(149)
is used in the present approach. The crucial characteristic of the new velocity is that its shape
is similar to the original velocity and that its integral sum over the entire effective filter length is
equal to one. With this approach it is possible to describe the effect that higher soot deposition
rates are given at spatial locations with lower soot heights (i.e. lower pressure drops and higher
wall velocities).
3.2.4.2. LLD Concept and Regeneration Reactions
The soot regeneration and catalytic wall reaction schemes summarized in Section Filter
page [90]
page [92]
Regeneration with Oxygen
- Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
comprises soot
combustion and catalytic conversion reactions to describe:
Bare trap regeneration with O2
fuel additive regeneration
low temperature regeneration with NO2
catalytically supported NO2 regeneration
CSF conversion of CO, C3H6, C3H8 and NO in the catalytic filter wall and in the outlet
channel
CSF Selective Catalytic Reduction in the catalytic filter wall and in the outlet channel
3.2.4.2.1. Soot Regeneration and CSF Reactions in the filter wall
The reaction schemes take place along the streamlines of gas flow passing through the soot
cake layer, the soot depth layer and the wall. Provided that transport effects are negligible in
directions other than those given by the wall velocity, a 1D isothermal steady-state fixed-bed
page [52]
model (direction x in Fig. 21
) can be applied for small soot slices (Local Layers) given
by an axial discretization. The advantage of this Local Layer Discretization is its computational
performance and its flexible application to various types of reaction mechanisms taking place
with different reaction layers.
The balance equation for the gas phase continuity is given by
(150)
53
3. Theory
where vw is the wall velocity at each axial position, g is the gas density and x represents the
spatial coordinate over the height of the soot cake, soot depth layer and filter wall. Mj is the molar
mass of the species j and S denotes the total number of species. The stoichiometric coefficient of
the species j in there action i is given by i,j that multiplies the molar reaction rate r i (yg,Ts) of the
ith reaction.
The total number of reactions is represented by R. Catalytic conversion without surface storage
reactions have no impact on the global continuity of the gas phase. Reactions where solid soot or
stored solid species are involved contribute to the continuity source. Thus, the right-hand side of
page [53]
Eq.150
directly equals to changes of the solid soot/stored solid species mass.
The species conservation equation over the height of the soot cake, soot depth layer and wall is
(151)
where wg,k represents the gas mass fraction of species k. The first term on the right side
considers changes in the species composition due to all reactions involved. The second term on
the right side (chain rule) is the spatial derivative of the gas density at constant species fractions.
page [53]
page [54]
Eq.150
and Eq.151
represent an initial value problem that can be integrated from
the top of the soot cake down to the bottom of the filter wall. The initial conditions at the topmost
layer are given by
(152)
(153)
assuming that the species gas composition does not change significantly over the length of the
inlet channel.
In low mass flow bare trap or fuel additive regeneration cases, where the assumption of a
constant O2 concentration along the inlet channel is not valid due to O2 diffusion into the soot
layer, a 1D isothermal steady-state model is applied for the inlet channel gas flow. Sinks for this
model are the convective mass flow through the wall and a diffusive oxygen mass flow into the
soot layer. The oxygen diffusion term, there, is proportional to an artificial diffusion coefficient and
a concentration gradient which comes from the local oxygen concentration in the inlet channel
and the corresponding concentration at the bottom of the soot layer, a result from the Local Layer
model described above. This model approach represents an initial value problem that can be
integrated over the particulate filter length giving an oxygen profile along the inlet channel as well
as diffusive oxygen fluxes into local soot slices given by the axial discretization. These results are
used as an input for the Local Layer regeneration model described above.
page [53]
page [54]
The solution of the 1D fixed-bed model (Eq.150
to Eq.154
) delivers overall soot
reaction source terms for both the cake and the depth layer. Therefore the model is integrated
(154)
(155)
over the individual heights of the two layers. The sources Rsc and Rsd are applied in the transient
page [53]
page [53]
balance equations of two soot layers, Eq.147
and Eq.149
.
54
3. Theory
3.2.4.2.2. CSF Reactions in the PF Inlet and Outlet Channels
While passing through the inlet and outlet channels, the exhaust gas comes into contact with
the catalytic surface of the filter wall. As an example in particulate filters (PF), which are (zone)
coated in the rear part, the unconverted gas which passes the filter wall in the front part comes
into contact with the catalytic surface in the outlet channel rear part and reacts there.
To describe the species conversion in the inlet and outlet channel, 1D isothermal steady-state
models are applied. The discretization is given by the PF monolith discretization in axial direction.
Below the conservation equation for the outlet channel is derived as representative example.
The same applies to the inlet channel with one exception - the sign of the wall flow term, which is
leaving the inlet channel.
Figure 22. 1D Slice of the Outlet channel
where j,g,2 is the density of the gas phase species j in the outlet channel and vg,2 is the gas
velocity. z is the spatial coordinate in axial direction. AF,2 represents the free channel cross
section that is available for the gas flow and PS,n is the wet perimeter of the free channel cross
section of the outlet channel. j,g,w is the density of the gas phase species j at the bottom of the
filter wall entering the outlet channel and vw,2 represents the corresponding wall velocity lateral to
the axial direction. Mj is the molar mass of the species j and S notes the total number of species.
The stoichiometric coefficient of the species j in the reaction i is given by i,j that multiplies the
molar reaction rate r i (cj,g,L,Ts) of the ith reaction.
Beside the temperature, the reaction rates depend on the species concentrations cj,g,L on the
surface of the outlet channel filter wall. The total number of reactions is represented by R.
Due to the chemical reactions occurring on the surface of the catalytic filter wall and due to the
gas flow coming from the inlet channel passing through the filter wall, the concentrations cj,g,L of
the species directly above the catalytic outlet channel surface are not equal to the concentration
of species in the outlet channel bulk.
This effect is accounted for by solving additional balance equations for the individual species
concentrations at the outlet channel surface, taking into account the mass transfer limitation.
Under the assumption of quasi steady-state conditions and neglecting the gas flow through the
filter wall in a first step, the rates of the catalytic surface reactions balance the diffusive transport
from the bulk gas to the surface. Thus, the molar surface concentration (cj,g,L of the component j
can be evaluated using
(157)
where cj,g,2 is the molar concentration of species j in the bulk gas, and kj,m,corr is a mass transfer
coefficient of the individual species.
55
3. Theory
The impact of the gas flow passing through the filter wall on the species surface concentrations
cj,g,L is considered in the calculation of the mass transfer coefficients kj,m,corr. These coefficients
are evaluated with a Sherwood correlation and then corrected with a wall flow term
(158)
The equations above represent an initial value problem that can be integrated from the beginning
of the outlet channel to the end. The initial conditions at the first layer are given by
(159)
This source term comprises the impact of reactions taking place within all different reaction layers
(cake, depth, wall, outlet channel). The source term of the gas phase continuity equation is the
sum of all species sources. It is given by
(161)
page [54]
where this equation comprises the sum of the two soot sources from the depth (Eq.154
)
page [54]
and cake (Eq.155
) filtration layer as well as the sources from stored surface species. The
enthalpy source term results to
(162)
The interaction between flow and soot particles due to migration forces causes the particles,
in particular those in the vicinity of the surface of the soot layer, to be transported along the
56
3. Theory
channel. This leads to a redistribution of already deposited soot. Assuming the soot redistribution
depends on the local soot height and the given inlet channel velocity, the impact of migration can
be expressed by
(163)
where cm is a general migration constant. The soot migration model does not apply on ash. The
model is solved at each integration step after the solution of the PF flow (Section Filter Flow
page [48]
Model
) and solution of the soot deposition and regeneration (Section Deposition and
page [52]
Regeneration of Soot and Ash
) model.
The exhaust gas is distributed in the inlet and outlet channels depending on the pressure
resistance along the flow path. At the inlet of both filter channels the total pressures are the
same. The pressure decreases along the length of the non filtering outlet channel to ambient at
its exit.
The flow model equations to describe the pressure drop and filtering behaviour of the partial
page [48]
page [50]
wall flow filter are the same as for the full wall flow filter (Eq.123
to Eq.133
). The
boundary conditions are derived from the above mentioned assumption, that the total pressure at
both filter inlet channels is the same:
(164)
(165)
(166)
The solution of the model equations leads to the spatial distribution of the velocities, pressures in
the inlet and outlet channels (vg,1(z), vg,2(z), p g,1(z), pg,2(z)), and of the wall velocity vw(z).
The pressure drop over the entire filter is given by the difference of the static pressure directly
in front of the filter and the outlet channel pressure at the end of the effective filter length. This
pressure drop can be further split into its individual contributions (see Overall Pressure Drop and
page [51]
Pressure Drop Contributions
).
57
3. Theory
Figure 25. Modeling SIC PF Glueing Zones in FIRE
The basic model locates the glueing zones via face selections and works out a reduction of the
heat conduction fluxes in the solid energy equation. The idea is to take into account the thermal
resistance due to the presence of the cement. However, this approach does not model the
thermal inertia of the glueing zones, which gives rise to strong temperature gradients on these
locations.
The advanced glueing zones model (called Glueing zones in the solver GUI) allows a full
thermal, dynamical and chemical modeling of these regions. The cement is first included into
the mesh (as shown in the following figure) and the calculation of the solid energy is extended
there. However, the fluid dynamics and the chemistry are not. For the gas, the boundaries of the
glueing zones behave like walls. It is a conjugate heat transfer approach.
Furthermore, it is possible to take into account the reduced number of active filtration walls in
channels directly adjacent to the cement. Either two or three active filtration walls are counted if
page [41]
the channels are located along the cement or in the corner (Fig. 13
). The consequence
is that during a soot loading phase, the soot mass stored into these channels is lower than in
channels having four active walls. The chemical kinetics is also affected during the regeneration
phase, as less active area is available.
This model however is theoretically consistent only when the mesh size of the cells adjacent to
the glueing zones is in the range of one inlet channel size.
Figure 26. Modeling SiC PF Glueing Zones in FIRE - Mesh Detail
3. Theory
to the ambient, flow distribution, soot distribution ...) this model is coupled to FIRE. As sketched
in the following figure, one row of cells (structured mesh) of the CFD mesh represents a portion
of the filter. All inlet/outlet channels inside this row are assumed to have equal properties (soot
loading, temperature, pressure, ...). Typically, one row of cells stands for 5 inlet/outlet channels
(depending on the cell size).
The applied numerical concept is an implicit/explicit coupling of the PF sub-models and 3D-CFD
code FIRE and the 1D-code BOOST, respectively. By using this procedure the computational
effort is reduced dramatically. The pressure drop, obtained from the solution of the 1D filter flow
model for each row of cells (see below), is taken as a (stepwise constant) source term for the
three-dimensional flow equations. Hence, the CFD solution is de-coupled from the local effects
of deposition, regeneration or pressure drop in the filter and thus, improves the robustness of the
solution process significantly. In BOOST, the results of the stepwise calculated PF sub-models
are transferred to its catalytic converter model (see Section BOOST Balance Equations, Single
page [13]
Channel Model
) where all the required balance equations are solved.
Figure 27. Integration Concept of the PF Submodel in the FIRE/BOOST Solver
From the basic solution concept sketched, a detailed simulation procedure can be derived as
summarized in the following table.
Table 4-2: Integrate PF Flow and Regeneration Solutions in BOOST/FIRE
I) Solve 1D PF Flow Model for Each Row of Cells
Input
Output
soot distribution
Output
Output
59
3. Theory
actual inlet channel velocity distribution
3.2.9. Nomenclature
Latin Letters
Units
60
AF,1
(m )
AF,2
(m )
Afront
(m )
AGSE
(m )
Ainl
(m )
Aout
(m )
Aunity
(m )
(m)
(m)
cdr
(-)
cm
Migration constant
(-)
CPSIinl
(in )
CPSIout
(in )
CPSI
(in )
CPSMinl
(m )
CPSMout
(m )
CPSM
(m )
d1
(m)
d2
(m)
dprimary
(m)
F1
(-)
2
2
2
2
2
2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
3. Theory
F2
(-)
Feff,1
Filtration efficiency of l1
(-)
Feff,2
Filtration efficiency of l2
(-)
GSAinl
(m /m )
GSAout
(m /m )
GSA
(m /m )
Kn
Knudsen number
(-)
ksc
(m )
ksd
(m )
kw
(m )
l1
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
lash-plug
(m)
leff
(m)
lplug
(m)
lpd
(-)
mac
(kg/m )
mac,layer
(kg/m )
mac,plug
(kg/m )
msc
(kg/m )
msd
(kg/m )
msoot,inl
(kg/m )
Molar Mass
(kg/kmol)
n1
(-)
nC
(-)
OFAinl
(m /m )
OFAout
(m /m )
OFA
(m /m )
Pinl
(m)
Pout
(m)
PS,1
(m)
l2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
61
3. Theory
PS,2
(m)
pg,1
(Pa)
pg,2
(Pa)
pout
(Pa)
(Pa)
pac
62
(Pa)
(Pa)
peff
(Pa)
pinl
(Pa)
pout
(Pa)
pplug,inl
(Pa)
pplug,out
(Pa)
psc
(Pa)
psd
(Pa)
pw
(Pa)
(-)
Rsc
(kg/(m s))
Rsd
(kg/(m s))
Rcontinuity
(kg/(m s))
Renthalpy
(J/(m s))
Rspecies,j
(kg/(m s))
(-)
(kmol/(m s))
SCF
Stokes-Cunningham factor
(-)
Ssc
(-)
Ssd
(-)
(m)
Time
(s)
Ts
Solid temperature
(K)
VPF
Filter volume
(m )
vg,1
(m/s)
vg,2
(m/s)
vinl
(m/s)
vout
(m/s)
vw
Wall velocity
(m/s)
3
3
3
3. Theory
vw,dl
(-)
vw,1
(m/s)
vw,2
(m/s)
(m)
wg,j
(kg/kg)
wg,j,inl
(kg/kg)
(m)
yg
Mole fraction
(mol/mol)
(m)
Greek Letters
Total thickness of the filter wall and washcoat
(m)
ac
(m)
sc
(m)
sd
(m)
(m)
wc
(m)
(-)
(-)
(m)
Viscosity
(Pas)
Stoichiometry coefficient
(-)
ac
(kg/m )
Gas density
(kg/m )
g,1
(kg/m )
g,2
(kg/m )
inl
(kg/m )
out
(kg/m )
sc
(kg/m )
sd
(kg/m )
in
(-)
out
(-)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
63
3. Theory
page [240]
Overview
Pipes are a major component of aftertreatment systems, connecting aftertreatment devices
such as catalytic converters or particulate filters. Assuming that radial effects within the gas
phase of pipes are of minor importance, a transient 1D model is sufficient to describe its entire
thermo- and fluid dynamics covering the effects of convection in axial direction and heat transfer
in perpendicular (radial) direction to the solid wall. Axial gas phase conduction is assumed to
be negligible due to the high flow velocities typical of engine exhaust systems. In a very generic
consideration, the wall of a pipe consists of opaque layers such as steel walls or insulation mats
and of transparent layers representing air gaps.
The following figure sketches such a pipe consisting of three wall layers, an insulation mat and
an air gap. Although this configuration may not represent real-life pipes, it will point out the
capabilities of the generic model offered by BOOST. The main effects taking place within the pipe
wall are heat transfer from the exhaust gas, heat conduction in axial and radial direction, heat
radiation between the surfaces neighboring transparent layers and heat transfer to the ambient
due to convection and radiation.
Figure 29. Main Transport Effects in a Pipe Consisting of Different Wall Layers
In the following section the basic equations of a transient 1D compressible pipe flow model
with variable cross sections are presented, followed by the balance equations of a solid wall
consisting of an arbitrary number of different wall layers. In the absence of chemical reactions,
the solution of species transport equations may look redundant. These equations are kept in the
model to provide a correct transient species transport between reacting components that are
linked by a pipe.
where
is the density of the gas phase, is the time,
is the gas velocity, and is the spatial
coordinate in axial direction.
represents the hydraulic gas cross section in the pipe. This term
is part of the spatial derivative in order to consider variable cross sections as given in conical
pipe sections.
page [96]
The pressure drop in the channel is described by Darcy's law (see Kaviany [26
])
(168)
64
3. Theory
where
by
where
is the hydraulic channel diameter and is called Fanning friction factor which
takes into account deviations from round channel cross sections (e.g. round=1, square=0.89,
Equilateral Triangle=0.83). is a generic friction coefficient. This coefficient is given by
(170)
and turbulent
flow regimes. and are laminar and turbulent
friction coefficients, respectively. If the turbulent friction characteristics are described by a relative
surface roughness the turbulent friction coefficient is calculated from the Colebrook equation.
page [96]
This equation (see Liu et al. [48
]) is given by
(171)
where
represents the relative surface roughness of the pipe wall.
The species conservation equation is given by
(172)
where
represents the gas mass fraction of species .
The energy balance of the gas phase is
(173)
where
is the total enthalpy of a component . It is summed up over all species using their
individual mass fractions
as weighting factor in order to express the overall gas phase
enthalpy.
is the heat transfer coefficient between the gas phase and the solid wall.
and
represent the gas temperature and the wall temperature at the inner side of the innermost
wall layer.
is the geometrical surface area of the pipe wall inner side.
65
3. Theory
where
is the temperature of the catalyst wall. and represent the radial and axial
coordinates, respectively. Wall density
, wall heat capacity
and its thermal conductivity
are given within the time and space derivatives in order to consider their temperature
dependence. All three properties are marked with the index to distinguish between the
page [64]
properties of different wall layers as sketched in Fig. 29
.
The boundary conditions of the 2D heat conduction field are given by
(175)
(176)
(177)
(178)
where
and
represent the heat transfer coefficients between gas and wall and between
wall and ambient, respectively. The first is evaluated using a Nusselt correlation, the latter is
used as model input parameter in a simplifying approach.
is the ambient temperature and
is the radiation sink temperature which is not necessarily equal to the ambient temperature.
represents the emissivity of the outer surface of the outermost wall layer and is the Stefanpage [66]
page [66]
Boltzmann constant. According to Eq.175
and Eq.176
no heat losses in axial
page [66]
direction are assumed. At the wall inner side (Eq.177
) a boundary heat flux is given by
convective heat transfer between the gas and the wall. At the outer surface of the pipe wall
page [66]
(Eq.178
), convective and radiative heat transfer to the ambient are taken into account.
3.3.2.1. Air-Gaps
If i.e. air-gaps are part of the model, it is additionally necessary to consider radiative heat transfer
between the opaque walls neighboring a transparent layer. This radiative heat exchange, taken
page [97]
from VDI [64
], is evaluated according to
(179)
page [64]
where
and represent (see Fig. 29
) the emissivities at the outer surface
, of the
inner layer and at the inner surface of the outer layer, respectively.
is the viewing factor
from the outer (inner) side of the inner (outer) layer to the inner (outer) side of the inner (outer)
page [97]
layer. Both viewing factors are evaluated according to VDI [64
] assuming finite length
coaxial cylinders.
The conductive/radiative heat transfer within air-gaps is typically augmented by free convection.
page [97]
Therefore, an effective heat conductivity taken from Wilde [74
] is applied in the model. It is
given by
(180)
3. Theory
Where
is the heat transfer coefficient for heat exchange between the gas phase and
the solid wall. dhyd is the hydraulic diameter of the pipe inner side and
represents the heat
conductivity of the gas phase.
page [96]
Based on Lienhard and Lienhard [47
] BOOST offers the following approaches for the
definition of the Nusselt number:
Re-Analogy:
(183)
Colburn:
(184)
Pethukov:
(185)
Gnielinski:
(186)
page
(188)
where
67
3. Theory
3.3.2.4. Wall-Ambient Heat-Transfer
page
The external heat transfer model applies Nusselt approaches for cross-flow take from VDI [64
[97]
]. The correlation considers free and forced convection. It is given by:
(189)
page [97]
3.3.3. Nomenclature
Units
68
ageo
(m /m )
Ag
(m )
Ai
(m )
Ao
(m )
cp
(J/(kgK))
cp,l,w
(J/(kgK))
dhyd
Hydraulic diameter
(m)
(-)
FP
(-)
FB
(-)
KD
(kg/(m s))
Gravimetric acceleration
(m/s )
(-)
hg
(kJ/kmol)
hk,g
(kJ/kmol)
LPipe
Pipe length
(m)
Nu
Nusselt Number
(-)
2
2
2
(-)
Nufree
(-)
pg
Pressure
(Pa)
Pr
Prandtl number
(-)
Prair
(-)
(W)
(m)
rgw
(m)
rwa
(m)
3. Theory
Rel
(-)
Ret
(-)
Re
Reynolds number
(-)
Sh
Sherwood number
(-)
Time
(s)
Tamb
Ambient Temperature
(K)
Tg
Gas temperature
(K)
Trad
(K)
Tw
Wall temperature
(K)
Tw,i
(K)
Tw,o
(K)
vg
(m/s)
wk,g
(kg/kg)
(m)
Greek Letters
2
gw
(W/m )
wa
(W/m )
air
(1/K)
(m)
Pipe roughness
(m)
(-)
(-)
(-)
Friction factor
(-)
(-)
(-)
(-)
io
(-)
io
(-)
air
(W/(mK))
eff
(W/(mK))
69
3. Theory
g
(W/(mK))
l,w
(W/(mK))
(W/m /K )
(kg/m )
l,w
(kg/m )
air
(m /s)
(m /s)
3
3
2
2
3. Theory
Injection of a liquid fluid requires a mapping to be specified onto which gas species a certain
liquid gets split. This mapping process represents conversion reactions or thermal break-up
taking place in the gas phase. In these cases the specified heat of evaporation should include
also heat needed for these reactions.
The mapping can also cover consumption of a gas species, e.g. UREA breaks up into NH3 and
CO2 consuming H2O:
(190)
Consuming a certain species requires its availability. If wallfilm modeling is disabled, the injection
mass flux gets reduced by that amount which cannot evaporate due to missing consumed
species; otherwise, this amount is directly stored in the wallfilm.
Additionally, a portion of the liquid may be chosedn to be transported downstream as droplets.
The wallfilm exchanges heat with the gas phase and the solid wall:
(192)
The thermal break-up of urea is starting at its melting point of 406 K. Its wallfilm evaporation rate
page [95]
is calculated according to the following Arrhenius law (see [8
]):
(195)
71
3. Theory
page [95]
]):
(197)
Urea particles are assumed to exchange heat mainly with the gas phase because of their
page
spherical shape. This is described by the following expression (as discussed in principle in [8
[95]
]):
(198)
3.4.4. Nomenclature
Units
AF
(m )
(-)
(kg/m )
(J/(kgK))
dF
Wallfilm thickness
(m)
DF
Wallfilm diameter
(m)
dhyd
Hydraulic diameter
(m)
dSL1
(m)
Durea
(m)
(J/mol)
(m/s)
gas phase
(W/K)
solid wall
(W/K)
cp,film
kfilm,gas
72
gas phase
(W/K)
(kg/(ms))
Nurea
(-)
(kg/s)
(kg/s)
(kg/s)
3. Theory
Injected mass stored in wallfilm due to missing consumed
species
(kg/s)
Pr
Prandtl number
(-)
(J/(molK))
Re
Reynolds number
(-)
Tfilm
Wallfilm temperature
(K)
Tg
Gas temperature
(K)
Tinj
Injection temperature
(K)
Tsolid
(K)
VF
Wallfilm volume
(m )
in wallfilm
(-)
(-)
Greek Letters
film
(W/(mK))
(W/(mK))
solid
(W/(mK))
film
Density of wallfilm
(kg/m )
(kg/m )
3
3
page [246]
Physical Model
For the purpose of measuring gas temperatures a great variety of temperature sensors is
available that ranges over a broad band of technical working principles. However, in order
to derive a general physical model for a temperature sensor or thermocouple some basic
characteristics common to all of them may be assessed.
page [73]
In figure Fig. 31
the schematic of a thermocouple is shown:
Figure 31. Thermocouple
The base physical phenomena which have to be considered when modeling a thermocouple
device are:
73
3. Theory
1. convective heat transfer between the gas phase and the thermocouple,
2. heat conduction within the solid substrate of the thermocouple,
3. heat radiation between the solid surface of the thermocouple and the inner solid surface of
the device into which the thermocouple is placed.
These phenomena translate into the following transient balance equation for the temperature
TTHC of the thermocouple:
(199)
The temperature sensor model is a 1D model with the discretization axis being the thermocouple
axis.
For flow in pipes the velocity and temperature profile is assumed to be of parabola shape:
Due to friction the gas flow has zero velocity at the wall and its maximum in a pipe's center.
As a consequence the convective heat transfer coefficient
is spatially dependent.
Additionally one can generally assume a temperature gradient between pipe wall and the
gas flow in the pipe center. The heat transfer between gas flow and pipe wall leads to a
radial gradient in the temperature field, that again results in spatially dependent heat transfer
between gas and thermocouple.
The assumed shape of velocity and temperature field is shown in the below figure:
Figure 32. Velocity and temperature profile in a pipe.
On the other hand, when looking at a converter the flow (velocity as well as gas temperature)
within the channels can be assumed to be constant across the cross-section.
page [74]
The balance equation Eq.199
is solved in BOOST by linear discretization with respect
to the spatial dimension x and with respect to time. After each time step the balance equation is
solved providing the current thermocouple temperature.
During the solution for the thermocouple temperature the gas temperature is assumed to remain
constant. The physical properties of the thermocouple are in general temperature dependent and
therefore dependent on the spatial position x.
The time step is split into sub time steps determined by the sampling rate with which the
thermocouple signal is sampled by the measurement equipment.
The top of the thermocouple located in the gas flow is assumed to be adiabatic, whereas at the
end of the thermocouple heat is ideally conducted between thermocouple and wall.
The thermocouple is assumed not to change the amount of heat in the gas phase nor in the wall,
and also its influence on the gas velocity and pressure drop is neglected.
3.5.1. Nomenclature
Units
74
cp
J/(kg.K)
rPipe
Pipe radius
Tg
Gas temperature
3. Theory
TTHC
Thermocouple temperature
TW
Wall temperature
Thermocouple volume
vg
Gas velocity
m/s
Greek Letters
2
W/(m .K)
W/(m.K)
kg/m
Stefan-Boltzmann constant
W/(m .K )
3
2
page [187]
, Particulate Filter
page [224]
, Aftertreatment Pipe
page [240]
Overview
Adjacent aftertreatment elements can be coupled thermally to each other by enabling the switch
Couple to Upstream Element. A coupled pair of elements may consist of any combination of
Pipe, Catalyst and Particulate Filter (PF). For all of these elements, heat conduction occurs via
the walls of the elements.
Thermal Coupling of Walls
For the heat conduction between the walls of the elements to have an effect, at least one of the
page [193]
coupled elements must have its Variable Wall Temperature
model enabled. If one of
75
3. Theory
page [191]
page [191]
Each element has its variable wall temperature model activated. When the elements are not
thermally coupled, the temperature profile shows discontinuities at the boundaries between the
catalyst and the attached pipes. With thermal coupling enabled, however, the temperature profile
is smooth. The substrate's temperature is slightly lower in the coupled case because of the heat
flow toward the pipes.
When coupling elements which both have the variable wall temperature model enabled, but with
a different number of wall layers, the mean temperature over all non-air wall layers is used for
calculating the heat flux. This is illustrated in the following figure.
Figure 34. Thermal Coupling of Multilayer Walls
Layers 1 and 3 of Pipe 1 at axial position 1.0 have the same temperature as layer 1 of Pipe 2 at axial position
Thermal Coupling of Substrates
When two elements possessing a monolith (Catalyst, PF) are coupled (i.e. when Couple to
Upstream Element is active), heat conduction may additionally occur between the substrates
page [76]
(Fig. 35
a). The thermal coupling of the elements' monoliths can be suppressed by
enabling the switch Consider Air Gap between Elements. In this case only heat conduction
page [76]
over the elements' shells (walls) occurs (Fig. 35
b).
Figure 35. Thermal coupling of walls and substrates.
76
3. Theory
(201)
where
(202)
77
3. Theory
(203)
(207)
(208)
3. Theory
R7
R8
R9
Cerium Storage Reactions:
R10
R11
R12
R13
Rhodium Storage Reactions:
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
Barium Storage Reactions:
R20
R21
Hydrocarbon (HC) Storage Reaction:
R22
The corresponding reaction rates are defined as follows:
(209)
(210)
(211)
(212)
(213)
(214)
79
3. Theory
(215)
(216)
(217)
(218)
(219)
(220)
(221)
(222)
(223)
(224)
(225)
(226)
(227)
(228)
where
(229)
(230)
(231)
80
3. Theory
(233)
(234)
approach 2:
where:
(235)
(236)
(237)
where
81
3. Theory
comprises seven reactions based on publications presented in the literature [75
[98]
].
page [97]
, 78
page
Kinetic Model
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7, approach 1
R7, approach 2
The corresponding reaction rates for the reactions 1-6 are defined as follows:
(240)
(241)
(242)
(243)
(244)
(245)
where:
(246)
approach 2:
where:
(247)
82
3. Theory
(248)
(249)
83
3. Theory
(252)
(253)
(254)
(255)
(256)
(257)
where:
(258)
approach 2:
where:
(259)
(260)
(261)
3. Theory
AVL User Coding Interface
Overview
This pre-defined reaction model describes a Lean NOx Trap catalyst considering catalytic
reactions, O2 surface storage reactions and NOx storage reactions. The last reaction set can
be chosen as either an ash core model approach or as surface storage reactions. BOOST/FIRE
take into account the following 16 reactions:
Kinetic Model
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
For all reaction rates the following definition applies:
(262)
The corresponding reaction rates for the catalytic reactions 1-10 are defined as follows:
(263)
(264)
(265)
85
3. Theory
(266)
(267)
(268)
(269)
(270)
(271)
(272)
Storage and release of O2 is described by reaction 11 and depends on the surface oxygen ratio:
(273)
(274)
where the engine lambda eng is evaluated from the species composition in the bulk gas
page [95]
according to Brinkmeier [10
] is described by the equation
(275)
A fuel CHx with ratio of x=1.814 is assumed and the mole fraction of oxygen in air yO2,air is
assumed to be 0.2095.
3.8.5.1. Nitric Oxides Storage Approach
Two approaches are available for the reactions 12 to 16 describing the NOx storage and release
of barium carbonate.
86
3. Theory
3.8.5.1.1. First approach - Ash Core Model
The first approach follows the ash-core model approach developed by ICVT Stuttgart (see also
page [97]
page [95]
[63
] and [20
], where NOx is stored as barium nitrate Ba(NO3)2 forming a so called
ash growing into barium carbonate BaCO3 clusters. The corresponding reaction rates are:
(276)
(277)
(278)
(279)
(280)
Here
=r/RBa,p is the relative ash core front position in the barium cluster particle (as shown
where p,min and p,max are the minimum and the maximum values of the particle surface area
per catalyst unit volume, and Ba,p is the ratio between p,max and p,min. The same approach is
applied for the catalytic surface area of the NOx storage and regeneration, geo,F , which is
(282)
trans
is the geometrical surface area of the catalyst. One can show that there is the following
The specific storage volume of the barium cluster particle is evaluated by the integration over the
particle radius RBa,p, as described by
(284)
(kmol/m ) is the storage capacity of the barium carbonate surface site. Furthermore,
must fulfill the following relation, described by
(286)
Ba,p
87
3. Theory
3
where cBa,p (mol/m ) is the molar density of the barium cluster particle. By combining equations
page [87]
page [87]
page [87]
(Eq.284
), (Eq.285
), and (Eq.286
) cBa,p is determined by
(287)
Figure 36. Growing of Barium Nitrate Ash Core Front into Barium Carbonate Cluster during NOx Stora
Depending on the excess oxygen ratio EOR, the model distinguishes between NOx storage
and NOx regeneration, where NOx storage may occur after full or after incomplete regeneration
depending on the front position of the previous storage .
The excess oxygen ratio is the amount of molecular oxygen in the gas divided by the amount
of required oxygen for full combustion of carbon and hydrogen minus the provided oxygen in
nitric-oxides and other oxygen compounds. It is calculated with the bulk gas composition by the
equation
(288)
z is the number of oxygen in the molecule AOz where A is an arbitrary element. In the molecule
CxHy, x and y are the number of carbon and hydrogen atoms, respectively. For EOR>1 NOx
storage and for EOR<1 regeneration occurs.
The front position
depends on the state of the NOx regeneration. If the previous regeneration
was complete, or the actual front position is deeper than the front position of the previous
regeneration (
), it is determined by the equation
(289)
If the actual front position is not as deep as front position of the previous regeneration
(
), it is determined by the equation
(290)
The storage and regeneration reactions take place on the ash core front in the barium cluster
particle. Diffusive transport of the products and educts between the ash core front and catalytic
surface layer takes place. For every species of the gas phase an additional ordinary differential
front
equation has to be solved to determine the species mole fraction on the ash core front yk
, as
described by the equation
(291)
88
3. Theory
-4
is the volume fraction of the barium cluster particle which is assumed to be 10 , DBa.p is the
pore diffusion coefficient, i,k is the stoichiometric coefficient of species k in reaction i, and
is the reaction rate of reaction i. Quasi-steady conditions are assumed to determine the
L
species mole fraction in the catalytic surface layer yk .
Ba,p
where:
(298)
(299)
89
3. Theory
(300)
(301)
(302)
(303)
(304)
(306)
90
3. Theory
FIRE/BOOST additionally offers to define this regeneration mechanism for two different layers
of soot. Therefore a sub-layer can be specified and different kinetic parameters can be applied
there.
This set of four reactions can be defined in two different soot layer zones with different reaction
parameters. With the specification of a sub-layer height, catalytically supported reactions near
the filter wall can be modeled.
91
3. Theory
Kinetic Model
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
In addition to the four reactions summarized in Section Filter Regeneration with Oxygen and
page [91]
Nitric Dioxide
, the reversible oxidation of nitric monoxide to nitric dioxide is considered.
The rates of the first three reactions are described in Section Filter Regeneration with Oxygen
page [91]
and Nitric Dioxide
and the rate of the fourth reaction is given in Section DOC Catalyst
page [77]
Reactions
.
(310)
(311)
92
3. Theory
where
(312)
(313)
(314)
where
(315)
(316)
3.8.11. Nomenclature
Units
2
ageo,F
(m /m )
ap,max
(m /m )
ap,min
(m /m )
areac
(m /m )
atrans
(m /m )
ck
(kmol/m )
ck
(kmol/m )
cBa,p
(kmol/m )
(variable)
DBa,p
(m /s)
fCO
(-)
(variable)
(variable)
Keq
Equilibrium constant
(variable)
Nk
(kmol/m )
Pressure
(Pa)
Radial coordinate
(m)
(kmol/(m s))
(kJ/(kmolK))
3
3
3
93
3. Theory
RBa,p
(m)
TA
(K)
Temperature
(K)
VBa,p
yk
yk
yk
front
(kmol/kmol)
(-)
(-)
Zk
Zk
front
(kmol/kmol)
Greek Letters
Ratio of maximum and minimum specific particle surface
area (LNT model)
(-)
(-)
(m /m )
(-)
(-)
Stoichiometric coefficient
(-)
(-)
st
Ba,p
Ba,p
Site density
(kmol/m )
Indices
94
atm
Atmospheric
Ba,p
eng
Engine
EOR
equ
Equilibrium
Reaction index
3. Theory
k
Species index
solid
Solid
3.9. Literature
1. Ahn T., Pinczewski V. and Trimm D.L., 'Transient Performance of Catalytic Combustors for
Gas Turbine Applications.' Chemical Engineering Science 41, 1986, 55-64.
2. Baehr H. D., Stephan K., 'Waerme- und Stoffuebertragung', Springer, Berlin Heidelberg,
New York, 1994.
3. Bardon S., Bouteiller B., Bonnail N., Girot P., Gleize V., Oxarango L., Higelin P., Michelin
J., Schuerholz S. and Terres F. "Asymmetric Channels to Increase DPF Lifetime", SAE
2004-01-0950, 2004.
4. Barin I. 'Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances'. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc,
New York, London, Sidney, 1985.
5. Becker C., Reinsch B., Strobel M., Frisse H. P. and Fritsch A. 'Particulate Filter Made of
Cordierite - Design and Regeneration Management', MTZ 2008-06, Vol. 69, pp. 20-26, 2008.
th
6. Bird R. B., Stewart W. E. Lightfoot E. N. 'Transport Phenomena', 6 Edition, John
Wiley&Sons Inc., New York, London, Sydney, 1965.
7. Birkhold F., Meingast U., Wassermann P., Deutschmann, O. 'Analysis of the Injection of
Urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-Systems: Modeling of Two-phase Flow and
Spray/Wall-Interaction'. SAE 2006-01-0643, 2006.
8. Birkhold F., Meingast U., Wassermann P., Deutschmann, O. 'Modeling and simulation of
the injection of urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-systems'. Appl. Catal. B:
Environ. 70, pp. 119-127, 2007.
9. Bissett E. J. 'Mathematical model of the thermal regeneration of a wall-flow monolith diesel
particulate filter'. Chem. Eng. Sci. , 39:1233-1244, 1984.
10. Brinkmeier C. 'Automotive Three-Way Exhaust Aftertreatment under Transient Conditions Measurements, Modeling and Simulation', 2006, PhD-Thesis, University of Stuttgart.
11. Chen D.K.S. and Cole C.E. 'Numerical Simulation and Experimental Verification of
Conversion and Thermal Responses for a Pt/Rh Metal Monolithic Converter'. SAE 890798,
1989.
12. Coltrin M.E., Kee R.J., Rupley F.M. and Meeks E. 'Surface Chemkin III: A Fortran Package
for Analyzing Heterogeneous Chemical Kinetics at a Solid Surface - Gas Phase Interface'.
Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND96-8217 Unlimited Release, 1996.
13. DieselNet Technology Guide 'Ceramic Monolith Substrates', May 2001, URL http://
www.dieselnet.com.
14. Froment G. F. and Bischoff K. B. 'Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design', John Wiley&Sons
Inc., New York, London, Sydney, 1990.
15. Fuller E.N., Schettler P.D. and Giddings J.C. 'A new method for the prediction of gas phase
diffusion coefficients'. Ind. Eng. Chem. 58:19-27, 1966.
16. Gaiser G. and Mucha P. 'Prediction of Pressure Drop in Diesel Particulate Filters
Considering Ash Deposit and Partial Regeneration', SAE 2004-01-0158, 2004.
17. Gordon, S. and McBride, B.J. 'Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical
Equilibrium Compositions, Rocket Performance, Incident and Reflected Shocks and
Chapman-Jouguet Detonations'. NASA SP-273, 1971.
18. Guo Z. and Zhang Z. 'Multi-Dimensional Modeling and Simulation of Wall-Flow Diesel
Particulate Filter During Loading and Regeneration', SAE 2006-01-0265, 2006.
19. Haralampous O. A., Dardiotis C. K., Koltsakis G. C. and Samaras Z. C. 'Study of Catalytic
Regeneration Mechanisms in Diesel Particulate Filters Using Coupled Reaction Diffusion
Modeling', SAE 2004-01-1941, 2004.
20. Hauff C. H. 'Implementierung des Modells eines NOx-Speicherkatalysators in das
Simulationstool BOOST', Master thesis at ICVT, Stuttgart University, 2007.
21. Hayes, R.E. and Kolackowski, S. 'Introduction to Catalytic Combustion'. Gordon and Breach
Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1997.
22. Herzog P.L., Strigl T., Diewald R., and Wanker R. 'Particlulate filter - a key technology for
HSDI diesels: From simulation to series application'. JSAE 20025356, 2002.
23. Hughes K. W. and Floerchinger P., 'Ultra Thinwall Light-off Performance - Varying
Substrates, Catalysts, and Flow Rates; Models and Engine Testing', SAE 2002-1-352.
95
3. Theory
24. Huynh J. H., Cuong T. and Johnson, Yang S.T., Song L. and Bagley and Warner J.R.
'A one-dimensional computational model for studying the filtration and regeneration
characteristics of a catalyzed wall-flow diesel particulate filter', SAE 2003-01-0841, 2003.
25. Johnson T. V. 'Diesel Emission Control in Review', SAE 2000-01-0184, 2000.
26. Kaviani M. 'Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media', Mechanical Engineering Series,
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1991.
27. Kee R.J., Dixon Lewis, G., Warnatz J., Coltrin M.E. and Miller J.A. 'A Fortran Computer
Package for the Evaluation of Gas Phase Multicomponent Transport Properties'. Sandia
National Laboratories Report, SAND86-8246, 1986.
28. Kee R.J., Rupley F.M. and Miller J.A. 'The Chemkin Thermodynamic Database'. Sandia
National Laboratories Report, SAND87-8215, 1987.
29. Khinast J., 'Kinetik, Reaktionsmechanismus und Simulation eines trockenen
Rauchgasentschwefelungsverfahren', PhD-thesis, Technical University Graz, 1995.
30. Kirchner T. and Eigenberger G., 'Optimization of the Cold-Start Behaviour of Automotive
Catalysts Using an Electrically Heated Pre-Catalyst', Chemical Engineering Science 51,
1996, 2409-2418.
31. Koltsakis G. C. and Stamatelos A. M. 'Modes of Catalytic Regeneration in Diesel Particulate
Filters', Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(10):4155-4165, 1997.
32. Koltsakis G. C. and Stamatelos, A. M. 'Modeling dynamic phenomena in 3-way catalytic
converters', Chemical Engineering Science 54, 1999, 4567-4578.
33. Koltsakis G. C., Konstantinidis, P.A. and Stamatelos A. M.. 'Development and application
range of mathematical models for 3-way catalysts',Applied Catalysis B. Environmental 12,
1997, 161-191.
34. Koltsakis G.C. and Stamatelos A.M., 'Modes of catalytic regeneration in diesel particle
filters'. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 36:4155-4165, 1997.
35. Konstandopoulos A. G. 'Flow Resistance Descriptors for Diesel Particulate Filters:
Definitions, Measurements and Testing', SAE 2003-01-0846, 2003.
36. Konstandopoulos A. G. and Kostoglou M., 'Periodically reversed flow regeneration of diesel
particulate traps'. SAE 1999-01-0469 , 1999.
37. Konstandopoulos A. G., Kostoglou M. and Housiada P. 'Spatial Non-Uniformities in Diesel
Particulate Trap Regeneration', SAE 2001-01-0908, 2001.
38. Konstandopoulos A. G., Kostoglou M., Skaperdas E., Papioannou E., Zarvalis D., and
Kladopoulou E., 'Fundamental studies of diesel particulate filters: Transient loading,
regeneration and ageing'. SAE 2000-01-1016 , 2000.
39. Konstandopoulos A. G., Kostoglou M., Vlachos N. and Kladopoulou E. 'Progress in Diesel
Particulate Filter Systems', SAE 2005-01-0946, 2005.
40. Konstandopoulos A. G., Skaperdas E. and Masoudi M. 'Interial Contributions to the Pressure
Drop of Diesel Particulate Filters', SAE 2001-01-0909, 2001.
41. Konstandopoulos A. G., Skaperdas E. and Masoudi M. 'Microstructural Properties of Soot
Deposits in Diesel Particulate Traps', SAE 2002-01-1015, 2002.
42. Konstandopoulos A. G., Skaperdas E., Warren J., and Allansson R. 'Optimise filter
design and selection criteria for continuously generating diesel particulate traps'. SAE
1999-01-0468 , 1999.
43. Konstandopoulos A. G., Vlachos N., Housiada P. and Kostoglou M. 'Simulation of
Triangular-Cell-Shaped Fibrous Wall-Flow Filters', SAE 2003-01-0844, 2003.
44. Konstandopoulos A.G. and Kostoglou M., 'Reciprocating flow regeneration of soot filters.
Combustion and Flame', 121:488-500, 2000.
45. Konstandopoulos A.G.and Johnson J.H., 'Wall-flow diesel particulate filter - their pressure
drop and collection efficiency'. SAE 890404 , 1989.
46. Kuhnke D., Spray Wall Interaction Modelling by Dimensionless Data Analysis, PhD thesis,
Technische Universitaet Darmstadt, 2004.
47. Lienhard John H. IV and Lienhard John H. V 'A Heat Transfer Text Book Phlogiston Press,
Cambridge Massachusetts, 3rd edition, 2003.
48. Liu Zheji and Hoffmanner Albert L. 'Exhaust Transient Temperature Response', SAE
950617, 1995.
49. Millet C. N., Menegazzi P., Martin B., Colas H. and Bourgeois C. 'Modeling of Diesel
Particulate Filter, Regeneration: Effect of Fuel-Borne Catalyst', SAE 2002-01-2786, 2002.
50. Missy S., Thams J., Bollig M., Tatschl R., Wanker R., Bachler G., Ennemoser A., and
Grantner H. 'Computer-aided optimisation of the exhaust gas aftertreatment system of the
new BMW 1.8-litre valvetronic engine'. MTZ Journal , 11:18-29, 2001.
96
3. Theory
51. Mohammed H., Triana A. P., Yang S. L. and Johnson J. H. 'An Advanced 1D 2-Layer
Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter Model to Simulate: Filtration by the Wall and Particulate
Cake, Oxidation in the Wall and Particulate Cake by NO2 and O2, and Regeneration by
Heat Addition', SAE 2005-01-0467, 2005.
52. Ogyu K., Ohno K., Hong S. and Komori T. 'Ash Storage Capacity Enhancment of Diesel
Particulate Filter', SAE 2004-01-0949, 2004.
53. Ohno K., Shimato N., Taoka K., Hong S., Ninomiya T., Komori T. and Salvat O.,
'Characterization of SiC-DPF for Passenger Car', SAE 2000-01-0185, 2000.
54. Opris C. N. 'A Computational Model Based on the Flow, Filtration, Heat Transfer and
Reaction Kinetics Theory in a Porous Ceramic Diesel Particulate Trap', PhD thesis, Michigan
Technological University, 1997.
55. O'Rourke, P.J. 'Statistical Properties and Numerical Implementation of a Model for Droplet
Dispersion in Turbulent Gas', J. Comput. Physics 83, 1989.
56. Perry R. and Green D., 'Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook'. New York, McGraw Hill
Book Company, 6. Edition, 1984.
57. Peters B. and Dziugys A., 'Numerical modeling of electrified particle layer formation on the
surface of filtration fabric'. Environmental Engineering , 9:4:191-197, 2001.
58. Peters B. and Dziugys A., 'Numerical simulation of the motion of granular material using
object-oriented techniques'. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , 191:1983-2001, 2002.
59. Peters B. J., Wanker R., Muenzer A. and Wurzenberger J. C. 'Integrated 1D to 3D simulation
Workflow of Exhaust Aftertreament Devices', SAE 2004-01-1132, 2004.
60. Reid R.C., Prausnitz J.M. and Poling B.E. 'The properties of gases and liquids'. 4th Edition,
Mc Graw Hill, New York, 1988.
61. Shah R. K. and London A. L. 'Laminar flow forced convection in ducts: a sourcebook for
compact heat transfer exchange analytical data'. Academic Press, 1978.
62. Taylor R., and Krishna R. 'Multicomponent Mass Transfer', John Wiley&Sons Inc., New
York, London, Sydney, 1993.
63. Tuttlies U., Schmeisser V. and Eigenberger G. 'A mechanistic simulation model for NOx
storage catalyst dynamics', Chemical Engineering Science, 59, 2004, 4731-4738.
64. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (Ed.) VDI-Waermeatlas, Berechnungsblaetter fuer den
th
Warmeuebergang. 7 Edition, VDI Verlag, Duesseldorf, 1994.
65. Voltz E.V., Morgan C.R. and Liederman, D. and Jacob, S.M. 'Kinetic Study of Carbon
Monoxide and Propylene Oxidation on Platinum Catalysts'. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res.
Develop. 12:4, 1973, 294-301.
66. Wakao W., Smith J.M, 'Diffusion in catalyst pellets', Chemical Engineering Science 17
(1962): 825-834, 1962.
67. Wanker R. and Peters B., 'DPF pressure drop vs. soot mass during regeneration and
loading'. Technical report, AVL Internal Communication, 2001.
68. Wanker R., Granter H., Bachler G., Rabenstein G., Ennemoser A., Tatschl R., and Bollig M.
'New physical and chemical models for the CFD simulation of exhaust gas lines: A generic
approach'. SAE 2002-01-0066 , 2002.
69. Wanker R., Granter H., Tatschl R., and Bollig M. '3D CFD simulation of exhaust lines: A new
approach to account for current and future challenges'. JSAE 20025336 , 2002.
70. Wanker R., Raupenstrauch H. and Staudinger G. 'A fully distributed model for the simulation
of catalytic converter' Chemical Engineering Science 55, 2000, 4709-4718.
71. Wanker R., Wurzenberger J. C. and Higbie D. '1d and 3d CFD Simulation of Exhaust-Gas
Aftertreatment Devices: Parameter Optimization via Genetic Algorithm', Proceedings of
5th ASME/JSME Int. Symposium on Computational Technologies for Fluid/Thermal/Stress
Systems with Industrial Applications, San Diego, 2004
72. Wendland Daniel W. 'Automobile Exhaust-System Steady-State Heat Transfer', SAE
931085, 1993.
73. Wheeler A., In P.H. Emmett (Ed.), Catalysis, Reinhold New York, Vol II: 105, 1955.
74. Wilde Karl 'Erzwungene und freie Stroemung', Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, 2nd
edition, 1978.
75. Winkler C. and Floerchinger P., Patil, M.D., Gieshoff, J., Spurk, P., Pfeifer, M., 'Modeling of
SCR DeNOx Catalyst - Looking at the Impact of Substrate Attributes', SAE 2003-01-0845.
76. Wurzenberger J. C. and Peters B. 'Catalytic Converter in a 1D Cycle Simulation Code
Considering 3D Behavior', SAE 2003-01-1002, 2003.
77. Wurzenberger J. C. and Peters B. 'Design and Optimization of Catalytic Converters taking
into Account 3D and Transient Phenomena as an Integral Part in Engine Cycle Simulations',
97
FIRE BOOST Aftertreatment
3. Theory
ICES 2003-611, Proceedings of STC2003, ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division,
2003.
78. Wurzenberger J. C. and Wanker R. 'Multi-Scale SCR Modeling, 1D Kinetic Analysis and 3D
System Simulation', SAE 2005-01.
79. Wurzenberger J. C., Muenzer A., Peters B. and Wanker R. '1D/3D Simulation Workflow Optimization of Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment Devices', ATZ-Worldwide, 106(7-8):27-44, 2004.
80. Silvis, W. 'An Algorithm for Calculating the Air/Fuel Ratio from Exhaust Emissions', SAE
Technical Paper 970514, 1997.
3.10. Appendix
3.10.1. Analysis Formulae
(317)
(318)
A is an arbitrary element, z the number of oxygen atoms in the molecule AOz. x and y are the
number of carbon and hydrogen atoms in an arbitrary composition of a hydrocarbon CxHy,
respectively.
(319)
A is an arbitrary element, z the number of oxygen atoms in the molecule AOz. x and y are the
number of carbon and hydrogen atoms in an arbitrary composition of a hydrocarbon CxHy.
(320)
(321)
(322)
(323)
98
3. Theory
3.10.2. Conversion of Mole and Volume Fractions and ppm's to Mass Fractions and
Vice Versa
The correlation between mole fractions, volume fractions and parts per million (ppm) is given by:
One mole fraction is identical to one volume fraction
6
One mole fraction is 10 ppm
The evaluation of mass fractions out of mole (or volume) fractions is given by
(324)
where wk is the mass fraction, yk is the mole fraction and Mk is the molar mass of the species k.
The equation shows that for the evaluation of the individual k species mass fractions, the molar
masses of the K species have to be known. For a system consisting of H2 and O2 with identical
mole fractions (i.e. yH2=0.5, MH2 = 2 kg/kmol and yO2= 0.5, MO2 = 32 kg/kmol) the mass fractions
are given by:
(325)
The evaluation of mole (or volume) fractions out of mass fractions is given by the following
formula
(326)
For a system consisting of H2 and O2 with identical mass fractions (i.e. wH2 = 0.5, MH2 = 2 kg/
kmol and wO2=0.5, MO2 = 32 kg/kmol) the mole fractions are given by:
(327)
99
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
In this section the application FIRE Aftertreatment is presented.
4.1.3. Aftertreatment
The Aftertreatment parameter tree is displayed in the Modules folder as follows:
Figure 37. Aftertreatment Parameter Tree
Click on Aftertreatment TNG with the right mouse button to access the following options:
Import from BOOST
Catalyst: Insert
DPF: Insert
Reactive Porosity: Insert
page [101]
Refer to the corresponding sections Catalyst Specification
, General Particulate Filter
page [144]
page [165]
Specification,
Reactive Porosity Specification
and Aftertreatment-Device Import
page [178]
from BOOST
for further details.
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Copy from CAT allows the complete set of input data to be copied from Catalyst[X] to the
present catalyst.
Figure 38. Copy from CAT Function
NoSelection
(default)
NoSelection
(default)
NoSelection
(default)
Monolith initialization
temperature
293.15-1500 (K)
100-900 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.006-0.015 (in)
Washcoat thickness
0-0.003 (m)
0.50-0.75 (-)
Hydraulic
diameter
0.001-0.005 (m)
101
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.4.2. Pressure Drop Specification
The pressure loss of the flow within a catalytic converter is determined by a flow-resistance
model and corresponding parameters, which have to be supplied by the user. All necessary input
data are summarized in the following sections.
4.1.4.2.1. Pressure Drop Models
Four different pressure drop models are available to calculate the pressure drop within the
catalyst:
4.1.4.2.1.1. Tube Friction
The Tube Friction pressure drop model is especially applicable for flow through catalysts where
empirical data of the pressure drop are not available. The pressure drop is based on the flow of
fluid along the channels of the catalyst and the pressure drop is calculated due to the wall friction
within pipes:
(328)
wi
Lper
Wetted perimeter
To activate the Tube friction pressure drop model, select Tube friction from the Pressure drop
model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Shape factor
0.8-1 (-)
4.1.4.2.1.2. Forchheimer
If Forchheimer is chosen as pressure drop model, then the pressure gradients within the catalyst
channels are calculated with following equation
102
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
(329)
The linear and the quadratic term take into account the viscous losses and the inertial losses,
respectively, of the flow inside the catalyst channels.
Pressure gradient within porous material
2
To activate the Forchheimer pressure drop model, select Forchheimer from the Pressure drop
model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Zeta-value
0-100 (1/m)
Alpha value
0-10 (1/m )
Instead of the direct specification of the pressure drop model parameters Alpha and Zeta, a set of
corresponding measured pressure drop / velocity pairs and the corresponding reference density
and viscosity could be specified. During a pre-processing step FIRE then fits Alpha and Zeta
from this data.
Typical Values
and Ranges
3
Reference Density
0.5-50 (kg/m )
Reference
Viscosity
-7
-4
103
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Interstitial velocity This specifies the measured interstitial velocities
w
(for fitting Alpha and Zeta, at least three different
velocities are necessary).
Pressure Gradient
dp/dx
0-50 (m/s)
4.1.4.2.1.3. Re formulation
If Re formulation is chosen as pressure drop model, the pressure gradients within the catalyst
channels are calculated with following equation:
(330)
Lper
Wetted perimeter
wi
(square:0.89)
The friction factor f is described as a function of the Reynolds Number Re and changes
depending on the flow regime (laminar, transition or turbulent):
(331)
The bounds for the transition region from laminar to turbulent are set by Reynolds numbers of
Relam = 2300 and Returb = 5000. In the turbulent region, fturb is considered as a constant input
value. In the laminar region flam is given by
(332)
To activate the Re formulation pressure drop model, select Re formulation from the Pressure
drop model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
104
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Coefficient a
64 (-)
Coefficient b
-1 (-)
Turbulent
0.019
Channel Shape
Square: 0.89
To activate the power law pressure drop model, select Power law from the Pressure drop
model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical
Values and
Ranges
alpha-value
beta-value
0-2 (-)
This specifies the parameter defining the
dependency between the velocity and the pressure loss
per unit length of porous material.
4.1.4.2.1.5. User
If User is chosen as pressure drop model, the pressure drop is calculated according to the
coding in the user routine usepor_pres.f.
4.1.4.2.2. Turbulence Treatment
Within the single channels of a catalytic converter, the turbulence kinetic energy k is calculated
by the standard transport equation. To take into account the laminarization process within the
single channels the dissipation rate is calculated from the algebraic equation shown below:
(334)
Crel is a relative turbulent length scale, which is multiplied with the hydraulic channel diameter
dhyd and estimates the turbulence characteristics inside the monolith channels. Crel is a problem
dependent quantity which has to be specified by the user.
105
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Rel. turb. length
scale Crel
0.0001-0.02 (-)
400-2000 (kg/
3
m )
Thermal
conductivity
0.1-50 (W/(mK))
Anisotropic cond.
Factor
to define
0-10 (-)
Figure 39. User Defined Parameters for Effective Heat Conduction Specification
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Type of transport
coefficients
Mass Transfer
Multiplier
Sieder/Tate:
The Sieder/Tate correlation is used to calculate heat
page [29]
and mass transfer coefficients (Eq.78
).
Hawthorn:
The Hawthorn correlation is used to calculate heat
page [29]
and mass transfer coefficients (Eq.80
).
Hausen:
The Hausen correlation is used to calculate heat and
page [29]
mass transfer coefficients (Eq.79
).
constant:
Constant values which have to be defined by
the user are taken as heat and mass transfer
coefficients.
Sieder/Tate
(default)
0.1-10 (m/s)
0.01-10 (-)
Sieder/Tate:
The Sieder/Tate correlation is used to calculate heat
page [29]
and mass transfer coefficients (Eq.78
).
Hawthorn:
The Hawthorn correlation is used to calculate heat
page [29]
and mass transfer coefficients (Eq.80
).
Hausen:
The Hausen correlation is used to calculate heat and
page [29]
mass transfer coefficients (Eq.79
).
constant:
Constant values which have to be defined by
the user are taken as heat and mass transfer
coefficients.
Sieder/Tate
(default)
107
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
user:
The user can specify the transfer coefficients in
use_cattra.f.
Heat Transfer
Multiplier
0.1-10 (-)
0.001-0.2 (m)
Select HeatSource_X to open the window for the heat source specification. To delete a heat
source select the check box at delete? and click Delete external heat source.
Figure 41. Specification of External Heat Sources
Typical Values
and Ranges
Cell selection
Heat Source
108
NoSelection
to define
0-10 (W/m )
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.4.4. Washcoat
Two different approaches are available to model heterogeneous reactions. In the standard model
approach, the pore diffusion through the washcoat layer(s) is neglected. In the advanced model
approach, pore diffusion is taken into account. Therefore, every washcoat layer is discretized in
the direction perpendicular to the catalyst solid surface. The standard approach is equivalent to
the advanced approach with only one washcoat layer of one computational cell. Therefore, the
former specification at Conversion Reactions is now done at the My_Reaction branch. The
advanced approach, taking into account pore diffusion through the washcoat layers, requires the
specification of Transport Model and Reaction Model for each washcoat layer respectively.
Note:
For a deactivated button Activate Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model, the set-up of the
Conversion Reactions is located in the first reaction branch My_Reaction. For the
activated washcoat layer model one has to specify conversion reactions as well as a
transport model for every layer separately.
Note:
The washcoat layer (WCL) model requires a Washcoat Thickness greater than zero to
be specified at Catalyst Specification.
Figure 42. Washcoat - Activated Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model
If Activate Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model is selected, the following input data has to be
specified:
Typical Values
and Ranges
-6
Layer Thickness
10 -1 (-)
1-10 (-)
109
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Ref. WCL Volume
Density
400-2000 (kg/m )
Reaction Model
My_Reaction
(default)
Transport Model
My_Transport
(default)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The different reactions can be en/disabled individually by clicking the corresponding check
boxes. This enables sub-pages for the detailed specification of the reaction parameters.
R1: CO Oxidation
R3: NO Oxidation
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
Approach 2
111
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
E
112
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
law. The reaction order of carbon monoxide is a function of the
carbon monoxide concentration itself and therefore the order
changes between lean and rich conditions.
R4: H2 Oxidation
R5: NO Oxidation
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
Approach 2
113
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
114
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
of the temperature and is derived from the free Gibbs reaction
enthalpy.
R10-R13: Ce Storage
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
R11
R12
R13
115
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R14-R19: Rh Storage
Cerium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
CeO2
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
CeO2
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
Rhodium
Storage
Capacity
116
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R20-R21: Ba Storage
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
RhO
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
RhO
K1 - K6
E1 - E6
R21
Barium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
R22: HC Storage
117
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Metal
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
C3H6
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
C3H6
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined sorption-equilibrium and ad/desorption
mechanisms.
E1 - E2
The different reactions can be enabled/disabled individually by clicking the corresponding check
boxes. This enables sub-pages for the detailed specification of the reaction parameters.
R1: HNCO Hydrolysis
118
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R2: NO Reduction
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
119
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R7: NO Oxidation
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
Approach 2
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
account. The rate equation and a set of default values of all kinetic parameters are given. The
user can adjust all kinetic parameters. More detailed information about this model is given in
page [83]
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient Approach
.
Length of Section 1
Length of Section 2
The different reactions can be en/disabled individually by clicking the corresponding check
boxes. This enables sub-pages for the detailed specification of the reaction parameters.
R1: HNCO Hydrolysis
Determines the frequency factors used in the predefined power law mechanism.
R3
NH3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
Coverage
Determines a surface coverage dependency in the
Dependency pre-defined ad/desorption mechanisms.
(epsilon)
Max
Surface
121
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
NH3
Determines the order of NH3 surface coverage
Surface
fraction in the adsorption rate formulation.
Coverage
Range: 0-2 (-)
Fraction
Dependency
m
R4: NO Reduction
122
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R9: NO Oxidation
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient oxidation mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law oxidation mechanism.
Approach 2
123
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
E1
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law conversion mechanism.
R2: NO Oxidation
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
124
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R3-R4: Ba Storage
R4
Barium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
K1 - K4
125
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
E1 - E4
Reaction
Order m
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
R2: CO Oxidation
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene, nitric
Orders m, n, oxide and oxygen in the pre-defined Langmuirp
Hinshelwood conversion mechanism.
R3: C3H6 Oxidation
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of oxygen and nitric
Orders m, n oxide in the pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood
conversion mechanism.
R4: NO Oxidation
126
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Kinetic
Determines a kinetic coefficient used in the
Coefficient f pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood conversion
mechanism.
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene, nitric
Orders m, n, oxide and oxygen in the pre-defined Langmuirp
Hinshelwood conversion mechanism.
R5: NO Reduction H2
K1
E1
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
R6: NO Reduction CO
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene and nitric
Orders m, n oxide in the pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood
conversion mechanism.
R7: NO Reduction
C3H6
K1
E1
K1 - K4
127
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
E1 - E4
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Reaction
Order m
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Ce Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
CeO2
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of oxygen stored on
Orders m, n, the surface and oxygen ratio at the surface in the
p, q
pre-defined ad/desorption mechanism.
128
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
R12-R16: Surface
Storage on Barium
Carbonate
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
BaCO3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
Rate
approach 1
Rate
approach 2
K1 - K5
129
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
E1 - E5
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of Ba(NO3)2 in the
Orders m, n, pre-defined ad/desorption mechanism of Rate
p, q, r
approach 2.
R12-R16: Ash Core
Model
R13
R14
R15
R16
Particle
Radius
Min
Specific
Surface
Max
Specific
Surface
Pore
Diffusion
Coefficient
Scaling
The LNT model assumes that NOx desorption
Factor
(regeneration) takes place faster than NOx
During
adsorption (storage). This factor increases the pore
Regeneration diffusion coefficient during regeneration.
Typical Value: 10 (-)
130
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.4.4.1.7. User Defined Reactions (Without Archive)
This reaction model offers the possibility to define an arbitrary number of conversion reactions
and surface storage mechanisms at different surface sites. The rate equation and a set of default
values of all kinetic parameters are given. The user can adjust all kinetic parameters. More
page [78]
detailed information about this model is given in Section TWC Catalyst Reactions
.
4.1.4.4.1.7.1. Surface Species
Select Surface species in the parameter tree and select the Activate surface species toggle
switch to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Number of surface
sites
0-4 (-)
Ratio catalytic/
geometric surface
area
1-30 (-)
After entering a value >0 for Number of surface sites, the project tree expands and the
corresponding input window for each site type appears.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Name
NoName
No. of surface
species on site
1-3 (-)
Site density
in equation (Eq.34
page [15]
0-0.03 (mol/m )
Initial coverage
fractions
0-1 (-)
131
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Note:
As for the gas phase species, FIRE must find the names of all surface species in the
internal thermochemistry database or in the CHEMKIN database thermdat.
4.1.4.4.1.7.2. Stoichiometry Specification
Select Stoichiometry specification in the parameter tree and then enter the following:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Number of
reactions
A set of chemical reactions can be entered. The input conventions for each reaction are:
Use one line for each reaction
Only use species defined either as gas phase species or as surface species
Indicate surface species by adding "_S1", "_S2", "_S3", etc to the species' name. The index
depends on the actual surface site index, e.g. "_S2" for all surface species on the second
surface site.
Separate reactants from products by "="
Separate species by "+"
Separate species from stoichiometric coefficient by "*"
Use "/" to specify extra options like arbitrary reaction order "RO" or the surface coverage
parameters "COV".
Blanks between the separators ("=", "*", "+", and "/") and the species names or values are
ignored.
Use UPPERCASE characters for species names
For reversible reactions it is recommended to specify the forward and backward reactions
including all extra options separately, if the Equilibrium option of the current reaction is
disabled.
E.g.: NO + 0.5*O2 = NO2
NO2 = NO + 0.5*O2
132
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The mass balance and the conservation of surface sites are checked by FIRE at runtime.
An example for oxygen storage is O2+2*PT_S1=2*O_S1
Particulate filter model:
"C_P" is the identifier for the solid carbon in the soot layer.
An example for the oxidation of solid carbon to carbon dioxide is:
C_P+O2=CO2
Arbitrary reaction order:
page [26]
For elementary reactions the reaction orders (Eq.62
) are determined by the stoichiometric
coefficients. However, often in real-world applications measurements find that the reaction rate
is proportional to the concentration of a species raised to some arbitrary power. FIRE allows
declaring the reaction order for any species participating in the chemical reaction by specification
of the keyword 'RO'.
Therefore, the user has to attach the extra options starting with "/", setting the keyword "RO", the
species name and the new value of the reaction order, as described by:
<stoichiometry> / RO <species1> <value 1> / RO <species2> <value2>
The following example shows the change of the reaction orders for the NO-oxidation. Forward
and backward reactions are specified separately.
NO + 0.5*O2 = NO2 / RO NO 1.04 / RO O2 0.46
NO2 = NO + 0.5*O2 / RO NO2 1.03
Note, if the Activation of the current reaction is set to User, the reaction order is not
changed automatically, since in this case the reaction rate has to be specified by the user in
use_catrat.f or use_dpfrat.f.
Surface coverage parameters:
FIRE allows modifying the Arrhenius expression for the reaction rate constant
by the coverage
of some surface species (identified by strings "_S1", "_S2", etc attached to the species name).
page [27]
There the three surface coverage parameters of reaction i in Eq.66
,
,
, and
can be
specified as extra option via the keyword 'COV', as described by:
<stoichiometry> / COV <species1> <eta 1> <mu 1> <epsilon 1> / COV ...
The following example shows the set-up of the surface coverage parameters for the ammonia
desorption:
ME-NH3_S1 = NH3 + ME_S1 / COV ME-NH3 0.0 1.0 -0.256
Here
= 0.0,
= 1.0 and
= -0.256.
Note, if the Activation of the current reaction is set to User, the surface coverage parameters
are not taken into account automatically, since in this case the reaction rate has to be specified
by the user in use_catrat.f or use_dpfrat.f.
4.1.4.4.1.7.3. Kinetic Parameters Specification
Select Kinetic parameters specification in the parameter tree to access the following input
fields.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Number of kinetic
models
1-3 (-)
In general three flags (activation type, chemical equilibrium, sticking coefficient type) and three
parameters (frequency factor, temperature exponent, activation energy) should be supplied for
each reaction.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Activation
On:
On (default)
133
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Activates the standard rate equation (equation Eq.61
).
Off:
Completely deactivates the reaction.
User:
The user can specify the rate of the reaction in
use_catrat.f.
If the catalyst is assigned to be a particulate
filter, the user specifies the rate of the reaction in
use_dpfrat.f.
page [26]
Equilibrium
Sticking
Coefficient
Off (default)
Frequency factor
0-10
s, k)
Temperature
Exponent
0-1 (-)
Activation Energy
0-50000 (kJ/
kmol)
15
(kmol, m,
indicates that the user can input values in a table relating to the number of kinetic models.
The following options are available:
1. Constant
This is the default setting and specifies that the parameter value entered in the field will
remain constant for all kinetic models.
2. Model
Select it to open an input table where parameter values can be entered for each kinetic
model separately.
Select the User parameter toggle switch to activate the following:
Default
134
Default
Default
UP_1
UP_6
UP_11
UP_2
UP_7
UP_12
UP_3
UP_8
UP_13
UP_4
UP_9
UP_14
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
UP_5
UP_10
UP_15
The user can input up to 15 user parameters for each reaction. These values are not used by
FIRE directly, but they can be accessed by the user in use_catrat.f when supplying his own
kinetic models.
4.1.4.4.1.8. Map Based Conversion
This model comprises different input of conversion maps, where the user can specify the
conversion of selected species depending on several conditions like massflow, substrate
temperature and further more.
Species conversion maps can be added or removed by clicking the right mouse button on the
tree node Map Based Conversion.
Conversion Definition
The following input data has to be specified:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Species
Conversion
Conversion Table
135
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Conversion
Dependency 1
and Conversion
Dependency 2
Conversion Map
Description
Select Archive
Reload Archive
Reload the Archive from the selected row. In order to reset the
Model Parameters with the default values from the AUCI model
click "No" in the pop-up box "Keep current parameter values?".
Edit Archive
Model Parameters
page [21]
).
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Note:
For specification of the transport model, Activate Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model must
be active.
The transport model has to be specified for each washcoat layer separately. The following
models are available:
4.1.4.4.2.1. Constant Pore Diffusion
For this model constant diffusion coefficients are applied.
If Constant Pore Diffusion is selected, the following input data has to be specified:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Layer Porosity
0-1 (-)
Diffusion
Coefficients
10
-14
-5
-10 (m /s)
0-1 (-)
Tortuosity
1-5 (-)
Scaling Factors
wcl
of the washcoat
0-100 (-)
Micropore Porosity
0-1 (-)
Macropore Diameter
10 -10 (m)
Micropore Diameter
10 -10 (m)
0-1 (-)
-8
-4
-9
-5
137
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Scaling Factors
0-100 (-)
0-1 (-)
Tortuosity
1-5 (-)
Pore Diameter
10 -10 (m)
Scaling Factors
0-100 (-)
wcl
of the washcoat
-9
-3
Parameter Label
Transport Parameter
0-1 (-)
138
20000 (-)
Catalytic reaction
solver: relative
tolerance
1e-05 (-)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Catalytic reaction
solver: absolute
tolerance
Specifies the absolute tolerance for the solution of the 1e-08 (-)
reaction rate equation system. Normally no changes
are required.
0-20 (-)
Reaction solver
block size
Solve catalytic
reactions
Active (default)
Active (default)
Activate user
Activates/deactivates the user function
model for
use_catmod.f. This user function is called by FIRE
catalytic reactions instead of the FIRE catalyst reaction model. Here
(use_catmod.f)
the user defines the source terms for the species
transport equations and the enthalpy equation. It
is typically used by advanced users who have their
own models available and need full flexibility for their
implementation. Please contact FIRE support for
more information on use_catmod.f.
Inactive (default)
Off (default)
139
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.4.6.1. Substrate Data
Typical Values
and Ranges
Mean catalyst
temperature
Active (default)
Maximum
catalyst
temperature
Active (default)
Active (default)
Solid heat
capacities
Inactive (default)
Solid thermal
conductivities
Gradient of solid
temperature
Inactive (default)
Centricity index
140
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The centricity index is determined at the inlet face
selection of the particulate filter according to equation
, where the eccentricity
denotes the
Tangential inlet
velocity
Tangential inlet
Activates/deactivates the output of the mean, the
pressure gradient minimum, and the maximum tangential pressure
gradient [Pa/m] of the catalyst inlet to the .fla file and
to the .fl2 file.
The tangential inlet pressure gradient is the amount of
the gradient components which point into the direction
Inactive (default)
141
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
perpendicular to the catalyst direction. It is evaluated
in the last non-porous fluid cell layer in front of the
catalyst.
Gas hourly space Activates/deactivates the output of the gas hourly
velocity (GHSV)
space velocity at operation conditions (GHSV) (1/h)
and the gas hourly space velocity at norm conditions
(GHSVn) (1/h) of the catalyst to the .fla file and to
the .fl2 file.
The gas hourly space velocity is the volume flux of
the gas divided by the entire volume of the catalyst or
particulate filter. The GHSV at operation conditions is
calculated by:
Inactive (default)
4.1.4.6.4. Conversions
Typical Values
and Ranges
Species
conversions
Inactive (default)
Excess oxygen
ratio at inlet
Inactive (default)
142
Active (default)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
molecule CxHy is x the number of carbon and y the
number of hydrogen atoms respectively.
Redox ratio at
inlet
Inactive (default)
Inactive (default)
WCL Mass
Fraction
Inactive (default)
WCL Species
Concentration
Inactive (default)
WCL Effective
Diffusion
Coefficient
Inactive (default)
WCL Species
Rate
WCL Reaction
Rate
WCL Stored
Species Fraction
Inactive (default)
WCL Stored
Species Loading
Inactive (default)
143
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5. Particulate Filter Specification
To add a Particulate Filter (DPF) to the project, click on Aftertreatment TNG in the parameter
tree with the right mouse button and select DPF: Insert from the submenu. To delete a DPF
from the project, click on the name of the DPF (i.e. DPF[1]) with the right mouse button and
select Remove from the submenu.
The specification of the particulate filter follows the input concept of the catalytic converter
page [100]
presented in Section Catalyst Specification
.
Figure 44. DPF Specification Parameter Tree
Copy from DPF allows the complete set of input data to be copied from DPF[X] to the present
DPF.
Figure 45. Copy from DPF function
144
Cell selection
NoSelection
(default)
NoSelection
(default)
Monolith initialization
temperature
293.15-1500 (K)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.1.2. Square Cell + Asymmetrical Cell PF
Click on Square + Asymmetrical Cell PF to obtain the parameter specification of the square cell
PF.
Typical Values
and Ranges
2
100-900 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.006-0.015 (in)
Enable
Enables the calculation for asymmetrical channel
Asymmetrical
diameters.
Channel Diameters
Off (default)
Ratio of Channel
Diameters
1-1.4 (-)
0.5-0.75 (-)
Hydraulic
diameter
4.1.5.1.4. Hexahex
Click on Hexahex to obtain the following parameter specification.
Typical Values
and Ranges
2
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
200-500 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (in)
0.666 (-)
(default)
Perimeter
Efficiency (a)
0.0-1.0 (-)
145
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.1.5. Hex3
Click on Hex3 to obtain the following parameter specification.
Typical Values
and Ranges
2
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
200-500 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (in)
Perimeter
Efficiency (a)
0.0-1.0 (-)
Nr of Inlet
Determines the number of inlet channels per unity
Channels per Unity cell.
Cell
1-3 (-)
Nr of Outlet
Determines the number of outlet channels per unity
Channels per Unity cell.
Cell
1 (-)
Nr of GSEs per
Inlet Channel
1-12 (-)
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (-)
Center Corner
Determines the sum of the angles
Angle (alpha+beta) general symmetry element.
146
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
and
of the
45-90 (deg)
Right Corner
Angle (gamma)
of the GSE.
45-90 (deg)
of the GSE.
45-90 (deg)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Side length (l1)
0.1-1 (mm)
0.1-1 (mm)
Filtration
Efficiency at l1
0-1 (-)
Filtration
Efficiency at l2
Channel Shape
Factor
Outlet Channel
Perimeter
Outlet Channel
Cross Section
0.5-1 (-)
0.5-5 (mm )
400-2000 (kg/
3
m )
Thermal
conductivity
0.1-50 (W/(mK))
Anisotropic cond.
Factor
to define
0-10 (-)
147
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
value of 1.0 simulates an isotropic conductivity. A
value of 0.5 would be a good choice for monoliths.
The anisotropic conduction factor is not used if the
user-defined parameter ATM_ACTIV_RADIATION
is specified and the current catalyst is selected (Fig.
page [106]
39
). Then the effective thermal conductivity
including radiation is used instead of the default
anisotropic model (see section Anisotropic Heat
page [10]
Conduction Matrix
).
4.1.5.1.7.1. Glueing Zones
Typical Values
and Ranges
On/Off
Off (default)
Selection
NoSelection
(default)
Initialization
temperature
293.15-1500 (K)
Density
400-2000 (kg/
3
m )
Thermal
Conductivity
0.1-50 (W/(mK))
Specific Heat
500-2500 (J/
kgK)
Filter area
reduction
Off (default)
148
On/Off
Off (default)
Selection
NoSelection
(default)
Reduction factor
0-1 (-)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.1.8. External Heat Source
FIRE allows to specify constant heat sources arbitrary cell selections. The setup is the same as
page [108]
for the catalyst which is explained in section External Heat Source
.
4.1.5.2. Soot and Filter Properties
Select Soot and Filter Properties in the parameter tree to access the following input fields.
The soot and filter properties comprise thermodynamic data of the soot and fluid mechanic
information of the soot and the filter. Additionally a particle mass can be specified that is used as
initial condition for all soot mass balances.
4.1.5.2.1. Soot Layer Properties
Typical Values
and Ranges
3
Layer Packing
Density
5-30 (kg/m )
Migration
Constant
1E-15-1E-5 (-)
Wall Permeability
1E-15-1E-12 (m )
Soot Permeability
1E-16-1E-13 (m )
Enable Depth
Filtration
Off (default)
Sublayer
Thickness
10-100 (micron)
Depth Filtration
Threshold
0-3 (g/l)
Depth Filtration
Permeability
1E-16-1E-13 (m )
Inlet Loss
Coefficient
0.5-10 (-)
Outlet Loss
Coefficient
0.5-10 (-)
Consider Inlet/
Outlet Plugs
Off (default)
Length of PF Inlet- Determines the length of the inlet and outlet plugs.
Outlet Plugs
0-20 (mm)
149
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.2.3. Filter Inlet Boundary Condition
Typical Values
and Ranges
Csoot [kg
Particles/kg Gas]
0-1 (kg/kg)
0-20 [kgsoot /
3
m Filter]
0 (default)
1.0-100 (-)
Off (default)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
3
Ash Packing
Density
100-500 (kg/m )
Ash Permeability
1E-15-1E-13 (m )
Off (default)
Ash Layer/Plug
Determines the ratio of ash that is stored in the
Distribution Factor ash layer to ash stored in the ash plug. A factor of
1 means all the ash is stored in the layer. A factor
of 0 means all the ash is stored in the ash plug. If
the ash loading is not specified as constant value
but as function of the filter length, the shape of the
axial profile is kept but scaled down by the ashdistribution factor.
(0-1) (-)
Ash Mass
0-100 (g/l)
On /Off
-6
-5
O2-thermal
page
151
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
O2-fuel-additive
O2-NO2
O2-NO2-NO2catalytic
User Defined
PF Zone Coating
Table
CO-HC-NOConversion
Selective
Catalytic
Reduction
User Defined
Fraction of
Catalytic Wall
Height
0-1 (-)
On/Off
Note:
The activation of Regeneration Mode Sublayer is only possible if depth filtration is
activated (Enable Depth Filtration at Soot and Filter Properties).
152
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.4.1. Soot Regeneration Mode
O2 - Thermal
O2 - Fuel Additive
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
153
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
can choose the table option to specify individual
values for each coating section.
Ef
O2 - NO2
O2
K1
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E1
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
NO2
154
K3
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E3
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
O2 - NO2-NO2-Catalytic O2
K1
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E1
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
NO2
K3-K4
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E3-E4
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
NO2- Catalytic
K5
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
155
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E5
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
156
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
mechanism (see Section Filter CSF Catalytic
page [92]
Reactions
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
R4: NO Oxidation
NH3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
Coverage
Determines a surface coverage dependency in
Dependency the pre-defined ad-/desorption mechanisms (see
(epsilon)
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Typical Values & Ranges: 0-1[-]
Max
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
NH3
Surface
Coverage
Fraction
Dependency
m
K1 - K2
Determine frequency factors used in the predefined ad/desorption mechanisms (see Section
HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient Approach
157
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
page [83]
R3: NO Reduction
158
E1 - E2
Critical
Surface
Coverage
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Critical
Surface
Coverage
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Critical
Surface
Coverage
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law oxidation mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
R8: NO Oxidation
Rate Approach 1
K
159
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The user can choose the table option to specify
individual values for each coating section.
A
Rate Approach 2
K, KR
E, ER
A, AR
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
160
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.5. Reaction Solver Specification
Select PF Reaction Solver Specification in the parameter tree to access the following input
fields.
4.1.5.5.1. Reaction Solver Parameters
Typical Values
Regeneration
reaction solver:
max. no. of
iterations
20000 (-)
Regeneration
reaction solver:
relative tolerance
1e-05 (-)
Regeneration
Specifies the absolute tolerance for the solution of the 1e-08 (-)
reaction solver:
reaction rate equation system. Normally no changes
absolute tolerance are required.
4.1.5.5.2. General Settings
Typical Values
and Ranges
Implicit DPF flow
solution
0.2-10 (-)
161
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
On / Off
Off (default)
Active (default)
Maximum DPF
temperature
Active (default)
Minimum DPF
temperature
Active (default)
Solid heat
capacities
Solid thermal
conductivities
Gradient of solid
temperature
to define
Inactive (default)
162
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.5.6.3. Soot
Typical Values
and Ranges
Total particle
mass
Inactive (default)
Specific particle
mass
Active (default)
Particle
deposition rate
Inactive (default)
Centricity index
Max./Min. inlet
velocities
Tangential inlet
velocity
Inactive (default)
163
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
the particulate filter inlet to the .fla file and to the .fl2
file.
The tangential inlet velocity is described in the
2D results of the catalyst in section 2D Output
page [139]
Specification
.
Tangential inlet
Activates/deactivates the output of the mean, the
pressure gradient minimum, and the maximum tangential pressure
gradient [Pa/m] of the particulate filter inlet to the .fla
file and to the .fl2 file.
The tangential inlet pressure gradient is described
in the 2D results of the catalyst in section 2D Output
page [139]
Specification
.
Inactive (default)
Inactive (default)
4.1.5.6.5. Conversions
Typical Values
and Ranges
Species
conversions
Active (default)
Excess oxygen
ratio at inlet
Redox ratio at
inlet
Inactive (default)
Off (default)
50
E.g.:
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
1 axial coordinate (m)
2 wall velocity (-)
3 V1 (m/s)
4 V2 (m/s)
5 h_soot (m)
6 Gas temperature (K)
7 Solid temperature (K)
8 Cell number
Copy from RPOR allows the complete set of input data to be copied from RPOR[X] to the
present reactive porosity.
Figure 48. Copy from RPOR Function
Mesh requirements
fulfilled
Yes (default)
Specified inlet/outlet
of reactive porosity
Active (default)
NoSelection
(default)
165
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
porosity. Only available for activated Specified
inlet/outlet of reactive porosity.
Outlet face selection
NoSelection
(default)
RPOR initialization
temperature
293.15-1500 (K)
0.1-0.95 (-)
Geometric surface
area (GSA)
100-10000 (m /
3
m )
The linear term and the quadratic terms take into account the viscous and the inertial losses,
respectively, of the flow through the reactive porosity.
Pressure gradient within porous material
2
To activate the Forchheimer pressure drop model, select Forchheimer from the Pressure drop
model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
and Ranges
166
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Zeta-value
Alpha value
4.1.6.2.1.2. Carman-Kozeny
If Carman-Kozeny is chosen as pressure drop model, then the pressure gradients within the
reactive porosity is calculated with following equation
(336)
CCK is the Carman-Kozeny constant usually 150, is the molecular dynamic viscosity of domain
2
fluid in (Ns/m ), ui is the superficial and wi is the interstitial velocity in (m/s), is the fluid volume
fraction (porosity) in (-), and dp is the equivalent solid particle diameter.
To activate the Carman-Kozeny pressure drop model, select Carman-Kozeny from the
Pressure drop model pull-down menu to access the following input fields:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Model constant C1 Specifies the Carman-Kozeny constant.
0-1500 (-)
0.0001-0.005
(m)
4.1.6.2.1.3. User
If User is chosen as pressure drop model, the pressure drop is calculated according to the
coding in the user routine usepor_pres.f.
4.1.6.2.2. Turbulence Treatment
Within the interstices of the porosity the turbulence kinetic energy k is calculated by the standard
transport equation. To take into account the laminarization process within the pores, the
dissipation rate is calculated from the algebraic equation shown below:
(337)
Crel is a relative turbulent length scale, which is multiplied with the hydraulic pore diameter
dhyd and estimates the turbulence characteristics inside the porosity block. Crel is a problem
dependent quantity which has to be specified by the user.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Rel. turb. length
scale Crel
0.0001-0.02 (-)
Hydraulic pore
diameter dhyd
page
0.0001-0.005 (m)
167
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.6.3. Physical Properties of Reactive Porosities
Select RPOR Physical Properties in the parameter tree to access the following input fields.
4.1.6.3.1. RPOR Physical Properties
Typical Values
and Ranges
Density
Thermal conductivity
Specific heat
to define
Anisotropic cond.
Factor
400-2000 (kg/
3
m )
0.1-10 (m/s)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Equivalent particle Specifies the diameter of an equivalent solid sphere
diameter
of the granulated material.
0.0001-0.005
(m)
Shape factor mass Specifies the shape factor of the Sherwood number
transfer
for the mass transfer according to fe in section VDI
page [30]
Packed Bed
.
1-2.1 (-)
4.1.6.3.2.3. User
The user can specify the transfer coefficients in use_cattra.f.
4.1.6.3.3. Heat Transfer Models
4.1.6.3.3.1. Constant
Constant values which have to be defined by the user are taken as heat transfer coefficients.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Heat transfer
coefficient
0.0001-0.005
(m)
4.1.6.3.3.3. User
The user can specify the transfer coefficients in use_cattra.f.
4.1.6.3.4. RPOR Segmentation
FIRE provides a simple model to take into account perforations in the reactive porosities. The
page [108]
setup is the same as for catalysts explained in section Catalyst Segmentation
.
4.1.6.3.5. External Heat Source
FIRE allows to specify constant heat sources for arbitrary cell selections. The setup is the same
page [108]
as for catalysts explained in section External Heat Source
.
4.1.6.4. Conversion Reactions
FIRE offers the possibility to compute chemical reactions inside the reactive porosity. Either no
reactions are taken into account or the application of user defined models is possible.
4.1.6.4.1. User Defined Kinetic Reactions
The specification of the user defined kinetic reactions is identical to that of the catalyst described
page [131]
in section User Defined Reactions (Without Archive)
.
169
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.6.5. Reactive Porosity Reaction Solver Specification
Select RPOR Reaction Solver Specification in the parameter tree to access the following input
fields.
4.1.6.5.1. Reaction Solver Parameters
Typical Values
Reactive porosity
solver: max.
number of
iterations
20000 (-)
Reactive porosity
solver: relative
tolerance
1e-05 (-)
Reactive porosity
solver: absolute
tolerance
Specifies the absolute tolerance for the solution of the 1e-08 (-)
reaction rate equation system. Normally no changes
are required.
0-100 (-)
Active (default)
Activate user
Activates/deactivates the user function
Inactive (default)
model for
use_catmod.f. This user function is called by the
catalytic reactions CFD solver instead of the RPOR reaction model. Here
(use_catmod.f)
the user defines the source terms for the species
transport equations and the enthalpy equation. It
is typically used by advanced users who have their
own models available and need full flexibility for their
implementation. Please contact FIRE support for
more information on use_catmod.f.
170
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.6.6. Spray Particle Interaction
Select Spray particle interaction in the parameter tree. If the Spray module is deactivated, the
button Activate is greyed out, otherwise one clicks on Activate to access the following input
fields.
4.1.6.6.1. Collision
Typical Values
and Ranges
O'Rourke based
User
Off (default)
Collision factor
1 (-) (default)
On (default)
User
Off (default)
Maximum
deviation angle
65-85 (deg)
Number of
secondary
droplets
2-4 (-)
1-5 (-)
Energy
redistribution
factor
171
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.6.7.1. Substrate Data
Typical Values
and Ranges
Mean porosity
temperature
Active (default)
Maximum
porosity
temperature
Active (default)
Minimum
porosity
temperature
Active (default)
Solid heat
capacities
Inactive (default)
Gradient of solid
temperature
Inactive (default)
172
Uniformity index
Centricity index
Inactive (default)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The definition of the centricity index is described in
the 2D results of the catalyst in section 2D Output
page [139]
Specification
.
Max./Min. inlet
velocities
Tangential inlet
velocity
Inactive (default)
Tangential inlet
Activates/deactivates the output of the mean, the
pressure gradient minimum, and the maximum tangential pressure
gradient (Pa/m) of the RPOR inlet to the .fla file and
to the .fl2 file. Output is only available if Specified
inlet/outlet of reactive porosity is active.
The tangential inlet pressure gradient is described
in the 2D results of the catalyst in section 2D Output
page [139]
Specification
.
Inactive (default)
173
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
The species conversion is described in the 2D results
page
of the catalyst in section 2D Output Specification
[139]
.
Surface coverage Activates/deactivates the output of the mean surface
fraction
coverage fractions (-) of the surface species of the
RPOR to the .fla file and to the .fl2 file.
Inactive (default)
Excess oxygen
ratio at inlet
Redox ratio at
inlet
Active (default)
Surface coverage
fraction
Active (default)
4.1.7.2. Extended
Typical Values
and Ranges
174
Heat transfer
coefficients
Inactive (default)
Solid heat
capacity
Inactive (default)
Solid thermal
conductivity
Inactive (default)
Mass transfer
coefficients
Inactive (default)
Rates of user
defined chemical
reaction
Inactive (default)
Production/
depletion rates of
chemical species
Inactive (default)
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Tangential inlet
velocity
Tangential inlet
pressure gradient
Inactive (default)
Gradient of solid
temperature
Inactive (default)
Inactive (default)
WCL Mass
Fraction
Inactive (default)
WCL Species
Concentration
Inactive (default)
WCL Effective
Diffusion
Coefficient
Inactive (default)
WCL Species
Rate
Inactive (default)
WCL Reaction
Rate
Inactive (default)
WCL Stored
Species Fraction
Inactive (default)
WCL Stored
Species Loading
Inactive (default)
175
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
4.1.8.1.1. Mesh Requirements for Catalyst and Particulate Filter
The flow through a catalyst or a particulate filter is determined by the channel shaped structure
of the monolith. Thus, the monolith is modeled as directed porosity for which the following mesh
requirements have to be taken into account:
Arbitrary interfaces are not allowed within the porosity (catalyst or particulate filter) blocks.
The distance between arbitrary interfaces and the porosity/fluid interfaces must be at least
two cell layers (see the following figure).
The catalyst or the particulate filter block must be a structured, direction-aligned grid.
Porosity/fluid interfaces must be plane and normal to the porosity direction.
Figure 49. Mesh Requirements for Catalysts and Particulate Filters
176
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
Note:
Any "_indivisible" or "_domain_"-selections and arbitrary-interface-cell-layers are
processed afterwards.
4.1.8.2.2. MPI Decomposition for Particulate Filter
Contrary to the catalyst selection the MPI decomposition of PF blocks is not arbitrary. The MPI
interface must be aligned along the porosity block direction. This means that the PF cell rows
in porosity direction (representing a certain number of PF channels) must not be located on
different domains.
Note:
The MPI decomposition of PF blocks is not arbitrary. To avoid PF channels splitting onto
different domains, the decomposition must be topologically normal to the front surface of
the PF.
By specification of "_domain_"-selections one can influence the MPI decomposition. The
following figure shows the specification of the selections for the domain decomposition of a
simulation with 4 CPUs.
Figure 50. Example of Manual Domain Decomposition of a PF for 4 CPUs
If the cell selections are specified in that way, PF channels are not distributed onto more than
one domain and the decomposition requirement for PF is fulfilled. The names of the selections
are composed by the selection name plus the domain extensions "_domain_X" starting at index
zero (e.g. mesh_domain_0, mesh_domain_1, mesh_domain_2, mesh_domain_3,..). This method
is sophisticated and leads to an excellent load balance, since the user specifies exactly on which
domain which PF channel row is calculated.
However, the creation the cell selections may be circuitous, and if one changes the number of
processors of the simulation, one has to create new selections. Therefore, FIRE offers a more
convenient way for the domain decomposition. If face-selections with the names
<prefix>"_decomp_struct_front_"<value> and <prefix>"_decomp_struct_end"
are found, then they are considered as the front and back sides of a structured cell-block,
where the decomposition is performed only topologically normal to the front surface. If there is
no "_decomp_struct_end" face selection, the structured block ends at the mesh boundary
or as soon as a non-sweepable cell is encountered, the suffix <value> specifies the cell
count weighting factor, similar to that already described in section MPI Decomposition for
page [176]
Catalyst
for the catalysts. The specified weight is assigned to the cells in the structured
block. If no specific weight will be assigned, the suffix <value> can be omitted. The prefix
may be any name, but any "decomp_struct_end"-selection must have the same prefix
as the corresponding "decomp_struct_front"-selection. An arbitrary number of such
"decomp_weight"- or "decomp_struct_front"-selections may exist, but the structured
cell-blocks must not overlap. Also here, any "_indivisible" or "_domain_"-selections and
arbitrary-interface-cell-layers are processed afterwards.
The quantity of the weighting factor depends on the set-up of the PF model, i.e. if there are
chemical reactions active or not and if yes, how many chemical reactions are active, which PF
177
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
models are active (Depth filtration), etc. For many cases a weighting factor of 2 seems to be a
good choice.
The following figure shows an example of the face selections applied for weighted
decomposition. The prefix "DEC_DPF_0" and the suffix "2" determine the names of
the front and backside selections "DEC_DPF_0_decomp_struct_front_2" and
"DEC_DPF_0_decomp_struct_end". For correct decomposition, these selections are located
one cell layer before and after the PF block.
Figure 51. Face Selections for Weighted MPI Decomposition of a PF
178
use_catrat.f
use_cattra.f
use_dpfrat.f
4. FIRE Aftertreatment
in the cake as well as in the depth layer. Refer to the User
Functions Code Manual for details.
REACTIONS
2O+M<=>O2+M
1.200E+17
-1.000
.00
H2/2.40/ H2O/15.40/ CH4/2.00/ CO/1.75/ CO2/3.60/ C2H6/3.00/
AR/ .83/
O+H+M<=>OH+M
5.000E+17
-1.000
.00
H2/2.00/ H2O/6.00/ CH4/2.00/ CO/1.50/ CO2/2.00/ C2H6/3.00/ AR/ .70/
O+H2<=>H+OH
3.870E+04
2.700
6260.00
END
The chemistry interpreter reads this input file during the preprocessing and creates an Info file
('input_file_name'_out.dat in the input file directory) with the specified chemistry.
Currently about 95% of the auxiliary-keywords known by the CHEMKIN-II Version 4.9, April 1994,
DOUBLE PRECISION are considered by the interpreter. Therefore it is capable of reading and
interpreting the corresponding chem.inp files.
179
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
In this section the application BOOST Aftertreatment is presented.
General information about how to use the BOOST pre- and post-processor is available in the
BOOST Users Guide and the IMPRESS Chart Users Guide.
Aftertreatment examples are available on the installation media and described in the BOOST
AT Examples Manual. A detailed step by step explanation of how to use BOOST Aftertreatment
Analysis is available in the BOOST Aftertreatment Primer and on the installation media.
Note:
The values and ranges specified in the right column of all tables in this chapter are taken
for 'typical' automotive applications. Its purpose is to give the user an idea in which
range the considered value lies. The application of data outside this range is additionally
checked by the GUI for physical reasonability.
The aftertreatment simulation can be performed either completely decoupled from any BOOST
cycle simulation or as an integrated part of a BOOST model as shown in the following figures.
Pipe Model
180
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The aftertreatment connection
visualizes the connection of aftertreatment elements (catalytic
converter or particulate filter) with aftertreatment boundary conditions. It does not feature
any specific data of its own. An arbitrary number of catalytic converters, particulate filters and
pipes can be linked with aftertreatment connections to aftertreatment boundary conditions. Using
these elements a complete aftertreatment analysis model is specified.
0 (s)
End Time
0-1800 (s)
181
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Time Step
0.5
60
Use
Enables the user to specify an external database
Thermodynamic
file for thermal gas properties. Please refer to the
Property Database BOOST Users Guide for a detailed description of
the expected input format.
page [181]
1 (-)
As shown in Fig. 54
, the gas composition consisting of gaseous species and solid
particles has to be specified. This is defined as global information since the gas flow links all
elements considered in the aftertreatment simulation and therefore the number and type of any
species has to be identical. The input of solid species is restricted to particulate filters since in the
case of catalyst simulations any solid flows through without any impact or interaction.
182
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The following species specifications are required:
Typical Values
Gas Composition
CO, CO2
O2, N2...
Solid Species
C(s)
When the Engine A/F Ratio input at the inlet Aftertreatment Boundary is chosen (cf. section
page [185]
Boundary Conditions
), the reference fuel used for calculating emissions from the given
Engine A/F Ratio needs to be specified by enabling Fuel Composition. In this case the following
input is required:
Typical Values
C
The specification of the Homogenous Gas Phase Reactions, which can be considered in pipes
page [181]
and catalysts, is shown in Fig. 54
. The list of chemistry models is either typed in (by
using the Insert/Remove options) or read in from an ASCII input file. For each chemistry model
an arbitrary key (string) is defined. In the BOOST model a specific chemistry model is referred
through this key.
Typical Values
Homogenous Gas
Phase Reactions:
Key
e.g.
CH4_autoignition
Homogenous Gas
Phase Reactions:
Chemistry
e.g.
CH4_ignit.txt
The Restart Control section allows a restart file to be written during a simulation and/or a
simulation to be restarted from an existing restart file:
Typical Values
Restart Simulation YES:
Choose this option in order to run a restart
simulation. This requires a valid restart file to be
available.
NO:
183
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
This is the standard mode for simulations.
Write Restart File
Tolerance
Specify a factor in order to refine the default solver 0.1-100
Refinement Factor tolerances. Values > 1 lead to smaller tolerances
(-)
(more strict solver iteration abort criteria), and
values < 1 lead to higher tolerances.
Disable Result
Writing
184
Parameter Key
Value
Description
ATM_AMEND_INPUT_TABLES
NO
ATM_RUNNING_AVERAGE
<# points>
ATM_PeriodicTimeSteps
YES
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Example
The following figure shows the input of optional parameters. This page allows to specify model
page [14]
parameters in a general way. As shown, two values (see Eq.29
) for the friction model of the
catalyst are specified. If no optional parameter is set, the simulation uses its default settings.
Figure 55. User Defined Parameters
Inlet Flow
Specification
Mass Flux
Volume Flow
Gas Mass/Mole
Fractions
Solid Mass
Fractions
300-1500 (K)
0 (kg/s)
depends on the
catalyst size
0-1 (kgs/kggas)
185
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
is required for the simulation of particulate filter
loading.
Engine A/F Ratio
If the Adiabatic backflow toggle switch is selected, only the outlet pressure is required:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Pressure
1-5 (bar)
If the Adiabatic backflow toggle switch is deselected (user-defined), the following data is
required in addition to Pressure:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Temperature
300-1500 (K)
Gas Mass/Mole
Fractions
Solid Mass
Fractions
0-1 (kgs/kggas)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Currently, this can be achieved by employing a user-defined parameter
ATM_RUNNING_AVERAGE. The parameter has several options to control the smoothing
procedure which are described in the following table.
Parameter Key
Value
Description
ATM_RUNNING_AVERAGE
<# points>
PASSES
<# passes>
FACTOR
<factor>
AMEND
NO
NO
<PRESSURE|TEMP|MFRAC|
SFRAC|INFLOW>
Example:
The User Defined Parameters table:
Parameter Key
Value
ATM_RUNNING_AVERAGE
40
PASSES
FACTOR
1.3371
MFRAC
NO
PRESSURE
NO
would apply a three-pass running average with window sizes of 40, 30, and 22 points to all input
tables, except for the species mass/mole fractions and the pressure tables, and amend the end
points afterwards.
Giving e.g. ATM_RUNNING_AVERAGE 20 as the only parameter would apply a one-pass
running average with an averaging window of 20 points.
5.1.3. Catalyst
The specification of the catalyst (
) comprises data of its geometry, its fluid and
thermodynamic behavior and the conversion reactions taking place. This input data is discussed
in the following sub-sections:
187
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.3.1. General
In order to simulate the chemical processes in the catalyst - either heterogeneous or
homogeneous reactions - the switch Chemical Reactions needs to be activated. As a
consequence the input pages to define the required input for the single-channel converter model
are activated as well.
If deactivated, no chemical reactions can be modeled and default values will be considered for
the numerical and physical properties for the single-channel converter model.
Furthermore the basic geometry has to be defined by the following data:
Typical Values
and Ranges
3
Monolith Volume
1-10 (dm )
Length of Monolith
0.1-0.5 (m)
Inlet Collector
Volume
1 (dm )
Outlet Collector
Volume
1 (dm )
Couple to upstream
element
Consider Air
Gap between the
Substrates
273-1000 (K)
188
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
2
100-900 (1/in )
Wall Thickness
0.006-0.015 (in)
0.50-0.75 (-)
Hydraulic
Diameter
(Hydraulic Area)
0.001-0.005 (m)
5.1.3.4. Friction
The friction of the catalytic converter model can either be specified by Target Pressure Drop or
by a friction Coefficient. If the catalyst is simulated in the aftertreatment analysis mode, only the
specification of a friction coefficient can be used. For a standard BOOST cycle simulation both
input variants can be used.
If Target Pressure Drop is selected, the following data is required:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Inlet Mass Flow
Inlet Temperature
300 (K)
Inlet Pressure
1 (bar)
Target Pressure
Drop
0.003 (bar)
For more detailed information about the input variant Pressure Drop refer to the BOOST Users
Guide.
If Coefficient is selected, the following input data is required:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Laminar
Coefficient a
64 (-)
Laminar
Coefficient b
-1 (-)
0.01-0.04 (-)
table value
(see typical values below). The
latter value is defined as a function of the monolith
length.
189
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Friction Multiplier
Channel Shape
5.1.3.5. Discretization
The required input of the discretization does not concern the physical situation of the catalyst, but
is required in order to setup and 'tune' its numerical model.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Model Dimension
1D/2D
Axial Direction
10-100 (-)
0.8 (-)
If a 2D simulation is chosen, the following data should be set in addition to the radial direction:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Radial Direction
Number of Channels:
2-7(-)
Determines the number of channels located in radial
direction
0.5 (-)
Grid Shape Factor:
Determines the allocation of the radial channels.
Values below 1 produce a grid along the radius
which is more dense toward the center and the shell
of the catalyst (according to a geometrical series),
whereas values greater than 1 yield a grid which is
more dense in the middle of the radius.
190
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Thermal
Conductivity
Specific Heat
Anisotropic
Corrects the diffusion coefficients of the solid
Conduction Factor temperature equation normal to axial direction. A
value of 1.0 simulates an isotropic conductivity. A
value of 0.5 would be a good choice for monoliths.
This value is only needed for 2D simulations.
0-10 (-)
Heat Transfer
Model
Sieder-Tate
(default)
Heat Transfer
Coefficient
5-500 (W/m2)
Heat Transfer
Multiplier
Mass Transfer
Model
Sieder-Tate
(default)
Mass Transfer
Coefficient
0.01-0.1 (kg/
(m2s))
Mass Transfer
Multiplier
Catalysts whose substrates are axially structured in a way that there is heat- and mass-transfer
between channels, can be modeled using the options from the Catalyst Segmentation section:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Repeat Turbulent
Inlet Region
Repeating Length
191
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
in the following figure. More detailed information on how the radial heat transfer is modeled
page [19]
can be found in Section Boundary Conditions
. In the second case, where the canning
and insulation can be modeled in detail by specifying individual wall layers, Variable Wall
Temperature needs to be enabled and the required input data can be provided on the related
sub-page. Detailed information on the multi-layered wall model can be found in sectionMultipage [65]
Layered Wall Model
.
Figure 56. Heat Loss - Specification of Radial Heat Transfer Conditions
192
Variable Wall
Temperature
External Heat
Transfer Coefficient
Thickness, Shell
0-5 (mm)
Thickness,
Insulation
0-30 (mm)
Thermal
Conductivity, Shell
10-100 (W/(mK))
Thermal
Conductivity,
Insulation
0.01-0.1 (W/(mK))
Environment
Temperature
298-350 (K)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.3.7.1. Variable Wall Temperature
Typical Values
and Ranges
Solid Material
Table
Solid Material
Layer Thickness
Ambient
Temperature
Radiation Sink
Temperature
Convection Model
Convection
Coefficient
Coolant
Characteristic
Determines the velocity of the coolant flowing
Velocity of Coolant around the outer wall layer. A cross-flow regime is
assumed.
Convection
Coefficient
0.1-30 (mm)
273-1000 (K)
0.1-30 (m/s)
5.1.3.8. Washcoat
At "Washcoat" the physical properties of the washcoat material, as well as the reaction
mechanism and mass transfer models are specified.
Two different approaches are available to model heterogeneous reactions in the catalyst's
washcoat:
In the Surface Reaction Model approach, the mass transfer, i.e. pore diffusion, through the
washcoat layer(s) is neglected. In the Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model approach, pore diffusion is
taken into account. Therefore, every washcoat layer is discretized in the direction perpendicular
to the catalyst solid surface, resulting in a 1D+1D simulation model. The Surface Reaction
Model approach is equivalent to the WCL Model approach with only one washcoat layer of one
computational cell.
193
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
A single Catalyst can consider either the Surface Reaction Model or the WCL Model; they cannot
be mixed.
Surface Reaction Model
The necessary input for the Surface Reaction Model is the thickness of the washcoat, as well
as the reaction mechanism describing the chemical behavior of the converter. The set-up of the
page [197]
Conversion Reactions is located in the first reaction branch My_Reaction
.
The input of Washcoat Layer Thickness can be done directly in the Catalyst component mask,
by selecting "Washcoat Layer Thickness" or it can be taken from an AUCI Catalytic Reaction
Mechanism. Details on making use of washcoat properties from custom models can be found in
page [221]
the related section Washcoat Properties from AUCI Custom Models
.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Washcoat Thickness
Washcoat Thickness
(direct GUI input)
>0-0.003 (m)
The washcoat thickness is used in the calculation of the hydraulic diameter in case of a "Square
Cell Catalyst" and the fraction of solid substrate in the overall converter volume in case of a
page [188]
"General Catalyst" (cf. Type Specification
).
Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model
In the WCL Model an arbitrary number of washcoat layers can be defined. This is done in the
related table of washcoat layers that is editable as soon as the WCL model has been selected.
For each washcoat layer a separate row is added to the table. The required input for the
simulation is done on related subnodes: For each washcoat layer the following subnodes are
created:
1. My_Layer page [195]: Specify the physical properties of the washcoat material and input
required for the numerical simulation model.
2. My_Reaction page [197]: Specify the reaction mechanism taking place in the related washcoat
layer.
3. My_Transport page [219]: Specify the pore diffusion model that describes the mass transfer
within the washcoat layer.
194
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Tip: The labels of these subnodes may be changed within the table listing all washcoat
layers; for example "My_Layer" at washcoat layer #1 could be renamed to "Top_Layer":
Simply double-click the related input field and enter a new label.
5.1.3.8.1. Washcoat Layer Specification
At "My_Layer" physical properties of the washcoat layer as well as numerical simulation model
input is given.
Below, the required input for single washcoat layer (WCL) is described. Some of the WCL
properties may either be typed-in directly at this input pages or an AUCI custom model may
be indicated as source. Details on this treatment are given in the related section Washcoat
page [221]
Properties from AUCI Custom Models
.
Dimension
For each washcoat layer its thickness needs to be indicated. Note that the washcoat layer
thickness needs to be greater than zero. The following input possibilities are available:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Washcoat Layer Thickness
Washcoat Layer
Thickness
(direct GUI input)
>0-0.003 (m)
From AUCI Catalytic Indicate that the thickness of the washcoat layer
Reaction Mechanism shall be taken from an AUCI custom kinetic
page [197]
model loaded at the related My_Reaction
subnode for this WCL. Additionally specify from
which custom model it shall be taken by typing its
row index in the User Defined Reactions table.
From AUCI Transfer
Model
Extruded Catalyst
195
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Reference for Chemistry Data
Optionally, reference data can be provided to specify the ratio of washcoat layer volume to
converter volume of the particular catalyst for which the kinetic parameters have been calibrated.
page [23]
More details on this topic can be found in the related section Reference for Chemistry Data
.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Specify a Reference
WCL Volume
>0-0.01 (-)
Discretization
The following input is required for the computational model.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Number of Grid
Points
1-10 (-)
400-2000 (kg/m )
From AUCI Catalytic Indicate that the bulk density of the washcoat
Reaction Mechanism layer material shall be taken from an AUCI
custom kinetic model loaded at the related
page [197]
My_Reaction
subnode for this WCL.
Additionally specify from which custom model it
shall be taken by typing its row index in the User
Defined Reactions table.
Washcoat Porosity
WCL Porosity
(direct GUI input)
From AUCI Catalytic Indicate that the porosity of the washcoat layer
Reaction Mechanism material shall be taken from an AUCI custom
kinetic model loaded at the related My_Reaction
page [197]
subnode for this WCL. Additionally
specify from which custom model it shall be
taken by typing its row index in the User Defined
Reactions table.
From AUCI Transfer
Model
196
0-1 (-)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.3.8.2. Reaction Model (Conversion Reactions)
At "My_Reaction" several different reaction models are available. Either no reactions are taken
into account, pre-defined or custom kinetic models are chosen or the application of map based
conversion is possible.
Pre-Defined Kinetic Models
The pre-defined reaction models use global kinetic approaches given by Langmuir Hinshelwood
equations and also transient mechanisms where adsorption and desorption steps are explicitly
taken into account. All reaction models are supplied with default values for the individual kinetic
parameters. The user can use the kinetic model and adjust all kinetic parameters.
Note: The suggested reaction parameters have been successfully applied to several
validation simulations, but they may have to be adjusted for use in other types of
catalysts. In this case it is recommended to apply the pre-defined reaction model and to
supply it with adequate reaction parameters.
The following pre-defined reaction models are available:
Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC)
This model is dedicated for DOCs comprising the three major oxidation reactions of CO, HC
and NO.
Three Way Catalyst (TWC)
This model is a dedicated TWC model comprising seven conversion reactions and surface
storage reactions on cerium, rhodium and barium. By selecting specific reactions and
adapting the related kinetic parameters, this model also can be applied to other catalysts
such as DOCs.
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), Steady Kinetics
This model comprises seven reaction rates which can be enabled/disabled individually
for three different reaction sections in the catalyst. The SCR rates use Eley-Rideal
mechanisms, thus it assumes steady-state conditions for the reaction steps of adsorption,
catalytic reaction and desorption.
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), Transient Kinetics
This model comprises nine reactions that can be enabled/disabled individually for three
different reaction sections in the catalyst. The transient effect of ad-/desorption is explicitly
taken into account.
Lean NOx Trap
This model comprises ten conversion reactions and surface storage on cerium.
Furthermore, it offers two approaches of storing nitric oxides: an ash core model approach,
developed by ICVT Stuttgart, and a surface storage approach.
Detailed information about the individual reaction mechanisms is given in section Kinetic Models
page [77]
.
Custom Kinetic Models
In addition to providing the above pre-defined reaction mechanism custom kinetic models can be
simulated as well. For that two interfaces are available:
User Defined Reactions (Without Archive)
Here, a custom kinetic model programmed in the FORTRAN file mod_userdef_cat.f90
can be activated. For details on using this approach of custom kinetic models contact the
BOOST Support.
Restriction: This type of custom kinetic model cannot be combined with any other
kinetic model in the same surface or washcoat layer model.
Note: This type of custom kinetic model is deprecated. It is recommended to use
"User Defined Reactions" and AUCI for designing custom models.
197
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
User Defined Reactions
Using this option custom kinetic models designed in AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechanism
can be activated. Details in AUCI can be found in the related documentation.
This type of custom kinetic model can be combined with the pre-defined models in the same
surface or washcoat layer model.
Map Based Conversion
As an alternative to kinetic models in the catalyst, its conversion can also be modeled by
providing maps that comprise the species conversion as a function of different parameters (e.g.
temperature, space velocity), that are to be detailed at the related sub-page.
In addition to these conversion maps it is also possible to use control elements to define
conversion dependencies and to actuate a species' conversion.
Restriction: None of the kinetic models can be combined with Map Based Conversion.
Further input
Typical Values
and Ranges
Effective Catalyst
Loading
Tolerate Undefined
Species
198
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Attention: If species required by
the stoichiometry as products are
being omitted, mass conservation is
broken and simulation results may be
considered with care.
R3: NO Oxidation
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
199
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Approach 2
200
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R4: H2 Oxidation
R5: NO Oxidation
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
201
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The reaction constant is evaluated using Arrhenius' law. The
equilibrium constant is also a function of the temperature and is
derived from the free Gibbs reaction enthalpy.
Approach 1
Approach 2
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
202
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
E1 - E5
R10-R13: Ce Storage
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
R11
203
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R12
R13
R14-R19: Rh Storage
Cerium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
CeO2
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
CeO2
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
R15
R16
R17
R18
204
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R19
R20-R21: Ba Storage
Rhodium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
RhO
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
RhO
K1 - K6
E1 - E6
R21
Barium
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
Max
Surface
Coverage
205
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
Metal
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
C3H6
Max
Surface
Coverage
fraction of
C3H6
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined sorption-equilibrium and ad/desorption
mechanisms.
E1 - E2
R22: HC Storage
206
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The different reactions can be enabled/disabled individually by clicking the corresponding check
boxes. This enables sub-pages for the detailed specification of the reaction parameters.
R1: HNCO Hydrolysis
R2: NO Reduction
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
207
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R7: NO Oxidation
K1 - K2
Determine the frequency factors used in the predefined Eley-Rideal conversion mechanism.
E1 - E2
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power law mechanism.
Approach 2
208
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
A
The different reactions can be en/disabled individually by clicking the corresponding check
boxes. This enables sub-pages for the detailed specification of the reaction parameters.
R1: HNCO Hydrolysis
Determines the frequency factors used in the predefined power law mechanism.
R3
209
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
NH3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
Coverage
Determines a surface coverage dependency in the
Dependency pre-defined ad/desorption mechanisms.
(epsilon)
Max
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
NH3
Determines the order of NH3 surface coverage
Surface
fraction in the adsorption rate formulation.
Coverage
Range: 0-2 (-)
Fraction
Dependency
m
R4: NO Reduction
210
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R9: NO Oxidation
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
Critical
Surface
Coverage)
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient oxidation mechanism.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law oxidation mechanism.
211
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Approach 2
E1
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law conversion mechanism.
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Reaction
Order m
K1 - K4
R2: CO Oxidation
212
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
E1 - E4
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene, nitric
Orders m, n, oxide and oxygen in the pre-defined Langmuirp
Hinshelwood conversion mechanism.
R3: C3H6 Oxidation
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of oxygen and nitric
Orders m, n oxide in the pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood
conversion mechanism.
R4: NO Oxidation
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Kinetic
Determines a kinetic coefficient used in the
Coefficient f pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood conversion
mechanism.
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene, nitric
Orders m, n, oxide and oxygen in the pre-defined Langmuirp
Hinshelwood conversion mechanism.
R5: NO Reduction H2
K1
E1
213
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R6: NO Reduction CO
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of propene and nitric
Orders m, n oxide in the pre-defined Langmuir-Hinshelwood
conversion mechanism.
R7: NO Reduction
C3H6
K1
E1
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
214
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Reaction
Order m
K1 - K4
E1 - E4
Ce Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
CeO2
K1 - K2
E1 - E2
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of oxygen stored on
Orders m, n, the surface and oxygen ratio at the surface in the
p, q
pre-defined ad/desorption mechanism.
R12-R16: Surface
Storage on Barium
Carbonate
R12
R13
R14
R15
215
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R16
BaCO3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
Ba(NO3)2
Rate
approach 1
Rate
approach 2
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
Reaction
Determines the reaction order of Ba(NO3)2 in the
Orders m, n, pre-defined ad/desorption mechanism of Rate
p, q, r
approach 2.
R12-R16: Ash Core
Model
R13
R14
216
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
R15
R16
Particle
Radius
Min
Specific
Surface
Max
Specific
Surface
Pore
Diffusion
Coefficient
Scaling
The LNT model assumes that NOx desorption
Factor
(regeneration) takes place faster than NOx
During
adsorption (storage). This factor increases the pore
Regeneration diffusion coefficient during regeneration.
Typical Value: 10 (-)
5.1.3.8.2.6. User Defined Reactions (Without Archive)
This is an interface to load a custom kinetic from a custom kernel.
User-defined reaction mechanisms can be set by linking a user-routine. In this case the user can
supply his user-routine with parameters set in the GUI.
The two columns are:
The left column is designated for comments (BOOST interprets each entry as character)
The right column is used to specify input values (integer, double and character). It is the
user's responsibility to interpret these values in the correct way in his user-routine.
5.1.3.8.2.7. User Defined Reactions
This is an interface to load custom kinetic models developed using the AVL User Coding
Interface (AUCI).
Loading and maintaining an AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechanism
In general an arbitrary number of AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechanism models can be loaded. In
order to add or delete an AUCI model click Insert and Remove repsectively next to the table.
An AUCI model ("Archive") is stored in an ucp and uca file respectively, and the existing predefined kinetic models are available as ucp files in the installation.
An already loaded Archive can be enabled or disabled in the simulation by selecting Yes and
No respectively in the first column of the table.
The buttons below the table provide the following functions:
217
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Button
Description
Select Archive
Reload Archive
Reload the Archive from the selected row. In order to reset the
Model Parameters with the default values from the AUCI model
click "No" in the pop-up box "Keep current parameter values?".
Edit Archive
Model Parameters
Conversion
218
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Conversion
Dependency
Conversion Table
Conversion Map
page [21]
).
Note:
For specification of the transport model the Washcoat Layer (WCL) Model must be
active.
The transport model has to be specified for each washcoat layer separately. The following
models are available:
5.1.3.8.3.1. Constant Pore Diffusion
For this model constant diffusion coefficients are applied.
If Constant Pore Diffusion is selected, the following input data has to be specified:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Diffusion
Coefficients
10
-14
-5
-10 (m /s)
219
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.3.8.3.2. Effective Pore Diffusion
The effective diffusion coefficient is calculated with the free gas flow diffusion coefficient adapted
with the washcoat layer porosity and tortuosity. A scaling factor allows linear variation of the
calculated value for every species.
If Effective Pore Diffusion is selected, the following input data has to be specified:
Typical Values
and Ranges
Tortuosity
Diffusion Scaling
Factors
wcl
of the washcoat
1-5 (-)
0-100 (-)
0-1 (-)
Micropore Porosity
0-1 (-)
Macropore Diameter
10 -10 (m)
Micropore Diameter
10 -10 (m)
Diffusion Scaling
Factors
0-100 (-)
-8
-4
-9
-5
220
Tortuosity
Pore Diameter
wcl
of the washcoat
1-5 (-)
-9
-3
10 -10 (m)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Diffusion Scaling
Factors
0-100 (-)
The washcoat property in the above example the washcoat layer thickness can be either:
1. typed in directly in the BOOST GUI,
2. loaded from the indicated AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechanism,
3. loaded from an AUCI Transfer Model.
In the latter two cases only AUCI models loaded in the same washcoat layer can be referred to.
In the below example, the second option, i.e. From AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechanism has
been chosen as source for the washcoat layer thickness and the index of the AUCI model is 1:
Figure 58. Example: Washcoat Layer Thickness Value loaded from an AUCI Catalytic Reaction Mechan
Hence, the custom kinetic model number 1 at the related subnode My_Reaction
to be considered:
page [197]
is going
221
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Note: Only if washcoat properties are provided with the AUCI Catalytic Reaction
Mechanism the input will actually be taken from the custom model. Detailed information
on how to specify washcoat properties in AUCI can be found in the related AVL User
Coding Interface documentation.
In the next example, the washcoat layer thickness is taken From AUCI Transfer Model:
Figure 59. Example: Washcoat Layer Thickness Value loaded from an AUCI Transfer Model (Pore Diffu
page [219]
This requires that the Transport Model at the related subnode My_Transport
is set to User
Defined Pore Diffusion and that an AUCI model comprising a pore diffusion model is loaded:
222
Simulation
Submodel
Required Washcoat
Property
Surface Reaction
Model
Washcoat Layer
Model
Flow
WCL Thickness
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
Solid Enthalpy
Balance
Washcoat Property
not required
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
Species Balance in
the Reaction Layer
Washcoat Property
not required
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
Transport Model in
the WCL
WCL Porosity
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Simulation
Submodel
Required Washcoat
Property
Surface Reaction
Model
Washcoat Layer
Model
Reaction Rate
Evaluation (**)
As indicated in
BOOST GUI.(*)
(*): This can be the BOOST GUI input or the value included in the indicated AUCI model.
(**): Affects the conversion from unit group "Washcoat Mass Based" only.
5.1.3.9. Homogenous Gas Phase Reactions
Within a catalyst homogenous gas phase reactions can be taken into account. If activated, a
chemistry set has to be referred through its key.
5.1.3.10. Result Specification
Typical Values
and Ranges
Spatial Position
Axial Output
Points
5-30 (-)
Radial Output
Points
5-30 (-)
User Defined
Axial, Radial
Type of Results
223
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The standard set of results is extended
by properties such as heat capacities,
conductivities, transfer coefficients.
Standard, Fluxes:
The standard set of results is extended by
mass and heat fluxes.
Standard, Sources:
The standard set of results is extended by
sources from the individual chemical reactions.
All:
All results, the standard set, properties, fluxes
and sources are written.
General information on how to use the BOOST post-processor and how to graphically display all
the simulation results is available in the BOOST Users Guide and the GUI Users Guide.
100-900 (1/in )
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Wall thickness
0.006-0.015 (in)
Enable
Enables the calculation for asymmetrical channel
Asymmetrical
diameters.
Channel Diameters
Off (default)
Ratio of Channel
Diameters
1-1.4 (-)
0.5-0.75 (-)
Hydraulic
diameter
5.1.4.2.1.3. Hexahex
Click on Hexahex to obtain the following parameter specification.
Typical Values
and Ranges
2
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
200-500 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (in)
0.666 (-)
(default)
Perimeter
Efficiency (a)
0.0-1.0 (-)
5.1.4.2.1.4. Hex3
Click on Hex3 to obtain the following parameter specification.
Typical Values
and Ranges
2
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
200-500 (1/in )
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (in)
225
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Inlet Channel Side
Ratio (a/b)
Perimeter
Efficiency (a)
0.0-1.0 (-)
Nr of Inlet
Determines the number of inlet channels per unity
Channels per Unity cell.
Cell
1-3 (-)
Nr of Outlet
Determines the number of outlet channels per unity
Channels per Unity cell.
Cell
1 (-)
Nr of GSEs per
Inlet Channel
1-12 (-)
Wall thickness
0.004-0.015 (-)
Center Corner
Determines the sum of the angles
Angle (alpha+beta) general symmetry element.
226
Cell density (CPSI) Determines the total number of inlet and outlet
2
channels per in .
and
of the
45-90 (deg)
Right Corner
Angle (gamma)
of the GSE.
45-90 (deg)
of the GSE.
45-90 (deg)
0.1-1 (mm)
0.1-1 (mm)
Filtration
Efficiency at l1
0-1 (-)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Filtration
Efficiency at l2
Channel Shape
Factor
Outlet Channel
Perimeter
Outlet Channel
Cross Section
0.5-1 (-)
0.5-5 (mm )
Layer Packing
Density
5-30 (kg/m )
Migration
Constant
1E-15-1E-5 (-)
Wall Permeability
1E-15-1E-12 (m )
Soot Permeability
1E-16-1E-13 (m )
227
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Map (dependent on both, temperature and wall
velocity)
Formula (see. Soot Permeability page [50])
Enable Depth
Filtration
Off (default)
Sublayer
Thickness
10-100 (micron)
Depth Filtration
Threshold
0-3 (g/l)
Depth Filtration
Permeability
1E-16-1E-13 (m )
Inlet Loss
Coefficient
0.5-10 (-)
Outlet Loss
Coefficient
0.5-10 (-)
Consider Inlet/
Outlet Plugs
Off (default)
Length of PF Inlet- Determines the length of the inlet and outlet plugs.
Outlet Plugs
0-20 (mm)
0-1 (-)
Soot Mass
5-30 (kg/m )
Max. fraction
going to depth
layer
0-1(-)
Off (default)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
3
Ash Packing
Density
100-500 (kg/m )
Ash Permeability
1E-15-1E-13 (m )
Off (default)
Ash Layer/Plug
Determines the ratio of ash that is stored in the
Distribution Factor ash layer to ash stored in the ash plug. A factor of
1 means all the ash is stored in the layer. A factor
of 0 means all the ash is stored in the ash plug. If
the ash loading is not specified as constant value
but as function of the filter length, the shape of the
axial profile is kept but scaled down by the ashdistribution factor.
(0-1) (-)
Ash Mass
0-100 (g/l)
On /Off
-6
-5
O2-thermal
page
229
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
O2-fuel-additive
O2-NO2
O2-NO2-NO2catalytic
User Defined
PF Zone Coating
Table
CO-HC-NOConversion
Selective
Catalytic
Reduction
User Defined
Fraction of
Catalytic Wall
Height
0-1 (-)
On/Off
Note:
The activation of Regeneration Mode Sublayer is only possible if depth filtration is
activated (Enable Depth Filtration at Soot and Filter Properties).
230
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.4.5.1. Soot Regeneration Mode
O2 - Thermal
O2 - Fuel Additive
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
231
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
can choose the table option to specify individual
values for each coating section.
Ef
O2 - NO2
O2
K1
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E1
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
NO2
232
K3
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E3
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
O2 - NO2-NO2-Catalytic O2
K1
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E1
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
kf
qf
Ef
NO2
K3-K4
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E3-E4
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
NO2- Catalytic
K5
Determines a frequency factor used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
233
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
E5
Determines an activation energy used in the predefined regeneration mechanism (see Section
page [92]
Filter CSF Catalytic Reactions
). In the
catalytic sublayer the user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
234
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
K1 - K5
E1 - E5
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
mechanism (see Section Filter CSF Catalytic
page [92]
Reactions
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
R4: NO Oxidation
NH3
Storage
Capacity
Initial
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
Coverage
Determines a surface coverage dependency in
Dependency the pre-defined ad-/desorption mechanisms (see
(epsilon)
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Typical Values & Ranges: 0-1[-]
Max
Surface
Coverage
Fraction of
NH3
NH3
Surface
Coverage
Fraction
Dependency
m
K1 - K2
Determine frequency factors used in the predefined ad/desorption mechanisms (see Section
HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient Approach
235
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
page [83]
R3: NO Reduction
236
E1 - E2
Critical
Surface
Coverage
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Critical
Surface
Coverage
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Critical
Surface
Coverage
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined transient conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law oxidation mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
R8: NO Oxidation
Rate Approach 1
K
237
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The user can choose the table option to specify
individual values for each coating section.
A
Rate Approach 2
K, KR
E, ER
A, AR
Determines the frequency factor used in the predefined power-law conversion mechanism (see
Section HSO-SCR Catalyst Reactions, Transient
page [83]
Approach
). The user can choose the table
option to specify individual values for each coating
section.
238
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.4.6. Chemical Reactions with Archive
The user has the possibility to specify an arbitrary number of different particulate filter coating
zones with specific dimensionless zone lengths. For each inserted Zone Soot Regeneration and
Catalytic Gas Reaction mechanisms, developed by using the AVL User Coding Interface, have to
be applied separately.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Zone Name
Zone_1 (default)
Zone length
0-1(-)
Regeneration
My_Regeneration1
(default)
Catalytic Gas
Reactions
My_Cat_Reaction1
(default)
239
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
reaction mechanism in the first place, the AVL User Coding Interface can be launched by clicking
the button Edit Archive.
Wall Reactions
Enable Wall Reactions
On /Off
Catalytic Wall
Fraction
0-1 (-)
On/Off
Mass Transfer
Scaling Factor
On/Off
Mass Transfer
Scaling Factor
On/Off
User Coding
Mass Transfer
Model
Empty (default)
Effective Catalyst
Loading
240
Pipe Length
10-3000 (mm)
Number of Grid
points
5-50 (-)
Diameter
10-300 (mm)
Bend Pipe
Bending Radius
0.3-10000 (m)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Laminar Friction
Coeff
Turbulent Friction
Friction
Coefficient
Surface
Roughness
Friction Multiplyer
Gas-Wall Heat
Transfer
Heat Transfer
Coefficient
Heat Transfer
Factor
0.1-10 (-)
Wall Temperature
273-1000 (K)
Variable Wall
Temperature
Chemistry
Couple to
upstream element
0.019 (-)
0.1-10 (-)
Solid Material
241
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
represents the innermost wall layer and the last line
the outermost wall layer.
Layer Thickness
Ambient
Temperature
Radiation Sink
Temperature
Convection Model
Convection
Coefficient
Coolant
Characteristic
Determines the velocity of the coolant flowing
Velocity of Coolant around the pipe. A cross-flow regime is assumed.
Convection
Coefficient
0.1-30 (mm)
273-1000 (K)
0.1-30(m/s)
2
242
Axial Output
Points
5-30 (-)
Radial Output
Points
5-30 (-)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
results are given on a mesh of (Axial Output Points
x Radial Output Points).
User Defined
Axial, Radial
The Type of Results of all the transient results can be specified by the user as follows.
Reduced:
A reduced set of mean and outlet values is written.
Standard:
A standard set of results (temperatures, pressures, conversions, ) is written.
Standard, Properties:
The standard set of results is extended by properties such as heat capacities, conductivities,
transfer coefficients.
Standard, Fluxes:
The standard set of results is extended by mass and heat fluxes.
Standard, Sources:
The standard set of results is extended by sources from the individual chemical reactions.
All:
All results, the standard set, properties, fluxes and sources are written.
General information on how to use the BOOST post-processor and how to graphically display
all the simulation results is available in the BOOST Users Guide and the IMPRESS Chart Users
Guide.
Injection
Temperature
Injected fluid
specification
Choose between
1. to Gas Phase only (instantaneous
decomp./evap)
243
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
2. to Liquid Phase only
3. partition among Gas/Liquid Phases
Choosing cases 2 and 3 invokes a Liquid Phase.
For case 3, the Fraction of Injected Fluid to Gas
Phase may be chosen. This determines the part
of the total injected mass going to the Gas Phase,
while the rest of the mass goes to the Liquid Phase.
Liquid Phase
Choose between
4. Droplets only
5. Wallfilm only
6. partition among Droplets/Wallfilm
Choosing cases 5 and 6 enables the Wallfilm.
For case 6, the Fraction of Liquid Phase to
Wallfilm may be entered. This determines the
portion of the liquid phase mass that goes to the
Wallfilm; the rest of the mass is transported as
a separate droplet phase (see Liquid Species
page [75]
Transport
).
Partitioning
summary
The decisions how to partition the injected mass are done via the radio buttons 1-6. Radio
buttons 1-3 decide the first level (gas vs. liquid phase), while buttons 4-6 decide the second level
(wallfilm vs. droplets).
5.1.6.2. Gaseous Injected Fluid
Specify the composition of the gaseous injected fluid. Select the species fraction unit from the
pull-down menu Unit of Species; possible options are 'Mass Fraction (kg/kg)' and 'Mole Fraction
(mol/mol)'. Add/remove species with Insert/Remove. Click on a Species input field to open a list
of possible species that have been specified previously in Simulation | Control | Aftertreatment
Analysis in the Gas Composition table.
Enter a mass fraction; possible values are 0-1 (-). The total sum of mass fractions has to be 1,
the font color will be red when this criterion is not fulfilled; it can be corrected by choosing a row
and clicking Correct; the correction will be applied to the selected row. Load and store tables by
clicking the corresponding buttons.
244
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.6.3. Liquid Injected Fluid
Specify the composition of the liquid injected fluid. Add/remove liquids with Insert
Liquid/Remove Liquid. Click on a Liquid input field to open a list of possible liquids that have
been specified beforehand in Model | Liquid Materials.
Enter a mass fraction; possible values are 0-1 (-).
Note: The total sum of mass fractions has to be 1.
For each of the liquids in the table, a new sub page [n] Composition of <liquid> is available. On
each of these pages, there are two input tables in which you may enter:
1. the gas species the liquid is mapped to upon decomposition/evaporation (e.g. WATER may
evaporate to H2O, or UREA may decompose into HNCO and NH3).
2. possible liquid sub-species the liquid may consist of (e.g. ADBLUE may be mapped onto the
liquid species UREA and WATER)
page [243]
The tables are active (and need input) depending on the settings done on the General
page. Table 1 is inactive when radio button 4 is selected, Table 2 is inactive when radio button 1
is selected.
5.1.6.3.1. Composition of Injected Liquid
For each specified liquid at the Liquid Injected Fluid Window a 'Composition of Injected Liquid'
page will be enabled. Here, specify the stoichiometric composition of the liquid, i.e. onto which
gas species the liquid will be mapped.
The procedure works the same as for the 'Gaseous Injected Fluid'. The only difference is that
mass fractions can be negative too, which refers to consumption of a certain gas species; still,
the total sum of mass fractions has to be 1.
Below that table, some examples of how to map a liquid onto gas species are displayed.
5.1.6.4. Wallfilm Modeling
This is activated if Liquid is specified as the injected fluid. Select Enable Wallfilm Modeling to
access the options.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Wallfilm
Thickness
Fraction of Liquid
to Wallfilm
Evaporation Rate
Multiplier
245
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Typical Values
and Ranges
Axial Output
Points
5-30 (-)
Radial Output
Points
User Defined
Axial, Radial
The Type of Results of all the transient results can be specified by the user as follows.
Reduced:
A reduced set of mean and outlet values is written.
Standard:
A standard set of results (temperatures, pressures, conversions, ) is written.
Standard, Properties:
The standard set of results is extended by properties such as heat capacities, conductivities,
transfer coefficients.
Standard, Fluxes:
The standard set of results is extended by mass and heat fluxes.
Standard, Sources:
The standard set of results is extended by sources from the individual chemical reactions.
All:
All results, the standard set, properties, fluxes and sources are written.
General information on how to use the BOOST post-processor and how to graphically display
all the simulation results is available in the BOOST Users Guide and the IMPRESS Chart Users
Guide.
246
Length
5-100 (mm)
Diameter
0.1-1 (mm)
Number of grid
points
5-50 (-)
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Heat Radiation
Sampling Rate
273-1000 (K)
1 - 1000 (Hz)
Sensor Channels
Variable
Element
Sensor Channel
Output Channels
Tip: For every sensor channel in the Temperature Sensor element a corresponding
output channel will be generated that can be sensed by another Control Element, for
example when considering the Temperature Sensor in a control unit.
5.1.7.2. Formula Interpreter
The Formula Interpreter Element (
) can be used to
1. sense values (i.e. maximum temperatures, conversion rates, ) from different components
(Catalyst, Particulate Filter, Pipe, Aftertreatment Injector)
2. perform calculations with these values (C-code that is interpreted by BOOST and executed
after each calculation step (the time step is taken from the input field 'Result Output Interval'
on the page the Global | Aftertreatment Analysis)
3. actuate values (mass flow, temperature, ) at different components (Aftertreatment
Boundary)
For a detailed description on how to handle the Formula Interpreter Element please refer to
section 4.16.6 of the BOOST Users Guide.
BOOST Aftertreatment offers the following pre-defined function to be used in the Formula
Interpreter:
bst_terminate_atm() is terminating the current simulation run.
247
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Figure 60. Formula Interpreter - Formula Specification
) please refer to
) please refer to
5.1.7.5. Monitor
The Monitor Element ( ) can be used to sense values (i.e. maximum temperatures, conversion
rates, ) from different components (Catalyst, Particulate Filter, Pipe, Formula Interpreter). The
monitored values are shown in the Online Monitor (accessed from the Simulation Status dialog,
Monitor button) and in an individual section of the results-tree in IMPRESS Chart.
For a detailed description on how to handle the Monitor Element please refer to section 4.16.7 of
the BOOST Users Guide.
Figure 61. Monitor - Sensor Specification
248
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
5.1.8. Solid Materials
An arbitrary list of solid materials can be specified on the input page 'Solid Material'. The page
can be accessed from the pull-down menu item 'Model'. By right-clicking on the entry 'Material' in
the tree at the left side of the page, new material pages can be added. Currently the properties of
steel and air are supplied with default values.
Typical Values
and Ranges
Material Name
Density
1-6000 (kg/m )
Thermal
Conductivity
0.01-50 (W/(mK))
Specific Heat
500-2000 (J/
(kgK))
Opaque
Emissivity inner
0-1 (-)
Emissivity outer
0-1 (-)
Molar Weight
Liquid Density
Specific Heat
Thermal
Conductivity
249
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Heat of
Evaporation
Vapor Pressure
REACTIONS
2O+M<=>O2+M
1.200E+17
-1.000
.00
H2/2.40/ H2O/15.40/ CH4/2.00/ CO/1.75/ CO2/3.60/ C2H6/3.00/
AR/ .83/
O+H+M<=>OH+M
5.000E+17
-1.000
.00
H2/2.00/ H2O/6.00/ CH4/2.00/ CO/1.50/ CO2/2.00/ C2H6/3.00/ AR/ .70/
O+H2<=>H+OH
3.870E+04
2.700
6260.00
END
The chemistry interpreter reads this input file during the preprocessing and creates an Info file
('input_file_name'_out.dat in the input file directory) with the specified chemistry.
Currently about 95% of the auxiliary-keywords known by the CHEMKIN-II Version 4.9, April 1994,
DOUBLE PRECISION are considered by the interpreter. Therefore it is capable of reading and
interpreting the corresponding chem.inp files.
CAT/PF
Inlet/Outlet
Conditions
Gas Composition
Solid Species
Inlet Gas
Temperature
Inlet Gas Fractions Determines the mass (or mole) fractions of all the gas
species defined
Inlet Solid Mass
Fractions
250
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
CAT/PF
Monolith
Geometry
CAT/PF
Friction
CAT/PF
Solid
Properties
CAT/PF
Radial
Heat Loss
Conditions
Outlet Pressure
Monolith Volume
Monolith Length
Wall thickness
Washcoat
thickness
Density
Thermal
Conductivity
Specific Heat
External
Heat Transfer
Coefficient
Thickness, Shell,
Insulation Mat
Thermal
Determines the thermal conductivity of the shell
Conductivity, Shell,
Insulation Mat
CAT
Reactions
PF
Physical
Properties
Environment
Temperature
Conversion
Reactions
Determines the application of conversion model. Predefined reaction models can be chosen and adapted.
Surface Storage
Density, Soot
Soot Permeability
Soot Mass
251
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
PF
Reactions
Regeneration
Modes
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
front and/or when the reaction mechanism also contains surface storage reactions which
lead to higher transience in the conversion behavior it is good to increase the number of grid
points and choose a grid shape factor smaller 1.0 (for example 0.8).
The presented pre-defined reaction mechanisms with their default parametrization have
been validated for specific washcoats as presented in the mentioned references.
Particulate Filter (PF)
If the PF element is used as a simple pressure drop element only the number of grid points
that typically leads to stable simulation is around 20-25. As soon as kinetics is enabled in the
PF the number of grid points should be increased and experience shows that 50 is a good
value. A larger number than 80 is known to be unsuitable due to very high computational
effort and increasing instability resulting in multi-component systems from inhomogenous
axial discretization lengths leading to an ill conditioned Jacobian matrix.
A grid shape factor of 1.0 has been experienced as to give the most stable solution.
5.1.12.2. Aftertreatment Solver Settings
There are several possibilities to influence the solver performance. The below section
summarizes recommendations how some solver characteristics can be set in order to decrease
simulation time and increase stability.
General Remarks
The smaller the time step the slower the simulation due to more post-processing calls (i.e.
calculation and storage of results), whereas a larger time step can lead to instabilities,
especially when
a. the kinetics is very stiff,
b. highly transient inlet conditions challenge the PF flow solver.
For very stiff problems the solver option Enable High-Robustness Option at Simulation |
Control | Aftertreatment Analysis might lead to more stability. The main problems targeted
with that option are
a. Freezing: the solver seems to do nothing, but actually the solver is using very small
time steps, that are far below the provided User time step (Simulation | Control |
Aftertreatment Analysis) or DLL time step (set in external application SimuLink, NI
Veristand, ...),
b. Convergence Failure: the solver diverged, for example due to very stiff system.
Note: An ill-conditioned Jacobian cannot be solved easier using the HighRobustness option.
c. The applied solver tolerances of the BOOST Aftertreatment solution variables
(temperature, pressure, species concentrations) have been chosen with high care. If for
whatsoever reason the tolerances need to be adjusted, this can be done at Simulation
| Control | Aftertreatment Analysis | Solver Options. The pre-defined tolerances
are divided by the entered value; therefore values smaller 1.0 lead to more loose
tolerances, whereas values larger 1.0 lead to stricter tolerances.
User Defined Parameter
The below table summarizes User Defined Parameters that allow additionally to the GUI input
to influence the solver configuration and adjust other component parameter. The User Defined
Parameters are grouped by component.
Parameter Key
Value
Description
ATM Solver
ATM_DISABLE_NAN_CHECK YES / NO
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Parameter Key
Value
Description
save computation time this
check might be disabled.
ATM_SET_NR_FAILSKIP
number
ATM_SOLVER_DFLT_OPT
ON / OFF
ATM_DLL_SOLVER_OSETTINGS
YES / NO
ATM_CONG_TOLFACTOR*<Index>
>1.0: stricter
<1.0: looser
ATM_UPDATE_THERMDAT
FCN / TIMELOOP
ATM_UPDATE_TRANDAT
FCN / TIMELOOP
ATM_UPDATE_DIMLESS_NUMBERS
FCN / TIMELOOP
254
Update dimensionless
numbers (i.e. Re, Pr, Nu, )
in each solver time step or in
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Parameter Key
Value
Description
User defined time step only. In
order to gain speed-up choose
TIMELOOP.
ATM_MIMIC_DLLMODE
mode
Note: As the
DLL application is
emulated only with
respect to solver
settings, boundary
conditions and/
or actuation of
any parts of the
model need to be
defined within the
BOOST model
via Aftertreatment
Boundary and with
help for example
of the Formula
Interpreter element.
ATM_SOLVER_MAX_STEPSIZEtimestep
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Parameter Key
Value
Description
value. The time step to
be taken by the solver is
estimated internally in two
different steps. In the first
one the maximum possible
time step is determined by
analyzing the event horizon,
in the second one the current
time step is set based on
the history of integration and
limited by the maximum solver
time step. The maximum
solver time step is in general
variable in pure simulations
and shouldnt be adjusted
if not for strong reasons. In
case of DLL applications the
maximum time step cannot
be estimated due to missing
information about the event
horizon. Therefore it might
be helpful in such cases to
limitate the maximum solver
time step.
Catalyst
ATM_CAT_HOMREAC_ENERSPLIT
0.0 <= x <= 1.0
When simulating
homogeneous gas phase
reactions in the catalyst solver
stability is increased by adding
a certain fraction x of enthalpy
rate to the solid phase.
Particulate Filter
ATM_DPF_REFINE_FLOW_SOLUTION
>1.0: stricter
<1.0: looser
ATM_DPF_NR_DEPOS_SUBSTEPS
number
ATM_DPF_MOMENTUM_CORR_FAC
0.0 <= factor <= 1.0
Aftertreatment Pipe
ATM_PIP_GRIDSHAPE*<Index>value
256
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Parameter Key
Value
Description
shape factor in Catalyst
element for reference.
ATM_PIPE_SET_ITERATIONS number
Aftertreatment Injector
ATM_INJ_NRDIFFCELLS*<Index>
number
ATM_INJ_NRINJCELLS*<Index>number
ATM_INJ_PIPELENGTH*<Index>
length
ATM_INJ_COPYDSPIPE*<Index>
YES / NO
Aftertreatment Boundary
ATM_REFINED_BND
number
ATM_SOAK_DETECTORLIMIT value
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Parameter Key
Value
Description
it is possible to run arbitrary
BOOST Aftertreatment models
in CRUISE.
Submenu
Unit
Description
Pressure
Pa
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Temperature
Massflow
kg/s
Engine Lambda
Gas Species
Fraction
Unit
Description
Lambda ICVT
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Pressure
Pa
Temperature
Massflow
kg/s
Gas Species
Fraction
258
Submenu
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Solid Species Fraction <x> Solid Species
Fraction
Submenu
Unit
Description
Mean Temperature
Max Temperature
Min Temperature
Outlet Massflow
Flow
kg/s
Outlet Temperature
Flow
Pa
Overall Gas
Species
Conversion
Cumulative Outlet
Species Massflow
kg
259
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
of the simulation up to the
current time point:
260
Mean GHSV
Flow
1/s
Inlet Pressure
Pa
Gas Temperature
(5 Points)
Solid Temperature
(5 Points)
Outer Wall
Temperature (5
Points)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Mean Surface Fraction
Ce2O3(S)
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Surface
Fraction
Mean Reaction
Rate
kmol/
3
(m s)
Mean Surface
Fraction
261
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
continuously for all user
mechanisms in order of their
appearance (AUCI or Fortran
user coding).
262
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Ambient Velocity
m/s
Conversion Of Species
<X>
Conversion Of
Species
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
for that particular species is
connected to the catalyst. Any
actuator channel value will be
cut to the range (0,1). Using
the available control elements
(e.g. Engine Interface, Formula
Interpreter, Matlab DLL, ...)
arbitrary conversion maps can
be defined in addition to the
available conversion maps at the
catalyst element.
Submenu
Unit
Description
Mean Temperature
Max Temperature
Min Temperature
Outlet Massflow
Flow
kg/s
Outlet Temperature
Flow
Pa
Mean GHSV
Flow
1/s
Inlet Pressure
Pa
Soot Mass
kg
kg/s
Gas Temperature
(5 Points)
263
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
five measuring points evenly
distributed over the element's
length (axial positions: 0.0, 0.25,
0.5, 0.75, 1.0).
264
Solid Temperature
(5 Points)
Outer Wall
Temperature (5
Points)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Ambient Velocity
m/s
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
General Catalytic Reaction Rate Multiplier
Submenu
Unit
Description
Mean Temperature
Max Temperature
Min Temperature
Outlet Massflow
Flow
kg/s
Gas Temperature
(5 Points)
Outer Wall
Temperature (5
Points)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Inlet Reynolds Number
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Ambient Velocity
m/s
Dimensionless factor to
influence the Darcy factor at the
inlet (e.g. to simulate a certain
surface roughness).
266
Sensor Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Inj. Massflow
kg/s
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Inlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
Inlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/(kgK)
Outlet Gas
Properties
J/kg
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/kmol
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
3
Outlet Gas
Properties
kg/m
Actuator Channel
Submenu
Unit
Description
Inj. Massflow
kg/s
Unit
Description
Time
Realtime Factor
Actuator Channel
Unit
Description
Operation Control
page [300]
Unit
Description/Definition
Availability
Maximum Temperature
Reduced
Minimum Temperature
267
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Mean Temperature
Reduced
Maximum Temperature
Gradient
K/m
Reduced
Position of Maximum
Gradient
Reduced
Hz
Reduced
268
Hz
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Inlet Engine Lambda
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Ambient Temperature
Reduced
Reduced
kg/(m s)
Source
W/m
Source
Overall Conversion
kg
269
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
270
kg
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
surface. (Variable Wall Temperature
Model)
Overall External Heat Source
W/(m K)
Nusselt Overall
Reduced
Prandtl
Reduced
Grashof
Reduced
Reynolds
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
mol/m
Reduced
271
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
surface sites; for the latter case,
result "Storage site densities"
must be enabled under "Model
Encapsulation")
272
Reduced
kg
Reduced
kg/(m s)
Source
kmol/
3
(m s)
Source
Gas Temperature
Standard
Solid Temperature
Standard
Wall Temperature
Standard
Velocity
m/s
Pressure
Pa
Standard
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Standard
Mole Fraction
mol/mol
Standard
Redox Ratio
page [
Standard
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Excess Oxygen Ratio
page
Standard
page [
Engine Lambda
Surface Fraction
Surface Loading
kg/m
Mass Density
Standard
kg/m
Property
Molar Mass
kg/kmol
Property
Molar Concentration
kmol/m
Property
Heat Capacity
J/(kgK)
Property
Enthalpy
kJ/kg
Property
Conductivity
W/(mK)
Property
Viscosity
Pas
Property
W/(m K)
Property
m/s
Property
Reynolds (Re)
Property
Prandtl (Pr)
Property
Schmidt (Sc)
Property
Nusselt (Nu)
Property
Sherwood (Sh)
Property
273
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
characteristic length divided by gas
species diffusion coefficient (ratio
of convective to diffusive mass
transfer).
Peclet Heat Transfer
Property
Property
Property
GHSV
Hz
Mass Flux
kg/s
Flux
kg/s
Flux
Energy Flux
Flux
Reaction Rate
kmol/
3
(m s)
Source
Rate Continuity
kg/(m s)
Source
Rate Energy
J/(m s)
Rate Species
kg/(m s)
Molar Concentration
kmol/m
Mass Density
Mole Fraction
page [
Source
Extended
kg/m
Extended
Extended
Flux
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The availability of the results listed below is directed by the "Type of Results" setting on the
element's Results Specification page. There are three main results levels standing for an
increasing number of results: Reduced, Standard and All.
The results grouped under "Reduced (Mean and Outlet values)" are a minimal set of results,
thus, all of the levels higher than "Reduced" include the reduced results.
Results not marked as Reduced are generally axially resolved, i.e. they refer to local values
associated with a given output cell/spatial position. The spatial position is part of the folder
name and the curve name.
Each of the special results groups "Standard, Properties", "Standard, Fluxes" and "Standard,
Sources" comprises the Standard results augmented by an extra set of results marked as
Property, Flux and Source, respectively, in the Availability column.
The results type "All" comprises all of the applicable results in the table (i.e. also properties,
fluxes and sources). Results marked as Extended in the Availability column are only shown
when this results type ("All") was selected (i.e. they are not in any of the other results
subsets).
Result Name
Unit
Description/Definition
Availability
Maximum Temperature
Reduced
Minimum Temperature
Mean Temperature
Reduced
Maximum Temperature
Gradient
K/m
Reduced
Position of Maximum
Gradient
Reduced
Hz
Reduced
275
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The Mean GHSV is the sum of the
individual cells' GHSVs weighted
by each cell's volume, at each time
point. It is a measure of how often
the gas volume of the converter is
replaced per time unit.
276
Hz
Reduced
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Ambient Temperature
Reduced
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Wall Pressure Drop
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
kg/m
kg
kg/m
Reduced
kg
Reduced
kg/m
kg
kg/m
Reduced
277
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
volume of the filter is used as
reference.
278
kg/s
Reduced
Reduced
Source
Source
kg/(m s)
W/m
Overall Conversion
kg
kg
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Convec Wall-Amb Heat Flow
Reduced
Reduced
W/(m K)
Nusselt Overall
Reduced
Prandtl
Reduced
Grashof
Reduced
Reynolds
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
279
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Nusselt Free Convection
280
Reduced
Reduced
kg
Reduced
kg/(m s)
Source
kmol/
3
(m s)
Gas Temperature
Standard
Solid Temperature
Standard
Wall Temperature
Standard
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Velocity
m/s
Pressure
Pa
Standard
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Standard
Mole Fraction
mol/mol
Standard
Redox Ratio
Engine Lambda
Soot Mass
kg/m
Standard
kg
Standard
page [
Standard
.
page
page [
Standard
Standard
kg/m
kg
kg/m
kg
Standard
kg/m
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Pa
Standard
Pa
Standard
Standard
281
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
282
kg/m
Standard
m/s
Standard
m/s
Standard
Wall Velocity
Standard
Wall Velocity 1
m/s
Standard
Wall Velocity 2
m/s
Standard
kg/s
Standard
kg/s
Standard
Surface Fraction
Surface Loading
kg/m
Mass Density
kg/m
kg/m
Property
Molar Mass
kg/kmol
Property
Molar Concentration
kmol/m
Property
Heat Capacity
J/(kgK)
Property
Enthalpy
kJ/kg
Property
Conductivity
W/(mK)
Property
Viscosity
Pas
Property
W/(m K)
Property
m/s
Property
Reynolds (Re)
Property
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
gas viscosity (ratio of inertial to
viscous forces).
Prandtl (Pr)
Property
Schmidt (Sc)
Property
Nusselt (Nu)
Property
Sherwood (Sh)
Property
Property
Property
Property
GHSV
Hz
Mass Flux
kg/s
Flux
kg/s
Flux
Energy Flux
Flux
Reaction Rate
kmol/
3
(m s)
Source
Rate Continuity
kg/(m s)
Source
Rate Energy
J/(m s)
page [
Flux
283
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Rate Species
kg/(m s)
Consumption/production rates
of individual gas species due
to chemical reactions (per total
converter volume).
Source
Unit
Description/Definition
Availability
Maximum Temperature
Reduced
Minimum Temperature
Mean Temperature
Reduced
Hz
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
the gas volume of the converter is
replaced per time unit.
Mean GHSV at Norm
Conditions
Hz
Reduced
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Ambient Temperature
Reduced
Reduced
kg/(m s)
W/m
kg
Source
285
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
beginning of the simulation up to the
current time point:
286
kg
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reynolds
Reynolds number
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Nusselt
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Overall Cumulative Wall-Amb
Heat Flow
W/(m K)
Nusselt Overall
Reduced
Prandtl
Reduced
Grashof
Reduced
Reynolds
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
287
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Nusselt Turbulent Forced
Conv
Gas Temperature
Standard
Solid Temperature
Standard
Wall Temperature
Standard
Velocity
m/s
Pressure
Pa
Standard
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Standard
Mole Fraction
mol/mol
Standard
Redox Ratio
page [
Standard
page
Standard
288
page [
Engine Lambda
Mass Density
kg/m
Property
Molar Mass
kg/kmol
Property
Molar Concentration
kmol/m
Property
Heat Capacity
J/(kgK)
Property
Enthalpy
kJ/kg
Property
Conductivity
W/(mK)
Property
Viscosity
Pas
Property
Standard
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
2
W/(m K)
Property
m/s
Property
Reynolds (Re)
Property
Prandtl (Pr)
Property
Schmidt (Sc)
Property
Nusselt (Nu)
Property
Sherwood (Sh)
Property
Property
Property
Property
GHSV
Hz
Mass Flux
kg/s
Flux
Energy Flux
Flux
J/(m s)
kg/(m s)
page [
Flux
Source
289
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
to chemical reactions (per total
converter volume).
Unit
Description/Definition
Availability
Maximum Temperature
Reduced
Minimum Temperature
Mean Temperature
Reduced
Hz
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Mean GHSV at Norm
Conditions
Hz
Reduced
Reduced
Pa
Reduced
Ambient Temperature
Reduced
Reduced
kg/(m s)
Source
W/m
Source
kg
291
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
292
kg
kg/s
Reduced
kg
Reduced
Reduced
kg
Reduced
Wallfilm Surface
Reduced
Wallfilm Volume
mm
Reduced
kg/s
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reynolds
Reynolds number
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Nusselt
Reduced
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Overall Wall-Amb Heat Flow
Reduced
Reduced
W/(m K)
Nusselt Overall
Reduced
Prandtl
Reduced
Grashof
Reduced
Reynolds
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
293
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
by kinematic fluid viscosity of
the ambient fluid surrounding
the element. (Variable Wall
Temperature Model)
Nusselt Free Convection
294
Reduced
Gas Temperature
Standard
Solid Temperature
Standard
Wall Temperature
Standard
Velocity
m/s
Pressure
Pa
Standard
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Standard
Mole Fraction
mol/mol
Standard
Redox Ratio
Engine Lambda
page [
page [
Standard
.
page
Standard
Standard
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
3
Mass Density
kg/m
Property
Molar Mass
kg/kmol
Property
Molar Concentration
kmol/m
Property
Heat Capacity
J/(kgK)
Property
Enthalpy
kJ/kg
Property
Conductivity
W/(mK)
Property
Viscosity
Pas
Property
W/(m K)
Property
m/s
Property
Reynolds (Re)
Property
Prandtl (Pr)
Property
Schmidt (Sc)
Property
Nusselt (Nu)
Property
Sherwood (Sh)
Property
Property
Property
295
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
External Heat Source
GHSV
Hz
Mass Flux
kg/s
Flux
Energy Flux
Flux
J/(m s)
kg/(m s)
page [
Property
Flux
Source
Unit
Description/Definition
Mass Flux
kg/s
Volume Flow
m /s
Gas Temperature
Pressure
Pa
Engine Lambda
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Mole Fraction
kmol/kmol
kg
Unit
Description/Definition
Outlet Boundary:
Result Name
296
page [98]
].
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Mass Flux
kg/s
Gas Temperature
Pressure
Pa
Engine Lambda
page
[95]
Mass Fraction
kg/kg
Mole Fraction
kmol/kmol
kg
Overall Conversion
Unit
Description
Gas Temperature
Gas Velocity
m/s
Gas Density
kg/m
J/(kg.K)
297
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Wall Temperature
Substrate Temperature
Prandtl Number
W/(m.K)
Pa.s
Sensor Temperature
m/s
W/(m .K)
298
Unit
Description
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Number of Jacobian Calculations
Engine On(1)/Off(0)
299
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Local Error in Time Step
Realtime Factor
Inlet Boundary Condition This folder comprises the time derivatives of the inlet boundary
conditions. Steep gradients usually require more computational
Gradients
effort and therefore more CPU time. Beyond that they are
numerically challenging and can lead to convergence failures.
Workload Distribution
300
Gas Temperature
Gradient
K/s
kg/s
1/s
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
From the Sorted by pull down menu, select Message Type, Message ID, Element Name or
Position for the desired display. Select the respective values in the Start from and End at pull
down menus to display messages occurring within a certain crank angle interval.
The global information is shown and more detailed information can be shown by clicking
<RUNINFO> with the mouse. Click the expand button + to show the detailed information in the
folder.
In a steady-state engine simulation it is strongly recommended to check the messages from the
main calculation program displayed during the last calculated cycle. If major irregularities have
occurred, it is essential to check whether the calculation results are plausible.
5.4.1.1. Message Description
Messages generated by the BOOST solver consist of a message header followed by text giving
more detailed information. The format and components of the message header are described as
follows:
<TYPE> <CODE> <ELEMENT> <NUMBER> <ROUTINE> <CRANK ANGLE> DEGCRA
or in case of simulation task "Aftertreatment Analysis"
<TYPE> <CODE> <ELEMENT> <NUMBER> <ROUTINE> <TIME> SECONDS
1. Type
The first part of the message header is the basic type of the message. The possible types
and a brief description are given in the following table.
Message Type
Description
FATALERROR
READERROR
INVALIDINPUT
The value has been read correctly but the value or string
is invalid in this context. This also causes the simulation to
stop.
CONVERGENCEFAIL
301
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
RUNINFO
WARNING
OUTOFRANGE
FILEERROR
MEMORYERROR
2. Code
A number associated with the message which is useful for tracking the exact location in the
code that generated the message.
3. Element
If the message is generated by a specific BOOST element such as a cylinder or junction,
this will be displayed at this location. Otherwise, a character string describing the current
process, such as 'INPUT' or 'CONTROL', will be displayed.
4. Number
The element number that generated the message. If the message is not associated with a
particular element number then a zero will be displayed.
5. Routine
The BOOST routine which generated the message.
6. Crank Angle
The simulation crank angle when the message was generated. This will be in degrees.
7. Time
The simulation time when the message was generated. This will be in seconds.
5.4.2. Preprocessing
This section summarizes all messages from preprocessing phase.
100201 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The name of indicated species is not available in the standard list of species.
Possible solutions
If a user-defined standard species list is applied, please check and extend this list; i.e.
hu_SpecName_Std in module mod_userdef_cat.f90.
Related topics
100202 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
A DLL element in the BOOST model is indicating a MATLAB s-function link or Veristand link, but
there is none. The simulation is aborted.
302
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Possible solutions
Related topics
BOOST Interfaces manual
100203 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
A species is missing either in the Gas Composition, the Liquid Species or Solid Species definition.
However it is required by the indicated mechanism.
Possible solutions
Add the missing species to the either the Gas Composition, the Liquid Species or the Solid
Species list.
Use the "Tolerate Undefined Species" option where applicable.
Disable the related mechanism that makes use of the species.
Related topics
Run Information
page [181]
page [249]
303
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
100206 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The data for mapping an injected liquid fluid onto its liquid components are missing or in the wrong
position.
Possible solutions
Provide the mapping of the injected liquid fluid.
Related topics
Liquid Injected Fluid
page [245]
page [245]
100207 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
Either the gas or the liquid composition of the injected fluid by an Injector element was not specified.
Possible solutions
Provide the composition of the injected fluid.
Related topics
Gaseous Injected Fluid
page [244]
page [245]
100208 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
One of the following errors in the usage of actuation of the Engine Lambda at the Inlet Aftertreatment
Boundary occurred:
1. The actuation of Engine Lambda AND Engine A/F Ratio at the Inlet Aftertreatment Boundary at
the same time is not allowed.
2. The actuation of the Engine Lambda at the Inlet Aftertreatment Boundary requires Gas
Composition to be specified as <Mole Fractions>.
3. The actuation of the Engine Lambda at the Inlet Aftertreatment Boundary requires <N2> to be
selected as species to which gas fraction correction is applied.
Possible solutions
If indicated choose either the "Engine Lambda" or the "Engine A/F Ratio" actuator channel.
If indicated switch the Gas Composition specification at the Inlet Aftertreatment Boundary to
<Mole Fractions>. Note: That this will affect the already defined Species Composition values.
If indicated add the species <N2> to the Gas Composition.
Related topics
Run Information
page [181]
, Boundary Conditions
page [185]
page [258]
100209 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The bend radius for a pipe is too small. Note: zero bend radius is only valid for the first point in the
pipe.
Possible solutions
304
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Double-check the bend radius input for the indicated pipe.
Related topics
Aftertreatment Pipe
page [240]
100210 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
A liquid species could not be found in the liquid materials database, however it has been selected in
the simulation model (e.g. in an Aftertreatment Injector).
Possible solutions
Add the missing liquid species to the Liquid Materials.
Related topics
Liquid Materials
page [249]
100211 - RUNINFO
Possible causes
No map-based conversion has been defined for a gas species, leading to the related actuator not
being connected.
Possible solutions
In order to define the conversion of the particular species, a conversion map needs to be defined
in the related Catalyst component. It is sufficient to define it as "Constant" with a dummy value, e.g.
0.0(-), as this input will be overruled by the connected actuator channel value.
Related topics
Map Based Conversion
page [135]
100212 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The results definition file could not be found. Possible reasons are:
The run-time-environment is not properly set-up, in case BOOST is not started from the
Graphical User Interface (GUI).
The results definition file all_atm_results.xml is missing in the installation; it is supposed
to be in <InstallDirectory>\BOOST\<Version>\files.
Possible solutions
Set the environment variable CUSTOM_ATM_RESULTS_XML to give the path to the file
all_atm_results.xml:
BOOST started from GUI: Set the variable in Options | Environment Settings ...
BOOST not started from GUI: Set the variable in the run-time-evironment.
Related topics
100213 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
305
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The indicated AUCI model could not be found and loaded during the simulation.
Possible solutions
Please check whether the correct path to the archive file (ucp or uca) was provided in the GUI.
Related topics
100214 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
When running a BOOST model using AUCI models in an External Link Application, like SFunction,
NI VeriStand, CRUISE, ..., the simulation model needs to be preprocessed after performing the
"Model Creation" task. This preprocessing step extracts the required AUCI models such that they can
be loaded during simulation by the BOOST solver.
Possible solutions
Please run the <Preprocess Model for BOOST External Link> Python Script from the Utilities menu.
Related topics
Section Using AUCI models in BOOST External Links from the BOOST Aftertreatment Application
Examples documentation.
100215 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
An error occcured while exchanging with (retrieving from / passing to) a AUCI model during the
initialization phase.
Possible solutions
Make sure the AUCI model is compatible with BOOST.
Related topics
100216 - RUNINFO
Possible causes
Specifies whether the Boundary Layer Transfer and Wash Coat Pore Diffusion is calculated by
Reaction Library or by BOOST internal models.
If a transfer model has been selected as "User Defined" and the related model has been coded and
compiled in a custom BOOST kernel, the calculation of the transfer model is switched to BOOST
internal models for the selected component.
Possible solutions
Related topics
-
306
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
100217 - READERROR
Possible causes
An error occurred while reading the indicated data for the given component from the solver input file.
Possible solutions
Double-check the related input in the Graphical User Interface.
Related topics
Input Data
page [181]
100218 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The indicated input value is negative although it should not be.
Possible solutions
Double-check the input in the Graphical User Interface and type in a non-negative value.
Related topics
Input Data
page [181]
100219 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The indicated input value is not positive although it should be.
Possible solutions
Double-check the input in the Graphical User Interface and type in a positive value.
Related topics
Input Data
page [181]
100220 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The indicated input value is outside the allowed range.
Possible solutions
Double-check the input in the Graphical User Interface and make sure the value lies between the
required bounds.
Related topics
Input Data
page [181]
100221 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
An error occurred during the initialization and the simulation had to be stopped. The error can be
found in the previous message(s).
Possible solutions
307
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Check previous warning and error messages for details and take suggested action steps.
Related topics
100222 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
In the indicated Catalyst component a reaction model has been chosen in one of the washcoat
layers that requires liquid species.
However reactions involving liquid species are not compatible with the Washcoat Layer (WCL)
Model.
Possible solutions
Deactivate the respective reactions in your model in the concerned Catalyst.
Turn off the WCL Model.
Related topics
100223 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The sum of initial surface species fractions of a surface site is not equal to 1, but it has to be.
Possible solutions
Double-check and correct your model's surface species fraction settings.
Related topics
100224 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
A heat or mass transfer or pore diffusion model has been selected as "User Defined" (i.e.
mod_userdef_cat.90 or cat_dimless_numbers.f90) and another one as "User Defined (AUCI)". The
evaluation source of models from "User Defined" (FORTRAN User Coding) is a different one than
those of AUCI (AVL User Coding Interface) models and the two cannot be combined.
Possible solutions
Do not select AUCI models when having FORTRAN User Coding models selected in one and
the same component.
Do not select FORTRAN User Coding models when having AUCI models selected in one and
the same component.
Migrate FORTRAN User Coding models to AUCI.
Related topics
100225 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
308
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The washcoat layer model requires a washcoat layer thickness to be provided.
Possible solutions
Employ a user reaction or transfer model specifying a washcoat thickness.
Select at Catalyst | Type Specification the Square Cell Catalyst.
Related topics
Catalyst
page [187]
100226 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The opacity of the innermost or outermost wall layer is not one, although it is required by the model
to be opaque to represent a solid material.
Possible solutions
Choose opaque materials for both, the innermost wall layer and outermost wall layer.
Related topics
100227 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The opacity of two connected wall layers is zero, although it is not allowed by the model to specify
two connected transparent layers.
Possible solutions
Please correct the input for the opacity.
Represent the two layers by one transparent layer.
Correct the opacity input of one of the layers.
Related topics
100228 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
There was an error reading the restart file.
Possible solutions
Ensure that a restart file is available.
Make sure that the restart file matches the simulation model (e.g. it is not allowed to change the
simulation model by adding/deleting components or to change their configuration).
Related topics
100229 - FILEERROR
Possible causes
309
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
There is either no restart file available or it is corrupt.
Possible solutions
Create a restart file first and then run the simulation again in restart mode.
Related topics
100230 - READERROR
Possible causes
The specified restart file does not fit the simulation model.
Possible solutions
Create a valid restart file first and then run the simulation again in restart mode.
Related topics
-
5.4.3. Calculation
This section summarizes all messages from calculation phase.
200201 - INVALIDINPUT
Possible causes
The sum of all species fractions in the boundary element is not equal to 1 and an autocorrection
failed. This happens if the deviation from 1 in the species fraction sum is larger than the species with
the highest fraction in the gas composition.
Possible solutions
Double-check the species fractions in the boundary element or the actuating control element
respectively. Make sure that the deviation from 1 in the sum is not to big; small deviations are
handled by the BOOST solver.
Related topics
200202 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
There was an error during parameter access.
Possible solutions
Please contact BOOST Support.
Related topics
200203 - WARNING
Possible causes
A floating Point Error in the Right-Hand-Side Vector.
310
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
A floating Point Error in the Solution Vector.
A potential floating point error from the solver.
Possible solutions
page [252]
page [252]
200204 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
A floating point error has been detected in the User Defined Reaction Mechanism. This can be
caused by a numerically prohibited operation, for example division by zero.
Possible solutions
Double-check the formulation in mod_userdef_cat.f90 compiled and linked to the custom BOOST
kernel.
For debugging purposes, the values of some solver variables that are typically used in reaction rate
formulations are being printed in this error message.
Related topics
200205 - WARNING
Possible causes
A potential error has been detected in the indicated interface.
Possible solutions
See previous messages in the messages file to find out where exactly the potential error has been
found.
page [252]
In order to handle such error it is recommended to review section Best Practice
; additionally
if custom kinetic and transfer models respectively are used in the simulation model, refer to the
section 'User Coding Guidelines' and related of the AVL User Coding Interface documentation.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200206 - CONVERGENCEFAIL
Possible causes
A convergence failure occurred during the calculation of a particulate filter:
The integration of the gas reactions in the inlet channel did not converge.
The integration of the soot cake-layer did not converge.
The integration of the soot depth-layer did not converge.
The integration of the remaining empty depth-layer did not converge.
The integration of the gas reactions in the filter wall did not converge.
The integration of the gas reactions in the outlet channel did not converge.
The integration of the oxygen diffusion in the inlet channel did not converge.
311
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The pressure drop calculation did not converge.
The pressure drop returned by the flow-solver is zero.
The integration of the soot-migration did not converge.
Possible solutions
Double-check the simulation settings.
Additionally refer to section Best Practice
page [252]
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200207 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The solver stopped as a floating point error (i.e. NaN) had been detected in the solution vector.
Possible reasons:
1) Too huge sources in right-hand sides
2) Too high inlet condition gradients.
Possible solutions
Reduce the time step size.
Reduce the solver tolerances.
Enable the High-Robustness Option.
Related topics
Best Practice: Speed-up and Stability
page [252]
200208 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The maximum number of solver convergence failures was reached.
Possible solutions
Check the settings of your case.
Refer to Best Practice page [252].
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200209 - CONVERGENCEFAIL
Possible causes
An error of unknown source occurred and led to a convergence failure in the calculation. The time
step is either skipped, or in case of selected "High-Robustness Option" the solver recalculates this
step again to avoid the convergence failure.
Possible solutions
Select the "High-Robustness Option".
If suggested re-run the simulation setting the User Defined Parameter
'ATM_VERBOSE_MODE' to 'YES', and then go through the messages file searching for
messages that contain the phrase 'potential error'. These errors indicated the potential source
for the convergence failure.
312
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Related topics
Aftertreatment Solver
page [181]
, Best Practice
page [252]
200210 - RUNINFO
Possible causes
This message is related to the "High-Robustness Option".
The solver requires more robustness.
The maximum number of FCN calls was reached.
A convergence failure was detected.
Appropriate action has been taken by the solver.
Possible solutions
Related topics
200211 - CONVERGENCEFAIL
Possible causes
The iteration procedure for the inlet pressure did not converge. The solver took the initial iteration
value and proceeded with the calculation.
The convergence failure may have been caused by:
High gradients in the inlet flow conditions.
Ill-conditioned spatial grid.
Possible solutions
Decrease the time step size.
Choose a spatial discretization such that the cell sizes of connected components do not differ
too much.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200212 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The maximum number of convergence failures in the particulate filter pressure drop calculation was
reached.
Possible solutions
Double-check the settings of your case. Note that too high soot loadings may lead to channel
clogging forcing the solver to stop.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200213 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
313
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
The value for the pressure drop coefficient derived from the particulate filter flow solution is
physically unreasonable. Hence the simulation could not be continued.
Possible solutions
Double-check your input data, such as the inlet mass flow or filter geometry.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200214 - CONVERGENCEFAIL
Possible causes
The particulate filter flow solver reached the maximum number of iterations. The solution of the last
successful step is re-used.
Possible solutions
Check the simulation settings.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
200215 - CONVERGENCEFAIL
Possible causes
The particulate filter flow solver did not converge when trying to solve the Boundary-Value-Problem.
Possible solutions
Check the simulation settings.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
5.4.4. Postprocessing
This section summarizes all messages from postprocessing phase.
300201 - RUNINFO
Possible causes
314
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
During the simulation the solver has detected potential errors. Such potential errors can lead to
convergence failures but do not necessarily have to.
The ATM Solver has an automatic error detection that takes appropriate action to handle such
errors. However potential errors indicate a risk that the simulation may fail for different simulation
settings, for example a different time step size or different inlet conditions with steeper gradients.
Possible solutions
In order to get more details on the actual kind of potential error re-run the simulation setting the
User Defined Parameter 'ATM_VERBOSE_MODE' to 'YES' and then go through the messages file
searching for messages that contain the phrase 'potential error'. Usually the message before and/or
after give hints where this potential error occurred.
page [252]
It is recommended to review section Best Practice
; additionally if custom kinetic and transfer
models respectively are used in the simulation model, refer to the section 'User Coding Guidelines'
and related of the AVL User Coding Interface documentation.
Related topics
Best Practice
page [252]
300202 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
An error occurred after the calculation of a time-step during postprocessing.
Possible solutions
Double-check the message file for warnings and error prior to this message. These indicate the error
and possible solutions.
Related topics
300203 - FILEERROR
Possible causes
An error occurred when writing the restart file.
Possible solutions
Double-check the message file for warnings and error prior to this message. These indicate the error
and possible solutions.
Related topics
300204 - WARNING
Possible causes
The solver did not converge due to an unreasonable state in the modeling equations of the ATM
System, but tried to recover from the error.
Possible solutions
Double-check the simulation and model settings.
Provide physically reasonable input values.
315
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
If suggested re-run the simulation setting the User Defined Parameter
'ATM_VERBOSE_MODE' to 'YES', and then go through the messages file searching for
messages that contain the phrase 'potential error'. These errors indicate the potential source for
the convergence failure.
Related topics
300205 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
The file to store the restart data in could not be opened.
Possible solutions
Ensure that write-access is available in the working directory.
Related topics
300206 - FILEERROR
Possible causes
No write access to the restart file is available.
Possible solutions
Ensure that write-access is available in the working directory.
Related topics
-
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Even if the solver could manage to handle a detected NaN and finish the calculation successfully
it is recommended to resolve such errors. This can be achieved by simulation model set-up and, if
applicable, by modifying custom model formulations.
Related topics
page [252]
Best Practice
documentation
, section 'User Coding Guidelines' and related of the AVL User Coding Interface
270002 - WARNING
Possible causes
A floating point error, in this case a positive or negative infinity value, was detected. Typical reasons
for the occurrence of an infinity value are the division by zero or arithmetic overflow.
Possible solutions
This generic error message is usually followed by another one indicating when and where this error
has been detected.
If the solver could not manage to handle the infinity value and raised a convergence failure, it is
recommended to analyze the messages following this one. The simulation model set-up should be
changed and, if applicable, custom model formulations have to be revised and modified.
Related topics
page [252]
Best Practice
documentation
, section 'User Coding Guidelines' and related of the AVL User Coding Interface
270003 - RUNINFO
Possible causes
An AUCI model sent this message.
Possible solutions
Follow the instructions by the AUCI model supplier.
Related topics
AVL User Coding Interface documentation
270004 - WARNING
Possible causes
An AUCI model sent this message.
Possible solutions
Follow the instructions by the AUCI model supplier.
Related topics
AVL User Coding Interface documentation
270005 - FATALERROR
Possible causes
An AUCI model sent this message.
317
5. BOOST Aftertreatment
Possible solutions
Follow the instructions by the AUCI model supplier.
Related topics
AVL User Coding Interface documentation
270006 - FATALERROR, SIMULATION STOP
Possible causes
An AUCI model sent this message and forced the simulation to stop.
Possible solutions
Follow the instructions by the AUCI model supplier.
Related topics
AVL User Coding Interface documentation
318