Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
'ENDORSED
F. Clin Kirschner. Jr. (State Bar No. 122502)
Matthew J. Silveira (State Bar No. 264250)
Kelsev Israel-Trummel (State Bar No. 282272)
JONES DAY
555 Califomia Street. 26th Floor
San Francisco. CA 94104
Telephone:
(415)626-3939
Facsimile:
(415) 875-5700
Email:
cki rschner@ J onesDay. com
msilveira(il!JonesDay.com
kitrummel(@JonesDay.com
10
12
S U P E R I O R C O U R T O F T H E ST.4TE O F C A L I F O R N I A
14
COUNTV OF SACRAMENTO
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Respondent.
[Filed Concurrently with Petition to
Confirm]
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:
June 24.2016
2:00 p.m.
53
Hon. David 1. Brown
?7
Petition Filed:
Januarv 26.2016
CIIA S NOTICE OF PET. TO CONFIRM .WD MM. OF P&.\: Case No. .U-2016-00189567
above-entitled court. located ;it 720 9th Street. Sacramento. Califomia. before the Honorable
6
7
the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and upon all such other matters and arguments as
may be presented to the Court at or prior to the hearing on this Petition. It is scheduled to be
10
heard on shortened time as provided in the Court's June 14. 2016 Order, attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
12
Dated: June 16, 2016
Jones Dav
14
15
By:
6V'"
F. Curt Kirschner. Jr.
16
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
C H A S NO I K K OF PE I . I O C O N F I R M A N D M E M . OF P & A : Cast- No. 34-2016-l)018')567
1
2
ST.\TEMENT OF FACTS
On March 14. 2016. this Court granted Petitioner California Ho.spital Association's
("CHA") Petition to Compel Arbitration, finding that the parties had entered into a valid
arbitration agreement and ordering CHA and Respondent SEIU. United Healthcare Workers -
West ("UHW") to arbitrate their dispute regarding the Hospital Executive Compensation Act of
2016 (the '"2016 Executive Compensation Initiative") before .Arbitrator Richard L. Aheam.
(Order Granting Petition to Compel Arbitration [Mar. 14. 2016].) The arbitration hearing
commenced on April 13, 2016. but was adjoumed on April 14. 2016 to pennit extensive
10
discovery. (See Pet. to Confinn. Attach. 8(c) [Award] at p. 1.) Arbitration hearings resumed on
11
May 6, 2016, and continued on May 7, 11. 12. and 13th. (See ibid.) Following the close of
12
evidence, both parties submitted exten.sive post-hearing briefs and UHW sought and was given
13
pennission to file a supplemental reply brief (See/t7. at pp. 1-2.) On June 6, 2016, the Arbitrator
14
issued an opinion and partial final award prohibiting UHW and its agents from pursuing,
15
sponsoring or supporting the 2016 Executive Compensation Initiative, which required UHW and
16
its agents to immediately withdraw the 2016 Executive Compensation Initiative from the ballot
17
qualification process and take any other acts necessary to terminate their pursuit, sponsorship, or
18
19
IL
20
ARGUMENT
"Absent a clear expression of illegality or public policy undennining [Califomia's] strong
21
presumption in favor of private arbitration, an arbitral award should ordinarily stand immune
22
from judicial scmtiny." (Moncharsh v. Heily I'i Bla.'ie (\992) ^ CaX.Ath \, 10.) Moreover, an
23
arbitration award may be vacated only on the nartow statutory grounds identified in Code of Civil
24
Procedure section 1286.2. (/t/. at 12-13.) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq.,
25
"the superior court and the appellate court must give every intendment of validity to an award,
26
and the burden is on the party claiming invalidity to support such claim with evidence." (Nat'l
27
Marble Co. V. Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen (1986) 184 CaI.App.3d 1057, 1066: see also
28
Painters Dist. Council No. 33 v. Mocn (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 1032, 1041 ["The burden is on the
CHA S NOTICE OF PET. TO CONFIR.M AND MEM. OF P&A: Case No. 34-2016-0018'J567
CH.A is not aware of any colorable grounds tor vacatur ofthe Award. .All arguments
4 i bearing any connection to the statutory grounds for \ acating an arbitration award that UHW has
presented to date have been rejected by this Court and denied review by the Court of .Appeals or
6
were thoroughly analyzed and rejected by the .Arbitrator. (See Order Granting Petition to Compel
Arbitration [Mar. 14. 2016]; Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandate [Apr. 8. 2016]: Pet. to
The fact that the Award includes injunctive relief does not modify the presumptive
10
standards for enforcement ofthe Avvard. Substantively, an award of injunctive relief talis within
I1
an arbitrator's "wide discretion ... to fashion a just remedy, including equitable relief that a court
12
may not grant, as long as the remedy is rationally related to the contract and the breach."' (Swan
Magnetics. Inc. v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal..App.4tli 1504. 1511 [citations and internal
quotation marks omitted].) The arbitration agreement in this ca.se did not place any limitations on
15
the Arbitrator's authority, but in.stead provided that he would "resolve any disputes over the
16
application and interpretation of [the Code]" and have "final and binding authority to enforce [the
17
Code] and resolve issues that rise during" its course. (Pet. to Confimi, Attach. 4(b) [Code of
18
Conduct] 111(B).) Procedurally, "an arbitrator, in order to provide a proper remedy for,the
19
prevailing party, may resolve certain critical areas of a dispute in a 'partial final award' but
20
reserve jurisdiction to later decide, by a 'final award,' issues which will likely arise as a result of
21
the implementation of that remedy.'' (Highiower v. Superior Court (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1415,
22
1419 [emphasis in original].) Partial final awards are immediately confirmable. (/c/. at 1420.)
23
24
25
26
-8
' CHA understands UHW will be petitioning to vacate the Award. CFIA will respond to
any arguments made in UHW's petition pursuant to the schedule included in the Court's order
setting the brieiing and hearing schedule in this matter.
2
CIIA'S NOTICE OF PET. TO CONFIRM AND MK.M. OF P&TATCase No. .34-20I6-00189.;67
1
2
JONES DAY
41
5
6
By:F. Curt_J^Ji2ljS^--^
Kirschner. Jr
Attomeys for Petitioner
CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
7
S
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
CIIA^S NOTICE OF PET. TO CONFIRM AND MEM. OF P&A: Case No. 34-2016-00189f?67
EXHIBIT A
4 i felephonc:
F.icsimile:
Email:
f
(415) 626-3939
(415) 875-5700
ckirschnerwJonesDay.com
msilveirai JonesDay.com
kiirummei{2iJonesDay.com
io i
12 I
!3 :;
-!4-ti
"1
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
16 I
Petitioner.
17 IV.
"1
- WEST,
20 1
Respondent.
WORKERS
Date:
Time:
Dept.:
Judge:
Petition Filed:
21 i
22 I
23 i'
25 I
26 I
27
28 I
This mailer came before ihc Cmiri on Petiiioner California Hospital Association s
r Cl f.A'") .v Parle Applicafion l or An Order Shortening Time On Petitions To Conllrm And
Vacate .Arbitration Award. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS CHA s Fix Parte
Application and ORDERS as fbllows:
1.
5 i
'I
West. 'UHW") shall file its Petition to Vacate on June 16. 2016. Each party shall serve a cs.py of
its Peiition on counsel lor the other by personal delivery or electronic mail.
7 ^
8i
at 9:00
9 I
!0 \
CHA shall file its Petition to Co.nfirm and SEIU, United Healthcare Workers -
2.
r'/*^'
Each party shall file any response to the other's petition on or before June 2^, 2016 j
a.m. Each party shall serve a copy of any response on counsel for the other by personal
tl I
12 IDepartment 53.
I
13 I
4.
/ H - ^' '
atzn. p m in
\
Counsel tor CHA is Ordered to immediately ser\c a copy ofthis Order by pcrscnal j
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16 I
17 j
18 [
-'
19 I
r-
20 I
21 I
22 j
23 \
I
25
24 I
27 I
i
28 !
I
'PROPOSED! ORDFR SHORTENING TIME; Case No. 34-2016-O0189567