Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
RESULTS
Among the 492 cardiac valve replacements described above, 37 perivalvular leaks (7.5 %) were observed postoperatively. While the interrupted
Mersilene technique accounted for 5.1 % of the leaks, the continuous Prolene
suture technique resulted in nearly three times as many (14.0 %). There
was an approximately identical incidence of perivalvular leaks (5 %) in both
the aortic and mitral valve positions with the use of the interrupted suture
method. The continuous Prolene technique was associated with a periprosthetic leak incidence of 8.8 %7 in the mitral valve position and 21.4 % in
the aortic valve position. Thus, the continuous Prolene suture technique
Suture
Technique
& Material
Perivalvular
Leaks
No. of
Valves
Perivalvular
Leaks
Position
Interrupted
U Figure
2-0 Mersilene
356
18
( 5.1%)
201 aortic
155 mitral
10
8
( 5.0%)
( 5.2%)
Continuous
2-0 Prolene
136
19
(14.0%)
56 aortic
80 mitral
12
7
(21.4%)
( 8.8%)
Interrupted
Valve
Valve
Position
18
10 aortic
8 mitral
4
3
3
3
1
0
19
12 aortic
7 mitral
6
7
4
7
2
0
U Figure
2-0 Mersilene
Continuous
2-0 Prolene
No. Redo
Perivalvular
Leaks
355
DISCUSSION
The problems encountered in connecting living tissue to a rigid artificial
material in the presence of disruptive forces suggest that it may be impossible
TABLE
Ill.
Suture
Technique
& Material
Aortic
Valves
Interrupted
U Figure
2-0 Mersilene
(n = 10)
LK 16x3
LK 18
LK 20x3
BS 23x2
BS 25
(n = 8)
SE 6550
SE 6320x2
LK
25x5
Continuous
2-0 Prolene
(n = 12)
LK 20
LK 22x2
LK 25x3
BS 25
BS 27x2
BS 29
BS 31x2
(n = 7)
LK 25x7
LK= Lillehei-Kaster
BS = Bjork-Shirley
SE = Starr-Edwards
Number (n) indicates size and/or model
356
Mitral
Valves
'O
...... ::%
.I:
to eliminate periprosthetic leaks completely. The suture method used for the
implantation of cardiac valves, however, may have a considerable influence
on the firmness and durability of such a union. Fixation of a cardiac valve
with interrupted sutures establishes a healing interspace between the annulus
and prosthesis,78 does not affect tissue between the individual sutures, and
may allow for at least minimal expansion of the annulus. Continuous suturing, on the other hand, produces uniform strangulation of tissue within the
suture line, especially in the presence of tension, and also prevents expansion
of the annulus. If the suture is not drawn tightly enough, however, it will
be subjected to excessive mechanical stress and fatigue-induced fracture,
which is most likely to occur with a monofilamentous material such as Prolene. Fracture of a continuous suture line will also cause extensive dehiscence,
amounting to V4 of the annular circumference in mitral valve replacement
and I/3 of the circumference in aortic valve replacement. Therefore, fracture
of a continuous suture line results in greater leakage and more severe symptoms than would result from the fracture of interrupted sutures.
The use of continuous sutures for prosthetic valve implantation has been
advocated by a number of authors.""'9"""0` Only two groups using continuous
Prolene suture techniques, however, have reported an increased incidence of
perivalvular leaks.8'12 In the two groups compared here, there was no significant difference in surgeons, valve models, or quality of the annular tissue. Therefore, the higher frequency of periprosthetic dehiscence and the
greater severity of symptoms in patients subjected to continuous suture implantation of both mitral and aortic valves must be related to the suture
method and/or the suture material used. A high incidence of periprosthetic
leaks may represent an unfortunate combination of annular tissue strangulation and the material fatigue propensity of Prolene. As a consequence of
our study, we abandoned the use of continuous sutures in cardiac valve
replacement, and the incidence of perivalvular leaks has declined to well
under 5 %.
SUMMARY
Between 1974 and 1976, the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular
Surgery of Hannover Medical School evaluated two different suture materials and techniques during 492 cardiac valve replacements in 448 patients.
While 356 prostheses (201 aortic/ 155 mitral) were implanted with an interrupted Mersilene 2-0 suture technique, 136 valves (56 aortic/80 mitral)
were replaced with continuous Prolene 2-0 sutures. Thirty-seven perivalvular
leaks resulted (7.5 o) - 5.1 %/ after implantation with interrupted Mersilene and 14.0 % after continuous suturing. In the aortic position, the continuous suture technique produced four times as many periprosthetic leaks
as did the standard method. Perivalvular leaks occurring after continuous
suture fixation required surgical repair twice as often as after the interrupted
suture technique. Twenty reoperations, resulting in a hospital mortality of
10%, were necessary to eliminate leakage.
358
REFERENCES
1. Pellegrini A, Marcazzan E, Peronace B, De Gasperis C, Gordini V, Mombelloni
G: Ten years' experience in heart valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 16:612,
1966
Messmer
BJ, Okies JE, Hallman GL, Cooley DA: Aortic valve replacement:
2.
T,wo years' experience vith the Bjork-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis. Surgery
72:772, 1972
3. Kastor JA, Akbarian M, Buckley MJ, Dinsmore RE, Sanders CA, Scannell JG,
Austen WG: Paravalvular leaks and hemolytic anemia following insertion of
Starr-Edwards aortic and mitral valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56:279,
1968
4. Sandza JG, Clark RE, Ferguson TB, Connors JP, Weldon CS: Replacement
of prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 74:864, 1977
5. Weldon CS, Ferguson TB: The elimination of periprosthetic leaks as a complication of mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 18:447, 1974
6. Favaloro RG, Effler DB, Groves LK, Suarez E, Shirey EK: Surgical repair
of leaking prosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 3:503, 1967
7. Fishman NH, Hutchinson JC, Roe BB: Prevention of prosthetic cardiac valve
detachment. Surgery 67:867, 1970
8. Messmer BJ, Okies JE, Hallman GL, Cooley DA: Mitral valve replacement
with the Bjork-Shiley tilting-disk prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62:938,
1971
9. Wada J: The knotless method for prosthetic valve fixation. Int Surg 46:317,
1966
10. Messmer BJ, Hallman GL, Liotta D, Martin C, Cooley DA: Aortic valve replacement: New techniques, hydrodynamics, and clinical results. Surgery
68:1026, 1970
11. Cleland J: A universally applicable continuous suture technique for insertion
of aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 19:719, 1975
12. Leachman RD, Cokkinos DVP: Absence of opening click in dehiscence of
mitral valve prosthesis. N Eng J Med 281:461, 1969
359