Você está na página 1de 39

Process Dynamics and Control

Chapter 7

FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Chapter Objectives
End of this chapter, you should be able to:
1.

Explain the concept of feedback control

2.

Explain P, I and D controllers

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Introduction

Consider the continuous blending process,


shown in Fig.
IP

Electrical Signal
Pneumatic signal

AC

x1, w1

xsp
x2, w2

AT

x, V

xm

x, w
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Feedback Control System


Control objective:
To keep the tank exit composition x at the
desired setpoint by adjusting w2.
Measurement : Composition AnalyzerTransmitter (AT)
Feedback controller: AC Automatic Controller
Final control element: Pneumatic control valve

Current-to-pneumatic transducer: I/P


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Historical Perspective of
Feedback Controllers
1930s Commercial Three-mode controllers with
proportional, integral and derivative
(PID) feedback control action

1940s Widespread acceptance of pneumatic


PID controllers
1950s Electronic counterparts in the market
1960s Computer applications
1980s Use of digital hardware
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Block diagram of a feedback control


loop:

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Basic Control Modes


Proportional, Integral and Derivative
Proportional Control
In feedback control, the objective is to reduce the
error signal to zero.
Define an error signal, e, by

e(t ) y SP (t ) y m (t )

(7.1)

where y sp = set point


ym = measured value of the controlled variable
(or equivalent signal from transmitter)
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Proportional Control

For proportional control, the controller output is


proportional to the error signal
p(t) p K c e(t)

where

3/7/2012

(7.2)

p(t) = controller output


p = bias value (adjustable, manual reset)
Kc = controller gain (dimensionless, adjustable,
tuning)

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Function of proportional term

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

Process Dynamics and Control

Proportional Band, PB:


Definition : Proportional band is the percentage
change in measured value required to give a 100%
change in output
100% Actuator span
PB

Kc
Input span

100%
PB
Kc

(7.3)

Applies when Kc is dimensionless

Small (narrow) PB corresponds to large Kc


Large (wide) PB corresponds to small Kc
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

10

Process Dynamics and Control

Ideal vs. actual


Ideal controller does not
include physical limits

A controller saturates
when its output reaches a
physical limit, either pmax
or pmin.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

11

Process Dynamics and Control

Proportional controller
In order to derive the transfer function for an ideal
proportional controller, define a deviation variable
as
p(t ) p(t ) p
(7.4)
Then (7.2) can be written as
p(t ) K c e(t )

(7.5)

Taking Laplace transform of (7.5) and rearranging


we get
P ( s)
Kc
(7.6)
E ( s)
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

12

Process Dynamics and Control

Proportional controller
An inherent limitation of proportional controller is
that a steady-state error (offset) occurs after a setpoint change or a sustained disturbance.
Offset can be eliminated by manually resetting
either the set-point or bias after an offset occurs
impractical.

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

13

Process Dynamics and Control

Reverse or Direct Acting Controller


Kc can be made positive or negative
Reverse-Acting (Kc > 0)
output increases as input
decreases (measured
value, ym(t))"
Direct-Acting (Kc < 0)
controller output increases
as input increases
(measured value, ym(t))"

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

14

Process Dynamics and Control

Integral Control
reset control, floating control
For integral action, the controller output depends
on the integral of the error signal over time,
1
p(t ) p
I

e(t)dt

(7.7)

where I is an adjustable parameter and referred to


as the integral time constant or reset time, has units
of time.
The transfer function:
3/7/2012

P (s)
1

E(s) I s

(7.8)

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

15

Process Dynamics and Control

Integral Control
An important practical advantage: Eliminates offset.

For the process being controlled to be at steady state, the


controller output p must be constant so that the manipulated
variable is also constant.
Eq. (7.7) implies that p changes with time unless e(t) = 0.
This desirable situation occurs unless the controller output
or the final control element saturates.
The control action by the integral controller is very little
until the error signal has persisted for sometime.

On the other hand, proportional controller takes immediate


corrective action as soon as an error is detected.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

16

Process Dynamics and Control

Function of integral term

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

17

Process Dynamics and Control

PI Controller
Integral control is used in conjunction with
proportional control as the proportional-integral (PI)
controller:
t

1
p(t ) p K c e(t ) e(t )dt
I 0

(7.9)

The corresponding transfer function is:

P(s)
1

K c 1
E(s)
Is
3/7/2012

(7.10)

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

18

Process Dynamics and Control

PI Controller
The response of the PI controller to a unit step
change in e(t) is shown in Fig.

1/ I

3/7/2012

- repeats per minute


CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

19

Process Dynamics and Control

PI Controller
Disadvantages:
Produces oscillatory response
Reset windup

When a sustained error occurs, the integral term becomes


quite large and the controller output eventually saturates
reset windup or integral windup.
Antireset windup: Temporarily halting the integral action
whenever the control output saturates.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

20

Process Dynamics and Control

Reset windup
SP=setpoint
PV=process
variable to
control

Valve
movement

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

21

Process Dynamics and Control

Anti wind-up

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

22

Process Dynamics and Control

Derivative control
Rate action, pre-act, anticipatory control
Anticipate the future error by considering its rate of
change.
For ideal derivative action,
p(t ) p D

de(t )
dt

(7.11)

where D is the derivative time, and has units of time.


As long as the error is constant de/dt = 0, the controller
output is equal to p .

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

23

Process Dynamics and Control

Derivative control
Derivative action is never used alone.
Always used in conjunction with P or PI control.
PD controller has the transfer function
P(s)
K c 1 D s
E(s)

(7.12)

The derivative control action tends to stabilize the


controlled process.

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

24

Process Dynamics and Control

PID Controller
PID control algorithm is given by
t

1
de
p(t ) p K c e(t ) e(t )dt D
I 0
dt

(7.13)

Transfer function of an ideal controller (parallel form)

P(s)
1

K c 1
D s
E(s)
Is

(7.14)

Transfer function actual (Series form)


s 1 Ds 1
P(s)

K c I
E(s)

1
I D

3/7/2012

lead / lag
units
CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

(7.15)

25

Process Dynamics and Control

ON-OFF controllers
Synonyms:

two-position or bang-bang controllers.

Ideal controller

More practical controller


(Dead band)
Special case of proportional controller with very high gain.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

26

Process Dynamics and Control

Typical responses of Feedback


control systems
Consider response of a controlled system after a sustained
disturbance occurs (e.g. step change in load variable)
No control
New steady state is
reached
P control
Offset reduced
PI control
Offset eliminated
Oscillatory response
PID control
Oscillations reduced
No offset
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

27

Process Dynamics and Control

Typical responses of Feedback


control systems
Too small a value of Kc
Sluggish response
Larger deviation
Too large a value of Kc
Exhibit oscillatory or unstable behavior
Intermediate values of Kc is desirable
Increasing D tends to improve the response
by reducing the maximum deviation,
response time, and degree of oscillation
If D is too large, measurement noise is
amplified and the response may become
oscillatory.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

28

Process Dynamics and Control

Typical responses of Feedback


control systems

Increasing the integral time makes the controller more


sluggish.
Offset will be eliminated for all values I
For large values of I , it takes very long time to return to
the set-point.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

29

Process Dynamics and Control

Characteristics of the Most


Commonly Used Controller Modes
1. Two Position:
Inexpensive
Extremely simple
2. Proportional:
Simple

Inherently stable when properly tuned


Easy to tune
Experiences offset at steady state
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

30

Process Dynamics and Control

Characteristics of the Most


Commonly Used Controller Modes
3. Proportional plus reset:
No offset

Better dynamic response than reset alone


Possibilities exist for instability due to lag introduced
4. Proportional plus rate:
Stable
Less offset than proportional alone (use of higher gain
possible).
Reduces lags, i.e., more rapid response.
3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

31

Process Dynamics and Control

Characteristics of the Most


Commonly Used Controller Modes
5. Proportional plus reset plus rate:
Most complex
Rapid response
No offset

Difficult to tune
Best control if properly tuned.

3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

32

Process Dynamics and Control

Conclusion!

3/7/2012

Concept of feedback control


P, I, D controller modes
Advantages and disadvantages
Motivation for additional modes

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

33

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

34

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

35

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

36

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

37

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

38

Process Dynamics and Control


3/7/2012

CBB 3013 - Chemical Process Dynamics and Control

39

Você também pode gostar