Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Priority Health NHS Trust, Health Centre, Cross Street, Dudley DY1 1RN;
of Occupational Health, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT; Birmingham
Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS; and ||The Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2QZ, UK
Institute
Judgements about the health of clinical health care workers in relation to fitness to
practice are made by a variety of doctors. These guidelines have been written to
assist with such judgements and to facilitate equitable decision making in matters
of employment.
Key words: Doctors; fitness to practice; guidelines; health care workers; nurses;
standards of health.
Received 23 October 2000; revised 25 September 2001; accepted 27 September 2001
Introduction
In the nineteenth century, maintenance of personal
health was a fundamental duty and a matter of professional pride for nurses [1]. However, little appears
to have been written about the health of doctors.
Complaints about ill doctors were dealt with by the
General Medical Councils Conduct Committee until
1980, when a health jurisdiction committee was
established on the recommendation of the Merrison
Report [2]. The General Nursing Council (UKCC)
followed with a similar health committee in 1983. More
recently, the health of doctors and nurses has come under
scrutiny with specific recommendations being made
about standards of health for nurses in the Clothier [3]
and Bullock [4] Reports. The Department of Health has
also published guidelines for health care workers
(HCWs) who are infected or may be at risk of being
infected with the human immunodeficiency, hepatitis B
or hepatitis C viruses [57].
This guidance has been written to facilitate openness
and equitable decision making, and to ensure that all
relevant employment issues related to health are taken
into consideration when judgements are being made
about the fitness of a clinical HCW to practice. It is not
intended to cover every medical condition or to be
Correspondence to: Dr C. J. M. Poole, Consultant Occupational
Physician, Dudley Priority Health NHS Trust, Health Centre, Cross
Street, Dudley DY1 1RN, UK. Tel: +44 1384 366416; fax: +44 1384
366422.
Fitness to practice
Judgements about a practitioners health in relation to
fitness to practice are currently made by various groups
of doctors, including professional bodies, three wise
men, managers and occupational physicians. Problems
with performance, conduct or health should in the first
instance be addressed locally, but if this fails and there is
concern that patients are being put at risk, then the
appropriate regulatory body must be informed [8]. On
matters of health and safety, risk assessments should be
made by competent persons [9]. At the local level,
we believe that specialist risk assessments of fitness to
18
C. J. M. Poole et al.: Guidance on standards of health for clinical health care workers 19
Hearing impairment
Mild-to-moderate hearing loss should not create problems with clinical practice, provided the HCW has been
appropriately rehabilitated with adaptive technology.
Such technology includes a hearing aid, loop system,
telephone amplifier, vibrating bleep, transmitter and
visual alarms. In the absence of a functional test or
relevant research, it would seem prudent to recommend
that a clinical HCW who undertakes auscultation as part
of their job, with a mean hearing threshold loss of >35 dB
in the frequency range of 5004000 Hz, should use an
electronic stethoscope.
Severe hearing loss will create difficulty with tasks such
as taking a history from a young child, communicating
with a very ill or infirm patient or auscultation, even
with an electronic stethoscope. Emergency situations,
intensive therapy units, areas where there is a lot of
background noise and operating theatres where masks
have to be worn are areas of practice where patient care is
likely to be compromised. A successful cochlear implant
may re-establish safe clinical practice in these situations.
Someone whose primary mode of communication is sign
language is unlikely to be suited to training as a clinical
HCW except in a very specialized area such as a school
for the deaf.
20
Tuberculosis
Clinical HCWs in the UK, especially nurses and those
working in mortuaries or microbiology laboratories, are at
an increased risk of catching tuberculosis (TB) compared
with the general population [27,28]. Such staff should be
advised of their increased risk, told the symptoms of TB
and told to report relevant symptoms to the occupational
health department. The risk of infection with TB is
reduced by BCG vaccination [29], which is recommended in the UK for non-immune clinical HCWs
[30,31]. Pre-placement health screening should include
C. J. M. Poole et al.: Guidance on standards of health for clinical health care workers 21
Blood-borne viruses
The regulatory bodies for doctors, dentists and nurses
have advised on the professional responsibilities of practitioners infected or who have placed themselves at risk
of infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) or human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HCWs undertaking
exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) should have evidence
of immunity or non-infectivity to HBV [6]. All nonimmune clinical HCWs should be vaccinated against
HBV, and following successful immunization, it is
recommended that one single booster of vaccine only
should be given after 5 years [30]. HCWs who are
non-responders to vaccine and who are non-immune
should be advised in writing of their immune status and
the need for post-exposure prophylaxis with specific
hepatitis B immunoglobulin after a high-risk inoculation
incident. Because of recent reports of transmission from
doctor to patient [40], it is now a requirement of the
Department of Health that HCWs who are hepatitis B
e antigen-negative carriers of the virus and who undertake EPPs or work in renal dialysis units must have
<103 genome equivalents/ml viral DNA (HSC 2000/20).
Current Department of Health guidelines still permit
HCWs who are hepatitis C antibody positive to perform
EPPs although transmission from doctor to patient has
been recorded in these circumstances [4144]. Affected
clinicians should, if appropriate, be offered treatment, but
advised that these guidelines are under review and may
change. Those in training should be advised to consider
changing to work that does not involve EPPs.
Transmission of HIV from HCW to patient has been
recorded now on two separate occasions [45,46]. Clinical
HCWs who are HIV antibody positive, confirmed in two
independent laboratories, must not perform EPPs [5]. As
with other immunosuppressed patients, clinical HCWs
who are HIV seropositive, or at high risk of being positive,
22
Acknowledgements
We thank the following for their contributions: Dr Ian Foulds,
Birmingham Skin Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham;
Professor John Govan, University of Edinburgh, Glasgow;
Professor Linda Luxon, National Hospital for Nervous
Diseases, London; Mr Tim Lang, Mills & Reeve Solicitors,
Birmingham; Professor Philip Murray, Birmingham and
Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham; Mr David
Proops, Department of Otolaryngology, The Queen Elizabeth
Hospital, Birmingham; Dr Alistair Robertson, Department of
Occupational Health, University Hospital of Birmingham
NHS Trust; Dr Peter Verow, Department of Occupational
Health, Sandwell Healthcare NHS Trust; and Dr John
Winer, Neuroscience Centre, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
Birmingham.
References
Employment law
HCWs who are at increased risk of illness or injury as a
result of their work must be given information, instruction and training on how to reduce such risks. Clinical
HCWs who contract an illness or who suffer an injury as
a result of their work are entitled to NHS Injury Benefit
(form AW13) and may be entitled to Industrial Injury
Benefit from the Benefits Agency. Doctors who are asked
to provide information about patients for the purpose of
employment should release information in accordance
with the Access to Medical Reports Act (1988) [54]. The
provision of such information falls within category 1 of
the Terms and Conditions of Service of Hospital Medical
and Dental Staff (appendix 3, sections 36 and 37) for
which no fee is payable.
The Disability Discrimination Act (1995) requires that
C. J. M. Poole et al.: Guidance on standards of health for clinical health care workers 23
24