Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SECTION 11
DE LA FEDERATlQ\J EUROPEENNE DELA MANUfENTlQ\J
STEllGFRDEREA eM.ANUTENTION CX)NTJNUE eCXJNllNlX)US I-!M'J[)JNG
39/41, rue Louis Slanc - 92400 Courbevoie
92038 Paris La Dfense cedex, France
1131. 01 47176335 - tlcopie 01 47176330
l8l
.1997
SECTION U
,:'
DOCUMENT 2131/2132 .
GENERALSUMMARY
chapter 1
chapter 2:
"
chapter3
hapter4
p4-1 to 4-34
chapter 5
chapter 6
p 6-1 to 6-19,
,p3-tto 3.;83
edition 1997
Chapter 1
FEM Sectiori Il .
CHAPTER 1
CONTENTS
Clause
Page
1-1
1-3
1-2
1-5
1-3
1-6
1-4
1-6
1-5
1-8
.. ./
'
Datei registriert fr TAKRAF GmbH - Bestellung: 402095 - 1Lizenz(en)
FEM Section II
1-3
11'
The rules,for the design of mobile equipment for continuous handling of bulkmaterials developed by the
Technical Committee of FEM Section n have always been widely used in many countries throughout the
world.
It should be mentioned,tha:t, since its January 1978 edition,lhe documentFEM 2131- 0l/1978 has been'
adopted as an ISO international standard under the reference ISO 504911. It shall be proposed for this ISO
"'standard arevision to include the corresponding chapters of the present FEM edition.
The revision done in 1997 does not bring fundamental changes to the 1992 edition. Tbe important
modifications deal with the following points:
- fatigue calculation of mechanisms,
- friction resistances to define drive mechanisrns and braking devices,
- tables describing cases of notch effect for welded structure.
In order to keep the history ofthe evolution of these ru1es which apply to the machines defmed below in
. the clause "Scope", it nas been indicated below what are the added valiJes of the 19~2 edition to the
documents :
a)
FEM 2131, ' edition January 1978 "Rules for the design of mobile continuousbulk handling'
equipment - chapter I Structures",
b) FEM 2 132, edition June 1977 "Rules for the design of mobile continuous bulk handling
equipment - chapter II Mechanisms".
FEM Section IJ had decided to issue tbe 1992 edition of these design rules, with a threefold objective : '
I) to make the periodical revision oftbe above rule~ to update them,
2)
3) to harmonize them, as far as possible, with the third edition of the design rules issued by
FEM Section I in 1988 forthe design of lifting appliances.
The following comments can be made on the three objectives which are at the origin of the 1992 edition :
1) Revision of the rules FEM 2 131 - FEM 2 13 2
The 1992periodicalrevision didnot involvefundamental changes; but was an updating which
essentially took into account tbe changes brought in other standardswith regard for example 10 units,
welding symbols, etc.
'2) Additions to the previous edition
Tbe 1992 editionhad been completed with two chapters covering :
- safety requirements (chapter 5)
- tests and tolerances (chapter 6)
It was planned to add an "Eleclrical" chapter in a next edition.
.../
\.
Datei registriert fr TAKRAF GmbH - Bestellung: 402095 - 1Lizenz(en)
1-4
FEM Section 11
,,r
3) . Harmonization with the 3rd edition ofFEM Section I designrules forlifting appliances
Design departments which have to design both handling equipment (FEM Section 11 rules) and lifting
equipment (FEMSection I ruIes) have sometimes met difficulties due to a certain lack of consistency
between the corresponding rules.
.
While it shoulrl bepointed out thatcontinuous handling equiprnentand lifting appliances are different
with regardtothe definition ofloads and theircombinations, it should bented, on the other hand, that
the method of c1assificationof the machines, of their mechanisms or components, and the calculation
of certain elements, should be similar if not identical.
The 1992 edition therefore tries to be in harmony with FEM Section I design mIes tathe greatest
possible extent. Some differences however remain : it may be possible to reduce themlater when the
results of many sludies currentlyin progress (calculalion for faligue, definition of rail wheels,
calculation of wind effects,...) are known.
I
b
1
\
!
\.
4) Major changes in Ihe documents FEM 2 131 .and 2 132 editions of 1978 and 1977 respectively
I
II should be stressed that the 1992 version of the design rules for continuous bulk handling equipment
does not include any major changes in its content compared to the previotis edition which consisted of
documents FEM 2 BI and 2 132.
,.1
In particular, the definition of Ihe loads applying on machines and Ihe combination of loads have been
maintained for Ihe mosI part.
The principal changes can be summarized as follows :
- Clssification of the machines. Iheir mechanisms and components
Groups have been created to facilitate dialogue between user and manufacturer. As far as the whole
machine is concerned. these groups called A2 to A8 are directly based on the totaldesired duration
of utilization.
!
Mechanisms can be c1assified in eighl groups called MI 10 M8, each groupbeing based on a
spectrum c1ass on 'one hand aJid a c1ass of utilizalion (i.e. on alotal duration of ulilization) on the
otherhand.
Struclural or mechanism componenls can be c1assified in eight groups named El to E8, each of
them being based, in the same way as mechanisms, on a c1ass of load spectrum and a c1ass of
utilization.
Loads tobe taken into accountn the calculation Of slructures
Clarifications have been made regarding the definition of these loads, in particular on the subject of
. wind Ioads. A load case has been added for special situalions which may occur for machines during
erection.
- Calculating the stresses in structural componenls
A method for selecting the steel grade in relation to brittled fraclure has been added : the choice is to
he made belween four quality groups which are distinguished by Ihe impactstrength of the
corresponding steels.
The chapter on bolted joints has been reworked and completed.
.. ./
FEM Section ti
1-5
The curvs giving tbe pennissible fatigue stresses for structural components have been maintained
and given in relation to tbe component classification group.
Checking and choice of mechanism components
Wire ropes ~e chosen on the basis of a practical safety factor which depeilds on the mechanism
classification group. The rope breaking strength takes intoaccount therope fill factor and spinning
loss factor.
. lor
...
. '. ,:~.~.;:
Regarding the choice of rail wheels, tbe factor C2 is given in relation to the class of utilization 'of .
lhe mechanism and nol tbe classification group, in order to keep tbe metbod used so. far which is
",.':
fully satisfaclory.
To conclude the summary oftbe major changes introduced in 1992 tothe previous editiori (documenIs
FEM 2 131 and 2 132), il is wOrlhwhile noting lhat tbe, changes made during lhe elaboralion of tbe
standardJSO 504911 published in 1994 (which reproduced tbe FEM mIes 2131); have of course been
incorporaled in tbe 1992 edition.
""1.
"
.. ~1-2
INTRODUCTION
To facililale tbe use of these mIes by tbe purchasers, manufacturers andsfety organizations concemed, its
necessary to give some explanalion in regard to tbe lwo following questions :
- How should these mIes be applied in praclice 10 lhe differenl types of appliance whose construction tbey .
cover?
- How should a purchaser use tbese mIes to define his requiremenrs in relationlO' ailappliailce which he
desires to order and what conditions should he specify in his enquiry 10 ensure that the manufaclurers can
subrnil a proposal in accordance witb his requirements ?
I). First of all, it is necessary to recognize tbe great variety ofappliances whichare Covered by the design
mIes. 11 is obvious tbat a bucket-wheel reclaimer used for very high duty in a stockyaid is not designed
in tbe same manner as a small stacker for infrequent duty. Forthe latter, it may not be.necessary to
make all the verifications which would appear to be required from reading throughtbe rules, because
one would clearly finish with a volume of calculations which wQuld be totally out of proporlion to tbe
objective in view.
The manufacturer must therefore decide in each particular case which parts of the new machine, shOlild
be analysed and whichparts can be. accepted without calcuhition~This is; not because the latter would
con~vene tbe requirementsoftbemlesbut because, thecontrary, due to experience;the designer is
certain inadvance, tbat tbe calculations for the latter would' only confirrn' a favourable olitc6me., This
may be because a standard componenl is being used which has been verified once and for all or because
it has been established tbat some of the verifications imposed by the mIes cannot, in' cerlain cases,
have an unfavourable result and therefore serve no purpose.
on
-: .;'0, .
With tbe fatigue' calculations, for example, it is very easy to see that certain verifications are
unnecessary for appliances of light or moderate duty because they always lead to the conclusion tbin
the most unfavourable cases are those resulting from checking safety in relation to the e1asiic limit or
10 lhe breaking stress.
.
These considerations show tbat calculalions, made in accordance Wilh lhe mIes, can take a very
differenl forrnaccording to lhe type of appliance which is being considered, and may, in tbe case of
.. ./
1-6
FEMSection II
j
I
I..
a simple machine or a machine embodying standard components, be in the fonnof a brief summary
without prejudicing thecompliance of the machinewith the principles set out by the design rules.
2) As far as the second question is concerned, some explanation is flfstdesirable for the purchaser, who
may he somewhat bewildered by the extent of the document and confused when faced with the variety
of choice which itpresents, a variety which is, however, necessary if one wishes to take account of the
great diversity of problems tobe resolved.
In fact, the only important matter for the purchaser is to' define the duty which is to be expected from
the appliance and if possible to givesome iildication of the duty of the various individual motions.
As regards the serviceto be perfonned by the appliance, only one factor must be specified, i.e. the
class of utilization, as defined in 2-1.2.2. This gives the group in which the appliance must be ranged.
In order to obtain the number of hours which detennines theclass of utilization; the purchaser may, for
instance, find the product of :
- the average number of hours whih the appliance will be used each day,
- the average number of days of use per year,
- the number of years after which the appliance may be considered as having to be replaced.
As a general rule, the purchaser need not supply any other infonnation in connection with the design
of the appliance, except in certain cases: e.g. the value of the out-of-service wind; where local
.conditions are considered to necessitate design for an out-of-service wind greater than that defmed in
.
2-2.3.6.
SCOPE OF THERULES
'. The purpose of these mIes is todetermine the lmids and combinations of lads which must be taken into
. account when designing handling appliances,:and alsotoestablish the streilgth and stability onditionsto
t>e observedforthe variousload combinations.
FIELD OF APPLICATION
These rules are applicable to mbileequipment Cor continuous handling of bulk materiais, especially to
rail-mounted :
- staekers
shiploaders
reclaimers
combined stackersand reclaimers
- continuous ship unloaders
",
..
j
l
i.
On the basis of the c1ass of utilization of the appliance as a whoie, it is possible to determine a total
number ofworking hours for each mechanism according to the average duration of a working cycle aIrl
the. ratio between the operating time of the mechanism and the duration of the complete cycle. An
example of c1assificationof an appliance. its mechanisms and elements is given in 2-1.5.
1-4.
I!
1-3
j,
.. ./
"
1\
FEM Section TI
1-7
. .o
-:--..
It should be noted that when mobile machine includes one or several belt conveyors as conveymg
elements, the .cIauses of these design rules, insofar as they apply to the machine in qustion, are applicable.
'The selection of the conveyors should be made in accordance with the standard ISO 5048: "Continuo:s
. mechanical handling equipmeni'- Belt conveyors with carrying idlers - Calculation of operating poweraiXI
tensile forces".
~4>
.~$?~~,;
On the other hand, belt conveyors which are not part of a mobile machine are excluded from the scope.'f
these design rules.
..
....~,
:t.':~:
'1
~.
':.:
.... :
.", ..~,
.. ./
I, --
1-8
1-5
.. FEM Section II
Dimension
m2
A2 to A8
Ae
m2
BO to BlO
mm
Cf
'..:_.
\
\... ~
L..
CI. Clmax
C2, C2max
c,
mm
Dt
mm
mm
d2
mm
dt.
mm
N/mm 2
El t ES
FO
Cf
j
1.....
.. ./
FEM Section TI
Symbol
1-9
DimensIOn
,H
Hy
K - K' -K"
K'
K to K4
".
,-,
Shape coefficient
(4-1.3.3)
~.~
ksp
In
kuc
fatigue verification of
Ll to L4
mm
Nm
MI to M8
In
Nin
Nm
Nm
.'..I
1-10
FEM Section 11
,..
~
1
.{
Dimension
Symbol
Na
kN
plane in
bolted joints
;
\.
Load on wheel(4-2.4.2)
J
\.
PI to P4
PlO, PIOO
Pmean J, n, In
Pmin J, Il, In
Pmax J, I1, rn
Pa
mrn
PL
N/rnm 2
N/mm2
RO
N/nlm 2
mm
(4-2.2~1)
Smean
Smin
Smax J, U, In .
.. ./
FEM Section TI
1-11
Dimension
Symbol
oe
TO to 1'9
Ta
Tc
oe
tI. t2.
tj ... tr
Vs
m/s
Vt
m/s
VY
WO. W1, W2
ZA
ZB
Ze
.Zp
Lll1
mm
Lll2
mm
Lls
mm
11
'.
:;.
......
~""
e
e
l(
.. ./
1-12
Symbol
Dimension
FEM Section 1I
J.1
vE
vR
vK
, -
r -
kglm 3
Air density
<J
N/mm 2
.<JE
N/mm 2
<JR
N/mm 2
E
<JR
N/mm 2
<Ja
N/mm 2
<Jaw
N/mm 2
<Jcg
N/mm 2
<Jep
N/mm 2
N/mm 2
ta
N/mm 2
taw
N/mm 2
. The
<J>
<p, <p'
'"
(J)
-000-
,.
Chapter 2
FEM Section 11
CHAPTER 2
CLASSIFICATION AND' LOAI>ING OF STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS
CONTENTS
Clause
Classification of components
Classification system
Classes of utilization for components
Stress spectrum
Group c1assification of components
Harmonization of c1assification for the complete machine, complete
mechanisms and components (structure and mechanisms)
Complete machine
Complete mechanisms
Components
- Structural component groups
- Mechanical component groups
An example of the classification of a machine and ls components
Main loads
Dead loads
Material loads
- Materialload carried on the conveyors
- Loads in the reclaiming devices
- Material in the hoppers
Incrustation
Normal tangential and lateral digging forces
Forces on the conveyor(s)
Permanent dynamic effects
Loads due to inclination of the working level
Page
2-1
2-3
2-1.1
2-3
2-1.2
2-1.2.1
2-1.2.2
2-1.2.3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-4
2-1.3
2-1.3.1
2-1.3.2
2-1.3.3
2-1.3.4
2-4
2-4
2-4
2-5
2-7
2-8
2-1.3~5
2-1.4
2- 1.4.1
2~1.4.2
2-1.4.3
2-1.4.4
2-1.5
2-1.5.1
2-1.5.2
2- 1.5.3
2-1.5.3.1
2-1.5.3:2
. 2-1.5.4
2-2
2-2.1
2-2.1.1
2-2.1.2
2-2.1.2.1
2-2.1.2.2
2-2.1.2.3
2-2.1.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.5
2-2.1.6
2-2.1.7
2-8
2-8
2-8
2-9
2-11'
2-12
2-12
: 2-12
2-12
2-13
2-13
2-14
2-18
2-19
2-19
2-19
2-19
2-21
2-21
2-22
. 2-22
2-23
2-23
2-23
.. ,1
FEM Section
. Additionalloads
Wind acticin
Aerodynamic wind pressure
- In service wind
- Wind load ca1culations
- Shape and shie1ding coefficients
Snow and ice loads
Temperarure
Abnormal tangential and lateral digging forces
Beanng friction and rolling resistances
Reaction perpendicular to the rail due to travelling of the applince
Non-permanent dynamic effects
2-2.2
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.1.1
2-2.2.1.2
2-2.2.1.3
2-2.2.1.4
2-2.2.2
2-2.2.3
2-2.2.4
2-2.2.5
2-2.2.6
2-2.2.7
2-24
2-24
2-24
2-24
2-25
2-27
2-32
2-33
2-33
2-33
2-34
2-34
2-2.3
2-2.3.1
2-2.3.2
2-2.3.3
2-2.3.4
2-2.3.5
2-2.3.6
2-2.3.7
2-2.3.8
2-2.3.9
2-35
2-35
2-35
2-35
2-35
2-36
2-36
2-37
2-37
2-37
2-3
2-38
2-3.1
2-38
2-4
2-40
- General information
Loads definition
- Friction resistances
2-4.1
2-4.2
2-4.2.1
2-40
2-40
2-40
2-5
2-41
2-5.1
2-41
Specialloads
Clogging of chutes
Resting of the reclaiming device or the boom
Failure of load limiting devices as in paragraph 2-2.1.2.1
Blocking oftravelling devices
Lateral collision with the slope in case of bucket-wheel machines
Wind load on machines out of service
Buffer effects
Loads due to earthquakes
Loads during erection (or dismantling) of the machine
...
.. ./
.,
. FEM Section II
2-1
2-3
.../
2-4
FEM Section II
Complete mechanical handling machines are most commonly c1assified in groups A4 to Ag.
Table T.2-1.2.2
GROUPS FOR HANDLING MACHINES
I 600
3 200
6 300
12 500
25 000
50 000
-<
<
<
<
<
<
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
GROUP Symbol :
::;
::;
5
5.
5
5
1600
Al
3200
6 300
12 500
25 000
50 000
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
AS
. .. ./
FEM Section II
2-5
The total duration of use ()f a mechanism is a calculated duration considered as a guide value and
takes into account the fact that the mechanism may be designed to be replaced a number of times in
the totallife of the machine.
The total diJration of use of a mechanism is expressed in tenns of hours. T. calculated on the basis
of the average number of service hours/day. the number of actual service days/year and the required
duration in terms of years before replacement.
On this basis. we have ten classes of utilization. TO. Tl, T2... T9, the most common classes
being T3 to T9. They are defined in table T.2-1.3.2.
Table T.2-1.3.2
CLASSES OF UTILIZATION
Utilization class
symbol
'Totalduration ofuse T
(h)
TO
Tl
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
Tl
T8
T9
1
3
6
12
25
50
200
400
800
600
200
300
500
000
000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
::;
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
::;
::;
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
3
6
12
25
50
200
400,
800
600
200
300
500
000
000
The loading spectrum factor characterizes the magnitude ofthe loads acting on a mechariism during
its total duration of use. There is a distribution function, expressing the fraction of the total
duration of use (see table T.2-1.3.2) for which the mechanism is subjected to a load attaining a
fraction of the maximum rated load.
An example of a loading spectrum is given in figures 2-1.3.3.1 a and b.
.../
2-6
FEM Section TI
--
----
1,0
0.8
"
cv
o
Q.7S
_t_
-5
-6
"-
--
----
-)
-2
_1
Figure 2-1.3.3.1 a.
Figure 2- 1.3.3.1 b.
Si
= loading
Smax = maximum admissible load
ti
= duration for which the loading is at least equal to Si
T
= total duratin of use
dl
km--f (~)d
Smax
.T
o
For the purposes of group classification. exponent d is taken by convention as equal to 3.
In many applicationsthe function Set) may be approximated by a function consisting of a certain
number of steps r (see fig. 2-1.3.3.2). of respective durations tI. t2 ... tr for which the loadings
may be considered as practically constant and equal to Si during the durationti. lf T representsthe
total duration of use and Smax the greatest of the loadings SI. S2 ... Sr. there exists a relation :
r
ti
+ t 2 + ... :- t r = I,
ti
=T
;=1
.. ./
FEM Section II
2-7
.~
T
t51
1,0
;"\
fS2
~ 15 3
O,L
------ Sr
0..1
:.
~1
-t.
, ,
---- -
/\"'\.
tl
---
T ,.
'.
-..J
~r
TTT
T
Fig. 2-1.3.3.2
Depending on its Iaading spectrum. a mechanism is placed in one of the four spectrum classes L1.
L2. L3, L4, defined in table T.2-1.3.3,the most common classes generally being L3 and L4 for
the niain mechanisms.
Table T.2-I.3.3
SPECTRUM CLASSES
Spectrum class
symbol
Spectrum factor km
Ll
'. km
s;
0.125
L2
0.125
<
km
S;
0.250
L3
0.250
<
km
0.500
L4
0.500
<
km
1.000
2-1.3.4 GROUPCLASSIFICATION
MECHANI8MS
OF
COMPLETE
INDIVIDUAL
Depending on their claSs of utilization and spectrum class. completeindividual mechanisms are
classified in one of the eight groups MI. M2..... M8, defined in table T.2-1.3.4. Thegroups
generally chosen for the main mechanisms are M4 to M8, a result of the commonly selected
c{asses of utilization and spectrum factors.
.../
. 2-8
FEM Section II
Table T.2-U.4 .
MECHANISM GROUPS
Class of load
spectrum
Ll
L2
L3
L4
Class of utilization
T
TI
TI
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
MI
MI
MI
M2
MI
MI
MI
M2
M3
M4
M2
M3
M3
M4
M4
M5
M5
M6
M6
M7
M7
M8
M8
M8
M4 M5
M5 .M6
M6
M7
M7
M8
M8
M8
M8
M8
M8
M8
Mi
M3
OF
COMPLETE
Slnce appliances of the same type may be used in a wide variety of ways, according to the method
of working for instance, it is not really possible to pre-detennine the group of a mechanism
exactly.
The c1assification possibilities are particularly wide for mechanisms which can be either working
mechanisms or only positioning mechanisms.
Further discussion relating to the harmonization of classes and groups is given in chapter 2- 1.5,
along with a typical example ofclassification of a machine and its components.
The total duration of use of a component is a caIculated duration, considered as a guide value and
. taking into account the fact that the component may be designed to be replaced a number of times
in the total life ofthe machine.
.. ./
FEM Section II
2-9
In the case of structural components the number of stress cycles is proporlional to the. number of .
typical handling sequences. Cerlain components may be subjected to several stress cycles during a
.iypical sequence depending on their position in the structure. Hense the ratio in question may differ
from one component to another. Once this ratio is known, the total duration of use for lhe
component is derived from the total duralion of use delermined by the class of ulilizalion of lhe
applianee.
For mechanical components, the tmal duration of use is derived fromthe tolal duralion of use of lhe
mechanism to which that particular component belongs taking into account its speed of rmation
andJor other circumstances affecting its operation.
Based on this total duralion of use, we have eleven classes of ulilization, designaled respeclively by
the symbols BO, BI, ..., BlO. They are defined in table T.2-1.4.2. The most usual classes are B5
to BlO for the main components.
Table T.2-1.4.2
CLASSES OF UTILIZAnON
Utilizalion class
symbl
BO
BI
'B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
BlO
16000
32000
63000
125000
250000
500 000
1 000 000
2 000 000
4 000 000
8 000 000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
N
N
N
N
.N
N
N
N
N
N
N
16000
000
63000
125000
250000
500000
3~
$
$
~
~
.5
5
5
5
1
2
4
8
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
.. ./
2-10
FEM Section II
=f ( o(n) ) c
p
max
o
dn
'N
Wherein the exponent c is dependant onthe properties of the material concerned, the shape and size
of the component, its surface roughness and its degree of exposure tO corrosion.
- For structural components : unless otherwise specified, the value of c should normally be taken
as 3 for welded pans. Higher values for some configurations may be used in some
circumstances, but these should be used with care.
- For mechanical components : the calculation of c values
Annex AA-1.3.
IS
given
In
In many applications the function cr(n) may be approximated by a function consisting of a certain
may be
number r of steps, comprising respectively nl, n2, ... , nr stress cycles; the stress
considered as practically constant and equal to 0i during ni cycles. If N represents the total number
. of cycles and 0max the greatest of the stresses I, 02, ..., or , there exists a relation :
with n l
+ n 2 + ... + n r =
nj = N
j=1
nj
N
in which summation is truncated for the first rii ~ 2.106 This ni is taken as nr and replaced by
nr = 2.10 6 cycles.
Depending on ls stress spectrllm, a component is placed in one of the spectrum classes PI, P2,
P3, P4, defined in table T.2-IA.3, the most usual classes being P3 and P4 for main components.
Table T.2-IA.3
SPECTRUM CLASSES
Spectrum class
symbol
PI
ksp
0.125
<
ksp
0.250
P2
0.125
P3
0.250
<
k sp
0.500
P4
0.500
<
k sp
1.000
.. ./
FEM Section II
2-11
For structural components, the stresses to be taken into consideration for determination of the
spectrum factor are tbe differences 0sup - om between the upper stresses 0sup and the average
stress om, these concepts being defined by fig. 2-1.4.3 representing the variation of the stress
over time during five stress cycles.
o-f--------l,r-/----:----=-.I-o
sup
. 0sup max
Osup min
oii
Om
=
=
=
=
=
"-.l.-...L-_ _
upper stress
maximum upper stress
minimum upper stress
lower stress
arithrnetic mean of all upper and lower stresses during the total duration of use
- In the case of mechanical components, om canbe assumed to be zero and the stresses introduced
into the caIculation of the spectrum factor are then the totaI stresses occumng in the relevant
section of the component.
Note : Stress changes with values Iess than 10 % of tbe maximum stress are not to be considered
for the caIculation of.the spectrum factor for structural or mechanical components.
These small stress changes, as proved by experience, have no noticeable effect on the working life.
.../
2-12
FEM Section II
Considering the most common Classes of utilization and stress spectrum classes, the groups
generally used for main components are ES to E8.
Table T.2-IAA
COMPONENT GROUPS
Stress
spectrum
c1ass
PI
P2
P3
P4
Class of utilization
BO
BI
B2 .
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
BB
B9
BlO
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
E2
El
El
E2
E3
El
E2
E3
E4
E2
E3
E4
ES
E3
E4
E4
ES
ES
E6
E6
E7
E7
E8
E8'
E8
E5
E6
E6
E7
E7
EB
EB
EB
EB
EB
EB
EB
2-1.5.3 COMPONENTS
The groups for structural or mechanical components are determined as follows :
.. ./
FEM Section 11
2-13
It is not possible to give a genera! method for detennining the number of stress cycles F for a
mechanicalcomponent, as the number of stress cycles greatly depends upon the type of load and the
function of the component in a given mechanisln.
This applies to mechanism elements which, for each operating cycle, undergo stress variations
corresponding to a certain multiple of the operating cycli::, for example, carriage wheel axles,
slewing bearings for rotating pans of the unit.'
.
where:
Sp
ka
the factor by which the number of operating cycles is multiplied when the mechanism
element is subjected to several stress cycles for each operating cycle.
Exgm12l~
carriage wheel axle of a reclaiming unit where one working cycle includes the following
movements :
.. ./
2-14
FEM Section II
In this case: ka =2, for a fixed axle as the stress changes only when the boom is slewed.
This group contains all rotating mechanism parts wlUch are stressed by rotating-bending and
shearing stresses. It also applies to the bending and Hertzian stresses on toothed geats.
In these cases:
Fh
=ka . nm
. 60
where:
nm
For the Hertzianstress of toothed gears, whose flanks are used on both sides, e.g. under-carriages or
slewing mechanisms, it shall be considered :
ka =0.5
From the number of stress cyc1es to wlUch the mechanical component will be subjected, a class of
utilization (Ba to BlO) can be detennined. This is used, along with the spectrum class (PI to P4),
tQ select the component group (El 10 E8).
In tlUs manner, all components or sets of components are classified in GROUPS representing the
anticipated service to be provided by those components.
Ore handling :
eoal handling :
Desired duration of use : 50,000 hours, i.e. GROUP A7 for the machine as a whoie.
../
FEMSectiori II
2-15
From these parameters it can be calculated that the machine will be used in the following way :
=
=
Ore stacking
Coal stacking
Ore reclaiming
Coal reclaiming
=
=
10,500 h
7,900 h
15,800 h
15,800'h
50,000 h
approx.
approx.
approx.
approx.
(31.5
(15.8
(31.5
(15.8
Mt)
Mi)
Mt)
Mt)
Total duration
ofuse
(h)
Class of
utilization
Reclaiming
unit
31,600
T8
Boom
conveyor
50,000
Siewing
Mechanism.
Lifting
Travelling
Spectrum
c1ass
GROUP
i.e. 0.76
L4
M8
T8
i.e. 0.45
L3 *(4)
M8
33,500
*(1)
T8
i.e. 0.80
L4
M8
5,000
T5
i.e. 1
L4
M7
12,500
* (2)
T6
i.e. '1
L4
M8
*(1) Assuming:
+
*(2) Assuming:
Spectrum
factor
km * (3)
31,600 h
1,900 h
7,900 h
1,100 h
.3,200 h
TOTAL:
roundedto
*(3) Spectrum factors must be calculated on the basis of the loads applied during the whole or
relevant parts of the four main service phase~, j.e. ore stacking, coal stacking, are reclaiming,
.
coal reclaiming.
.. ./
2-16
FEM Section II
For the reclaiming unit for instance, if the loads created by coal reIaiming amount t080 %
of the loads created by ore reciaiming (corresponding to a maximum laad) for equal serVice
times for ?re and coaI, factor km wiII be O.S + 0.8 3 O.S = 0.76 approx.
It should be noted that the most common spectrum cIass for these appliances is cIass L4.
*(4) Assuming a reversible boom conveyor, the different duration of utilization in relation to the
total duration of utilization of the machine wiII be as follows :
storage of iron ore
storage of coal
reciaiming of iron ore
reciaiming of coal
=
=
=
=
0.21
0.IS8
0.316
0.316
out of a total of
scheduled utilization
~ SO,OOO hours of
If we consider that the mechanism will be loaded at the maximum value of I for the storage
of iron ore, the loads on the mechanism for the threeother operations are for instance :
we have therefore :
km = 0.21. 13 + 0.IS8 . 0.74 3 + 0.316 . 0.74 3 + 0.316. O.SY
km = 0.449 and spectrum class L3
It must be noted that, for a boom conveyor with a variabie inclination it would be possible,
for each of the four kinds of utilization, to caiculate an average load for the driving
mechanism as it is obvious that the maximum loading when staking materialis supported
only when the elevation of the handled product is maximum, i.e. with the boom in the
highest position.
Nevertheless, the interest of this study appears only if it is possible to go from a stress factor
spectrum to a smaller one, which is not the case for the example above.
When chosing some components of the mechanism such as the gear box reducer,
consideration may be given to the fact that the boom conveyor is reversible, which means
that the reducer wiII be used 18,400hours driving in one direction and 31,600 hours in the
opposite direction.
.../
FEM Section 11
. 2-17
A structural componein wiJl therefore belong to a group (generally E5 10 E8) depending essentially
.
on its position in the machine.
As regards mechanica! components, it is also necessary 10 deiermine the number of stress cycles to
which each part will be subjectedduring the use of Ihe mechanism as a whoie, e.g. the slew drive
pinion can be c1assified as follows :
=
=
(according to spectrum factor of approx. 0.8, similar to spectrum factor of slewing mechanism)
hense group classificatibn E8.
.../
2-18
2-2
FEM Section II
a)
The main loads include all the permanent loads which occur when the equipment is used under normal
operating conditions.
They mainly are :
b)
dad loads,
materialloads,
incrustation,
normal tangential and lateral digging forces,
forces on the conveyor(s),
permanent dynamic effects,
inclination of the working level.
The additionalloads are loads that can occur intermillently during operation of the equipment or when the
equipment is not working ; these loads can either replace certain main loads or be addilional 10 Ihe main
loads.
1
- wind load for machine in service,
snow and ice loads,
~ climatic effects
- temperature effects,
J
- abnormal tangential and lateral digging forces,
- bearing friction and rolling resistances,
- reactions perpendicular to the rail.due to travelling (skewing effect),
non permanent dynamic effects.
c)
The special loads comprise those loads which should not occur during and outside the operation of the
equipment but the occurence of which is not to be excluded.
They include :
-
clogging of chutes,
resting of the reclaiming device or the boom,
failure ofload Iimiting devices (see 2-2.1.2.1),
blocking oftravelling devices,
lateral collision of the bucket-wheel with the slope,
wind load on machines out of service,
buffer effects,
loads due to earthquakes,
loads during erection (or dismantling) of the machine.
...I
, FEM Section Il
2-19
I)
a)
Where the belt load is limited by automatic devices, the load on the conveyor will be assumed 'to be
that which results from the capacity thus limited.
b)
Where there is no capacity limiter, the design capacity is that resulting from the maximum
equivalent cross sectional area of the material on the conveyor multiplied by the conveying speed.
Unless otherwise specified in the contract, this cross sectional area shall be determined assuming a
surcharge angle e = 20 and considering a surcharge area according to ISO 5048 "Continuous
mechanical handling equipment - Belt conveyors with carrying idlers - Calculation of operating
power and tensile forces".
'
The diagrams 2-2.1.2.1 hereafter give the 'cross' sectional area to be considered for different belt
conveyor designs.
.../
FEM Section 11
Fig. 2-2.1.2.1 - Belt conveyor cross-sections
B
b=O,9 8-0,05 m for B:::;; 2 m
b =8 - 0,25 m tor 8 > 2 m
angle 8
/)~O 9.
. L 1~
'8- 005 m for B
'
U-n'
Sur ha ge angle 8
... /
FEM Section IJ
2-21
c)
Where the design capacity resulting. from b) on the . upstream units is lwer than that of
downstream units, the downstream units may hilVe the same capacitY,as the upstream units.
2)
a)
Where there is no capacity limiter, the design volumetrie capacity shall be taken as 1.5 times the
nominal filling capacity of the buckets multiplied by the maximum number of discharges. In the
case of bucket-wheels, the factor 1.5 (which takes illlo accountthe volumes which can be filled in
addition to the buckets), can be replaced by taking inlo account the actual fill value additional to the
bucket volume.
b)
Where there are automatic capacity limiters, the designcapacity shall be the capacity th us limited.
Where the unit is to be used to convey materials of different bulk densities (for example coal and
ore) safety devices shall be provided to ensure that the calculated loads will not b exceeded with the
heavier material.
3)
for bucket-wheels :
-
b)
for bucket-chains :
- 1I3 of all the buckets in contact with the face are 33.3 % fulI,
- 1I3 of all the buckets in contact with the face are 66.7 % full,
- all other buckets up to.the sprocket are 100% full.
...I
: 2-22
FEM Section II
Where the weight of the material is limited by reliable automatic controls, -deviation from the
above-mentioned value is pennissible.
2-2.1.3 INCRUSTATION
The degree of incrustation (din accumulation) depends on the specific material and operating
conditions prevailing in each given case.
The data which followare to be taken as a guide, and are generally applicable to stockyards
machines.
For excavating equipment they are to be taken as minimum values.
Unless experience in particular cases or customer's requirements specify otherwise, the loads due to
dirt accumulation that should be taken inta account are :
a)
b)
for bucket-wheels the equivalent weight of a 5 cm thick layer of material of maximum specified
bulk density on the centre of the bucket-wheel considered as asolid disc up to the cutting circ!e,
c)
for bucket-chains 10 % of the design material load calculated according to 2-2.1.2, uniformly
distributed overthe totallength of the ladder.
a)
../
FEM Section II
2-23
- For storage yard applications, the above method of calculation may be ignored if the digging
resistance of the material is accurately known as a result of tests and if it can be guaranteed that
this digging resistance wiU not be exceeded during normal operation,
b)
a)
In general the dynamic effect of the digging resistances, the falling masses at the transfer points, the .
rotating pans ofmachinery, ihe vibrating feeders, etc, need only be considered as ading locally.
b)
The inertia forces due to acceleration and braking of moving structural parts must be taken into
account. These can be neglected for appliances working outdoors if the acceleration anddeceleration
are $ 0.2 m/s 2
If possible the drive motors and brakes must be designed in such a way that this acceleration value
0.2 rn/s 2 is not exceeded.
If the number of laad cycles caused by inertia forces due to acceleration and braking is lowe( than
4
2 x 10 during the lifetime of the machine the effects should be considered as additional loads (see
2-2.2.7).
...I
2-24
FEM Section II
P Vs
q- -2-
,.
q = 0.613 V~
.../
FEM Section II
2-25
b)
Th.is equivalent aerodynamic pressure is assumed to be applied during the whole design lifetime of
the mechanism and to cause the same wear or fatigue effects as the actual effects of service winds
whose aerodynarnic pressures wiJl vary between 0 . and the maximum working aerodynamic
pressure.
It should be noted that this equivalent aerodynamic pressure for wear calculatins corresponds to a
wind speed equalto approximately 60 % of the design maximum permissible speed of the service
wind.
c)
Start-up mustalways be possible against maximum in service wind, but it is assumed that the
operating speeds and nominalaccelerations are not necessarily reached under maximum in service
wind conditions.
ct)
Dnder certain circumstances, an appliance may have to go back, unloaded. to "out of service"
anchoring positions.. In such cases, travelling mechanisms should be dimensioned in relation .to the
maximum permissible aerodynamic wind pressures defmed in the specifications for this load case,
and dependanton the machine surface exposed to the wind. the machine may need to be placed in a
configuration designed for such transfer.
The plane of the exposed parts placed perpendicularly to the wind direction
For most complete or part structures, and individual members used in structures, the wind load is
calculated from :
F=A.q.Cf
for a wind blowing perpendicularly 10 the exposed plane of the components.
(I) Where a wind speed measuring device is 10 be allached 10 an appliance,it shall normally be placed
atthe maximum height. In cases where the wind speed at a different level is more significant to the
safety of the appliance, the manufacturer shall state the heigt at which the device shall be placed.
.. ./
2-26
FEM Section II
where:
In determining strength of the applianee and safety requireinents against overturning and drifting the
total wind load shaB be considered (see 3-6 and 3-7).
b) The plane of the exposed parts placednon perpendicularly to the wind direction (inclined boom for
instanee)
=A . q . Cf . sinz e
F.l =A . q . Cf . sin
e . cos e
- The load in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the member is the resultant of
F and F.l and is :
FN
=A . q.. Cf . sin e
fig. 2-2.2.1.3
wind
CD
c
\I)
.. ./
FEM Section II
2-27
A = area of the projected member on to a plane perpendicular to the wind direction = A'sin
Cf = is in relation with the ratio Lib or LID according to 2-2.2.1.4,
q = is given in 2-2.2.1.1.
e,
In the case of very small values ofthe angle 8 20), the calculation must be made with a
minimum value of 8 equal to 20 (to take into account unavoidable aerodynamic effects).
.Where the wind blows at an angle to the longitudinal axis of a lattice girder or tower, the wind laad
in the direction of the wind is obtained from :
F =A . q . Cf . K2
in N
K2=--~--
50 (1.7 -
~)
Where 8 is the angle of the wind in degrees to the longitudinal axis of the girdr or tower
(8 ~ 90).
Sp is the area in m 2 of the bracing members of the girder or tower projecled on to ils windward
plane.
S is the area in m 2 of all (bracing and main) members of the girder or tower projected on to its
windwardplane.
The value of K2 is assumed to have lower and upper limits of 0.35 and 1.0 respectively. It is taken
0.35 whenever the calculated v?lue < 0.35 and as 1.0 whenever the calculated value > l.O.
.../
2-28
FEM Section II
The wind load on single lattice girders may be calculated on the basis of the coefficients for the
individual members given in the top part of table T.2-2.2.1.4.L In this case the aerodynamic
slendrness of each member shall be taken into account. Alternatively the overall coefficients for
lattice girders constructed of flat sided and circular sections given in the middle part of the table may
be used.
Where a lattice girder is made up of flat-sided or circular sections. or of circular sections in both
flow regimes (D . V s < 6 m 2 /s and D . V s ~ 6riJ 2/s) the appropriate shape coefficients are
applied to the corresponding frntal areas.
Where gusset plates of normal size are used in welded lattice construction no allowance for the
additional area presented by the plates is necessary, provided the lengths of individual members are
taken between the centres of node points.
Shape coefficients obtained from wind-tunnel or fullcscale tests mayalso be used.
.../
FEM Section II
2-29
,
T.2-2.2.lA.l
SHAPE COEFFICIENTS
. Type
Description
<5
> 50
1.15
1.15
1.3
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.60
Rectangular hollow
sections up to 356 mm
square
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.6
1.05
1.05
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
. 1.30
1.35
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.80
1.80
0.60,
0.60
0.70
0.65
0.80
0.70
0.85
0.70
0.90
0.75
0.90
0.80
0.90
0.80
U5
1.40
1.0
0.80
1.75
1.55
1.20
0.90
1.95
1.75
1.30'
0.90
2.10
1.85
1.35
1.0
2.20
1.90
1.40
1.0
Rolled sections J]
Other sections
Individual
rriembers
Circular seclionswhere
D.V s < 6 m 2/s
D.V s ~ 6 m 2/s
Rectangular
hollow sections
over 356 mm
square and
254 x 457 mm
reclangular
Wind
bid
1
2
0.5
0.25
i:
- - --+
Single
laltice
girders
. Machinery
houses
etc.
F1at-sided sections
1.60
1.10
0.80 .
Closed rctangular
'structures
1.30
.. .I
2-30
FEM Section II
Figure 2-2.2.1.4.2
DEFlNITIONS: AERODYNAMIC SLENDERNESS. SOLIDITY RATIO. SPACING RATIO
AND SECTION RATIO
(1) Aerodynamicslenderness =
Iength of member
breadth of section across wind front
* In Iattice construction the lengths of individual members are taken between the centres of
adjacent node points, See diagram below.
( IJ)
lid'
.
area of solid parts
A ~ li' bi
S0 lty ratIo =
= - = L..J - enclosed area
Ae
I
L.B
lD
a
b
or
for "a" take the smallest possible value in the geometry of the exposed face.
b
(IV) Sectin ratio =breadth of section across wind front
depth of section parallel to wind flow = d
../
FEM SectiOll II
b)
2-31
Table T.2-2.2.1.4.3
SHIELDING COEFFICIENTS TJ
Spacing ratio
aIb
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
0.75
0.92
0.95
I
1
I
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.75
0.8
0.88
0.95
I
0.32
0.59
0.63
0.76
0.88
I
0.21
0.43
0.5
0.66
0.81
I
0.15
0.25
0:33
0.55
0.75
]
0.6
0.1
O. I
0.2
0.45
0.68
I
Where a number of identical girders or members are spaced equidistantly behind each other in such a
way that each girder shields those behind it, the shiedling effect is assumed to increase up to the
ninth girder and to remain constant thereafter. The wind loads are calcu]ated as follows :
FI
F2 =
Fn
A.q.Cf
in N
TJ.A.q.Cf
in N
TJ(n-l).A.q.Cf
in N
in N
Fto ta ]
= [I
,1-11
= A.q.Cf~)
in N
.. ./
FEM Section II
2-32
Where there are more than 9 girders Ftotal
- 11
in N
Note :
The tenn 11 x used in the above fonnula is assumed to have a lower limit of 0.10. It is taken as
when ever
o. IO
Lattice towers
For calculating the "face-on" wind laad on square towers in the absence of a detailed calculation, the
solid area of the windward face is multiplied by the following overall force coefficient :
1.1.(1 +11)
IA
=1
The maximum wind laad on a square tower occurs when the wind blows on to a corner. In the
absence of a detailed calculation, this load can be considered as 1.2 times that developed with
"face-on" wind on one side.
In
the
For machines in areas with severe c1imatic conditions, or where specified by the purchaser,
consideration should be given to the additionalloads arising from snow and ice.
...I
FEM Section 11
2-33
2 - 2.2.3 TEM,PERATURE
Temperature effects need only by considered in special cases, e.g. for areas with extreme c1imatic
conditions or when using materials with different expansion coefficients within the same
component that are not free to expand or contract separately.
a)
b)
If the wheel or chain is loaded according to 2-2.1.2.2, in this case the digging power can be reduced
by the power required to lift and/or move the material.
The abnormal lateral digging force is calculated as in 2-2.1.4.2 (b) thereby considering a load of
0.3 times the abnormal tangential digging force.
If appropriate, this load can be calculated from the working torque of an existing cut-out device of
the slewing or tra velling mechanism and which should be at least equal to 1.1 times the sum of the
torques due to the inclination of the machine (see 2-2.i.7) and to wind load for machines in
operation, (see, 2-2.2.1.2).
Where a torque limit device is installed on the slewing mechanism, the mechanism 'must he
equipped with a locking device preventing the slewing part rotating when out of service (due to
wind force) if this rotation is dangerous.
Frictional forces need only to he calculated where they influence the size of structural components.
Following friction coefficient can be usedin default of more precise values based on suppliers'
specifications :
- for pivots and bali bearings
- for structural parts with sliding friction
- on wheels of rail-mounted machines
- on wheels of crawler-mounted machines
- between plate base and ground (crawler, shiftable conveyors)
11.=0.10
11 = 0.25
11
0.03
11=0.10
11 = 0.60
.. ./
2-34
FEM Section II
2-2.2.6 REACTION
PERPENDICULAR
TO THE RAIL
DUE
TRAVELLING OF THE APPLIANCE (LOAD CAUSED
SKEWING)
TO
BY
For appliances on rails account must be taken of the reactions resulting from the traveJling
movement orthe unit under a skewing angle, giving rise to a horizontal guide force Hy directed
perpendicularly to the rail.
The force Hy can act on any guiding device (flange of wheel or separate guiding wheel) and is in
equilibrium with the horizontal friction farces acting between wheels and rails.
To calculate the force Hy the relevant system properties shaJl be taken into account (see ISO 8686
clause 6.2.2 and annex F).
Hy = 0.2. Vy
If the inertia forces are such that they have .la be taken into account, the wind effect can. be
disregarded.
Note: As these farces are; in practice, present at the same time as the wind effects, it must be
nated that actual accelerating and braking times are not the same as when stiJl conditions prevail.
.. .I
FEM Section II
2-35
in the case of appliances without reclaiming device according to paragraph I) (b), of item
2-2.1.2.1,
b) in the case of appliances with built-in reclaiming device according to paragraph 2) (a), of item
2-2.1.2.1.
For this purpose account need not be taken of Jhedynamic factor l.I.
.../
3.5
FEM Section 1I
2-36
In the ~ase of gantry with large rails center distance, equipped with special devices to check the
respective displacement on both sides of the travelling mechanism, the calculation wiJ] be made
taking into account the maximum possible difference on the position of bogies allowed by these
special devices.
'
In
out of
,It must be noted that, in this out of service position, the machine eventually need to be placed in a
special parking area, in a defined position (boom orientation for instance) and could require the use
of special devices such as rail clamps, anchors, ...
The wind speed varies with the height above the surrounding level, and the, geographical Jocation.
The wind load on ihe apparatus depends also on the degree of exposure to the prevailing winds.
For calculation and unJess specified otherwise for handJing appliances used in the open air the
aerodynamic wind pressures to be used and the corresponding speeds, for "out of service" conditions
are indicated in the table T.2-2.3,6.
Table t.2-2.3.6
OUT OF SERVICE AERODYNAMIC WIND PRESSURE
Height above
surrounding
level
m
to
0
20
to
more than
.20
100
100
Out of service
aerodynamic wind
pressure q
N/m 2
800
1,100
1,300
Approximate equivalent
.out of service design
wind speed
mis
km/h
36
42
46
130
150
165
When calculating wind loads for out of service conditions the aerodynamic wind pressure shall he
taken as constant over the venical height intervals in table T.2-2.3.6~
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
2-37
or
The supplier shall be advised of this requirement by the user of 'the installation who shalJ also
provide the corresponding seismic spectra.
ERECTION
(OR
DISMANTLING)
OF
THE
In genera\, the loads during erection are less than they will be for the machine in operation.
Nevertheless, in some particular situations, according to the erection process, it can be necessary to
check some structural (or mechanical) parts for a certain stage of the erection.
The checking is made by taking into account the actual supporting conditions and ihe eventual
anchorages of the given structural part.
.
The pennissible stIesses are:
stress alJowed in case I for no wind condition
- stress allowed in case III for out of service wind condition.
.../
2-38
2-3
FEM Seclion II
. ./
*
*
* (I)
. ..................
*
*
*
*
*
*
. .....
C ....
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* (2)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Loads during
erection
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
the mechanism must be equipped witha locking device preventing the sJewing part from roiating (due to wind force), when out of service, if this rotation is dangerous.
...................
................... ...................
................... ....................
................... ...................
,
................... . ..................
................... ...................
................... ...................
...................
*
...................
*
...................
*(1 )
...................
*
................... ...................
................... ....................
...................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Main and
additionalloads
case 11
(2)
Dead loaels........................................
Material leads on conveyors, reclaiming
devices and hoppers............................
Incrustation ......................................
Norma! tangential and lateral digging
forces ..............................................
Forces on the conveying elements ........
Permanent dynamic effects ..................
Loads due to inclination of working
.Ievel ... :...........................................
Wind force during service ....................
Snow and ice (possibly)......................
.Temperature (possibly) .......................
AbnormaJ tangentiaJ and lateral digging
forces ..............................................
Resistances due to friction and travel ......
Reactions perpendicuJartothe rail ........
Non-permanent dynarnic effects ............
Chute blocking .................................
Bucket-wheel resting ..........................
Failure of laad Iimiting devices (see
2-2.1.2. I) ........................................
Travelling device blocking ..................
Lateral collision with the slope (bucketwheel) .............................................
Wind force out of service ....................
Buffer effects ....................................
.Earthquake loads................................
Loaels during erection .........................
case I
Main loads
(I)
2-2.3.6
2-2.3.7
2-2.3.8
2-2.3.9
2-2.3.4
2-2.3.5
2-2.3.3
2-2.3.2
2-2.2.7
2-2.3.1
2~2.2.6
2-2.2.5
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.2
2-2.2.3
2-2.2.4
2-2. J.5
2-2.1.6
2-2.1.7
2-2.1.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.1
2-2.1.2
Items
Table T.2-3.1
LOAD COMBINATrONS
NI
\0
t:::l
::l
a~
en
2-40
2-4
FEM Section II
2-4.2LOADS DEFINITION
In general the loads dealt with in articles 2-2: 1,2-2.2 and 2-2.3 in the "structuren chapter as weil as certain
loads defined further on shall be taken into account in the various load combinations.
2-4.2.1
FRICTION RESISTANCES
Resistances induces by friction should be calculated by taking into account the maximum friction
coefficients when defining a drive mechanism and the minimum friction coefficient when defining braking
devices.
The following friction coefficients can be used :
- for (roller or bali) slewing bearings
- for pivots plain bearings
- -for rail wheels
. with bali or roller bearings
. with plain bearings
- on wheels of crawler machines
- between plate base and ground (crawler, shiftabIe conveyors)
0.005
~ ~ ~
0.01
0.1
~:::
0.005 :;;
0.01 ::;;
~
~
:;; 0.01
::;; 0.03
~ = 0.1
~ = 0.6
.:./
FEM Section II
2-5
2-41
Load combinations in which additionaJ or special loads, which may arise occasionally, are taken into
account (in service or out of service):
.. ./
2-42
FEM Section II
. Table T.2-S.1.1
Mechanism or
mechanism parts
reclaiming unit
mechanism
Loads
Case I
2-2.1.1
deadloads
2-2.1.2.2 materialloads in reclaiming
device
2-2.1.3
incrustation
2-2.1.4
normal tangential and lateral
digging forces
2-2.1.S
tension of bucket-chain, beIt,...
friction resistance of the
material between the bucketwheel or bucket-chain and the
chute
2-2.2.4
abnormal tangential and lateral
digging forces
2-2.3.2
resting of bucket-wheel or chain
on ground or face
2-2.3.S
lateral collision of bucket-wheel
with the slope
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2-2.1.1
2-2.1.2.1
belt conveyor
mechanism
deadloads
materialloads on conveyor
(without dynamic coefficient)
belt conveyor motion
resistances (according to
ISO S048)
2-2~ I.S
belt tension (according to
ISO S048)
2-2.3.3
abnormal materialloads on
conveyors (without dynamic
coefficient) arising from failure
of load limiting devices as in
2-2.1.2.1 )
if the output and elevation vary, take this
into account when calculating the fatigue
strength
Case 11
x (*)
x
x
x
x
x-
x
x (*)
../
FEM Section II
2-43
Table T.2-S.1.2
SLEWlNG MECHANISM
Case IJ
Part of the
mechanism
Loads
working
2~2.1.1
2-2.1.2
2-2.1.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.7
2-2.1.6
supporting
components
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.4
2-2.3.6
2-2.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.6
drive 'components
(driving unit and
ring gear)
2-2.1.7
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.1
2-2.3.6
2-4.2.1
Note(l): '
Case I
dead loads
materialloads (without dymimic
factor)
incrustation (without dynamic
factor)
normal tangential and lateral
digging forces
loads due to inclination of the
working level
permanentdynarrilc
1*
effects
~
in service wind:
I
q in N/m 2
(l) (3) J
take the least favourable load
abnormal tangential and lateral
digging forces
wind load on machine out of
service
(I) (3)
specialloads (when working) :
2-2.3.1, 2-2.3.2, 2-2.3.3,
2-2.3.4, 2-2.3.S, 2-2.3.7,
2-2.3.8 (take the load giving the
least favourable combination)
nonnal tangential and lateral
digging forces
permanent dynarrilc effects
(forces due to acceleration and
braking - slewing motion)
loads due to inclination of the
working level
.
in service wind :q/3 N/m 2
in service wind: q in N/m 2 (l)
(3)
wind load on machine out of
service
(I) (3)
friction resistances
nOl
working
x
x
x
(2)
x
(2)
x
,x
x
x
x
Note (2) :
where a torque limit device is installed the loads when working are limited to the
adjustment of the torque limiter, which will be at a minimum eql!aJ to the
following values :
- if there is a separate locking device for the slewing part:
l.l (2-2.1.7 + 2-2.2.1) .
if there is no separate locking device and where a lock is to be effected by the
brake of the driving unit:
l.l (2-2.1.7 + 2-2.3.6)
Note (3) :
to take into account the non uniform, aerodynarrilc pressure of the wind on the
total area of the machine, wind force will be decreased by SO % on one side of
the slewing axis when calculation is least favourable.
.../
2-44
FEM Section II
Table T.2-5.1.3
TRAVELLING MECHANISM (ON RAILS OR CRAWLERS)
Case IJ
Part of the
mechanism
Loads
2-2.1.1
2-2.1.2
2-2.1.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.7
supporting
2-2.2.1
components
2-2.2.5
(wheels, pins
equalizers,...)
2-2.2.6
2-2.3.6
2-2.3
dead loads
materialloads (without dynamie
factor)
incrustation (without dynamic
factor)
normaltangential and latral
digging forces
loads due to inclination of the
working level
in service wind:
(1)
q in N/m 2
bearing friction and rolling
resistances
reactions perpendicular to the
rail due to movement of
appliance
wind load on machine out of
(1)
service
specialloads (when working) :
2-2.3.1, 2-2.3.2, 2-2.3.3,
2-2.3.4, 2-2.3.5, 2-2.3.7,
2~2.3.8 (take the load giving the
least favourable combination)
Case I
working
nol
working
x
x
(3)
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.6
ploving
components
(driving unit)
2-2.1.7
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.6
2-2.3.4
2-2.3.6
2-4.2.1
x
x
x
x (2)
x
x
Note (1) :
Note (2) :
Note (3) :
in the out of service situation, the brake of the driving unit and (eventually) the
locking device (rail clamp for instance) have to prevent the machine from
.
drifting (see 3-7).'
../
FEM Section II
2-45
Table 2-5.1.4
LUFFING MECHANISM
. Case II
Mechanism
Loads
Case I
workinf!
2-2.1.1
2-2.1.2
(cabie winding
mechanisms,
hydraulic lifting
mechanisms,
screw lifting
mechanisms)
2-2.1.3
2-2.1.4
2-2.1.6
2-2.1.7
2-2.2.1
2-2.2.4
2-2.3.6
2-2.3
2-4.2.1
Note(l) :
deadloads
materialloads (without dynamic
coefficient)
incrustation
normaltangenlial and lateral
digging forces
penrianent dynamic effets
inclination of the working level
wind in operation :
q in N/m 2
(I)
abnormaltangential and lateral
digging forces
wind out of service
(I)
specialloads (when working) :
2-2.3.1, 2-2.3.2, 2-2.3.3 (take
the load giving the least
favourable combination)
friction resistances
x
x
x
nol
working
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
In some circumslances, the case 11 working load combination may be reslricled by load limiting
devices (to be noted that machine must stay stable, but, under overload, boom may descend after
the limiting device has taken action).
Where there is no such device, as when the machine is oul of service, lhe leasl favourable load
combination musl be considered.
Nole: Precaulions 10 be taken in the event of the failure of load limiling devices shall he
specified by the manufaclurer (see chapter 5 : "Safety").
-000-
..
Chapter 3
FEM Section II
CHAPTER 3
CALCULATING THE STRESSES IN STRUCTUims
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SELECTION OF STEEL TO RESIST BRITTLE FRACTURE
3-1
3-4
3-1. I
3-4
3-1.1.1
3-1.1.2
3-1.1.3
3-6
3-7
3-1.2
3-7
Quality of steels
Special rules
3-3
Welded joints
Weid qualities
Maximum permissible stresses
Complementary information on stresses in welded joints
Bolted joints
Genera!
- Definitions
- Design
- Controlled tightening
- Maximum permissible stress
Ordinary bolts
- Definitions
- Application
Higher grade bolts :precision bolts
- Precision bolts in tension
- Precision bolts in shear
- Precision bolts in combined tension and shear
- Precision bolts in bearing
- Permissible working stresses for bolts
3-4
3-8
3-1.4
3-10
3-2
3-2. I
3-2.1. I
3-1 I
3-i 1.3
3-1 I
3-12
3-12
3-2.2
3-2.2. I
3-14
3-14
. 3-2.2.2
3-15
3-16
3-2.1.2
3-2.2.3
3-2.3
3-2.3.1
3-2.3.1.1
3-2.3.1.2
3-2.3.1.3
3-2.3.1.4
3-2.3.2
3-2.3.2.1
3-2.3.2.2
3-2.3.3
3-2.3.3. I
3-2.3.3.2
3-2.3.3.3
3-2.3.3.4
3-2.3.3.5
3-18
3-18
3-18
3-18
3-20
3-20
3-21
3-21
3-21
3~21
3-21
3-24
.3-25
3-25
3-27
.. ./
FEM Section II
High tensile steel bolts with controlled tightening for friction grip joints
- General
- External loads acting in the plane of the joint (type T)
- External loads acting perpendicular to the plane of the joint (type N)
- Joints with external force couple (type M)
- Combined external loadings on friction grip joints
3-2.3.4
3-2.3.4.1
3-2.3.4.2
3-2.3.4.3
3-2.3.4.4
3-2.3.4.5
3-28
3-28
3-30
3-32
3-32
3-32
3-2.4
3-37
3-3
3-38
3-3.1
3-3.2
3-3.3
3-38
3-43
3-43
3-4
3-52
3-4.1
3-52
3-4.2
3-52
3-4.3
3-53
- Ratio
3-4.4
3-53
3-4.5
3-4.5.1
3-4.5.1.1
3-4.5.1.2
3-4.5.1.3
3-4.5.2
3-4.5.2.1
3-4.5.2.2
3-4.5.2.3
3-4.5.3
3-54
3-54
3-54
3-56
3-56
3-59
3-59
3-59
3-62
3-72
3-5
3-80
3-6
3-81
3-6.1
3-6.2
3-81
3-82
3-7
3-83
IC
FEM Section II
3-3
INTRODUCTION .
'Jbe stresses set up in the various structural members are detenruned for the three load cases defrned in
section 2-3, and a check is made to ensure that, when compared with the critical stresses, the factor of
safety v is adequate for the following three possible causes of failure :
- exceeding the elastic limit,
- exceeding the critical crippling or buckling load,
- and, eventually, exceeding the limit of endurance to faligue.
The grade of the steel used must be stated and the physical properties, chemical composition and
weldability must be guaranteed by the manufacturer of the material.
The permissible stresses for the materials used should be detenruned as stipuhted in c1auses 3-2, 3-3. 3-4
and 3-5 hereunder, based on the critical stresses for the material.
The critical stresses are those which correspond either to the elastic limit or the stress corresponding to the
criticallimit for elongation as appropriate, or to the critical stress for crippling or buckling, or, in the case
of fatigue, to the stress for which the probability of survival, under tests, is 90 %.
The suitability of the selected material to resist brittie fTacture should be assessed as outlined in section
3-1.
The stresses in the structural members should be calculated on the basis of the different load c.ases as.
defined in section 2-3 by applying conventional strength of materials calculation procedures.
The sections of metal to be cOilsidered shall be the gross sections (i.e. without deducting the are~s of holes)
,for all parts which are subjected to compression loads (I); and the net sections (i;e. with the areas of holes
deducted) for all parts subjected to tensile loads.
In the case of a member subjected to bending, a half-net section should be assumed, taking the net section
in parts under tension and the gross section in parts urider compression. To simplify the calculations.
however, one may use either the section modulus of the net section or the section modulus computed for
the half-net section, using 'as centre of gravity of the section that of the gross section.
(I) l}1e.area ofthe holes shall be included in the cross-sectionl area only when they are filled by a rivet or
a bolt.
.. ./
3-4
3-1
FEM Section II
to
suit on the
Influences A., B. and C. are evaluated with coefficients ZA, ZB and Zc respectively. The required steel
quality is then determined from on the sum of these coefficients.
3-1.1.1 INFLUENCE A :
COMBINED EFFECT OF LONGITUDINAL
RESIDUAL TENSILE STRESSES WITH STRESSES FRM DEAD
LAD
Equations for lines I, Il, III in figure 3-1.1.1.
Line I : no weIds, or only transverse weIds
ZA =
(JG
- I
0.5 . (Ja
ZA=
(JG
+I
0.5 . (Ja
where:
(Ja
.. ./
FEM Setion II
3-5
The likehood of brittle fracture is increased by high stress concentrations, in particularby 3-axial
tensile slresses, as is the case with an accumulation of weIds.
IC members are stress relieved after welding (approx 600 - 650C) line I can be used for all types of
weIds.
3.------------r----------/l
1
N
c:
Q)
:::
Q)
0
0
0>
c:
ti)
ti)
Q)
ti)
ti)
ro
o 1L.---------....:....----::-7---------.:.-~1.'O
Figure 3-1.1.1
ZA IN TERMS OF STRESSES AND WELDS
.. ./
3-6
FEM Section II
t
mm
ZB
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
15
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.8
mm
ZB
mm
ZB
5 to t =: 20 mm:
from t =:
9
ZB =: 2500 . t2
20 to
fCom t=:
= 100 mm:
16
20
25.
30
35
40
45
50
55
0.9
1.45
2.0
2.5
2.9
3.2
3~5
3.8
4.0
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
4.3
4.55
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
5
A
10
20
30
~.
50
60
70
80
90
100
Thickness of member
Figure 3-1.1.2
ASSESSING COEFFICIENT ZB =: f (t)
For round, square or rectangular solid sections an equivalent thickness t' is to be used. This is :
,
d
=:-
t =-
~or
t =:-
rectangular sections :
1.8
1.8
1.8
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
3-7
where b represents th larger side of the rectangle and the ratio of the side bIt ~ 1.8. For bit > 1.8.
= t.
t'
Ze
9 '
Ze
6-
- 2.25 . T - 33.75
10
J2
1-
-10
"
-20
-30
-40
-GO
Temperature in oe
T
oe
Ze
T
oe
Ze
0
-5
-10
- 15
20
- 25
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.8
1.5
2.3
- 30
- 35
- 40
- 45
- 50
- 55
3.4
4.5
5.6
6.7
7.9
9.0
Figure 3-1.1.3
ASSESSING eOEFFIeIENT Ze = f (T)
.../
FEM Section II
Table T.3-1.2
CLASSIFICATIONOF QUALITY GROUPS IN RELATI0N
TO THE SUM OF THE ASSESSING COEFFICIENTS
~2
~4
~8
~16
1
2
3
4
The steels are divided into four quality groups. The group in which the steel is classified, is obtained from
its notch ductility in a given test and temperature.
Table T.3-1.3 comprises the notch ductility values and test temperatures for the four quality groups.
The indicated notch ductilities are minimum values, being the mean values from three tests, where no
value must be below 20 Nmlcm 2
Thenotch ductility is to be determined in accordance with V~notch impact tests to ISO R 148 and
Euronorm 45-63.
Tc
Tc and T
are not directly comparabie as the V-notch impact test imposes a more unfavourable condition
than the loading on the appliance in or out of service.
. ../
FEM Section II
3-9
Table T.3-1.3
QUALITYGROUPS
Quality
group
Notch ductility
measured in ISO sharp
notch test ISO R 148
in NrnJcm 2
3S
3S
~.:
35
Test
temperature
Tc oe
+ 20
Cf
- 20C
SteeIs corresponding
to the quality group
designation of steels ( I)
Fe 360 - A
Fe 430 - A
St 37 - 2
St 44 - 2
E 24 - I
43 A
Fe 360 - B
Fe 430 - B
Fe SlO - B
R St 37 - 2
St 44-2
E 24 - 2
E 28 - 2
E 36 - 2
40 B 43 B SO B
Fe 360 - e
Fe 430 - e
Fe SlO - C
St 37 - 3N
St 44 - 3N
St 52 - 3N
E 24 - 3
E 28 - 3
E 36 - 3
40 C 43 C
SO C
Fe 360 - 0
Fe 430 - 0
Fe 510 - 0
St 37 - 3N
St 44 - 3N
St 52 - 3N
E 24 - 4
E 28 - 4
E 36 - 4
400430
SOD
Standard
ISO 630
DIN 17 100
NF A 3S-S01
BS 4360 1986
ISO 630
DIN 17100
NF A 3S-S01
BS 43601986
ISO 630
DIN 17100
NF A 35-501
BS 43601986
ISO 630
DIN 17100
NF A 35-501
BS 43601986
The test requirements of steels to BS 4360 do not in all cases correspond with the ISO and other
national standards, and the guaranteed impact test properties for steels to BS 4360 may be different to
other steels in the same quality group. Impact test properties are stated in BS 4360 and where the
requirements are different from those guaranteed in BS 4360. agreement must be obtained Jrom the
steel suppliers.
(I) In the present rules. steels are designed by the ISO symbols, essentially Fe 360, Fe 430, Fe SlO.
../
3-10
FEM Section II
Members of more than 50 mm thickness, shall not be used for welded load carrying structures unless
the manufacturer has a comprehensive experience in the welding of thick plates. The steel quality and
its testing has in this case to be determined by specialists.
3) If pans are coid bent with a radiiJs/plate thickness ratio < 10, the steel quality has to be suitable for
folding or cold flanging.
.../
FEM Section II
3-2
3-11
Load case
vE
1.5
1.33
1.2
<JE
OE
1.5
<JE
1.33
1.2
permissible
stresses 0a
*
*
For currently manufactured carbon steels of grades (ISO) Fe. 360 - Fe 430 - Fe 510, the critical
stress OE is conventionally taken as that which ,corresponds to a permanent e1ongation of 0.2 %.
<JE
OR
<JE
Steel grade
<Xl
mm
mm.K
aR
N/mm 2
370
0.65
21 .
IO~
8.1 .
IO~
1.2 . 10- 5
280
440
0.64
21 .
IO~
8.1 .
IO~
1.2 . 10- 5
360
520
0.69
21 .
IO~
8.1 .
IO~
1.2 . 10- 5
N/mm 2
N/mm 2
240
Fe 430
Fe Sla
Fe 360
N/mm 2
.'
.. ./
3-12
FEM Section IJ
Table T.3-2.1.1
VALUES OF OE AND 0a FOR STEELS Fe 360 - Fe 430 - Fe 510
Elastic limit
Steel grade
OE
N/mm 2
Fe 360
Fe 430
Fe 510
2)
240
280
360
180
210
270
200
233
300
For steels with high elastic limit, where the ratio oE / OR is greater than 0.7, the use of the vE
coefficients does not ensure a sufficierit margin of safety. In this case a check has to be made that
the pennissible stress 0a given by the fonnula below is not exceeded :
OE + OR
(ja =0E(Fe 510) + OR (Fe 510) . a(Fe 510)
where
OE and OR
are the elastic limit and the ultimate tensile strength of thesteel
considered
0a(Fe 510)
.. ./
FEM Section II
2) that the equivalent stress
When using this fonnula, a simple method is to take the maximum values cr x, cr and T )'. Rut, in
y
x
fact, such a calculation leads to too great an equivalent stress when it is impossible forthe
maximum values of each of the three stresses to occur simultaneously.
Ifthe equivalent stress is to be calculated more precisely, It IS necessary to determine the most
unfavourable practical combination that may oCcur. Three checks must then be made by calcul~ting
successively the equivalent stress resulting from the three following combinations :
cri( max
cry max
Txy max
Note: 11 should be noted that when two out of the three stresses are approximately of the same
value, and greater than half the pennissible stress, the most unfavourable combination of the
threevalues may occur in different loading cases from those corresponding to the maximum of each
of the three stresses.
' .
Special case:
- Tension(or compression) combined with shear
.. ./
3-14
FEM Section Ir
Table T.3-2.2.1
WELD OUALITIES
Type of weid
Weid
quality
Example
of symbols
Execution of weId
Weid lesling
Symbol
P 100
I)
special
quality
(S.Q.)
--
~
---
--
""
ordinary
quality
special
quality
(S.Q.)
K-weld in angle formed
by two parts with bevel
on one of the parts to be
joined at location of
seam
-':t
P 100
PlO
+;
ordinary
quality
[{
welded edges without
undercutting and geound if
necessary
m
~
~
1) weId symbols are taken from ISO 2553, this symboI . . means root of weId scraped
. ./
FEM Section 11
taw =
V2
However, for certain types of loading, particularly transverse stresses in the weIds. the maximum
permissible equivalent stress is reduced.
..
;;:-
Table T.3-2.2.2 summarizes the maximum permissible values. for certain steels, according to the
type. of loading (and the load case).
Table T.3-2.2.2
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE STRESSES IN WELDS (Jaw (N/mm~)
STEELS Fe 360 - Fe 430 - Fe 5 10
Types of loading
.LONGITtJDINAL
AND EQUIVALENT
STRESSES FOR
ALL TYPES OF
WELDS
TRANSVERSE
TENSILE
STRESSES
1) bult-weIds (S.Q.
or C.Q.) and
special quality
K-welds
2) ordinary quality
K-welds
3) fiBet weIds (S.Q.
or C.Q.)
TRANSVERSE
COMPRESSIVE
STRESSES
1) bult-weIds and
K-welds (S.Q. or
C.Q.)
2) fiBet weld~ (S.Q.
or C.O.)
SHEAR
(S.O~ OR C.O.)
Fe 360
Fe 430
case I
case 11
case 111
case I
case 11
case 111
case I
Fe 510
case 11
case 111
160
180
200
187
210
233
240
270
300
160
180
200
187
210
233
240
270
300
140
158
175
164
184
204
210
236
263
113
127
141
132
149
165
170
191
212
160
180
200
187
210
233
240
270
300
130
146
163
152
171
189
195
220
244
113
127
141
132
149
165
170
191
212
.. ./
3-16
FEM Section IJ
I) All methods of calculation assume of necessity a properly executed joint. i.e. a weid with correct
penetration and a good shape. so that the joint between the components to be assembied and the
weid seam is free from discontinuity or sudden change of section as weil as from craters or notches
due to undercutting.
The design of the weid must be adapted to the forces to be transmitted. and specialized literature on
the subject should be consulted;
It should be noted that the strength of a welded joint is significantly improved if the surface of the
weid is finished by careful grinding.
2) There is no need to take into consideration stress concentrations due to the design of the joint or
residual stresses.
3) The permissible stresses in weids are those deterrnined under clause 3-2.2.2 and the equivalent stress
acpw in the case of combined stress (tensile or compressive) a andshear stress r is given by the
formula:
acpw =
"a
+ 2r 2
::;
aaw
(given in 3-2.2.2)
In cases involving dual stresses Ox anday and the shearing stress r xy the following formuia is
applied:
4) In a fillet weid. the thickness of the section considered is the depth of the weid to the bottom of the
throat and its length is the effective length of the weid less the end craters.
This length need not be reduced if the joint closes on to itself or if special precautions are taken to
limit the effect of the craters.
. 5) Attention is drawn to the fact that it seems to be reliably established that fatigue failures in welded
joints seldom occurin the weid seam itself but usually beside it in the parent metal.
.. .I
FEM Section IJ
3-17
Therefore. in general the stresses (jmin and (Jmax for the fatigue strength calculations for the parent
metal beside the weid seam, mUSI be computed using the classical melhods for calculaling the
strenglh of materiais.
In order 10 verify lhe fatigue strength of the weid, itself. il is generally held thai it is sufficient to
confinn lhat the weid is capable. of transmitting the same loads as the adjacent parent melaL
This mIe is nOl obligatory however when the parts jointed are generously dimensioned in relalion la
the forces actually transmitted. When this is the case lhe weId ,seam need only b dimensianed in
accardance with those forces. with the proviso that a fatigue check should then be performed in
accordance withchapler 3-4.5.2.1.
Whalever the case it is emphasised thai the size of a weid should invariably be in proponionto lhe
thickness of the assem bIed pans.
.../
3-18
FEM Section II
DEFINITIONS
Mobile equipment for continuous handling of bulk materials includes a large range of both sizes and
types of structure which, in turn, can be subjected to a wide variety of loads.
Various structural and mechanical engineering disciplines have evolved simplified rules and codes of
practice for (he use of bolts with the types of structure and loadings most commonly encountered in
each particular field.
Bulk material handling machines often include design details of many types, and it is the
responsibility of the designing engineer to apply existing codes of practice only where appropriate.
National standardsand codes of practice, though often similar, do vary considerably in detail between
countries. Where National standards exist, these may be used in order to comply with local
regulations and to suit the bolts, nuts, etc available in the country of manufacture and use.
In an atlempt to avoid problems aristing from particular n~ltional interpretations of certain terms
phrases, some definitions are given in the following chapters.
.
and
In this section, the term "bolt" may be taken to include all ISO metric bolts, screws, studs and
threaded fasteners. In every case, for each type and grade of bolt, the appropriate nut and washers
shouldbe used.
3-2.3.1.2
DESIGN
Bolted joints should be designed on the basis of arealistic assumption of the distribution of internal
forces, having regard to relative stiffnesses. Such an assumption should correspond with the direct
load paths through the elements of connections.
Where members are connected to the surface of the web or flange of a section, the local ability of
the .web or flange to transfer the applied forces should be checked and stiffening provided where
necessary.
Ease of fabrication and erection should be considered in the design of joints and splices. Attention
should be paid to clearances necessary for tightening fasteners, welding procedures, subsequent
inspection, surface treatment arid maintenance.
.../
FEM Section II
3-19
The ductility of steel assist the distribution of forces generated within a joint. Therefore residual
stresses need not usually be calculated.
When different forms of fasteners are used, or when welding and fasteners are combined to carry a
sheai load, then one form of connection should normally be designed to carry the totalload.
Threaddiameter
d t (mm)
fine
coarse
12
16
20
24
30
36
13
17
21
25
31
37
13.5
17.5
22
26
33
39
14.5
18.5
24
28
35
42
Notes: \Yhere necessary to avoid interference between the edge of the hole and the under-head fillet
of the bolt, a chamferis recommended.
.. ./
3-20
FEM Sectin II
Especially for higher grade bolts under tension in medium and coarse clearance holes, it may he
necessary to check the hearing stress in the plate material under the bolt head and nut, using
hardened steel washers as necessary, to transfer the load.
3-2.3.1.3
CONTROLLED TIGHTENING
Joints tightened by controlled means must not be placed under externally applied structural load
until the jointing process is complete. This may include the tightening of more than one joint.
Care should be taken to ensure that bolts are correctly tightened and that the preload induced in the
first bolts in a joint is not lost as the rest of the bolts are tightened.
The use of spring or bite type lock washers is not recommended for bolts tightened by controlled
means. The extra friction and joint settlement involved causes unpredictable results and loss of
preload.
Each system of controlled tightening has its associated tolerance range. and both the designer and
user must be aware of this to ensurethat the bolt is neither over-tensioned nor the joint undertensioned and liable to slip or fatigue.
During controlled torque tightening, consideration must be given to the effects of thread and nut face
friction. Under the combined effect of tension and torsional loading, the nominal tensile stress
should not exceed 80 % of the eIastic limit to take account of the scatter in the tightening process.
3-2.3.1.4
In
.. ./
FEM Section II
3-21
DEFINITIONS
Ordinary bolts, often referred to as black bolts, are carbon steel bolts with wide geometric
tolerances, normally ofthe lower strength grades (e.g. DIN 601, BS 4190 and ISO 4016).
Note : the term "black" no longer relates to the appearances of the product, which may look either
black or bright in its finished state.
3-2.3.2.2
APPLICA nON
Ordinary or black bolts are normally used in medium or coarse'
that do not transmit heavy loads.
c1earanc~
in tension
'tab = 0.5 Ga
in shear
Gan = 1.0 Ga
Note:
The permissiblestress in bearing should be based on the yield stress ofthe bolt or the plate
material, whichever has the lowest value.
Wherever there is a risk of nuts or bolts coming loose, they should be secured by the use of locking
washers or equivalent.
3-2.3.3.1
. ../
3-22
FEM Section II
Note: Spring or bite~type lock washers are not nonnally effective when used with bolts of
grade 8.8 and above, where the hardness of the bolt is similar to or greater than that of the loek
washer.
The maximum tensile stress (Jb shall not exceed 0.8 (JE.
(Jb
S;
(Jab
=0.8 (JE
.
2d2(Jp (Pa
'
)
where 'tb = d
. -d- + 1.15511
t
7t 2
where
(Jp
'tb
d2
dt
Pa
= thread pitch
11
* It is necessary to get (from the manufacturer for instance) the actual value of 11. Just for
infannation, the friction coefficient is nonnally between 0.10 and 0.18.
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
3-23
Determine :
where
FI
== laad on joint
Sb
K.K'
where
-~11
~12
Op, 'tb
== as defined above
~ : For assembIed steel parts, the equivalent section Seq to be considered for .1.l1 should be :
where
Dl == hearing diameter under bolt head
Ik == length of tightening
Dt == diameter of bolt holes
.. ./
3-24
FEM Section II
Note 2 : For bolts whose shank diameter differs significantly from theroot diameter of the thread,
or where there is an appreciable threaded length contained within the bolt stretch length, a complete
calculation of ~12 should be made.
where
n = I.l
depends on the surface finish of the mating parts (K = 1 for machined surface)
K'
K"
Table T.3-2.3.3. )
case I
case 11
case III
K'
1.5
1.33
1.2
K!'
1.3
Note: The coefficients K' and K" should be applied to the most unfavourable condition . arising
from the scatter in applying theinitial tightening effort.
3-2.3.3.2
.. ./
FEM Section II
3-25.
The calculated shear stress must not exceed 0.5 (ja as for ordinary bolting.
Note: The permissible stress in bearing should be based on tbe yield stress of tbe bolt or plate
material, whichever has tbe lowest value.
B) Bolts in fined holes
The calculated shear stress 't must be :
for single shear
't $
0.6 (ja
':$
single shear
3-2.3.3.3
double. shear
in tension
in single shear
in double shear
3-2~3.3.4
(j
0.625
't $
0.6
't $
0.8 (ja
(ja
(ja
.. ./
3-26
FEM Section 11
Bearing capacity
The hearing pressure shall not exceed :
1.3 (Ja for fitted balts in single sheat
. 1.75 (Ja for fitted balts in double shear.
where
dt
=the thickness of the connected plate less half the depth of the chamfer, if appropriate
rIl
,""'-..
,/
11""
I
I
d
t-'----j-
_1_ -1:-----+--...,'
~J
J
I
where dt and t are as above and e is the edge distanee from the centre of the bolt hole to the nearest
plate edge in the direction in which the bolt will shear.
../
FEM Section.II
3-27
Table T.3-2.3.3.5
PERMISSIBLE WaRKING STRESSES FaR ORDINARY AND HIGHER GRADE BaLTS SUMMARY
ISO bolt
grade
load
case
I
4.6
m
I
5.6
m
I
8.8
n
m
10.9
shear
bolts in
non filled holes
pennissible perrnissible
shear
OOring
stress
stress
(1.75 (Ja) (0.5 (Ja)
N/riJm 2
N/mm 2
280 *
80
316 *
90
350 .*
100
pennissible
beaing
stress
(1.0 (Ja)
N/mm 2
160
180
200
125
141
156
120
135
150
260 *
293 *
325 *
.160
180
200
350 *
395 x
438 x
100
113
125
200
226
250 *
267
301
333
256
289"
320
555 x
626 x
693 x
341
385
427
747 x
842 x
933 x
213
241
267
427 x
481 x
533 x
375
423
469
360
406
450
780 x
880 x
"975 x
480
541
600
1050 x
1184 x
1313 x
300
338
375
600 x
677 x
750 x
*. bearing stress exceeds elastic limit of plate material Fe 360 steel (i.e. 240 N/mm 2)
x: bearing stress exceeds elastic limit of plate material Fe 510 steel (i.e. 360 N/mm 2)
../
3-28
FEM Section 11
3-2.3.4 HIGH
TENSILE
STEEL
BOLTS
WITH
CONTROLLED
TIGHTENING USED FOR FRICTION GRIP JOINTS
3-2.3.4.1
GENERAL
This type of joint is recomrnended for joints subject to fatigue where the primary loads are parallel
to the joint faces.
The joint is made using high tensile steel bolts, in conjunction with high strength nuts and
hardned steel washers. These elements are tightened to a specified minimum shank tensionso that
loads can be transferred between connected parts by friction and not by shear or bearing on the bolt.
At the time of assembly, the mating surfaces must be free from paint, oil, din, loose rust or scaIe
and any burrs and other defects which would prevent solid seating of the joint faces and interfere
with the development of friction between them.
Where specific National codes or standards exist these may be used in place of this section.
(JE 0.2 %
ISO bolt
grade
N/mm 2
N/mm 2
640
800
8.8
900
1,000
10.9
1,080
1,200
12.9
The diameter of the bolt hole shall be na more than 2 mm larger than that of the bolt.
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
~-29
nomina! diameter
(mm)
JO
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
27
30
36.6
58
84.3
115
157
192
245
303
353
459
561
3-2.3.4.1.3
WHASHERS
A friction grip joint with high tensile steel balts must always indude two hard steel washers, one
under the bolt head, one under the nul. Where ihese whashers have a 45 bevel on the internal rim,
this must be tumed towards the bolt head or nul. The washers must have been heat treated sa that
their hardness is at least equal to those of the bolt rriaterial.
is a cocfficient which indudes the effeclS of thread ferm and thread and nut/head to washer
friction. It is necessary to gei (from the supplier for instance), the actual value of C to take it
into account in the calcuiation of the tightening torqlle.
Natel: The use of grease in the thread and between nut/head and washer decreases the value of
coefficient C and allows for a better idea of the exact valueof this coefficient~ But it is absolutely
necessary to ensure that na grease is 'present between the plates to be joined. The use of MoS
2
grease (molykote for instance) is strongly recommended because MoS 2 sticks and stays where it hs
been applied ia, while other lubricants tend to creep and enter bctween the plates to be joined.
Furthermore the used of MoS 2 leads to lowest friction values for bolt tightening.
Note 2 : Where corrosion problems are anticipated, hot galvanized or, sherardised balts can be used.
In that case, brittleness due to galvanizing has to be considered.
.../
3-30
FEM Section II
2nd case: several rows of bolts perpendicular to tbe direction of tbe load.
The most heavily loaded section (corresponding to
row 1 for tbe member A - see figure) must he
analysed and tbe" following two conditions
checked:
a)
,I
I
I
):.J
I
>-<
-,;.
~ ~
~y
"
.
I
lr
"
This assumes tbat tbe load withina row is equally divided amongst all tbe bolts and tbat the number
of rows of bolts is small because if tbere are too many, tbe last bolts carry little load. lt is tberefore
recommendedtbat not more tban two rows of bolts should be used or exceptionally three.
3-2.3.4.2
T~".m
a - VT
where
1.1.
is tbe clamping force in the joint per bolt givn in tables T.3-2.3.4.5.4
.. ./
FEM Section II
3-31
Fig. 3-2.3.4.2
NUMB"ER OF EFFECTIVE FRICTION SURFACES
L$
1IT
1 friction surface m= I
I
2 friction surfaces m = 2
I
.:1
Ilr
,
J
i"
,;,"
o'
J
3 friction surfaces m = 3
"
.. ./
3-32
FEM Seclon II
Table T.3-2.3.4.2
VALUES OF bl
joined material
Fe 360
0.30
0.50
Fe 430
0.30
0.50
Fe 510
0.30
0.55
(2)
3~2.3.4.3
3-2.3.4.4
3-2.3.4.5
a)
That, for the most highly stressed bolt, the sum of the tensile stresses due to N and M loadings
remains less than thepermissible tensile stress asdefined in 3-2.3.3. This requirement is met where
the external tensile force doesn't exceed the values given in table T.3-2.3.4.5.1.
.. ./
. FEM Section 11
Table T.3-2.3.4.S.1
PERMISmLE ADDmONAL NOOd.penn TENSILE FORCE PER BOLT
laad case
IJ
0.6 F
0.7 F
0.8 F
b)
That the mean laad T per bolt which is transmilled by friction is less ~han the following value :
Nad~penn - Nreal
.0.8) Ta
OOd.penn
where Ta is the admissible laad per bolt if there isno additional externaltensile force (3-2.3.4.2).
Ta values are given in table T.3-2.3.4.5.4.
b2) T::;
f.l .
(F - N)
vT
.m
The additional tensile force N increases the bolt stress after tightening by a certain sum which
depends on the elasticity of the bolt and of the compressed members. This relation can be taken into
account by the "coefficient of elongation" which depends, for solid steel plates and for the types of
balts nonnally used in construction engineering, on the length of tightening Ik and the diameter of
the bolt dt.
(Ja
=0.7 (JE
the pennissible additional tensile force Na can be caJculated with the following fonnula :
0~12 (JE . Fs
Va .
l1>
.. ./
3-34
FEM Section II
in which
coefficient of elongation on the basis of the ratio Ik/dt according to table T.3-2.3.4.5.2
Fs =
Table T.3-2.3.4.5.2 .
COEFFICIENT OF ELONGAnON
Ik = length of tightening
Ik/dt
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
<1>
0.43
0.42
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.33
0.32
0.30
0.29
.5.0
0.27
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
0.26
0.25
0.24
0.22
0.21
Table T.3-2.3.4.5.3 gives pennissible additional tensile forces Na for different bolts materiaIs,
diameters and load cases.
The following tabIe, T.3-2.3.4.5.4, gives per bolt and per friction surface, the values of the
transmissible forces in the plane parallel to that of the joint for various friction coefficients for the
steels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510.
To apply these values, the number of effective friction surfaces as indicated in 3-2.3.4.2 must he
determined.
.../
FEM Section II
3-35
Table T.3-2.3.4.5.3
PERMISSIBLE ADDITIONAL TENSILE FORCES Na IN kN
FOR BaLTS AFTER TIGHTENING WITH CLAMPING FRCE F IN kN
tightening
length
dt =
F=
Ik (mm)
16mm
70kN
load case
TI
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18.8
19.6 .
20.9
22.3
24.5
25.9
27.5
29.8
31.2
32.9
21.2
22.1
23.5
25.2
27.7'
29.2
31.0
33.6
35.2
37.0
III
23.5
24.5
26.1
27.9
30.7
32.4
34.4
37.2
39.0
41.0
dt = 20 mm
F= 110 kN
load case
I
TI
29.2
29.9
31.4
33.0
34.8
38.0
39.2
41.8
43.3
46.5
32.9
33.7
35.4
37.2
39.3
42.9
44.2
47.2
48.8
52.4
III
36.5
37.3
39.2
41.3
43.6
47.5
49.0
52.3
54.1
58.1
d t = 24 mm
F= 158 kN
load case
I
TI
42.7
44.1
45.9
48.0
50.2
54.0
55.9
58.3
60.9
48.2
49.7
51.8
54.1
56.6
60.8
63.0
65.8
68.7
III
53.4
55.1
57.4
60.0
62.8
67.4
69.9
72.9
76.2
tightening
dt =
F=
Ik (mm)
16mm
99 kN
load case
TI
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
26.4
27.6
29.4
31.4
34.5
36.5
38.6
41.9
43.9
46.2
29.8
31.1
33.1
35.4
38.9
41.1
43.6
47.2
49.5
52.0
lengt~
III
33.1
34.5
36.7
39.3
43.1
45.6
48.3
52.3
54.9
57.7
dt = 20 mm
F= 154 kN
load cse
I
TI
41.0
42.0
44.1
46.4
49.0
53.5
55.1
58.8
60.8
65.3
46.3
47.4
49.7
52.4
55.3
60.3
62.2
66.3
68.6
73.7
III
51.3
52.5
55.1
58.0
61.3
66.8
68.9
73.5
76.0
81.7
dt = 24 mm
F= 222 kN
load case
1
TI
60.0
62.0
64.6
67.5
70.6
75.9
78.6
82.0
85.7
67.7
69.9
72.9
76.1
79.6
85.6
88.7
92.5
96.6
III
75:0
77.5
80.8
84.3
88.3
94.8
98.3
102.5
107.1
.. ./
FEM Section II
Table T.3-2.3.4.5.4
lRANSMISSIBLE FORCES IN THE PLANE OF mE JOINT
ALL FORCES GlVEN PER BOLT AND PER FRICTION SURFACE Ta IN kN
tensile
stress
area
damping
force
applied
force
c-=O,14
dt
mm
Fs
mm!
F
kN
Ma
Nm
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
27
30
58
84.3
115
157
192
245
303
353
459
561
26
37
52
70
86
110
136
158
205
249
40
5.6
7.9
68
112 11.1
172 15.0
238 18.4
336 23.6
460 29.1
584 33.9
852 43.9
1,150 53.3
6.2
8.9
12.5
16.8
20.6
26.4
32.6
37.9
49.2
59.7
7.1
10.1
14.2
19.1
23.5
30.0
37.1
43.1
55.9
67.9
lensile
stress
area
damping
force
applied
force
<'=0.14
nonnally prepared
surfaces
uSlOg Sleels
Fe 360. Fe 430. Fe 510
~ = 0.30
usmg steels
TI
9.3
13.2
18.6
25.0
30.7
39.3
10.4 11.8
14.8 16.8
20.8 23.6
'28.0 31.8
34.4 39.1
44.0 50.0
54.4 61.8
63.2 71.8
82.0 93.2
95.6 113.1
48~6
56.4
73.2
88.9
nonnally prepared
surfaces
uSlOg SleelS
Fe 360. Fe 430. Fe 510
~ = 0.30
mm
Fs
mm 2
F
JeN
Ma
Nm
TI
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
27
30
58
84.3
ll5
157
192
245
303
353
459
561
37
53
73
99
121
154
191
222
289
350
57
98
157
244
335
474
647
820
1,200
1,617
7.9
11.4
15.6
21.2
25.9
33.0
40.9
47.6
61.9
75.0
8.9
12.7
17.5
23.8
29.0
37.0
45.8
53.3
69.4
84.0
10.1
14.5
19.9
27.0
33.0
42.0
52.1
60.5
78.8
95.5
dt
TI
TI
m
18.5
26.5
36.5
49.5
60.5
77.0
95.5
111.0
144.5
175.0
* c = 0.14 is used only as an example value. Where this coefficient is known or given by tbe
supplier, the values of Applied Torque must be adjusted accordingly.
In tbe above tables, <Ja is limited to a maximum value of 0.7 <JE.
In same circumstances, higher values based on a maximum of 0.8 <JE can be used, but there is a
higher risk of bolt failure, and bolts tightened to 0.8 <JE must not be additionally loaded in tension .
by an extemalload.
.
Far bolts with 10wer strengtb grades, the values given above may he multiplied by the ratio of their
yield or 0.2 % proof stresses.
.../
FEM Section II
3-37
.../
. .FEM Section 11 .
3-38
3-3
The values of (1), as a function of the slenderness ratio , are given in the tables below for the following
cases:
Table
Table
Table
Table
T.3-3.1.1
T.3-3.1.2
T.3-3.1.3
T.3-3.1.4
:
:
:
:
rolled sections in
rolled sections in
tubes in
tubes in
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
360
510
360
510
steel
steel
steel
steel
1- In theordinarycase ofbarspinjoined at both ends and loaded axially, the effective length is taken as
the length between between points of articulation.
2 - For an axially loaded bar encastered at one end and free at the other the effective length is taken as twice
the length of the bar.
3 - For intermediate cases where uncertainty exists at present about the effect of fixity on members in
compression, the effects of fixity are ignored and the member should be designed as if it were pin
jointed at both ends, with the effective length being taken as the lengthbetween points of intersection.
ofaxes.
Mp
-S + -I - -<~
va
../
FEM Section II
3-39
and
Me v'
roF
+ 0.9 - I- :5 (Ja
where:
F
Mf
- or perform the precise calculation in terms ofthe deformations sustained by the bar under the combined
effect of bending and compression, the necessary calculation being effectedeither by integrationor by
successive approximations.
.../
3-40
FEM Section II
Table T.3-3.1.1
VALUE OF THE COEFFICIENT (J) IN TERMS OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO .FOR ROLLED SECTIONS IN Fe 360 STEEL
20
30
40
1.04
1.08
1.14
1.04
1.09
l.l4
1.04
1.09
l.l5
50
60
70
80
90
1.21
1.30
1.41
1.55
1.71
1.22
1.31
i.42
1.56
1.73
100
110
120
140
1.90
2.11
2.43
2.85
3.31
150
160
170
180
190
1.05 .
1.10
1.16
1.05
1.10
1.16
1.06
1.11
1.17
1.06
1.11
l.l8
1.07
1.12
I.l9
1.07
1.13
1.19
1.08
1.13
1.20
1.23
1.32
1.44
1.58
1.74
1.23
1.33
1.45
1.59
1.76
1.24
1.34
1.46
1.61
1.78
1.25
1.35
1.48
1.62
1.80
1.26
1.36
1.49
1.64
1.82
1.27
1.37
1.50
1.66
1.84
1.28
1.39
1.52
1.68
1.86
1.29
1.40
1.53
1.69
1.88
1.92
2.14
2.47
2.90
3.36
1.94
2.16
2.51
2.94
3.41
1.96
2.18
2.55
2.99
3.45
1.98
2.21
2.60
3.03
3.50
2.00
2.23
2.64
3.08
3.55
2.02
2.27
2.68
3.12
3.60
2.05
2.31
2.72
3.17
3.65
2.07
2.35
2.77
3.22
3.70
2.09
2.39
2.81
3.26
3.75
3.80
4.32
4.88
5.47
6.10
3.85
4.38
4.94
5.53
6.16
3.90
4.43
5.00
5.59
6.23
3.95
4.49
5.05
5.66
6.29
4.00
4.54
5.11
5.72
6.36
4.06
4.60
5.17
5.78
6.42
4.11
4.65
5.23
5.84
6.49
4.16
4.71
5.29
5.91
6.55
4.22
4.77
5.35
5.97
6.62
4.27
4.82
5.41
6.03
6.69
200
210
220
230
240
6.75
7.45
8.17
8.93
9.73
6.82
7.52
8.25
9.01
9.81
6.89
7.59
8.32
9.09
9.89
6.96
7.66
8.40
9.17
9.97
7.03
7.73
8.47
9.25
10.05
7.10
7.81
8.55
9.33
10.14
7.17
7.88
8.63
9.41
10.22
7.24
7.31
7.95
8.03
8.70 8.78
9.49
9.57
10.30 10.39
7.38
8.10
8.86
9.65
10.47
250
10.55
130
.. .I
FEM Section II
3-41
Table T.3-3.1.2
VALUE OF THE COEFFICIENT (J) IN TERMS OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO . .
FOR ROLLED SECTIONS IN Fe 510 STEEL
20
30
40
1.06
1.11
1.19
1.06
1.12
1.19
1.07
1.12
1.20
1.07
1.13
1.21
1.08
I. 14
1.22
1.08
1.15
1.23
1.09
1.15
1.24
1.09
1.16
1.25
1.10
1.17
1.26
1.10
1.18
1.27
50
60
70
80
90
1.28
1.41
1.58
1.79
2.05
1.30
1.43
1.60
1.8 I
2.10
1.31
1.44
1.62
1.83
2.14
1.32
1.46
1.64
1.86
2.19
1.33
1.48
1.66
1.88
2.24
1.35
1.49
1.68
1.91
2.29
1.36
1.51
1.70
1.93
2.33
1.37
1.53
1.72
1.95
2.38
1.39
1.54
1.74
1.98
2.43
1.40
1.56
1.77
2.01
2.48
100
110
]20
130
]40
2.53
3.06
3.65
4.28
4.96
2.58
3.12
3.7]
4.35
5.04
2.64
3.18
3.77
4.4]
5. I I
2.69
3.23
3.83
4.48
5. I 8
2.74
3.29
3.89
4.55
5.25
2.79
3.35
3.96
4.62
5.33
2.85
3.41
4.02
.4.69
5.40
2.90
3.47
4.09
4.75
5.47
2.95
3.53
4.15
4.82
5.55
3.01
3.59
4.22
4.89
5.62
150
]60
170
]80
]90
5.70
6.48
7.32
8.21
9.14
5.78
6.57
7.41
8.30
9.24
5.85
6.65
7.49
8.39
9.34
5.93
. 6.73
7.58
8.48
9.44
6.01
6.8]
7.67
8.58
9.53
6.09
6.90
7.76
8.67
9.63
6.16
6.98
7.85
8.76
9.73
6.24
7.06
7.94
8.86
9.83
6.32
7.15
8.03
8.95
9:93
6.40
7.23
8.12
9.05
10.03
200
210
220
230
240
10.13
I I. I7
12.26
13.40
14.59
10.23
11.28
12.37
13.52
14.71
10.34
11.38
12.48
13.63
14.83
10.44
11.49
12.60
13.75
14.96
10.54
11.60
12.71
13.87
15.08
10.65
11.71
12.82
13.99
15.20
10.75
11.82
12.94
14.11
15.33
10.85
11.93
13.05
14.23
]5.45
10.96
12.04
13. I7
14.35
15.58
IL06
12.15
13.28
14.47
15.71
250
15.83
,_
I';
.. ./
3-42
FEM Section 11
Table T.3-3.1.3
VALUE OF THE COEFFICIENT wINTERMS OF THE SLENDERNESS RA110 .
FOR TUBES IN Fe 360 STEEL
20
30
40
1.00
1.03
1.07
1.00
1.03
1.07
1.00
1.04
1.08
1.00
1.04
1.08
4
LOl .
1.04
1.09
LOl
1.05
1.09
LOl
1.05
UO
1.02
1.05
1.10
-l
!
;
1.02
1.06
UI
1.02
1.06
UI
~./
.,
50
60
70
80
90
LI2
U9
1.28
1.39
1.53
1.13
1.20
1.29
1.40
1.54
1.13
1.20
1.30
1.41
1.56
U4
1.21
1.31
1.42
1.58
1.15
1.22
1.32
1.44
1.59
U5
1.23
1.33
1.46
1.61
1.16
1.24
1.34
1047
1.63
1.17
1.25
1.35
1.48
1.64
1.17
1.26
1.36
1.50
1.66
1.18
1.27
1.37
1.51
1.68
100
110
1.70
2.05
1.73
2.08
1.76
2.12
1.79
2.16
1.83
2.20
1.87
2.23
1.90
1.94
1.97
2.01
Table T.3-3.IA
VALUE OF THE COEFFICIENT w IN TERMS OF SLENDERNESS RA110 A
FOR TUBES IN Fe 510 STEEL
20
30
40
1.02
1.05
UI
1.02
1.06
1.11
1.02
1.06
1.12
1.03
1.07
1.13
1.03
1.07
1.13
1.03
1.08
U4
1.04
1.08
U5
1.04
1.09
1.16
1.05
1.10
1.16
1.05
UO
U7
50
60
70
80
90
1.18
1.28
1.42
1.62
2.05
1.19
1.30
1.44
1.66
1.20
1.31
1.46
1.71
1.21
1.32
1.47
1.75
1.22
1.33
1.49
1.79
1.23
1.35
1.51
1.83
1.24
1.36
1.53
1.88
1.25
1.38
1.55
1.92
1.26
1.39
1.57
1.97
1.27
1.41
1.59
2.01
Note :
The values of w in ta~les T.3-3.1.3 and T.3-3.IA are valid for an axially loaded bar
consisting of a single tube whose diameter is equaJ to at least six times its
thickness.
.../
FEM Section 11
3-43
The following list is not exhaustive, but, among the most commonlyused methods, there are :
I
2
3
4
load case
buckling safety Vv
I
TI
III
buckling or curved meriJbers
circular cylinders
(e.g. : tubes)
I
TI
III
1.70
1.50
1.35
The edge-stresses ratio 'J1 varies between - 1 and + 1. For the definiton of vv, 't'. corresponds to the
plate to be stiffened.
.../
3-44
. From a theoretical standpoint, the critical buckling stress
and is given by the formula :
.E
OR
7[2 E
= 12 (1 -112)
FEM Section II
. ( ~b
)2
representing the critical buckling stress for a strip of thickness e, having a width equal te b, this being the
plate dimension measured in the direction perpendicular to the compression forces (see sketch below).
--
(eb )2
The critical buckling stress O';r must be a multiple of this value, whence, for compression :
.../
FEM Section 11
Values of coefficients
3-45
Ka and K,
Without wishing to enterinto the details of this problem, which is th subject of specialized works and of
particular standards, typical values of Ka and K, are given hereafter (see table T.3-3.3.1).
For more complex cases, reference should he made to specialized literature.
Combined compression and shear
Taking cr and , to be the calculated stresses in compression and
stress cr cr.c
v
is determined from the expression :
cr
In
v
Cf.C
{3
,v
cr
Whenever the formulae give values above these (imits, it is necessary to adop! a limiting critical value,
obtained by multiplying the calculated critical vaJue by the coefficient p given in the table T.3-3.3.2,
which also indicates the reduced values corresponding to various calculated vaJues of crv and, v .
cr
cr
.
.. ./
3-46
FEM Section TI
Table T.3-3.3.1
VALUES OF THE BUCKLING COEFFICIENTS Ka AND Kt
FOR PLATES SUPPORTED AT THEIR FOUREDGES
No.
a
a=b
case
Ka or Kt
-.
fT
a~
b-
a.o<b
a::;; 1
K a =4
1 2
Ka = (a +-)
a
Non-uniform compression
a
2
~0
_~
b
...,..
=
~
'1'6 ::
o<: .,.., 1 I a.ab
lij
cam
Tens.~
6i"y>Gi
-g
I a.ot!!....-
cam]?
Tens
{F"zg>UT
Lsz.....oc
Ka
Ka = (a +
. 2
a>-3
--
8.4
-'P+1.1
a::;; 1
<2
a_'3
1 2
a)
.'P 2.1
+ 1.1
Ka = 23.9
Ka = 15.87 +
1.:/ +
8.6 a2
Pure shear
a~1
11__bD~
bll
a::;; 1
4
Kt = 5.34 +.,......2
a
Kt = 4 + 5.34
a2
.. ./
FEM Section II
3-47
Table T.3-3.3.2
VALUES OF P AND THE REDUCED CRITICAL STRESSES
v
v'
crcr or
(Jcr or
crcr.c
,crv
calculaled
calculaled
cr
cr or
cr
crcr.c
'cr
crcr.c
,crv
reduced
reduced
calculaled
calculaled
steel Fe 360
....
.~ -::
192.0
200.0
210.0
220.0
230.0
240.0
250.0
260.0
270.0
280.0
290.0
300.0
320.0
340.0
360.0
380.0
400.0
420.0
440.0
460.0
480.0
500.0
550.0
600.0
650.0
700.0
800.0
1.000.0
2,000.0
10.000.0
00
111.0
116.0
121.0
127.0
133.0
139.0
144.0
150.0
156.0
162.0
167.0
173.0
185.0
196.0
208.0
219.0
231.0
243.0
245.0
266.0
277.0
289.0
318.0
346.0
375.0
404.0
462.0
577.0
1.155.0
5.774.0
1.00
0.99
0.97
0.94
0.92
0.89
0.86
0.83
0.81
0.79
0.77
0.74
0.70
0.67
0.63
0.60
0.58
0.55
0.53
0.50
0.48
0.47
0.43
0.39
0.36
0.34
0.30
0.24
0.12
0.02
cr or
crcr.c
,crv
reduced
reduced
steel Fe 510
192.0
198.3
203.7
207.7
210.9
213.6
215.9
217.8
219.4
220.9
222.2
223.3
225-.2
226.7
228.0
229.1
230.0
230.8
231.5
232.1
232.6
233.1
234.0
234.8
235.3
235.8
236.5
237.4
238.9
239.8
240.0
111.0
114.5
117.6
119.9
121.8
123.3
124.6
125.7
126.7
127.5
128.3
128.9
130.0
130.9
131.6
132.3
132.8
133.3
133.7
134.0
134.3
134.6
135.1
135.6
135.9
136.1
136.5
137.1
137.9
138.5
138.6
..
280.0
290.0
300.0
320.0
340:0
360.0
380.0
400.0
420.0
440.0
460.0
480.0
500.0
550.0
600.0
650.0
700.0
800.0
1,000.0
2.000.0
10,000.0
00
162.0
167.0
173.0
185.0
196.0
208.0
219.0
231.0
243.0
254.0
266.0
277.0
289.0
318.0
346.0
375.0
404.0
462.0
577.0
1,155.0
5.774.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
0.96
0.93
0.89
0.85
0.82
0.79
0.76
0.73
0.70
0.68
0.62
0.58
0.53
0.50
0.44
0.35
0.18
0.04
280.0
289.9
297.4
307.7
314.9
320.4
324.8
328.4
331.3
333.8
335.9
337.8
339.4
342.6
345.0
346.9
348.4
350.6
353.3
357.4
359.6
360.0
161.7
167.4
171.7
177.7
'181.8
185.0
187.5
189.6
191.3
192.7
193.9
195.0
196.0
197.8
199.2
200.3
201.1
202.4
204.0
206.3 .
207.6
207.8
.. ./
3-48
FEM Section II
IS .
must he
0400" 0 020rn
\.~.
) .
:
i?"'
bZ5
"*
P(
!:::;:=A==t::.======~==::1 :.====:;:B=l
*.1
~N ,
1,25m I,
10,00_
J?
~
<::>
J
.. ,
\l)
1500xO,DtOm
'0.
C).t--r~
/0./,00" 0 030m
474.7 . 10 .0.84. 10
1 419000 . 10 4
=28 N/mm
.. ./
FEM Section 11
3-49 -
These stresses are calculated at the upper and lower edges of the web.
Shear stress:
3
3
810.10 - 162.0.625.10 =47N/mm 2
10.1,500
'JI =
~o~~
giving Ka
= - 0.79
1.25 =.
083
=TSO
I)
in which K'
aR = 189800
a cr = Ka aR
.s.h~
K"('
=4 + 5.34
a2
=4
5.34 = 11 75
+ 0.83 2 .
.. ./
3-50
FEM Section II
and
v
cr
KL
aR
V28
+ 3 . 47
a cr.c =------:..;:;.;;~============
I - 0.79
28 ] 2
472
28
.. /[3 +40.79
158.5 + \J
158.5 + (99 J
4
onclu~iQn
= 168 N/mm 2
The comparison stress in the case of tension (or compression) combined with shear is glven
3-2.1.3 :
Va
In
clause
+ 3L 2 = 86 N/mm 2
This value is smaller than the admissible buckling stress (calculated with Vv
= 1.386)
i.e.
168
1.386 = 121 N/mm 2 for loading case 1.
< 25. aE .
r -
where:
= thickness of the wall
GE
.. ./
FEM Section TI
3-51
(J~I
= 0.2 . ..L..!
r
3 _
r;
=!.;f--\jf
I=IZ
2 - Eccentric disposition of the stiffener F2 (centre of gravity of the stiffener section F2 outside the median
plane of the wall F 1)
I = I} + 12 + Fl . e} + F2 . e2
"1 z"1
It is accepted that in the calculation of (J~ and (Jv account is taken of geometrical divergence due to
10cal constructi~n defects between the real and the ideal cylinder surfaces up to a maximum of
.../
3-52
3-4
FEM Section II
For slrUctural members and joints the fatigue strength shall be checked for load case I forces (main loads)
where these are expected to fluctuate significant1y and where the total number of load cyc1es is expected to
be more than 2.5. 105 in the anticipated lifetime of the machine.
All the static loads which mayalso ccur in various magnitudes, for example incrustation, have to he
calculated wilh that value which produces the highest tensile stress.
These two parameters are taken into account when considering the group in which the member is c1assified
in accordance wilh c1ause 2-1.4.4.
This group c1assification is later used in the determination of the allowable stress for fatigue.
. ./
FEM Section 11
'In order to classify the importance of these notch effects, the various joint details are divided into categories
as follows:
Unwelded'pans :
These members present three classes of notch effect:
Case Wo concerns the material itself without notch effect.
Cases WI and W2 concern perforated members (see tables T.3-4.5.2.3).
Welded pans :
These joints are arranged in order of the severity.of the notch effect increasing from
structural pans located close to the weId details.
'
The table T.3-2.2.1 gives some indications as to the quality of the welding required and the, weid
classification and tables T.3-4.5.2.3 give the various types of joints that are most often used in the
construction of handling appliances.
O"max
The maximum stress O'max is the highest absolute stress (i.e. it may be tension or compression) which
occurs in the member in load case I (see c1ause 2-3:1).
When checking members in compression for fatigue the crippling coefficient, 00, given
should not be applied.
3-4.4 RATIO
l(
In
clause 3-3
This ratio is determined by calculating the extreme values of the stresses to whiCh the component
subjected under case I loadings.
IS
The ratio may vary depending upon the operating cycles but it is on the safe side to determined this ratio' I(
,by taking the two extreme values which can occur during possible operations under case I loadings.
Where O'max and O'min are the values of these extreme stresses, O'max being the extreme stress having the
higher absolute value, the ratio I( may be written :
O'min
1(=-_
O'max
'!min
'!max
This ratio, which varies 'from + I to - I, is positive it the extreme stresses are, both of the same sense
(tluctuating stresses) and negative when the extreme stresses are of opposite sense (aIternting stresses).
... /
3-54
FEM Section II
10
Table T.3-4.5.1.1 gives basic values <r w, based on the result of research in trus field, for the deterrnination
of perrnissible stresses in Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510 steels, according to the various groups in which the
components are classified, and the notcheffect classes for the main types of joints used in the manufacture
of handling appliance.
3-4.5.1 FATIGUE
CHECK
(DETERMINATION . OF
FATIGUE)
3-4.5.1.1
FOR
STRUCTURAL
ELEMENTS
THE PERMISSIBLE STRESSES FOR
,I .
;
.. ./
FEM Section II
3-55
Table T.3-4.5.1.1
VALUES OF (Jw (N/mm 2) DEPENDING ON THE COMPONENT
GROUP AND CASE OF NOTCH EFFECT
component
group
EI
E2
E3
E4
ES
E6
E7
EB
Wo
WI
Fe3C>0
Fe 430
Fe 510
249.1
224.4
Fe3~0
Fe510
Fe3c>0
Fe 430
202.2
182.1
298.0
261.7
229.8
201.8
211.7
190.7
171.8
154.8
253.3
222.4
195.3
171.5
174.4
157.1
141.5
164.1
147.8
133.2
120.0
177.2
155.6
136.6
120.0
139.5.
125.7
113.2
102.0
150.6
132.3
116.2
102.0
Fe 430
Fe510
KO
KI
KZ
K3
K4
127.5
208.6
183.2 .
160.8
141.2
361.9
293.8
238.4
193.5
323.1
262.3
212.9
172.8
271.4
220.3
178.8
145.1
193.9
157.4
127.7
103.7
116.3
94.4
76.6
62.2
114.9
103.5
93.2
84.0
124.9
108.9
95.7
84.0
157.1
127.5
103.5
84.0
/40.3
113.8
92.4
75.0
117.8
95.6
77.6
63.0
84.2
68.3
55.4
45.0
50.5
41.0
33.3
27.0
Note: All values which are greater than the admissible values with respect to the elastic limit are
theoretical values only (see note at the end of c1ause 3-4:5.1.3).
For all values of K, the following formulae give the permissible stresses for fatigue :
a)
K:$
- for tension :
<Jt=<Jw3_2K
(I)
- for compression :
(2)
>0
<Jo
<Jt = - - - - - - -
- for tension :
I - [1 _ (JO]
(3)
<J+ 1
- for compression :
<Je
= 1.2 (Jt
(4)
.../
3-56
. FEM Section II
safety 1.33:
<J+l =0.75<JR
3-4.5;1.2
'ra =
3-4.5.1.3
<Jt of case
Wo
Wo
<Jy min
Y - <Jy max
K -
and
Kxy
'r xy min
'r xy max
and
None of the calculated stresses should exceed the permissible value of <Ja (or 'ra) in case I loading
(see table T.3-2.1.1).
Then for the verifiation under the effect of a combination of these three types of loads. the
following two cases are considered :
a)
If any one stress is markedly greater than the other two for a given load case, it is only necessary to
check the member for fatigue under that load, neglecting the effect of the other two.
b) In the other cases, in addition to checking for each loading assumed to act alone, it is recommended
that the following relationship be checked :
../
FEM Section II
(<J x max
<Jxa
3-57
* (I)
(5)
where the stress values <Jxa. <Jya and 1: xya are those resulting from .the applicalion of fonnulae (I),
(2), (3) and (4) of c1ause 3-4.5.1.1 and limiled to 0.66 <JE.
.
In applying this fonnula, reference should be made to the indications given
(including the note at the end).
In
clause 3-2.1.3.
In order to facilitate the calculations, table T.3-4.5. 1.3 gives the pennissiblC values of:
max
1:xya
LXY
as a function of
<Jx max
<Jxa
.
<Jx max
In thls tabIe, the values of
<Jxa
are given.
ay max
<Jya
and of
In
convention : theratio is considered to be positive if <Jx max and <Jy max have lhe same sign, and
negative otherwise.
*(1) As this inequality constitutes a severe requirement, values slightly higher that I are acceptable, but
('X y maxy
LOS
1:xya
I I I I
It should als~ be noted ~hat the values <Jxa and <Jya in lhe denominalor for the third lenn should be
taken as absolute values, <Jx max and .<Jy max being aSlgned their algebraic values.
. :.1
3-58
FEM Section IJ
ax max
axa
ay max
ya
1.0
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
1.0
0.9
0.8
0,7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.8
0
0.300 0.400
0.300 0.436 0520
0.400 0.520 0.600
0.458 0.575 0.656
0.490 0.608 .0.693
0.500 0.625 0.714
0.490 0.625 0.721
0.458 0.608 0.714
0.400 0.575 0.693
0.300 0.520 0.656
0.436 0.600
0
0.300 0.520
0.400
0.173
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.458
0.575
0.656
0.714
0.755
0.781
0.794
0.794
0.781
0.755
0.714
0.656
0.575
0.458
0.265
0.490
0.608
0.693
0.755
0.800
0.831
0.849
0.854
0.849
0.831
0.800
0.755
0.693
0.608
0.490
0.300
0.500
0.625
0.714
0.781
0.831
0.866
0.889
0.900
0.900
0.889
0.866
0.831
0.781
0.714
0.625
0.500
0.300
0.4
0.3
0.490 0.458
0.625 0.608
0.721 0.714
0.794 0.781
0.849 0.854
0.889 0.900
0.917 0.933
0.933 0.954
0.938 0.964
0.933 0.964
0,916 0.954
0.889 0.933
0.849 0.900
0.794 0.854
0.721 0.781
0.625 0.714
0.490 0.608
0.265 0.458
0.173
0.2
O. I
0.400
0.575
0.693
0.781
0.849
0.900
0.938
0.964
0.980
0.985
0.980
0.964
0.938
0:900
0.849
0.781
0.693
0.575
0.400
0.300
0.520
0.656
0.755
0.831
0.889
0.933
0.964
0.985
0.995
0.995
0.985
0.964
0.933
0.889
0.831
0.755
0.656
0.520
0.300
0
0.436
0.600
0.714
0.800
0.866
0.917
0.954
0.980
0.995
1.000
0.995
0.980
0.954
0.917
0.866
0.800
0.714
0.600
0.436
0
Ifax max and ay max are of opposite slgn (tension or compression) read the values of
'txy max startmg
. f rom the negatlve
. vaIues 0 fOX max
'txya
.
xa
Note : From table T.3-4.5. I.I it can be seen that in groups EI and E2 much higher stresses than
those usually permitted in structures are quoted. These values are theoretical values obtained by
. extrapolation of the test results on higher groups (E3 to E8) with medium or severe notch cases
(K2, K3 and K4). Therefore there is no nero to atlach any material significance to these values in
brackets, consideration of which could in some cases lead to the conclusion that an assembly of type
. KO or KI could resist fatigue better than the unwelded metal (case WO). This apparent anomaly
iIIustrates the weIl known fact that it is not always necessary to carry out fatigue checks for the
lower groups withslight or moderate notch effect classes.
.
For thepurpose of calculation it must be remembered that these theoretical Ow values are used only
to detennine the pennissible fatigue stresses 0xa, 0ya and 't xya for use in the formula which covers
the case of combined loads.
..:1
3-59
WELDS
Tensile and compressive loads in weids
Weids subject to fatigue under tensile and compressive loads are checked using the same permissible
stresses as those of the metal joined. Tables T.3-4,5.3.1 to T.3~4.5.3.:t give the permissible stress
according' to K and the group of the component.
Note: ,The Iimits indicated under 3-2.2.2 for certain particular cases of transverse tension and
compression in weid seams must be observed.
'
Chapter,3-2.2.3 gives, in addition, some indications for the determination of the stresses in the weid
seams.
b)
c)
Combined loads
The method set out above for structural members is used when considering the effect of fatigue in
weid seams subjected to variabie combined loads.
'3-4.5.2.2
BOLTED,J'OINTS
A) , PRECISION BOLTS
a)
The permissible shear stresses for fatigue in bolts are fixed by multiplying the permissible stresses
intension for case W2 by :
0.6 forsingle shear
0.8Jor double shear
The permissible bearing pressure values are obtained by multiplying ihe permissible shear values in
the bolts by 2.5.
'
The permissible fatigue stresses are given directly, according to factor
stresses) on the following tables :
.. ./
3-60
FEM Section II
- single and double shear in fitted bolts, grade 4.6 and 5.6 for groups E5 to E8, table T.3-4.5.3.6
bearing stresses for fitted bolts, grade 4.6 and 5.6 for single and double shear and for groups E5
to E8, table T.3-4.5.3.?
.
Fl ob
+Sb
where:
O"p
Sb'
ob
O"a is the amplitude of the maximum pennissible stress for fatigue given in the following graph
3-4.5.2.2.
For any other type of bolt or design method the O"a value should ensure at least an equivalent level
of safety against fatigue.
Any confonnity tests should be carried out according to ISO specification ISO 3800/1 (Threaded
fasteners - Axial load fatigue testing - Panl : Test methods) with O"m = 0.8 RE (RE = o"E).
..J
FEMSection II
3-61
Graph 3-4.5.2.2
crA (N/mm 2)
,<
IU~
121
""- ,
"
", , , ~l-r"-."
" , , " ,,~------"
"-
_.-:-..-'. - -.-:lt3
lU
sa
85
7S
"
56
r--.., ,
,,
103
'
...
EI
EZ
~------90
."
E3
'--------78
.
E4
6ll
59
52
45
.,
E5
E6
E7
E8
..
M42
dtlmml
- standard thread
- classes 8.8, 10.9, 12.9
- cold rolled thread with heat treatment after rolling.
.../
3-62
FEM Section TI
Tables T.3-4.5.2.3
CASES OF NOTCH EFFECT
In the tables below the various joint details are c1assified in terms of the magnitude of the notch effect they
produce.
It should be noted that, for. any given weId, the notch effect differs according to the type of loading to
which the joint is subjected.
For example, a fi11et welded joint is c1assified under case Ka for longitudinal tension or compression loads
(ref.0.31) or longitudinal shear (ref. 0.51),. and under cases K30r .K4 for transverse tension or
compression loads (ref. 3.2 or 4.4):
Wo
Descriotion
Parent metal, homogeneous surface. Part
without joints or breaks in continuity
(solid bars) and without notch effects
unless the laner can he defined by
calculation
. F!Ure
Svmbol
/v
Case W1.
Reference
W1
Descriotion
Part drilled for riveting or bolting with
rivets and bo1ts loaded up to 20 % of
permissible values. Parts dri11ed for joints
using high strength bolts (Cl. 3-2.3.4)
loaded up to 100 % or permissible values
(Cl. 3-2.3.3)
Figure
Svmbol
~I
.~I
'#"-0-/. -
- - t~~
.
..
.'
.. ./
- 3-63
FEM Section II
Figure
Description
Reference
Svmbol
..
W2.1
W2.2
W2.3
-m~
d IIt ~
--
Ijtr~?":n
~ ~
'
I'
. I
J".\
.....--.....
:
~'$
",~
--- I--~
'.
'"
2 - WELDED PARTS
Case
Reference
Des~ription
. Symbol
see page
.Figure
3-14
,0.1
..
~ ...
/.,
0.11
,_.
,--- ~.
y
~-
-I
1...,
0.12
. '
,
(!
:\
,i-=
----""I
~-~
_'Z-...
'...9_.
. "
I .
,-zr-'
.. --
"_.
'.
0.3
.~.
'/
,(-.'
-~
P100,
1(
~.
~~i
.'
-,:,.,
Pl00
)(
0.13
~
P100
.~
P 100
).(
PfOoLp
X'
.. ./
3-64
FEM Section II
Reference
0.33
Ba
0.5
'.0.51
..
!: :': :~:
f,i::
:~:', :,:,;:1
see page
3-14
L~~~P"I
~;~
0.31
0.32
Symbol
Figure
Description
\t
PIOOI-?,
)(
K
~
~
[p [F
~
PIQO! p.
.K
~
1.1
. 1.11
1.12
Symbol
Figure
DescriDtion
/~
.
,
~
..
:PfOO!-P.
)(
3-
....
LCD~
~
PfOO!-P.
X
~.
P100lR
1<.
.../
FEM Section II
3-65.
Case KI
Reference
. Figure
Description
see page
3-14
. 1.13
1.2
1.21
1.3
1.31
-~-
~'
:PIOO!- P
om
v
X
'.~.'
.
....
-i
Description
Symbol.
Figure
see page
3-14
2.1
--E
-..!Q..
d--
V
Pl00f.P
'X
.. ./
3-66
FEM Section II
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.2
2.21
2.3
Description
Symbol
Figure
see page
3-14
~
PlOOI- p
'"
~
PIOO
'Y
,..-0
r---,.
r--
---1
r -c:::::
"
!-
L--J
P 100
.~
~
/
10 orJ
I
~':vt""'IJ"'!JzZ i
.. ./
3-67
FEM Section TI
Reference
2.31
Description
see page
3-14
.L
~
,P,.
2.33
Symbol
Figure
..<
J.-
. '~:~
2.34
2.4
2.41
2.5
.~~
~~.
~.
.L
./.D
'\
4('
'\
.LU
Description
Symbol
Figure
see page
3-14
'r]
3,1
-I;;; ::t
1'-
'4
P+(P
.. ./
3-68
FEM Section II
Reference
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.2
3.21
3.3
3.31
Description
Bult-weid with backing strip and no
backing run.
(Backing strip secured by intermittent tack
weldsinside tbe bevel)
Symbol
Figure
see page
3-14
mi
---
~
Ptooj.p
mI Dl
.. ./
FEM Section n
3-69
Case K3 - Severe stress concentration (continued)
Reference
3.32
Description
Symbol
Figure
see page
3-t4
....
lIJ
3.33
3.34
.3.36 .
3.4
3.41
~I
. .
-bt
::H:::;
Ow
I~
K
K
.. ./
3-70
FEM Section II
Description.
Symbol
Figure
see page
3-14
3.5
'M / V
3.7
:.
t{
' :-..,, n
,/
...
--
J-
--~_~
Description
Symb,()l
Figure
see pag
3-14
4.1
1--
p-
r---
4.11
--I
J(
--I I I l -
p-
'---
4.12
4.21
..
Continuous member tathe sides of which
are welded parts ending at right angles,
parallel ta the directian of the farces
4.3
-.
4.31
-+~
~j[[]W
~
:
- _.
-~-
Lh.
~/
Lh-
/
.. ./
FEM Section
3-71
Case K3 - Very severe stress concentration (continued)
Reference
4.32
4.35
4.36
~I
4.5
=::;,.
t::
CO
I~
..
~~
DES
.
l~
~.
~---~~ V
/~
4.41
LJ
~~~.
m;;/J
..
4.4
'!.'
,/
4.34
. ISO 2553
c}/~
4.33
Symbol
Figure
DesCriotion
..
4.7
....~~
- - -......- --.
"
--
-------
.. ./
3-72
FEM Section II
ES
E6
E7
E8
Table
Table
Table
Table
T.3-4.S.3.]
T.3-4.S.3.2
T.3-4.S.3.3
T.3-4.S.3.4
Table T.3-4.5.3.S.
Table T.3-4.S.3.6
- Bearing stresses for fitted bolts for single and double shear :
. Components of groups ES to E8
Table T.3-4.S.3.7
.. ./
\"
;
FEM Section TI
3-73
Table T.3-4.S.3.1
PERMISSIBLE FATIGUE STRESSES
Tension and compression in tbe material and in tbe weId seams
for construction cases Wo to W2 and Ko to K4
and forsteels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe SlO
COMPONENTS OF GROUP ES
N/ara
250
/'\
v
.$)
/ ' r'P"
'l!Y ":/
/'
Z
0
'H
./
CI)'
Cl)
;"
vr . / V
V ....... V ........ V
0...
:I:
0
e.-
~ ~.
/'
. ~'L
~ ./
---
Cl)
....;.--r-
Eo-<
.0-- .
Z
0
Cl)
I--
"i"
l-100
--
....... .......
430)
160 N/mm
//
(Fe
/ / ::J
hV
./
~L.
~
(Fe
1//
/
":~
c-
187 N/mm 2
/.
./
(Fe 510)
1
11 .~
150 ~
/
/
./
/'\
/'"
240 N/mm
1/
V/
/'
V ~.
~r
~P""
~/ V;" ~
1/
. /V
' / ./
/"
/' 200-
/'
./
V
. / V /'
./ ./ /'
360)
50
Eo-<
v
~.-:.
- 0
8 .
- 0 2
- 0 4
- 0 6
Otl
014
1 IC'
/'\
--
Z
0
H.
Cl)
--
Eo-<
I---
/'\
50
-......
-r---
-.......
CI).
0..
:I:
0
;--...... ~~
-....;::
............
r--.... . . i"-...........
P::
Z
0
........
Cl)
Cl)
..........
-.....::::
........ ,,"'-...
..~
........
......... k~-""';:
........
'-'::: ~
........
........
f'..........
.y~
""
I"...fQ
:I:
0
I'\..
"
"'-
"""" .,
""
"
'\
"
.""-.
'"
"'- E"\.
'\
'\
"
,,'\.
'\
"'-
'"t\
- 18 7 N/=2
(Fe
.~
1\
360)
160 N/mm-
,?J--
" 1"'\
250 2
N/mm
(Fe
-
\.'\
20<
f'..;." ~
t"-..
""
"f:0t..
"-"":"-
-lS(
:--..
Ik.
K.
~"":::}~c?
........
P::
0..
~:
r'---.
~ :o-.~
10
r---...
I--.
r--.....
............
H
Cl)
~
........ ~~
- 240
(Fe
430)
3-74
FEM Section
Table T.3-4.5.3.2
PERMISSIBLE FATIGUE SffiESSES
Tension and compression in the material and in the weId seams
for construction cases Wo to W2 and KO to K4
and for steels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510
COMPONENTS OF GROUP E6
240 N/rm/
/"
I/V
/v
l't}Y
200
(Fe 510)
V/:/
V/
Atl /'
/
I
:/
ti)
ti)
187 N/mm 2
(Fe 430)
IJ
1//
~
~
160 N/If1IIl~
jV/
p...
:I:.
(Fe 360)
/J,
ti)
1--1-'_:---
L..--
100
I--
E-->
~
_I--
----
ti)
E-->
50
v~-!--4--+---I-~-+--+-if-+-+-l-+-+--t--t---r-r-I-t1
IC""': 1
-08
-06
-04
-02
-r--r--. .
50
Cl)
E-->
Cl)
Cl)
~
p::;
p...
:I:
Cl)
Cl)
~
p...
:I:
'-t--..
012
1 1('-
FEM Section TI
3-75
Table T.3-4.5.3.3
PERMISSIBLE FATIGUE STRESSES
Tension and compression in thematerial and in the weId seams
for construction ases Wo to W2 and Ka to 1<4
and for steels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510
COMPONENTS OF GROUP E7
N/rr<II
250
z
o
VoO
[I)
[I)
~V
::c
o
po-
[I)
Z
W
. ,
Eo-<
--
....-..:::::: :;:-[....--
-- -
po-
t"""_
P::
...-. t:::<"
.,.
[I)
~,
l.-'/:
V
.-
~ 'ol1- ~
I-:;::::::::r-
---
l.--"""
:.--
~I'"
~ r!50
1<.....
'1..1
Eo-<
./
f-""'""
--
./
100
l.'l"
I
/
1/
/
IV
W
~
/
I/h
1//
~ '/
~ V/
~
/;; .;>
~
V
IJ,187 N/=2
. '(Fe 430)
160 N/rrm'
(Fe 360)
!.a
./
.-
'A
~v
.... ,
1/
(Fe SlO)
/V
~r-
/' / /
/'
/""-
0
k""
I./' ........::: %
,......
1-0
r--
H.
V..........
-;:::. Kl\.
~.
~v
/"
200
~..... , / /
./
..
P-i .
'/
/'
IL
, 240 N
//
./
./
A V
V
P""
~ 15
'-- ~
v
.~
~"': 1
.
o 8
- 0 6
- 0 4
zo
t-
[I)
.-
r--
Eo-<.
A ..
.J!.?...> ~
r--
[I)
[I)
~ .......
0..
::Co
o
u
~
o
z
r--.
...........
-........;;: ~
~o
.......
r--.......,.......
~ ~.
~
""- ~ ............. ~
:--.....
"
I~
~~
"'
............
1"-
1 ';1
.... l~
"'
""'\
,~ J
"":
"'\~
'"
.'\
.r
"-
~......... l"-
1"-
..........
"""
.....
""
............
- 1
1\\
- 187 N/mm'
_1
.:
(Fe 430)
"\
~
'\
,(F
'1\
,,,,,,- ~
...
\\ 1\
"- r\,
''1. ..,
............
20<
.\
,"\.
1\\'\'
~~
~"-
\
~
r--..
, ......
""
10<
I""" I..........
........... fi'"
"-
0..
::c
o
"'\ -Yn
IK"
r--
...........
"'
r.........
""'S ~
,,",\
[I)
[I)
1<"
.f"?
..........
50
I-
r---..
I...................
r--
........
=
"'- ~
o tz
-:--...,
. .
r-- r-.
- 0 2
1\
\
- 24 o N/rim-
( Fe 510)
':-"
250,
. N/rm1
.Y
3-76
FEM Section TI
Table T.3-4.S.3.4
PERMISSIBLE FATIGUE STRESSES
Tension and compression in the material and in the weid searns
for construction cases Wo to W2 and Ka to K4
and for steels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510
COMPONENTSOFGROUPE8
/'
1 I1
/11
Cl)
200
Z
rxl
/'
.,/
E-<
///
(Fe: 510)
v / " / :/
240 N/rrm
I""~\)o
Cl)
Cl)
rxl
p:;
0..
~
p:;
.--
.---
~V
/W
1///
'H
Cl)
Cl)
rxl
_L.---r- .
p:;
0..
_1--1---
... ,.
-o~
z
o
Cl)
Cl)
rxl
p:;
0..
-06
04
- 0 2
o 8
11('
--
p:;
o
z
Cl)
Cl)
p:;
p;,
~
t>
.. ./
FEM SectionII
3-77
TabieS T.3-4.5.3.5
PERMISSmLE FATIGUE STRESSES
for shear in parent metal and in weid seams steels Fe 360, Fe 430 and Fe 510
and for components of grOUPS E5 to EB
.
Shear in parent metal
N/rrm
200
150
.....
v---
.ES
--
[:::7
1,....-7
~
E-'
0_ :..-:-~
E7:. F""" --== I---
( Fe 510)
.-
---
j./
-----
t:?"
............
( Fe 430)
.-V
100
1 38.5 N/rrrm z
107.8 N//f11JJ2 .
( Fe 360) =
9 2.3 N/mm 2
.-1--'
L-50
- 0.8
- 1
- 0.4
- 0.6
- 0.2
o6
04
0.2
0,8
NI_ 2
200
ES
E6
E7
EB
---
...--
I---"
- --
I----"'""
~
./
--
.....-"
c:::::::
-- ~.
---
po-
---
15<1
/'
./
:;..
r7
170 N/mm 2
./
(Fe 430)=
132 N/mm 2
V............
(~e 360)
113 N/,m,2
k%/
100 ~.
--
./
........ V
:,./
.----
j.....--"'
--1-
50
---
-_.~
-_.
1-
- 1
- O,s.
- 0,6
- 0,4
- 0,2
(Fe 510)
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
.. ./
3-78
FEM Section IJ
Tables T.3-4.5.3.6
PERMISSIBLE FATIGUE STRESSES
Shear in fitted bolts - grade 4.6 and 5.6
for groups E5 to E8
lI/no
200
.- -
:.....-
150
./
../
r:=-
--
:..- ~
~ r=:::::::: p
--::
~ f--
.--
t::::-- :::::--
::..-::::: ~
- 1
- 0,8
- 0,6
--:: ~
~
l..--
~-
~.
- 0,4
--
./
../
I
<:_ _-,--=-I~SO~f.:::i=-t~bo~lt=-:-....:Ho.:;.l:.:1:.:...:..:k.;..6
0,6
0,4
BIl/hll.
02
0,8
=-:=..:...===-_---:-
...,--_><.
>
r- ---4---iES ~
E6
.
E7
::::-1;2: I---"" ~ ~
_
:-.:::::: ~
_.
~.
~J--
~::;..- t- ..,,-:::;;:;:::::
---~
ES _
e..--
~p--
~. ______
.- -. -
__
__ - 1 - -
__
f-
------f---.---
._....
-- _ ..__._ ...__
. __._. .__
-- ..-
~.
/ - - - - f . - - j - - - - _.-
- - - ---
---
- 0,0
--
- 0,6
-0,1.
-o.'z
o
><.
Bolt 4.6
9 6 tI/am 2
./
50
0,2
.-/
100 V
.-~
~ r:-- r-:::..:-:::: ~ i.--""'"
-- -- -.- V-
Bolt 5.6
1 44 Nhnn'
~I.::I1:.:1:.:./.:..:h.=.1l=_. _ _-'-_-"-_
..
.. ./
. FEM. Section n
3-79
Tables T.3-4.5.3.7
PERMISSffiLE BEARINGSTRESSES
for fitted bolts grade 4.6 and 5.6
for ~oups E5 to EB
Single sbear joint
rf/an'
500
,',,"
400
Bol1:
--- -
_f-
I---
ES ::.
E6 E7
-- '-
:--:: ~ ~
EB .
5.6 =
315 N/mm 2
-'"
~
..
;,...
v-
.'-1710
./
-'"
/'
V".
Bo
l--"
te .
4.6=
210 N/mm 2
V-
l---
I--
100
- 1
- 0,8
- 0.6
- 0,4
. ISO
- 0.2
0.2
0,4
Hn/k6
0,6
0,8
HU/hU
(---------..:...-_-----><:--------------'---->
Bolt
./.
/1"-00
V
......
I.--'
.;.--
---
E7~ :::-Efl- f - -
I---
::.---
- --
.....-: :::;;:;---
..-
L---
.---
/""
/'
v:
L----"""
V'.-
V'
/'
./
;/
./
/
300 ~
Bol ~
200
--I - -- -
1-
0,6
0,8
- --
100
f~
- 0,8
- 0,6
. ISO
- 0,4
HU/kb
- 0,2
. 4.6 =
280 N/mm
1.,.../
~-
./
/'
/'
/'
5.6
420 N/mm
0,2
HU/hU
.. ./
3-80
3-5
FEM Section 11
......
.or
.. ./
._~
FEM Section II
3-81
3-6'
where
Ms
is the'stabilizing moment of the total permanent load G referred to a possible tipping axis
Mk
is the overtuming moment resulting fromall the variablehorizontal and vertical forces
(1:PH + 1:Py) of load cases I, 1I and III, to the extent these forces increase the overtuming moment.
The check must be carried out for the tipping axis with the smallest overtuming safety, by assuming that
the mvable parts of the dead load are in the most 'unfavourable position.
The same safety regarding overtuming can be written in the following form :
Ms
f
vK=- =Mk
e
where
f isthe horizontal distance of the center of gravity of the dead load G with respect to a possible
overtuming axis
and
e is calculated from the following formula :
e,
1:PH . h + 1:Py . (a + f)
G + 1:Py
where
h is the vertical distance of the sum of all (1:PH) from the tipping axis
a is the horizontal distance of the sum of all the vertical forces (1:Py) from the tipping axis.
The following safeties against overtuming are at least request for the loadcases I to III :
.. ./
3-82
FEM Section II
Table T.3-6.1
Ms
.
SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNING vK ::: Mk
Load case
vK
I
II
1.50
1.30
1.20
~PH
IPy
End view
I
G+lJ~
G-tLPvtIfij
a
A
AB
Plan
In agreement witb tbe user, it can be specified tbat for special situations, some structural mernbers must
occupy defmite positions, taking into account tbe stability of tbe appliances when idle or out of service
(for example : rec1aimer boom). Such measures must appear in tbe operating instructions.
.../
FEM Section 11
3-7
3-83
=0.14
=0.25
Note : the values of friction coefficients given above are greater thant the minimum values of
chapter 2-4.2.1 since they c,?rrespond to a statie state.
The safety regarding drifting must be :
a)
during operation, when only the automatic brakes of the drive motors act, in case of wind induced load,
according to 2-2.2.1.2 : v ~ 1.30,
b)
-000-
.. ./
Chapter 4
. . FEM Section II
CHAPTER 4
CALCULATION AND CHOICE OF MECHANISM COMPONENTS
CONTENTS
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
Checking for ultimate strength
Value of the perrnissible stress
Values of the coefficient vR
.Relations between the calculated stresses and the perrnissible stresses
- Choice of ropes
Rope diameter
.. Maximum tensile fore S
.. Practical factor of safety Zp
.. Minimum breaking load F o
.. Rope diameter selection .
Clause
Paoe
-=-==.
4-1
4-3
4-1.1
4-1.1.1
4-1.1.2
4-1.1.3
4-3
4-3
4-3
4-4
4-1.2
4-4
4-1.3
4-1.3.1
4-1.3.2
4-1.3.3
4-1.3.4
4-1.3.5
4-1.3.6
4-1.3.7
4-4
4-5
4-6
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-12
4-12
4-1.4
4-14
4-2
4-14
4-2.1
4-2.1.1
4-2.1.2
4-2.1.3
4-14
4-14
4-14
4-2.2
4-2.2.1
4-2.2.1.1
4-2.2.1.2
4-2.2.1.3
4-2.2.1.4
4-15
4-15
4-2.3
4-2.3.1
4-2.3.1.1
4-2.3.2
4-2.3.3
4-15
4-16
4-16
4-17
4-17
4-18
4-18
4-18
4-19
4-19
.. .I
FEM Section II
4-2.4
4-2.4.1.1
4-2.4.1.2
4-2.4.1.3
4-2.4.1.4
4-2.4.\.5
4-2.4.2
4-20
4-20
4-21
4-21
4-22
4-23
4-24
4-24
4-2.5
4-25
4~2.4.1
- Design of gears
APPENDIXES
Detennination of pennissible stresses in mechanism components subjected
to fatigue and example of ca1culation
; .
A.4-U
4-26
4-34
List of some works dealing with fatigue problems
4-34
.. .I
FEM Section IJ
4-1
4-3
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
Mechanism components are designed by checking that they offer adequate safety against failure due to
. fracture, crippling, fatigue or excessive wear.
Other factors must also be taken into consideration and it is particularly important to avoid overtheating or
deflection which could interfere with correct functionning of the mechanism.
a a-- -
where:
OR
vR
Table TA-I.I.2
Values ofvR
case of loading
value ofvR
2.2
1.8
In the case of grey cast iron, the values of vR are to be multiplied by 1.25.
..ol
FEM Section II
4-4
I)
Pure tension :
1.25 at::; aa
2)
Pure compression :
ac::; aa
3)
Pure bending :
af::; aa
4)
1.25 at + af::; aa
5)
ac + af::; aa
6)
Pure shear:
Vi
7)
8)
or::; aa
.../
.FEM Section 11
4-5
I(
between the minimum and maximum stresses which occur during the varibus stress
The fatigue strength of a complete mechanical component is known only in exceptional cases.
Generally speaking, it has to be derived from the characteriSlics ofthe material and the component
and from accepted laws concerning their behaviour.
The starting point is provided by the endurance limit under alternating tensile fatigue loading
(I( = -1) of a polished specimen, made from the material under consideration. The reduction of this
fatigue strength as a result of the geometric shape of the piece, its surface condition, its state of
corrosion and its size isallowed for by introducing appropriate factors.
From the endurance limit under altemating loading the corresponding limit with respect to other
values of I( can be obtained with the aid of a Smith diagram, in which cenain hypotheses are made
as to the shape of the strength curve.
The endurance limtit thus deterrnined for the actual component, with respect to a given ratio I(
between extreme stresses, is taken as the basis for plotting ihe Whler curve. From this Whler
curve (fatigue strength underthe effect solely of stress cycles, all having the same ratio I( between
extreme stresses), and by using the Palmgren-Miner hypothesis on fatiguedarnage accumulation,
the fatigue strength of a component can be deterrnined according to the component group in which it
is classified.
This method for deterrnining the fatigue strength is applicable only to components in which the
structure of the material is .homogenous over lhe' entire section being considered.. It cannot,
therefore, be used in thecase of components which have undergone a surface .treatment (e.g.
hardening, nitriding, casehardening). In such cases the fatigue strength can be derived from the
Whler curve only if the latter has itself been deterrnined for components which have been made
from the same material, h~ve a comparabIe shape and size and have undergone exactly the 'same
surface treatment.
Checking for fatigue strength only needs to be performed for load case I.
.../
4-6
FEM Section II
The values given for abw are generally Ihose corresponding slalislically 10 a 90 % survival
probability. In the case ofcarbon sleels commonlyused in mechanisms, il is pennissible 10 adopt :
abw
= 0.5 aR
*(1) An element of material, when subjecled to the same stress as <in adjacent element, supports the latter
less effectively than if it were subjected to a lower stress, as is the case with bending. A stress
gradient, i.e. :
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
4-7
Table TA-I.3.2.a
Characteristics of some commonly used steels
Ultimate strength (jR, yield strength (jE and faligue strenglh (jbw. al room temperature. For other
steels or others temperalures, refer to the relevanl slandard.
Note: The new european standards under preparalion give comparison lables for steel grades
between european slandards, ISO 683 - 1 (\987) and olher anterior national standards.
.
We give, in appendix, at the end of chapter 4, a comparison tble taken from EN 10 083 - I.
order
1
2
3
symbols
Fe 360 B
A St 41
'St 50
ISO 630
DIN 17 135
Fe 510 C
ISO 630
5
6
7
SI 60
SI 70
C 35 N
DIN 17 100
DIN 17 100
DIN 17200
C 35 VCk 35 V
DIN 17200
C 45 N
DIN 17200
10
C 45 V Ck 45 V
DIN 17200
11
C 60N
DIN 17200
12
C 60 V Ck 60 V
DIN 17 200
13
34 CrMo 4
ISO 683-1
14
34 CrMoS 4
ISO 683-1
15
42 CrMo 4
ISO 683-1
16
42 CrMoS 4
ISO 683-1
17
50 CrMo 4 N
ISO 683-1
50 CrMo 4 V
16 <
40 <
d < 16
d $40
d $60
DIN 17 100
18
<iE (*1)
[N/mm 2)
according 10
ISO 683-1
d $16
16 < d $30
30 < d <50
16 <
40 <
d $16
d $40
d<100:
16 <
40 <
d < 16
d $40
d$100:
16 <
40 <
d $ 16
d $40
d$100:
16
40
100
160
<
<
<
<
d
d
d
d
d
$16
$40
$100 :
$ 160 :
$250 :
16
40
100
160
<
<
<
<
d
d
d
d
d
$16
$40
$100 :
$ 160 :
<250 :
16
40
100
160
<
<
<
<
d $16
d $40
d $ 100 :
d$160:
d $250 :
(jR
[N/mm 2)
240
260 .
250
240
300
360
350
340
340
370
280
430
370
330
340
490
420
380
390
580
500
400
380 (*3)
800
680
570
520
470
400 (*3)
900
780
650
570
520
430 (*3)
900
800
700
650
600
370
410
500
520
600
700
500.
630
590
550
600
710
670
630
700
850
800
750
650
1,000
900
800
750
700
700
1,100
1,000
900
800
750
750
1,100
1,000
900
850
800
<ibw (*2)
[i'!/mm 2)
185
205
200
195
250
260
255
250
300
350
250
315
295
275
300
355
335
315
350
425
400
375
325
500
450
400
375
350
35.0
550
500
450
400
375
375
550
500
450
425
400
../
4-8
FEM SectionII
Table TA-I.3.2.b
Characteristics of some commonly used cast materials
Ultimate strength (jR, yield strength (JE and fatigue strength (jbw at the nonnal ambiant
temperature. For other cast materiaIs or others temperatures refer to the relevant standards.
order
symbols
<JE (*1) .
according to
[N/mm 2]
19
20
21
22
GS-45
GS-60
GS-70
GS-34 CrMo 4 V
23
GS-42 CrMo 4 V
24
25
26
GGG-42
GGG-60
GGG-70
DIN 1681
30 <
30 <
DIN I 693
230
300
420
s <30
520
s < 100 : 450
s :530 : 550
s :5100 : 500
280
420
500
(jR
<Jbw (*2)
[N/mm 2)
[N/mm 2]
450
600
700
750
700
750
700
420
600
700
210
300
350
.. ./
FEM Section II
4-9
<Jwk=
. Obw
kskdku(c)
or
.'w
'wk = -ks-.kd-.k-u-(c-)
Fig.4-1.3A expresses, in the form of a Smith diagram, the hypotheses made concerning"'the
relationship between the endurance limit <Jd (or 'd) and the ratio I( between the extreme stresses.
This gives the following relations :
-1$10
5
<Jd = 3 - 2
alternati ng stresses
awk
I(
normal stresses
3"<J w k
0$1($1
<Jd =
-J
aR
1 - [I
-I $10
pulsating stresses
3"a w k
5
'!d = 3 - 2 I(
.1(
alternating stresses
Twk
.,
shear stresss
.(
..
5
O$I(~I.
3"'wk
'd =
I - [1
pulsating stresses
}V3'Wk
<JR
.1(
in which
aR
= tensile strength of the material
<Jwk and 'wk = endurance limit of the component under alternating loading,
I(
= -I
.. ./'
4-10.
FEM Section II
Figure 4-1.3.4
aT
//.
Cl
(AverageJ
//
a.W~
or
= tg lp
= tg lp
or
Vi) -
../
FEM Section TI
4-11
- for n ~ 2 . 106
or
Figure 4-1.3.5
cp
:
I
I
I
I
I
----------+-------------------------~------------------~,----------I
I
I
.: D
:
I'
I
I
810'
...
n (lg).
The spectrum factor ksp of the component (see section 2-1.4.3) is detennined by mans of the above
mentioned va1ue of c.
.../
4-12
FEM Section II
ak
= (2
'tk
= (2
-U.
) . ad
-U.
or
). 'td
The classification of components, grouped on the basis of theirtotal duration of use N and their
spectrum factor k sp , as weil as the critical fatigue stresses associated with each group, is illustrated
in figure 4-1.3.6 where ajk represents the critical stress applying to group Ej. For the critical shear .
stresses, the letter a must be replaced by 't.
vk
=3.2 c
'tk
'taf =vk
and one verifies that :
$ aaf
't $ 'taf
with
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
4-13
Figure 4-1.3.6
k,p=1 0.5
(P4) (P3)
0.25
(P2)
0.125
(PI)
,
---------- ----- ---- -----
,,
I
"
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
,
,
I
1
"
I
I
I
----------T----,
I
,
,
I
~---~----~-----L----J
I
"
I ,
I
I
,
,
~
I
,
I
I
----------t -----~----.~---.:~-----"~-~c----+----:.-+--~--:_-"""_7--I
----------~-----~----~-----~I~-~~-~-~~--~r_--_.--_r---,_----'
"
I
,
I
I
,I
' I
----------t-----~----i-----t----~--~~-~~-~~--_7----~---7_--,
I
,
,
I
----------~-----~----~-----~----~----~I~-~~-~----.:~---r_-~-"
,
I
I'
,
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
I
1
,
1
__
----------t-----~----~-----t----~-----1-----~,~--~----~~--.:~~--:_---
----------~-----~----~-----~--~-~-----~--~--~----~---:.--~--~~--~~---,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,.
I'
----------t-----~----~-----t----~-----1-----~----~-----~,---~----~--~~-,
,
1
,
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
8 lOl
,
I
I
I
1
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
1 lOG
2 lOG
4 lOG
8 lOG
N (log)
For components simultaneously experiencing both norma! and shear stresses with different ratios
between extreme stresses, the following condition must be satisfied :
in which:
<rx. <ry
'C
01cx, <rky
'Ck
If it is notpossible from this to determine the most unfavourable. case calculations must be
perforrned separately for the leads <rx max. <ry max and 'Cmax and the most unfavourable
corresponding stresses used.
lt should be noted that the checks described above do not guarantee safety against brittIe fracture.
Such safety can be ensured only by a suitable choiceof material quality",
.. ./
4-14
FEM Section II
4-2
Smean =
'fk; . Smax I
Specific case :
The bearings of travelling wheels are designed as follo~s :
The extreme loads Smax and Smin developed in loading case I are considered and the bearing is
designed for an equivalent mean load given by the expression :
Smean
2 Smax I + Smin I
. 3
.. .I
FEM Section II
4-15
lt is absolutely necessary for the bearing manufacturer to have, together with all these values, a c1ear
understanding as to the operation of the equipemnt and therefore of what the given values correspond
t~.
They do not purport to resolve every problem not to serve as a substitute for the dialogue which
essential between the rope manufacturer and the manufacturer of handling appliances.
IS
They apply to preferred ropes conforming to ISO recommendation 2408 "Stel ropes for general use _
.Characteristics".
They do not exclude, however, ropes which are not specified in ISO recommendation 2408, for which it is
incumbent upon the rope mamifacturer to validate for the user the minimum values of parameters detailed
i'n the ISO recommendation.
The terminology ofthe rope parameters complies with that used in ISO recommendation 2408.
The methods stated hereafter assume that the ropes are greased correctly, that the winding diameters of the
pulleys and the drums are suitably selected in compliance with 4-2.3 and that, when in service, the ropes
are properly maintained, inspected and periodically replaced in accordance with ISO recommendation 4309
"Rope inspection".
The selection of repe diameter (and winding diameters in 4-2.3) is based on the group of the mechanism.
.../
4-16
FEM Section IJ
Zp
FO
=s2: Zp min
The chosen rope must have a practical factor of safety at least equal to the minimum value Zp for
the mechanism group to which the rope in queslion belongs (see table TA-2.2.1.2).
Table T.4-2.2.1.2
group of mechanism
minimum value Zp
(running ropes)
MI
3.15
M2
3.35
M3
3.55
M4
M5
4.5
M6
5.6
M7
7.1
M8
. ./
FEM Section 11
4-17
Nevertheless in the cse" where the failure of a running rope (luffing mechanism for instance) would
affect the stability of the machine, these ropes must'be chosen with the following minimum safety
coefficients :
case
I and IJ
safety coefficient
6
6
3
Fa = d2 .!
. f . k . Ra = d2
4
K' .
Ra
where:
d
f
k
Ra =
and
K' =.! . f k
4
C=
Zp min
k . L
1t
4"' Ra
=VZp min
K' .
Ra
.. ./
4-18
FEM Section II
where Zpmin is the minimum value for running ropes in table T.4-2.2.1.2.
D~H.d
where:
D
H
d
is the winding diameter on pulleys, drums or compensating pulleys measured to the axis of the
rope
is a coefficient depending upon the mechanism group
is the nominal diameter of the rope.
IS
They correspond to ropes in common use and are based on experienee of their working conditions.
These guidelines do not however serve as substitute for the dialogue which is indispensable between
the rope manufacturer and the manufacturer of handling "appliances, especially when the use of new
ropes with non standard flexibility characteristics is being considered.
.../
FEM Section II
4-19
Table T.4-2.3.1.I
VALUES FH
mech~ism group
drums
.pulleys
MI
11.2
12.5
11.2
M2
12.5
14
12.5
M3
14
16
14
.M4
16"
18
14
M5
18
20
.14
M6
20
22.4
16
M7
22.4
25
16
M8
25
28
18
NOTE: When the fonnula given in c1ause 4-2.2.1 has been used to detennine.a minimum rope
diameter from which in turn the minimum diameters for drums and pulleys have been detennined, a
rope of diameter greater than the minimum calculated diameter can be used with these latter
diameters, provided that the diameter of the rope used does not exceed the minimum diameter by
more than 25 % and that the pull in the rope does not exceed the value S used for calculating this
minimum diameter.
.
=0.53 d
.../
4-20
FEM Section II
The coefficient of friction between the rope and the drum used in the calculations shall be :
Jl = 0.1
.when the rope is unwound from the drum for the length corresponding to the maximum service
position, at least two complete turns of rope must remain on the drum before the rope erXI
attachment.
Studies concerning the choice of rail wheels exist or are in progress, but the method given hereafter can be
. used as provedmethod which lead to satisfactory results in the case of handling machines.
P mean II
......:.;,;=;..;;.:,.
b . D
taking
Clmax = I.Z
and.
C2max = 1.15
and
P mean I
- - - ~ PL' Cl' Cz
b . D
.. ./
FEM Section n
4-21
where:
Pmean =
Pmin + 2Pmax
3
*(1)
*(1) For the same width of rail head, these forrnulae give a greaier useful bearing width for convex rails
than for flat rails. 1bis allows for the superior adaptation of a slightly convex rail to the rolling
motion of the wheel.
.
.../
4-22
FEM Section II
Table TA-2.4.1.3
VALUES OFpL
(JR
PL
.:.~.
in N/mm 2
>
500 N/mm 2
5.0
(JR
>
600
N/mm 2
5.6
(JR
>
700 N/mm 2
6.5
(JR
>
800 N/mm 2
7.2
(JR
>
1,000 N/mm 2
The qualities of material refer to cast, forged or rolled sleeIs, and spheriodal graphite cast iron.
In the case of rail wheel wilh steel tire, consideralion musl obviously be given
steel tire, which should be sufficiently thick not to roll itself out.
10
In the case of wheels made of high tensile steel and treated to ensure a very high surface hardness,
the value of PL is limited to that for the quality of the steel composing the wheel prior to surface
treatment, according to table T.4-2.4.1.3, since a higher value would risk causing premature wear of
the rail.
.
For a given load, however, wheels of this type have a much longer useful Iife lhan wheels of lesser
surface hardness, which makes their use worthwhile for appliances performing intensive service.
Altematively, it is possible to use wheels of ordinary cast iron, especially chilled cast iron, which
has good surface hardness.
It musl be remembered thaI such wheels are briltie and that their use should be avoided for high
speed motions or when shock loadings are anticipated.
:..I
FEM Section II
4-23
When these are used, their diameter is deterrnined by lakilig PL equallO 5 N/mm 2 .
~' ." I
wheel rolalion
speed in R.P.M.
Cl
200
160
125
112
100
90
80
71
63
56
0.66
0.72
0.77
0.79
0.82
0.84
0.87
0.89
0.91
0.92
wheel rotalion
speed in R.P.M.
wheel rolalion
speed in R.P.M.
Cl
50
45
40
35.5
31.5
28
25
22.4
20
18
0.94
0.96
0.97
0.99
Cl
16
14
12.5
1l.2
10
8
6.3
5.6
5
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.06
1.07
1.09
1.1
l.ll
l.l2
l.l3
l.l4
l.l5
l.l6
l.l7
Table T.4-2.4.I.4.b
VALUES OF Cl AS A FUNCTION OF THE WHEEL DIAMETER
AND THE SPEED OF' TRAVEL
wheel
diameter
inmm
10
12.5
16
200
1.09
1.06
1.03
250
1.11
1.09
315
1.13
400
20
25
31.5
40
50
63
80
100
125
160
200
250
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.72
0.66
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.72
0.66
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.72
0.66
1.14
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.72
0.66
500
1.15
1.14
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.72
630
1.17
1.15
1.14
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
0.77
710
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.1
1.07
1.04
1.02
0.99
1.96
0.92
0.89
0.84
0.79
~OO
1.17
1.15
1.14
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
0.82
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.1
1.07
1.04
1.02
0.99
0.96
0.92
0.89
0.84
1.17
1.15
1.14
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.87
1.16
1:14
1.13
1.12
1.1
1.07
1.04
1.02
0.99
0.96
0.92
0.89
1.17
1.15
1.14
1.13
1:11
1.09
1.06
1.03
0.97
0.94
0.9
900
1,000
1,120
1,250
.. ./
4-24
FEM Section II
In
table
Table T.4-2.4.1.5
VALUES OFC2
classes of Ulilization
C2
TO to T2
1.25
T3 to T5
1.12
T6
TI
0.9
T8 - T9
0.8
4-2.4.2 NOTES
The fonnulae apply only to wheels whose diameters do not exceed 1.25Q m. For larger diameters
experienee shows that the pennissible pressures between the rail and the wheel must be lowered.
The use of wheels of greater diameter is not recommended.
It should be noted that the limiting pressure PL is a notional pressure detennined by supposing that
contact between the wheel and the rail takes place over a surface .whose width is the useful width
defmed earlier (c1ause 4-2.4.1.2) and whose length is the diameter of the wheel. The calculation
method set out above is derived from the application of the Hertz fonnula, which may be wrillen :
~=
0.35 E
b D
where:
<Jcg
E
p
band D
.. ./
FEM Section 11
4-25
crc '
Taking KL.to represent the value o.3 fE which has the units of a pressure (in N/mm2), the relation .
may be wntten :
p
KL=:b.D
KL charactenzes the wheel pressure on the rail. The forrnula of clause 4-2.4.1 is obtained by
putting:
. ../
4-26
FEM Section II .
APPENDIX A 41.3
DETERMINAnON OF PERMISSmLE STRESSES IN MECHANISM
COMPONENTS SUBJECTED Ta FATIGUE
The endurance limit for a polished specimen is a laboratory va1ue, which is practically never attained in
parts actual1y used. Numerous factors - shape. size. surface condition (machining quality) and possible
corrosion - induce discontinuities resulting in stress concentrations or "notch effects", which increase the
actual stresses in the part. For a given section the load must therefore be reduced to maintain the actual
stress (including stress concentration effect) below any al10wable value. This is allowed by introducing
factors kso kd, ku. k uc (refer to 4-1.3.3). These factors are respectively all greater than or equa1 to unity. by
the product of which the endurance limit for a polished specimen is devided.
Guide1inesconceming the deterrnination of these coefficients are set out below:
A. DETERMINATION OF ks
This coefficient specifies the stress concentrations caused by changes of section at radii. annular grooves,
transverse holes keyways and other methods of securing hubs.
,
Figures A.4-1.3.1.a and b give the values of the shape coefficient k s , as a function of the ultimate strength
of the material, valid for a diameterD of 10 mmo
.
- The curves A.4-1.3.1.a give the coefficient k s for a change of section of ratio D/d = 2, with a correction
table T.AA-1.3.1 for other values of D/d.
Figure A.4-1.3.1.a
SHAPE COEFFICIENT ks (DIAMETER D - 10 mm)
CHANGE OF SECTION D/d = 2
-ITtE
./
./
V
:2.
~ I--
riJ
0:0.1
V
I....---- V
I~
=0
':Ic!
I-- v
I-- I-e--
':::=
./'
I--.,- l---
rIJ. .. o.~
OR N/mm1.
o
400
'00
800
iOOO
tlOO
.. ./
Datei registriert
fr TAKRAF
- Bestellung: 402095 - 1Lizenz(en)
FEM
SectionGmbH
TI
4-27
For other values of D/d r~ad ks from the curve (r/d) + q with the following values for q :
Table T.A.4-1.3.1
CORRECnON FACTORS ij FOR D/d ~ 2
D/d
1.05
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.6
0.13
0.1
0.07
0.052
0.04
0.022
- The AA-1.3.1.b curves give, for guidance sorne values ofks for holes, annulargrooves keywaysand pressfitted bubs.
Figure A.4-1.3.1.b
SHAPE COEFFICIENT k s (DIAMETER D = 10 mrn)
HOLE, ANNULAR GROOVE, KEYWAY, PRESS-FI1TED HUB
~I
r-bU~l ~l
~
V
2
1/
~ c:..- p
./"
o
4.00
Curve
I
TI
m
IV
V-
n
J-"""
I-- ~
wo
aoo
-t.JVo
~ t1/mm
1%00
.. ./
4-28
FEM Section II
. Table T.A.4-1.3.2
VALUES OF led
dmm
10
k<J
20
1.1
30
1.25
50
1.45
100
1.65
200
1.75
400
1.8
.,.
'.
2.
INFLUENCE OF CORROSION
Corrosion can have a very appreciable effect on the endurance limit of steels; this is allowed for by
applying a correction to factor ku which becomes kuc .
In the case of particular hazard or corrosion, the values f kuc to be used are those given for k u for
forged or rolled pieces and this without takinginto account the method of machining.
Obviously, the used of the factor kuc does not expect to take into account the effects of the possible
corrosion on the time, as for instance the reduction of the size of the structural components, effects
which must be taken into account separately. The factor kuconly take into consideration the fact
that the surface condition of the component subject to corrosion will be rapidly modified.
.../
I'
FEM Section II
4-29
Figure AA-l.3.2
VALUES OF THE MACHINING COEFFlCIENT ku (cORROSION COEFFlCIENT kuC>
Ku
3
I-----r-~r--r-_.--r__,_-,__r__"l
2,5
2.1---+--+--+--f--t-r~,.-L-+---t--j
1
400
bOD
Values of ku
Curve
na
llb
IIc
lId
Note : In the Case of hazard of corrosion, kuc must be chosen in curves Ik or Hd.
.../
4-30
FEM Section IJ
Example of application
A!!Cr>.__
---fH--_t
~
I"
Section A-B
D/d =70150 = IA
r/d = 5150 = 0.1
Determination ofks (shape)
For D/d = 1.4, we have:
q =0.04
(tabie T.A4-1.3.1)
= IA
(figure A4-I.3.1.a)
(tabie T.A4-1.3.2)
Determination of k u (machining)
For a part turned on a lathe, we have:
(figure A4-1.3.2
curve II)
.. ./
FEM Section IJ
4-31
awk
For
=1.4 . I ~:~ .
1.15
= 117.8 N/mm 2
= - I, we have:
IC
= 117.8 N/mm 2
c
=3.58
8-4
.Ok
=ad' 2
= 117.8 2(4/3.58)
=255.4 N/mm 2
= 1.38
255.4
aaf=T38
= ) 84.6 N/mm 2
Section C-D
We have:
k s = 2.2
kd = 1.45
ku = U5
Hence:
!Jwk=
c=
275
2.21.45 LIS
= 75.0 N/mm 2
awk
= 75.0 N/mm 2
=2.77
.. ./
4-32
Ok=
Gaf=
FEM Section II
75 . 2(4/2.77)
= 204.0 N/mm:!
3.21 12.77
= 1.52
204
1.52
= 134 N/mm 2
.. .I
4-33
FEM Section II
ANNEXE
. Comparison of ste'el grades as per the European standard EN 10083-1, the standard ISO 683.1
and other nationaI standards previously issued
EN 10 083-1
ISO 683.1
Germany
Finland
2 C 22
Abbreviated
desienarion
(Ck 22)
(LlL5I)
2 C 22
(Cm 22)
(LlI49)
1987
(I)
maleriaJ
2 C 25
(C 25 E4)
Cl 25
',LlI58
3 C 25
(C 25 M2)
Cm 25
LlI63
2 C 30
IC 30 E4'
CUO
LI 178
3 C 30
(C 30 M2)
Cm 30
LlI79
(070M20)
France
Spain
Sweden
SS-Stahl
Ahbre\"iatcd
dcsicnatitm
;\0.
ui
mJl(~rio1l
(XC 18J
(XCI8 uJ
(070M26)
1080M30,
(XC 25J
C:!5k
FI120
(XC 25 uI
C25k1
FII~511)
(XC 32J
(XC 32 uI
c 35
(C 35 H)
Ck 35
LlI81
3 C 35
I,C 35 M2)
Cm 35
LI 180
2 C 4U
IC 40 E4)
Cl 40
LlI86
3 C 40
(C 40 M21
Cm 40
LlI89
2 C 45
(C 45 E4"
Cl 45
LlI91
C45
3 C 45
(C 45 M2)
Cm 45
Ll201
Unitee
Kingdom
No. of
C 35
(U8UM36)
IXC38HII
1572
(XC 38 H lul
05k
FII30
C 35k-1
FFI1J5
lil
2 C 50
(C 50 H)
Ck 50
Ll206
3 C 50
(C 50 M21
Cm 50
Ll241
(08UM41ll
Cl 55
Ll203
(C 55 M2)
Cm 55
L1209
2 C 60
(C 60 E41
Cj 60
Ll221
((l70M611)
3 C 60
(C 60 M2)
Cm 60
Ll223
1070M6O)
28 Mn 6
(28 Mn 6)
(I5tJMI9)
Ll170
Ll7oo3
38 C,S 2
38 C,S 2
1.7023
46 C, 2
1.7006
46 ers 2
1.7025
'46 Cr 2
46 C,S 2
34 Cr 4
34 C,4
34 C,4
1.7033
34 CrS 4
34 C,S 4
34 C,S 4
1.7037
37 C,4
37 Cr 4
37 C,4
1.7034
37 C'S 4
37 Crs 4
36 C,S 4
1.7038
4) Cr';
41 C'4
41 C,4
1.7035
41.C,S4
41 C'S 4
41 Crs 4
1.7039
25 C,Mo 4
25 C,Mo 4
25 C,Mo 4
1.7218
25 C,MoS 4
25 C,MoS 4
25 CrMoS 4
1.7213
34 C,Mo4
34 C,Mo 4
34 CrMo 4
1.7220
34 CrMoS 4
34 C,MoS 4
34 C,MoS4
1.7226
42 C,Mo 4
42 C,Mo 4
42 C,Mo 4
1.7225
42 C,MoS 4
42 C,MoS 4
42 C,MoS 4
1.7227
(070M551
(5311M321
(530M36)
(530M4U)
25 CrMo 4
(708M25)
34 C,Mo4
l708M32)
42 C,Mo4
(708M4Ul
1.7228
(708M5O)
1.6511
(817M371
34 C,NiMo 6
(34 C,NiMo
61
131 C,NiMo
8\
(34 C,NiMo
6)
30C,NiMo 8
( 1.6582)
(51 Crv 4)
50 C,V 4
1.815
FII5t)
FII55(11
(32 C 4)
138 C 4)
38C,4
(38 C 4 uI
38C,4.1
42 C 4
GCr~
42 C..t u
12-15
25 C04
2:!25
134 CD 4)
-12 Cr4-1
FI2lJi
F1206
(I)
Fl202
F1207
(I)
223-1
(34 CD 3 uI
42 C04
22-W
42 CD 4 u
5OCrMo 4
5J C,V 4
C55k
C55k-1
25 CO 4 u
36 CrNiMo 4
1.6580
(XC 55 HIJ
(XC 55 H I uI
(32 C 4 uI
50 Crl'.!o 4
36 NiC,Mo J6
F114<l
FII45 tI)
(j8 C 2) .
36 CrNiMo4
30C,NiMo 8
C45k
C45k1
(38 C 2 uI
36 C,NiMo 4
50CrMo 4
1672
1674
(OBOM511)
(C 55 E4)
38 C, 2
(XC 48 HIJ
[XC 48 H I uI
2 C 55
28 Mn 6
(XC 42 Hl u)
(080M46)
3 C 55
38 C, 2
(XC42H IJ
34 C,NiMo 6
(8I7M40)
4lJC,Mo 4
FI252
40 CrM04-1
FI257 (I)
51 CrV 4
FI430
2541
1823MJO)
30CNO 8
(835M30)
35 CND 16
(735ASOJ
(50 CV 4)
(1) The use of steel grade in plain brackets means that itschemical composition is only slightly different
from that of EN 10083-1. The indication of a steel grade in square brackets means that its chemical.
composition differs JO a greater extent from that of EN 10083-1. Gracles which are neither in plain nor
s.quare brackets have vinually the same chemical composition as that of EN 10083- I.
...I
4-34
FEM Section II
Niemann, G. "Mascmnenelemente"
Band 1
Springer Verlag - BerlinlGttingenIHeidelberg - 1975
"Metal Fatigue" by JA Pope & Ph. D., D.Sc - Wh. Sch. I Mech.
E. Chapmann & Hall Ltd., 37 Essex street, London WC2
(5)
"La fatigue des mtaux" by R. Cazaud - Ingnieur Cnam ~ Doctor of the University of Paris - Lecturer at
the Higher Institute for Mechanical Engineering Materials - ConsuIting engineer
Dunod - 92 me Bonaparte - Paris
(6)
-000-
.. ./
i
.f
Chapter 5
SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
FEM' Section IJ
5-1
The Design rules developed particularly in chaplers 3 and 4 of this standard allow a mobile conlinuous bulk
handling machine to be designed and dimensioned correctly thereby ensuring the safety of lhe machine ilself
against lhe various causesof failure (breaking of major pans, loss of stability, elc).
In addition to these aspecls, careful consideralion should be given 10 the safety of persons who will have 10 work'
on the machine for ilS dtiving, operation and maintenance. This is covered by a number of 'provisions which,
while they often do nol affecl the strength of the machine, are nevertheless indispensable for safe operalion of lhal
machine.
For lhe health and safely requirements for mobile cominuous bulk handling equipment, in Europe. one shall refer
10 lhe following Direclives of lhe Council of lhe European Communilies :
- Machinery direclive No. 89/392fEEC of 141h June 1989; modified on 201h June 1991 (91/368fEEC), modified
on 141h June 1993 (93/44fEEC) and on 22nd June 1993 (93/68fEEC) ..
- Low voltage directive No. 73123IEEC of 191h February 1973 modified on 22nd July (93/68IEEC).
- Electromagnelic compalibility directive No. 89/336JEEC of lhe 3rd May 1989 modified on 281h April 1992
(92/3IfEEC) and on 22nd July 1993 (93/68IEEC).
For panicular applications one can refer 10 :
- Equipmenl and Prolective syslems inlended for used in
No. 94/91fEEC of the 23rd March 1994.
- Single pressure vessel directive No. 87/404fEEC of 251h June 1987 modified on 171h Seplember 1990
(90/488IEEC) and on 22nd July 1993 (93/68fEEC).
On the basis of lhe Machinery Direclive, the TechnicaJ Commitlee 148 of CEN "Conlinuous handling
equipmem and syslems - safely" has prepared a number of standards applicable 10 families of products involved in
conlinuous handling. These slandards are lhe following :
In Europe, t.is therefore desirabIe for the design of a mobile continuous bulk handling machine 10 refer 10 the
slandar~ prEN 618 (WG 3 - mobile mechanical bulk handling machines).
"
.. :/
.\
~i
5-2
FEM Section 11
In the most common case, when the machine includes one or more belt conveyors, there is need to refer also
the standard prEN62 (WG I - equipment for mechanical handling of both unit loads and bulk materials).
10 .
It should be noled Ihat Ihe European type C* safelY standards mentioned above include numerous references to
more generallype A, BI, B2 standards* and il may be necessary for a particular Iype of handling equipment 10
produce a colleclion of the parts of slandards which are appropriale la it.
Type B standards (group safety standards) dealing with one safety aspect or one type of safety re!ated device in
the same or a similar mannerfor a range ofmachiner)'
type BI sraruJnrds on panicular safetyaspects (e.g. safety distances, suiface temperature, noise)
- type B2 standards on safety relaud devices (e.g. two-hand contraIs, interlocking devices, pressure sensitfve .
devices. guards).
Type C standards (machine safety standards) giving detailed safety requirmentsfor a panicu!ar type of
machiner)' or group ofmachines defined in the scope ofthe standard.
(extract from the standard EN 292- I "Safety ofmachinery - Basic concepts, general principles for design)
~aOo-
.;,;<
Chapter 6
FEM Section II
CHAPTER 6
TESTS AND TOLERANCES
CONTENTS
TESTS
- Genera!
Typical acceptance tests
- Definitions
- Categories of tests
No load functional testing
Testing under nominal load
Overload testing
- List of typical checks and tests
6-1
6-3
6-I.l
6-3
6-1.2
6-3
6-1.3
6-4
6-1.4
6-1.4.1
6-5
6-6
6-1.4.2
6-1.4.3
6-6
6-1.5
6-7
6-2
6-8
6-2.1
6-2.1.I
6-8
6-8
6-2.2
6-2.2.1
6-2.2.2
6-2.2.3
6-2.2.4
6-2.2.5
6-2.2.6
6-2.2.7
6-2.2.8
6-2.2.9
6-9
6-9
6-9
6-9
6-10
6-10
6-11
6-11
6-12
6-12
6-13
6-13
6-7
6~2.2.1O
6-2.2.11
6-2.2.12
6-2.2.13
6-2.3
6-2.3.1
6-2.3.2
6-2.3.3
6-2.3.4
6-2.3.5
6-2.3.6
6-2.4
6-2.4.1
6-2.4.2
6-2.4.3 .
6-2.4.4
6-2.4.5
6-2.4.6
6-2.4.7
6-14
6-14
6-15
6-15
.6-15
6-15
6-15
6-16'
6-17
6-18
6-18
6-18
6-18
6-18
6-19
6-19
6-19
.:.I
FEM Section II
6-1
6-3
TESTS
6-1.1 GENERAL
The variety of mechanica! handling equipment available nd the diversity of its application precludes the
specification of any single, universal acceptance test.
For this reason, it is 'essential, from the earliest pre-tender enquiries if possibIe, thal" the end user, his
engineer and the manufacturer/supplier of the equipment are all anticipating the same outcome.
Consequently, before a contract is awarded, the end user of the equipment should define and agree with the
supplier. the criteria that have to be met before the equipment can be handed over. .
The specification for these acceptanee tests should be as straightforward and as simple as possible, often
involving a "representative" test cycle to verify the performance of a single item of equipment in isolation
from the rest of the plant.
The conditions for these acceptanee tests should also be defined, for example. the following data should he
specified :
.
Weather conditions (wind, temperature, snow...),
- Whether the tests wiJl be carried out in the daytime or at night,
.
Characteristics of the materials to be handled (i.e. moisture, grain size, bulk density...),
Flow rates(mass flow, volume flow) to be achieved for, the various bulk materiaIs. and the
corresponding duration for each flow rate,
- Environmental conditions, in particuiar any restrictions affecting the movement of the tested appliances.
For instanee, information should be given on the type of ship on which a loaderor unloader will
operate, the type of stockpile '(cross section, length) on which a bucket-wheel reclaimer or a stacker will
operate, etc,
Methods for measuring handled quantities, actual operating times, etc,
Qualification of the operator(s),
a)
Demonstrate that a stockyard equipment is able to store or to reclaim the anticipated material quantities
in the required number of piles.
This requires to agree especially on the general arrangement of the piles and the travel distances of the'
mobile machines.
.
b) Demonstrate that the equipment can handle the working load(s) in normal operating conditions.
This requires an agreed definition of the ,!\,orking load(s) and how it will be measured
.. ./
FEM Section II
It should be noted that for bulk materials which density is variabie, it could be necessary to define for
example one tonnage capacity and one corresponding volumetrie capacity, the performance being
considered acceptable as soon as one of these capacities (tonnage or volume) isreached.
c)
Demonstrate that the equipment will improve the material blend by the required amount.
This requires an agreed sampling technique and method of analysis.
d)
Demonstrate that the plant can loadlunload a ship of a given size andtype in the required time.
"Whole plant" tests of this nature are difficult to achieve especially where pans of the plant are
supplied by different manufacturers. The management and organisation of the plant also has a
significant effect and this is often outside the supplier's contro!.
e)
Demonstrate that the equipment can handle a nominated surge load without excess of spillage.
This requires a definition of the surge load, both in magnitude and duration, also an agreement on what
is "acceptable" spillage.
f)
Demonstrate that the system can restart under load after an emergency (non sequence) stop at anormal
working throughput.
This requires an agreed definition of the corresponding working load and how it will be measured.
g) Demonstrate that the continuous output from the equipment does not fluctuate by more than an agreed .
toleranee.
The fluctuation toleranee should be quoted for a corresponding throughput and a method of assessment
agreed.
6-1.3 DEFINITIONS
.1 .Nominalor design rate: it
working conditions.
IS
.2 Peak instantaneous rate: it is the maximum practical throughput used for sizing equipment where
flow surges are expected. It is the maximum rate that the machine will meet in operation.
For reclaiming equipment this is normally defined by the manufacturer. In this case, the rate depends
on the flow characteristics of the equipment and the required maximum average rate.
For equipment which receives material from other up stream plant (e.g. a stacker), the peak
instantaneous rateis normally given by the customer.
.. ./
FEM Section II
.3
6-5
Maximum average rte I I hour average rate: it is the maximum operational throughput for.
short-term*, uninterrupted operation (Excludes such as stockpile ends, machine re-positioning, hatch
changes on ship loaders, etc).
. -.
.4. Daily average rate / Shift average rate / Through-ship rate: "whole plant" rate, greatly affected by
plant management practices, availability and location of materiaIs, up and downstream restrictions,
stockpile layout, hold size and efficiency of clean-up aids for ship unloaders, operator skilIs, etc.
It is sometimes required for plant acceptance tests but difficulties can be encountered where the supplier
does not have full control of the plant and incoming and outgoing materiais.
The relationship between I, 2 and 3 above is largely dependent on equipment type and it's method of
operation (especially for reclaiming equipment), characteristics of material or materiaIs, method of storage,
weather conditions (I6w temperature, forinstance), q~alification of drivers and operators, etc, and must be
established from experienee.
Note : Inthe case of multi-material machines, it is necessary to agree on the performance (bath mass and
volumetrie capacities) for each material, especially excluding, if necessary, the possibility of using the
.machine to handle the maximum volumetrie capacity of material of the heavier bulk density.
In this case, it is obviously necessary to install efficient "throughput limiting devices" either on the
machine itself (reclaiming machine) or on an other p~ of the plant, upstream of the machine.
.../
6-6
FEM Section II
The no-Ioad functional test should include- all modes of operation : manual and automatic operation
where appropriate and both nonnal and emergency stops under all operaling conditions.
.. .1
FEM Section II
6-7
At an early stage in the contract, the end user and supplier of the equipment should agree an
operational test schedule, the details of what schedule should contain and in what form any test
results should be presented.
Note : Records of ambi;ent temperatures, wind speeds, etc, during test may be required so that for instance
maximum power requirements, maximum forces, etc, can be got by back-calculation.
Dust,
Noise,
Stockpile capacity and size, live and dead storage areas,
Safety devices : force, torque, pressure limiting devices, ... ,
Carry-over and spillage,
Level probes, limit switches, sequencing and con trol systems,
Operation of chutes and diverter flaps, etc,
Start under nominal load,
Emergency and sequence stops,
Achi.evement of nominalor design rating.
.../
6-8
6-2
FEM Section n
6-2.1 GENERAL
The use of these design mies pre-supposes that the tolerances specified hereafter for travelling devices and
tracks shall be maintained.
. .
.
. These tolerances apply unless other conditions have been agreed with the user and take no account of elastic
deformation during operation.
Section 6-2.2 defines the manufacturing tolerances for travelling devices of machines.
Onder all circumstances, sufficient lateral play between rail and guiding devices must be provided to
accomodate the maximum allowable variationin machine span and track gauge.
It is then essential to ensure that tolerances for travelling devices and tolerances for track are compatible.
Where the design ora machine is such that the folJowing tolerance categories for tracks do not obviously
apply, the supplier of the machine must c1early indicate the initial tolerances to be followed for the tracks
.
and the maximum deviation aIJowed before resetting of tracks is required.
repeata~i1ity
When measuring tapes are used, calibrated steel tapes are recommended. The readings obtained
should be corrected for the sag in the tape as weil as for the difference between the ambient and
reference temperatures. All related measurements should be taken with the same tape and tension
force.
.../
FEM Section TI
6-9
+ 15 mm)
(s is to be expressed in m)
f
~.
~~ .
s' + /15
....
j..:-.--------=:.-.:--==------~---1
I:!
Figure 6-2.2.1
.1
%C:.-r
+ 0,2 %
0,05
~--J-tA
f
Figure 6-2.2.3
.. ./
6-10
FEM Section IJ
3 mm
s 3mm
.\....
r'1
Figure 6-2.2.4
I
horiiontal
.JIJ
'I
~_
horizontal;
11,,--'_ _,
-.l...j-
0,15 7. of S
L maxi == 10 mm
Figure 6-2.2.5
.. ./
FEM Section TI
6-11
3rnm for
< 0,1 % of s
for s > 3m
Figure 6-2.2.6
-j~
maxi
Figirre 6-2.2.7
.. ./
6-12
FEM Section II
2 m
=====-====~----
'::::;:-1
----
Figure 6-2.2.8
{/
'--=-=
7
I
-.J l
O~04 X maxi
Figure 6-2.2.9
.. ./
FEM Section
6-13
~~axi0 152
r
-L
7. of
I'
l~'
-"i .--'
---!
t
+~'-----.~s--,-------:-~~iI
J
horizontal
-
rnm
_horizonta_
Figure 6-2.2.10
1 mm
lnunl
~~-_--: ~
~-'-., _ax~r
Teoretic!-_l_ra_J._
Figure 6-2.2.11
For bushed wheels, tbe above tolerances apply' with tbe wheeI in a centra! position between tbe
contact surfaces at either side of the wheel.
.. ./
6-14
FEM Section II
1 mm maxi
11
___
11
I_i
I
/,',
-~-+
/I
1'\ ut
Figure 6-2.2.12
.../
FEM Section 11
6-15
= 3 mm
for s > 15 m: ds
(s is expressed in metres)
If the machine is guided on one rail only, or if the machine has a plvoted support or is of high
elasticity, the tolerance ds may be increased to three times the above value but must not exceed
25 mmo
.. ./
. 6-16
FEM Section IJ
~I
--.
-.-----
h /
...:.--
-------- -.-
til
Q)
"0
IN:
+1
r-..
.-
0
N
-IJ
0
.-<
'-'
J~
'~=t
0.1 % distance between wheel or bogie centres
.. ./
. FEM Section TI
6-17
,--
maxi 2mm _
L--
--=:J~
---=--..:.::...f=---,--
--
random sampling
Rail inclination
The lateral inclination of the rail rolling surface must not deviate from the theoreticai value by more
than 0.6 %.
,I
--'--_ -'L..
---r-
0,6 7-
.. ./
6-18
FEM Section II
IS
Rail joints
It is recommended that welded rail joints are used.
Misalignment at the rail joints is, therefore, not expected and need not be taken into account.
../
FEM Section IJ
6-19
Rail inclination
The average longitudinal inclination of the rail rolling surfaces must not deviate from the theoretical
value by more than 0.1 % of wheel or bogie centres (with a maximum of 0.3 % before realignment).
Rail inclination
lt is assumed that the track is mounted on resilient pads and that lateral deviation in the level of the
rail rolling surface will correct itself under load.