GBICxS Course Syllabus PDF

TRAINING COURSE
&
EXAMINATION
FOR
Commissioning Specialist
(NRNC, NREB, INC, IEB, ID Tools)
Course Syllabus
And
Examination Structure
Prepared by:
Ir. Soong Peng Soon
Date : 23rd June, 2016
Reviewed by:
Ir. Chen Thiam Leong
Date : 25th June, 2016
GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
All conventional rating tools for green building certification inevitably started out as design based
rating tools, that is to say, specification & guideline are given to designers to enhance design criteria to
attain a better building. They often address little or do not dictate the mechanism on performance
verification. In fact, it is a tough decision to dictate all criteria for performance verification of a building
since as technology progresses, building systems become more and more complex and performance of
one system often depends or are intertwined with other systems. For a green building professional, the
amount of time to study the operational data of a building upon completion and then to evaluate its
performance is a colossal task, let alone if rectification is required to improve the building performance.
Very often some rectification are impossible at the end of construction and commencement of
occupancy. Although a vast majority of green rated buildings are performing well courtesy of superior
design or cutting edge technology, there exist poor performing green buildings that baffle building
owners and occupants. Shortcomings that include poor energy performance or unfriendly indoor
environment are common for such failed buildings. The dissatisfied user experience is then translated
into accusations such as green building anxiety, green buildings waste energy efficiently, etc.
Occurrence of such shortcomings have embarrassed green building professionals but quite often the root
cause of the problems may not be due to the design, but rather caused by a mismatch of design intent
against actual operation, user profile and system set points. Unfortunately, the design & construction
team cannot account for factors beyond their control after the completion of construction, as the team
would have been demobilized by then.
It is therefore, always desirable to have a performance based rating tool that can guide the project
team to design & construct a building and which incorporates systems that are capable of producing
their own performance data to allow its users to fine tune the systems to match system performance.
Building professionals agree that provisions need to be made at the beginning of a project and in a
quality based and systematic manner. ASHRAE has drawn up a guideline in 2005 which redefined
commissioning activities to address imminent construction problems right from the start, and due to
its nature, it was given a special name of Guideline-0. The content of the guideline resonated with
green professionals and since then the USGBC LEED rating system as well as our GBI rating system have
included commissioning as part of their criteria. The latest version of LEED places more emphasis on
commissioning and has lifted the bar by expanding the involvement of commissioning professionals.
By definition in the ASHRAE guideline, a commissioning professional actually does not alter the
conventional construction discipline, as it merely defines the owners aspiration for performance in the
form of the Owners Project Requirement (OPR) and represents that the owner needs to fill in the gaps
between the various professionals of his project team in order to facilitate the final achievement to meet
the goals of the OPR. The activities are as illustrated below:

The green building professional, i.e. GBIF for GBI (or AP for LEED) is often (unfairly) expected to carry out
the function of commissioning regardless of the type and size of buildings. In reality, due to the
complexity of modern buildings, commissioning demands knowledge across many specific fields which
is difficult, if not impossible, for the GBIF to cover. Hence, such tasks need to be properly performed by
the Commissioning Specialist (CxS), who (together with his team) possess most of the specialized
knowledge and skill to guide the project team towards achieving the OPR through Communication,
Documentation & Verification activities. For rating tools that do not specify (and not award credits)
engagement of a CxS, the GBIF is expected to cover any scope of work of such nature.

COMMISSIONING STANDARDS & PRACTICE
Content - Synopsis
The module on Commissioning Standards & Practice is a 45min to 1-hour lecture using Powerpoint
presentation and aims to provide participants with basic introduction to global commissioning practice,
organizations or professional bodies that support the practices and highlights the relationship to green
building certification.
The module will cover the importance of commissioning to realize the objectives as documented in
Owners Project Requirement (OPR) relating to green initiatives, by means of appropriate
communication, documentation and verification.
The module will enable participants to relate historical development of commissioning concepts and the
world trend for future development and especially the contribution of commissioning to the GBI
certification process.
Objectives
1)
Offer an overall view on the global development of commissioning practice
2)
Explain distinction between TAB (testing, balancing & adjusting) and Cx (Commissioning)
3)
Elaborate standards & practices established by organizations such as ASHRAE, NEBB, SMACNA,
BSRIA, etc. and adoption of commissioning process by various green building certification
organizations.
4)
Understand certification process of commissioning professionals.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this module, participants should be able to:
1)
Appreciate and recognize the evolution of commissioning practice.
2)
Differentiate between TAB and Cx and understand the correlation between them, be
knowledgeable about the overall pre-functional & functional test of TAB and quality base sampling
tests expected from the CxS
3)
Understand the recognition of commissioning in sustainability designs.
Reference Documents
1)
ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process 72
2)
ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems 72
3)
Guideline 1.1-2007 -- HVAC&R Technical Requirements for The Commissioning Process 69
4)
PECI Model Commissioning Plans & Guide Specifications Downloaded
5)
Functional Testing and Design Guides from www.ftguide.org Link saved in PC
6)
GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides
7)
LEED Reference Guide on commissioning

Recommended Further Reading
Principles of Building Commissioning, Walter T. Grondzik - John Wiley & Sons ISBN 978-0-470-11297-7
Downloaded

ROLE & RESPONSIBILITY OF CxS
Content - Synopsis
The module on Role & Responsibility of CxS is a 45min to 1-hour lecture using Powerpoint presentation
and aims to enable participants to understand the role and responsibility of commissioning professionals
in the building industry. The emphasis on commissioning & verification (vs validation) of design &
construction within the conventional discipline will be highlighted. Participants will be taught to
appreciate the demarcation of work among various professionals and the obligation of contractors in
supporting green building certification.
The module will cover the value added aspects of CxS to the Owner in achieving their aspiration; assist
design consultants to create better buildings; facilitate contractors in construction sequencing & handing
over; and assist the GBIF in speedy and accurate achievement of the green building certification.
The module will enable participants to understand the expected contribution of the CxS to the GBI
certification process. It will also highlight the safety and precautions when implementing CxS scope.
Objectives
1)
Understand value added role of CxS to the building project. The importance of timely
engagement of CxS and related challenges and constraints.
2)
Explain distinction between role of GBIF and CxS. Demarcation of works when either one or
both are to be engaged in a green building project.
3)
Understand inputs by CxS to design consultants, guidance to contractors, owners operation and
maintenance staff towards green building certification. Attendance of CxS in all related meetings
and discussion sessions.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Clearly define the role of CxS (including CxS team) within the working matrix of a green building
project.
2)
Understand all GBI criteria that are directly related to CxS as well as other related criteria that need
contribution from CxS.
3)
Learn to contribute in a timely, meaningful and harmonious manner to the green building project
team, and able to identify & work with Subject Matter Experts (SME) for specialized fields.
References
1)
ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process
2)
ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems
3)
Guideline 1.1-2007 -- HVAC&R Technical Requirements for The Commissioning Process
4)
PECI Model Commissioning Plans & Guide Specifications
5)
Functional Testing and Design Guides from www.ftguide.org

6)
7)
LEED Reference Guide on commissioning


CxS DELIVERABLES FOR DA & CVA
Content Synopsis
The module on CxS deliverables for DA & CVA is a 2 to 2-hour lecture using Powerpoint presentation
and aims to enable participants to understand the deliverables expected from a commissioning
professional in the green building certification process. The main scope of the GBI CxS is described under
criteria EE6 & EE7 of:
a) NRNC & INC Tools (EE6) as Enhanced Commissioning and NREB & IEB Tools as Re-commissioning
or Retro-commissioning.
b) NRNC & INC Tools (EE7) as Post Occupancy Commissioning and NREB & IEB Tools as On-Going
Post Occupancy Commissioning.
Although there is no mention of commissioning in the ID Tool, the process will be similar to that of the
above mentioned Tools. The deliverables & milestones mentioned in EE6 & EE7 are common such as
Commissioning Plan, Commissioning Reviews, Commissioning Meeting, Performance Verification, Training
Verification, User Manual and Commissioning Report. Examples of such deliverables are similar to the
samples described in appendices of ASHRAE Guideline-0.
This module will describe in detail and provide examples on the essential content of each deliverable and
the implementation process to produce it. For example, after illustrating the content of Design Review
Report, the lecturer will comment on the essential steps and materials requested for preparation of
review, the communication means to disseminate the condensed information to the project team and
documentation of Issue Log and resolution.
The module will enable participants to adopt the right attitude & approach to harmoniously produce each
of these deliverables which will benefit other project team members.
Objectives
1)
Train CxS to produce deliverables that demonstrate the complete scope of works that CxS
needs to carry out.
2)
Timing of deliverables to be released to construction team and communication channel to bring

added value to the construction team members. Note that Commissioning Plan is recommended
to be submitted at DA stage together with recommended format for the deliverables.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Clearly understand the deliverables of CxS at each stage of construction and be able to take steps to
acquire information for their preparation, and initial communication channel to disseminate them.
2)
Understand the standard content & format of each deliverable as a communication tool to the GBIF
and other members of the construction team as must have valuable information.
3)
Appreciate the content of deliverables related to other GBI criteria as listed overleaf.
References
1)
ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process

2)
ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems
3)

Attachment for illustration
The basic deliverables in the form of Commissioning Plan, Commissioning Review, Submittal Review,
Commissioning Report, Training Verification, etc. will not be standalone documents that only address
description under GBI criteria EE6 & EE7. If so, then such will only be a shell document that cannot
provide an insight of the systems commissioned for the green building. Illustration of the systems
commissioned is best accompanied by meaningful sketches and raw data extracted from monitoring.
Each of the basic deliverable cannot describe only energy related parameters. It needs to take into
account and encompass indoor environmental quality, water consumption or other relevant performance
parameters. Table A depicts the basic related criteria that may be expected by the Owners from the CxS.
GBI NRNC Tool is used as the benchmark reference for the matrix below with miscellaneous criteria from
other Tools.
TABLE A: Criteria related to scope of CxS

Innovation criteria may include the need for commissioning of specialist supplied equipment or
accessories. The CxS has to verify whether these innovation initiatives can perform to Owners
Requirements.
By contributing input ideas to criteria that are signed-off by the PSP or SP, the CxS will help to
complement these professionals with their expertise in commissioning & actual operation background as
CxS.

With the systems to be commissioned defined, the CxS has to guide the construction team by drafting the
tentative commissioning schedule as illustrated below:
The following paragraphs will further illustrate each of the CxS related criteria and the expectation of
input from the CxS as value added advice to the construction team.
It is to be noted that drafting of Commissioning Plan & Schedule and all inputs to CxS related criteria for
construction team members shall be undertaken by the GBIF if no CxS is engaged for the project.
Signatory S denotes either GBIF or CxS.
Presence of CxS will enhance implementation of green initiatives by the GBIF.
It is also to be noted that GBI awards credit score to work carried out by registered CxS only. Also, if
both GBIF & CxS scope of works are undertaken by a single service provider company, the professional
assuming the roles of GBIF & CxS cannot be the same person. This is to ensure the independence of CxS
inputs.
In any case if neither GBIF nor CxS is engaged in a project, then all the above functions will have to be
carried out by the Owners Representative.

EE1
MINIMUM EE PERFORMANCE
Content - Synopsis
This module on EE1 illustration is a 20 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the importance of specifying adequate and effective I/O (Input/Output) points
during the design and bidding of BMS/EMS package. Proper provision of I/O points will contribute to
feasible evaluation of energy related credits for criteria EE5 & EE8, EQ, WE & IN.
The module will illustrate common points that must be included in the I/O list for effective verification
exercise upon completion by EMS. Some of these points must be trend logged for data acquisition.
Differentiate physical points from virtual points and provision of hardware & software. Appearance
of such points and their subsequent computed results are to be displayed on the EMS console screen.
The module will enable participants to demand from the system designer (SP) to provide the adequate
I/O points and describe the probable screen shots of EMS for subsequent monitoring and verification.
Objectives
Provision of Energy Management System (EMS) where Air-conditioned space 4000m 2. EMS system
must function properly to save energy.
Submission
Description of as-installed Energy Management System and I/O schedule
Learning Outcomes
1)
Define the necessary I/O points for effective monitoring and verification.
2)
Appreciate impact of I/O provision to overall installation cost and be able to suggest innovative
alternative means of monitoring or data acquisition for more economical solution with manual
intervention.
3)
Contribute to screenshot design of EMS console.
References
1)
ASHRAE Guideline 13-2015 Specifying Building Automation System
2)
ASHRAE Guideline 11-2009 Field Testing of HVAC Controls Components
3)
ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings
4)
PECI O&M Best Practices Series Energy Management Systems, A Practical Guide
5)
GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides; LEED Reference Guide on commissioning

Mechanical & Electrical Equipment for Buildings, Walter T. Grondzik, Alison Kwok, Benjamin Stein and John
Reynolds - John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-19565-9
downloaded

EE2 LIGHTING ZONING
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand that commissioning of energy efficient lighting controls should be centric to
end user experience. The system should be user-friendly to operate and minimize nuisance which can
result in fear to use, or else the system will not be functional to save energy.
The module will illustrate commonly overlooked issues such as time scheduling, overtime requirements,
auto-sensor range & type and delay timer setting. Selected lighting control systems will be displayed on
screen of LMS (lighting management system) console.
The module will enable participants to coordinate the input from Owners future operation staff and the
intent of the system designer (SP) to provide excellent user experience upon commissioning of control
system.
Objectives
Provide flexible lighting controls to optimize energy savings. Lighting has to be properly zoned.
Daylight auto-sensors or motion sensors are to be installed for appropriate areas and be practical.
Submission
Drawings of floor plans clearly showing each individually switched lighting zone and its coverage
area. Electrical schematic drawings showing the locations and extent of switching, the area
controlled by the switch and automated control sensing system details.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Review appropriate type of auto-sensor and setting during commissioning.
2)
Appreciate the increasingly popular & sophisticated addressable lighting control system.
3)
Evaluate the energy efficiency of lighting control system.
References
1)
Aalto University Lighting Unit Guidebook on Energy Efficient Electric Lighting for Buildings downloaded
2)
NREL Energy Use Intensity and its influence on the Integrated Daylighting Design of a Large Net
Zero Energy Building. Conference Paper, March 2011 downloaded
3)
ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings 135
4)
5)


EE3
ELECTRICAL SUB-METERING & TENANT SUB-METERING
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the common configuration of electrical power distribution for buildings. The
strategic location of power meters and the appropriate type will determine the effectiveness and
accountability of EMS in gathering energy data from these meters. The objective of this GBI criteria needs
to be understood to avoid both under and over provision of meters
The module will illustrate commonly overlooked issues such as lack of unified nomenclature system for
multiple meters among electrical, mechanical & BMS sub-contractors, mismatched CT or PT ratio, etc.
The lack of coordination often leads to delay in compiling a relational load table linking all meters which
will then not capture meaningful data and delay the analysis of power consumption data trend logged by
EMS.
The module will enable participants to coordinate the input from Owners future operation staff and the
single line electrical diagram from system designer (SP) to provide accurate information and
accountability on metering system during commissioning. Energy meters shall include BTU meters for
chilled water system.
Objectives
Monitor energy consumption of key building services as well as tenancy areas to obtain the
electrical load profile. Prepare improvement or diagnose trouble in case of abnormal electrical
consumption.
Submission
Specification detailing the installation and electrical schematic drawings showing the exact locations
of meters and the building usage served by these meters.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Review electrical single line diagram and comment on quantum and appropriate location of meters.
2)
Appreciate the different type of electrical power meters and their respective advantages or
drawbacks.
3)
Compile a relational load table linking all meters for the programmer of EMS and raw data analysis.
References
1)
ASHRAE Guideline 22-2012 Instrumentation for Monitoring Central Chilled Water Plant Efficiency
2)
3)


EE4
ADVANCED EE PERFORMANCE (RENEWABLE ENERGY)
Content - Synopsis
participants to re-visit the common configuration of renewable energy (RE) installation for buildings.
Generally, the most popular RE source is the solar photovoltaic (PV) panel installation. While design &
installation of such system is normally done by the specialist contractor, the CxS has to understand the
expected output/yield from such installations and its generation characteristics to be able to verify the
performance.
The module will illustrate common data that can be collected from the PV system either by real time
data collection and/or by spot reading on site using instrument such as pyranometer. The CxS has to
understand the common data link of PV system to external control console, either by WiFi, SIM card, SD
card or direct link to laptop. CxS shall advise the Owner during the bidding stage to realize the Owners
intended mode of data acquisition for performance verification. The path of PV output has to be known
to CxS, either to external Fit-in Tariff system, net metering or internal consumption through connection
to building MSB (Main Switch Board). The CxS may request installation of digital power meter at output
terminal to monitor performance of PV system if the high level interface between EMS & PV system
cannot be established.
The module will enable participants to coordinate the input from Owners PV specialist and the single line
electrical diagram from system designer (SP) to provide accurate information and accountability of RE
metering system during commissioning. CxS will normally witness the initial start-up of RE system and
verify the initial power generation by observing some spot readings.
Objectives
Encourage use of renewable energy.
Submission
Describe technology to be used, including documenting total kWp or predicted equivalent energy in
kWh. Predicted total electricity consumption by the building and percentage of renewable energy to
be generated. As-measured kWh or equivalent renewable energy generated.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Relate the electrical single line diagram to PV system and comment on appropriate meter locations.
Highlight the interface between EMS and PV, if any. Advise Owner to provide for data link of PV to
control console or any external data server.
2)
Appreciate the various ambient parameters that affect PV generation and interpret initial readings
provided by PV system contractor during initial start-up & commissioning of various technologies.
3)
Verify performance of PV system by short term batch readings or long term raw data analysis.
References
1)
NABCEP PV Installation Professional resource Guide.
2)


EE5
ADVANCED EE PERFORMANCE (EE SYSTEMS)
Content- Synopsis
participants to understand the computation of BEI and the effects of other parameters, system set-points,
sequence of operations, user profile, etc. The basis of benchmark building for BEI computation has to be
considered. The programming of EMS must be carefully done to accurately display the BEI to building
operators with breakdown of important consumption components for attention to mitigate any abnormal
usage or sequence of operation. The computation of BEI is done by gathering raw data from adequate
I/O (Input/Output) points specified during the design and bidding of BMS/EMS package. Cross reference
of points has to be made to EE1 to enable feasible evaluation of criteria EE5.
The module will illustrate common concern on matching of design intent with installation details,
commissioning procedures, operational set points (including EQ parameters) and user profile. The most
efficient M&E equipment could have been specified but the synchronization of set points & operational
sequence is crucial, while distribution system such as piping & ducting must be properly commissioned.
Dynamic energy simulation of building energy use could be very useful for designer but assumption taken
during pre-construction simulation must be calibrated with actual installation & operation for
verification.
The module will enable participants to appreciate BEI is a result of various factors and able to fill in the
gaps between various system designers (M&E, architectural, etc.) and system operators to realize the
intended efficiency & indoor comfort for optimized BEI.
Objectives
Exceed Energy Efficiency (EE) performance better than the baseline minimum to reduce energy
consumption in the building (by lowering Building Energy Intensity BEI). Improve passive and
active design elements to reduce energy consumption.
Submission
All documentation provided for criteria EE1 (cross referenced) and actual verified BEI achieved for
completed building. Actual EMS printouts or EMS raw data extraction with analysis.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Relate I/O points provided in EE1 for effective monitoring and verification.
2)
Appreciate impact of various factors on BEI and advise the construction team by filling the gaps
with inquisitive review on the interconnectivity & relationship among individual systems. Fine
tuning of energy system with operational staff taking into consideration of current facility
requirement and original design intent.
3)
Computation of BEI from EMS raw data and counter check screen displayed values of EMS console.
References
1)
MS 1525 : Code of Practice On Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy
2)

3)
4)


EE8
EE VERIFICATION / MONITORING & IMPROVEMENT
Content - Synopsis
participants to get down to the actual computation of BEI and water consumption from acquired raw data
of building operation. Consideration has to address the effects of other EQ parameters, system setpoints, sequence of operations, user profile, etc. with reference to the basis of benchmark building in the
original concept on BEI computation. In contrast to module EE5, which emphasizes the precautionary
measures and inquisitive review into building system integration to ensure good result (raw data), this
module will focus primary on the processing technique of extracted raw data. The programming of EMS
which displays the BEI & water consumption of building operators will be verified under this criteria.
Adequate I/O (Input/Output) points need to specified during the design and bidding of BMS/EMS package
in cross reference to EE1 to facilitate this exercise. EE verification plan is recommended to be submitted
at DA stage to recheck adequate provision.
The module will illustrate common concern of integrity check of acquired data, tallying utility bills with
computation and explanatory notes on any deviation from original assumption by designer, prevailing
standards or indication from BIM (building information modelling).
The module will enable participants to get down to the bolt & nuts of data analysis, verifying data
integrity with the least cost (avoid massive calibration), concluding building systems performance by facts
& figures and thus be able to formulate Maximum Demand Limiting strategies (auto or semi-auto). This
process is synonymous to the increasingly popular concept of Monitoring Based Commissioning (MBCx).
Objectives
Verify predicted energy use of key building services.
Submission
Actual verified BEI achieved, Renewable Energy generated and Water consumption for completed
building. Where EMS is installed, comprehensive printouts of EMS results and/or EMS raw data
extraction with analysis including description on Maximum Demand Limiting program setting.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize raw data format from common BMS/EMS system and advise Owner on the provision of
data extraction and back-up scheme.
2)
Perform data analysis by common software to verify the integrity and cross check computation of
BEI parameters from EMS and screen displayed values of EMS console. The exercise is to be done
accurately with minimum re-calibration of devices with adequate I/O point in EE1.
3)
Summarize the results of raw data analysis and relate them to operation status, occupancy rate,
user set-points & schedule, as well as other related parameters.
References
1)
2)
3)
IPMVP Core Concepts from EVO (Efficiency Valuation Organization): Concepts and Options for
Determining Energy and Water Savings & Indoor Environmental Quality Issues
ASHRAE Performance Measurement Protocols for Commercial Buildings: Best Practices Guide

4)

Mechanical & Electrical Equipment for Buildings, Walter T. Grondzik, - John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-47019565-9

EE9
SUSTAINABLE MAINTENANCE
Content - Synopsis
participants to get a brief insight into the operation & maintenance practices adopted by established
organizations such as the GSA (General Services Administration) of USA.
The module will illustrate the common concern of getting the right tools and right person for effective
maintenance of building system. The organization structure should be carefully thought to fill the
position with the right personnel. While training of such personnel should be months prior to
completion of building, periodic retraining exercise may be necessary due to employee attrition.
Sufficient space and appropriate tools should be provided for effective and speedy maintenance &
restoration of service.
The module will enable participants to understand how to advise the Owner to prepare for sustainable
maintenance and assist them in compilation of maintenance program during the bidding by specifying the
Owners expectation on operation & maintenance and getting specialist contractors to state the
maintenance requirements of respective system at early stage.
It is recommended that the CxS review shop drawings for maintainability of systems even though this
requirement is not stipulated clearly in the Reference Guide.
Objectives
Ensure the buildings energy related systems will continue to perform as intended beyond the (12
months) Defects & Liability Period.
Submission
Evidence of engagement of 50% of the maintenance team months before practical completion who
are then involved in the full testing & commissioning of the building energy related systems.
Comprehensive list of maintenance tools and instrumentation, and plan for at least 3-year facility
maintenance and preventive maintenance budget.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Advise the Owner on the importance of preparation for sustainable maintenance right from start of
the project.
2)
Assist the Owner in overseeing the provision of maintenance space, training of personnel by
specialist contractors and procurement of tools for the personnel.
3)
Summarize the completion of training by the construction team to operation & maintenance
personnel.
References
1)
GSA National Operation & Maintenance Specification. December 2012
2)
Space requirement for plant access, operation and maintenance London Defence Work functional
Standard Design & Maintenance Guide 08, endorsed by CIBSE.

3)


EQ1
MINIMUM IAQ PERFORMANCE
Content - Synopsis
This module on EQ1 illustration is a 20 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the importance of regulating and delivering the right quantity of fresh air to
respective space during commissioning and actual operation. The CxS needs to envisage the constraint of
designers concept and suggest enhancement or refinement of specification, so as to facilitate the
commissioning process and actual operation.
The module will illustrate the common concern that air balancing for extensive fresh air supply system is
more difficult to perform well in actual situation than design, especially with variable primary air volume.
Existence of high density special occupied space can disrupt overall set-point for minimum fresh airflow in
complying with the code.
The module will enables participants to understand the challenges and enlighten them to suggest
appropriate TAB procedure to contractor or enhancement (preferably low-cost) to designer for stable
regulation and delivery of fresh air to respective space.
Objectives
Establish minimum indoor air quality (IAQ) performance to enhance indoor air quality in building,
thus contributing to the comfort and well-being of the occupants.
Submission
Schematic drawings to illustrate the project ventilation system design. Summary report to describe
the ventilation design and how it complies with ASHRAE 62.1 and/or the local code including
information regarding the fresh air intake volumes and any special conditions that affect the project
ventilation design. Detailed calculations or simulations to show how the delivered minimum
outdoor airflow to each zone and outdoor airflow air intake for the system to meet the
requirements.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the challenges of fresh air delivery for large building.
2)
Appreciate the usefulness of air control accessories and proper air-balancing technique which will
enhance the stability of air delivery.
3)
Monitor the set point of fresh air delivery equipment after occupancy and diagnose imminent
shortcoming. Recommendation to adjust air controls accessories or equipment set point to
mitigate the shortcoming.
References
1)
JKKP : Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality
2)
ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 62.1 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
3)
4)


EQ3
CARBON DIOXIDE MONITORING AND CONTROL
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the actual challenges of commissioning CO2 monitoring system and associated
concerns from actual operation activities.
The module will illustrate the common coordination issues between ACMV & BMS contractors and the
minimum set point requirement for certain application.
The module will enable participants to understand the challenges and enlighten them to proactively
coordinate the various parties including the designer, contractors and supplier during Commissioning
Meetings to achieve stable and effective control of system while complying with codes.
Objectives
Provide response monitoring of carbon dioxide levels to ensure delivery of minimum outside air
requirements.
Submission
Ventilation and control schematics together with description of how CO2 monitoring and controls
are integrated into the ventilation design. Drawings showing the installed sensors and controls.
Summary report on the ventilation design and CO2 monitoring and control system including
information regarding the location, quantity of installed sensors, the operational parameters and
set-points. Manufacturers specifications of the CO2 sensors & photographic evidence of typical
installations.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the challenges of coordination for CO2 monitoring system.
2)
Appreciate the different type of control hardware & dampers to enhance the stability of air
delivery. Monitoring set point of fresh air supply equipment for optimization.
3)
Monitor the set point of fresh air delivery equipment after occupancy and diagnose imminent
shortcoming. Recommendation to adjust air controls accessories or equipment set point to
mitigate the shortcoming.
References
1)
SIEMENS - Demand Control Ventilation Application Guide for Consulting Engineers, Aug. 2013
2)
3)
4)
ASHRAE Guideline 13-2015 Specifying Building Automation System
5)
6)


EQ5
MOULD PREVENTION
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria. Although majority of activities
are not CxS related, however, the CxS has to recheck the commissioning and stability of maintaining
positive pressure relative to the exterior after reviewing the fresh air system under criteria EQ1 and/or
EQ3. For large ducted air system, the return air path needs to be reviewed by CxS as the construction can
be made up of architectural elements such as wall & ceiling whereby performance & leakage can be
beyond the control and knowledge of the designer. CxS will fill in the gaps by communicating with
relevant parties to clarify the configuration and suggest preventive measures from the commissioning and
operation point of view. Solutions may include measures such as sealing of AHU room, extended return
air duct or addition of return air fan, etc.
The module will illustrate the common physical issues for ACMV & BMS contractors in maintaining stable
pressure for selected configurations of the air system. Mitigation measures under various scenarios will
be discussed.
The module will enable participants to understand the challenges and enlighten them to proactively
coordinate the various parties, including the designer, contractors and supplier to achieve stable and
effective control of pressure system. In the process, the CxS will be able to identify the appropriate
locations (at least 2 points) for monitoring of temperature-humidity conditions.
Objectives
Design system(s) which reduce the risk of mould growth and its associated detrimental impact on
occupant health.
Submission
Drawings & specifications confirming that the building has been constructed in accordance with the
design to demonstrate that the air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation system will maintain a
positive indoor air pressure relative to the exterior, and can actively control indoor air humidity to
be no more than 70% RH. Provide 24-hour record (during full occupancy) of Temperature-Relative
Humidity measurements for at least two (2) areas.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the challenges of maintaining interior positive pressure for certain air system.
2)
Appreciate the constraints and resolve the issues early through Commissioning Meetings with
designer & contractors to arrive at low cost or no-cost solution.
3)
Specify to the contractor the type of mobile data logger or permanently fixed sensors to take
representative readings on Temperature-Relative Humidity. Air pressure data logger is optional.
References
1)
Trane Newsletter Vol 32 No.2 - Commercial Building Pressurization
2)

3)
4)


EQ6
THERMAL COMFORT: DESIGN & CONTROLLABILITY OF SYSTEMS
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria. The designer would have
designed the AC system to meet ASHRAE 55 standard the CxS needs to study the design objectives to
ensure proper commissioning such as balancing of air, water or refrigerant to specific space by dictating &
monitoring TAB procedures and other checklists of functional performance test to contractors. CxS is to
assist the designer to review location of thermostats for base building & renovated areas to provide the
best control strategy. CxS is to also work with Owners personnel to fine tune set points of temperature,
airflow and cooling medium to meet the current facility requirements & operation and maintenance plan.
The module will illustrate how the CxS can use his expertise to optimize the design objectives & address
constraint to ensure the Owner gets the best result by guiding the ACMV & BMS contractors in
construction, testing & commissioning; and document the final set-points with operational personnel.
The module will enable participants to understand the expectation of construction team and enlighten
them to proactively coordinate the various parties, including the designer, contractors and supplier for
the best system performance as far as possible. In the process, the CxS will be able to identify the
appropriate locations (at least 2 points) for monitoring of temperature-humidity conditions and
verification of designers effort and contributing effect of the CxS.
Objectives
Provide a high level of thermal comfort system control by individual occupants or by specific groups
in multi-occupant spaces to promote the productivity, comfort and well-being of building occupants.
Submission
Strategies to fulfill the requirements specified in ASHRAE 55 in conjunction with the relevant localized
parameters as listed in MS 1525. Describe provision of individual control for at least 50% of building
occupants and also provision of controls for shared multi-occupant spaces. Provide 72-hour record
(during full occupancy) of temperature measurement for at least two (2) areas to verify thermal comfort.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the expectation of construction team and complement them with Cx expertise.
2)
Appreciate the design objectives & constraints to resolve the issues early through Commissioning
Meetings with designer & contractors to arrive at low cost or no-cost solution.
3)
representative readings on space temperature. Humidity, radiant temperature and air movement
readings are optional but will enhanced verification & trouble shooting.
References
1)
2)
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 Thermal environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
3)

4)


EQ7
AIR-CHANGE EFFECTIVENESS
Content - Synopsis
This module on EQ7 illustration is a brief 5 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria which is rarely achieved in most
building projects. Generally, it is only applicable to underfloor air distribution system or thermal
displacement ventilation system. The CxS will need to study the design objectives to ensure proper
commissioning such as balancing of air, sequencing of equipment operation, etc. by dictating &
monitoring TAB procedures and other checklists of functional performance test to contractors. CxS may
be required to oversee the testing for compliance to ASHRAE 129 standard by contractor if such test is
stipulated in the construction contract. The concerted effort for successful performance normally
requires to cross many parties in the construction team, for example, raise floor specification is the
prerogative of architect, appearance of floor diffusers to ID designer acceptance while air distribution
system is designed by M&E engineer. CxS needs to fill in the gaps by helping to integrate the various
concept to attain the desired result.
The module will illustrate what the CxS usually should look out for in the contractors submittal and
details of testing procedure (if required) and interpretation of result.
The module will enable participants to understand the achievement path and benefits of this criteria.
Objectives
To ensure clean air is delivered effectively through reduced mixing of indoor pollutants to achieve a
good indoor environment. Provide effective delivery of clean air through reduced mixing with
indoor pollutants in order to promote a healthy indoor environment. Demonstrate that the Air
Change Effectiveness (ACE) meets the following criteria for at least 90% of the NLA.
Submission
Design criteria & drawings that has been adopted for each type of space in the development, detailing
how ventilation system is designed to meet the criteria compliance. Record of measurement to
demonstrate compliance.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Understand the rationale behind the design intent of this criteria and coordinate with various
parties of the construction team to attain the desired effect.
2)
representative readings on space temperature. Humidity, radiant temperature and air movement
readings are optional but will enhance verification & trouble shooting.
References
1)
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 129 Measuring Air-change Effectiveness
2)
3)


EQ8
DAYLIGHTING
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria. The design of daylighting
system is beyond the reach of CxS and other professional would have designed the system to meet
Owners requirements. Probable daylighting software simulation would have been performed and a copy
of the result to be given to the CxS. The CxS will only suggest methodology to verify Daylight Factor result
by site measurement in his Commissioning Plan. The interpretation of simulation result will enable the
CxS to relate any provision of daylight sensor and its setting under EE2. Thus, the CxS essentially will fill
in the gaps by coordinating the location of daylight sensors (purview of engineer) and performance of
daylight system (purview of architect).
The module will illustrate how the CxS needs to request information from other consultants or specialist
contractors dynamically to devise daylight verification methodology. Preliminary test may be performed
for indicative result if sectional mock-up is done on site.
The module will enable participants to understand the important of reading result on daylight system
design & simulation and subsequently propose verification methodology.
Objectives
Provide good levels of daylighting for building occupants.
Submission
Site plan incorporating height of existing buildings or planned buildings surrounding the building together
with drawings and specifications demonstrating daylighting system constructed. Typical floor plans with
Daylight Factor measurement results, solar diagrams, sun path and summary of Daylight Factor profile.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Request relevant information from other consultants on daylight system design.
2)
Interpret the result and suggest to the designer and contractor on daylight auto switching circuits.
3)
Specify to the contractor the appropriate verification methodology and type of mobile data logger
or centrally fixed multiple sensors to take representative readings to map daylight profile at specific
time and instruct contractor to plot the result over plan layout of daylight system for verification
purpose.
References
1)
Ball State Architecture DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS presentation slides, Walter T. Grondzik
2)

Reynolds - John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-19565-

EQ9
DAYLIGHT GLARE CONTROL
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria. The design of daylighting glare
control system is beyond the reach of CxS and other professional would have designed the system to
meet Owners requirements. Only upon request, the CxS will suggest methodology to verify reduced
discomfort of glare from natural light is assured when glare control system is engaged at specific time.
The test methodology is simple measurement of illumination levels at time with & without engagement of
such glare control devices. Instrument use is normally common illumination meter put near to faade.
As a caution, the CxS has to examine the drawing & site installation for other factors that affect the
occupancy comfort at areas near faade such as radiant heat transmission from faade thermal bridging,
adequate cooling air delivery, etc. Such factors can result in illusion by occupants near these areas to
conclude the discomfort is due to glare alone as other factors can be invisible to them. In such cases,
CxS may suggest additional testing at specific time with other more sophisticated instrument to obtain
result that will identify any illusionary factor.
Besides that, the CxS should coordinate the location of any daylight sensors (purview of engineer) and
operation of glare control system (purview of ID/architect).
The module will illustrate how the CxS need to request information from other consultants or specialist
contractors to devise daylight verification methodology. Preliminary test may be performed for indicative
result if sectional mock-up is done on site.
The module will enable participants to understand the important of reading submittal on glare control
devices and construction details on facade. In particular, if blinds are to be used as shading device, such
shall to of horizontal type to suit our equatorial climate application.
Objectives
Reduce discomfort of glare from natural light. Where blinds or screens are fitted on all glazing and
atrium as a base building, incorporate provisions to meet the GBI criteria.
Submission
Typical floor plans and sections showing position of glare control system. Description of control
mechanism installed. Manufacturers Information on the blind and control systems. Summary report to
describe how view and daylight is assured when glare control system is engaged.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Request relevant information from other consultants on glare control design.
2)
Understand the submittal and suggest to the designer and contractor of any daylight sensor
location with respect to the glare control devices.
3)
Specify to the contractor appropriate verification methodology and interpret the test results.
References
1)
Ball State Architecture DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS presentation slide, Walter T. Grondzik

2)

Reynolds - John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-19565-

EQ10 ELECTRIC LIGHTING LEVELS
Content - Synopsis
designed the lighting level of all space to meet MS1525 standard the CxS should study the basis of design
to ensure proper commissioning by dictating procedures on functional performance test to contractors.
CxS should request information from construction team such as lighting level simulation result, submittal
of luminaries, etc. to verify no missing step in prevention of over design. Simulation has to be performed
whenever new type of luminaries or interior finishes are selected. CxS has to confirm the situation that:
only portion of all installed lights to be turned on at one time; use of any task light by individual against
ambient light; etc. for devising appropriate testing methodology.
The module will illustrate what can be normal pitfalls that can result in this simple credit to be missed due
to oversight in proper luminary selection process and lack of communication among design professionals
of different fields. CxS should fill in the gaps with commissioning process.
The module will enable participants to understand the factors affecting indoor lighting levels and
enlighten them to proactively coordinate the various parties, including the designer, contractors and
supplier for the best system performance. The CxS should then suggest verification methodology to
contractor.
Objectives
Baseline building office lighting not to be over designed.
Submission
Drawings showing the lighting layout plans. Photometric measurements to illustrate that the lighting
level fulfills the credit requirement.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the factors that may possibly affect on-site measurement result against basis of design.
2)
Appreciate the basis of design and attempt to avoid over design issues early through
Commissioning Meetings with designer & contractor, or by preliminary assessment at mock-up.
3)
Specify to the contractor the type of mobile illumination meters to be used for verification & review
methodology and result of verification.
References
1)
2)
3)
Aalto University Lighting Unit Guidebook on Energy Efficient Electric Lighting for Buildings
4)


EQ13 INTERNAL NOISE LEVELS
Content - Synopsis
designed the noise level of all spaces to meet GBI criteria, and in some projects, an Acoustic Consultant
might have been engaged. The review of design by CxS is, therefore very minimal. The CxS should merely
study the basis of design to ensure proper verification by dictating procedures & instrument used on
functional performance test to contractors. CxS should request information from construction team such
as noise calculation result, submittal of attenuating material, equipment sizing, etc. as reference to
determine suitable locations for taking noise readings. Evaluation criteria from GBI will be referred in
devising the testing methodology.
The module will illustrate what can be normal shortcomings in past projects that has led to
disqualification of this credit. CxS need to know the measurement criteria in the evaluation process, for
which the benchmark is only the noise generated by building services.
The module will enable participants to understand the normal data taking process with sound level meter
and presentation of result to project team. It is recommended that CxS should have access to sound level
meter that can take noise reading for various octave bands in preparation for presentation.
Objectives
Maintain internal noise levels at an appropriate level. Demonstrate that 90% of the NLA do not
exceed the following ambient internal noise levels: < 45dBAeq for open plan and < 40dBAeq for
closed offices. Limits may vary for different types of space.
Submission
Report describing the measured internal and external noise sources, and features installed to achieve
required noise level.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the various terminologies used in the noise control community.
2)
Appreciate the basis of design & submittal and attempt to devise fair & practical methodology for
evaluation & verification. Preliminary assessment at mock-up may be required.
3)
Specify to the contractor the type of instrument to be used for verification & review contractors
submitted methodology. Perform analysis of result and presentation to project team.
References
1)
WorkSafeBC Basic Noise Calculation, April 2007
2)
Bruel & Kjaer Leq, SEL What? Why? When?
3)
BSRIA Guide GB41/2012 Understand Acoustic Performance Data
4)


EQ14 IAQ BEFORE & DURING OCCUPANCY
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand this main scope of works for CxS under this criteria which is new to many
consultants in conventional disciplines. The CxS has to lead the implementation of this criteria though the
designer would have designed the infra-structure such as exhaust systems and architect has specified the
low emission building materials. The expertise to lead the implementation is often cross discipline, and
range from understanding exhaust air system design, type of pollutant normally found in building
material, to methodology and instrumentation to evaluate them. Moreover, the actual air- flushing to be
carried out on-site may face challenges such as fire alarm bypass, noise generated, excessive pressure
gradient, moisture ingress from exterior moist air, etc., such that the CxS has to highlight the potential
risks to Owner or contractor for their options in implementation. If air sampling option is chosen to verify
IAQ by the Owner, the CxS can assist in identifying the appropriate third party service provider to carry
out the work. But CxS has to comment on the result from any external party and to advise to the Owner
based on GBI evaluation criteria. It is recommended that the CxS should have a basic set of IAQ verifying
instrument, to judge either the effectiveness of air-flushing or explore conditions of areas unable to be
covered by external third party service provider for air sampling.
The module will illustrate how air flushing process can be carried on-site and the precautionary measures
to ensure safety & effectiveness. Detailed calculation on sample projects will be presented. Illustration
on air sampling option & acceptance criteria according to the local code will be presented with
comparison to other world acceptable standards.
The module will enable participants to understand the essence of indoor air quality in GBI criteria intent
and various path to achieve the credit. The CxS need to propose the methodology for air flushing or air
sampling option to the project team.
Objectives
Reduce indoor air quality problems resulting from the construction process in order to help sustain
the comfort and well-being of building occupants. Develop and implement an Indoor Air Quality
(IAQ) Management Plan for the Pre-Occupancy phase.
Submission
Summary outlining the strategies and procedures to be taken to meet the credit requirements. Report on
building flush-out procedure including the actual dates of the flush-out. If IAQ testing (air sampling) is
carried out, a report to outline the procedures undertaken and the results of the test to compare with
criteria requirements and corrective measures, if any, must be taken.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Draft proposed methodology for air flushing or air sampling option.
2)
Specify to the contractor the type of air system to be used for air flushing or instrument for IAQ
verification. Perform analysis of result and presentation to project team.
References
1)

2)

Indoor Air Quality Handbook, McCarthy, John; Spengler, John; Samet, Jonathan McGraw Hill, ISBN 0071414843
/ 9780071414845

EQ15 POST OCCUPANCY COMFORT SURVEY: VERIFICATION
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand comfort survey is an extension of commissioning works to finally verify
whether all green features are properly commissioned, especially the ACMV and lighting system. Though
the GBIF is leading the planning of the comfort survey and the Owner is implementing the survey, the CxS
has to plan & lead the objective measurements of the relevant environmental variables at specific
locations as the CxS deem fit to represent the overall indoor environment after reviewing all TAB reports
submitted by the contractors. CxS has to acknowledge that the survey, through a systematic process for
occupants to provide feedback on their indoor environmental comfort from a significant and
representative sample of occupants population, some results are bound to be subjective due various
personal reasons and the survey should be accompanied with objective measurements of the relevant
environmental variables such as short term monitoring or spot measurements. These measurements
should be done by contractor under the supervision of CxS. Once problem areas have been identified
through the survey, corrective actions can then be undertaken with reference to the data acquired during
objective measurements. In instances with border line acceptance scenarios (close to 80%) of survey,
these data can be used by GBIF to substantiate with other facts to convincing the GBI Certifier that
comfort objectives have actually been achieved.
The module will illustrate what are the fair and reasonable approaches to get representative sample from
typical buildings as it is anticipated that not all occupants will respond to the survey. Proportion of
Transient occupants and full time occupants of the building has to be taken with respect to types of
building.
The module will enable participants to understand the essence of comfort survey and work with GBIF and
Owner to work out meaningful survey with useful result to verify achievement of objectives.
Objectives
Provide for the assessment of comfort of the building occupants.
Submission
Strategies undertaken to meet criteria compliance. Survey questionnaire used to collect responses from
the occupants. Objective measurement plan illustrating the areas and measurements undertaken.
Analysis report of the results of the survey and measurements. Corrective action plan and measures
undertaken to rectify the problem.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Assist GBIF in drafting survey plan to capture meaningful feedback from representative sample of
occupants population.
2)
Proposed objective measurements and lead the contractor to implement it and to compile the
result. To conclude implication of measurement result to survey result and presentation to Owner.
References
1)
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 Thermal environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy

2)
Recommended Further Reading:


SM1
GBI RATED DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION (FOR NREB OR IEB TOOLS ONLY)
Content - Synopsis
This module on SM1 illustration is a 30 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand how to make use of information from previous green building rating report or
energy efficiency audit report in preparing better Commissioning Plan for NREB or IEB certification. If a
new energy efficiency audit is to be carried out, the CxS has to specify the expected results of audit that
are relevant for preparation of the Commissioning Plan.
The module will illustrate what are the useful information from previous green building certification and
energy efficiency audit. Special focus is given on the appropriate approach for new energy efficiency
audit to be conducted.
The module will enable participants to understand the constraint of existing building certification as not
all building systems will be rebuilt from new. Accurate and realistic information has to be obtained as
much as possible from previous certification and audit for drafting of Commissioning Plan that will
realistically achieve the Owners aspiration. Without such information, CxS has to assume conditions of
existing installation by simplified survey.
Objectives
Recognition to building with previous green rating or with recent energy efficiency audit performed.
Submission
GBI recognized green rating certificate or Energy Efficiency Audit Report less than a year old.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize importance of prior knowledge of existing building is crucial for realistic commissioning
plan. Request for additional information as much as possible.
2)
Specify building audit exercise for Owner to conduct meaningful audit.
References
1)
ASHRAE Guide Procedures for Commercial Building Energy Audit
2)


SM5
NOISE POLLUTION (FOR INC TOOLS ONLY)
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the scope of works for CxS under this criteria. The industrial designer process
engineer would have designed features to prevent noise pollution to local codes & practices and likely an
Acoustic Consultant or Industrial Hygiene Assessor on noise might have been engaged. The review of
design by CxS is, therefore very minimal. The CxS should merely study the basis of design to ensure
proper verification by observing procedures & instrument used by factory personnel on environmental
monitoring. CxS should request information from factory personnel such as noise calculation result,
submittal of attenuating material, equipment sizing, etc. as reference and observe locations & duration
for taking noise readings. Evaluation criteria from GBI will be referred, in preparing the report of
observation in Commissioning Report. CxS may mobilize their own set of instrument for verification.
The module will illustrate prevailing codes & practices for work place noise controls & monitoring and
qualification/certification of competent personnel by authority.
The module will enable participants to understand the normal interpretation of industrial noise
monitoring result and relationship to GBI criteria.
Objectives
To reduce noise levels diffused from building plant.
Submission
Strategies to ensure external noise level is maintained at the prescribed levels. Floor plans showing
equipment location and noise control features. Report describing measure external noise sources and
features installed to achieve required noise level.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Understand the industrial noise monitoring practice, acceptable limits and common attenuation
methods & materials.
2)
Summarize noise measurement result provided by factory personnel and comment on achievement
with respect to GBI requirement or criteria.
References
1)
WorkSafeBC Basic Noise Calculation, April 2007
2)
BSRIA Guide GB41/2012 Understand Acoustic Performance Data
3)

Handbook of Noise Measurement, Arnold P.G. Peterson GenRad.

SM13 BUILDING USER MANUAL
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the importance of documentation on the green features and supporting design
brief to Operation & Maintenance (O&M) personnel for the continuous efficient operation and
sustainable maintenance. Concise & accurate information must be available to O&M personnel in hard
copy & electronic media so that it can be accessible anytime and from anywhere. More importantly, the
organization of documentation should made systematically for various level of O&M personnel and type
of job requiring the information. Building User Manual (BUM) is a condensed version of all full version of
Conventional O&M Manual submitted by contractor of the building. Conventional O&M Manual is
considered as supporting document that includes as-built drawings, catalogues, equipment operating
instruction, etc. which are normally bulky. BUM is a concise version of all supporting documents to
enable anyone who has first contact with green features to quickly know the intent and operation of such
features. For complex & very large systems, a User Guide is further condensed from BUM to enable faster
reading on critical information of green features. Such effort in preparing the BUM will benefit Occupants
and O&M personnel as well as future contractors to perform renovation in the building without
compromising the original design intent.
The module will illustrate the normal structure & content of BUM. As technology is becoming more
advanced, use of digital & visual media are highly desirable for clear & fast access to interested
information.
The module will enable participants to understand the type & form of information to be requested from
construction team and prepare the BUM according to the most widely acceptable sample format.
Objectives
Document Green building design features and strategies for user information and guide to sustain
performance during occupancy.
Submission
Building User Manual and furnish framework of contents.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Request information from construction team timely and organized it systematically for the
preparation of BUM.
2)
Prepare the BUM according to prescribe format.
3)
Assist the Owner in preparation of digital BUM if requested.
References
1)
BSRIA Guide BG 26/2011 Building Manual and Building User Guides (guidance & examples)
2)


MR7
REFRIGERANTS & CLEAN AGENTS
Content - Synopsis
This module on MR7 illustration is a 5 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the role & scope of work of CxS under this criteria. Generally the type of
refrigerants & clean agents to be used would have been adequately specified by designer with due
consideration and design review from CxS is normally not needed. However, CxS should obtain a full list
of refrigerants & clean agents and operation with specific equipment, to counter check whether the
application of such chemical will have any adverse effect on energy consumption or indoor air quality.
Most of the time, there should not be any issue arising, and the information are more for record purpose
for the CxS and it will be listed in BUM for reference in case of replacement. However, there can be some
exceptions such as use of hydrocarbon as refrigerant. As most AC equipment in the market were not
originally designed to work with the refrigerant and therefore, changing of refrigerant may have effect on
operation efficiency. In such cases, the CxS may need to observe the commissioning of these equipment
to verify the proportionate energy consumption under criteria EE5.
The module will illustrate the principle and intent of using green refrigerants & clean agents.
The module will enable participants to understand commonly used green refrigerants & clean agents and
the influence on building system performance, if any.
Objectives
To demonstrate leadership in accelerating phase-out of all Ozone Depleting Substances. Recognize
and promote use of low Global Warming Substances.
Submission
Proposed types of refrigerants and clean agents to be used and/or evidence if no refrigerants or clean
agents will be used. Submit list of as-installed refrigerants and clean agents.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Request information from construction team timely and organized it systematically for the
preparation of BUM.
2)
Evaluation any potential effect of applied refrigerant & clean agent to performance of building
systems.
References
1)
ASHRAE Standards Current Refrigeration-Related Standards and Guidelines
2)
NFPA 2001: Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems
3)


WE1
RAINWATER HARVESTING
Content Synopsis
This module on WE1 illustration is a 30 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the principle of rainwater harvesting with respect to local rainfall profile,
storage capacity and metering requirement for accountability of usage. A brief rainfall simulation
spreadsheet will be demonstrated.
The module will illustrate the common complaints from occupants on rainwater consumption such as
consistent water quality, city water back-up supply, prevention of tank siltation, first flush & particle
separator maintenance, maintenance of rain water pump, etc. Solution to these complaints will be
demonstrated with diagrams and pictures.
The module will enable participants to understand the design and provision of appropriate accessories
that will affect the commissioning of rainwater harvesting system and maintaining consistent water
quality to occupants. Illustration will enlighten participants on the challenges of commissioning and
operation of harvesting system and enable them to proactively coordinate the various parties, including
the designer, contractors and supplier during Commissioning Meeting for the stable, efficient and
effective harvesting system while complying with the local code.
Objectives
To encourage rainwater harvesting that will lead to reduction in potable water consumption.
Submission
Technical report schematics showing concept and details of rainwater collection, conveyance
system (gutters/downpipes or equivalent), filtration system (if any), storage facility and distribution
system. Final as-installed calculation (or direct measurement) of rainwater harvested, storage tank
capacity for specific building usage with respect to the overall building consumption.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the challenges of commissioning & maintaining rainwater harvesting system.
2)
Perform design review on system and submittal review to comment additional requirement from
the commissioning and maintenance point of view. Suggest accessories that can enhance the
stability of water quality and harvesting effectiveness. Verify adequate metering for accountability.
3)
Dictate set point for make-up water level and total tank level. Monitor harvested water usage and
review set point continuously.
References
1)
Australian National Water Commission Rainwater Tank Design & Installation Handbook
2)
Unite Nation Environmental Program - Handbook on Rainwater Harvesting in Caribbean
3)
American Society of Landscape Architects 2011 Annual Meeting & Expo conference paper: From
Catchment to Reuse
4)


WE2
WASTE WATER RECYCLING
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the commonly used options of waste water recycling. Presently, most
installations are based on recycling of greywater for irrigation purpose. In industrial building with reverse
osmosis plant producing ultra-pure RO water, the quantity of brine water as waste is of substantial
amount and can be recycled for secondary use. Though these sort of systems normally are designed &
installed by specialist contractor, commissioning process of these system is similar to other building
systems, CxS still have to know the system, review the OPR, BOD, relating them to other systems such as
BMS, review pre-function & functional checklists, etc.
The module will illustrate the common integration to other systems and features such as landscaping.
CxS should fill in the gap between this specialist designer with other system designers & contractors.
The module will enable participants to appreciate the various common options for recycled water and
enable them to proactively coordinate the various parties, including the designer, contractors and
supplier during Commissioning Meeting for successful construction of stable & safe water recycled system
while complying with the local code.
Objectives
To encourage water recycling that will lead to reduction in potable water consumption.
Submission
Calculation to demonstrate the percentage of wastewater to be treated and recycled. Technical
report & schematics describing the concept and details of the recycling and treatment plant,
conveyance system, storage facility and distribution system.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the common options for waste water recycling systems.
2)
Perform design review on the system and submittal review to comment on additional requirement
from the commissioning and maintenance point of view. Recheck with other building system
interface and appreciate end-user concerns. Verify adequate metering for accountability.
3)
Dictate set point for make-up water level and total tank level. Monitor recycled water usage and
review set point continuously.
References
1)
Australian National Water Commission Urban Greywater Design & Installation Handbook
2)
Irrigation of Amenity Horticulture with recycled water - Dr. Daryl P Stevens, Steven Smolenaars &
Jim Kelly
3)
Puretec: Basics of Reverse Osmosis
4)


WE3
WATER EFFICIENT - IRRIGATION/LANDSCAPING
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the commonly installed irrigation system for landscape. Though these sort of
systems normally are designed & installed by specialist contractor under the purview of Landscape
Architect, commissioning process of these system is similar to other building systems, CxS still have to
know the system, review the OPR, BOD, relating them to other systems such as BMS, review pre-function
& functional checklists, etc. Some advanced system need the provision of rain-sensor or moisture sensor
to conserve water as much as possible. Whether using potable water or alternative sources, adequate
metering is necessary for measuring irrigation water consumption which should be highlighted by CxS.
The module will illustrate the common irrigation systems and relevant features in landscaping,
ornamental pools, etc. CxS should fill in the gap between this specialist irrigation designer with other
building system designers & contractors.
The module will enable participants to appreciate common concern such as control & back-up potable
water, etc. and enable them to proactively coordinate the various parties, including the designer,
contractors and supplier during Commissioning Meetings for successful construction of stable & safe
water irrigation system while complying with the local code.
Objectives
Encourage the design of system that does not require the use of potable water supply from the local
water authority for irrigation.
Submission
Brief report by a landscape architect detailing the selection of vegetation and the water efficient
irrigation system and demonstrating that it will meet all the requirements for the credit. Plans
showing the detail location of vegetation and installed water efficient irrigation system (to scale).
Calculation of the reduction of potable water for landscape irrigation.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the commonly irrigation system, especially if piping & controls are present.
2)
3)
Coordinate with landscape architect on the set point of make-up water level and total tank level.
Monitor irrigation water usage and review set point continuously. Calculate water consumption.
References
1)
Australian NSW Government, Department of Primary Industries Aspect to consider when

choosing an Irrigation System for Horticulture
2)
Irrigation of Amenity Horticulture with recycled water - Dr. Daryl P Stevens, Steven Smolenaars &
Jim Kelly

3)


WE4
WATER EFFICIENT FITTINGS
Content - Synopsis
This module on WE4 illustration vis a 20 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to understand the certification scheme and recognize the commonly installed water efficient
fittings for buildings. Although selection of such fittings is the works of Architect or Consulting Engineers,
CxS still have to know the selection process and submittal, review the correlation to Owners aspiration in
OPR, BOD, relating them to other systems such as BMS, review pre-function & functional checklists, etc.
Whenever feasible, commissioning plan should include the verification by spot reading for water
consumption of these fittings and instruction to be given to contractors for preparation of testing method
& checklist. Normally these involve only simple instrument such as beaker & stopwatch. Whether using
potable water or alternative sources, adequate meter provision is necessary for measuring &
accountability of water consumption which should be highlighted by CxS. Preferably, a commissioning
plan detailing the final scheme of water use accountability should be made ready prior to bidding process.
The module will also illustrate the common mismatch expectation in water savings due to coordination &
set point such as selection, location and set points of pressure reducing assemblies that control the
upstream pressure of such fittings. As water flow rate primarily depends on such pressure, CxS should
understand the basis of selection and fill in the gap between the designer with other building system
suppliers & contractors to arrive at better configuration with minimal or no-cost solution at early stage of
design.
The module will enable participants to appreciate common concerns of reduction in water flow against
user experience. In some situation, pumping may be required to balance between water saving and
usability. This module will thus enable CxS to proactively coordinate the various parties, including the
designer, contractors and supplier during Commissioning Meetings for successful installation of water
efficient system that meet the Owners expectation & occupant comfort.
Objectives
Encourage reduction in potable water consumption through use of efficient devices.
Submission
Brief description of the system including makes of the intended fittings and an explanation of how the
system meets the requirement for the credit. Tabulation of all as-installed water efficient fittings and
calculations to verify percentage of water saved to meet the requirement for the credit.
Learning Outcomes
1)
2)
3)
Recognize the commonly rating system for water efficient fittings and understand the basis of
testing for each type of system.
Coordinate with designer on the set point of any pressure reducing devices against the intended
upstream range of pressure for these fittings. Monitor water usage, listen to user feedback and
review set point continuously. Calculate water consumption.
References
1)
Australian Government website: Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (WELS) scheme
http://www.waterrating.gov.au/

2)
3)
Singapore Government website: Water Efficiency Labelling Scheme (WELS)

https://www.pub.gov.sg/wels


WE5
METERING & LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM
Content - Synopsis
participants to understand the importance of water metering to commissioning of plumbing system and
BMS to fulfil Owners aspiration. Though specification & selection of water meters are under the purview
of Consulting Engineers, commissioning process of metering system is similar to other building systems,
CxS still have to know the system configuration, review the OPR, BOD, relating them to other systems
such as BMS, reveal pre-function & functional checklists, etc. Without the proper installation of water
meters in the building, the green features of the water system may not be able to be commissioned and
calculation of water consumption will be hindered. The CxS should highlight the concern in early stage of
construction, preferably prior to bidding process.
The module will illustrate the common technologies of water meter and the constraints of each type of
meter during commissioning. Protection of outdoor water meters will be discussed. CxS should fill in the
gap between plumbing contractor with other building system contractors, such as ACMV and BMS trade.
The module will enable participants to appreciate common failure of malfunction water metering system
such as reliability, accuracy, interfacing, etc. and users concern on cost. This module will enable
participants to proactively coordinate the issues with various parties, including the designer, contractors
and supplier during Commissioning Meeting for successful construction of stable water meting system
while keeping fair costing & complexity. Briefing for fit-out tenant on additional water meter may be
necessary.
Objectives
Encourage the design of systems that monitors and manages water consumption.
Submission
Describe proposed provision of sub-meters of all major water consuming system/equipment and
interface with EMS. Tabulated inventory of as-installed sub-meters against building plans showing
location of sub-meters. Sample of actual EMS report recording consumption and simulated leakage.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the commonly water metering technologies, controls, interfacing and commissioning
requirements.
2)
interfaces and appreciate end-user concerns. Verify adequate metering for accountability.
3)
Coordinate with architect or engineer on the secondary consumption monitoring devices such as
pressure sensor or ultrasonic level meter for water tanks. Monitor water usage and calculate water
consumption, comparing the result to original expectation.
References
1)
Water Measurement Manual - Water Resources Research Laboratory, US Department of the

Interior Bureau of Reclamation

2)


IN1
INNOVATION IN DESIGN & ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN INITIATIVES
Content - Synopsis
This module on IN1 illustration is a 20 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation and aims to enable
participants to have an insight of various type of acceptable innovations by GBI and the corresponding
involvement of CxS. Not all innovation initiatives require the attention of CxS. The specification &
selection of innovation are normally under the purview of Architect, Consulting Engineers & Specialist
Designer, though the commissioning process of such system is similar to other building systems, CxS still
have to know the system configuration, review the OPR, BOD, relating them to other systems such as
BMS, review pre-function & functional checklists, etc.; if involvement of CxS is inevitable. Some
innovation though simple, may require specific performance verification procedures, for example, the
provision of humidity sensors upstream and downstream of desiccant heat recovery wheel is often
omitted due to cost but temporary data logger can be viable for commissioning and verification purposes.
The CxS should obtain details of innovation from other consultant and highlighted the concerns for
commissioning in early stage of construction, preferably prior to bidding process.
The module will illustrate the generally acceptance criteria for innovation and demonstrate the
commissioning process for some selected common innovations. The possibility of innovation is too
diverse to be covered in a short lecture.
The module will enable participants to appreciate common innovation and often neglected
commissioning provision. This module will enlighten participants to request for more information on
relevant innovations and proactively coordinate the necessary commissioning issues with various parties,
including the designer, contractors and supplier during Commissioning Meetings for normally not timetested innovation system and prepare the report to the construction team. Due to lack of benchmark for
new system, CxS should justify performance of innovation fairly.
Objectives
Provide design team and project the opportunity to be awarded points for exceptional innovative
provisions.
Submission
Report on each innovation, how it is derived, and how it would assist in reducing energy and/or
improving sustainable design, complete with drawings, manuals and maintenance write-up.
Learning Outcomes
1)
Recognize the common innovations, their respective technologies, controls, interfacing and
commissioning requirements. Similar approach for newer innovations.
2)
If relevant to CxS, perform design review on the system and submittal review to comment on
additional requirement from the commissioning and maintenance point of view. Recheck with
other building system interface and appreciate end-user concerns. Verify adequate metering or
sensors for accountability or performance verification.
References
1)


ADDITIONAL CXS DELIVERABLES FOR: FACADE COMMISSIONING, SRI MEASUREMENT,
INNOVATIONS, ETC
Content Synopsis
This additional illustrative Module is a 75 min lecture using Powerpoint presentation, which aims to
enable participants to have an insight of various possibility to assist the GBIF & Certifier to facilitate the
certification process while keeping un-compromised performance verification. This module intend to
enlighten CxS to go extra mile to assist green initiative. Three examples will be given in this module:
1)
2)
3)
Site measurement of SRI (Solar Reflectance Index) value:

For Greenery & Roof credits, the certified SRI value from manufacturer is desirable for construction
material or coating. However, not all manufacturers have sent their material for laboratory testing
according to ASTM E1980 using value of reflectance and emissivity. Some of the formed-in-situ
material can only have assumed SRI value anyway.
However, SRI can be measured at relatively good accuracy at site with pyranometer (for
reflectance) and infra-red camera (for emissivity). A fair methodology can be established at site by
taking reading around noon time under sunlight of a clear sky. The readings can then be keyed into
a spreadsheet calculation according to ASTM E1980 standard to arrive at the SRI value.
Faade Commissioning:
Though faade commissioning is only required in LEED Version 4, the GBIF or Certifier may be
interested to have some performance verification on faade construction as most of the submission
include only material data sheet on individual component material. The CxS can use various tools
such as blower door, infra-red camera, etc. to perform quantitative and qualitative evaluation on
faade of specific projects. BSRIA & NEBB has guideline on such tests.
Raised Floor Air Leakage Test:
As the popularity of raised floor construction increases, the leakage test is need if the floor void is
used as an underfloor air distribution channel. Minimum leakage is desirable to attain favorable
ACMV performance. ASHRAE has prescribed the testing method and CxS can supervised the test if
the contractor has the appropriate instruments.
The module illustrate the basis of test acceptance criteria for such tests and demonstrate the
commissioning process as it is applicable for quality assurance. The module enlighten participants to use
their expertise to assist certification by providing fair & affordable verification services.
Objectives
Upon request, CxS may use the expertise of their team to assist in verification process of other green
initiatives, which are conventionally not related to scope of works for CxS under GBI certification scheme.
Submission:
Special Verification Report on each credits, how it is derived, and how it would assist as alternative means
for performance verification and/or improving sustainable design, complete with drawings, methodology,
test data, calculation and reference to prevailing standards.
Learning Outcomes
As mentioned above. But the duration of module can be adjusted with continuation from other modules.

References
1)
GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides.


DEMONSTRATION OF COMMONLY USED INSTRUMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION
HANDS-ON EXPERIENCE WITH INSTRUMENTS
Content - Synopsis
In principles of commissioning, the CxS will not need to perform any field testing works for performance
verification of building system. These field testing, data collection & compilation of readings shall be
carried out by contractors. CxS merely has to dictate the testing methodology, review & approve
contractors counter-proposal, qualifying contractors personnel and instrument. CxS will review the
testing result and comment on the system performance with respect to GBI criteria. After all, for check &
balance, the party that reviews the test results, should not be the party who is taking the result at site
too.
However, according to ASHRAE Standard 202, CxS may perform quality base sampling verification on
overall testing results to synchronize the expectation and comprehension of CxS and Contractor with
respect to the testing intent. If such case is needed, the CxS will mobilize personnel from his company to
perform testing on site for selected systems & locations. More often than not, the instruments used by
CxS should be more sophisticated that those used by the Contractor.
This module will demonstrate the commonly used instruments by CxS in performance verification and
quality based sampling. These will include spot reading meters, data loggers, to more sophisticated
digital power meter, gas detector, infra-red camera, etc. Hands-on exposure will be given to individual
participant as well and this is the reason the size of the class should not be too large.
This illustrative Module and hands-on exposure is a 3 hours and 45 min lecture using Powerpoint
presentation and real time instruments with experiments. The module willalso include a Powerpoint
brief on NFPA 70E standard to highlight to participants the safety precaution to be observed when
working in close proximity to electrical installation. Proper PPE (personal protection equipment) has to be
worn. This briefing will last for 30-45 minutes.
This module will also include time for Q&A for participants on all preceding lectures, if any.
Objectives
To be able to specify the appropriate testing and performance verification methodology to contractors,
the CxS must have in-depth knowledge in the prevailing market trend of testing instrument in term of
technology, cost, accuracy and availability. CxS should know the advantages & limitation of specific
instrument and assess the techno-commercial decision for implementation.
CxS shall be able to review the submittal from Contractor on instrument used.
Submission
Catalogue, certificate & manual of instrument has to be submitted to CxS for review & approval.
Learning Outcomes
CxS shall become aware of the safety when working with electrical installation. CxS shall be able to devise
appropriate testing methodology for the Contractor and able to mobilize more sophisticated instrument
for quality based sample for performance verification.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS (MCQ)
Length
2 hours
Content - Synopsis
The Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) is a 2-hour examination which aims to test participants on the basic
understanding of principles of commissioning for green buildings. Participants shall recognize their role &
responsibility as appointed CxS for green building projects. CxS must be aware that their involvement
shall not be limited to criteria EE6 & EE7 but shall be extended to the activities on commissioned building
system and shall be interlinked with many other related criteria. Inputs from CxS is required for each of
these related criteria.
In general the CxS shall understand the essence of performance verification in GBI rating tools and in
particular, be able to carry out the commissioning process in systematic and harmonious manner while
demonstrating or exhibiting the value-added contribution of Commissioning to the project team.
The MCQ consists of 80 questions, covering all the teaching content and all the modules taught. All
questions offer four or five choices, with only one correct answer. A candidates score is based on 70 of
the questions; the other 10 questions, which are interspersed throughout the examination, are included
for trial or pilot purposes.
The MCQ is an open book examination where participants may bring in their Course textbook and other
documents. Computers, laptops or mobile phones are however, not permitted.
Objectives
1)
To test the knowledge on principles of commissioning, objectives, submissions and performance

verification criteria of GBI tools, commissioning procedures and role & responsibilities of GBI
Commissioning Specialist;
2)
To test the basic understanding of CxS related criteria and expected input from project team;
3)
To test the ability of specifying appropriate testing instrument and methodology for performance
verification process and interpretation of result.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of the MCQ, participants are assessed individually based on a simple passing mark of 50%.

PROJECT ASSIGNMENT & PRESENTATION
Length
1 hour
Content - Synopsis
The Project Assignment (PA) is a 1-hour interview & examination which aims to test participants in
applying the principle of commissioning as a CxS for a GBI certification project in a real life scenario.
Participants are given a write-up, raw data and details on several sample projects. In principle, each
participant has to complete the project assignment by himself within a two (2) week period. However,
as the scope of work for CxS is fairly diverse, the participant may seek help from other subject matter
experts but the compilation of deliverable must be done by the participant only.
Each participant must be able to present some or all of the following deliverables based on the given
information:
1)
Commissioning Plan & Schedule
2)
Commissioning Design Review & Issue Log
3)
Review comment on test data
4)
Outline of Commissioning Report
5)
Outline of Building User Manual
6)
Any other documentation
Each participant is given approximately two weeks to complete the Project Assessment (PA) and
deliverables must be submitted in PDF format at least two days before the interview or examination
(Exam) day. On Exam Day, each participant is allocated 30 minutes to present his deliverable, using the
submitted PDF files or in a separate Powerpoint presentation. Each participant will then be required to
answer questions raised by the Examiners, where the questions are directed randomly across all
modules taught during the lecture and practical session, relevant to the CxS activities.
Each participant is assessed on his overall performance during the presentation, whereupon if any of
the presentation is unsatisfactory, this may be compensated with other presentation and if some
questions cannot be answered for specific CxS related criteria due to participants background, the
proper answer to other questions can compensated for the shortcoming. Commissioning is expected to
be carried out by a team of experienced personnel but the CxS, as the team leader, has to be an expert
in at least a few specific fields and has general knowledge in other fields.
Objectives
1)
To test ability to prepare the deliverable to assist the Owner, GBIF and project team
2)
To test ability to provide input on commissioning requirement for CxS related criteria.
3)
To test ability to lead contractor in Commissioning Meetings
4)
To test ability to conclude performance verification process
Learning Outcomes
On completion of the PA, participants shall be able to:

1)
Understand principles of commissioning and satisfactorily deliver the value added contribution to
the project team
2)
Able to lead the construction team by proper communication, documentation & verification.
3)
Understand the necessity of working with O&M personnel to fine tune and enhance the system
performance.

GBICxS Course Syllabus PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

GBICxS Course Syllabus PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

TRAINING COURSE

Date : 23rd June, 2016

Date : 25th June, 2016

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

Offer an overall view on the global development of commissioning practice

Understand certification process of commissioning professionals.

Appreciate and recognize the evolution of commissioning practice.

Understand the recognition of commissioning in sustainability designs.

ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process 72

ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems 72

Guideline 1.1-2007 -- HVAC&R Technical Requirements for The Commissioning Process 69

PECI Model Commissioning Plans & Guide Specifications Downloaded

Functional Testing and Design Guides from www.ftguide.org Link saved in PC

GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides

LEED Reference Guide on commissioning

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process

ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems

Guideline 1.1-2007 -- HVAC&R Technical Requirements for The Commissioning Process

PECI Model Commissioning Plans & Guide Specifications

Functional Testing and Design Guides from www.ftguide.org

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides

LEED Reference Guide on commissioning

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

Timing of deliverables to be released to construction team and communication channel to bring

ASHRAE Guideline 0-2013 & Guideline 0-2005 -- The Commissioning Process

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

ASHRAE Standard 202-2013 -- Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems

GBI NRNC, NREB, INC and IEB Reference Guides

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

TABLE A: Criteria related to scope of CxS

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

Contribute to screenshot design of EMS console.

ASHRAE Guideline 13-2015 Specifying Building Automation System

ASHRAE Guideline 11-2009 Field Testing of HVAC Controls Components

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

Review appropriate type of auto-sensor and setting during commissioning.

Evaluate the energy efficiency of lighting control system.

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings 135

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

ELECTRICAL SUB-METERING & TENANT SUB-METERING

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

ADVANCED EE PERFORMANCE (RENEWABLE ENERGY)

NABCEP PV Installation Professional resource Guide.

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

ADVANCED EE PERFORMANCE (EE SYSTEMS)

MS 1525 : Code of Practice On Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE

Recommended Further Reading

GBI COMMISSIONING SPECIALIST COURSE