Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
v.
Eric J. LEONARD, Airman First Class
U.S. Air Force, Appellant
No. 05-0445
Crim. App. No. 35444
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Argued April 4, 2006
Decided August 9, 2006
GIERKE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which
CRAWFORD, EFFRON, BAKER, and ERDMANN, JJ., joined.
Counsel
For Appellant: Gary Myers, Esq. (argued); Lieutenant Colonel
Mark R. Strickland and Captain Anthony D. Ortiz (on brief);
Colonel Carlos L. McDade, Major Sandra K. Whittington, and Major
James M. Winner.
For Appellee: Major Michelle M. Lindo McCluer (argued);
Lieutenant Colonel Gary F. Spencer and Major Matthew Ward (on
brief); Lieutenant Colonel Michael E. Savage and Major John C.
Johnson.
Military Judge:
Thomas W. Pittman
First, whether
Also
Appellant drank
the intoxicated Appellant to her dorm room where they both fell
asleep on her bed.
During voir
bring his professional flying gear, that is, his flight helmet
or parachute, to her for servicing.
Trial defense
As to LTC D,
the military judge explained that his ruling was based on the
fact that the rape of LTC Ds daughter occurred five years ago
and his view that the unemotional demeanor LTC D displayed in
discussing the matter demonstrated LTC Ds fairness.
Regarding
12
R.C.M. 912(f)(4).
7
the merits.
13
United
However,
15
bias.20
public.21
Another important part of the challenge process of R.C.M.
912 is the specific procedure to preserve issues for appellate
review.
20
10
23
Moreover, R.C.M.
12
for his flying gear included packing his parachute and servicing
his pilot helmet.
trust.
This
25
26
27