Você está na página 1de 144

COMPREHENSIVEMOBILITYPLAN

February2012

MEERUT

DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ii ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

TableofContents
ChapterOne:

DataCollection.........................................................................................2

1.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................2
1.2 Secondarydatacollection..........................................................................................................2
1.3 Primarydatacollection..............................................................................................................2
1.4 Householdtravelsurveys...........................................................................................................4
1.5 Roadnetworkinventory............................................................................................................8
1.6 ScreenlineandOuterCordonvolumecounts.......................................................................10
1.7 Intersectionclassifiedvolumecounts......................................................................................11
1.8 SpeedandDelaysurveys.........................................................................................................12
1.9 Parkingsurveys........................................................................................................................15
1.10

Pedestriancrossingcountsurveys......................................................................................16

1.11

Intercity&localbuspassengercountandODforbothboardingandalightingpassengers

17

1.12

RailpassengercountandODforbothboardingandalightingpassengers........................17

ChapterTwo:

Dataanalysis..........................................................................................19

2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................19
2.2 Householddataanalysis..........................................................................................................19
2.2.1

Socioeconomiccharacteristics.......................................................................................19

2.2.2

Householdpersonalcharacteristics.................................................................................23

2.2.3

Householdtripcharacteristics.........................................................................................25

2.3 Roadinfrastructure..................................................................................................................28
2.3.1

About...............................................................................................................................28

2.3.2

Typeofcarriageway........................................................................................................30

2.3.3

Carriagewaywidth..........................................................................................................32

2.3.4

Availabilityoffootpath....................................................................................................34

2.3.5

RightofWay(ROW)........................................................................................................36

2.4 Outercordontrafficvolume....................................................................................................38

2.4.1

Roorkeeroad...................................................................................................................39

2.4.2

Mawanaroad(NH119)..................................................................................................40

2.4.3

Garhroad........................................................................................................................42

2.4.4

Hapurroad(SH18).........................................................................................................43

2.4.5

Delhiroad........................................................................................................................44

2.4.6

Baghpatroad...................................................................................................................45

iii ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.4.7 Badautroad.....................................................................................................................47
2.4.8

Sardhanaroad.................................................................................................................48

2.4.9

Parikshitgarhroad...........................................................................................................49

2.5 Intersectionvolumecount.......................................................................................................51
2.5.1

Begumpuljunction..........................................................................................................52

2.5.2

Eveschowk......................................................................................................................53

2.5.3

Indirachowk....................................................................................................................54

2.5.4

HapurAddajunction.......................................................................................................55

2.5.5

Zeromilejunction...........................................................................................................56

2.5.6

Lalkurtijunction...............................................................................................................57

2.5.7

BudhanaGatejunction....................................................................................................58

2.5.8

Khairnagarchowk...........................................................................................................59

2.5.9

Ghantagharjunction.......................................................................................................60

2.5.10

Railwayroadjunction.................................................................................................61

2.5.11

HRSchowk...................................................................................................................62

2.5.12

Tehsilchowk................................................................................................................63

2.5.13

Kaisarganjchowk........................................................................................................64

2.6 SpeedandDelay......................................................................................................................65
2.7 Parking.....................................................................................................................................67
2.8 Pedestriancount......................................................................................................................68
2.9 RailpassengerODforboardingandalightingpassengers......................................................69
2.9.1

AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingMeerutcityrailwaystation.........................69

2.9.2

DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengersusingMeerutcityrailwaystation.....................71

2.10

BuspassengerODforboardingandalightingpassengersatSohrabgatebusterminal....72

2.10.1

AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingSohrabgatebusterminal.......................72

2.10.2

DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengerusingSohrabgatebusterminal.....................73

2.11

BuspassengerODforboardingandalightingpassengersatBhainsalibusadda...............75

2.11.1

AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingBhainsalibusadda..................................75

2.11.2

DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengerusingBhainsalibusadda...............................76

ChapterThree: TravelDemandModel............................................................................79
3.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................79
3.2 Tripassignment........................................................................................................................82
3.3 Baseyeartravelpattern...........................................................................................................83
3.4 Baseyearmodeldevelopment................................................................................................83
3.5 Modelstructure.......................................................................................................................84

iv ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

3.6 Calibration................................................................................................................................85
3.7 Planningperiod........................................................................................................................86
3.8 Modes......................................................................................................................................86
3.9 Software...................................................................................................................................86
3.10

Studyareazoning................................................................................................................86

3.11

Networkdevelopment.........................................................................................................89

3.11.1

Highwaynetwork........................................................................................................89

3.11.2

Transitnetwork...........................................................................................................89

3.12

Baseyeartravelpattern......................................................................................................91

3.13

AssignmentandobservedODvalidation...........................................................................91

3.14

Tripcalibration.....................................................................................................................93

3.15

Triplengthdistribution........................................................................................................95

3.16

Combineddistributionmodel..............................................................................................96

3.17

Traveldemandforecast.......................................................................................................97

3.18

Horizonyearlandusescenario...........................................................................................98

3.19

Futuretransportnetworkscenarios....................................................................................99

3.19.1

Trafficforecastunderdonothingscenario(2031)..................................................99

3.20

TrafficforecastunderMobilityPlan..................................................................................100

3.21

Comparisonoftravelcharacteristicsforvariousscenarios:.............................................101

ChapterFour:

Publicawarenessandeducationprogramme.......................................119

4.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................119
4.2 CommunicationMedia..........................................................................................................120
4.3 OutlineMarketingPlanforpublictransport.........................................................................120
4.3.1

CommunicationObjectives............................................................................................120

4.3.2

TargetAudience............................................................................................................121

ChapterFive:

PublicPrivatePartnership....................................................................123

5.1 WhatisPublicPrivatePartnership........................................................................................123
5.2 PPPisdifferentfrompublicprocurementandprivatisation.................................................123
5.3 WhyPPP?...............................................................................................................................124
5.4 FormsofPPP..........................................................................................................................126
5.5 TypesofPPPVariant..............................................................................................................126
5.6 TypicalcontractualstructuresinPPP....................................................................................128
5.7 PPPinUrbanTransport..........................................................................................................130

v ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Listoftables
Table11:WardwisepopulationofMeerutcity...................................................................................4
Table12:Outercordonsurveylocations.............................................................................................10
Table13:Screenlinesurveylocations.................................................................................................10
Table14:Intersectionvolumecountsurveylocations........................................................................11
Table15:Pedestriansurveycountlocations.......................................................................................16
Table16:Boardingandalightingsurveylocations..............................................................................17
Table21:Distributionofhouseholdbysize........................................................................................20
Table22:DistributionofHHbyno.ofearningmembers....................................................................20
Table23:DistributionofHHsbymonthlyincome...............................................................................21
Table24:VehicleownershipstatusofHHs.........................................................................................22
Table25:ModewiseclassificationofHHtrips....................................................................................22
Table26:SexwisecompositionofHHs...............................................................................................24
Table27:AgegroupwiseclassificationofHHs...................................................................................24
Table28:OccupationstatusofHHs.....................................................................................................25
Table29:Householdtripcharacteristics.............................................................................................25
Table210:ModalshareforHHsandtheaveragetriplengthforvariousmodes...............................26
Table211:PurposewisetripdistributionforHHs..............................................................................26
Table212:ModewiseandpurposewisetripclassificationforHHs(includingcycle)........................27
Table213:ModewiseandpurposewisetripclassificationforHHs(excludingwalktrips)...............27
Table214:PurposewisetripclassificationbasedontriplengthforHHs...........................................28
Table215:Lengthofroadstretcheshavingdivided/undividedcarriageway.....................................30
Table216:Carriagewaywidthofroadstretches.................................................................................32
Table217:Availabilityoffootpathonroadstretches.........................................................................34
Table218:Roadclassificationbasedonrightofwayavailable..........................................................36
Table219:Outercordontrafficvolumes.............................................................................................39
Table220:Trafficvolumesatintersections.........................................................................................51
Table221:Parkingaccumulationatvariousparkinglocations...........................................................67
Table222:Pedestriancountatintersections......................................................................................69
Table223:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachMeerutcityrailwaystation.......................................69
Table224:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromMeerutcityrailwaystation.........................71
Table225:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachSohrabgatebusterminal..........................................72
Table226:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromSohrabgatebusterminal............................74
Table227:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachBhainsalibusadda....................................................75
Table228:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromBhainsalibusadda.......................................77

vi ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Table31:Summaryofbaseyeartraveldemand.................................................................................91
Table32:ResultsofobservedODvalidationonScreenlines..............................................................92
Table33:BaseyearobservedODvalidationonoutercordonlocations............................................92
Table34:TrafficcharacteristicsBaseyear(2011).............................................................................93
Table35:TrafficcharacteristicsonmajorroadsforBaseyear(2011)................................................93
Table36:Baseyearpopulationandemploymentforstudyarea.......................................................94
Table37:Calibratedmodechoiceparameters....................................................................................97
Table38:Populationprojectionforthestudyarea............................................................................98
Table39:Employmentprojectionforthestudyarea.........................................................................99
Table310:SummaryofForecastedPeakHourPassengerDemand(2031)........................................99
Table311:Trafficcharacteristicsofstudyareain2031under"donothing"scenario.......................99
Table312:Majorroadtrafficforecastsin2031underdonothingscenario.................................100
Table313:Trafficcharacteristicsofstudyareain2031MobilityPlan...........................................101
Table314:Majorroadtrafficforecastsin2031MobilityPlan.......................................................101
Table315:Comparisonoftravelcharacteristics...............................................................................101
Table316:Populationprojectionsforthestudyarea.......................................................................103
Table317:Employmentprojectionsforstudyarea..........................................................................110
Table51:DifferencebetweenPPP,publicprocurementandprivatisation......................................123
Table52:BenefitsofPPPstostakeholders.......................................................................................124
Table53:ExamplesofPPPs...............................................................................................................126
Table54:ContractualstructuresofPPPs..........................................................................................129
Table55:Listofbusstopsforinstallingbussignage.........................................................................132

vii ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

ListofFigures
Figure11:WardmapforMeerutcity....................................................................................................7
Figure12:Roadinventorysurveylocations..........................................................................................9
Figure13:Trafficsurveylocations.......................................................................................................12
Figure14:SpeedandDelaysurveystretches......................................................................................14
Figure15:Parkingsurveylocations.....................................................................................................16
Figure21:Distributionofhouseholdsbysize......................................................................................20
Figure22:No.ofearningmembersperhousehold.............................................................................21
Figure23:DistributionofHHsbymonthlyincome.............................................................................21
Figure24:Percentageexpenditureofhouseholdsontransport........................................................22
Figure25:DistributionofHHsbyno.ofvehiclesowned....................................................................23
Figure26:ModewisevehicularcompositionofHHs..........................................................................23
Figure27:SexwisecompositionofHHs..............................................................................................24
Figure28:AgegroupwiseclassificationofHHs..................................................................................24
Figure29:OccupationalprofileofHHs................................................................................................25
Figure210:ModalsplitforHHs...........................................................................................................26
Figure211:TripdistributionbypurposeforHHs................................................................................27
Figure212:ExistingroadnetworkofMeerutcity...............................................................................29
Figure213:Compositionofroadbycarriagewaytype........................................................................30
Figure214:RoadStretcheshavingdivided/undividedcarriageway..................................................31
Figure215:Roadclassificationbasedoncarriagewaywidth..............................................................32
Figure216:Mapshowingroadsaccordingtocarriagewaywidth.......................................................33
Figure217:Classificationofroadsbasedonavailabilityoffootpaths................................................34
Figure218:Roadstretcheswithfootpathpresent/absent................................................................35
Figure219:Roadclassificationbasedonrightofwayavailable.........................................................36
Figure220:ROWofroadstretches.....................................................................................................37
Figure221:Directionalsplitoftrafficatoutercordonlocations........................................................38
Figure222:Trafficvolumecountatvarioussurveylocations.............................................................38
Figure223:TrafficvolumeatRoorkeeroadat15minutesinterval....................................................39
Figure224:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Roorkeeroad).................................................40
Figure225:Vehicularcomposition(Roorkeeroad).............................................................................40
Figure226:TrafficvolumeatMawanaroadat15minuteinterval.....................................................41
Figure227:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Mawanaroad)................................................41
Figure228:Vehicularcomposition(Mawanaroad)............................................................................41
Figure229:TrafficvolumeatGarhroadat15minuteinterval...........................................................42

viii ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure230:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Garhroad)......................................................42
Figure231:Vehicularcomposition(Garhroad)..................................................................................43
Figure232:TrafficvolumeatHapurroadat15minuteinterval.........................................................43
Figure233:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Hapurroad)....................................................44
Figure234:Vehicularcomposition(Hapurroad)................................................................................44
Figure235:TrafficvolumeatDelhiroadat15minuteinterval..........................................................44
Figure236:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Delhiroad)......................................................45
Figure237:Vehicularcomposition(Delhiroad)..................................................................................45
Figure238:TrafficvolumecountatBaghpatroadat15minuteinterval...........................................46
Figure239:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(BaghpatRoad)................................................46
Figure240:Vehicularcomposition(Baghpatroad).............................................................................46
Figure241:TrafficvolumecountatBadautroadat15minuteinterval.............................................47
Figure242:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Badautroad)...................................................47
Figure243:Vehicularcomposition(Badautroad)...............................................................................48
Figure244:TrafficvolumeatSardhanaroadat15minuteinterval...................................................48
Figure245:Fastvs.Slowvehicle&Directionalsplit(Sardhanaroad).................................................49
Figure246:Vehicularcomposition(Sardhanaroad)...........................................................................49
Figure247:TrafficvolumeatParikshitgarhroadat15minuteinterval.............................................49
Figure248:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Parikshitgarhroad).........................................50
Figure249:Vehicularcomposition(Parikshitgarhroad).....................................................................50
Figure250:Peakhourtrafficflow:Begumpuljunction.......................................................................52
Figure251:PeakhourtrafficflowEveschowk..................................................................................53
Figure252:Peakhourtrafficflow:Indirachowk................................................................................54
Figure253:PeakhourtrafficflowHapurAddajunction..................................................................55
Figure254:PeakhourtrafficflowZeromilejunction......................................................................56
Figure255:PeakhourtrafficflowLalkurtijunction..........................................................................57
Figure256:Peakhourtrafficflow:BudhanaGatejunction................................................................58
Figure257:PeakhourtrafficflowKhairnagarchowk.......................................................................59
Figure258:PeakhourtrafficflowGhantagharjunction...................................................................60
Figure259:PeakhourtrafficflowRailwayroadjunction................................................................61
Figure260:PeakhourtrafficflowHRSchowk..................................................................................62
Figure261:PeakhourtrafficflowTehsilchowk...............................................................................63
Figure262:PeakhourtrafficflowKaisarganjchowk.......................................................................64
Figure263:Journeyspeedsobservedforvariousroadstretchesinthecity......................................65
Figure264:AveragejourneyspeedonvariousroadstretchesinMeerutcity...................................66
Figure265:ParkingdemandatvariouslocationsofMeerut..............................................................67

ix ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure266:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatMeerutcityrailwaystation)
......................................................................................................................................................70
Figure267:CharacteristicofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachMeerutcity
railwaystation..............................................................................................................................70
Figure268:CharacteristicofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromMeerut
cityRailwayStation......................................................................................................................71
Figure269:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatMeerutcityrailwaystation)
......................................................................................................................................................72
Figure270: DistributionofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachSohrabgatebus
terminal........................................................................................................................................73
Figure271: Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatSohrabgatebusterminal)73
Figure272:DistributionofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromSohrabgate
busterminal.................................................................................................................................74
Figure273:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatSohrabgatebusterminal)75
Figure274: CharacteristicofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachBhainsalibus
adda..............................................................................................................................................76
Figure275: Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatBhainsalibusadda)..........76
Figure276:DistributionofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromBhainsali
busadda.......................................................................................................................................77
Figure277:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatBhainsalibusadda)...........77
Figure31:Fourstagemodelingprocess..............................................................................................80
Figure32:CalibrationoftheGravitymodel........................................................................................81
Figure33:Trafficassignmentsubmodel............................................................................................83
Figure34:Transportmodelingframework..........................................................................................84
Figure35:Methodologyfortraveldemandmodeling........................................................................85
Figure36:ModelstructureinCUBE....................................................................................................87
Figure37:Studyareatrafficanalysiszones(TAZ)...............................................................................88
Figure38:Transitnetworkforbaseyear.............................................................................................90
Figure39:Roadnetworkforbaseyear...............................................................................................90
Figure310:Desirelinediagramforbaseyear(2011).........................................................................94
Figure311:Triplengthdistributionfortwowheelers........................................................................95
Figure312:Triplengthdistributionforcars........................................................................................95
Figure313:TriplengthdistributionforAutorickshaws......................................................................96
Figure314:Triplengthdistributionforpublictransportsystem........................................................96
Figure315:Methodologyfortraveldemandforecast........................................................................98
51:SchematicdesignforBusstopsignage........................................................................................133

1 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

ANNEXUREI:DATAANALYSIS

2 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

ChapterOne:

DataCollection

1.1 Introduction
ToassesstheexistingtrafficandtransportationsituationinMeerut,thefollowingprimary
andsecondarydatawascollectedaspartofthestudyforthestudyarea.

1.2 Secondarydatacollection
Thefollowingsecondarydatawascollected:

Existingstudies,reports,andproposals

CityDevelopmentPlan

MasterPlanforMeerut,2021

VisionPlanforMeerut

Inventoryofplanned/proposedandongoingprojects

Existingtransportinfrastructure

Roadnetworkmap

Citydetails

Totalpopulationaspercensus2001andpopulationtrend

Existinglistofwards

Wardwisepopulationandemployment

Wardarea

Existingandfuturedistributionoflanduse

Vehicleregistrationdataofacity

Locationofbus/air/railterminallocations

1.3 Primarydatacollection
In any transport planning exercise, data collection is the cornerstone and is the very
foundationonwhichreststhesuperstructure.
ThefollowingprimarysurveyswereconductedatvariouslocationsinMeeruttoassessthe
trafficandtransportscenario:

Householdtravelsurveys(1741HHs)

Roadnetworkinventory(232kms)

Classifiedtrafficcountatoutercordon(24Hrs.)(9locations)

3 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Classifiedtrafficcountatintersections(16Hrs)(15locations)

Classifiedtrafficcountatscreenline(16Hrs.)(7locations)

ODinterviewsurveysatoutercordon(24Hrs.)(9locations)

SpeedandDelaysurveys(127kms)

Onstreetparkingsurveys(12Hrs.)(500mRoadstretch)(4locations)

Pedestriancrossingcountsurveys(atintersectionsblock)(15locations)

Pedestriancrossingcountsurveys(onmidblock)(11locations)

Busoccupancysurveysatscreenlines(7locations)

BusterminalODinterviewsurvey(4locations)

Railwayterminalsurvey(1location)

Operatorsurveys(20samples)

Useropinionsurveys(50samples)

AllsurveyformatsarepresentedinAnnexure9.Detailsofthesurveysconductedandtheir
locationsaregivenbelow.

4 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

1.4 Householdtravelsurveys
Objective of the survey: The house hold survey provides the data which is used for
describingthetravelpatternsinthecityandtravelpreferencesofitsresidents.
Scope of the survey: Collection of data on socioeconomic characteristics, household
membersandtheirtraveldiarycoveringasizeof1%oftotalpopulation.
Conduct of the survey: The survey questionnaire comprises of three sections, a) Socio
economicdatasheet,b)Householdmembercharacteristicdatasheet,andc)Traveldiaryof
eachindividualmemberofthehousehold.Thetraveldiarysectionrequestsinformationof
all trips made by each person in the household on the previous day. This information
includesthetimeofthetrip,thetrippurpose,theaddressofthetripstarting,endingplace
andthemodeoftravel.Thisdataiscollectedbyvisitingafixedsampleineachareaofthe
town(zone).EachHouseholdconstitutesasample.
Theoutputsfromthesurveyinclude:

Householdtripratesfordifferentsubareasintheregionandaveragetriprateforthe
region.

Detailedorigin/destinationtripmatrixbymodeandbypurpose

Triplengthdistributions,bytrippurposeandbymode

ForMeerutcity,eachWardwastakentobeaZoneandforeachzone(ward),1%ofsamples
(Households)weresurveyedamountingtoatotalof1741HHs.
ThewardwisedistributionofHouseholdsisgiveninTable11andthewardmapisshownin
Figure11.
Table11:WardwisepopulationofMeerutcity

MunicipalWardNo..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Population
13,361
14,924
13,131
15,361
13,391
14,469
13,985
14,947
14,185

Households
2,155
2,407
2,118
2,478
2,160
2,334
2,256
2,411
2,288

Samplesizetaken
22
24
21
25
23
23
23
24
23

5 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

MunicipalWardNo..
Population
Households
Samplesizetaken
10
12,271
1,979
20
11
14,072
2,270
23
12
11,389
1,837
18
13
14,177
2,287
24
14
14,574
2,351
24
15
15,286
2,465
25
16
14,734
2,376
24
17
15,228
2,456
25
18
15,330
2,473
25
19
14,961
2,413
24
20
13,389
2,160
22
21
14,480
2,335
24
22
12,477
2,012
20
23
13,943
2,249
22
24
15,201
2,452
25
25
11,588
1,869
19
26
13,043
2,104
21
27
12,972
2,092
21
28
12,084
1,949
19
29
12,978
2,093
22
30
12,638
2,038
20
31
12,363
1,994
20
32
12,487
2,014
20
33
12,435
2,006
20
34
15,319
2,471
25
35
15,182
2,449
24
36
12,096
1,951
21
37
13,895
2,241
22
38
12,296
1,983
20
39
14,080
2,271
24
40
11,780
1,900
19
41
14,758
2,380
24
42
12,642
2,039
21
43
12,211
1,970
20
44
14,587
2,353
24
45
11,408
1,840
18
46
12,243
1,975
21
47
12,364
1,994
20
48
11,998
1,935
19
49
14,952
2,412
24
50
13,049
2,105
21
51
12,254
1,976
20
52
15,027
2,424
24
53
13,560
2,187
22
54
11,741
1,894
19

6 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

MunicipalWardNo..
Population
Households
Samplesizetaken
55
12,216
1,970
20
56
13,052
2,105
21
57
13,168
2,124
24
58
15,179
2,448
25
59
11,766
1,898
20
60
12,013
1,938
19
61
12,342
1,991
20
62
12,545
2,023
20
63
12,109
1,953
20
64
12,609
2,034
20
65
15,136
2,441
24
66
12,328
1,988
20
67
12,563
2,026
20
68
14,636
2,361
26
69
12,415
2,002
20
70
11,446
1,846
18
71
14,797
2,387
24
72
12,202
1,968
20
73
14,974
2,415
25
74
14,410
2,324
23
75
13,433
2,167
22
76
12,792
2,063
21
77
12,351
1,992
20
78
14,958
2,413
24
79
12,586
2,030
20
80
11,400
1,839
18
TOTAL
10,68,722
1,72,375
1,741

7 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure11:WardmapforMeerutcity

8 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

1.5 Roadnetworkinventory
Objective of the Survey: Road network inventory aims at updating the network database
with the existing features of roadway sections covering all arterial, sub arterial and other
important local/connecting links in the study area. The survey validates existing road
networkdataavailablefortheregionandcollectstheroadnetworkdetailsfortheroadway
sections.
Conduct of the Survey: For all the major road sections in the study area, a fullscale
inventory surveys is undertaken to create a road network database. Inventories of the
followingfacilitieswillbeundertakenaspartofthetask:

Roadnetwork

Sectionlength

Effectiveroadwidth

Medianwidthandtype

Qualityofridingsurface

Adjoininglanduseandavailableaccesscontrol

Intersectionfacilities

Pedestrianfacilities

Parkingfacilities

Trafficcontrolmeasures

Detailsaboutencroachments

Roadmarkingsandsignage

Streetfurniture

PT/IPTpassengercollectionpoints

KeyOutputs:Roadtransportnetworkdatabaseofthestudyarea
ForMeerutcity,allmajorroadstretcheswerepickedupforroadinventorysurveycovering
232kms.ThelocationoftheroadnetworkinventorysurveyisgiveninFigure12.

9 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure12:Roadinventorysurveylocations

10 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

1.6 ScreenlineandOuterCordonvolumecounts
Objectiveofthesurvey:Thesesurveysareconductedatidentifiedscreenlinelocationsfor
16 hours covering morning and evening peak hours. Traffic count surveys are also
conducted at the outer cordon points identified for 24 hrs duration to assess the floating
population and to establish the peak to daily flow ratios. The screen line is identified to
analysetheexistingtraffictravellingthroughthestudyarea.
Scope of the survey: Counting of vehicles classified by the type of vehicle crossing the
screenlines/cordonduringthespecifiedduration.
Conductofthesurvey:Manualtrafficcountsarecarriedoutonatypicalworkingdayatall
locationslistedabove.Ateachidentifiedstation,bothdirectionalcountsarecarriedoutby
vehicle type. I.e. cars, jeeps, vans, buses, trucks, MAVs, LCVs tractors, motorized two
wheelersandslowmovingvehicles.
ForMeerutcity,OuterCordoncountwasconductedat9locations,whileScreenlinecount
wasconductedat7locations,whicharegiveninTables12and13.

Table12:Outercordonsurveylocations

S.No.

OuterCordonlocations

RoorkeeRoad

MawanaRoad

ParikshitgarhRoad

GarhmukteshwarRoad

HapurRoad

DelhiRoad

BaghpatRoad

BadautRoad

SardhanaRoad

Table13:Screenlinesurveylocations

S.No.

Screenlinelocations

MDR34WDrainCrossingnearPrempuri

DelhiRoaddraincrossingnearKabariBazaar

SH14canalcrossingnearMuftian

PilokariRoadcrossingnearMasudNagar

Islamabadroaddraincrossing

SH18draincrossingnearZaidinagar

PVSroaddraincrossingnearVasundharacolony

11 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

1.7 Intersectionclassifiedvolumecounts
Objectives: Surveys are conducted at critical intersections identified within the city. The
data helps in realizing the seriousness of problem at the intersection, critical movements,
etc.andfordesigningthejunctiontoperformmoreefficiently.
Scope of Survey: Counting of vehicles classified by the type of vehicles at the selected
locationsfor16hourscoveringallturningmovementsatthejunctionseparately.
ConductoftheSurvey:Manualtrafficcountsarecarriedoutonatypicalworkingday.
ForMeerutcity,classifiedvolumecountwasconductedat13intersectionsasgiveninTable
14.

Table14:Intersectionvolumecountsurveylocations

S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

Intersectionclassifiedvolumecountsurveylocation
Begumpul
Eveschowk
Khairnagarchowk
Indirachowk
Hapuraddachowk
Zeromilejunction
Lalkurtijunction
Budhanagatejunction
Ghantagharjunction
Railwayroadjunction
HRSchowk
Tehsilchowk
Kaisarganjchowk

AmapshowinglocationoftheseprimarysurveysisgiveninFigure13.

12 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure13:Trafficsurveylocations

1.8 SpeedandDelaysurveys
Survey Objective: The principle objective of the study is to find out the journey speed,
runningspeedandtypesofdelaysuchasstoppeddelayandoperationaldelaytoevaluate
thelevelofserviceorqualityoftrafficflowofaroadorentireroadnetworksystem.
ScopeofWork:

Carryoutthesurveysduringonlypeakperiodinbothdirections.

Collection of delay information on different road stretches and at intersections/level


crossingsinthestudyarea.

Identificationofbottlenecks.

13 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Conduct of the Survey: The survey is conducted using moving car observer method. The
enumeratorstravelalongthestreambynotingdownthestartingtime,endtime,distance
travelledandthetimeofstopofthevehicleontheroadstretches,atintersectionsandthe
reasonsforthesame.
KeyOutputs

Travelspeedandjourneyspeed

Delaysalongeachoftheselectedcorridorsbytype/reason

Intersectiondelays

For Meerut city, the survey was conducted on all major corridors for 127 kms as given in
Figure14.

14 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure14:SpeedandDelaysurveystretches

15 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

1.9 Parkingsurveys
Survey objective: The principal objective of thestudy is toassess the demand forparking
andcharacteristicsoftheparkedvehicles.
Scope of the survey: The survey is conducted for a period of 16 hours on important
commercialareaswhereparkingispredominantandisneededtoplanfacilities.
Conduct of the survey:On street parking surveys is carried out on all important locations
with work centres, business centres, shopping complexes and tourist places. Enumerators
are asked to note the vehicle type and registration number of parked vehicles every 1/2
hour. Information is also collected on associated parking fees (if any). The survey is
conductedonselectedstretchesofmajorcorridorsandotherprimeoffstreetlocationsin
thestudyarea.
KeyOutputs

Peakparkingdemandperiodbylocation

Parkingdemandbyvehicletype

Parkingdurationinformation

ForMeerutcity,onstreetparkingsurveywascarriedoutat8locations.

St.JosephtoHotelNavincrossing

NavinHoteltoBegumpul

BegumpultoGangaPlaza

St.JosephtoBegumpul

HotelNavincrossingtoSt.Joseph

BegumpultoNavinHotel

BegumpultoNavinPlaza

BegumpultoSt.Joseph

Amapshowingthelocationswhereparkingsurveyswereconductedinthecoreareaofthe
cityisgiveninFigure15.

16 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure15:Parkingsurveylocations

1.10 Pedestriancrossingcountsurveys
Objectiveofthesurvey:Theobjectiveofthesurveyistoquantifytheextentofpedestrian
movementinordertodesignfacilitiesforsuchmovement.
Scope of work: Pedestrian count surveys are conducted at locations where heavy
pedestrian movement is observed. The survey also covers locations abutting major traffic
attractionzoneslikemallsandmajorworkcenrtesandimportantjunctions.Thepedestrian
countistakenalongandacrosseacharmofthejunction.
For Meerut city, pedestrian crossing count surveys were conducted at 12 intersections as
giveninTable15.
Table15:Pedestriansurveycountlocations

S.No. PedestrianCountSurveyLocations
1
Begumpuljunction
2
Lalkurtijunction

17 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

S.No. PedestrianCountSurveyLocations
3
Bachhapark
4
Eveschowk
5
OldHapurAddachowk
6
Budhanagate
7
Khairnagarjunction
8
Ghantagharjunction
9
Railwayroadjunction
10 HRSchowk
11 Tehsilchowk
12 Kaisarganjchowk

1.11 Inter city & local bus passenger count and OD for both boarding and
alightingpassengers
Objectiveofthesurvey:Toevaluatethepercentageofpeopleusingbustransportandto
identifythecharacteristicsofintercitytravellersusingthepublictransportsystem.
Scope of work: Conduct the survey for a period of 16 hours covering peak period on
importantbusstops.Countofbusesinandoutofstationsalongwiththeoccupancyand
conductasampleODsurveyofpassengers.
Theoutputsfromthesurveyinclude:

Thetravel&trafficcharacteristicsoftheintercitybustravellers.

Publictransporttripmatrixandtheexistingdemandandsupplyscenarios

ForMeerutcity,boardingandalightingsurveyswasconductedat2busstandsasgivenin
Table16.

Table16:Boardingandalightingsurveylocations

S.No.
1
2

Busstop

Sohrabgatebusstand
Bhainsalibusstand

1.12 Rail passenger count and OD for both boarding and alighting
passengers
Objective of the Survey: To evaluate the percentage of people usingrail transport and to
identifythecharacteristicsofintercitytravellers

18 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

ScopeofWork:Conductthesurveyforaperiodof16hoursatrailwaystations.
Theoutputsfromthesurveyinclude:

Thetravel&trafficcharacteristicsoftheintercitybustravellers.

Railtripmatrixandtheexistingdemandandsupplyscenarios
ForMeerutcity,therailwaypassengercountsurveywasconductedattheMeerutcity
Railwaystation.

19 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

ChapterTwo:

Dataanalysis

2.1 Introduction
Assessment of traffic characteristics within an urban area is an essential prerequisite to
appreciatetheproblemswithrespecttotrafficmovementandtounderstandtheneedfor
organizing the same in an efficient and economical manner. Traffic characteristics help in
appreciating the spatial and temporal features of travel within the area, relationship of
trafficintensitywithnetworkcapacityandtheprevailinglevelofserviceobtainedonvarious
corridorsofthenetworkinthestudyarea.Thisappreciationandunderstandingisessential
foridentifyingthepresentconditionsandconstraintsforformulatingsuitablepoliciesand
strategies,selectingrelevantsystemsanddesigningindividualcomponentsofthesystem.
In order to appreciate the traffic and transport system characteristics, a number of field
trafficsurveyswereconductedwithinthestudyareaasgivenabove.Thissectionpresents
thesurveyfindings.

2.2 Householddataanalysis
Householdtravelsurveyhasbeenconductedtobringoutthesocioeconomicandtravel
characteristicsoftheresidentsintheMeerutcity.Theinformationcollectedthroughsurvey
includes household size, education level, income, vehicle ownership, travel pattern, mode
choice, expenditure on transport etc. To ensure that the sample was representative, the
householdsselectedforthesurveyweredistributedthroughoutthestudyareainthesame
proportionasthedistributionofpopulation.About1%sampleofthetotalhouseholdshas
beendrawnandtotalof1741householdshavebeeninterviewed.
The analyses of the socioeconomic and travel characteristics are presented in following
sections:
2.2.1 Socioeconomiccharacteristics
HouseholdSize
According to Census 2001, the population of Meerut is 10.6 lakhs. The number of
households surveyed is 1741 which constitutes 0.15% sample of the total households
presentinthecity.TheaveragehouseholdsizeforMeerutcityhasbeenfoundtobe4.1.
ThedistributionofhouseholdsbysizeisshowninTable21andFigure21.

20 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Table21:Distributionofhouseholdbysize

HouseholdSize
1
2
3
4
5
6andabove

Percentage
2.6
5.9
20.0
35.9
22.8
12.7

2%
13%

6%

20%
23%

3
4
5

36%
6andabove

Figure21:Distributionofhouseholdsbysize

Earners
Thedistributionofhouseholdsbythenumberofearningmembers,asshowninTable22
and Figure 22, indicates that 80% of the households in Meerut city have a single earning
member.
Table22:DistributionofHHbyno.ofearningmembers

No.ofEarningMembers
0
1
2
3
4andabove

Percentage
0
80.0
15.6
3.6
0.9

21 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

No.ofearningmembersperHH
1%0%

3%

16%

1
2
3

80%

4andabove

Figure22:No.ofearningmembersperhousehold

HouseholdIncome
TheaveragehouseholdincomeofthepeopleofMeerutisRs.15,200/monthasshownin
Table23andFigure23.Onanaverage,eachhouseholdspendsaround5%ofitsmonthly
incomeontransportation,asshowninFigure24.

Table23:DistributionofHHsbymonthlyincome

AverageIncome
<=5000
5,00010,000
10,00020,000
20,00030,000
30,00050,000
>50,000

DistributionofHHsbyMonthlyIncome
0%

Percentage PercentageExpenditureonTransport
10.3
6
23.2
5
42.5
5
18.7
4
5.0
5
0.3
6

5%

<=5000

10%

5,000 10,000

19%

10,000 20,000
23%

20,000 30,000
30,000 50,000

>50,000
43%

Figure23:DistributionofHHsbymonthlyincome

22 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

%ExpenditureonTransport

6
5

4
%Expenditureon
Transport

2
1

0
<=5000

5,000
10,000

10,000
20,000

20,000
30,000

30,000
50,000

>50,000

Figure24:Percentageexpenditureofhouseholdsontransport

VehicleOwnership
The average vehicular ownership of the people of Meerut is 0.9 vehicles/ household
(includingbicycles)and8%householdsdonotownanyvehicleasshowninTable24and
Figure 26. Bicycle and twowheeler constitutes almost 90% of the total vehicular
compositionasshowninTable25andFigure25.

Table24:VehicleownershipstatusofHHs

No.ofVehiclesOwned
0
1
2
3
4
5andabove

Percentage
8.1
44.9
36.3
8.7
1.7
0.3

Table25:ModewiseclassificationofHHtrips

Mode
Bicycles
2Wheelers
Cars/Vans
AutoRickshaw
Others

Percentage
43.3
47.1
8.4
0.8
0.5

23 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

DistributionofHHsbyno.ofvehiclesowned
2%

9%

0%
8%

1
2

3
36%

45%

4
5andabove

Figure25:DistributionofHHsbyno.ofvehiclesowned

Modewiseclassification

1% 1%

8%

Bicycles

2Wheelers

43%

Cars/Vans
AutoRickshaw

47%

Others

Figure26:Modewisevehicularcomposition ofHHs

2.2.2 Householdpersonalcharacteristics
Ageandsexwisecomposition
ThesexratioofMeerutis871asperCensusofIndia2001.58%ofthesurveyedpopulation
constitutedofmaleswhilefemalesconstitutedonly42%asshowninTable26andFigure2
7.Almost50%ofthepopulationliesintheagegroupof1845,i.e.theworkingagegroup.
25%populationisintheagegroupof517,whileonly5%populationif60+.Thisisshown
inTable27andFigure28.

24 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Table26:SexwisecompositionofHHs

Sex
Male
Female

Percentage
57.7
42.3

Table27:AgegroupwiseclassificationofHHs

AgeGroup
<=5
517.
1824
2534
3544
4558
5964
6574
>75

Percentage
10.0
25.4
14.9
16.0
17.7
12.5
3.4
1.4
0.2

DistributionofPopulationonthebasisofSex

42%

Male
Female
58%

Figure27:Sexwisecomposition ofHHs

30.0
25.0
20.0

15.0
%

10.0
5.0

0.0
<=5

5 18 25 35 45 59 65 >75
17. 24 34 44 58 64 74
Figure28:Agegroupwiseclassification ofHHs

25 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

OccupationStatus
Nearly34%ofthetotalpopulationconsistsofstudents.Only26%ofthepeoplearefulltime
employedeitherinservicesectororselfemployed,asshowninTable28andFigure29.
Table28:OccupationstatusofHHs

Occupation
FullTime
PartTime
SelfEmployed
Student
Retired
Housewife
Unemployed
Others

Percentage
10.6
6.3
15.1
33.5
1.4
29.5
1.6
2.0

2% 2%
FullTime

11%

PartTime

6%
29%
15%

SelfEmployed
Student
Retired
Housewife

1%

34%

Unemployed
Others

Figure29:OccupationalprofileofHHs

2.2.3 Householdtripcharacteristics
Thepercapitatriprate(PCTR)ofMeerutis1.02(includingwalktrips).Walktripsconstitute
a major part (32%) of the total trips being undertaken every day. The per capita trip rate
excludingwalktripscomesouttobeonly0.70.TheaveragetriplengthforMeerutcomes
outtobe5.64km,asmentionedinTable29.

Table29:Householdtripcharacteristics

PCTR(includingwalktrips)
PCTR(excludingwalktrips)
AverageTripLength(Km.)

1.02
0.70
5.64

Excludingthewalktrips,2wheelerandIPThavethehighestmodalsharewithrespectively
33% and 29% passengers using these to commute. The average trip length for public

26 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

transportmodesis33km,forautosandtaxiis11.55km.Theaveragetriplengthforprivate
vehiclesis6.7km,asshowninTable210andFigure210.

Table210:ModalshareforHHsandtheaveragetriplengthforvariousmodes

Mode
Percentage(includingWalkTrips) Averagetriplength(km.)
Walk
31.8
1.03
Cycle
14.9
3.7
TwoWheeler
22.8
5.9
Car/Van/Jeep
1.8
7.5
PT
8.6
33.05
IPT
20.1
11.55
Figure210:ModalsplitforHHs

Modalsplit(includingwalktrips)

Modalsplit(ExcludingWalkTrips)

Walk

20%

32%

8%

Cycle
TwoWheeler

Cycle

29%

22%

Car/Van/Jeep

Car/Van/Jeep

2%
23%

15%

PT

TwoWheeler

PT

13%

33%

IPT

IPT

3%

Morethanhalfofthetrips(53%)arebeingmadeforeducationalpurposesand32%ofthe
tripsarebeingmadeforworkpurposeasshowninTable211andFigure211.
Table211:PurposewisetripdistributionforHHs

TripPurpose
Work
Education
SelfBusiness
Shopping
SocialandRecreation
Others

Percentage
32.3
53.4
12.6
0.7
0.2
0.9

27 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Tripdistributionbypurpose

0%

1%

1%

Work

13%

Education

32%
Selfbusiness

Shopping

53%
Socialand
Recreation

Figure211:Tripdistributionbypurpose forHHs

More than 50% of the work trips are made by cycle (21%) and twowheelers (33%), as
shown in Table 212. The predominant choice for educational (43%) and shopping (34%)
tripsisbywalking.

Table212:ModewiseandpurposewisetripclassificationforHHs(includingcycle)

Trip
Purpose/
Modeof
travel
Work

Percentageoftrip
PT
PT
(Pvt.
(MCTSL)
Bus)
3
5

20

21

33

Car/
Van/
Jeep
2

Education

43

10

11

27

100

Selfbusiness
Shopping
Social&
recreation
Others
Grandtotal

19
34

17
0

43
20

4
14

1
0

4
0

0
0

11
32

100
100

27

13

60

100

25
32

22
15

13
23

5
2

3
2

7
4

0
2

25
20

100
100

Walk Cycle

2
Wh

PT
(Rail)

Auto
Rickshaw

Total

12

100

Excluding the walk trips, the predominant mode used for performing trips for various
purposes is twowheeler. 42% work trips, 53% business trips have been made by two
wheeler,asshowninTable213.

Table213:ModewiseandpurposewisetripclassificationforHHs(excludingwalktrips)

Trip
Purpose/
Modeof
Cycle 2Wh
travel
Work
26
42
Education
18
20
SelfBusiness 21
53
Shopping
0
31
Social&
27
13
Recreation

Percentagedistributionoftrips
Car/
Van/
Jeep
2
2
4
21
0

Taxi

PT
(UPSRTC)

PT(Pvt.
Bus)

PT
(Rail)

Auto
Rickshaw

Grand
Total

0
0
0
0

4
3
1
0

6
8
5
0

5
2
0
0

15
47
14
48

100
100
100
100

60

100

28 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Trip
Purpose/
Modeof
travel
Others
GrandTotal

Percentagedistributionoftrips
Cycle 2Wh
29
22

18
33

Car/
Van/
Jeep
7
2

Taxi

PT
(UPSRTC)

PT(Pvt.
Bus)

PT
(Rail)

Auto
Rickshaw

Grand
Total

0
0

4
3

9
7

0
3

33
30

100
100

Table214:PurposewisetripclassificationbasedontriplengthforHHs

Percentagedistributionoftrips
1km. 1to2km. 2to5km. 510km. 1025km. 25100km. >100km. Total
Work
18
15
30
25
6
5
1
100
Education
38
20
23
15
3
2
0
100
Selfbusiness
21
16
39
20
1
2
0
100
Shopping
36
0
36
27
0
0
0
100
SocialandRecreation
0
40
27
33
0
0
0
100
Others(PleaseSpecify)
15
12
43
27
0
3
0
100
Total
29
17
27
19
3
3
0
100

TripPurpose/Distance

2.3 Roadinfrastructure
2.3.1 About
TheMasterPlanfor2021hasclassifiedtheroadsinMeerutintothreecategories:
RegionalRoads:
TheseincludeNH58(DelhiGhaziabadMeerutHaridwarBadrinathManaPass),NH119
(MeerutNajibabadPauri),SH14(GarhMeerutBaghpatSonipat),SH18(Meerut
Badaun),andSH82(MeerutSardhanaKarnal).
Theseroadshaveanobstaclecoursewithinthecityareaduetodevelopmentofresidential
and commercial activities which lead to encroachment and narrowing of RoW because of
parkingandotherreasons.
Duetolackofproperalternativesforintracitymovement,theseregionalroadsfacevarious
kindsofconflictsbetweenlocalandregionaltraffic.
Majorurbanroads/ArterialRoads:
TheseincludetheroadsbetweenGhantagharIndiraChowk,HapurAddaChaurahaLisarhi
Gate, Sharda Marg, Railway Marg, etc. They cater to the intracity traffic and link various

29 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

activities within the city. Commercial areas abut these roads leading to onstreet parking
thatcausestrafficsnarls.
LocalandInternalRoads:
LocalroadsintheinnercoreareasandnewlydevelopedunplannedareasofMeeruthave
verylesswidth.
Theyarealsousedbyalotofslowmovingvehicleswhichaddstothecongestion.

Figure212:ExistingroadnetworkofMeerutcity

From secondary data, it is established that PL Sharma Road, Abu Lane, Lalkurti Road,
BurhanaGateRoad,etc.haveinadequateorencroachedcarriagewaywhichareinsufficient
tosustainthetrafficonit.

30 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

AroadinventorysurveywascarriedoutonallmajorstretchesofroadsinMeerutCity,fora
totalofabout232kms.Basedonthesurveyresults,ananalysishasbeencarriedoutwith
respecttothetypeofcarriageway(upto2lanes,24lanes,46lanes&morethan6lanes),
availabilityofmedian(divided/undividedcarriageway),availabilityoffootpath,andthetotal
ROW.
2.3.2 Typeofcarriageway
Out of the surveyed stretches, it was found that only about one third of the total (68.55
kms) has divided carriageway, while about 70% of the stretches (163 km) has undivided
carriageway,asshowninTable215andFigures213and214.
Table215:Lengthofroadstretcheshavingdivided/undividedcarriageway

TypeofCarriageway

LengthofStretch(inkm)

Percentage

Divided

68.55

29.54%

Undivided

163.5

70.46%

Total

232.05

100.00%

TypeofCarriageway

Divided
30%
Undivided
70%

Figure213:Compositionofroadbycarriagewaytype

31 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure214:RoadStretcheshavingdivided/undividedcarriageway

32 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.3.3 Carriagewaywidth
Outofthesurveyedstretches,itwasfoundthatthemajorityofroadstretchesinthecityare
24 lane (69%), while about 21% roads have less than 2 lanes, while about 10% road
stretcheshaveabout46lanes.ThesehavebeenshowninTable216andFigures215and
216.
Table216:Carriagewaywidthofroadstretches

Carriagewaywidth

Lengthofstretch(inkm)

Percentage

Upto2lanes

48.55

20.92%

24lanes

159.85

68.89%

46lanes

23.65

10.19%

TOTAL

232.05

100%

TypeofCarriageWidth

4 6lanes
10%

upto2
lanes
21%

6 8lanes
0%
2 4lanes
69%

Figure215:Roadclassificationbasedoncarriagewaywidth

33 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure216:Mapshowingroadsaccordingtocarriagewaywidth

34 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.3.4 Availabilityoffootpath
Outofthesurveyedstretches,itwasfoundthatalmost95%oftheroadstretchesdonot
haveanyfootpath.ThisisshowninTable217andFigures217and218.
Table217:Availabilityoffootpathonroadstretches

FootpathAvailability

LengthofStretch(inkm)

Percentage

Nofootpath

218.75

94.3%

13m

5.2

2.2%

35m

8.1

3.5%

TOTAL

232.05

100%

1 3m
2%

AvailabilityofFootpath
3 5m
4%

Nofoothpath
94%
Figure217:Classificationofroadsbasedonavailabilityoffootpaths

35 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure218:Roadstretcheswithfootpathpresent/absent

36 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.3.5 RightofWay(ROW)
Outofthesurveyedstretches,itwasfoundthatthemajorityofroadstretchesinthecity
haveROWlessthan15m(60%),whileonly17%roadshaveROWmorethan20m.Thishas
beenshowninTable218andFigures219and220.
Table218:Roadclassificationbasedonrightofwayavailable

RightofWay(inm)

Lengthofstretch(inkm)

Percentage(%)

Lessthan10

69.1

29.78

1015

68.75

29.63

1520

54.4

23.44

2030

39.8

17.15

TOTAL

232.05

100%

RightofWay(Meters)
20 30m,
17.00%
<10m,30.00%
15 20m,
23.00%
10 15m,
30.00%

Figure219:Roadclassificationbasedonrightofwayavailable

37 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure220:ROWofroadstretches

38 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.4 Outercordontrafficvolume
SecondarydatasuggeststhatDelhi Road,GarhRoadandRoorkeeRoadbringthe mostof
regionaltraffictoMeerutcity.
The traffic volumes observed at the Outer cordon locations over the entire day and their
directionalsplitisgiveninFigures221and222.

Figure222:Trafficvolumecountatvarioussurveylocations

49%
51%

Entry
Exit

Figure221:Directionalsplit oftrafficatoutercordonlocations

39 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Table219:Outercordontrafficvolumes

OCNo.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Entry
Vehicular
PCU
Roorkeeroad
10966
17374
Mawanaroad
10216
14652
Garhroad
12705
14177
Hapurroad
8617
9938
DelhiRoad
11966
16688
Baghpatroad
11900
13479
Badautroad
7464
8305
Sardhanaroad
9626
10899
Parikshitgarhroad
3833
4590
TOTAL
87293
110102
Name

Exit
Vehicular
9724
9756
13113
10266
14284
13040
6871
10692
4103
91849

PCU
16515
12869
13431
13407
18119
18314
6629
11719
5795
116798

Total(Entry+Exit)
Vehicular
PCU
20690
33889
19972
27521
25818
27608
18883
23345
26250
34807
24940
31793
14335
14934
20318
22618
7936
10385
179142
226900

AscanbeseenfromtheTable219,themajortrafficentersthecitythroughtheDelhiroad,
Roorkeeroad,Baghpatroad,andGarhroad.
The nature of traffic volume has been explained below for the all the outer cordon
locations.
2.4.1 Roorkeeroad
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheRoorkeeroadis856vehiclesperhourwith452
vehiclesperhour(53%)movinginMeerutand404vehiclesperhour(47%)movingoutof
Meerut towards Roorkee. The peak hour is from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. in the morning with
1543vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroadasshowninFigure223.

450
Entry
Traffic
(Roorkee
to
Meerut)

400
No.ofVehicles

350
300
250
200

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
to
Roorkee)

150
100
50
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

0
Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure223:TrafficvolumeatRoorkeeroadat15minutesinterval

40 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat93%ofthevehiclesmovingonRoorkeeroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 7% are slow moving as shown in Figure 225. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (56%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute only 13% of the total number of vehicles and goods vehicles constitute the
remaining31%,asshowninFigure226.
Figure224:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Roorkeeroad)

7%

47%
53%

Entry

FastVehicles

Exit

SlowVehicles

93%

Figure225:Vehicularcomposition(Roorkeeroad)

Private
Vehicles

31%

Passenger
Vehicles

31%

Goods
Vehicles

69%

Public
Vehicles
56%

11%
2%

IPTVehicles
GoodsVehicle

2.4.2 Mawanaroad(NH119)
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheMawanaroadis832vehiclesperhourwith424
vehiclesperhour(51%)movinginMeerutand408vehiclesperhour(49%)movingoutof
MeeruttowardsMawana.Thepeakhourisfrom4:45p.m.to5:45p.m.intheeveningwith
1518vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroadasshowninFigure227.

41 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

450
Entry
Traffic
(Mawana
to
Meerut)

400
No.ofVehicles

350
300
250

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
to
Mawana)

200
150
100
50
0
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure226:TrafficvolumeatMawanaroadat15minuteinterval

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat85%ofthevehiclesmovingonMawanaroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 15% are slow moving as shown in Figure 229. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (59%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute29%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstituteonly12%,as
showninFigure230.
Figure227:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Mawanaroad)

15%
Fast
Vehicles

Entry

49%
51%

Slow
Vehicles

Exit

85%

Figure228:Vehicularcomposition(Mawanaroad)

Public
Vehicles

Passenger
Vehicles

25%
IPTVehicles

Goods
Vehicles

59%

88%
4%

Private
Vehicles

12%

12%

Goods
Vehicle

42 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.4.3 Garhroad
The average daily traffic as observed on the Garh road is 832 vehicles per hour with 424
vehiclesperhour(51%)movinginMeerutand408vehiclesperhour(49%)movingoutof
Meerut towards Garhmukteshwar. The peak hour is from 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. in the
eveningwith1518vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure231.

600
Entry
Traffic
(Garhto
Meerut)

No.ofVehicles

500
400
300

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
toGarh)

200
100

8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure229:TrafficvolumeatGarhroadat15minuteinterval

Traffic volume survey data shows that 82% of the vehicles moving on Garh road are fast
moving vehicles, while 18% are slow moving, as shown in Figure 233. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (64%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute22%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstituteonly14%,as
showninFigure234.
Figure230:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Garhroad)

18%

49%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Exit

51%

Slow
Vehicles
82%

43 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure231:Vehicularcomposition(Garhroad)

14%

Private
Vehicles

14%
Passenger
Vehicles

Public
Vehicles

18%

Goods
Vehicles

64%

86%

4%

IPT
Vehicles
Goods
Vehicle

2.4.4 Hapurroad(SH18)
The average daily traffic as observed on the Hapur road (SH18) is 779 vehicles per hour
with356vehiclesperhour(46%)movinginMeerutand424vehiclesperhour(54%)moving
outofMeeruttowardsHapur.Thepeakhourisfrom9a.m.to10a.m.inthemorningwith
1477vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure235.

500
450
Entry
Traffic
(Hapur
to
Meerut)

No.ofVehicles

400
350
300
250

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
to
Hapur)

200
150
100
50
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure232:TrafficvolumeatHapurroadat15minuteinterval

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat85%ofthevehiclesmovingonHapurroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 15% are slow moving, as shown in Figure 237. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (63%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute17%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstitute20%,asshown
inFigure238.

44 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure233:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Hapurroad)

15%
46%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Exit

54%

Slow
Vehicles
85%

Figure234:Vehicularcomposition(Hapurroad)

Goods
Vehicle
20%

19%
Passenger
Vehicles

IPT
Vehicles
14%

Goods
Vehicles
81%

Public
Vehicles
3%

Private
Vehicles
63%

2.4.5 Delhiroad
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheDelhiroadis1104vehiclesperhourwith503
vehiclesperhour(46%)movinginMeerutand601vehiclesperhour(54%)movingoutof
Meerut towards Delhi. The peak hour is from 5:15 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. in the evening with
1104vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure239.

600
Entry
Traffic
(Delhi
to
Meerut)

No.ofVehicles

500
400
300

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
to
Delhi)

200
100

8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Time

Figure235:TrafficvolumeatDelhiroadat15minuteinterval

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

45 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Traffic volume survey data shows that 95% of the vehicles moving on Delhi road are fast
movingvehicles,whileonly5%areslowmoving,asshowninFigure241.Thetrafficmajorly
constitutes of private vehicles (65%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute18%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstitute17%,asshown
inFigure242.
Figure236:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Delhiroad)

5%

46%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Exit

54%

Slow
Vehicles
95%

Figure237:Vehicularcomposition(Delhiroad)

17%

17%
Passenger
Vehicles
Goods
Vehicles

Private
Vehicles

12%

Public
Vehicles

6%

IPT
Vehicles

65%

Goods
Vehicle

83%

2.4.6 Baghpatroad
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheBaghpatroadis1020vehiclesperhourwith491
vehiclesperhour(48%)movinginMeerutand529vehiclesperhour(52%)movingoutof
MeeruttowardsBaghpat.Thepeakhourisfrom8:45a.m.to9:45a.m.inthemorningwith
2045vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure243.

46 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

600
Entry
Traffic
(Baghpat
to
Meerut)

No.ofVehicles

500
400
300

Exit
Traffic
(Meerut
to
Baghpat)

200
100

8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure238:TrafficvolumecountatBaghpatroadat15minuteinterval

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat87%ofthevehiclesmovingonBaghpatroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 13% are slow moving, as shown in Figure 245. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (62%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute21%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstitute17%,asshown
inFigure246.
Figure239:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(BaghpatRoad)

13%

48%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Exit

52%

Slow
Vehicles
87%

Figure240:Vehicularcomposition(Baghpatroad)

17%

Goods
Vehicle
17%

Passenger
Vehicles

IPT
Vehicles
19%

Goods
Vehicles
83%

Public
Vehicles
2%

Private
Vehicles
62%

47 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.4.7 Badautroad
The average daily traffic as observed on Badaut road is 590 vehicles per hour with 308
vehiclesperhour(48%)movinginMeerutand282vehiclesperhour(52%)movingoutof
MeeruttowardsBadaut.Thepeakhourisfrom9.00a.m.to10.00a.m.inthemorningwith
1047vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure247.

300
250
EntryTraffic
(Badautto
Meerut)

200
150

ExitTraffic
(Meerutto
Badaut)

100
50
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

TotalTraffic
Volume
Count

Figure241:TrafficvolumecountatBadautroadat15minuteinterval

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat77%ofthevehiclesmovingonBaduatroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 23% are slow moving, as shown in Figure 249. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (71%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute 21% of the total number of vehicles and goods vehicles constitute only 8%, as
showninFigure250.
Figure242:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Badautroad)

23%
48%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
52%

Slow
Vehicles

Exit

77%

48 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure243:Vehicularcomposition(Badautroad)

8%

8%

Private
Vehicles
18%

Passenger
Vehicles
Goods
Vehicles

Public
Vehicles
IPT
Vehicles

3%
71%

92%

Goods
Vehicle

2.4.8 Sardhanaroad
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheSardhanaroadis836vehiclesperhourwith452
vehiclesperhour(53%)movinginMeerutand404vehiclesperhour(47%)movingoutof
MeeruttowardsSardhana.Thepeakhourisfrom9.00a.m.to10a.m.inthemorningwith
1656vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure251.

500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Entry
Traffic
(Sardhana
toMeerut)
ExitTraffic
(Meerutto
Sardhana)

8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

No.ofVehicles

Total
Traffic
Volume
Count

Time

Figure244:TrafficvolumeatSardhanaroadat15minuteinterval

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat76%ofthevehiclesmovingonSardhanaroadarefast
moving vehicles, while 24% are slow moving, as shown in Figure 253. The traffic majorly
constitutes of private vehicles (61%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute29%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstitute10%,asshown
inFigure254.

49 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure245:Fastvs.Slowvehicle&Directionalsplit(Sardhanaroad)

24%
47%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Slow
Vehicles

Exit

53%

76%

Figure246:Vehicularcomposition(Sardhanaroad)

10%

10%
Passenger
Vehicles

Private
Vehicles
Public
Vehicles

27%

Goods
Vehicles

61%

IPT
Vehicles
Goods
Vehicle

90%
2%

2.4.9 Parikshitgarhroad
TheaveragedailytrafficasobservedontheParikshitgarhroadis328vehiclesperhourwith
158vehiclesperhour(48%)movinginMeerutand170vehiclesperhour(52%)movingout
of Meerut towards Parikshitgarh. The peak hour is from 10.00 a.m. to 11 a.m. in the
morningwith502vehiclesperhourpassingthroughthisroad,asshowninFigure255.

140

No.ofVehicles

120

EntryTraffic
(Parikshitgarh
toMeerut)

100
80
60

ExitTraffic
(Meerutto
Parikshitgarh)

40
20
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30
8.00to8.15
8.45to9.00
9.30to9.45
10.15to10.30
11.00to11.15
11.45to12.00
12.30to12.45
1.15to1.30
2.00to2.15
2.45to3.00
3.30to3.45
4.15to4.30
5.00to5.15
5.45to6.00
6.30to6.45
7.15to7.30

Time

Figure247:TrafficvolumeatParikshitgarhroadat15minuteinterval

TotalTraffic
VolumeCount

50 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Trafficvolumesurveydatashowsthat98%ofthevehiclesmovingonParikshitgarhroadare
fastmovingvehicles,while2%areslowmoving,asshowninFigure257.Thetrafficmajorly
constitutes of private vehicles (46%), public and intermediatepublic transport vehicles
constitute34%ofthetotalnumberofvehiclesandgoodsvehiclesconstitute20%,asshown
inFigure258.
Figure248:Fastvs.Slowvehicles&Directionalsplit(Parikshitgarhroad)

2%

48%

Fast
Vehicles

Entry
Exit

52%

Slow
Vehicles
98%

Figure249:Vehicularcomposition(Parikshitgarhroad)

20%

Private
Vehicles

20%
Passenger
Vehicles

46%

Goods
Vehicles

Public
Vehicles
IPT
Vehicles

25%

Goods
Vehicle

80%
9%

51 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5 Intersectionvolumecount
SecondarydatasuggeststhatBegumpul,OldHapurAddachowk,BaghpatAddachowkare
majorcriticalintersectionsinthecity.
Classifiedtrafficvolumecountwasdoneatthefollowingintersections.Thefollowingpeak
hourPCUsobservedindicatethatthemostcriticaljunctionsinthecityinclude,Begumpul,
HRS chowk, Tehsil chowk and Eves chowk. While Begumpul and HRS chowk tend to be
congested owing to their location intersection of roads leading to major cities such as
Delhi,Hapur,Roorkee,Baghpat,etc.,TehsilchowkandEveschowkappeartobecongested
mainlyonaccountofincitytraffic.
Thepeakhourtrafficvolumesandthedirectionofmaximumtrafficaregivenbelow:
Table220:Trafficvolumesatintersections

Intersection

Peakhourtraffic(inPCUs)

Directionofmaximumflow

Begumpul

6063

TowardsRoorkeeroad

Eveschowk

6120

TowardsNAScollege

Indirachowk

4138

TowardsHapurAdda

HapurAddajunction

11323

TowardsBegumpul

Zeromilejunction

3963

TowardsBegumpul

Lalkurtijunction

696

TowardsBegumpul

BudhanaGatechowk

2798

TowardsBachhapark

Khairnagarchowk

1110

TowardsValleyBazaar

Ghantagharchowk

4626

TowardsKabariBazaar

Stationroadjunction

4990

TowardsBegumpul

HRSchowk

6704

TowardsMeerutcity

Tehsilchowk

6913

TowardsBegumpul

Kaisarganjchowk

5817

TowardsHRSchowk

The traffic flow diagrams for the morning peak hour for all the junctions are given from
Figures259to271.

52 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.1 Begumpuljunction

Figure250:Peakhourtrafficflow:Begumpuljunction

53 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.2 Eveschowk

Figure251:PeakhourtrafficflowEveschowk

54 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.3 Indirachowk

Figure252:Peakhourtrafficflow:Indirachowk

55 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.4 HapurAddajunction

Figure253:PeakhourtrafficflowHapurAddajunction

56 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.5 Zeromilejunction

Figure254:PeakhourtrafficflowZeromilejunction

57 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.6 Lalkurtijunction

Figure255:PeakhourtrafficflowLalkurtijunction

58 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.7 BudhanaGatejunction

Figure256:Peakhourtrafficflow:BudhanaGatejunction

59 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.8 Khairnagarchowk

Figure257:PeakhourtrafficflowKhairnagarchowk

60 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.9 Ghantagharjunction

Figure258:PeakhourtrafficflowGhantagharjunction

61 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.10 Railwayroadjunction

Figure259:PeakhourtrafficflowRailwayroadjunction

62 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.11 HRSchowk

Figure260:PeakhourtrafficflowHRSchowk

63 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.12 Tehsilchowk

Figure261:PeakhourtrafficflowTehsilchowk

64 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.5.13 Kaisarganjchowk

Figure262:PeakhourtrafficflowKaisarganjchowk

65 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

2.6 SpeedandDelay
Basedonthespeedanddelaysurveyconductedonallmajorroadstretcheswithinthecity,
thejourneyspeedsfoundforvariousstretchesareshowninFigure272.
Journeyspeed
3%
21%
28%

010kmph
1020kmph
2030kmph
>30kmph

48%

Figure263:Journeyspeedsobservedforvariousroadstretchesinthecity

Theaveragejourneyspeedinsidethecorecityareawasfoundtobeabout7.2kmphwhileit
washigherintheoutercityareaataround12.8kmphinthepeakhour.
Themapforthejourneyspeedonvariousroadlinksasfoundduringthesurveyisgivenin
Figure273.

66 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReport Annexure

Figure264:AveragejourneyspeedonvariousroadstretchesinMeerutcity

67 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

2.7 Parking
Parkingsurveywascarriedoutat8locationsinMeerut.Theseare:

St.JosephtoHotelNavincrossing

NavinHoteltoBegumpul

BegumpultoGangaPlaza

St.JosephtoBegumpul

HotelNavincrossingtoSt.Joseph

BegumpultoNavinHotel

BegumpultoNavinPlaza

BegumpultoSt.Joseph

The maximum parking demand is on the stretch between Begampul to Ganga Plaza and
betweenSt.JosephtoHotelNavincrossing,asshowninTable221andFigure274.
Table221:Parkingaccumulationatvariousparkinglocations

PeakAccumulation
Vehicular
ECS
116
55
113
61
139
69
90
34
83
37
81
41
105
59
85
54

ParkingLocation
St.JosephtoHotelNavinCrossing

NavinHoteltoBegumpul
BegumpultoGangaPlaza
St.JosephtoBegumpul
HotelNavincrossingtoSt.Joseph
BegumpultoNavinHotel
BegumpultoNavinPlaza
BegumpultoSt.Joseph

AverageAccumulation
Vehicular
ECS
86
42
81
46
95
47
57
23
62
26
58
30
63
32
65
40

Figure265:ParkingdemandatvariouslocationsofMeerut

St.JosephtoHotelNavinCrossing

NaveenHoteltoBegamBridge

70

70

60

60

30

Time

7 7:30pm

6:30 7pm

7:30 8pm

6 6:30pm

5 5:30pm

4:30 5pm

5:30 6pm

3 3:30pm

4 4:30pm

2:30 3pm

3:30 4pm

1 1:30pm

2 2:30pm

1:30 2pm

12:30 1pm

11:30 12am

11 11:30am

0
12 12:30pm

9:30 10am

10

10:30 11am

10

Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

10 10:30am

20

8 8:30am

20

Time

Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

40

9 9:30am

Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

30

50

8:30 9am

40

8 8:30am
8:30 9am
9 9:30am
9:30 10am
10 10:30am
10:30 11am
11 11:30am
11:30 12am
12 12:30pm
12:30 1pm
1 1:30pm
1:30 2pm
2 2:30pm
2:30 3pm
3 3:30pm
3:30 4pm
4 4:30pm
4:30 5pm
5 5:30pm
5:30 6pm
6 6:30pm
6:30 7pm
7 7:30pm
7:30 8pm

ParkingDemand

50

Parking Demand

Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

Time

Table222.Theintersectionswhichrequireattentionare:

Time
7:30 8pm

Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

7 7:30pm

20

6:30 7pm

30
Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

6 6:30pm

40

5:30 6pm

50

5 5:30pm

BegamBridgetoGangaPlaza

4:30 5pm

60

4 4:30pm

Time

3:30 4pm

3 3:30pm

2:30 3pm

10

2 2:30pm

10

1:30 2pm

Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

1 1:30pm

15

12:30 1pm

HotelNaveenCrossingtoSt.Jospeh

12 12:30pm

20
9 9:30am

10:30 11am

7:30 8pm

7 7:30pm

6:30 7pm

6 6:30pm

5:30 6pm

5 5:30pm

4:30 5pm

4 4:30pm

3:30 4pm

3 3:30pm

2:30 3pm

2 2:30pm

1:30 2pm

1 1:30pm

12:30 1pm

12 12:30pm

11:30 12am

11 11:30am

Parking Demand

BegamBridgetoGangaPlaza

11:30 12am

Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

11 11:30am

40
10 10:30am

Time

10:30 11am

45
8:30 9am

0
9:30 10am

10

10 10:30am

25
8 8:30am

7:30 8pm

7 7:30pm

6:30 7pm

6 6:30pm

5:30 6pm

5 5:30pm

4:30 5pm

4 4:30pm

3:30 4pm

3 3:30pm

2:30 3pm

2 2:30pm

1:30 2pm

1 1:30pm

12:30 1pm

ParkingDemand
(E.C.S.)

9:30 10am

30

8 8:30am
8:30 9am
9 9:30am
9:30 10am
10 10:30am
10:30 11am
11 11:30am
11:30 12pm
12 12:30pm
12:30 1pm
1 1:30pm
1:30 2pm
2 2:30pm
2:30 3pm
3 3:30pm
3:30 4pm
4 4:30pm
4:30 5pm
5 5:30pm
5:30 6pm
6 6:30pm
6:30 7pm
7 7:30pm
7:30 8pm

11:30 12am
12 12:30pm

30

9 9:30am

10:30 11am
11 11:30am

40

8:30 9am

9 9:30am
10 10:30am

9:30 10am

ParkingDemand
(Vehicular)

ParkingDemand

50
8:30 9am

8 8:30am

Parking Demand

50

Parking Demand

8 8:30am
8:30 9am
9 9:30am
9:30 10am
10 10:30am
10:30 11am
11 11:30am
11:30 12am
12 12:30pm
12:30 1pm
1 1:30pm
1:30 2pm
2 2:30pm
2:30 3pm
3 3:30pm
3:30 4pm
4 4:30pm
4:30 5pm
5 5:30pm
5:30 6pm
6 6:30pm
6:30 7pm
7 7:30pm
7:30 8pm

ParkingDemand

80

8 8:30am

8 8:30am
8:30 9am
9 9:30am
9:30 10am
10 10:30am
10:30 11am
11 11:30am
11:30 12am
12 12:30pm
12:30 1pm
1 1:30pm
1:30 2pm
2 2:30pm
2:30 3pm
3 3:30pm
3:30 4pm
4 4:30pm
4:30 5pm
5 5:30pm
5:30 6pm
6 6:30pm
6:30 7pm
7 7:30pm
7:30 8pm

Parking Demand

68 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

60

St.JospehtoBegamBridge

70

60
50

40
Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

30

20

20
Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

10

Time

45

BegamBridgetoNaveenHotel

40

35
35

30

25
Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

20

15
Parking
Demand
(E.C.S.)

Time

25

20

15

50

BegamBridgetoSt.Joseph

45

40

35

30

Parking
Demand
(Vehicular)

10
Parking
Demand(E.C.S.)

10
5

2.8 Pedestriancount

Pedestrian count surveys were conducted at 12 major intersections on a typical working

day. The highest pedestrian count was observed on Begampul junction, Baccha park

junction, Hapur Adda chowk, Kaisarganj chowk, Tehsil chowk, Khairnagar junction. The

detailsofpedestrianmovementandPV2valuesacrossvariousintersectionsarepresentedin

69 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Begumpuljunction

HRSchowk

Bachhaparkjunction

HapurAddachowk.
Table222:Pedestriancountatintersections

S.No.

NameofJunction

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BegumpulJunction
Zeromilejunction
Lalkurtijunction
Bachhaparkjunction
Eveschowk
OldHapurAddachowk
Khairnagarjunction
Ghantagharjunction
Railwayroadjunction
HRSchowk
Tehsilchowk
Kaisarganjchowk

PV2
Average
5.1
1.4
0.1
4.4
0.6
4.1
2.3
0.6
1.3
2.3
3.1
4.5

Max
12.7
2.4
0.3
12.6
1.3
10.8
6.8
1.5
2.4
5.9
7.7
8.6

2.9 RailpassengerODforboardingandalightingpassengers
2.9.1 AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingMeerutcityrailwaystation
37%ofthepeopleuseautorickshawtoaccesstheRailwaystation,16%usebus,15%use2
wheelerand14%usecyclerickshaw,asshowninTable223andFigure275.Theaverage
costincurredbyapassengertoreachtherailwaystationisRs.9whileaveragetriplengthto
reachrailwaystationis6km.Whiletheaveragemainlinehaulcostforusingtherailwaysis
Rs.50/person,andtheaveragemainlinehauldistancecoveredis50km.Majorlypeople
areusingrailwaysforundertakingworkrelatedjourneywhichconstitutes60%ofthetotal
numberoftrips,asshowninFigure276.
Table223:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachMeerutcityrailwaystation

Mode
Walk
Cycle
CycleRickshaw
2Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car

Percentage
9.5
4.3
13.8
14.7
37.1
2.6

70 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Mode
Taxi
Bus
Others
Total

Percentage
0.0
16.4
1.7
100

2%
Walk

9%
16%

0%

Cycle

4%

CycleRickshaw

3%
14%

2 Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car

15%
37%

Taxi
Bus
Others

Figure267:CharacteristicofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachMeerutcity
railwaystation

1%
3%
Work
34%

29%

Business
Education
Social&Recreation
Tourism
Others

7%
26%

Figure266:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatMeerutcityrailway
station)

71 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

2.9.2 DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengersusingMeerutcityrailwaystation
30%ofthepeopleusecyclerickshawtodispersefromtheRailwaystation,while29%prefer
walkingtotheirdestinationsand27%peopleuseautorickshaw,asshowninTable224and
Figure277.Theaveragecostincurredbyapassengertodispersefromtherailwaystationis
Rs. 12 while average trip length till which people disperse from railway station is 6 km.
whereastheaveragemainlinehaulcostincurredbyapersoncomingtoMeerutusingthe
railwaysisRs.44/person,andtheaveragemainlinehauldistancecoveredis82km.Majorly
peopleareusingrailwaysforundertakingworkrelatedjourneywhichconstitutes56%ofthe
totalnumberoftrips,asshowninFigure278.
Table224:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromMeerutcityrailwaystation

Mode
Walk
Cycle
CycleRickshaw
2Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi
Bus
Others
Total

Percentage
29.0
1.6
30.6
6.5
27.4
0.0
0.0
3.2
1.6
100.0

Figure268:CharacteristicofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromMeerutcityRailwayStation

2%
0% 0%
3%

Walk
Cycle
29%

CycleRickshaw

27%

2 Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
2%

6%

Taxi
Bus

31%

Others

72 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure269:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatMeerutcityrailwaystation)

0%

11%
Work
32%

21%

Business
Education
Social&Recreation
Tourism
Others

12%
24%

2.10 Bus passenger OD for boarding and alighting passengers at Sohrab


gatebusterminal
2.10.1 AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingSohrabgatebusterminal
37%ofthepeopleuseautorickshawtoaccessShorabGateBusTerminal,while18%use2
wheeler,15%usebus,11%usecyclerickshawand15%preferwalking,asshowninFigure2
25andFigure279.TheaveragecostincurredbyapassengertoreachtheterminalisRs.6/
while average trip length to reach bus stand is 4 km. whereas the average main line haul
costforusingthebusisRs.65/person,andtheaveragemainlinehauldistancecoveredis
102 km. Majorly people are using bus for undertaking work related journey which
constitutes78%ofthetotalnumberoftrips,asshowninFigure280.

Table225:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachSohrabgatebusterminal

Mode
Walk
Cycle
CycleRickshaw
2Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi
Bus
Others
Total

Percentage
15
4
11
18
37
1
0
15
0
100

73 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure270: DistributionofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachSohrabgatebusterminal

0%
1%

Walk

0%

15%

15%

Cycle
4%

CycleRickshaw
2 Wheeler

11%

AutoRickshaw
Car

37%

Taxi
17%

Bus
Others

Figure271: Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatSohrabgatebusterminal)

2%
6%
Work

13%
1%

Business
47%

Education
Social&Recreation
Tourism

31%

Others

2.10.2 DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengerusingSohrabgatebusterminal
34%ofthepeopleuseautorickshawtodispersefromSohrabgatebusterminal,while21%
use cycle rickshaw, 7% people use bus while 17% people walk to their destinations, as
showninTable226andFigure281.Theaveragecostincurredbyapassengertodisperse
from the terminal is Rs. 9 while average trip length till which people disperse is 4 km.
whereastheaveragemainlinehaulcostincurredbyapersoncomingtoMeerutusingthe
busisRs.71/person,andtheaveragemainlinehauldistancecoveredis114km.Majorly
people are using bus for undertaking work related journey which constitutes 69% of the
totalnumberoftrips,asshowninFigure282.

74 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table226:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromSohrabgatebusterminal

Mode
Walk
Cycle
CycleRickshaw
2Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi
Bus
Others
Total

Percentage
17
3
21
16
34
1
0
7
3
100

Figure272:DistributionofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromSohrabgatebusterminal

3%

0%
1%

Walk

7%

16%

Cycle
2%

CycleRickshaw
2 Wheeler
AutoRickshaw

34%

21%

Car
Taxi
Bus

16%

Others

75 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure273:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatSohrabgatebusterminal)

3%
6%
9%

29%

Work
Business
Education

13%

Social&Recreation
Tourism
Others

40%

2.11 Bus passenger OD for boarding and alighting passengers at Bhainsali


busadda
2.11.1 AccesscharacteristicsofpassengersusingBhainsalibusadda
37% of the people useauto rickshaw to access Bhainsali bus adda, 37% use bus,17% use
twowheeler, as shown on Table 227 and Figure 283. The average cost incurred by a
passengertoreachtheterminalisRs.8whileaveragetriplengthtoreachbusterminalis7
km. While the average main line haul cost for using the bus is Rs. 48/ person, and the
average main line haul distance covered is 63 km. Majorly, people are using bus for
undertakingworkrelatedjourneywhichconstitutes73%ofthetotalnumberoftrips.

Table227:ModeusedbypassengerstoreachBhainsalibusadda

Mode
Walk
Cycle
CycleRickshaw
2Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi
Bus
Others
Total

Percentage
4
1
5
17
37
0
0
37
0
100

76 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure274: CharacteristicofboardingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtoreachBhainsalibusadda

0%
4%

1%
Walk

5%

37%

Cycle
16%

CycleRickshaw
2 Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi

0%

Bus

37%

0%

Others

Figure275: Distributionoftripsbypurpose(forboardingpassengersatBhainsalibusadda)

2%

11%
Work
Business

12%

Education
2%

55%

Social&Recreation
Tourism

18%

Others

2.11.2 DispersalcharacteristicsofpassengerusingBhainsalibusadda
41% of the people use auto rickshaw to disperse from Bhainsali bus adda, while 20% use
cyclerickshaw,9%peopleusebuswhile5%peoplewalktotheirdestinations,asshownin
Table228andFigure285.Theaveragecostincurredbyapassengertodispersefromthe
terminal is Rs. 9 while average trip length till which people disperse is 5 km. whereas the
average main line haul cost incurred by a person coming to Meerut using the bus is Rs.
50/person, and the average main line haul distance covered is 66 km. Majorly people are
usingbusforundertakingworkrelatedjourneywhichconstitutes40%ofthetotalnumber
oftrips,asshowninFigure286.

77 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table228:ModeusedbypassengerstodispersefromBhainsalibusadda

Mode

Percentage

Walk

Cycle

CycleRickshaw

20

2Wheeler

15

AutoRickshaw

41

Car

Taxi

Bus

Others

Total

100

Figure276:DistributionofalightingpassengersbymodeoftravelusedtodispersefromBhainsalibusadda

2%
2%
3%

9%

3%

Walk

5%

Cycle
CycleRickshaw
20%

2 Wheeler
AutoRickshaw
Car
Taxi

15%

41%

Bus
Others

Figure277:Distributionoftripsbypurpose(foralightingpassengersatBhainsalibusadda)

21%

22%

Work
Business
Education

11%
18%
14%
14%

Social&Recreation
Tourism
Others

78 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ANNEXUREII:TRAVEL
DEMANDMODEL

79 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ChapterThree: TravelDemandModel
3.1 Introduction
The purpose of travel demand modeling and forecasting is to perform a conditional
predictionoftraveldemandinordertoestimatethelikelytransportationconsequencesof
several transportation alternatives (including the donothing alternative) that are being
consideredforimplementation.Thepredictionisalsoconditionalonapredictedtargetyear
landusepattern.Themajorcomponentsoftravelbehaviourareidentifiedas:

Thedecisiontotravelforagivenpurpose(Tripgeneration)

Thechoiceofdestination(Tripdistribution)

Thechoiceoftravelmode(Modechoice)

Thechoiceofrouteorpath(Networkassignment)

The output of each step becomes inputs to the following step, which also takes relevant
inputsfromthespecificationsofthealternativeplanunderstudy(networkdescription)and
fromthelanduseandsocioeconomicprojectionphase.
To enable future travel demand to be forecast, base year travel demand was simulated
usingaseriesofinterlinkedsubmodels.Thesemodelsarecalibratedwithbaseyeartravel
data and validated by comparing observed and modeled travel demand. The detail
methodologyofthefourstagemodelingisgiveninFigure31.

80 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure31:Fourstagemodelingprocess

81 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

The sequence of activities involved in the calibration of the Gravity model is presented in
Figure32.

Figure32:CalibrationoftheGravitymodel

82 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.2 Tripassignment
Traffic assignment is the stage in the transport planning process wherein the trip
interchangesareallocatedtodifferentpartsofthenetworkformingthetransportsystem.
Inthisstagetheroutetobetravelledisdeterminedandtheinterzonalflowsareassigned
totheselectedroutes.Allassignmenttechniquesarebasedonrouteselection.Thechoice
of the route is made on the basis of number of criteria such as journey time, length, cost
comfort,convenience,andsafety.
The capacity restraint technique using cube software has been adopted. Zone centroids
were connected by dummy links to nearest nodes. These dummy links represent the
approach time to deterrence to reach nearest nodes on a main road or on a sub arterial
road.

Theinputsrequiredare:

OriginDestinationmatrix

Impedancematrix(traveltimematrix/travelcostmatrix/traveldistancematrix)

Network information of all intersections, roads and attributes fields like time,
capacityetc.

Speedflowrelations

Itidentifiesthenetworkdeficiencyby:

V/Cratio:Itclarifiesthecongestionlevelofeachroad.RoadswithhighV/Cratio
(>0.7)aremostlikelytobebottlenecks

Averagetravelspeed(>30kmph):Importantindicesforevaluatingtheentireroad
network

It also provides design hour traffic volumes on highways and turning movements at
junctions.
ThetrafficassignmentsubmodelisshowninFigure33.

83 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure33:Trafficassignmentsubmodel

3.3 Baseyeartravelpattern
The trip matrices have been developed using fresh household survey and roadside
passengerandinterviewsurvey.Theexternaltripsforthecar,twowheeler,autoandpublic
transport were constructed based on the OD survey conducted at the outer cordon. The
tripmatricesthusderivedwerethencomparedwiththepassengertripratesforstudyarea
derivedfromthehouseholdinterviewdata.

3.4 Baseyearmodeldevelopment
Themainpurposeoftheurbantraveldemandmodelistopredictthetravelpatternsand
modalsharesunderdifferentlanduseandtransportscenarios.Traveldemandmodelscan
beusedfortestingdifferentscenarioswithoutactuallyimplementingprojects.Forexample,
one can see the impact of adding a mass transport use like a metro or BRT etc. Similarly
impactontransportationnetworkduetochangesinthelandusepatternscanbeanalyzed.
ThebroadframeworkforthetransportmodelingforthestudyareaisshowninFigure34.

84 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure34:Transportmodelingframework

Severalsoftwareprogramsareavailablefordevelopingtraveldemandmodels.TheLucknow
transport model has been developed using CUBE (a stateoftheart Travel Demand
Modelingsoftware).

3.5 Modelstructure
The model is based on a conventional 4stage transport model
approach.Itincludes:

Trip Generation calculating the number of origins


anddestinationsforeachzone

ModelInput
Roadnetworkinventory
Publictransportationdetails
Planningvariablesbyzones
Tripendinformation

Trip Distribution attaching the origins and


destinationsforcompletetrips

Mode Choice determining the mode for each trip (two wheeler, car, auto,
publictransport)

Assignment assigning passengers to their respective highway and transit


networks

Thehighway(road)networkisbuiltwithallthemajorroadsandsomekeyminorroads.The
transitsystemisbuiltwiththeexistingpublictransportsysteminallitsforms,i.e.busand
minibuseswiththeirroutes,frequency,andfarestructureetc.

85 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.6 Calibration
Tripends(derivedfromtheTripendmodels)will
beusedtobuildbaseyeartripmatricesbymode
using

distribution

functions

from

past

information. Distribution function is adjusted


untilassignedflowscomparewellwithobserved
flows.Thesebaseyeartripmatricesarechecked
for their accuracy by assigning distributed trips
by mode on the road network. The assigned

Figure35:Methodologyfortraveldemandmodeling

trafficacrossthescreenlinesarecomparedwith
theobservedtraffic.Oncethemodeliscalibrated,itcanbeusedtopredictthefuturetravel
patternsunderdifferentlandusetransportscenarios.
Themodelisresponsiveto:

Street congestion, travel costs, availability of competing transport modes


includingotherpublictransportsystemsandthegrowthofthecity.

Generalizedcoststhatincludeoutofpocketcostsi.e.fare,vehicleoperatingcost
etc.andperceivedusercostssuchasvalueoftraveltime,costofwaitingtimefor
transitetc.,

The economic development of the region: A comprehensive data on economic


developmentintheformoflanduseandtransportdevelopmentproposalswill
becollected.

Themodelfocusesonmorningjourneytoworkpeak

ModelOutputs

periodconditions.Peakperiodmodelsprovidemuch
more accurate indications of directional travel
patterns during design conditions than do daily
models. However, the daily traffic forecasts can be

estimatedusingpeaktodayexpansionfactorwhichis
obtainedfromthetrafficsurvey.Fromthesurveysit
was observed that the city morning peak hour is

Trip distribution and Mode


splitequations
Trafficflow
Ridership and Revenue
estimate for various system
options
Identification of suitable
publictransportSystem

during10:30AMto11:30AM.Sothemodelwasbuiltforthisduration.

86 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.7 Planningperiod
Year 2010 is taken as the base year. Demand forecasting on the network and on any
proposedmasstransitsystemisrequiredovera2025yearperiod.Inordertoanalyzethe
traveldemandinthestudyareaandestimatethelikelytrafficpatronageonanyproposed
system,allrelevantdatahavebeencollatedforthebaseyear2010,thehorizonyear2031.

3.8 Modes
Themodesthataremodeledinthestudyincludetwowheeler,car,autorickshawandpublic
transport.Thecommercialvehicleswereconsideredasapreload.

3.9 Software
CUBE5.0hasbeenusedtodeveloptheTravelDemandModel.Itisuserfriendlysoftware
for modeling a wide variety of planning policies and improvements at the urban, regional
and longdistance level. The software provides interactive data input and analysis, GIS
functionalityviaArcGIS,modelbuildinganddocumentation,andscenariodevelopmentand
comparison. Its Application Manager uses a flowchart system for designing, coding,
documentingandrunningthemodel.Thestructureallowstheprofessionalplannertoadd
functions as required without the need to learn a new interface and without the need to
createmultipledatabases.TheflowchartgiveninFigure36illustratesthemodelstructure
inCUBE.

3.10 Studyareazoning
The zoning system adopted should also be in coherence with

Roadlength

:493Km

Noofnodes

:1416

studyarea(MeerutDevelopmentAuthorityarea)comprisedof

Centroids

:144

135internalzonesand9externalzonesoutside,makingatotal

Nooflinks

:547

those adopted by the local planning bodies and those by the


pasttrafficstudiesconductedintheregion.Thezonesystemof

of144zones.ThesezonesareshowninFigure37.

87 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure36:ModelstructureinCUBE

88 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure37:Studyareatrafficanalysiszones(TAZ)

89 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.11 Networkdevelopment
Transportnetworkdevelopedforthemodelcomprisesoftwocomponents:

Highwaynetworkforvehicles

Transit network for public transport system i.e. buses, metro and any new
publictransportationsystem

Eachofthenetworksisdescribedindetailbelow:
3.11.1 Highwaynetwork
The coded highway network for the study area represents the nodes (intersections) and
links between them. Connectivity between the network and zones is provided through
centroid connectors. Based on the network inventory, each link has been assigned
attributes such as number of lanes, divided or undivided carriageway, encroachments,
availabilityoffootpaths,etc.IdentifiedroadnetworkforthecityareaisgiveninFigure38.
3.11.2 Transitnetwork
The transit network represents the connectivity, headways, speeds and accessibility of
transit services. In Meerut, local city buses and shared auto rickshaws ply on the main
corridors.So,Meerutbustransportsystemandsharedautotransportsystemisincludedin
the models transit network. The transit routes are specified as those using the transport
links and having stops/stations at determined locations. The access to the stops/stations
from zone centroids and other nodes is provided either by existing highway links or by
defining exclusive walk links. The distance between the bus stop/stations is assumed
between500mto1000minthepublictransportassignment.Figure39presentsthetransit
network for the study area. Information on the same was collected and coded in to the
system.

90 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure39:Roadnetworkforbaseyear

Figure38:Transitnetworkforbaseyear

91 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.12 Baseyeartravelpattern
Thetripmatriceshavedevelopedusingfreshhouseholdsurveyandroadsideinterview.
The external trips for the car, two wheeler, auto and public transport were constructed
based on the OD survey conducted at the outer cordon. The trip matrices thus derived
were then compared with the passenger trip rates for study area derived from the
household interview data. The results of the travel demand estimation for base year and
triprateanalysisissummarizedinTable31.
Table31:Summaryofbaseyeartraveldemand

Percapitatriprate

0.90

Motorisedtriprate

0.54

S.No.

Mode

NMT(cycle+walk)

65074

65074

TWpassengers

44120

5562

49682

Carpassengers

12216

3802

16018

Autopassengers

33065

3159

36224

8614

5329

13943

163089

17852

115867

Internaltrips Externaltrips

Publictransit
passengers
Total

Totaltrips

3.13 AssignmentandobservedODvalidation
Baseyearmodewisematricesdevelopedwerethenassignedonthenetwork.Theassigned
volume on the network was compared with the observed volume on the screen lines
adopted for the study area. Screen lines running on physical barriers were selected
judiciously.Theselectedscreenlinesare:

Alongthedrain

Classified volume count survey was carried out at the crossing points across these Screen
lines.Thecomparisonofassignedflowswiththetrafficvolumeobservedatthetwoscreen
linesarepresentedinTable32.

92 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Pointvalidationhasbeendonefortheimportantoutercordonlocationsandispresentedin
theTable33.Percentagedifferenceofobservedwiththeassignedarewithinanacceptable
limitof15%.
Table32:ResultsofobservedODvalidationonScreenlines

Inboundtraffic
Modes

%
Observed
Difference
5%
1962
1%
1020
10%
1365

Observed Assigned

Twowheeler
Car
Autorickshaw
Public
transport

1872
922
1672

1789
933
1853

4623

4999

Outboundtraffic

8%

4499

2071
982
1548

%
Difference
5%
4%
12%

5274

15%

Assigned

Table33:BaseyearobservedODvalidationonoutercordonlocations

Northbound
Modes
Twowheeler
Car
Auto
Rickshaw
Public
transport

Southbound

1962
1020

2071
982

%
Difference
5%
4%

1365

1548

316

334

Observed Assigned

908
334

900
314

%
Difference
1%
6%

12%

326

340

4%

5%

239

216

11%

Observed Assigned

Baseyearresults:Thetrafficcharacteristicsofthestudyareaintermsofaveragenetwork
speed, average trip length volume to capacity ratio, vehicle distance travelled, total
passengerhoursetc.isgiveninTable34.
Thevolumetocapacityratioforthemajorroads,averagejourneyspeedandthepassengers
perhourperdirection(allmodes)ispresentedinTable35.

93 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table34:TrafficcharacteristicsBaseyear(2011)

S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.

Trafficcharacteristics
Tripsassigned(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPV(Peakhour)
TripsassignedIPT(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPT(Peakhour)
Averagenetworkspeed

Value
98015
56336(57%)
33065(34%)
8614(9%)
20.8kmph
PV5.89kms
PT7.46kms
112373Passkm
4685Passhrs
218109Vehkm
7933Vehhrs
12.04tons/day

Averagetriplength
Passengerkm(Peakhour)
Passengerhour(Peakhour)
Vehiclekm(Peakhour)
Vehiclehour(Peakhour)
Emission

S.No.

NameoftheRoad

V/CRatio
AverageNetworkSpeed(kmph)
Maximum Average
1.24
0.72
11.58

Baghpatroad

Delhiroad

1.52

0.93

10.16

Hapurroad

1.74

0.88

12.28

Badautroad

0.84

0.66

13.42

JaliKothiroad

1.91

0.92

8.02

Railwaystationroad

1.14

0.63

11.76

Sardhanaroad

1.25

0.66

14.06

RoorkeeRoad

1.61

0.94

10.74

GarhRoad

1.47

0.85

12.99

10

Delhiroadbyepass

0.7

0.48

19.18

11

Parikshitgarhroad

1.12

0.61

13.07

Table35:TrafficcharacteristicsonmajorroadsforBaseyear(2011)

3.14 Tripcalibration
Trip Generation: Trip end models were calibrated by relating the trip produced from and
attractedtothezoneswiththeLanduse.Thebaseyearpopulationandemploymentforthe
studyareaispresentedintheTable36.

94 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table36:Baseyearpopulationandemploymentforstudyarea

Studyarea
MeerutDevelopmentAuthority

(MDA)area

Population

Employment

21,92,151

6,49,425

Thecalibratedtripendmodelsforthepeakhourarepresentedbelow.
Productions:

TP0.032*Population+149.1R2=0.52

Attractions:

TA=0.123*Employment+100.1R2=0.54

Thedesirelinediagramforthebaseyear(2011)isgiveninFigure310.

Figure310: Desirelinediagramforbaseyear(2011)

95 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

3.15 Triplengthdistribution
ThetriplengthdistributionfortheBaseyear(2011)fordifferentmodesisgiveninFigures3
11to314.

Figure311:Triplengthdistributionfortwowheelers

Figure312:Triplengthdistributionforcars

96 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure313:TriplengthdistributionforAutorickshaws

Figure314:Triplengthdistributionforpublictransportsystem

3.16 Combineddistributionmodel
The Trip Distribution and Modal Split phase were carried out jointly using a conventional
doublyconstrainedgravitymodeloftheform:
Tijm=riGiSjAjFijm
whereT=numberofinterzonaltripsbymodem
G=Totalgenerationtripendsbyzone

A=Totalattractiontripendsbyzone
i=GenerationZone

97 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

j=AttractionZone

r,s=balancingfactors(constants)

Fij=deterrencefunctionformodem

Fij=KmecijmCijm
WhereK=ConstantFactor
c=GeneralizedCost

=CalibrationConstantExponentialfunction

=CalibrationConstantPowerfunction
DoubleConstraintsareimposedbyensuringthatand

Tij = Gi And Tij = Ai


Jm

Im

ThecalibratedparametersaregiveninTable37.
Table37:Calibratedmodechoiceparameters

Mode

TwoWheeler

12.5

1.73E13

102.8

Car

1.6

1.73E13

26.8

Auto

11

0.15

40

PublicTransport

355

0.8

180

Theformofthemodelissuchthatexponential(=0)orpower(=0)functionsmaybeused
for the deterrence function. The inclusion of both and represents a gamma function,
sometimescalledaTannerfunction.

3.17 Traveldemandforecast
ThestrategicUrbanTravelDemandModeldevelopedunderthisstudyisusedtopredictthe
travelpatternsandmodalsharesinthehorizonyeari.e.2031underrespectivelanduseand
transportnetworkscenarios.

Trip End models have been used to predict the number of trips generated from and
attractedtoeachofthezonesinthestudyarea.Projectedtripendsalongwiththenetwork
optionsinthefuturewereprovidedasinputstothedistributionandmodalsplitmodelsto
arriveatfuturetripmatricesforcar,twowheeler,autorickshawsandpublictransport.The
methodologyfortraveldemandforecastinthestudyareaispresentedintheFigure315.

n
M
y
a
w
h
ig
H

h
stp
o
C
d
liz
ra
n
e
G

sto
T

u
H
k
a
lP
e
o
M
d
n
E
rip
T

E
lT
e
d
M
n
o
u
strb
D
ip

d
M
ic
o
h
C
e

T
P

u
m
in
M

n
e
G
C

h
a
stP
o
C
d
e
rliz

U
W
,T
R
A
C

O
T
o
M

le

sit
n
ra
T

U
C
P

is)T
-w
e
d
o
(M
t
x
E
rp

n
lsH
a
w
h
ig

y
a
trc
D
isO
-w
e
d
o
M

sitV
n
ra
T
o
C
e

g
n
P
a
sm
rp
T
le
ic
h

D
s
e
tric
a
M

A
m
n
sig
o
N

e
tA
n
s

ts
e
m
n
ig
o
N

trix
a
M
D
O

ita
c
rg
v
n
o
sC
e
Y

y
a
h
ig
sH
w
lo
F

L
k
in
R

tT
n
a
ip
rsh
e
d

98 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Figure315:Methodologyfortraveldemandforecast

3.18 Horizonyearlandusescenario
The projected population and employment for 2016, 2021 and 2031 were used for
estimating trip ends in the corresponding years. The population and employment
projectionsaregiveninTable38andTable39respectively.

Table38:Populationprojectionforthestudyarea

Nameof
studyarea
MDA

Projectedpopulationinthestudyarea
2011

2016

21,92,151 27,07,149

2021

2031

32,22,146 41,05,178

99 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table39:Employmentprojectionforthestudyarea

Projectedemploymentinthestudyarea

Nameofthe

studyarea

2011

2016

2021

2031

MDA

9,67,017

11,92,048

14,14,784

20,84,734

3.19 Futuretransportnetworkscenarios
Information on the transport network improvement proposals was collected from various
agencies responsible for implementation of road projects. The base year network was
updatedwiththesamefordevelopmentofhorizonyearnetwork.
3.19.1 Trafficforecastunderdonothingscenario(2031)
Thesummaryoftheprojectedpeakhourpassengertraveldemandinthestudyareaandthe
correspondingmodalshareisgiveninTable310.
Table310:SummaryofForecastedPeakHourPassengerDemand(2031)

S.No.

Mode

Internal

External

Total

PV

151291

14233

165524

IPT

67941

4802

72743

PT

4742

8100

12842

223974

27135

251109

Total

Thetrafficcharacteristicsofthestudyareaisextractedfromthemodelintermsofaverage
network speed, volume to capacity ratio, vehicle distance travelled, total passenger hours
etc. The same is given in Table 311.The volume to capacity ratio for the major roads,
averagejourneyspeedispresentedinTable312.

Table311:Trafficcharacteristicsofstudyareain2031under"donothing"scenario

S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Trafficcharacteristics
Tripsassigned(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPV(Peakhour)
TripsassignedIPT(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPT(Peakhour)

Value
2,23,974
1,51,291(68%)
67,941(30%)
4,742(2%)

100 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

S.No.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Trafficcharacteristics
Averagenetworkspeed

Value
16kmph
PV6.87kms
PT5.47kms
1,25,751Passkm
4,685Passhrs
6,16,375Vehkm
32,738Vehhrs

Averagetriplength
Passengerkm(Peakhour)
Passengerhour(Peakhour)
Vehiclekm(Peakhour)
Vehiclehour(Peakhour)

S.No.

NameoftheRoad

V/CRatio
AverageNetworkSpeed(kmph)
Maximum Average
2.81
1.72
6.98

Baghpatroad

Delhiroad

3.83

2.23

7.15

Hapurroad

2.55

1.88

8.38

Badautroad

1.73

1.16

9.42

JaliKothiroad

2.29

1.72

6.02

Railwaystationroad

2.26

1.43

7.26

Sardhanaroad

2.85

1.66

8.06

RoorkeeRoad

3.40

2.44

7.74

GarhRoad

2.74

1.85

7.99

10

Delhiroadbyepass

2.71

1.48

9.18

11

Parikshitgarhroad

2.24

1.61

9.07

Table312:Majorroadtrafficforecastsin2031underdonothingscenario

3.20 TrafficforecastunderMobilityPlan
Thesummaryoftheprojectedpeakhourpassengertraveldemandinthestudyareaandthe
correspondingmodalshare,thetrafficcharacteristicsofthestudyareaextractedfromthe
modelforthisscenariointermsofaveragenetworkspeed,volumetocapacityratio,vehicle
distancetravelled,totalpassengerhours,thevolumetocapacityratioforthemajorroads
duringpeakhour,averagejourneyspeedetcispresentedintable313&Table314.

101 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table313:Trafficcharacteristicsofstudyareain2031MobilityPlan

S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.

Trafficcharacteristics
Tripsassigned(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPV(Peakhour)
TripsassignedIPT(Peakhour)
TripsassignedPT(Peakhour)
Averagenetworkspeed

Value
2,23,974
1,16,980(52%)
44,972(20%)
6,20,22(28%)
20.29kmph
PV6.79kms
PT7.28kms
4,75,513Passkm
14,362Passhrs
4,70,034Vehkm
15,663Vehhrs
19.85tons/day

Averagetriplength
Passengerkm(Peakhour)
Passengerhour(Peakhour)
Vehiclekm(Peakhour)
Vehiclehour(Peakhour)
Emissions

S.No.

Nameoftheroad

V/CRatio
AverageNetworkSpeed(kmph)
Maximum Average
0.79
0.50
11.86

Baghpatroad

Delhiroad

0.58

0.34

27.03

Hapurroad

0.82

0.56

18.94

Badautroad

0.71

0.43

19.59

JaliKothiroad

0.83

0.41

13.55

Railwaystationroad

0.66

0.42

16.99

Sardhanaroad

0.63

0.47

12.64

RoorkeeRoad

0.91

0.53

21.05

GarhRoad

1.35

0.49

17.89

10

Delhiroadbyepass

0.72

0.35

14.71

11

Parikshitgarhroad

0.60

0.28

16.17

Table314:Majorroadtrafficforecastsin2031MobilityPlan

3.21 Comparisonoftravelcharacteristicsforvariousscenarios:
ThecomparisonoftravelcharacteristicsforvariousscenariosinpresentedintheTable315.
Table315:Comparisonoftravelcharacteristics

Scenario

Privatevehicleshare(%) IPTShare(%) PTShare(%)

Baseyear

57

34

DoNothing2031

68

30

Withproposedimprovementmeasures

52

20

28

102 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Annexure3Zonewise
Populationprojections

103 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table316:Populationprojectionsforthestudyarea

Zone
No.

Name

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

MunicipalWardNo.1

13815

13815

13815

MunicipalWardNo.2

14924

14924

14924

MunicipalWardNo.3

18964

32325

32325

MunicipalWardNo.4

51300

128250

128250

MunicipalWardNo.5

17550

40500

40500

MunicipalWardNo.6

28566

84640

84640

MunicipalWardNo.7

48330

80550

80550

MunicipalWardNo.8

14947

14947

14947

MunicipalWardNo.9

14850

14850

14850

10

MunicipalWardNo.10

39000

39000

39000

11

MunicipalWardNo.11

32325

103440

103440

12

MunicipalWardNo.12

39450

39450

39450

13

MunicipalWardNo.13

24720

57680

57680

14

MunicipalWardNo.14

25725

88200

88200

15

MunicipalWardNo.15

15286

15286

15286

16

MunicipalWardNo.16

24050

76960

76960

17

MunicipalWardNo.17

30300

30300

30300

18

MunicipalWardNo.18

24115

103350

103350

19

MunicipalWardNo.19

32700

32700

32700

20

MunicipalWardNo.20

20400

25500

25500

21

MunicipalWardNo.21

18500

25900

25900

22

MunicipalWardNo.22

12477

12477

12477

23

MunicipalWardNo.23

15150

15150

15150

24

MunicipalWardNo.24

47400

59250

59250

25

MunicipalWardNo.25

11588

11588

11588

26

MunicipalWardNo.26

18000

60000

60000

27

MunicipalWardNo.27

17570

35140

35140

28

MunicipalWardNo.28

40680

50850

50850

29

MunicipalWardNo.29

12978

12978

12978

30

MunicipalWardNo.30

12638

12638

12638

104 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

Name

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

31

MunicipalWardNo.31

33600

33600

33600

32

MunicipalWardNo.32

12487

12487

12487

33

MunicipalWardNo.33

46920

93840

93840

34

MunicipalWardNo.34

30060

33400

33400

35

MunicipalWardNo.35

15182

15182

15182

36

MunicipalWardNo.36

12096

12096

12096

37

MunicipalWardNo.37

13895

13895

13895

38

MunicipalWardNo.38

12296

12296

12296

39

MunicipalWardNo.39

14080

14080

14080

40

MunicipalWardNo.40

24500

26250

26250

41

MunicipalWardNo.41

28650

28650

28650

42

MunicipalWardNo.42

12642

12642

12642

43

MunicipalWardNo.43

13200

13200

13200

44

MunicipalWardNo.44

14587

14587

14587

45

MunicipalWardNo.45

13050

13050

13050

46

MunicipalWardNo.46

19500

19500

19500

47

MunicipalWardNo.47

12364

12364

12364

48

MunicipalWardNo.48

11998

11998

11998

49

MunicipalWardNo.49

14952

14952

14952

50

MunicipalWardNo.50

15000

15000

15000

51

MunicipalWardNo.51

12254

12254

12254

52

MunicipalWardNo.52

15027

15027

15027

53

MunicipalWardNo.53

13560

13560

13560

54

MunicipalWardNo.54

11741

11741

11741

55

MunicipalWardNo.55

12216

12216

12216

56

MunicipalWardNo.56

13052

13052

13052

57

MunicipalWardNo.57

25050

25050

25050

58

MunicipalWardNo.58

15179

15179

15179

59

MunicipalWardNo.59

13950

13950

13950

60

MunicipalWardNo.60

19950

19950

19950

61

MunicipalWardNo.61

12342

12342

12342

105 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

Name

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

62

MunicipalWardNo.62

12545

12545

12545

63

MunicipalWardNo.63

12109

12109

12109

64

MunicipalWardNo.64

12609

12609

12609

65

MunicipalWardNo.65

15136

15136

15136

66

MunicipalWardNo.66

12328

12328

12328

67

MunicipalWardNo.67

12563

12563

12563

68

MunicipalWardNo.68

14636

14636

14636

69

MunicipalWardNo.69

12415

12415

12415

70

MunicipalWardNo.70

11446

11446

11446

71

MunicipalWardNo.71

17700

17700

17700

72

MunicipalWardNo.72

13050

13050

13050

73

MunicipalWardNo.73

14974

14974

14974

74

MunicipalWardNo.74

14410

14410

14410

75

MunicipalWardNo.75

13433

13433

13433

76

MunicipalWardNo.76

12792

12792

12792

77

MunicipalWardNo.77

12351

12351

12351

78

MunicipalWardNo.78

14958

14958

14958

79

MunicipalWardNo.79

12586

12586

12586

80

MunicipalWardNo.80

11400

11400

11400

121273

158153

206247

KaseruKhera
Macheran
MaqbaraDiggie
MaqbarGhoshiyan
81

PurvaTahirHussain
Raunakpura
Jubligunj
KhannaKiKothi
LalKurti
TondonMohalla

82

PavliKhurd

6420

13924

18157

83

PavliKhas

22566

48942

63821

106 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

84

Baparsa

6948

15069

19650

85

Sivaya

5262

5946

6540

86

Daurala

13617

29533

38511

87

Mataur

32055

69523

90658

88

SamoliSalempur

15216

33001

43034

89

MohammadpurHamak

12912

28004

36518

90

Panwari

4500

9760

12727

91

Ajhauta

6615

14347

18708

92

Behrala

8823

19136

24953

93

Kailota

8235

17861

23290

94

Dhanju

2916

6324

8247

95

DulheraChauhan

6720

14575

19005

MohiuddinpurLalsana

1959

2214

2435

Uldeypur

2338

2642

2906

MaithnaIndersingh

3902

4409

4850

MukhtyarpurNagla

1472

1664

1830

Ulakhapur

1682

1901

2091

Sikhera

4851

5482

6030

Behchola

2433

2749

3024

AmehraAdipur

5316

6007

6608

Rajpura

3832

4331

4764

SalarpurJalalpur

2905

3283

3611

MuzaffarnagarSaini

4852

5483

6032

Bhurpur

1348

1523

1676

IslamabadChhilora

3539

3999

4399

RasulpurAurangabad

8745

9882

10870

KastalaShamshernagar

4044

4570

5027

NaglaShekhu

3109

3513

3864

Gyanpur

2571

2905

3196

Rukanpur

3080

3480

3828

Morna

2094

2366

2602

96

97

98
99
100
101
102
103
104

105
106

Name

107 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

107
108

109

110

111
112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

NaglaShahu

5480

6192

6811

Pachpera

6487

7330

8063

Bhawanpur

2793

3156

3471

JalaluddinMasudpururfGavudi

920

1040

1144

RaliChauhan

3209

3626

3988

Maidpur

839

948

1043

Ladpura

1949

2202

2422

Khawajahpur

1199

1354

1490

Syal

4961

5606

6167

Mubarikpur

3228

3648

4013

Barauda

238

269

295

Manpur

573

647

712

Kinannagar

7898

8924

9817

PachgaonPattiSanwal

1765

1995

2194

DatavaliGesupur

6915

7814

8595

Kamalpur

6218

7026

7729

Ameharasani

719

812

893

BhagwanpurKhalsa

35

39

43

MauKhas

4337

4900

5390

PachgaonPattiAmarSingh

3358

3795

4174

PattiKhedki

568

642

706

HasanpurQadim

4704

5316

5847

MurlipurPhool

3540

4000

4400

AlampurBuzurg

1922

2172

2389

Jalalpur

1426

1611

1772

Jithauli

2612

2951

3246

BhagwanpurChittawan

3495

3949

4344

Sisoli

6341

7165

7882

BadhalaKaithwara

4769

5389

5928

NaglaKaboolpur

3036

3431

3774

NaglaMal

5134

5802

6382

Name

108 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

120

121

122

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

Sameypur

4512

5098

5608

PeepliKhera

7287

8234

9057

Kudhala

2145

2423

2666

Aath

3402

3845

4229

AllipurJijmana

4660

5266

5792

Dhikauli

10

12

Hajipur

1472

1664

1830

Narahara

4956

5600

6160

Bajaut

1958

2212

2434

Gagaul

7842

8861

9748

Jurranpur

1114

1259

1385

Mohd.PurGumi

684

773

850

TatinaSani

1527

1725

1898

Bhagwanpur

80

90

99

Chandsara

2069

2338

2572

7226

8166

8982

Salempur

556

629

692

Ajijpur

649

734

807

Yushufabad

1430

1616

1778

Bijoli

6738

7614

8376

Dhanota

1200

1356

1491

Khandawali

2451

2769

3046

Khanpur

5815

6570

7227

KheraBalrampur

1674

1891

2081

NaglaPatu

1353

1529

1682

Etahara

7964

8999

9899

Solana

3216

3634

3997

Bahadurpur

2874

3247

3572

DaulatpurFakhrabadUrfKayast

4111

4645

5109

Dimoli

2287

2584

2843

Name

RuknuddinpurMisriUrf
123

124

125

126

Phaphun

109 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

Ikla

1317

1488

1637

Uplehra

1706

1928

2121

Bhoorbaral

1264

1428

1571

AzmalpururfChajjuPur

4101

4634

5098

Mohiddinpur

5668

6405

7046

Ghat

5107

23494

112772

Soharka

947

4357

20911

Mehrauli

2965

13640

65472

Aznoli

1071

4927

23650

Kalanjari

4594

5191

5710

Puthri

2400

2711

2983

Mewla

5640

6373

7010

Didholi

1739

1965

2161

AfzalpurPawati

2671

12286

58971

PanchliKhurd

7643

35156

168749

Zamalpur

1311

6031

28948

Bafar

2600

2938

3232

JaniBuzurg

6808

7693

8462

JaniKhurd

9138

10326

11359

KherkiMuzakkipur

898

1015

1117

Kitholi

3629

4101

4511

SisolaBuzurg

4694

5304

5834

SisolaKhurd

2598

2935

3229

Dilwara

847

3898

18710

IdrisPur

2078

9561

45892

Pepla

2672

12291

57768

ShahpurJainpur

3294

15154

71226

Sindhawali

4782

21996

103380

Arnawali

2728

3082

3390

Azampur

1783

2015

2216

PuthKhas

6581

7436

8180

Name

110 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Zone
No.

134

135

2011

2021

2031

Population

Population

Population

Bohala

4861

5492

6042

Sekhpur

1779

2011

2212

GovindpurUrfGhasauli

4191

4735

21782

Jangethi

5463

6174

28398

Janjokhar

4801

5426

24958

ButZeora

2131

2408

11075

Jevri

4457

5037

23168

2192151

3222146

4105178

Name

TOTAL

Table317:Employmentprojectionsforstudyarea

ZoneNo.

Name

MunicipalWardNo.1

4283

4283

4283

MunicipalWardNo.2

5223

5223

5223

MunicipalWardNo.3

4931

8405

8405

MunicipalWardNo.4

12825

32063

32063

MunicipalWardNo.5

5090

11745

11745

MunicipalWardNo.6

8855

29624

29624

MunicipalWardNo.7

11599

19332

19332

MunicipalWardNo.8

5082

5082

5082

MunicipalWardNo.9

4901

4901

4901

10

MunicipalWardNo.10

10140

10140

10140

11

MunicipalWardNo.11

10344

35170

35170

12

MunicipalWardNo.12

11046

11046

11046

13

MunicipalWardNo.13

7416

20765

20765

14

MunicipalWardNo.14

7460

25578

25578

15

MunicipalWardNo.15

5197

5197

5197

16

MunicipalWardNo.16

6494

26936

26936

17

MunicipalWardNo.17

9393

9393

9393

18

MunicipalWardNo.18

7958

34106

34106

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

111 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

Name

19

MunicipalWardNo.19

9483

9483

9483

20

MunicipalWardNo.20

6324

7905

7905

21

MunicipalWardNo.21

6105

8806

8806

22

MunicipalWardNo.22

3618

3618

3618

23

MunicipalWardNo.23

4242

4242

4242

24

MunicipalWardNo.24

13746

17183

17183

25

MunicipalWardNo.25

3592

3592

3592

26

MunicipalWardNo.26

4860

22200

22200

27

MunicipalWardNo.27

5095

12299

12299

28

MunicipalWardNo.28

10170

12713

12713

29

MunicipalWardNo.29

3504

3504

3504

30

MunicipalWardNo.30

3665

3665

3665

31

MunicipalWardNo.31

8400

8400

8400

32

MunicipalWardNo.32

3496

3496

3496

33

MunicipalWardNo.33

10322

33782

33782

34

MunicipalWardNo.34

10521

11356

11356

35

MunicipalWardNo.35

5162

5162

5162

36

MunicipalWardNo.36

3750

3750

3750

37

MunicipalWardNo.37

4446

4446

4446

38

MunicipalWardNo.38

3566

3566

3566

39

MunicipalWardNo.39

4506

4506

4506

40

MunicipalWardNo.40

6125

6563

6563

41

MunicipalWardNo.41

9741

9741

9741

42

MunicipalWardNo.42

4045

4045

4045

43

MunicipalWardNo.43

3828

3828

3828

44

MunicipalWardNo.44

5105

5105

5105

45

MunicipalWardNo.45

3393

3393

3393

46

MunicipalWardNo.46

4875

4875

4875

47

MunicipalWardNo.47

3586

3586

3586

48

MunicipalWardNo.48

3719

3719

3719

49

MunicipalWardNo.49

5084

5084

5084

50

MunicipalWardNo.50

4050

4050

4050

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

112 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

Name

51

MunicipalWardNo.51

3676

3676

3676

52

MunicipalWardNo.52

5410

5410

5410

53

MunicipalWardNo.53

3932

3932

3932

54

MunicipalWardNo.54

3405

3405

3405

55

MunicipalWardNo.55

3909

3909

3909

56

MunicipalWardNo.56

4307

4307

4307

57

MunicipalWardNo.57

6513

6513

6513

58

MunicipalWardNo.58

5009

5009

5009

59

MunicipalWardNo.59

3767

3767

3767

60

MunicipalWardNo.60

5985

5985

5985

61

MunicipalWardNo.61

3826

3826

3826

62

MunicipalWardNo.62

3638

3638

3638

63

MunicipalWardNo.63

3633

3633

3633

64

MunicipalWardNo.64

3657

3657

3657

65

MunicipalWardNo.65

5298

5298

5298

66

MunicipalWardNo.66

4068

4068

4068

67

MunicipalWardNo.67

3895

3895

3895

68

MunicipalWardNo.68

4976

4976

4976

69

MunicipalWardNo.69

3600

3600

3600

70

MunicipalWardNo.70

3319

3319

3319

71

MunicipalWardNo.71

6018

6018

6018

72

MunicipalWardNo.72

3524

3524

3524

73

MunicipalWardNo.73

5241

5241

5241

74

MunicipalWardNo.74

4611

4611

4611

75

MunicipalWardNo.75

4299

4299

4299

76

MunicipalWardNo.76

3966

3966

3966

77

MunicipalWardNo.77

3829

3829

3829

78

MunicipalWardNo.78

5086

5086

5086

79

MunicipalWardNo.79

4028

4028

4028

80

MunicipalWardNo.80

3648

3648

3648

35169

46639

60822

81

KaseruKhera
Macheran

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

113 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

Name

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

MaqbaraDiggie
MaqbarGhoshiyan
PurvaTahirHussain
Raunakpura
Jubligunj
KhannaKiKothi
LalKurti
TondonMohalla
82

PavliKhurd

1990

4417

5629

83

PavliKhas

6995

15525

19785

84

Baparsa

2154

4780

6092

85

Sivaya

1315

1486

1635

86

Daurala

4221

9368

11939

87

Mataur

9937

9369

28104

88

SamoliSalempur

4717

9370

13340

89

MohammadpurHamak

4003

9371

11320

90

Panwari

1395

9372

3945

91

Ajhauta

2051

9373

5800

92

Behrala

2735

9374

7735

93

Kailota

2553

9375

7220

94

Dhanju

904

9376

2557

95

DulheraChauhan

2083

9377

5892

MohiuddinpurLalsana

668

755

830

Uldeypur

764

863

950

MaithnaIndersingh

2010

2271

2498

MukhtyarpurNagla

959

1083

1192

Ulakhapur

420

475

523

Sikhera

1266

1430

1573

Behchola

608

687

756

AmehraAdipur

1324

1496

1645

Rajpura

1015

1147

1262

SalarpurJalalpur

778

879

967

96

97

98
99
100

114 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

Name

101

MuzaffarnagarSaini

1508

1704

1875

Bhurpur

350

396

435

IslamabadChhilora

1011

1142

1256

RasulpurAurangabad

2395

2706

2977

KastalaShamshernagar

1062

1200

1320

NaglaShekhu

858

969

1066

Gyanpur

642

726

798

Rukanpur

1054

1191

1310

Morna

645

728

801

NaglaShahu

1184

1337

1471

Pachpera

1571

1775

1952

Bhawanpur

567

641

705

JalaluddinMasudpururfGavudi

230

260

286

RaliChauhan

898

1015

1117

Maidpur

210

237

261

Ladpura

501

566

622

Khawajahpur

300

339

372

Syal

1240

1402

1542

Mubarikpur

1743

1970

2167

Barauda

50

56

62

Manpur

300

339

373

Kinannagar

2540

2870

3157

PachgaonPattiSanwal

494

558

614

DatavaliGesupur

2296

2595

2854

Kamalpur

1577

1781

1960

Ameharasani

206

233

256

BhagwanpurKhalsa

14

16

17

MauKhas

1331

1504

1654

PachgaonPattiAmarSingh

1004

1134

1248

PattiKhedki

142

160

177

HasanpurQadim

1262

1426

1569

MurlipurPhool

1026

1159

1275

102
103
104

105

106
107
108

109

110

111
112

113

114

115

116

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

115 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

117

118

119

120

121

122

Name
AlampurBuzurg

541

612

673

Jalalpur

482

545

599

Jithauli

734

829

912

BhagwanpurChittawan

969

1095

1205

Sisoli

1836

2075

2282

BadhalaKaithwara

1203

1360

1496

NaglaKaboolpur

1207

1364

1500

NaglaMal

1410

1593

1752

Sameypur

1134

1281

1409

PeepliKhera

2016

2278

2506

Kudhala

536

606

666

Aath

851

961

1057

AllipurJijmana

1356

1533

1686

Dhikauli

Hajipur

337

381

419

Narahara

1813

2049

2254

Bajaut

606

685

754

Gagaul

1877

2121

2333

Jurranpur

420

474

522

Mohd.PurGumi

188

212

233

TatinaSani

654

739

813

Bhagwanpur

71

80

88

Chandsara

985

1113

1225

2256

2549

2804

Salempur

270

305

336

Ajijpur

162

183

202

Yushufabad

358

404

445

Bijoli

2564

2897

3187

Dhanota

318

359

395

Khandawali

733

828

911

Khanpur

1929

2180

2398

RuknuddinpurMisriUrf
123

124

125

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

Phaphun

116 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

Name

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

KheraBalrampur

359

406

447

NaglaPatu

391

441

486

Etahara

1991

2250

2475

Solana

804

908

999

Bahadurpur

952

1075

1183

DaulatpurFakhrabadUrfKayast

1427

1612

1774

Dimoli

969

1095

1205

Ikla

720

813

895

Uplehra

417

472

519

Bhoorbaral

316

357

393

AzmalpururfChajjuPur

1025

1159

1274

Mohiddinpur

1417

1601

1761

Ghat

1681

7732

37113

Soharka

485

2229

10699

Mehrauli

741

3410

16368

Aznoli

268

1232

5912

Kalanjari

1826

2063

2269

Puthri

916

1035

1138

Mewla

1410

1593

1752

Didholi

435

491

540

AfzalpurPawati

764

3514

16867

PanchliKhurd

2448

11262

54057

Zamalpur

328

1508

7237

Bafar

843

952

1048

JaniBuzurg

1600

1808

1988

JaniKhurd

3088

3490

3839

KherkiMuzakkipur

420

474

522

Kitholi

1313

1484

1633

SisolaBuzurg

1417

1601

1761

SisolaKhurd

690

779

857

Dilwara

221

1018

4889

IdrisPur

651

2997

14384

117 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ZoneNo.

133

134

135

Name

2011Workforce 2021Workforce 2031Workforce

Pepla

915

4207

19774

ShahpurJainpur

963

4431

20826

Sindhawali

1299

5978

28094

Arnawali

986

1115

1226

Azampur

622

703

774

PuthKhas

2473

2794

3073

Bohala

1215

1373

1510

Sekhpur

445

503

553

GovindpurUrfGhasauli

1066

1205

5543

Jangethi

1558

1761

8098

Janjokhar

1408

1592

7321

ButZeora

533

602

2769

Jevri

1114

1259

5792

649426

1006602

1252984

TOTAL

118 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Annexure4PublicAwareness
andEducationProgramme

119 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ChapterFour: Public awareness and education


programme
4.1 Introduction
For successful implementation of any transport project in general and public
transport project in particular, it is necessary to promote public awareness and
create a sense of public ownership of the project. It is necessary to evolve an
outreach and education strategy for public transport. The outreach and education
goalsneedtobedefinedattheplanningstageofthepublictransportitselftofocus
theeffortsoftheprojectimplementationteam.Tosecuresupportofthepublicfor
the public transport facilities and obtain acceptance thereof the outreach and
educationgoalsaredefinedasfollows:

Introduce the concept of public transport, its purpose and benefits to the
variousstakeholders

Create profile of public transport as a big impact, incremental step for


achievingthelongtermvisionformobilityinthecity

Enhance understanding that public transport projects positively impact


economichealthandenvironmentalsustainabilityofthecity

Introducetheconceptofpublictransportasanimportantstrategyinmaking
bestuseoftransportationresources

Establishcommunicationchannelsforthepublictoreceiveinformationand
interactwiththeprojectimplementationteam

EducationandOutreachgoalscanbeaddressedbyutilizingthefollowingstrategies:

Create a network of allies and provide platforms for them to actively


participateasdisseminatorsofprojectbenefits

Useproactiveandcreativemediarelationstopromotekeypublictransport
messages,particularlytraveltimesavingsandtripreliabilitymessages.

120 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

4.2 CommunicationMedia
Theselectionofthecommunicationmediaiscriticalinensuringthatthemessageis
deliveredeffectivelytothetargetaudience.Availablemediainclude:
1.

Printnewsletters,newspapers,magazines

2.

Broadcastradio,TV

3.

NewMediainternet,websites

4.

OutofHomehoardings,posters,shortfilms,displaymodels

5.

Directmailflyers,inserts,brochures,letters,factsheets

6.

Eventmarketingspecialevents,workshops/conferences

7.

PublicRelationsmediamanagement,generalawarenessprograme

8.

MobilephoneThroughSMS,tollfreeenquirysystemetc.

The choice of media is predicated on budget, ability to reach target audience, the
desired impact and the message to be communicated. The messages have to be
reiteratedataregularfrequencyforthemtoimpactthetargetaudienceeffectively.
Thedevelopmentofthemessageisalsocriticaltothesuccessofthemarketingplan
and the message has to be well crafted with both written copy and visual
component. The messages should be focused on the benefits of public transport,
shouldbesupportedbyfacts,positiveandconsistent.

4.3 OutlineMarketingPlanforpublictransport
4.3.1 CommunicationObjectives

Createawarenessoftheproject

Improveimageofbusasatransitmode

Buildbrandidentity

Maximizeridership

Disseminateinformationonuserbenefits

Provideinformationonservice(routes,schedules,fares)

121 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

4.3.2 TargetAudience

Segment1Existingpublictransportusers(suchasbususers)

Segment 2 Potential Users two wheeler users, auto rickshaw users, car
users

Segment3LocalCommunity/SpecialInterestGroups/NGOs

Marketing strategies are to be designed to cater the specific needs of each of these
segmentsseparately.

122 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Annexure5PublicPrivate
Partnership(PPP)variants

123 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ChapterFive:

PublicPrivatePartnership

5.1 WhatisPublicPrivatePartnership
PPPisacontractualarrangementbetweenapublicsectorentityandaprivatesectorentity,
wherebytheprivatesectorperformsadepartmentalfunctioninaccordancewithanoutput
basedspecificationforaspecified,significantperiodoftimeinreturnforabenefit,whichis
normally in the form of financial remuneration. It furthermore involves a substantial
transferofallformsofProjectLifecyclerisktotheprivatesector.Thepublicsectorretainsa
significant role in the partnership project, either as the main purchaser of the services
provided,orasthemainenableroftheproject.
WhileservicedeliverythroughaPPPchangesthemeansofdeliveringservices,itdoesnot
change a department's accountability with regard to ensuring that the services are
delivered. The department's focus shifts from managing the inputs to managing the
outcomes,i.e.becomingacontractmanagerratherthanaresourcemanager.

5.2 PPPisdifferentfrompublicprocurementandprivatisation
PPPs must not be confused with privatisation or public procurement. Table 51 highlights
thesignificantdifferencesinthethreetransactions.
Table51:DifferencebetweenPPP,publicprocurementandprivatisation

Definition

Main
Features

PPP

Publicprocurement

Privatisation

PPPsintroduceprivate
sector efficiencies into
publicservicebymeansof
a longterm contractual
arrangement. It secures
all or part of the public
service, so delegated by
private funding and calls
uponprivatesectorknow
how
Contractingauthority
establishes the
specifications of a project
and leaves to the private
sector the responsibility
of proposing the best

Supply by the
private sector of
works, goods or
service as defined by
thepublicauthority

Privatisation means
transferring a public
serviceorfacilitytothe
private sector, usually
withownership,foritto
be managed in
accordancewithmarket
forces and within a
definedframework

Contracting
authority establishes
clearly what is to be
built, how and by
whatmeans.
Invitations
to

Privatisation
authority prepares the
divestmentplan
Involves transfer of
ownership to the
privatesector

124 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

PPP

Publicprocurement

Privatisation

solution, subject to
certainrequirements
Price is one of the
many criteria in the
evaluationofbids.Alotof
emphasis is on the
technical and financial
capability of the bidder,
financial arrangements
proposed,
and
the
reliability of technical
solutionsused
Given
the
long
duration of concession
period,emphasisisonthe
arrangements proposed
fortheoperationalphase.

tenders
are
accompanied by very
detailed
technical
specifications
regarding the type of
work
being
procured.
Price quote is the
single
most
importantcriterionin
the evaluation of
bids.
The procurement
process is shortterm
in nature and does
notinvolvelongterm
occupancy
of
infrastructure assets,
and thus, does not
lay emphasis on the
operational phase of
theproject.

Is
generally
a
complex
transaction
with carefully designed
contracts and a multi
stage
competitive
tenderprocess
Generally,
the
publicsectorwithdraws
from management of
the
entity
on
privatization
Almost all risks are
borne by the private
sector

5.3 WhyPPP?
Public Private Partnership offers many solutions for all stakeholders, as presented in
Table52.
Table52:BenefitsofPPPstostakeholders

Stakeholders

BenefitsofPPP
PPPs allow the public sector to get better valueformoney in the
delivery of the public services. Through closer partnership with the
private sector. efficiency and effectiveness gains can be reaped,

Forthe
publicsector

particularlyfromthefollowingsources:
Private sector innovation. PPP allows Government to tap on to
the privatesector's capacity to innovate. This is the greatest source
of valueformoney gain, and is achieved by Government not
specifyinghowaserviceshouldbedeliveredorhowanassethasto
bedesignedandbuilt.Instead,Governmentwillspellouttheservices
it need, and the desired outcomes/ outputs. The private sector can
then introduce innovative solutions to meet Government's

125 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Stakeholders

BenefitsofPPP
objectives.
Optimal whole lifecycle costing by outsourcing design, build,
maintain,andoperatetothesameprivatecompany(orconsortium).
The company (or consortium) will then be in a good position to
optimize the design for economy in construction, operations and
maintenance. This is not possible under the conventional
government procurement approach where design, construction,
maintenanceandoperationsareundertakenbydifferententities.
Better asset utilization by sharing Government assets/facilities
with thirdparty users. Some government assets/facilities can be
sharedwithotherusers.Forexample,spaceinGovernmentbuildings
can be rented out for suitable alternative uses Sharing Government
facilitieswithotheruserscancontaincostincreasesforGovernment
and thus public services. With PPP, the private player, which has
expertise in managing assets, will help Government determine the
optimalwayofusingandsharingGovernment'sassets/facilitieswith
thirdpartyusers.
Optimal sharing of responsibilities between the public and
private sector. In a PPP project, Government and the private sector
share the responsibilities of delivering a service. The responsibilities
are allocated according to each party's expertise in managing and
adding value to a specific part in the service delivery process. For
example, Government's core competency is in identifying public
needs and Grafting public policies and objectives. Hence, the public
sectorisresponsibleforclearlydefiningtheservicerequirementsand
desired outcomes. The private sector is usually better equipped to
manageconstructionandutilisationofassetsandoperationalissues.
Hence, the private sector is typically responsible for designing,
building and operating assets to deliver the service. By sharing
responsibilitiesoptimally,Governmentandtheprivatesectorcanput
together their financial and human resources and skills expertise to
deliverthepublicserviceinthebestvalueformoneyway.
TherearedistinctbenefitstotheprivatesectorinPPPsaswell,such
as:

PPPsoffermorebusinessopportunitiestotheprivatesector.The
privatesectorwillbeengagedtodeliverafullsuiteofservices(e.g.
private
design, construction, operations and maintenance) which were
sector
traditionallyperformedinhousebypublicagenciesorperformedby
multipleprivatecompanies.

PPPalsoallowstheprivatesectortomovefromjustconstructing
assets according to clearly specified designs, to designing and
deliveringinnovativesolutions.Theprivatesectorhasmoreroomto
innovateandofferefficientsolutionsforpublicservices
Forthecivic UltimatelyPPPsaredesignedtoprovidesuperiorservicetothecivic
Forthe

126 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Stakeholders
society

BenefitsofPPP
society:
PPPs bring together the expertise of the Government and the
private sector to meet the needs of the public effectively and
efficiently. When structured appropriately, PPPs will deliver public
services that can better meet the needs of the public without
compromisingpublicpolicygoalsandneeds.
Governmentwillalsoensurethatpublicinterestisprotectedinall
PPP projects and that service delivery willmeet public needs at the
best valueformoney when the private sector is brought in to
providegovernmentservices.

5.4 FormsofPPP
TherearenotanypredefinedPPPmodels.PPPscanbestructuredinavarietyofmannerto
effectively support the Government in delivery of public services. Table 53 provides a
selectiverangeofPPPoptionsthatcouldbedeveloped.
Table53:ExamplesofPPPs

Increasingroleoftheprivatesector

Private party Infrastructure Infrastructure


role

servicesonly and

Infrastructure

ancillary partial

services

public

and

privateto service delivery to

publicservicedelivery users

Government All publicto Delivery of core Delivery


role

and Infrastructure

of

core Nooperationalrole

publicservices

publicservices

Public

Noncore

Community facilities Roads,

buildings

hospital services, linked to educational facilities,carparks

services
Example

rail,

port

nonjudicialcourt facilities (e.g. after


services

hoursusage)

Source: Partnership Victoria's Practioner's Guide

5.5 TypesofPPPVariant

DesignBuild (DB): Under this model, the government contracts with a private
partnertodesignandbuildafacilityinaccordancewiththerequirementssetbythe
government. After completing the facility, the government assumes responsibility

127 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

for operating and maintaining the facility. This method of procurement is also
referredtoasBuildTransfer(BT).

DesignBuildMaintain(DBM):ThismodelissimilartoDesignBuildexceptthatthe
privatesectoralsomaintainsthefacility.Thepublicsectorretainsresponsibilityfor
operations.

DesignBuildOperate(DBO):Underthismodel,theprivatesectordesignsandbuilds
afacility.Oncethefacilityiscompleted,thetitleforthenewfacilityistransferredto
thepublicsector,whiletheprivatesectoroperatesthefacilityforaspecifiedperiod.
ThisprocurementmodelisalsoreferredtoasBuildTransferOperate(BTO).

DesignBuildOperateMaintain (DBOM): This model combines the responsibilities


ofdesignbuildprocurementswiththeoperationsandmaintenanceofafacilityfora
specifiedperiodbyaprivatesectorpartner.Attheendofthatperiod,theoperation
ofthefacilityistransferredbacktothepublicsector.Thismethodofprocurementis
alsoreferredtoasBuildOperateTransfer(BOT).

BuildOwnOperateTransfer (BOOT): The government grants a franchise to a


privatepartnertofinance,design,buildandoperateafacilityforaspecificperiodof
time.Ownershipofthefacilityistransferredbacktothepublicsectorattheendof
thatperiod.

BuildOwnOperate (BOO): The government grants the right to finance, design,


build,operateandmaintainaprojecttoaprivateentity,whichretainsownershipof
the project. The private entity is not required to transfer the facility back to the
government.

DesignBuildFinanceOperate/Maintain (DBFO, DBFM or DBFO/M): Under this


model,theprivatesectordesigns,builds,finances,operatesand/ormaintainsanew
facility under a longterm lease. At the end of the lease term, the facility is
transferred to the public sector. In some countries, DBFO/M covers both BOO and
BOOT.
PPPs can also be used for existing services and facilities in addition to new ones.
Someofthesemodelsaredescribedbelow.

128 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

ServiceContract:Thegovernmentcontractswithaprivateentitytoprovideservices
thegovernmentpreviouslyperformed.

Management Contract: A management contract differs from a service contract in


thattheprivateentityisresponsibleforallaspectsofoperationsandmaintenanceof
thefacilityundercontract.

Lease:Thegovernmentgrantsaprivateentityaleaseholdinterestinanasset.The
privatepartneroperatesandmaintainstheassetinaccordancewiththetermsofthe
lease.

Concession: The government grants a privateentity theexclusive rights to provide


operate and maintain an asset over a long period of time in accordance with
performance requirements set forth by the government. The public sector retains
ownership of the original asset, while the private operator retains ownership over
anyimprovementsmadeduringtheconcessionperiod.

Divestiture: The government transfers an asset, either in part or in full, to the


private sector. Generally, the government will include certain conditions with the
saleoftheassettoensurethatimprovementsaremadeandcitizenscontinuetobe
served.

5.6 TypicalcontractualstructuresinPPP
Various contractual structures of PPPs exist and the choice of contract depends on the
objective of the Government such as improving service efficiency, transferring investment
risk, maintaining service control or improving quality of service. Table 54 presents the
typicalcontractualformsofPPPandtheiruniquecharacteristics.

129 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table54:ContractualstructuresofPPPs

Characteristics

Natureof
contract

Asset

O&M

Capital

(Duration)

ownership

Investment

Risk

Public

(13years)

Public&
Private

Public

Public

Contract

type
ofservice.Feepaidby
governmentservice
Managetheoperationofa

Manageme
nt

tocontractor

Commercial

Adefinitive,oftentechnical

Service
Contract

Natureofservice&Payment

governmentservice.Feepaid
Public

Private

Public

Public

bygovernmentforservice
andaperformancebased

(38years)

incentive
Manage,operate,repair&
maintainamunicipalservice
tospecifiedstandards&
outputs.Allrevenues,feesor

Lease
(815

Public

Private

Public

Shared

years)

charges
fromconsumersforprovision
ofservice;theservice
providerpaysthe
governmentrentforthe
facility
Manage,operate,repair,
maintainandinvestinpublic
serviceinfrastructureto

Concession
(1530
years)

Public

Private

Private

Private

specifiedstandardsand
outputs.Allrevenuesfrom
consumersfortheprovision
oftheservice;theservice
providerpaysaconcession

130 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Characteristics

Natureof
contract

Asset

O&M

Capital

(Duration)

ownership

Investment

Risk

Natureofservice&Payment
Commercial

tocontractor
feetotheGovernmentand
mayassumeexistingdebt
Construct&operate,to
specifiedstandards&

BOT/BOO
(1525
years)

Private&
Public

outputs,thefacilities
Private

Private

Private

necessarytoprovidethe
service.TheGovernment
mostlypaystheservice
provideronaunitbasis

Source: The World Bank Tool Kit. Guidelines for PPP

WhileservicedeliverythroughaPPPchangesthemeansofdeliveringservices,itdoesnot
change a department's accountability for ensuring that the services are delivered. The
department'sfocusshiftsfromprovidingtheservicetomanagingtheserviceprovider,i.e.
becomingacontractmanagerratherthanaresourcemanager.

5.7 PPPinUrbanTransport
AccordingtotheNationalUrbanTransportPolicy,Thereareseveralactivitiesinwhichthe
privatesectorcanbebeneficiallyengaged,therebysavingfinancialresourcesforactivities
that only public agencies can best perform. The need therefore is to encourage
involvementofprivatesectorinprovidingurbantransportinfrastructureandservicesunder
wellstructuredPublicPrivatePartnership(PPP)contracts.

131 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Annexure6Listofbusstops
forinstallingbussignage

132 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Table55:Listofbusstopsforinstallingbussignage

S.No.

Nameofbusstop

1.

MedicalCollege

2.

Tejgarhi

3.

NaiSarak

4.

SohrabgateBusDepot

5.

OldHapurAddaChowk

6.

IndiraChowk

7.

EvsChowk

8.

BachhaPark

9.

GIC

10.

Begumpul

11.

PVSMall

12.

KBlock

13.

CommissioneryChowk

14.

LBlockTiraha

15.

BhainsaliBusStand

16.

MehtabCinema

17.

Ghantaghar

18.

MetroPlaza

19.

CityRlyStn

20.

CentralExciseComplex

21.

CCSUniversity

22.

JailChungi

23.

GolMarket

24.

RGCollege

133 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

51:SchematicdesignforBusstopsignage

134 ComprehensiveMobilityPlanforMeerut DraftFinalReportAnnexure

Annexure7SurveyFormats

5thFloorAWing,IFCITower
NehruPlace

Você também pode gostar