Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
FEB 25 1997
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
No. 96-6207
(D.C. No. CR-96-6-M)
(W.D. Okla.)
Defendant-Appellant.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously to grant the parties request for a decision on the briefs without oral
argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
at 1078; United States v. Browning, 61 F.3d 752, 754 (10th Cir. 1995). We
review the district courts application of the Guidelines de novo. See McKneely,
69 F.3d at 1078.
We have reviewed the record and find no error. The evidence was clearly
sufficient to support the district courts finding that defendant possessed the PCP
in the same course of conduct as the offense of conviction. The district court
therefore did not err in including the PCP as relevant conduct in its calculation of
defendants offense level.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of
Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.
Bobby R. Baldock
Circuit Judge
-4-