Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Layout
Introduction
Polyamidoamines
Characterization
Wood
Paper
WOOD
Major
components
90-95%
Polysaccharides
60-70%
Cellulose
40-50%
Wood
constituents
Minor
components
5-10%
Lignin
20-35%
Organic
2-4%
Inorganic
0.2-0.6%
Hemicellulose
15-35%
Hemicellulose
Cellulose
Lignin
Wood cells
Cell wall
Fibrils
Polymerics chains
Paracrystalline region
Cellulose
Hemicellulose
Lignine
lignine-hemicellulose
cellulose-hemicellulose
lignine-hemicellulose covalent bonds
H-bonds
H-bonds
Wood fossilization
Protection against
fungi and insects
ionic interactions
WOOD
coordinative interactions
X-rays maps
SEM image
Si map
Cu map
Palanti S, Predieri G, Vignali F, Feci E, Casoli A, Conti E (2011). Wood Sci Technol.
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-010-0396.
Recent developments
Poly(amidoamine)s: Past, Present, and Perspectives
by Paolo Ferruti, UniMi
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2013, 51, 23192353
.PAAs are per se highly functional polymers and, in addition, can be further
functionalized giving rise to an endless variety of polymeric structures meeting the
requisites for applications in such apparently disparate fields as inorganic water
pollutants scavengers, sensors, drug and protein intracellular carriers, transfection
promoters, peptidomimetic antiviral and antimalarial agents
POSS cage
Polyhedral
Oligomeric
SilSesquioxanes
AAETA
Monitoring the
AA and PAA
syntheses by
Raman
Spectroscopy
NMR characterization
EtOH
61, E
215, EM
H2O
Set of Samples
Ib_1 (30 min)
Ib_0.5 (30 min)
W anhydrous %
Treatment
PAA 1M (1:1)
by immersion (30 min)
PAA 0,5 M (1:1)
by immersion (30 min)
35,25%
conc.
16,64%
6,20%
3,19%
40,94%
19,56%
9,87%
4,87%
time
3,86%
3,84%
time
7,50%
6,45%
Set of Samples
Treatment
W anhydrous %
Br7_ MEA_0.3
8,36%
by brush
I7_MEA_0.3
23,81%
6,90%
13,23%
1,47%
time
2,15%
1,36%
6,05%
5,58%
5,18%
11.25
9.
6.75
post
pH
pre
4.5
2.25
0.
b 60 min
AGAR+PAA
On filter paper
(60 min
30 min)
b 30 min 1b7 30 min 2b7 45min 3b7 60 min Ib 30 min Ib7 30 min n 60 min
AGAR+PAA
On XVIII century
paper
(30 min
45 min
60 min)
IMMERSION IN PAA
filter paper
(30 min)
n 30 min
In 30 min
IMMERSION IN PAA
XVIII paper
(30 min)
Chromatic changes
Whatman filter paper
2.50
Samples
E
1.88
b
L
1.25
b 60 min
b 30 min
n 60 min
n 30 min
Ib
In
0.63
a
0.00
-0.63
Gel b 30
min
Gel b 60
min
Ib
Gel n 30
min
Gel n 60
min
In
0,41
-0,11
1,13
1,70
0,84
-0,28
0,96
1,84
0,44
-0,02
0,65
0,87
0,56
0,02
0,60
0,92
0,85
0,01
0,62
1,23
0,83
-0,12
0,10
0,85
16.88
11.25
yellowing decrease
L
5.63
0.00
-5.63
b7
n7
Ib7
In7
Samples
b7
Ib7
n7
In7
L
1,63
1,71
1,81
1,83
a
0,38
0,43
0,23
0,43
b
-1,77
-3,00
-1,86
-3,86
L = lightness
a = red/green color opponent
b = yellow/blue color opponent
E = total color difference
E
4,91
10,87
5,33
16,93
XVIII century paper treated by immersion in PAA 0.15M before and after aging
paper blank
MMFF calculations
Spore germination
160.
120.
80.
40.
0.
B
Cu2+ ions
coordination and
dispersion of Ag
NP in SiPAA
50
Counts
40
30
20
10
0
5
10
15
20
Diameter (nm)
25
UNI EN 113
Evaluation of preservative effectiveness
Coniophora puteana
Trametes versicolor
Poria placenta
Cu-SiPAA
AgNP-SiPAA
UNI EN 113
Evaluation of preservative effectiveness
NO-CHOICE TEST
Control
Reticulitermes lucifugus
SiPAA (A)
SiPAAOH
Treated Sample Weight Loss Visual Rating Mortality
SiPAA (A)
0.3%
1
74%
SiPAAOH (S)
0.2%
1
73%
PAAOH (P)
0.03%
0.5
75%
Control (E)
7%
4
48%
PAAOH (P)
Kalotermes flavicollis
Control (E)
SiPAAOH (S)
SiPAA (A)
PAAOH (P)
CONCLUSIONS
insoluble fraction
insoluble but not too much !