Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Contact Centers
Mobility
Services
WHITE
PAPER
avaya.com
Table of Contents
Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1
Historical Perspective ........................................................................................................ 1
Approach............................................................................................................................. 2
Results ................................................................................................................................. 3
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 5
Learn More .......................................................................................................................... 5
avaya.com
Overview
Multi-protocol Label Switching1 (MPLS) has often been presented as a technology that will help service
providers deliver better performance and availability, including specific benefits for demanding applications
such as voice and video. In recent years, many service providers have implemented MPLS technology in
their core networks. Now, with MPLS backbones in place, these carriers are offering MPLS-based services
to enterprise customers in support of voice over IP (VoIP) and video applications. The carriers are also
aggressively advertising the benefits of MPLS, claiming large improvements in performance and availability
when compared with using the public Internet.
In view of all this activity, in the summer of 2004 Avaya undertook a project to measure the end-to-end
application quality of these new MPLS services. With the help of one of its enterprise customers in the
financial services market, Avaya measured the ability of MPLS to support VoIP. The results presented in this
paper show that the availability and call quality of VoIP over MPLS is comparable to that of VoIP over the
public Internet.
Historical Perspective
MPLS technology is the natural successor to IP over Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) technology, whose
success in the 1990s proved two points very clearly:
1. IP had become ubiquitous; the vast majority of customers demanded only IP services, and service providers
were happy to oblige them.
2. Managing traffic across a carriers network had become a challenge, especially considering the exponential
growth in traffic experienced during the late 1990s.
The flexibility of label switching provided by ATM helped significantly for provisioning and traffic engineering,
while cell-based forwarding allowed for faster processing and larger bandwidth in the core. In addition to
these benefits, however, IP over ATM presented numerous disadvantages.
While small fixed cells helped speed up forwarding, they imposed at least 20% overhead. Also, as traffic
load increased to the gigabit range, the overhead of fragmentation and re-assembly became a limiting factor,
since it had become more efficient to forward larger IP packets. Another disadvantage of implementing
IP over ATM was the burden of managing the complex interface between IP and ATM. Consequently, the
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) took note of these challenges and formed the MPLS working group to
standardize label switching for IP.
Unlike ATM, MPLS was required to work independently of the underlying Layer 2 technology, hence its name.
MPLS was also required to be compatible with the Integrated Services framework, and be able to utilize the
RSVP signaling protocol. In short, MPLS was designed to give carriers the traffic engineering capabilities they
expected along with the quality of service and fast reroute mechanisms intended to support more demanding
applications like VoIP.
Working with a number of its enterprise customers, Avaya had previously measured the availability and
performance of Internet links with shared private WAN links, such as Frame Relay and ATM, and had found
them to be comparable. In this white paper, Avaya presents similar data for MPLS services. The goal is to
determine whether the adoption of MPLS has improved the performance and availability of VoIP over the
shared private WAN infrastructure.
COMMUNICATIONS
AT THE HEART OF BUSINESS
Approach
Avaya worked with one of its enterprise customers to measure the availability of MPLS services in the support
of voice communication. The customer uses Avaya Converged Network Analyzer (CNA) to optimize voice
communication across the WAN that links its headquarters and numerous branch offices.
CNA Server
Internet
Voice gateway
Branch Site 2
CNA Server
Voice gateway
MPLS WAN
Branch Site 1
Voice gateway
CNA Server
Branch Site 3
As shown in Figure 1, Avaya CNA was deployed at three of the customers branch offices. These three offices are
linked to parallel network fabrics by MPLS and Internet links at T1 speeds.
Through its monitoring and assessing mechanisms, Avaya CNA evaluated the quality of voice communication
between Branch Site 1 and Branch Site 2 and between Branch Site 1 and Branch Site 3 for a period of three
weeks in June, 2004. The assessment was done using Avaya CNA configured to use its Voice Application Model.
Availability
Application Outage
Application Performance
Application Delay/Loss
Protocol Model
Raw Latency/Loss/Jitter
Figure 2: Application Model Structure
Avaya CNA Application Models follow a five-stage methodology, shown in Figure 2. From the bottom, the five
steps include:
1. The measurement of low-level network quantities such as latency, loss, and jitter for each available path
between locations.
avaya.com
2. The computation of transport delay from the raw scores, or the impact on applications in general, not
taking specific application sensitivities into consideration.
3. The computation of application delay, specifically the mouth-to-ear delay that affects VoIP. Note that
high jitter would result in high application delay; similarly, sustained loss results in lost speech and
unintelligibility, leading to increased application delay.
4. The determination of an application quality metric, using a ranking from zero to five stars, similar to movie
ratings. For VoIP, this step effectively equates to a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) calculation for the network:
the larger the jitter or the greater the sustained loss, the lower the MOS rating.
5. Finally, the time periods where the voice quality is determined to be unacceptable are logged as bad
minutes for that path.
Using this methodology, Avaya kept a cumulative count of all bad minutes observed on the various MPLS
and Internet path choices between the sites in question. Avaya then computed for each choice the ratio of the
cumulative bad minutes to the total minutes in the assessment period, resulting in availability values for the
various choices.
Results
The table below shows the availability for all path choices from Branch Site 1 to Branch Site 2 and Branch
Site 3. The table also shows the number of bad minutes for each measured path, normalized to 30 days.
Availability (%)
Configuration
Branch Site 2
Branch Site 3
Branch Site 2
Branch Site 3
320
69
99.2
99.8
MPLS Premium
321
65
99.2
99.8
Internet
90
596
99.8
98.6
The number of bad minutes from Branch Site 1 to the other two locations is also plotted in Figure 3.
COMMUNICATIONS
AT THE HEART OF BUSINESS
avaya.com
Here is an excerpt:
Daily Jitter is measured between PEs within the network. Jitter is calculated by sending a continuous packet
stream of data between a sending server in each of the hubs to a receiving server in each hub. Any difference
of time between consecutive packets is subtracted out and is used as the calculation for jitter between each
of the consecutive packets of data. The mean average of jitter of all packets within a one second interval will
be calculated and stored. The standard Deviation plus the average of a rolling five minute sample of the stored
one second values will be used as the measure for jitter.
In the event that the MPLS Premium service provider misses its jitter target in any given calendar month,
Customer will be eligible to receive a credit equal to one day of its monthly recurring Video and Voice Grade
IP service fee(s) for the month in which the target is not met. In order to be eligible for the packet delivery
credit, Customer must notify the MPLS Premium service provider within five (5) business days.
The following observations should be noted:
This SLA is measured between hubs within the MPLS service providers network and thus doesnt take into
account the full end-to-end path. The enterprise, on the other hand, doesnt send traffic just within the
providers core network and cares instead about the quality of calls from end to end.
The SLA methodology uses time frames of seconds and minutes, far too coarse for providing guarantees
that are meaningful for voice communication.
Conclusion
Avaya measured the ability of MPLS services to support business quality VoIP communications. Avaya found
that the performance and availability of both the MPLS Best Effort and MPLS Premium services are not better
than that of default Internet connections. In addition, Avaya found that:
MPLS Premium service is not always better than MPLS Best Effort service.
The SLA guarantees for MPLS Premium service capture neither the stringent requirements of voice
communication nor the business needs of the enterprise.
These results suggest that an MPLS service is not the panacea for VoIP. MPLS service is in fact essentially
comparable to Internet service. Both provide good base connectivity, but by themselves neither can deliver the
quality and availability required for business-quality voice communication.
To discover how Avaya can reduce the impact of bad minutes on VoIP communication over both MPLS
and Internet links, please refer to the Avaya white paper titled Performance of Virtualized MPLS Internet
Infrastructure in Delivering VoIP Services.
Learn More
For more information on how Avaya can take your enterprise from where it is to where it needs to be, contact
your Avaya Client Executive or Authorized Avaya BusinessPartner, or visit us at www.avaya.com
1
Avaya, a leading global provider of business communications software, systems and services, has acquired RouteScience, a developer of Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) for enterprises and service providers.
About Avaya
Avaya enables businesses to achieve superior
results by designing, building and managing their
communications infrastructure and solutions. For
over one million businesses worldwide, including
more than 90 percent of the FORTUNE 500, Avayas
embedded solutions help businesses enhance
value, improve productivity and create competitive
advantage by allowing people to be more productive
and create more intelligent processes that satisfy
customers.
COMMUNICATIONS
AT THE HEART OF BUSINESS
avaya.com