Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2007
Vol.17
No.2
1
School of Mathematical and Geospatial Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221008, China
Abstract: More effective environmental pollution control and management are needed due to the increasing environmental impacts from a range of human activities and the growing public demands for a better living environment. Urban
air pollution is a serious environmental issue that poses adverse impacts on the health of people and the environment in
most metropolitan areas. In this paper, we propose a geoinformatics augmented framework of environmental modelling
and information sharing for supporting effective urban air pollution control and management. This framework is outlined in terms of its key components and processes including: 1) an integrated, adaptive network of sensors for environmental monitoring; 2) a set of distributed, interoperable databases for data management; 3) a set of intelligent, robust
algorithms and models for environmental modelling; 4) a set of flexible, efficient user interfaces for data access and information sharing; and 5) a reliable, high capacity, high performance computing and communication infrastructure for
integrating and supporting other framework components and processes.
Key words: environmental modelling; information sharing; urban air pollution; geoinformatics
CLC number: X 51
Introduction
LIU Gang-jun et al
Fig. 1
173
Fig. 2
174
In this paper, we argue for a geoinfomatics augmented environmental modelling and information
sharing framework to support urban air pollution control and management.
Proposed Framework
The proposed geoinfomatics augmented environmental modelling and information sharing framework
focuses on urban air pollution problems and consists
No.2
(a) Structure
Fig. 3
Vol.17
(b) Processes
Environmental monitoring
LIU Gang-jun et al
Fig. 4
2.2
175
Data management
176
Fig. 5
2.3
Environmental modelling
Vol.17
No.2
quantify the effect of different sources on specific locations in the urban area by establishing a cause and
effect chain between the emissions from a number of
sources and the ambient concentration at given locations. This involves a good knowledge of the source
strength, an adequate definition of the meteorological
parameters, a reliable method for the calculation of
pollutant dispersion according to the source strength
and the meteorological parameters and an adequate
knowledge of the pollutant losses (or formation) by inair chemical or photochemical reactions. If no assumptions are made about emissions and only ambient
concentration is monitored at a number of receptor
sites, the generally descriptive receptor-oriented models may be used to draw statistical or other inferences,
which may or may not be linked to meteorological
information. With assumed meteorological parameters,
concentration values are often given as a function of
geographic coordinates of the plume and volumeelement models. In this case, the results from the
models are only as good as the input data.
Meteorological parameters, such as wind parameters (direction, velocity and turbulence) and thermal
properties (stability), have an overwhelming influence
on the behaviour of pollutants in the urban air; all the
dynamic and thermal properties associated with the
wind (known as wind field) are presumed to be the
causal link between source and receptor [18]. But expected air pollution situations can only be established
with emission data from all significant sources, including emission conditions and with sufficient information on spatial and temporal variation. In addition, measured concentrations for relevant averaging
times (hourly, daily, and seasonal) with information
on site classification and meteorological and topographical data relevant to dispersion of the emissions
also need to be determined.
Many algorithms and models have been developed
for urban air pollution modelling [11,14,19]. Typical examples of models include statistical, inter-site and
inter-domain validation process models, the reactiondiffusion-advection equations relating to air pollution
formation, transport and deposition, a 3D chemistrytransport model for forecasting the air pollution in
urban areas, a neural network predictor and a dynamic
regression model for air quality forecasting and an
operational data assimilation system for air quality
prediction. No matter which model is used, it is important that simulated dispersion results are checked
against measurements of pollutant surface concentrations over the impact areas and followed by an analysis of the cause-effect relation between the emission
source and the ground-level concentration.
Clearly, robust models are needed to implement key
dispersion mechanisms such as mass-conservation
flows and wind fields that are operating in and constrained by a given geographic space with its unique
dynamic layout of various thematic features and to
LIU Gang-jun et al
Fig. 6
2.4
177
User interface
Fig. 7
Conclusion
In this paper, a geoinfomatics augmented environmental modelling and information sharing framework
is presented in terms of its key components and processes. These components and processes include:
1) an integrated, adaptive network of sensors for
environmental monitoring;
2) a set of distributed, interoperable databases for
data management;
3) a set of intelligent, robust algorithms and models
for environmental modelling;
4) a set of flexible, efficient user interfaces for data
access and information sharing;
5) a reliable, high capacity, high performance computing and communication infrastructure that integrates and supports the other framework components
and processes.
In this framework, environmental modelling and information sharing play important roles for participatory decision-making. The framework can be implemented by integrating state-of-the-art geoinformatics,
a unique fusion of relevant information and communication technologies and geographical information sci-
178
Vol.17
No.2
urban air pollutant transport and the resulting exposure, to establish quantitative links between sources,
exposure and risk of effects and to avoid both unacceptable contamination from excessive pollution
sources and uneconomic and unnecessary regulations.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
Argent R M. An overview of model integration for environmental applicationscomponents, frameworks and semantics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2004, 19: 219234.
Denzer R. Generic integration of environmental decision support systems: state-of-the-art. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20: 12171223.
Goodchild M. Integrating GIS and spatial data analysis: problems and possibilities. International Journal of Geographical
Information Science, 1992, 6: 407423.
Michael B. DANUBIA: an integrative simulation system for global change research in the upper danube basin. Cybemetics and
Systems: an International Journal, 2004, 35: 639666.
Watson F G R, Rahman J M. TARSIER: a practical software framework for model development, testing and deployment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2004, 19: 245260.
Denzer R. GIMMI: geographic information and mathematical models inter-operability. Environmental Modelling & Software,
2005, 20: 14781485.
Wang X. Integrating GIS, simulation models, and visualization in traffic impact analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban
Systems, 2005, 29: 471496.
David A B. A framework for the integration of geographical information systems and modelbase management. International
Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1997, 11: 337357.
Bernard L. Managing, modelling, and visualizing high-dimensional spatio-temporal data in an integrated system. Geoinformatica, 1998, 2: 5977.
Fedra K. Urban environmental management: monitoring, GIS, and modelling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,
1999, 23: 443457.
Li S T, Shue L Y. Data mining to aid policy making in air pollution management. Expert Systems with Applications, 2004, 27:
331340.
Brindley P. The effect of alternative representations of population location on the areal interpolation of air pollution exposure.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2005, 9(2): 455469.
Richards M. Grid-based analysis of air pollution data. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 194: 274286.
Shanmuganathan S. Self-organising map methods in integrated modelling of environmental and economic systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006, 21: 12471256.
UNEP. Global Environment Outlook 3. United Nations Environment Programme. London: Earthscan Publications, 2002.
Elsom D. Smog Alert: Managing Urban Air Quality. London: Earthscan, 1996.
Pummakarnchana O. Air pollution monitoring and GIS modelling: a new use of nanotechnology based solid state gas sensors.
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2005, 6: 251255.
Benarie M. Urban Air Pollution Modelling. US: The MIT Press, 1980.
Ashok K L, Peter J H. Evaluation of TAPM, a prognostic meteorological and air pollution model, using urban and rural pointsource data. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37: 27952810.
Susan M L. Future directions and challenges for quantitative environmental visualization. Landscape and Urban Planning,
1992, 21: 297299.