Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
sequence begins with 0 to -141 cm of modern fill, with remainders of bricks, glass,
plastics, etc. From -142 to -424 cm: buried soil, evolved from the upper loess,
classified as typical Argiustol. IRSL dating values are 19.12.5 kyr at the base and
14.02.1 kyr at the top (Frechen, M et al, 2003). This formation would be equivalent to
La Invernada as described by Cant, M (1992). Between -425 and -1119 cm. a loess
deposit, very likely equivalent to Pampeana Formation (Cant op cit.), is to be seen,
including three paleosols (Moretti, L., 2002). The first two are better developed than the
third. The last two have Cx horizons. Frechen (op cit.) considers the two lower
paleosols that we mention, as belonging to a pedocomplex, comprising rather three
paleosols, with ages varying from approximately 115 to 90 kyr at the bottom to 32 kyr
at the ceiling. The pedocomplex would have been formed during the OIS5, while the
upper loesswould correspond to the OIS3 (between about 32 kyr and 20 kyr).
Monte Ralo Profile: is located on the south limit of the homonymous locality,
inside the Undulated Tilted Platform, inside a small gully approximately 9 m deep.
From 0 to-80 cm, it presents modern fill with varying stratification. Between -81 and840 cm, there is an upper loessic sediment, corresponding to OIS3. On the top, a
moderately developed soil is to be found, classified as typical Argiustol. The aeolian
material is very brittle, yellowish brown, with powdered CaCO3 in the mass, and
frecuent biodisturbations. Between -841 and -900 cm there is a paleosol, scarce to
moderately developed. Ckb horizon contains scarce CaCO3 within the mass (Fm.
Pampeano) The ages for the two loess match well with those of Corralito I (Frechen M,
et al, op cit).
Lozada Profile: It is located in an artificial cut (a pipe which was thought to
transport water, but is out of use) located 8 km west of the Lozada locality, in the
Undulated Tilted Platform. Between 0 and -100 cm includes the material extracted
during the excavation of the channel. Between -100 and -380 cm the upper loess is well
exposed, bearing the zonal soil, scarcely developed (typical Haplustol). Loess material
presents the same characteristics as in the previous profiles. According to Kemp, R et
al .(2006), the O. S. L ages. are 25 kyr at the base and 5,7 kyr at the top. They are
correlated with OIS2. From -381 to -780 cm., biodisturbed fluvial material is found,
with coarse sands and silts, Ca CO3 in the mass, originated between 80 kyr and 25 kyr
(OIS3 and 4). Between -780 and -900 cm, an aeolian sediment is observed (Fm
Pampeano), with a moderately developed paleosol at the top. The ages for Pampeano
Formation span since 115 kyr for the base to 80 kyr for the ceiling (OIS5). According
to Kemp (op. cit) and Sanabria and Argello (2003) the ages at the profile would rather
be between 99.7 17.5 kyr and 55.6 10 kyr respectively. In this last case the samples
were dated by TL
According to the data yielded by the profiles, the main discussion matter is the
age of the upper loess top. In general terms, except for the river sediment intercalated in
Lozada, the three locations correlate well in relation to the sequence of loess/ paleosols,
independently of the number of exposed paleosols.
Very likely the difference in ISRL ages is due to the fact that the samples were
analyzed in different laboratories. Anyway, the great difference between Lozada profile
(5,7 kyr at the top) and the profiles of Corralito I and Monte Ralo (14 kyr at the ceiling)
affects interpretations concerning time as a factor in soils development and paleoclimate
evolution at western Crdoba pampean plain.
It is concluded that there is a certain correlation between the palaeo-surface
where paleosols developed, and the present surface. Corralito profile, located inside a
wide lowland, paleosols exhibit a greater development, including some cemented
horizons, related to hydromorphic environments. On the other hand, those profiles
located near the boundaries between low and high environments, soils are not so well
developed.
The analyzed stratigraphic profiles, including loess/paleosols sequences made it
possible to propose a model of paleoclimate evolution within the region, since 115 kyr
to the present, as follows.
Between 115 and 80 or 55 kyr - according to the different authors- the region
underwent three cycles with climatic alternation between dry and possibly hot ,related
to loess sedimentation; and temperate- humid, with soil development, as proved by the
paleosols present at Corralito I.
Before the deposition of the youngest loess, a humid period took place
producing the high terrace of Xanaes River, and perhaps also of those belonging, to all
other rivers of the zone. This period lasted differently at different sites and is marked by
fluvial sediments in Lozada profile
Between 25 kyr- the corresponding age for Corralito I is 41.4 6.1 kyr and the
14 kyr (or 5,7 kyr according to the sampling point and/or dating method, climate turned
into dry to semiarid, and the last loess is lain, on top of which, favoured by a new humid
cycle, the present soil represented by Oncativo Series, developed.
BIBLIOGRAFA
ARGELLO, G. y SANABRIA, J. A. 2000. Granulometra y caracterizacin estadstica
de materiales parentales en un sector del interfluvio Suqua- Xanaes. XVII Congreso
Argentino de la Ciencia del Suelo. Mar del Plata
BODENBENDER, G. 1890. La cuenca del valle del Ro Primero en Crdoba. Descripcin
geolgica del valle del ro Primero, desde las Sierras de Crdoba hasta la Mar Chiquita.
Bol. Ac. Nac. Cs. de Crdoba. T XII:5-55.
BODENBENDER,G. 1921.Resea hidrogeolgica de la Cuenca del Ro Primero en
Crdoba. Academia Nacional de Ciencias. Boletn Tomo XXV 2 :5-239.
CAPITANELLI, R.1979. Captulo V. Geomorfologa En: Vazquez,J.B. (ed) Geografa
Fsica de Crdoba. Ed Boldt. Bs.As: 213-296.
CASTELLANOS,A. 1918.Observaciones preliminares sobre el Pleistoceno de la Provincia
de Crdoba Academia Nacional de Ciencias Boletn Tomo XXIII.
CANTU,M. 1992.El Holoceno de la Provincia de Crdoba Primer Simposio Internacional
del Holoceno. Paran. Entre Ros .
CASTELLANOS, A. 1944.Paleontologa estratigrfica de los sedimentos negenos de
Crdoba. Pub. 23. Inst. de Fisiog. y Geologa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Rosario.
DRING, A. 1907. Serie estratigrfica del Pampeano de Crdoba Museo de La Plata.
Revista Tomo XIV.
FRECHEN, M.; ARGELLO, G.L.; BUDZIACK,D.; CANT, M.; CARLINI, A.
FRILLING, A.; KRUCK,W.; NORIEGA,J.; SANABRIA, J.A.; SCHEELE, B.;
TONNI,E. 2003. Chronoestratigraphy of Pampa loess- A Review. Conferencia invitada.
Actas del Segundo Congreso Argentino de Cuaternario y Geomorfologa. Tucumn.
Septiembre de 2003. pp 19-21.
FRENGUELLI, J. 1918. Notas preliminares sobre la constitucin geolgica del subsuelo
de la Cuenca de Crdoba. Bol. Ac. Nac. Cs. de Crdoba. T XXIII:203-228.
FRENGUELLI, J. 1921. Sobre un nuevo Proterotheriido del Pampeano Superior de
Crdoba, Neolicaphrium recens. nov. Actas de la Ac. Nac. de Ciencias de Crdoba, VII: 723. Crdoba.
IRIONDO, M. Y KRHLING, D. 1995. El Sistema Elico Pampeano. Com. Mus.
Prov. Cs. Naturales. Santa Fe. v 5 N 1. Pgs. 1-68.