Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PLAN 2014-2020
I. OVERVIEW OF THE LGU PROFILE
A. Ecological Profile
Brief History of Barugo, Leyte
During the early days of the Spanish regime in the Philippines, a group of
Malay traders headed by Tamodo landed on the northern plains of
Leyte.Tamodo and his brothers, Kasadok and Sikatuna,were accompanied
by some relatives, servants and other families. The said part of the island
was frequently drove by Moro plunderers and so they finally found a
settlement four(4) kilometers away from the seacoast. The area was an
ideal haven for them for it was safe from the easy approach of the Moro
plunderers. It offered them a peaceful settlement and an ideal hunting
ground for economic subsistence.
They found abundant gogo vines in the area which they loved to use
for bathing purposes, It is from this gogo word from which Balugo
which later became the name of the settlement was coined. After the
death of Tamodo, Kasadok rose into power. As the villages chieftain, he
changed the site of the settlement to a better place for strategic and
economic reasons. He consequently chose a place situated along the
banks of Arabunog River whose surrounding forest was good for rice
Page 1 of 50
Page 2 of 50
Page 4 of 50
PERCENT TO TOTAL
4,946.5756
55.25
4,006.2580
44.75
TOTAL
8,952.8258
Table 1: Bedrock formation of the Municipality
Source: Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) region VIII
100%
Soils
The Municipality of Barugo has six (6) soil types, Luisiana Clay with
2,496.000 hectares or 27.88% is found in northeastern and eastern
portions of the municipality. Guinbalaon Clay with 328.0000 hectares or
3.66% is found in the southeastern of the municipality. Palo Clay loam with
2,888.8258 hectares or 32.7% is found in the southeastern of the
municipality. In the central portion of the municipality, is San Manuel silt
loams with 2,296.0000 hectares or 3.26 are found around the estuarine
areas and along the seashore.
The description of the soil types with the corresponding crops suitable to
each type is given below.
1. Luisiana Clay - is characterized with rolling to hilly photography,
similar to the guinbalaon soils.
The soil is well drained. The run-off in cultivated area is excessive and
often times produce gullies.
In between slopes of hills the drainage condition is poor. Since water
collects in these areas are usually converted into lowland rise paddies.
Page 5 of 50
Page 7 of 50
LAND AREA
PERCENT TOTAL
2, 496.000
328.0000
2,888.8258
2,296.0000
652.0000
292.0000
27.88
3.66
32.27
25.65
7.28
3.26
TOTAL
8, 952.8258
Table No. 2 TEXTURE OF SOIL SURFACE
Source: Soil map, Bureau of Soils
100%
Land Capability
Page 8 of 50
Page 9 of 50
Page 10 of 50
LAND USES
1. Built-up
99.4747
2. Swamps,
Marshes /
664.1171
Mangroves
7,995.7384
Fishponds
105.5000
3. Agricultural
4. Open Water
87.9956
Spaces
5. Road Network /
Transportation
Facilities/Utilities
TOTAL
8,952.8258
Table No. 3 Existing General land Uses
SOURCES: DENR, Region VIII
PERCENT TO TOTAL
1.11
7.42
89.31
1.18
.98
100
Residential Areas
A total land area of 15.4739 hectares or 8.91% of the Poblacion land
area are being utilized primarily for residential purposes. These land areas
are widely dispersed within the six (6) districts of the Poblacion.
Commercial Areas
Areas for commercial purposes total to only 1.0001 hectares or
only .58% of the total urban land area. These include the area currently
used for the public market, the merchandizing stores, the sari-sari stores
and the like. These areas are mostly concentrated north of the Poblacion.
Agri- Industrial Areas:
The area occupied by the existing Rice mills and the corn mill at the
Poblacion is only .2652 hectare or only .15% of the total urban area.
Page 11 of 50
Page 12 of 50
Page 13 of 50
AREA IN HECTARES
1. Residential
15.4739
2. Commercial
1.0001
3. Agri-Industrial
.2652
4. Institutional
4.1626
5. Parks & Open
3.2194
Spaces
11.5818
6. transportation &
3.0000
Utilities
3.4217
7. Socialized Housing
87.0000
8. Vacant Areas
3.4217
9. Rivers, Creeks,
35.6171
Lakes & Seas
10. Agricultural
11. Swamps,
Marshes /Mangroves
Fishponds
TOTAL
257.6301
TABLE NO. 4 EXISTING URBAN LAND USES
Source: MPDO, Actual Survey
PERCENT TO TOTAL
8.91
.58
.15
2.40
1.85
6.67
1.73
1.97
33.76
53.50
20.50
100%
D. SOCIAL SERVICES
Only 11 Rural Barangays have no access to complete elementary
school level while all 37 Barangays have access to primary elementary
school. Three Barangays namely Calingcaguing, Sta. Rosa and Minuhang
have National High Schools while the Poblacion area has no existing High
School.
The Municipality has been constructing the Birthing Facility and will
be due for completion by year 2011.
The most proximate public hospital to Barugo is the Carigara District
Hospital (CDH) which is located at about 6 kilometers away from the town
proper. This is under the auspices of the Provincial Government of Leyte
and part of the Inter Local Health Zone (ITHZ), the Municipality is
allocating funds for operational subsidy of said hospital.
All of the Barangays have existing Day Care Centers. Children of age
3-4 years old are legitimate to enroll at said Barangay facility.
E. ECONOMY
Economic activities of the Municipality according to its major ranking
are positioned as follows; Agriculture and Fishery, Commercial and Service
Centers, and related Industries. Farming and fishing accounts the major
economic players with almost 80% are engaged into that area. Twenty
(20%) are shared by Commercial and Service Centers and related
industries such as public transport, retail and wholesale, hardware,
household and business services, sand and gravel, and other small scale
service facilities and industries.
There are also existing local tourism spots such as beach resorts
which are for continuous development by the private sector.
Page 15 of 50
H. INSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY
Total Land Area:
The municipality of Barugo occupies a total land area of 8,952.8258
hectares. This total land area is distributed to its 37 barangays including
the town proper or the Poblacion. Only 170.6301 hectares or 1.95%
belongs to the poblacion, while the biggest portion of 8,782.1957 hectares
or 98.05% is the area of the 31 rural barangays. The biggest Barangay in
terms of land area is Barangay Ibag with 845.4843 hectares, followed by
Barangay Balud with 721.7234 hectares and Barangay Santa Rosa with
712.4054 hectares while the barangay with the smallest land area is
Barangay Minuswang with 86.0562 hectares, followed by Barangay
Domogdog with 91.7919 hectares and Barangay Cuta with 125.9273
hectares.
Total Number of Barangays:
37 Barangays with 10 Coastal and 27 landlocked barangays.
10 Coastal Barangays
1. Canomantag
6. Poblacion District V
2. Minuswang
7. Domogdog
3. Santarin
8. Minuhang
4. Poblacion District I
9. Balud
5. Poblacion District III
10. Duka
27 Landlocked Barangays
1. Abango
11. Hiagsam
21. Pongso
2. Amahit
12. Hilaba
22. Roosevelt
Page 17 of 50
Balire
Bukid
Bulod
Busay
Caboloan
Calingcaguing
Can-Isak
Guindaohan
13.
14.
15.
16.
Hinugayan
23. San Isidro
Ibag
24. Sta. Rosa
Pikas
25. Tutug-an
Pitogo
26. Cabarasan
17. Poblacion District II 27. San Roque
18. Poblacion District III
19. Poblacion District IV
20. Poblacion District VI
Organizational Structure
POLITICAL PROFILE:
Name of Mayor:
Name of Vice Mayor:
&
Green
2. Hon. Venerando C. Villasin Chairperson: Public Market &
Slaughter
House
3. Hon. Efren A. Avestruz
Appropriation
Chairperson:
4. Hon. Federico Ayes Jr.
Protection
Matters, Public Safety & Human Rights
5. Hon. Antonio Arpon
Chairperson: Engineering,
Infrastructure &
Public Works
5. Hon. Divina C. Buales
& Science
Chairperson: Housing, &
Page 18 of 50
Chairperson: Agriculture,
Fisheries &
Cooperatives
Chairperson: Natural Resources, &
Environmental Protection
7. Hon. Marilyn A. Astorga
Chairperson: Oversight
Committee
Chairperson: Human Resource
Enhancement, Gender Advancement
Social & Cultural Affairs
Chairperson: Appointment, Promotion,
Labor & Employment
Page 19 of 50
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Hon.
Alden L. Apostol
Jeffrey C. Caezal
Marl A. De Guzman
Jesus B. Cabanacan
Angel P. Tiu Jr.
Violeta A. Magadan
Alejandro A. Darnayla
Joemar Q. Acebo
Eusebio B. Boreres
Rogelio C. Claros
Magdalena C.
Salvacion
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Bulod
Busay
Cabarasan
Caboloan
Calingcaguing
Can-isak
Canomantag
Cuta
Domogdog
Duka
Guindaohan
Hiagsam
Hilaba
Hinugayan
Ibag
Minuhang
Minuswang
Pikas
Pitogo
Pongso
Roosevelt
San Isidro
San Roque
Santarin
Sta. Rosa
Tutug-an
Page 20 of 50
Page 21 of 50
Almost one third of the area in Barugo will be flooded in a worst case scenario
situation. That would be possible if there will be a Category 5 Typhoon (with
wind speed of more than 250 kph and rainfall amount of more than 300 mm),
high tide, too much rainfall and storm surge inundation.
Page 23 of 50
Page 24 of 50
Because of the low elevation and gently rolling terrain of Barugo, it is only
categorized as having low susceptibility to rain induced landslide hazard.
Barugo has initiated Barangay Based Participatory Land Use Planning through
the assistance of German International Cooperation (GIZ) and one of the
output of all barangays is to come up with a risk assessment and mapping of
their respective barangays. Their output were consolidated, validated and
processed by the sectoral planning body as well as the technical staff of the
Municipality.
As shown below is the photo of the barangay based land use and risk
assessment in one of the baragay;
Page 25 of 50
Below is the risk assessment matrix summary of the municipality in relation to hydro-meteorological hazards;
VULNERABILITY
HAZARD
SENSITIVITY
Flooding
Storm
Surge
Rain
induced
landslide
VULNERABILITY/
RISK
RATING
EXPOSURE
CAPACITY
600 hectares of Catch basin area (Slope 0-5 meters is almost 1/3
Riceland prone toof the total area.
flooding
Page 27 of 50
BARUGO
Page 28 of 50
Page 29 of 50
Barangays near the coastal zone and those having clayish type of soil is
prone to liquefaction hazard as shown on the map. Twenty (20) barangays are
prone to liquefaction.
Page 30 of 50
BARUGO,
LEYTE
Barugo is prone to locally generated tsunami and has a very low susceptibility
to be affected by tsunami caused by the movement of the Philippine trench or
from a distant offshore earthquake source.
Page 31 of 50
Below is the risk assessment matrix summary of the municipality in relation to geological hazards;
VULNERABILITY
HAZARD
SENSITIVITY EXPOSURE
CAPACITY
VULNERABILITY/
RISK
RATING
High (Ground
Shaking,
Liquefaction)
Medium - Tsunami
Hazard)
1. Communities
still need more trainings
and rescue equipments.
2. The Municipality is
very much exposed to
earthquake related
hazards.
3. High poverty index.
Page 32 of 50
B) Preparedness
STRENGHT
-Functional and
trained MDRRMC and
BDRRMC
-Presence of
approved plans
(CLUP/CDP/ELA/BDP)
-Trained GIS staff
-GIS/GPS equipments
-Designated &
trained LDRRMO
-Flood mitigation
structures (river flood
control and seawall)
-Mangroves at
shoreline
-Functional and
trained MDRRMC and
BDRRMC
-Designated &
trained LDRRMO
-Presence of
community
volunteers
-Trained Health and
MSWDO staff
-Access to early
warning system.
WEAKNESS
-LGU is highly
dependent to
Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) share
for its DRRM and CCA
programs and
projects.
-Some barangays
have no or lack flood
control structures.
OPPORTUNITY
-Presence of partners
such as German
International
Cooperation (GIZ),
Office of Civil
Defense (OCD),
Department of
Science &
Technology (DOST),
DPWH, DA, DSWD,
MGB, DENR,
PHIVOLCS and
Province of Leyte.
-LGU is highly
dependent to
Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) share
for its DRRM and CCA
programs and
projects
-Presence of partners
such as German
International
Cooperation (GIZ),
Red Cross, Office of
Civil Defense (OCD),
Department of
Science &
Technology (DOST),
DPWH, DA, DSWD,
MGB, DENR,
PHIVOLCS and
Province of Leyte.
THREAT
-Lack of flood control
and sea wall.
-Coastal erosion due
to sea level rise
-Settlement within
coastal areas
(Foreshore and
Salvage Zones)
-Decreasing tree
cover at headwater
or ridges of
watershed
Change of political
leadership in MLGU &
BLGUs.
-Change of political
leadership in MLGU &
BLGUs.
-Out migration of
community
volunteers especially
rescue volunteers
Page 33 of 50
THEMATIC AREAS
C) Response
D) Rehabilitation &
Recovery
STRENGHT
-Functional and
trained MDRRMC and
BDRRMC
-Designated &
trained LDRRMO
-Presence of
community
volunteers
-Trained Health and
MSWDO staff
-MOU with local
retailers
Presence of RDANA
Team
-Functional and
trained MDRRMC and
BDRRMC
-Designated &
trained LDRRMO
Presence of
community
volunteers
-Trained technical
personnel to
formulate
Rehabilitation &
Recovery Plan
-
WEAKNESS
LGU is highly
dependent to
Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) share
for its DRRM and CCA
programs and
projects
- Lack of Response
equipments
OPPORTUNITY
-Presence of partners
such as German
International
Cooperation (GIZ),
Red Cross, Office of
Civil Defense (OCD),
Department of
Science &
Technology (DOST),
DPWH, DA, DSWD,
MGB, DENR,
PHIVOLCS and
Province of Leyte.
THREAT
Change of political
leadership in MLGU &
BLGUs.
-Out migration of
community
volunteers especially
rescue volunteers
LGU is highly
dependent to
Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) share
for its DRRM and CCA
programs and
projects
Presence of partners
such as German
International
Cooperation (GIZ),
Red Cross, Office of
Civil Defense (OCD),
Department of
Science &
Technology (DOST),
DPWH, DA, DSWD,
MGB, DENR,
PHIVOLCS and
Province of Leyte.
Change of political
leadership in MLGU &
BLGUs.
Page 34 of 50
Page 35 of 50
OBJECTIVE
Impact 1
1. Reduced
vulnerability &
exposure of
communities to all
hazards
Outcome 1
1.1.Improved
mainstreaming &
integration of
DRRM-CCA in local
policies, plan and
budget
Output 1.1
1.1.1 Established
LDRRMC and
committees
Activity
Issuance of
Executive Order/
Ordinance
establishing &
institutionalizing the
LDRRM council
Output 1.2
1.1.2 Integrated
DRRM-CCA in
updated CLUP, CDP,
AIP, Term-based
plan
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
BASELINE
% of communities
living in high and
medium risk areas
% reduction in amount
of damage and losses
records of previous
damage and losses
% of barangays who
have mainstreamed
and integrated DRMMCCA in their local
policies , plans and
budget
# of workshops and
meetings conducted
minutes and
attendance
# of executive order
issued
# of updated plans
TARGET
2014-2020
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
25% of high
and medium
vulnerable
communities
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
50%reduction
in the amount
of damage and
losses
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
100% of
barangays
6 workshops
and 12
meetings/ year
conducted
1 executive
order
1 CLUP, 1 CDP,
6 AIPs, 1 Termbased plans
1
executi
ve
order
1 CLUP
1 AIP
1
executi
ve
order
1 AIP
1 CDP
1 AIP
1 Term
Based
Plan
1
executi
ve
order
1 AIP
1 AIP
Activity
Page 36 of 50
1 AIP
RESPONS
IBLE
PERSON/
AGENCY
SOUR
CE
OF
FUND
S
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRR
MF
&
grant
1 AIP
# of trainings
conducted
3 trainings
3
training
s
MDRRMC
Page 37 of 50
LDRR
MF
&
grant
Output 1.3
1.1.3 Organized a
pool of experts to
provide technical
assistance to
barangays
Activity
Identification,
screening and
designation of
potential technical
experts to include
CSOs
OUTCOME 1.2
1.2 Enhanced
DRRM-CCA
sensitivity of
environmental
management
program
OUTPUT 1.2.1
1.2.1 Reduced
number of
communities living
in hazard prone
areas
ACTIVITY
1. implementation
of IEC for relocation
of communities in
high and medium
risk areas
2. Development of
policy on relocation
3. Selection and
development of
relocation sites
according to DRRM
hazard maps
OUTPUT 1.2.2
1.2.2 Implemented
programs related to
agricultural and
environmental
resources in support
of DRRM-CCA
# of experts trained
and # of executive
order issued
# of brgys provided w/
technical assistance
15 experts
# of potential technical
experts
15 technical
experts
# of environmental
programs where DRRMCCA is integrated
# of households able
to cope with hazards
# of IEC conducted
# of policy enacted
# of sites assessed
and identified
# of
programs/projects/activ
ities per year related
to agriculture &
environment
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
100% of
communities
provided w/
IEC
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
37
barang
ays
1 ordinance
on relocation
enacted
1
ordinan
ce
4
relocati
on site
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
10 PPAs
per
year
100%
environmental
programs
100% of
communities
w/ enhanced
coping
mechanism
3-4 relocation
sites identified
10 PPAs per
year
Page 38 of 50
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRMC
LDRRMF
&
grant
ACTIVITY
1. Implementation
of greening program
2. Implementation
of solid waste
management
program
3. Implementation
of coastal resource
management
OUTPUT 1.2.3
1.2.3 Enforced laws
and ordinances
protecting
environmentally
critical areas
ACTIVITY
1. Implementation
of zoning ordinance
and other related
laws
2. Formulation of
Environment Code
OUTPUT 1.2.4
1.2.4 implemented
programs related to
watershed, coastal
and marine
management
ACTIVITY
1. tree planting/ tree
management
program
2. enactment of
DRRM-CCA
ordinance
# of laws enacted
# of
environmental/regulati
on
permits granted
# OF PPAs
implementaed
5 ordinances
5 PPAs per
year
1
ordinan
ce
1
ordinan
ce
1
ordinanc
e
2
ordina
nce
3. Establishment of
comprehensive
monitoring system
4. Awareness-raising
in watershed coastal
and marine
importance
5. Capacity
involvement on
watershed coastal
and marine and
wetland
conservation
Page 39 of 50
MDRRM
C
LDRRMF
&
grant
MDRRM
C
LDRRMF
&
grant
B) PREPAREDNESS
Goal - Establish and strengthen capacities of communities to anticipate, cope and recover from the negative impacts of
emergency occurrences and disasters
OBJECTIV
ES
IMPACTS
Scaled
up
prepared
ness of
the
communi
ty for
any
occurenc
e of
disaster
&
calamitie
s
thereby
resulting
to
minimal
degree
or
absence
of
damage
&
casualtie
s
OUTCOM
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
TARGET
(2013-2017)
MAJOR
ASSUM
PTION
MOV
Percentage of
damage/casualty
during
disaster/calamity
0 no. of
death from
natural,
biological &
man made
hazards
80%
reduction in
damages to
properties
40%
reduction in
damages to
crops.
DRRM
Office
Plantilla
to be
spared
from
Personn
el
Service
s
limitati
on by
NDRRM
C
RDANA
REPORTS
POST DANA
AGENCY BASE
RESPONS LINE
IBLE
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
MDRRMC
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
2011
POST
DANA
REPO
RT
Page 40 of 50
E 7.0
7.0)
Increase
d level of
awarene
ss &
enhance
d
capacity
of the
communi
ty to
deal with
hazards,
threats &
impacts.
OUTPUT
7.0
7.0)
Advocac
y plans
formulat
ed & IEC
produce
d
Advocac
y
conducte
d & IEC
(Flyers,
Posters
& etc.
distribut
ed
ACTIVITI
ES 7.0
7.0.)
Develop
DRRM &
CCA IEC
&
Advocac
y plans &
Percentage of
population
informed & have
become
proactive
37
Barangays
80% HH/yr
Strong
support
from
commu
nity &
stakeho
lders
Post activity
reports,
trainings, IEC,
drills
conducted
MLGU/M
DRRMC
CSOs/NG
As
BDRRMC
37
Brgys
50%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
# of advocacy
plans
formulated/IEC
materials
produced w/
approval seal
# of attendees
for IEC/Advocacy
# of HH/people
signed the
reciept form
1 Advocacy
plan/yr
3000 IEC
materials/yr
37
Barangays
80% of HH
Budget
ary
support
availabl
e
Signed
accomplishm
ent Report
Attendance
Sheet
Signed
Reciept Form
MDRRMO
BDRRMC
NGAs
37
Brgys
50%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
# of Advocacy
plans/IEC
produced
1 Advocacy
plan/yr
3000 IEC
materials/yr
Budget
ary
support
availabl
e
copies/pictur
es of IEC
materials
MDRRMO
BDRRMC
NGAs
37
Brgys
50%
HH
Page 41 of 50
conduct
advocac
y & IEC
to 37
baranga
ys on
disaster
prepared
ness &
response
.
# of
IEC/Advocacy
conducted
37
Barangays
80% HH
Budget
ary
support
availabl
e
Pictures of
IEC conduct
# of
flyers/posters
distributed
37
Barangays
80% HH
Budget
ary
support
availabl
e
Signed
Reciept Form
OBJECTIVES
IMPACTS
Scaled up preparedness of the
community for any occurence of
disaster & calamities thereby
resulting to minimal degree or
absence of damage & casualties
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
37
Br
gy
s
80
%
HH
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
TARGET (20132017)
MAJOR
ASSUMPTIO
N
MOV
AGENCY
RESPONSIB
LE
Percentage of
damage/casualty during
disaster/calamity
0 no. of death
from natural,
biological & man
made hazards
80% reduction in
damages to
properties
40% reduction in
damages to crops.
DRRM Office
Plantilla to
be spared
from
Personnel
Services
limitation by
NDRRMC
RDANA
REPORT
S
POST
DANA
MDRRMC
OUTCOME 7.10
7.1) Communities are equipped with
necessary skills and capability to
cope with the impact of disasters.
OUTPUT 7.1
Page 42 of 50
BASELINE
201
4
201
5
201
6
201
7
201
8
201
9
202
0
2011
POST DANA
REPORT
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
37
Brgy
s
80%
HH
Page 44 of 50
Page 45 of 50
C) RESPONSE
Goal - Provide life preservation and meet the basic subsistence needs of affected population based on affected population
based on acceptable standards during or immediately after a disaster
0BJECTIVES
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
BASELIN
E
TARGETS
201
4
201
5
37
Minimize the # of
brgys. That will
need immediate
assistance
37
100% of the
barangays with
well-established
Disaster Response
Center and
personnel
201
6
201
7
201
8
201
9
202
0
14
18
22
29
IMPACT
Preserved life and
met basic needs
during and
immediately after a
disaster
OUTCOME
Well-established
disaster response
operations
37 Barangays provided
with timely assistance
OUTPUT
Availability of
sufficient supply of
relief goods, food,
medicines and other
services relevant to
disaster response.
ACTIVITIES
1. Mobilization
and
deployment of
trained
100%
100% availability
of supplies
needed
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100%
100% Mobilization
and Deployment
of trained
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
% of available supplies
Number of trained
personnel and volunteers
mobilized and deployed to
Page 46 of 50
personnel and
volunteers thru
assessment,
validation and
assistance
37 brgys.
personnel and
volunteers to 37
Barangays
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
BASELIN
E
201
4
201
5
201
6
201
7
201
8
201
9
Percentage of affected
families with sustained high
economic condition
37 BRGY
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
Percentage economic
activities restored and
strengthened
37 BRGY
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
Page 47 of 50
1. Conduct
damage
assessment
and need
analysis
2.Presentatio
n and
Prioritazation
of needs
3.
Identification
and
masterlisting
of
Beneficiaries
4.
Coordination
with other
national
Agencies
5.
Preparation
of necessary
documents
6. Release of
Farn Inputs
OUTPUT 2:
Provided
Micro lending
assistance
ACTIVITIES:
1. Conduct
damage
assessment
and need
analysis
2.
Presentation
and
prioritazation
of needs
3.
Identification
and
masterlisting
of
Number of Damage
assessment and need
analysis conducted
Percentage of programs,
projects/ needs prioritized
Number of Agencies
coordinated
Percentage of completeness
of documents
25 Damage assessment
and need analysis
conducted
80% of needs prioritized
Actual number of
Affected Families
100% of Affected
families availed micro
lending assistance
25 Damage assessment
and need analysis
conducted
80% of needs prioritized
Number of programs,
projects/ needs prioritized
Number of Affected Families
( Beneficiaries )
masterlisted
25
25
25
25
25
25
Actual
number
of needs
assessed
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
5
national
agencies
100%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
25
occurrenc
e of
calamitie
s
25
25
25
25
25
25
Actual
number
of needs
assessed
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
5 national agencies
100% complete and
accurate
Actual number of Farm
inputs received by
Affected Person
Number of Damage
assessment and need
analysis conducted
25
occurrenc
e of
calamitie
s
Actual number of
Affected Families
Page 48 of 50
Beneficiaries
Page 49 of 50
4. Coordination with
other national
Agencies and private
lending institution
Number of funding
5 national agencies
Agencies and private and 3 private
lending institutions
lending institutions
coordinated
Actual number of
Number of Skills
skills training
Training and
5. Orientation and
conducted
Orientation
skills training of
depending on the
Conducted
beneficiaries
result of PDNA
Number of Affected
6. Release of
families availed
Actual number of
Livelihood Assistance livelihood Assistance Affected Families
100%
100%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100%
100%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
Page 50 of 50