Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
ZIPBUDS, LLC.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
22
1. INFRINGEMENT OF U.S.
PATENT NO. D652,407 S;
2. INFRINGEMENT OF U.S.
PATENT NO. 8,455,758;
3. TRADE DRESS
INFRINGEMENT; UNFAIR
COMPETITION;
4. TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT; UNFAIR
COMPETITION;
5. UNFAIR COMPETITION;
6. STATUTORY UNFAIR
COMPETITION; AND
7. DECLARATORY AND
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
23
JURY DEMANDED
14
2X MOBILE, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
///
28
///
1
THE PARTIES
1.
company organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with its
principal place of business located at 10225 Barnes Canyon Rd., Suite A106, San
Diego CA 92121.
2.
organized and existing, on information and belief, under the laws of the State of
Pennsylvania, with its principal place of business at, on information and belief, 475
10
11
3.
This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the Patent
12
Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. sections 1 etseq. Subject matter jurisdiction is
13
therefore proper under 28 U.S.C. sections 1331 and 1338(a). This is also an action
14
for trademark and trade dress infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham
15
16
4.
17
minimum contacts with the State of California such that the exercise of jurisdiction
18
does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 2X has
19
purposefully availed itself of the benefits of the California forum, and has continued
20
selling products infringing Zipbuds patents despite clear notice and knowledge that
21
the continued sales would harm the San Diego companys intellectual property rights
22
23
5.
This Court further has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims and
24
25
26
27
and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
28
///
2
6.
and (c) and 1400(b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise
to the claims occurred in the district; Plaintiff resides in this district; and the
this judicial district by, among others, its repeated availment and direction of its
activity toward this district, and engaging in acts of infringement in this judicial
district.
8
9
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
7.
10
type of headphone that is both useful and highly aesthetically pleasing. The design is
11
so aesthetically pleasing and ornamental that Zipbuds pursued and obtained a design
12
patent to protect against others who may wish to sell what an ordinary observer
13
would view as the same product. A copy of Zipbuds U.S. Design Patent, US
14
15
8.
16
earphones was such a novel invention that Zipbuds was also awarded another patent
17
for its invention, U.S. Patent No. 8,455,758 (the 758 Patent). A copy of the 758
18
19
9.
20
21
ZIPBUDS for its highly aesthetic ear phones featuring a zipper. The mark makes
22
use of its distinctive subparts a prefix relating to the concept of a zipper, followed
23
by a suffix relating to the concept of an ear bud. To protect its trademark and provide
24
notice to the public that the trademark was for its exclusive use, Zipbuds sought and
25
26
connection with audio headphones. A copy of that U.S. Trademark, Reg. No.
27
28
Trademark).
3
10.
Zipbuds has been marketing and selling its unique ZIPBUDS ear buds
since at least as early as November 9, 2010, and has gained significant market
recognition. Zipbuds products have been very successful, generating over $1 million
in revenue each year from 2011 onward. The colorful, high-quality ear buds have
become known for their quality and superior product design. By 2012, the ZIPBUDS
earphones won Travel & Leisures best personal gadget award. They have been
featured extensively in the media. Zipbuds has been featured on, among others, the
Ellen Show, New York Times and Travel Channel. These products have been
recognized for their innovation, and also their successful refinement of an earphone
10
11
11.
12
13
infringes the trade dress, trademark, design patent and utility patent of Zipbuds.
14
12.
15
16
specifically San Diego. Not only is their product a copy of Zipbuds valuable
17
patented design, it is also marketed as the Zipper Earphones with features that are
18
19
design and utility patents. The Zipper Earphones name is, conveniently, straight from
20
21
simply replaces Zip with Zipper, and buds with earphones, and putting a
22
space between the terms. These superficial changes do not stop consumers from
23
24
13.
The Accused Product also infringes the design of the 407 Patent, the
25
claims of the 758 Patent, and the trade dress of the Zipbuds earphones that utilize
26
these valuable patent rights. The 407 and 758 Patents were both issued after review
27
28
///
4
14.
4
5
15.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2X Zipper Earphones
758 Patent
407 Patent
16
17
16.
The Zipper Earphones by 2X copy the key features of the 407 Patents
18
design, including two distinct portions of the earbud prior to the malleable portion, a
19
zipper that terminates prior to reaching the earbud (in this case, utilizing a piece of
20
plastic sheathing the cord), and using a rectangular zipper tab and a zipper with
21
rounded upper edges. In addition to these design elements, the color scheme
22
associated with the ZIPBUDS past and current trade dress uses overlapping colors,
23
24
17.
25
infringing offers for sale and sales of its infringing products. 2X has been
26
specifically notified of the infringement, and has simply chosen to disregard its
27
28
Product, both online and at retail locations, makes 2Xs infringement willful.
5
18.
responsibility for selling infringing products, and to protect Zipbuds valuable patents
and trademarks from unlawful exploitation, Zipbuds brings this suit against 2X.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
19.
Complaint.
20.
Zippered Earphones, was duly and legally issued to Zipbuds, who has the right to
enforce this patent.
21.
14
using, selling, offering for sale, importing, and/or actively inducing others to use
15
products that infringe one or more of the patented design(s) in the 407 Patent, and is
16
thus liable for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 and 289 et seq. The
17
Accused Product so resembles the 407 Patent, including Claim 1, that in the eye of
18
an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, the visual
19
20
23.
21
induced retailers to continue selling the Accused Product even after it unequivocally
22
knew of the 407 Patent, having received a cease-and-desist letter from Zipbuds and
23
its counsel. 2X acted in a manner that encouraged retailers to infringe on the 407
24
Patent.
25
24.
2X knew that if it did not remove the Accused Product from its online
26
store or retailer shelves, the natural and likely consequence was their continued sale.
27
2X intended for sales of the Accused Product to continue. 2X knew or should have
28
known that those acts would cause retailers to continue infringing the 407 Patent, 2X
6
blindness by.
25.
$75,000.
26.
continue to cause immediate and irreparable harm to Zipbuds for which there is no
adequate remedy at law, unless this Court enjoins and restrains such activities.
27.
Defendant knew of the 407 Patent prior to the filing of this lawsuit.
10
28.
11
was objectively reckless due to the high likelihood that its actions constituted
12
infringement of a valid patent, and knew or should have known of this objectively-
13
defined risk because the risk was so obvious. Thus, Zipbuds is entitled to enhanced
14
damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, and costs incurred prosecuting this action.
15
16
29.
17
18
19
20
21
30.
Complaint.
31.
22
Organization Assemblies, was duly and legally issued to Zipbuds, who has the right
23
24
32.
25
using, selling, offering for sale, importing, and/or actively inducing others to use
26
products that infringe one or more of the claims in the 758 Patent, and is thus liable
27
for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. This includes the practice by
28
7
Defendant via the Accused Product, which infringes at least Claims 1 and 18 of the
758 Patent.
33.
because it actively induced retailers to continue selling the Accused Product even
letter from Zipbuds and its counsel. 2X acted in a manner that encouraged retailers to
34.
2X knew that if it did not remove the Accused Product from its online
store or retailer shelves, the natural and likely consequence was their continued sale.
10
2X intended for sales of the Accused Product to continue. 2X knew or should have
11
known that those acts would cause retailers to continue infringing the 758 Patent, 2X
12
13
blindness.
14
35.
15
16
$75,000.
17
36.
18
continue to cause immediate and irreparable harm to Zipbuds for which there is no
19
adequate remedy at law, unless this Court enjoins and restrains such activities.
20
37.
Defendant knew of the 758 Patent prior to the filing of this lawsuit.
21
38.
22
was objectively reckless due to the high likelihood that its actions constituted
23
infringement of a valid patent, and knew or should have known of this objectively-
24
defined risk because the risk was so obvious. Thus, Zipbuds is entitled to enhanced
25
damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, and costs incurred prosecuting this action.
26
39.
27
28
///
8
4
5
6
40.
Complaint.
41.
Plaintiff owns the trade dress rights to the trade dress of its ZIPBUDS
products by virtue of its long and continuous use which has come to associate the
trade dress with itself in the minds of the relevant consuming public.
42.
10
43.
Defendant has sold and offered for sale counterfeit goods, as alleged
11
above, falsely designating their origin. This includes trade dress infringement of
12
13
14
15
44.
and willful.
45.
Defendants uses are likely to cause confusion and mistake with the
16
public and deceive them into believing that there is an affiliation, connection and
17
18
46.
19
has suffered and continues to suffer substantial pecuniary losses and irreparable
20
injury to its business reputation and goodwill. As such, Zipbuds remedy at law is
21
22
23
47.
By reason of such wrongful acts, Zipbuds is and was, and will be in the
24
future, deprived of, among others, the profits and benefits of business relationships,
25
agreements, and transactions with various existing clients and/or prospective clients
26
and customers. Defendant has wrongfully obtained said profits and benefits.
27
28
4
5
48.
Complaint.
6
7
49.
audio headphones.
8
9
50.
10
51.
11
ownership and use of the ZIPBUDS trademark prior to its use of the Zipper
12
Earphones mark for the Accused Product, and prior to its May 29, 2015 application
13
for registration of the mark with the USPTO (said U.S. App. Serial No. 86/645,040 is
14
15
52.
16
17
18
19
20
consumers.
21
53.
X2s use of the Zipper Earphones title for the Accused Product is
22
highly likely to confuse or deceive consumers into believing that the Accused Product
23
24
25
Zipbuds.
26
54.
27
28
///
10
55.
irreparable injury.
56.
this infringement, and to recover X2s profits, Zipbuds actual damages, statutory
damages, enhanced profits and damages, costs, and attorneys fees, along with other
damages.
UNFAIR COMPETITION
10
11
12
57.
Complaint.
13
14
58.
Plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the ZIPBUDS trade dress by
15
16
59.
above.
17
60.
18
has suffered and continues to suffer substantial pecuniary losses and irreparable
19
injury to its business reputation and goodwill. As such, Zipbuds remedy at law is
20
21
22
61.
By reason of such wrongful acts, Zipbuds is and was, and will be in the
23
future, deprived of, among others, the profits and benefits of business relationships,
24
agreements, and transactions with various existing clients and/or prospective clients
25
and customers. Defendant has wrongfully obtained said profits and benefits.
26
27
28
///
11
1
2
62.
Such acts, as alleged above, were done with malice, oppression and/or
6
7
63.
Complaint.
8
9
64.
10
65.
11
has suffered and continues to suffer substantial pecuniary losses and irreparable
12
injury to its business reputation and goodwill. As such, Zipbuds remedy at law is
13
14
15
66.
By reason of such wrongful acts, Zipbuds is and was, and will be in the
16
future, deprived of, among others, the profits and benefits of business relationships,
17
agreements, and transactions with various existing clients and/or prospective clients
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
67.
Complaint.
25
68.
26
the USPTO the Zipper Earphone Application (Ser. No. 86/645,040), and as alleged
27
28
///
12
69.
that Plaintiff is the rightful owner of the confusingly similar Zipper Earphones, and
70.
The remedies at law are inadequate and irreparable harm will inure
without equitable injunctive relief. The Court should enter an injunction requiring
the transfer of all rights and interests in Ser. No. 86/645,040 (and any registration it
matures into) to Plaintiff. This includes pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116(a) and 1119.
PRAYER
10
11
1.
12
counts;
13
14
2.
15
3.
16
unjust enrichment, Defendants profits, and lost sales, with such damages enhanced
17
18
5.
Statutory damages;
19
6.
20
21
7.
22
8.
23
9.
24
10.
Restitution;
25
11.
26
been willful and trebling the damages awarded to Plaintiff, as provided by 35 U.S.C.
27
284;
28
///
13
1
2
12.
13.
and
14.
Earphones Application (Ser. No. 86/645,040, and any registration that issues
thereon), and requiring its transfer (and/or cancellation) to Plaintiff, including under
10
15.
Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
49863196v.1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14
JS 44 (Rev. 11/15)
Case 3:16-cv-01857-JAH-JLB
DocumentSHEET
1-1 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 2
CIVIL COVER
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
ZIPBUDS, LLC.
DEFENDANTS
2X MOBILE, INC.
3 Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
2 U.S. Government
Defendant
4 Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
DEF
PTF
DEF
3 Foreign Nation
CONTRACT
110 Insurance
310 Airplane
120 Marine
REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
690 Other
BANKRUPTCY
OTHER STATUTES
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
410 Antitrust
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
450 Commerce
840 Trademark
SOCIAL SECURITY
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Management
Relations
460 Deportation
470 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations
850 Securities/Commodities/
Exchange
220 Foreclosure
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
530 General
896 Arbitration
V. ORIGIN (Place an X
1 Original
Proceeding
2 Removed from
State Court
3 Remanded from
Appellate Court
4 Reinstated or
Reopened
5 Transferred from
Another District
6 Multidistrict
Litigation
(Specify)
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (D o notcite ju risd ictionalstatu tes u nless d iversity):
APPLYING IFP
s/ Andrew D. Skale
JUDGE
MAG. JUDGE
(b)
(c)
Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the defendant is the location of the tract of land involved.)
Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section (see attachment) .
II.
Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an X
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an X in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III.
Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV.
Nature of Suit. Place an X in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V.
VI.
Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII.
Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an X in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 1
(12)
(54)
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD652407S
(10)
Groset et al.
(45)
(73)
(**)
Term:
(21)
(22)
Filed:
14 Years
1509062 Al
2/2005
(Continued)
Primary Examiner - Paula Greene
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm - Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris
Glovsky and Popeo, P.c.
DESCRIPTION
(63)
(51)
(52)
(58)
** Jan.17,2012
(57)
CLAIM
The ornamental design for zippered earphones, as shown and
described.
(56)
US D652,407 S
ZIPPERED EARPHONES
EP
(75)
Patent No.:
Date of Patent:
11111111111
(Continued)
EXHIBIT 1
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4/2009
7/2009
8/2009
912009
1212009
112010
4/2010
5/2011
Hong et al . ..................
Bennett ........................
Matsuda et al. .............
Ando ...........................
Ando ...........................
Pedersen, II .................
Rogers et al. ................
Okano et al. .................
D14/205
021/791
D14/223
D14/205
D14/205
D14/206
D14/206
026/135
D637,999
D643,414
2005/0069147
201110162883
S
S
Al
Al
*
*
5/2011
8/2011
3/2005
7/2011
2004056636 A
2009030578 Al
* cited by examiner
EXHIBIT 1
212004
3/2009
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 1 of9
Fig. 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 3
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
u.s. Patent
Sheet 2 of9
Jao.17,2012
Fig. 4
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
u.s. Patent
Jan. 17,2012
Sheet 3 of9
Fig. 5
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 4 of9
Fig. 6
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 5 of9
US D652,407 S
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
EXHIBIT 1
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 6 of9
US D652,407 S
I I
I I I
Fig. 10
Fig. 9
Fig. 11
EXHIBIT 1
u.s. Patent
Sheet 7 of 9
Fig. 13
Fig. 12
Fig. 14
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 8 of9
US D652,407 S
.0'>
u:
EXHIBIT 1
u.s. Patent
Jao.17,2012
Sheet 9 of9
Fig. 16
EXHIBIT 1
US D652,407 S
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 2
(12)
(54)
(75)
(73)
(*)
(10)
Groset et al.
(45)
(22)
Filed:
S
S
A
A
S
A
A
CN
CN
Spilman et al.
Falkenberg et al.
Lee et al.
Brinkhoff et al.
Hutchinson et al.
Itagaki et al.
Sarber
Crenna
Pizzoccaro
Ungar
Karnimura
Bertagna et aI.
(Continued)
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Jul. 7, 2011
(51)
Int. Cl.
HOlB 11106
(2006.01)
U.S. Cl.
USPC ...................................... 174/36; 174/DIG. 11
Field of Classification Search
USPC ............... 1741110 R, 115, 116, 117 R, 117 F,
1741117 FF, 114 S, 112,36
See application file for complete search history.
(Continued)
2,313,234 A
2,585,054 A
2,896,217 A
ABSTRACT
References Cited
(56)
2/1966
9/1966
4/1969
7/1969
4/1970
9/1973
5/1974
5/1974
7/1979
9/1983
10/1983
5/1986
(58)
S
A
A
A
A
(Continued)
Nov. 8, 2010
(65)
Patent No.:
US 8,455,758 B2
Date of Patent:
Jun. 4,2013
0203,677
3,272,926
3,441,951
3,454,964
3,505,684
0228,352
0231,613
3,810,525
4,160,306
0270,634
4,409,442
4,588,868
(21)
(52)
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOO8455758B2
174/120 SR
174/36
20b
100~
908
900
904
902
906
908
90
EXHIBIT 2
A
S
A
S
S
A *
S
S
A *
A
A
A *
S
A *
A *
A
A
A
A
S
S
S
A *
Bl *
Bl
B2
B2 *
S
S
S
B2
Bl *
B2
S
Bl
B2
S
S
S
S
S
B2
S
S
S
S
S
B2
S
S
S
S
B2 *
211989
511989
511989
811992
711993
1011994
1211994
1211994
211995
411995
411995
911995
311998
511998
111999
511999
911999
911999
1211999
212000
8/2000
10/2000
10/2000
1112001
4/2002
1112002
112003
212003
7/2003
6/2004
1212004
612005
912005
112006
7/2006
212007
3/2007
4/2007
7/2007
8/2007
8/2007
8/2007
5/2008
7/2008
7/2008
1012008
1112008
1112008
212009
212009
3/2009
3/2009
3/2009
Burger et al.
Besasie et al.
Kakiuchi et al.
Daido et al.
Yamazaki et al.
174/36
Plununer, III .
Wada
Nakamura
174/36
Plununer, III .
Nageno et al.
Britt
Lee
139/383 A
Nakamura
Wang et al .................... 3811300
174/136
Bickersteth et al.
Howard
DeFiorio
Fatato et al.
Wingate
Suzuki
Roman
Yoneda
Perkins .................... 3611679.03
Kamijo .................... 3611679.03
MacDonald, Jr. et al.
Hashimoto et al.
Peterson, III ............ 3611679.03
Andre et al.
Bergeron et al.
Green
Jordan
174111 0 R
Bradford .
Cao
Wilson et al.
Symons
Matsuda
Taylor et al.
Taylor et al.
Kim
Suzuki
Sutton
Gustavsson
Chung et al.
Gondo et al.
Huynh
Ando
Lee
Farhadian
Lee
Lee
Kurihara
Andre et al.
Chen et al.
174/36
D591,264 S
4/2009 Hong et al.
D594,847 S
6/2009 Suzuki
D596,690 S
7/2009 Bennett
8/2009 Matsuda et al.
D598,0 10 S
912009 Ando
D599,778 S
D603,370 S
1112009 Suzuki
D605,628 S
1212009 Ando
112010 Pedersen, II
D607,875 S
D614,168 S
4/2010 Rogers et al.
D637,756S
5/2011 Okanoetal.
D637,999 S
5/2011 Brunner et al.
6/2011 Horibe et al.
D639,775 S
D642,554 S
8/2011 Schaal et al.
8/2011 Leeetai.
D643,414 S
D649,956 S
1212011 Gresko et al.
112012 Groset et al.
D652,407 S
8,107,653 B2
112012 Wolfe
4/2012 Wescott
8,147,270 Bl
D662,080 S
6/2012 Carr et al.
912012 Scifo et al.
8,269,110 B2
8,269,111 B2
912012 Scifo et al.
2005/0069147 Al * 3/2005 Pedersen ......................... 381174
2005/0098594 Al
5/2005 Truong
2005/0123164 Al
6/2005 Yao et al.
2006/0166720 Al
7/2006 Dixon
2006/0185873 Al
8/2006 Johnson
2007/0081690 Al
4/2007 Stagni et al.
2008/0099229 Al * 5/2008 Scifo et al.
174/117 R
7/2011 Groset et al.
201110162883 Al
1509062
07-115022
2004056636
2004-211225
2006-527934
3132983
WO 2004/112359
WO-2009030578
Al
A
A
A
A
U
Al
212005
5/1995
212004
7/2004
1212006
612007
1212004
312009
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
"Yi Zip Earphones by Ji Woong", retrieved from the Internet on Mar.
<http://www.yankodesign.coml2009/04/22/zip-up20,
2012,
tangles/>.
.
"Yi Sound Concept Brings the Hot Jean-Crotch Aesthetic to
Earbuds", retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 5, 2012, <http://
gizmodo.comlzipper-earbuds/>.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28,
2012, for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/uS20 1110 5963 7.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Nov. 2, 2012, for Japanese
Patent Application No. 2011-241549.
* cited by examiner
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
Sheet 1 of 14
US 8,455,758 B2
20b
100~
80b~
20a
Fig. 1
90
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Jun. 4, 2013
110a
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 2 of 14
120b
130
130b
140b
140a
FIG.2
80b
FIG. 3
EXHIBIT 2
110b
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 3 of 14
o
o
C'0
j
...0
co
o
...--
co
o
N
C'0
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 4 of 14
co
o
I.{)
.til
u:
lO
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 5 of 14
510b
500\...
540a
540b
~-540b
540a
510a
510a
Fig. 6a
510a
510b
Fig. 6b
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 6 of 14
610b
610a
610b
610a
J600
660a
600~
610b
Fig. 7a
Fig. 7b
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
Sheet 7 of 14
US 8,455,758 B2
610a
10b
10a
660a
600
BOb
Fig. 8
Fig. 7c
610b 610a
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
Sheet 8 of 14
0)
EXHIBIT 2
US 8,455,758 B2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 9 of 14
210a
80a
11a
13~
10a
Fig. 10
40b
Fig. 11
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 10 of 14
702
704
Fig. 12
704
80b
80b
706
40a
40b
40b
80b
80b
80a
Fig. 14
Fig. 13
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
Sheet 11 of 14
Fig. 15
US 8,455,758 B2
Fig. 16
EXHIBIT 2
80a
80b
1010
7Jl
80b
1004b
1004a
2-
...
....
(.H
EXHIBIT 2
rFJ
40a
=....
o....
....
('D
('D
.....
...
708~
Fig. 17
d
rJl
1004a
QO
~
tit
tit
tit
QO
=
N
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
40b
US 8,455,758 B2
Sheet 13 of 14
1010
80b
80a
40a
Fig. 18
EXHIBIT 2
u.s. Patent
Juo. 4, 2013
Sheet 14 of 14
US 8,455,758 B2
80a
904
908
902
-""1--L.J
908
FIG. 19
EXHIBIT 2
thermo-resistant material; and (b) affixing means for releasable attachment on the outer layers of the first and second
wires, such that the outer layers canreleasably attach with one
another.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATIONS
15
20
BACKGROUND
Multiple electronic devices are designed to be used with a
plurality of connecting wires and cables. Common examples
include audio or video players that have a headphone jack, or
have ports for speaker wires. A common problem for users is
that these cables often become entangled with each other. For
example, left and right headphone wires readily become
intertwined and knotted, especially in ear bud style headphones. Additionally, stereo speaker wires usually are configured in pairs and can also become entangled with themselves or other wires.
There have been prior attempts to resolve this issue. European Patent Application 1509062 Al to Fung (hereinafter
"Fung") discloses a sliding mechanism that is integrated
directly into the cables, see FIGS. 2a-2c and Paragraph
[0006]. More specifically Fung is directed to engagement
means that can be molded together with the insulation layer of
the cords. In practice this strategy is limiting in that it makes
it difficult to incorporate different styles, types, and colors of
releasable fasteners. While mentioning the incorporation of
zipper like arrangements on the two cords, Fung is silent as to
how to do this in an advantageous way. The practical implementation of zippered cables assemblies involves overcoming many manufacturing problems, none of which are
addressed by Fung. For example, the manufacture of zippered
cables involves elevated temperature and stress during fabrication. Accordingly, there is a need for improved cable management systems and methods of making the same. Materials
and fabrication techniques are disclosed herein to overcome
these problems.
It is thus one embodiment herein to provide cable assemblies that include means for preventing entanglement and
easily allow the incorporation of a zipper or other releasable
connection means to the cables.
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
SUMMARY
According to preferred embodiments, the teachings herein
are directed to cable assemblies comprising a first and second
wire individually encapsulated in an outer layer comprising a
thermo-resistant material, wherein the first and second outer
layers each comprise means for releasably attaching with
each other.
Further embodiments are directed to methods of making
cable assemblies comprising: (a) providing a first and second
wire individually encapsulated in an outer layer comprising a
65
EXHIBIT 2
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
EXHIBIT 2
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
EXHIBIT 2
polyetherimide (PEl), polyether ether ketone (PEEK) Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) can be used as a diaphragm
material.
In certain non-preferred embodiments, the ear buds can be
only water proof and the clothing article can include instructions not to machine dry, for example. Thus a user could wash
their clothing article with the incorporated water proof ear
buds and then hang it out to dry as opposed to subjecting it to
the heat associated with a clothes dryer.
An additional non-zippered cable assembly 400, such as
shown in FIG. S, is directed to the use of multiple small
complementary magnets 250a and 250b spaced in intervals
along the cables SOa and SOb that can allow the cables SOa and
SOb to connect with each other and release. Magnets 250a and
250b can be incorporated into an over-mold material 60a and
60b such that they extend out from the molding, positioned
outside the over-mold material 60a and 60b or be used
directly on the cables themselves.
Expandable Cable Management Systems
According to additional embodiments, the cable management systems herein are not necessarily used with earphone
wires and can be used to prevent entanglement of additional
type of cables. FIGS. 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b, and 7c depict cable
management systems that can compress and lengthen two or
more wires. These assemblies are useful to prevent entanglement of speaker wires, AIV wires, gaming wires, computer
wires, and the like. These assemblies can also be used to
baby-proofhousehold wires and to otherwise prevent general
disorganization of wires.
FIGS. 6a and 6b depict a cable management assembly 500
that can expand to twice its compressed length, or substantially so. FIG. 6a shows the assembly 500 in a compressed
state and having two internal channels 540a and 540b each
configured to hold at least 1 wire 510a and SlOb. Alternatively, the assembly can include 1,2,3,4,5, or more channels
wherein each is configured to house at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or
more wires. A track 550 having means for releasable attachment can divide the two halves of the assembly 500. As one
embodiment a zipper track can be used that can be opened and
closed via zipper tab 50. Alternatively light magnets, or other
releasable means can be used to divide the two halves of the
assembly 500. The assembly is preferably made of a flexible
material such as rubber or fabric, such that the two halves can
be folded upon each other and releasably couple. FIG. 6b
depicts the assembly 500 in an expanded, longer configuration. When the means for releasable attachment are released
(e.g., the zipper track is unzipped) the assembly 500 is
allowed to straighten out to be twice as long as the compressed configuration.
Similarly FIGS. 7a, 7b, and 7c depict a cable management
assembly 600 that can expand to 3 times its size from a
compressed form. FIG. 7a depicts a compressed assembly
600 separated into 3 similarly or equally sized sections
wherein each section is divided by a track 640a and 640b
having means for releasable attachment. More specifically
the first track 640a divides the first and second sections, while
the second track 640b divides the second and third sections of
the assembly 600. As one embodiment zipper tracks can be
used for the tracks 640a and 640b and can be opened and
closed via zipper tabs 50a and SOb. Alternatively light magnets, or other releasable means can be used to divide the three
sections of the assembly 600. The assembly 600 includes two
internal channels 660a and 660b each configured to hold at
least 1 wire 610a and 610b. Alternatively, the assembly 600
can include 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more channels wherein each is
configured to house at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more wires. The
assembly 600 is preferably made of a flexible material such as
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
EXHIBIT 2
10
8. The cable assembly of claim 1, wherein the cable assembly further includes a stop to help stop a zipper slider from
sliding off the bottom of the zipper teeth, wherein the stop is
attached to the first electrical wire and the second electrical
wIre.
9. A method of making a cable assembly comprising:
providing a first electrical wire and a second electrical wire
that are individually encapsulated by injection molding,
an outer layer comprising a thermo-resistant material
outside the first electrical wire and the second electrical
wire;
an affixing apparatus for releasable attachment on the outer
layers of the first electrical wire and the second electrical
wire, such that the outer layers canreleasably attach with
one another; and
one or more reinforcement fibers positioned within the
injection molding individually encapsulating the first
electrical wire and the second electrical wire.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the cable assembly is
a headphone assembly and the first and second wires are
configured to transmit audio sound from a jack to headphones.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the thermo-resistant
material comprises at least one of draw textured yam and
braided nylon.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the cable assembly
can withstand up to 15 kg of torque from the jack to the
headphones.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein a volume control is
attached to at least one of the first electrical wire and the
second electrical wire.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein the affixing apparatus
comprises a thermoplastic zipper.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein a stop used to stop a
zipper slider from sliding off the bottom of the zipper,
wherein the stop is attached to both the first and second
electrical wires.
16. The method of claim 9, wherein the first and second
wires are individually encapsulated in an inner layer having
thermo-resistant and elastomeric properties positioned
underneath the outer layer.
17. The method of claim 9, wherein the one or more reinforcement fibers comprise at least one of an aramid and Kevlar.
18. A cable assembly comprising:
a first electrical wire;
a second electrical wire;
a thermo-resistant material that is molded around the first
electrical wire and around the second electrical wire;
zipper teeth that are molded to the thermo-resistant material of the first electrical wire and the second electrical
wire;
the zipper teeth molded to the first electrical wire being
releasably attached to the zipper teeth molded to the
second electrical wire via a zipper slider;
at least two reinforcing fibers comprising a first reinforcing
fiber and a second reinforcing fiber, the first reinforcing
fiber being encapsulated with the first electrical wire, the
second reinforcing fiber being encapsulated with the
second electrical wire; and
a stop used to stop the zipper slider from sliding off a
bottom of the zipper teeth, the stop being attached to the
first electrical wire and the second electrical wire,
wherein the cable assembly is a headphone assembly,
and the first electrical wire and the second electrical wire
are configured to transmit audio sound from a jack to
headphones.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
EXHIBIT 2
12
* * * * *
EXHIBIT 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 3
Zipbuds
Reg. No. 4,115,616
Registered Mar. 20, 2012
Int. Cl.: 9
FOR: AUDIO HEADPHONES, IN CLASS 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 AND 38).
TRADEMARK
PRINCIPAL REGISTER
THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY PARTICULAR FONT, STYLE, SIZE, OR COLOR.
SN 85-056,643, FILED 6-7-2010.
HOWARD B. LEVINE, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT 3