Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
System Survey
IMI WHITE PAPER SERIES
Contents
Executive Summary 2
Summary 6
Although full demographic information on respondents is not available, the results are inclusive
of 380 complete responses from a diverse set of industries, job titles, and size of companies.
Executive Summary
The vast majority of respondents to our survey (69% of total respondents) have no plans to
execute an XML strategy.
Exhibit One: Is your company committed to an XML strategy for your CMS initiative?
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5 Yes
0.4
0.3 No
0.2
0.1
0
XML
The implication of these findings may have some relation to the drop off in IT spending over the
past five years while users rationalize further IT spending more closely. Specific to content
management, the slow adoption of XML is likely the result of organizations that have realized
information is a key asset, but are struggling to find a solution that optimizes the creation and
retrieval of information, is interoperable with other systems, but does not require major
customization.
Issues that currently prevent organizations from utilizing XML to bridge the gap between their
current information systems and implementing an XML CMS include:
An interesting finding and analysis relates to the third of respondents that do have XML CMS
implementations in place. Why are they the contrarians? Despite the obstacles to adoption,
companies are adding XML to their IT options for several reasons including:
As mentioned above, organizations that have XML plans in progress are either highly regulated
or compliance driven businesses. Others have been early adopters because they came to the
realization that in order for the true potential of their information assets to be utilized as a key
asset they needed a fully defined Information Architecture strategy. XML is the backbone to
that strategy because it lends itself to
Current
3-6 mo's
6-12 mo's
12+ m o's
No plans
Further analysis shows that of those current projects, 44% of the respondents, indicated that
regulatory and compliance issues were extremely important to their CMS implementations.
These respondents were primarily in highly regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals,
healthcare and communications.
The first exhibit above includes a majority of our respondents with no plans to implement XML.
It is therefore interesting to tabulate that finding with the next question in the survey (How will
you manage your CMS?) and find a possible reason for this. The majority of those surveyed
(70%) indicated that their in-house resources would manage the CMS systems and 26% would
utilize a combination of in-house and outsourced services. Since the talent pool of XML
programmers is low and the available tools complex, it is reasonable to collate these responses
into the opinion that organizations that are not adopting CMS and XML may be doing so in
order to wait out the market until complexity is reduced and talent is available.
In house
Outsource
Combination
When asked what was or will be the biggest obstacle to achieving success with an enterprise
CMS, 30% of those surveyed said that justification of the cost of the CMS to senior management
followed by a concern for a rapid deployment throughout the organization were the main
concerns. Developing a strong ROI case is a major factor and can be a major obstacle to CMS
implementations.
Factors that were less potent obstacles were document conversion, integration with other
corporate CMS products and the cost of XML programmers or authors.
100%
The primary applications for CMS projects were regulatory and compliance documents and
corporate policies and procedures followed by Web, intranet and portal content and knowledge
management/collaboration. Heavily regulated and compliance centric organizations were the
leading and the earliest adopters of CMS that incorporated XML. Other organizations that did
not have significant external bodies breathing down their neck with regulations were less likely
to be in the process of implementing XML.
Graph represents the actual number of responses per application, rating the relative importance
of each application from not important to very important.
100%
Knowledge Management
80%
Product/Corp Literature
60%
Policy, Proceduces
40% Regulatory, com pliance
The internal and external groups that had the most influence on recommending a CMS product
were:
As XML standards evolve, and the pool of XML programmers expands, the adoption of XML in
CMS will increase.