Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
353
T.N. Silva
Teixeira Duarte, Lda, Lisbon, Portugal
ABSTRACT: Two different types of pedestrian bridges, representative of the Portuguese stock,
were selected, one in steel and the other in RC, for pedestrian and seismic loading after a large
campaign of in-situ measurements of natural frequencies, damping and amplitude levels. In that
campaign we observed that reinforced concrete (RC) structures, for the same spans and the
same loads, presented higher frequencies and lower amplitudes than steel structures. The two
structures were subjected to dynamic testing produced by different pedestrian loading, simulating current practical situations, from walking to running. In-situ measurements were made and
results compared with analytical detailing modeling. The models, in the linear range, subjected
to loads similar to the ones of the testing, reproduced with reasonable similarity the pattern of
the measured vibrations, being quite adequate for this type of loading. We also computed the
seismic response of both bridges in order to check their level of safety.
1 INTRODUCTION
The need for a great development of pedestrian bridges in Portugal is related to the large amount
of freeways or motorways constructed in recent years crossing urban areas. Pedestrian bridges
are in general quite different from viaducts over freeways not only due to differences in the
loading but also because the former can enjoy better the advances in material developments and
architectural creativity. In general they are lighter, built with high strength materials, spanning
larger distances and having a wide variety of structural designs. They tend to become slender
structures with less mass but they show more pronounced dynamic effects due to possible resonant consequences in the passage of pedestrians. Large vibration amplitudes are in the range of
discomfort and so the phenomenon deserves attention in order to understand the problems that
may arise and the way they should be dealt with.
For a number of years we have been building a Data-base on the main dynamic characteristics of different types of pedestrian bridges built in Portugal (Oliveira, 1997 and 2004). However, not many analytical studies were made for these types of structures in order to verify the
reliability of standard structural analysis programs to obtain their correct representation through,
at least, the frequencies of vibration (Caetano and Cunha, 2004) and the response for pedestrian
loading. Silva (2005) has studied two different pedestrian bridges, representative of the most
common steel and reinforced concrete types existing in Portugal, for frequency and pedestrian
crossing loading comparisons with in-situ measurements. He also subjected these structures to
the seismic action corresponding to the Portuguese Code (RSA, 1983).
2 MAIN TYPES OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES IN PORTUGAL
This study reports on 2 out of 43 pedestrian bridges of several geometric layouts, structural types,
deck cross-sections, materials and spanning distances varying from 12 m to 74 m, Figure 1. The
354
EVACES07
most common cases are the steel viaducts with box-girder decks and the pre-cast reinforced concrete (RC) viaducts with pre-stressed beams. Besides the steel and RC materials, fibre-glass is also
used. Figure 2 presents a classification of the main structural deck types.
On top of the several above mentioned variations, there are a few other factors that influence
the overall behaviour of these structures, namely the number of spans and the type of connections, the lateral pathway (ramp, stairways in the longitudinal or transversal directions), the
height, and the width or the curvature of the bridge axis, in elevation and plan.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
Number
40
50
A Data-base was built with the main following parameters: 1) Identification; 2) Location; 3)
Year of construction; 4) Structural type; 5) Span; 6) Height; 7) Width; 8) Lateral access; 9) Designer/contractor; 10) State of conservation; 11) Frequencies of 1st and 2nd vertical, transversal,
longitudinal modal shapes; 12) Amplitudes of vibration for 1 pedestrian walking at normal
speed. For most cases, GIS information is used with the location, a photo and a sketch.
Frequencies of vibration were obtained from in-situ experimental measurements as will be
explained in section 3.2 and main results are presented in Figures 3 a), b) and c), where the frequencies of first mode in the vertical, transversal and longitudinal directions are shown. Pedestrian bridges were grouped into three classes, Steel box-girders pedestrian structures, RC structures and Truss structures, and a power curve fitting on the span length (L) (y=aL ) was essayed
for the frequency of the first vertical mode, for each typology class. As it could be expected, the
correlation for the Steel box-girders are much higher than for RC beams and the equation values
resemble the bridge pattern as a whole. However, for Truss structures, the existing variety, with 2D, 3-D, steel, fiber-glass, etc. cases, is so large that no correlation can be observed. A more detailed classification, entering with other parameters, namely the material and the location of stairways, would certainly increase the correlation of frequency with length.
For all these structures, damping is quite small with values well below <0.5%, even for large
amplitude motions.
355
.
10
-1,1025
y = 135,71x
Freq (Hz)
Ftrans
R = 0,6794
Flong
Fvert
Pow er
(Fvert)
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Free Span (m)
60
70
80
a) Steel box-girders
Freq (Hz)
10
-1,29
y = 232,61x
2
R = 0,4747
8
6
Transv
Long
Vert
Power
(Vert)
2
0
15
20
25
Free Span (m)
30
35
b) RC beams
10
-0,1117
y = 5,5271x
Freq (Hz)
Transv
R = 0,0055
Long
Vert
Pow er
(Vert)
2
0
20
30
40
50
c) Truss structures
Figure 3. Frequencies of 1st mode (in three directions) as function of free span: a) for steel box-girders pedestrian structures; b) for RC structures; and c) for Truss structures and others.
Total
1,4 2,4
1,9 3,3
1,3 3,4
356
EVACES07
The second is related to the contact form of the foot with the deck, with three components,
the vertical and two horizontal. This contact form depends on the pattern of type of movement
in consideration, Figure 4 (Vinagre, 1989).
These functions were programmed in such a way they can be used with standard dynamic
analysis software (see Figure 5 for the vertical loading). For the longitudinal direction the intensity of loading is 50% of vertical while in the transverse direction is between 3 and 10%, both
with a frequency half of the vertical frequency (Wilftord, 2002 and Briseghella et al., 2002).
These patterns are also observed in the Data-base that was created by Oliveira (2004) and augmented in recent years.
357
tical and 1-2%g in horizontal, or as a function of bridge frequency, Figure 6 a). If the criterion is
separation of resonant conditions (Stoyanoff, 2002), the recommendations are as shown in Figure 6 b).
a)
b)
Figure 6. a) Allowable vertical accelerations as function of frequency of vertical mode (Stoyanoff, et al.,
2002); b) frequencies to be avoided (Bachmann, 2002 and Briseghella et al., 2002).
5 DYNAMIC MODELING
5.1 Steel box-girder
This structure, with 2.0 m wide and spanning 25.5 m at a height of 5.2 m, has a steel box-girder
deck supported in two cylindrical partially hollow columns and connected to 2 adjacent stairways, one at each side of the deck (Figure 7). The main geometric characteristics of deck cross
section are the trapezoidal shape with 65 cm height and the columns with =29.5 cm and thickness=1.4 cm, filled up with concrete almost to the top.
a)
b)
Figure 7. Steel structure under study: a) analytical model; b) view of column, deck and stairway.
The analytical model of this pedestrian bridge, including the stairways, was made with
SAP2000, using both beam and plate elements (Figure 7). In Table 2 a comparison of frequencies between the analytical and the measured values is made. With the exception of torsion
modes (which require the use of more than one instrument), the agreement is very good, also for
higher frequency modes.
Table 2. Comparison of frequencies from in-situ measurements and analytical model
Frequency
Measurements in situ
Analytical Model
Longitudinal
2,54 Hz
2,55 Hz
Vertical
3,42 a 3,52 Hz
3,52 Hz
Torsion about x
?
5,27 Hz
Torsion about z
?
5,74 Hz
Transversal
6,74 a 6,84 Hz
6,38 Hz
358
EVACES07
This structure was also subjected to a set of experimental testing to determine the peak amplitude of motion (amax) for different situations as defined in Table 1. Table3 presents the results for
the three orthogonal directions and marks the values above the recommended limits according to
several Codes. It is clear that in many instances the limits of discomfort are widely exceeded.
Table 3. Peak acceleration amplitudes for different tests. In bold are marked the values of vertical accelerations exceeding the less stringent limit (93,8mg); in italic the most stringent limit (66,7mg); in italic the
code values for horizontal (20mg, EN 1990)
amax (mg)
Vertical Longitudinal
Transversal
18,9
2,7
3,8
1 Person* walk at 1,8 Hz
29,1
5,2
6,1
1 Person walk at 2,2 Hz
38,2
20,2
12,1
1 Person jogging at 2,5 Hz
251,3
16,5
21,4
1 Person jogging at f=3,3 Hz
252,6
12,5
24,5
1 Person jogging at f=3,7 Hz
26,3
6,4
5,8
2 Person walk at f=1,7 Hz
38,3
25,3
7,0
2 Person walk at f=2,1 Hz
74,4
28,9
19,0
2 Person jogging at f=2,25 Hz
71,5
29,1
14,1
3 Person walk at f=2,1 Hz
16,3
6,2
10,3
7 or 8 kids (30 to 40 kg) slow walk
6,8
0,9
2,6
Free vibration
198,1
21,1
83,4
Jump
27,9
3,2
15,5
Forced vibration in transversal direction
39,8
3,8
17,0
Impulse in transversal direction
239,2
11,7
16,1
Forced vibration in vertical direction
* 74 kg
Figure 8 tests the feasibility of the model to reproduce the walking of a person at different
speeds, by comparing the peak acceleration amplitudes obtained in the model with the measurement in-situ. Even though difficulties arise in controlling the experimental testing (correct speed,
frequency of walking), results show a very good agreement with the analytical model. These nice
results are not so good for the longitudinal and transversal directions due probably to the difficulty
in reproducing the pedestrian loading in those directions.
450
400
350
avert (mg)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1,8
2,2
2,4
2,6
2,8
3,2
3,4
3,6
3,8
f(Hz)
SAP2000
medies
Figure 8. Comparison of amplitudes at mid-span (vertical acceleration) from in-situ measurements and analytical model: one person walking at various speeds. (Steel box-girder)
5.2 RC structure
This structure spans 25.6 m at a height of approximately 5-6 m with 2.0 m wide, Figure 9. The
deck, formed by two pre-cast and prestressed I beams, h=1.23 m, is supported by two RC columns. Between the columns and the beams there are neoprene pads. The pavement is made of
RC plates, thickness 13 cm, supported on the lower flanges (Figure 9 b). The columns are of
359
rectangular cross-section with variable dimensions (Figure 9) having 1.400.45 m at the base
and 0.70.45 m at the top just below the opening up for the support of the deck.
Concrete is a B45.1 for the beams and B30.1 for the pre-cast elements (plates, columns and
stairways). Stairways run perpendicular to the bridge axis and are supported in square columns
at third heights.
a)
b)
c)
Figure 9. RC structure under study: a) analytical model; b) deck cross-section; c) view of column, deck and
stairway.
Similarly to what was done for the steel structure, we compare in Tables 4 and 5 analytical with
in-situ measurements for mode frequencies and for peak acceleration amplitudes. Figure 10 presents the comparison for walking situations.
From the analysis of Tables 4 and 5 and Figure 10 we can say that the analytical model reproduces quite well the measurements in-situ for both the frequencies and pedestrian loading. Comparing the RC structure with the Steel structure we see that the former is much more rigid with
peak values almost half to one third below the later, depending on the direction considered.
Table 4. Comparison of frequencies from in-situ measurements and analytical model
Mode direction
Measurements in situ
Analytical Model
Longitudinal
2,77 Hz
2,77 Hz
Vertical
3,79 Hz
3,34 Hz
Transversal
3,73 Hz
3,73 Hz
Torsion about z
?
5,71 Hz
Torsion about x
7,91 Hz
8,80 Hz
Table 5. Peak amplitudes for different tests. In italic are marked in the values exceeding the code limits
for horizontal vibration (20mg, EN-1990)
amx (mg)
Vertical
Longitudinal
Transversal
1 Person* walk at 2,0Hz
7,3
1,7
2,9
1 Person* walk at 2,2Hz
10,1
1,8
3,1
1 Person* walk at 2,5Hz
8,3
4,9
8,0
1 Person* walk at 2,6Hz
11,6
12,2
13,5
1 Person* walk at 3,0Hz
15,5
7,8
15,8
1 Person* walk at 3,7Hz
32,7
11,8
25,4
2 Jumps at mid-span
61,1
34,2
90,2
Impulse in Transversal direction
8,5
5,2
15,6
* 74 kg
6 SEISMIC BEHAVIOR
Both structures were subjected to a seismic load defined by the Portuguese code of actions (RSA,
1983). For the steel structure no problem was identified. But for the RC it was observed that the
critical zones were the base of columns and the connections beam-column. For the first zone the
360
EVACES07
collapse limit state surpasses in approximately 20% the Code values while preliminary results for
the neoprene distortion the values are slightly below the admissible limits.
80
70
60
avertical (mg)
50
40
30
20
10
0
1,8
2,2
2,4
2,6
2,8
3,2
3,4
3,6
3,8
f(Hz)
SAP2000
medies
Figure 10. Comparison of amplitudes at mid-span (vertical acceleration) from in-situ measurements and analytical model: one person walking at various speeds. (RC structure)
a)
b)
Figure 11. Sketch of possible location of stairways.
c)
d)
Several tests were made in order to understand the influence of the position of the stairways
in the main frequencies as well as in the peak amplitude of vibration with the passage of a single
person at different speeds. Table 6 presents the variations of predominant deck frequencies in
function of position of stairways.
Just looking at the vertical direction, changes in frequency values are already quite important, but the transversal are even more critical as it could be anticipated. Important differences
are also observed for the peak amplitudes, as can be seen in Figure 12.
As observed in the Figure 12, amplitudes at resonance are similar but peak at different frequencies. The situation is more critical for the transversal and longitudinal directions of vibrations.
8 CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
From the Data-base on pedestrian bridges in Portugal, which were classified into different typologies, two more representative types were selected for a detailed analysis for pedestrian dynamic
loadings and for seismic actions. The first type was a steel box-girder and the second a RC prefabricated structure made of 2-I girder beams with small plates filling the deck. These two structures
were subjected to expedite in-situ campaign for measuring vibration parameters under several pedestrian loading, mainly the modal frequencies, damping and amplitude of motion. Analytical lin-
361
ear modeling was developed with great detail including all resisting elements such as stairways
and deck lateral guards and results compared with values obtained experimentally.
Table 6. Influence of stairways position on the frequencies of deck vibration.
Stairway location
Right end
Right end
Left end
Longitudinal
Transversal
Longitudinal
FT = 2,28Hz
FT = 2,63 Hz
Ftorsion.z = 2,92 Hz
FV = 3,24 Hz
FV = 3,04 Hz
FL = 3,36 Hz
FL = 3,41Hz
Ftorsion.z = 3,44 Hz
Ftorsion.x = 5,10Hz
Ftorsion.x = 5,40 Hz
Transversal
FL = 2,28 Hz
Ftorsion.x = 3,31 Hz
FV = 3,47 Hz
Ftorsion.z = 3,59 Hz
FT = 5,31 Hz
500
450
400
350
avertical (mg)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1,8
2,2
2,4
2,6
2,8
3,2
3,4
3,6
3,8
f(Hz)
Longitudinal-Longitudinal
Transversal-Longitudinal
Transversal-Transversal
Figure 12. Comparison of peak amplitudes for 1-person walking at different speeds for three case of stairway position for vertical vibration.
As far as results are concerned, one can say that the modeling reproduces with great accuracy
the frequencies of the several modes. We should say, however, that the good matching was not
achieved in first hand. The simplifications introduced in the model of the first trials were too severe and had to be revised in order to attain the above mentioned matching. In relation to amplitudes, the results are not always so good especially for the RC structure. The difficulties in controlling with accuracy the experimental conditions, in what concerns the frequency of the
excitation and the intensity of the pedestrian steps are the main reasons for the deviations observed
between the analytical and the experimental results.
The localization and type of the stairways influences drastically the frequencies and modal
shapes of the structures and, consequently, the vibration levels.
In relation to the amplitude levels of vibration of the steel structure, the measured peak acceleration values are well above the limits defined in the international recommendations, especially
for the case of jogging. This aspect reconfirms the idea already stated in previous studies
(Oliveira, 2004) that the majority of the pedestrian bridges in Portugal and, in particular, in the
region of Lisbon, suffer of excessive amplitude of vibration. However, they do not represent any
danger for the seismic code action.
For the RC structure the situation is reversed. In relation to amplitude of vibration for pedestrian loading the levels are well contained within the limits of the international recommendations, causing a better sensation of comfort and structural safety, but, on the other hand, they do
not comply with the seismic code, surpassing sometimes in 20% (footings of columns) the code
limits.
As a final remark, we should say that: (i) the dynamic behavior of pedestrian bridges, as the
ones analyzed, is kept in the linear range under current loading; (ii) and standard structural
analysis programs, accepting the use of time histories at different points, proved to be in good
condition to reproduce the experimental observations.
362
EVACES07