Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Aims
Cardiac remodelling might be an important mechanism for aldosterone-mediated cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and
mortality. Previous studies relating aldosterone to left ventricular (LV) structure however revealed conflicting results.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Methods
We aimed to evaluate the relationship of serum aldosterone concentration (SAC) and aldosterone-to-renin ratio
(ARR) with echocardiographic parameters of LV remodelling in CV risk patients with preserved left ventricular ejecand results
tion fraction (LVEF). We studied 1575 participants (54.1% female) with CV risk factors and LVEF .50%
(61.7 + 6.1%). Of the total, 94.7% of patients had no overt heart failure. All patients underwent measurement of
SAC, ARR, and comprehensive echocardiographic analysis. Overall, multivariate adjusted analysis of covariance
(ANCOVA) showed a significant increase in LV mass (P 0.001), LV mass index (P 0.001), relative wall thickness
(P 0.011), and LV posterior wall thickness (P , 0.001) with increasing SAC. This overall association of SAC and LV
remodelling was driven by a statistic significant effect exclusively in women. In multivariate logistic regression analysis
higher SAC levels were independently related to concentric LV hypertrophy [odds ratio (OR; with 95% CI) by comparing SAC levels in the third gender-specific tertile with the first tertile: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.312.68; P 0.001]. Higher
SAC levels were positively related to concentric LVH in either sex. We observed no significant associations between
the ARR and echocardiographic parameters of LV remodelling.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Conclusion
Circulating aldosterone but not ARR levels are independently related to echocardiographic parameters of LV structure, particularly in women. Higher SAC however was related to concentric LVH in either sex. Our findings in a large
CV risk cohort with preserved LVEF indicate aldosterone-mediated pro-hypertrophic effects as a potential pathway
for structural alterations of the left ventricular myocardium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Keywords
Introduction
The adrenal hormone aldosterone regulates salt and water
homeostasis via binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)
in the kidney. Beside of the classical binding sites of aldosterone
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 551 3912100, Fax: +49 551 3913354, Email: fedelmann@med.uni-goettingen.de
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Page 2 of 10
Methods
Study characteristics
The ongoing, multi-centre observational trial DIAST-CHF on prevalence and clinical course of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and HF with
preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is part of the nationwide
German Competence Network Heart Failure project.11 Patients
(aged between 50 and 85 years) who revealed at least one risk
factor for DD or HFpEF (defined as history of arterial hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea syndrome, or atherosclerotic disease)
or a documented history of HF were prospectively included into the
DIAST-CHF study after reference to primary care physicians. Only
patients with an inability to participate or give written consent, i.e.
due to severe concomitant diseases or geographic reasons were not
included. For the present analyses, we excluded patients with systolic
dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ,50%] or with
atrial fibrillation. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was
diagnosed in accordance with recent ESC guidelines and with Framingham diagnostic criteria.12,13
The majority of 1935 patients (1728) who were included in
DIAST-CHF were from Goettingen and Berlin, Germany. Serum
Definition of covariates
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilogram divided by
height in meter squared. History of coronary heart disease (CHD),
hyperlipidaemia, current smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, history of cancer, and sleep apnea syndrome were evaluated at presentation through a patient provided
medical history. Detailed ongoing medication [ACE-inhibitors
(ACE-I), angiotensin-II type-1 receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers,
calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and statins] was recorded at baseline. In addition, only 14 participants (0.9%) took MR-blockers at baseline. Diabetes mellitus was defined according to the current
recommendations of the American Diabetes Association as fasting
glucose .7.0 mmol/L or 2 h glucose .11.1 mmol/L after performing
an oral glucose tolerance test.19 Arterial hypertension was defined
according to the JNC VII report (Seventh Report of the Joint National
Committee for Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of
Hypertension) as systolic/diastolic BP .140/90 mmHg and/or
ongoing intake of antihypertensive medication. Systolic and diastolic
BP was measured at baseline by experienced physicians under standardized conditions. The heart rate was recorded after resting via
F. Edelmann et al.
Page 3 of 10
Laboratory methods
Statistical methods
Results
Page 4 of 10
Table 1
F. Edelmann et al.
Variable
Tertile 1
(<164.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
Tertile 2
(164.8 224.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
Tertile 3
(>224.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
193.1 (179.4206.1)
16.5 (7.5 43.1)
P Trend
...............................................................................................................................................................................
SAC, pmol/L
PRC, mIU/mL
ARR, pmol/L/mIU/mL
Age, years
Female sex, %
0.001
15.9 (6.042.0)
,0.001
65.3 + 8.4
52.0
64.8 + 8.4
42.1
0.238
,0.001
28.7 + 5.0
28.8 + 4.8
28.7 + 4.6
0.880
124.8 + 33.6
56.6 + 16.6
127.1 + 32.1
53.2 + 17.0
125.9 + 31.5
53.2 + 15.7
0.483
0.016
39.8
39.8
36.8
0.311
Statin use, %
Current smokers, %
28.1
10.9
23.7
14.1
25.1
10.1
0.271
0.774
Alcohol abuse, %
10.5
12.5
15.8
0.693
9.1
5.1
7.0
5.7
7.4
6.5
0.303
0.355
History of cancer, %
Sleep apnea syndrome, %
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, %
7.2
8.2
5.3
0.224
Diabetes mellitusa, %
Arterial hypertension, %
22.7
77.1
24.8
77.3
21.9
79.2
0.770
0.413
147 + 21
147 + 21
146 + 23
0.520
82 + 12
66 + 10
84 + 12
67 + 11
84 + 12
67 + 12
0.046
0.170
History of CHD, %
15.6
14.1
15.4
0.931
36.7
16.5
37.9
14.6
39.8
15.9
0.301
0.778
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Antihypertensive treatment
ACE-inhibitors, %
ARBs, %
Beta-blockers, %
39.8
40.8
44.1
0.164
Calcium-channel blockers, %
Diuretics, %
17.7
36.2
17.1
44.4
18.8
46.7
0.648
0.001
0.2
2.7
,0.001
MR-blocker, %
...............................................................................................................................................................................
eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2
Serum sodium, mmol/L
Serum potassium, mmol/L
High sensitivity C-reactive protein, mg/L
Thyroid stimulating hormone, mU/mL
NT-proBNP, pg/mL
75.6 (64.588.1)
140.5 + 2.4
4.3 + 0.5
1.7 (0.8 4.1)
0.97 (0.621.47)
102.0 (57.3187.4)
74.7 (65.186.5)
140.5 + 2.4
4.3 + 0.5
1.7 (0.9 3.4)
71.4 (63.382.1)
140.3 + 2.7
4.4 + 0.7
1.6 (0.83.5)
1.01 (0.661.60)
82.4 (44.4154.7)
1.07 (0.731.54)
83.9 (43.2165.4)
0.018
0.397
0.119
0.685
0.170
0.005
...............................................................................................................................................................................
NYHA-classification, %
0.871
0
I
90.6
1.3
92.4
2.9
89.5
2.7
II
5.5
4.3
5.7
III
2.5
1.3
2.1
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Echocardiographic parameters
LV end-diastolic diameter, mm
48.2 + 5.5
49.0 + 5.6
49.0 + 5.7
0.032
LV end-systolic diameter, mm
29.9 + 5.3
30.5 + 5.4
30.4 + 5.5
0.182
LV end-diastolic volume, mL
LV end-systolic volume, mL
110.4 + 28.3
36.4 + 15.9
114.7 + 29.9
38.2 + 16.1
115.1 + 29.5
38.1 + 16.9
0.033
0.182
LV ejection fraction, %
61.6 + 6.2
61.8 + 6.2
61.5 + 6.1
Interventricular septum, mm
LV posterior wall, mm
12.0 (10.313.0)
10.9 + 1.6
12.0 (11.013.0)
11.3 + 1.7
12.0 (11.013.0)
11.4 + 1.7
,0.001
,0.001
LV mass, g
124.5 (85.5180.1)
146.8 (98.1205.4)
,0.001
109.4 + 24.3
116.9 + 25.9
116.7 + 26.6
,0.001
0.675
Continued
Hyperlipidaemia, %
Page 5 of 10
Table 1 Continued
Variable
Tertile 1
(<164.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
Tertile 2
(164.8 224.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
Tertile 3
(>224.8 pmol/L)
n 5 525
P Trend
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Relative wall thickness
0.46 + 0.1
0.47 + 0.1
0.47 + 0.1
0.046
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Patterns of LV-hypertrophy
Normal LV, %
,0.001
68.5
62.7
62.9
LV concentric remodelling, %
14.4
15.9
15.7
0.567
LV concentric hypertrophy, %
LV eccentric hypertrophy, %
4.2
12.9
4.4
16.9
5.5
15.9
0.377
0.308
None, %
20.2
18.1
23.2
Mild, %
Moderate, %
60.0
19.6
60.4
21.4
56.5
20.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
...............................................................................................................................................................................
DIAST-CHF grade of DDb
0.810
Values are given as mean with SD or as median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables, and percentage for categorical data. Group differences (P for trend) were
calculated by ANOVA for continuous and x2 test for categorical variables. Tertiles are from baseline serum aldosterone concentration.
SAC, serum aldosterone concentration; PRC, plasma renin concentration; ARR, aldosterone to renin ratio; CHD, coronary heart disease; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme;
MR blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor blocker; ARB, angiotensin-II type-1 receptor blocker; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration according to the MDRD (modification of diet
in renal disease) formula to estimate GFR; LV, left ventricular.
a
Diabetes was classified according to the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association; bDIAST-CHF grade of DD (Grade of diastolic dysfunction).
Table 2 Correlation coefficients between serum aldosterone levels, aldostereon-to-renin ratio levels, N-terminal pro
B-type brain natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular function and structure
Variables
Overall (n 5 1575)
Women (n 5 849)
Men (n 5 726)
....................................
....................................
....................................
SAC
SAC
SAC
ARR
ARR
ARR
...............................................................................................................................................................................
SAC
ARR
0.236**
NT-proBNP
20.085*
LV ejection fraction
LV mass
20.035
0.133**
0.132**
20.009
20.020
0.231**
20.067
20.004
0.076*
0.040
0.063
0.092**
0.257**
20.054
20.027
20.012
20.034
0.015
0.168**
0.010
20.017
LV mass index
0.109**
0.043
0.034
0.076
0.060*
20.027
0.075*
20.040
0.044
20.010
Interventricular septum
LV posterior wall
0.107**
0.125**
20.017
20.030
0.058
0.096**
20.071
20.033
0.050
0.038
0.067
20.018
LV end-diastolic diameter
0.061*
0.007
20.004
0.030
20.028
20.009
LV end-systolic diameter
LV end-diastolic volume
0.052*
0.060*
0.002
0.008
0.020
20.004
0.017
0.031
20.006
20.027
20.006
20.009
LV end-systolic volume
0.052*
0.003
20.021
0.019
20.006
20.006
SAC, serum aldosterone concentration; ARR, aldosterone-to-renin ratio; LV, left ventricular.
*P , 0.05; **P , 0.001.
Severe, %
Page 6 of 10
F. Edelmann et al.
Figure 1 (A C) Distribution of left ventricular mass, left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness values according to genderspecific tertiles of serum aldosterone concentration levels overall, in women and men, respectively (n 1575). Mean values for echocardiographic parameters of each ANCOVA-analysis are illustrated. ANCOVA models were adjusted for: age, gender, body mass index,
HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, serum sodium, serum potassium, N-terminal pro B-type brain natriuretic
peptide, detailed antihypertensive medication (ACE-inhibitor use, angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker use, beta-blocker use, calcium-channel
blocker use, diuretic use, and mineralocorticoid receptor-blocker use), statin use, eGFRMDRD, diabetes mellitus, history of coronary heart
disease, high sensitive C-reactive protein, current smoking status, thyroid stimulating hormone, alcohol abuse, heart rate, history of cancer,
history of sleep apnea syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and plasma renin concentration. *P , 0.05.
Page 7 of 10
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis relating plasma aldosterone levels (stratified in gender specific tertiles) to
abnormal geometric left ventricular patterns
LV
geometric
pattern
Overall
Women
Men
OR (95% CI) by
comparing SAC
gender-specific
tertile 3 with
tertile 1
OR (95% CI) by
comparing SAC
gender-specific
tertile 2 with
tertile 1
OR (95% CI) by
comparing SAC
gender-specific
tertile 3 with
tertile 1
OR (95% CI) by
comparing SAC
gender-specific
tertile 2 with
tertile 1
OR (95% CI) by
comparing SAC
gender-specific
tertile 3 with
tertile 1
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Concentric remodelling
Model 1
Model 2
1.01 (0.771.34)
1.02 (0.771.35)
1.05 (0.721.53)
1.04 (0.711.52)
1.04 (0.691.56)
1.05 (0.701.58)
Model 3
0.91 (0.651.24)
0.94 (0.581.52)
0.92 (0.561.51)
SAC per
log-SD
0.95 (0.781.15)
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Concentric hypertrophy
Model 1
Model 2
1.49 (1.102.02)
1.52 (1.122.07)
1.77 (1.17.2.67)
1.74 (1.152.63)
1.29 (0.822.01)
1.35 (0.862.11)
Model 3
1.63 (1.142.35)
1.62 (0.982.67)
1.72 (1.012.92)
SAC per
log-SD
1.22 (1.011.48)
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Eccentric hypertrophy
Model 1
Model 2
0.94 (0.671.32)
0.94 (0.671.32)
0.91 (0.551.52)
0.91 (0.551.52)
Model 3
1.08 (0.731.61)
0.93 (0.511.69)
0.64 (0.361.12)
SAC per
log-SD
0.89 (0.701.14)
Data represent odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) relating different pathological pattern of LV geometry to gender-specific tertiles of serum aldosterone
concentration (SAC in pmol/L) by comparing high SAC levels within the second and third gender-specific tertile, respectively with SAC levels within the first (reference)
gender-specific tertile. Model 1: crude. Model 2: age-adjusted; Model 3: multivariate adjusted (according to ANCOVA models (Figure 1)).
Additionally, odds ratios (with 95% CI) for 1 SD increment in log-SAC (derived from multivariate adjusted model 3) for each abnormal LV geometric pattern are shown.
ANVOCA models as stated above), patients in the highest genderspecific T of SAC were at a 1.9-fold increased risk of presenting
with a concentric LV hypertrophy (adjusted OR: 1.87, 95% CI:
1.31 2.68, P 0.001) compared with patients in the first genderspecific T of SAC. Gender-specific analysis revealed a significant
relation of higher SAC levels to increased risk of concentric LV
hypertrophy in both, women and men, respectively.
When SAC was evaluated as a continuous variable the association between SAC levels and concentric LV hypertrophy
remained highly significant (adjusted OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.06
1.40, per log SD increase in SAC levels, P 0.005). Furthermore,
these significant results did not materially change after exclusion of
76 (4.8%) participants, who were suggestive for primary aldosteronism (indicated by an ARR .35 pmol/L/mIU/mL and SAC
.300 pmol/L). The highest gender-specific T remained related
to a 1.7-fold increased risk of concentric LV hypertrophy compared with the first gender-specific T of SAC (P 0.012).
We found that the association between SAC and risk of concentric
LVH is modulated by gender distribution (P , 0.001), age (P ,
0.001), BMI (P 0.006), HDL-cholesterol (P 0.004), systolic BP
(P 0.006), serum sodium (P 0.006), NT-proBNP (P 0.003),
septum increased significantly from the first to the third genderspecific T of SAC (P , 0.001 for both).
Gender specific analyses revealed a significant association
between higher SAC levels and LV mass, LV mass index, relative
wall thickness and interventricular septum exclusively in women.
Left ventricular posterior wall thickness increased significantly
from the first (reference) gender-specific T of SAC to the third
T in both, men (P 0.046) and women (P 0.008), respectively.
Detailed multivariate adjusted analyses showed no significant
associations between ARR and echocardiographic parameters
(data not shown) overall and in either sex, respectively.
Left ventricular CR, concentric LV hypertrophy, and eccentric
LV hypertrophy were present in 30.5, 26.1, and 16.9% of the
study population. Table 3 shows the associations between higher
SAC levels and abnormal geometric LV patterns across the
whole cohort and stratified according to gender distribution
derived from logistic regression models. Across the whole
cohort and in gender-specific analysis, SAC levels in the highest
(third) gender-specific T were strong correlates of concentric LV
hypertrophy compared with the first (reference) T of SAC. After
multivariate adjustment (model 3; adjusted according to
Page 8 of 10
use of ACE-I (P 0.026), use of beta-blocker (P 0.013),
eGFRMDRD (P 0.001), and sleep apnea syndrome (P 0.006).
Overall, no significant association was seen for SAC and risk of
concentric LV remodelling and eccentric LV hypertrophy, respectively. Furthermore, no associations were found between ARR
levels and pathological patterns of LV geometry overall and in
either sex.
Discussion
F. Edelmann et al.
Page 9 of 10
Limitations
Findings regarding the association between circulating aldosterone
levels and echocardiographic LV structure should be treated with
caution. Since we did not measure structural parameters of the
right ventricle, no assumptions about the association of aldosterone and the right heart structure and geometry can be made.
Local extra-adrenal aldosterone synthesis, a complex cross-talk
between aldosterone and angiotensin II and the aldosteronecortisol interplay at MR-level might not be accurately reflected
by a one-time aldosterone measurement in serum or plasma. In
addition dietary salt intake has not been evaluated. Several other
factors, which have been shown to interfere with aldosterone
and renin levels, i.e. ongoing medication, might have confounded
our analysis.38 The determination of 24-h urinary aldosterone
excretion is superior to the measurement of serum/plasma aldosterone levels in estimating the integrated daily exposure to aldosterone.28 It is also important to stress that the cross-sectional
design of our analysis does not enable conclusions with regard
to causal relationships. However, the findings of our analyses in a
large sample of CV risk patients with preserved LV EF might be
extrapolated to a broader population within the related age class
and is strengthened by gender-specific analyses and the consideration of a panel of established confounders.
Conclusions
The association of unremarkable circulating aldosterone levels with
parameters of LV structure favours the notion of potential
aldosterone-mediated effects on the cardiovascular system in the
absence of primary aldosteronism. Mechanistic studies however
are warranted to elucidate both the permissive milieu and mechanisms beyond aldosterone-driven effects on the myocardium. Our
findings further support the idea that MR-blockade may delay or
prevent the occurrence of abnormal patterns in patients with preserved LV EF, which warrants further observational and interventional studies in this field.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry
of Education and Research (German Heart Failure Network), TP 7
(FKZ 01GI0205) and the German Diabetes Foundation.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
References
1. Young WF. Primary aldosteronism: renaissance of a syndrome. Clin Endocrinol
(Oxf) 2007;66:607618.
2. Ritz E, Tomaschitz A. Aldosterone, a vasculotoxic agentnovel functions for an
old hormone. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:2302 2305.
3. Tomaschitz A, Pilz S, Ritz E, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Pieber TR. Aldosterone and
arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:8393.
4. Tomaschitz A, Pilz S, Ritz E, Meinitzer A, Boehm BO, Marz W. Plasma aldosterone
levels are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: the Ludwigshafen
Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1237 1247.
5. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J.
The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe
heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J
Med 1999;341:709 717.
6. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, Bittman R, Hurley S,
Kleiman J, Gatlin M. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with
left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;348:
1309 1321.
7. Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, van Veldhuisen DJ, Swedberg K, Shi H, Vincent J,
Pocock SJ, Pitt B. Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med 2010;364:11 21.
8. Pitt B, Reichek N, Willenbrock R, Zannad F, Phillips RA, Roniker B, Kleiman J,
Krause S, Burns D, Williams GH. Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the 4E-left ventricular hypertrophy study. Circulation 2003;108:
1831 1838.
9. Vizzardi E, DAloia A, Giubbini R, Bordonali T, Bugatti S, Pezzali N, Romeo A, Dei
Cas A, Metra M, Dei Cas L. Effect of spironolactone on left ventricular ejection
fraction and volumes in patients with class I or II heart failure. Am J Cardiol
2010;106:1292 1296.
10. Brilla CG, Weber KT. Mineralocorticoid excess, dietary sodium, and myocardial
fibrosis. J Lab Clin Med 1992;120:893901.
11. Mehrhof F, Loffler M, Gelbrich G, Ozcelik C, Posch M, Hense HW, Keil U,
Scheffold T, Schunkert H, Angermann C, Ertl G, Jahns R, Pieske B, Wachter R,
Edelmann F, Wollert KC, Maisch B, Pankuweit S, Erbel R, Neumann T,
Herzog W, Katus H, Muller-Tasch T, Zugck C, Dungen HD, Regitz-Zagrosek V,
Lehmkuhl E, Stork S, Siebert U, Wasem J, Neumann A, Gohler A, Anker SD,
Kohler F, Mockel M, Osterziel KJ, Dietz R, Rauchhaus M. A network against
failing heartsintroducing the German Competence Network Heart Failure.
Int J Cardiol 2010;145:135 138.
12. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE,
Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I,
Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG,
Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement
on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction
by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European
Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2539 50.
13. McKee PA, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1441 1446.
14. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N.
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to
necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450 458.
15. Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, Anderson SJ, Stokes J III, Feinleib M,
Castelli WP. The spectrum of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population
sample: the Framingham Study. Circulation 1987;75:I26 I33.
16. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Pickering TG, Saba PS, Vargiu P,
Simongini I, Laragh JH. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric
remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1550 1558.
17. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA,
Waggoner AD, Flachskampf FA, Pellikka PA, Evangelista A. Recommendations
for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107 133.
Page 10 of 10
29. du Cailar G, Fesler P, Ribstein J, Mimran A. Dietary sodium, aldosterone, and left
ventricular mass changes during long-term inhibition of the renin-angiotensin
system. Hypertension 2010;56:865 870.
30. Pratt JH. Central role for ENaC in development of hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol
2005;16:3154 3159.
31. Weinberg EO, Thienelt CD, Katz SE, Bartunek J, Tajima M, Rohrbach S,
Douglas PS, Lorell BH. Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure
overload hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:264 273.
32. Kanashiro-Takeuchi RM, Heidecker B, Lamirault G, Dharamsi JW, Hare JM. Sexspecific impact of aldosterone receptor antagonism on ventricular remodeling
and gene expression after myocardial infarction. Clin Transl Sci 2009;2:134142.
33. Muscholl MW, Schunkert H, Muders F, Elsner D, Kuch B, Hense HW, Riegger GA.
Neurohormonal activity and left ventricular geometry in patients with essential
arterial hypertension. Am Heart J 1998;135:58 66.
34. Schunkert H, Hense HW, Muscholl M, Luchner A, Kurzinger S, Danser AH,
Riegger GA. Associations between circulating components of the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and left ventricular mass. Heart 1997;77:
24 31.
35. Taniguchi I, Kawai M, Date T, Yoshida S, Seki S, Taniguchi M, Shimizu M,
Mochizuki S. Effects of spironolactone during an angiotensin II receptor blocker
treatment on the left ventricular mass reduction in hypertensive patients with
concentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ J 2006;70:995 1000.
36. Choi EY, Ha JW, Yoon SJ, Shim CY, Seo HS, Park S, Ko YG, Kang SM, Choi D,
Rim SJ, Jang Y, Chung N. Increased plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio is associated
with impaired left ventricular longitudinal functional reserve in patients with
uncomplicated hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:251 256.
37. Velagaleti RS, Gona P, Levy D, Aragam J, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Lieb W,
Wang TJ, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS. Relations of biomarkers representing distinct
biological pathways to left ventricular geometry. Circulation 2008;118:
2252 2258, 2255p following 2258.
38. Tomaschitz A, Pilz S. Aldosterone to renin ratioa reliable screening tool for
primary aldosteronism? Horm Metab Res 2010;42:382 391.
39. Tomaschitz A, Pilz S, Ritz E, Morganti A, Grammer T, Amrein K, Boehm BO,
Marz W. Associations of plasma renin with 10-year cardiovascular mortality,
sudden cardiac death, and death due to heart failure. Eur Heart J 2011;
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr150.
40. Tomaschitz A, Marz W, Pilz S, Ritz E, Scharnagl H, Renner W, Boehm BO,
Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Weihrauch G, Dobnig H. Aldosterone/renin ratio determines peripheral and central blood pressure values over a broad range. J Am
Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2171 2180.
41. Edelmann F, Schmidt AG, Gelbrich G, Binder L, Herrmann-Lingen C, Halle M,
Hasenfuss G, Wachter R, Pieske B. Rationale and design of the aldosterone
receptor blockade in diastolic heart failure trial: a double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled, parallel group study to determine the effects of spironolactone on exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with symptomatic diastolic heart failure (Aldo-DHF). Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12:874 882.
F. Edelmann et al.