Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
9, SEPTEMBER 2007
3579
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. (a) Structures, (b) appearance, and (c) 3-D view of the rotating magnetic
stirrer.
3580
degrees. Now, the aim is to determine the corresponding magnetic fields and the total magnetic field.
Perpendicular component of the magnetic field of a piece
of wire like an arc of
degrees,
, is written by using
BiotSavart Law as
(2)
The magnetic field of a finite length straight wire at a perpendicular distance is calculated as
(3)
Fig. 3. Perpendicular component of the magnetic field of a piece of wire like
an arc of ' degrees.
Now substituting
obtained as
into (3),
can be
(4)
where
ponent of
which the coils are wound will act as N pole, and the other half as
S pole. Depending on the change in the supply voltage, currents
passing through the coils will continuously change. Angular velocity of the rotating magnetic field, , is the stirring revolution
of the magnet bar per minute and is given as
(5)
where
Since
(1)
where is the frequency of supply voltage and is the number
radian.
of the pole pair per
When the magnetic stir bar is subjected to such a rotating
magnetic field, it will rotate at the same speed with the angular
velocity of the magnetic field. It is certain that coping of the
magnetic bar with the rotational field also depends on the magnitude of the rotational kinetic energy gained. Therefore, if the
energy of the magnetic field is smaller than the rotational kinetic
energy, the bar cannot follow the rotating magnetic field, and is
driven away. The angular velocity of the magnetic bar in such a
field is limited. As seen in Fig. 3, the magnetic field which rotates the magnet bar at point D can be written as the sum of the
perpendicular component of the magnetic field of two current
carrying wires of length and a piece of wire like an arc of
(6)
Now, to calculate
, substituting
into (3),
is obtained as
(7)
3581
where
(12)
is the magnetic momentum of the stir bar [8]. In (12),
is the
magnetic flux density of the stir bar. The torque, , attached to
the magnetic stir bar is calculated as
(13)
Rotating kinetic energy of the magnetic stir bar,
, is given as
(14)
D.
(15)
Then, substituting (15) into (14), kinetic energy is calculated as
where
dicular component of
(16)
In order for the magnetic bar not to be flung,
must
be satisfied. Then, for the magnetic bar to rotate without being
flung on the rotating magnetic stirrer and mass center axis, the
condition
(17)
(8)
In (8), since
follows:
is calculated as
(9)
, is
(10)
(19)
where is the radius of the coil wire, is the width, and is the
depth of the slot. When we place the magnetic stir bar in such a
field, it will be in the same direction with the field, influenced by
the magnetic torque. In the rotating magnetic stirring system, the
magnetic stir bar moves with an angle of
radian following
the field.
The magnitude of the energy,
, of the magnetic stir bar
caused by the total magnetic field, is given in [8] as
(11)
3582
TABLE I
MEASURED AND CALCULATED ANGULAR VELOCITIES FOR DIFFERENT VALUES OF k AND THE TYPE OF THE STIR BAR
TABLE II
PARAMETER SET OF THE MAGNETIC STIR BAR FOR k = 4 WHICH HAS THE OPTIMUM SOLUTION
TABLE III
CALCULATED TORQUE AND ENERGY VALUES OF THE MAGNETIC STIR BARS
3583
Fig. 6. (a) Control unit. (b) Power supply circuit scheme for a phase.
is calculated. Therefore
(22)
ms
3584
TABLE IV
ROTATION SPEEDS REGARDING THE SIZES OF STIR BARS
Fig. 9. (a) Experiment in prototype with the small bar. (b) Power supply and
control unit.
experiment with the small bar, and Fig. 9(b) is the power supply
and the control unit. At the end of the experiments, maximum
speed limits are measured as 583 rpm for Type 3 bar, 1125 rpm
for Type 2, and 2207 rpm for Type 1. These results concur with
the theoretical values obtained mathematically in Table I. Experimental results also show that the measured speed limits are at
most 207 rpm above the maximum speeds guaranteed, given in
Table IV. Furthermore, the change in the values of power consumption according to the magnetic bar size and revolution is
measured. The graph of this change is in Fig. 10.
As seen in Fig. 10, for each bar, as the rotation of the bar
increases, the power drawn shows a linear increase at low revolutions, but reveals little change as the revolution increases. The
reason for the power drawn to have a linear increase at low revolution is that all of the water in the beaker does not rotate at the
same time, but the amount of the water rotating in the beaker
increases linearly as the revolution increases. That is because
the power drawn is directly proportional to the amount of the
water turning with the stir bar. Then, looking at Fig. 10, it can
be said that all of the 800 ml water in the beaker rotates approximately over 400 rpm for all bar types. As for the reason
Fig. 10. Change in power consumption with respect to the size of the bar and
rotation.
for the power drawn to remain almost constant as the revolution of the bar increases more, it is because all the water in the
beaker stirs. It is also seen in Fig. 10 that regardless of the size
of the bar, the power drawn with the same revolution does not
change at all over 400 rpm. The reason for this is that the bar
does not have a contribution, which can change the size of the
rotating magnetic field, and therefore, move in the same rotational field. In contrast, if the level of the magnetic field of the
bar is higher than the rotational field, an eddy current additional
to the current formed in the rotational field arises. Since the size
of this eddy current is determined by the size of the magnetic
field of the bar and therefore, the size of the bar itself, the power
drawn will be different. Then, two elements that will influence
the power drawn are decided to be the amount of the water and
power supply frequency. That is because as the amount and the
viscosity of the liquid (here, water) increases, the pressure put
on the unit surface of the bar increases. Furthermore, the value of
the rotating magnetic field, which provides the necessary torque
3585
for the stir bar to rotate, increases and consequently the current
and the power increase. On the other hand, as seen in Fig. 11,
as the frequency increases, the speed of rotation will rise and
so will the energy spent per time. This in turn means the power
value will rise.
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a mathematical model of a rotational magnetic
field for stirring liquids is proposed, and initial experimental results are presented. Design parameters of the stirrer are arranged
for a four-phase case to get the optimum results. The proposed
electromagnetic stirrer can be used in industry for stirring liquids with magnet rods following the rotating magnetic field.
In the system, in order to realize the stirring process seamlessly, it is suitable not to exceed the angular velocities of
2000 rpm for the small bar, 1000 rpm for the medium bar,
and 500 rpm for the big bar. Although the software developed
in our study ensures the rotating speeds of these values, it
has been experimentally observed that electromagnetic stirrer
can seamlessly work at most 63 rpm above these quantities.
Furthermore, the size of the bar used in the system to obtain
high angular velocity and the volume of the liquids to be
stirred must be kept as low as possible. In addition, viscosity
of the liquid decreases the angular velocity of the bar. Yet, if
operation at low revolution does not pose any drawback for the
user, bigger bars should be preferred, for more homogeneous
stirring. However, in the system designed, a PIC controlled
supply unit with a smaller physical dimension size is portable
compared to inverters. Moreover, the control unit produced
with the PIC microprocessor is expected to have a lower cost
than any traditional and commercial inverter. In conclusion,
the electromagnetic stirrer can effectively be used in industrial
applications due to its low cost, smaller physical dimension,
Manuscript received April 26, 2007; revised June 18, 2007. Corresponding
author: O. Kalender (e-mail: okalender@kho.edu.tr).
Osman Kalender received the B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Department
of Electrical Education, Technical Education Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara,
Turkey, in 1986 and 2005, respectively.
He is currently working for the Department of Technical Sciences, Turkish
Military Academy, Ankara. His research interests are generalized electrical machinery, power electronics, and magnetism.
Yavuz Ege received the B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Physics
Education, Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balikesir University, Balikesir,
Turkey, in 1995 and 2005, respectively.
He is currently working for the Department of Physics Education, Balikesir
University. His research interests are solid physics, magnetism, and power
electronics.