Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DOI 10.1007/s00449-016-1603-z
ORIGINAL PAPER
Introduction
Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs)
caused by human activities is a major environmental concern. The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) was
reported as 401.16 ppm in the month of November 2015 by
Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, USA [1]. The biological
route utilizing microalgae for CO2 mitigation and simultaneous value addition in the form of biofuels is identified
as one of the most viable options to tackle this problem [2].
However, the use of microalgae for CO2 sequestration is
limited due to various reasons: (1) unable to sustain at high
CO2 concentration, (2) lower oil productivity, (3) outdoor
cultivation, i.e., open pond system has lower CO2 fixation
efficiency, (4) high operating cost, (5) high nutrient
requirements, (6) availability of land to sequester CO2 at
large scale, and (7) difficulties in scale up of bioreactor
system [3, 4].
The limitations with respect to phototrophic CO2 utilization has motivated to look for more economic, efficient,
and effective biological alternative for CO2 mitigation and
utilization. The bacterial CO2 fixation got an immense
attention and advancements in the last decade. Bacterial
cells are smaller in size and may act as a prominent
replacement for algae by virtue of their fast growth rate and
ability to sustain high CO2 concentration [5]. Recent
studies have blurred the distinction between autotrophy and
heterotrophy, as heterotrophs are also capable of fixing
inorganic form of carbon via CO2 assimilation [6, 7]. One
study has shown that the microorganisms (heterotrophs)
such as Bacillus pumilus, Pseudomonas fragi, and
123
123
is defined as a fuel consisting of mono-alkyl esters of longchain fatty acids originating in fats, oils, or lipids.
Microbes are found to have a faster growth rate and are
capable to grow in large scales. This may be due to their
flexibility in metabolism, which gives them an advantage
over phototrophs for CO2 fixation and also the value
addition in terms of biofuel [5, 16].
The presence of complex enzyme fatty acid synthase
(FAS) in bacteria makes them capable of producing fatty
acids or fatty acids derivatives [17]. The fatty acids or fatty
acid derivatives are converted into nonmethane hydrocarbons by different pathways in bacterial cells [16, 18].
Experimental evidence suggested the accumulation of
lipids in bacterial cell ranging from 4 to 78.3 % of the total
cell dry weight [19]. Also, the microbial production of
long-chain hydrocarbons is having another possibility to be
used as a modern energy resource as they are the major
constituents of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel [7].
The previous studies are mainly focused on the utilization of NaHCO3 as a source of CO2, and there are few
studies which have reported the energy assessment of CO2
fixation via chemolithotrophs. Hence, there is a scope of
study for the utilization of CO2 by bacterial species as a
carbon source and to have better understanding for energy
assessment of CO2 fixation.
In the present study, bacterial species are isolated from the
naturally selected mixed culture obtained from sewage treatment plant (BITS Pilani, Rajasthan, India). Biomitigation of
CO2 using isolated species by conducting the batch experiments is carried out. The study also focused on the thermodynamic assessment for CO2 utilization by isolated specie.
The feasibility of reductive cellular CO2 assimilation utilizing
Fe[II] as an electron source is estimated by calculating the
values of overall DGreaction of possible redox reaction at 25 C
and 1 bar [9]. The work is emphasized on the overall metabolic reactions rather than the stepwise reactions which constitute assimilatory processes including CO2 assimilation. The
work shows the oxidation of Fe[II] and the reduction of CO2
and is coupled with the assimilation of CO2 into biomass as
hexadecanoic acid. The obtained biomass and the leachate
were further analyzed for the identification of cellular products using FTIR and GCMS. Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME)
analysis of fatty acid products was also carried out to estimate
the yield of biodiesel formed.
123
Xt Xo
tx to
123
MCO2
MC
WFAME
100
WBiomass
123
25
Control
0 ppm Fe[II] ion concnetration (*)
50 ppm Fe[II] ion concnetration
100 ppm Fe[II] ion concnetration
200 ppm Fe[II] ion concnetration
20
15
10
0
1
Time (Days)
123
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Time (Days)
Fig. 4 Dry weight on per-day basis at different Fe[II] ion concentration. The data represent the mean SD. Statistically significant
differences among duplicate groups, analyzed using t-test, are
represented as p \ 0.05 denoted by (*) and at the 0.05 level
population variation are not significantly different
123
1410.65, 1241.92, 1014.05, 752.49, and 666.98 cm-1 represented the peaks obtained from supernatant extract. The
obtained spectrum band can be classified into two ranges
from 3600 to 2500 cm-1 and from 1700 to 1000 cm-1. The
presence of carboxylic acid group was indicated by
somewhat messy absorption pattern in the region of
33002500 cm-1 with the broad OH band superimposed
on the sharp CH stretching bands (2946.40, 2834.37, 2900
and 2800 cm-1) (Figs. 5, 6). The stretch 1654.38 and
1645.34 cm-1 indicated the presence of compounds having
C=O bonds (Figs. 5, 6). The exact position of this broad
band depends on whether the carboxylic acid is saturated or
unsaturated, dimerized, or has an internal hydrogen bonding [34]. The presence of peak at 1449.25 cm-1 in cell
lysate extract and supernatant indicated the presence of C
H bend of alkanes (Figs. 5, 6). The stretch at 1412.45 cm-1
for cell lysate extract (Fig. 5) and stretch at 1410.65 cm-1
for supernatant extract (Fig. 6) specified the presence of C
C stretch in rings, i.e., indicated the presence of aromatic
compounds. The peaks obtained at 1114.42 and
1017.76 cm-1 for cell lysate extract (Fig. 5) and
1014.05 cm-1 for supernatant extract (Fig. 6) have shown
the presence of compound having CO bond. The peak at
595.04 cm-1 for cell extract and 752.49 cm-1 and
666.98 cm-1 for supernatant extract indicated the CH
rock of long-chain alkanes [34]. Thus, FTIR spectrum of
both the cell lysate and supernatant extract indicated the
presence of compounds having C=O, CH, CO, OH
bonds. The analysis further indicated the presence of
compounds having aromatic ring and long-chain alkanes.
However, one has to take in consideration that presented
results can differ slightly when procedures of sample
preparation and especially cell growth conditions are
changed. The structural composition obtained from FTIR
results were further strengthened by carrying out Gas
90
2 8 3 4 .37
2946.4 0
60
1 65 4.3 8
1 44 9 .25 ,
1 41 2 .45
1 1 1 4 .42
3304.5 5
595.0 4
4 00 0
3 50 0
3 000
2 500
2 000
W aven u m b er (cm
15 00
-1
10 00
5 00
123
2800
80
2900
1645.34
1410.65
1241.92
60
3271.27
1014.05
752.49
40
1017.7 6
30
Transmittance (% T)
Transmittance (% T)
100
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
666.98
1000
500
-1
Wavenumber (cm )
Fig. 6 FTIR spectrum of extracellular liquid phase of Bacillus cereus
SM1 in chloroform solvent
Run time
Formulae
Compound
% Area
Relative molecular
mass
Match
quality (%)
14.6
C11H14O3
Benzoic acid
0.76
194
89
19.017
C17H34O2
Hexadecanoic acid
0.29
270
89
20.717
C19H36O2
0.97
296
86
20.9
C18H36O2
Heptadecanoic acid
0.22
284
86
12.979
C15H32
Pentadecane
1.76
212
95
14.2
C17H36
Heptadecande
0.66
240
92
15.4
C11H24
Nonane
0.13
156
87
123
Run time
Formula
Compound
% Area
Relative molecular
mass
Match
quality (%)
4.429
C5H10O2
Butanoic acid
4.03
102
95
14.698
C11H14O3
Benzoic acid
5.53
194
94
17.303
C14H28O2
Tetradecanoic acid
3.45
228
94
19.015
C18H36O2
Hexadecanoic acid
2.00
284
90
27.2
C21H42O2
Eicosanoic acid
0.41
326
73
27.483
C21H30O2
Dehydroabietic acid
0.35
314
67
7
8
7.359
7.942
C10H22
C22H46
Decane
Docosane
0.31
0.35
142
310
86
89
12.982
C14H30
Tetradecane
4.24
198
94
10
14.259
C15H32
Pentadecane
1.62
212
92
11
15.467
C11H24
Nonane
0.26
156
88
oleic methyl ester were plotted, and their respective coefficient of correlation (R2) was obtained. The relationships
for calibration plot are shown in Eqs. (5)(8).
123
Overall reaction of reduction of CO2 into cellular biomass as hexadecanoic acid is given by Rxn (3).
16 CO2 Fe2 90 e 91 H
! C16 H30 OOH Fe3 30 H2 O
Raw material
Unit
Cost (Rs)
CO2 cost
Rs/kg
Water cost
Rs/kg
Nutrient cost
Rs/g
4.790
Production days
1g
396.4
4.790
22.0786
10
Aldrich. Therefore, according to Eq. (11), the EP was calculated as Rs 22.0786. Thus, the positive value obtained for
Ep shows that the process is very much feasible and can be
scaled up as the economic and effective solution for CO2
biomitigation.
Conclusions
The present work demonstrates the efficacy of mitigation
of CO2 using B. cereus SM1 in a batch mode. The
maximum removal efficiency was obtained as 84. 6
(5.76) % in the gaseous phase for 13 1 % (% v/v)
inlet CO2 concentration at 100 ppm of Fe[II]. This study
concluded that the optimum amount of energy source
(100 ppm of Fe[II]) plays a major role in CO2 fixation
using B. cereus SM1. The presence of value-added
products such as fatty acids and hydrocarbons is confirmed in the extracts obtained from cell lysate and
supernatant. The total FAME was obtained as 86.5 mg
from 100 mg of biomass showing the product yield of
86.5 (0.048) %. The FAME analysis supported that the
isolated strain B. cereus SM1 falls into the category of
oleaginous microbes. The production of biodiesel through
transesterification reaction has shown the importance of
B. cereus SM1 for the industrial purpose. The utilization
of gaseous phase CO2 by B. cereus SM1 is proven by the
approximate material balance and energy balance for the
present CO2 fixation system. The material balance and
energetic assessment shown for the present work could
enable to facilitate the implementation of such studies
under real-time scenarios.
Acknowledgments Authors are thankful to Council of scientific and
industrial research (CSIR) for providing the scholarship to the PhD
student (09/719 (0061)/2013 EMR-I), Department of Science and
Technology (DST), New Delhi and University Grants Commission
(UGC), New Delhi, India, for providing facilities to carry out the
research work.
123
References
1. CO2 Now. Earths CO2 home page. http://co2now.org/currentco2/co2-now/. Accessed 19th November 2015
2. Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotech Advan
25:294306
3. Chen C, Yeh K, Aisyah R, Lee D, Chang J (2011) Cultivation,
photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel
production: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 102(1):7181
4. Xu L, Weathers PJ, Xiong XR, Liu CZ (2009) Microalgal
bioreactors: challenges and opportunities. Eng Life Sci
9:178189
5. Saini R, Kapoor R, Kumar R, Siddiqi OT, Kumar A (2011) CO2
utilizing microbes-A comprehensive review. Biotech Advan
29:949960
6. Prabhu C, Wanjari S, Puri A, Bhattacharya A, Pujari R, Yadav R,
Das S, Labhsetwar N, Sharma A, Satyanarayanan T, Rayalu S
(2011) Region-specific bacterial carbonic anhydrase for biomimetic sequestration of carbon dioxide. Eng Fuel 25:13271332
7. Bharti KR, Srivastava S, Thakur SI (2014) Production and
characterization of biodiesel from carbon dioxide concentrating
chemolithotrophic bacteria, Serratia sp. ISTD04. Bioresour
Technol 153:189197
8. Sundaram S, Thakur SI (2015) Biosurfactant production by a CO2
sequestering Bacillus sp. strain ISTS2. Bioresour Technol
188:247250
9. Amend PJ, Mccollom TM (2005) A thermodynamic assessment
of energy requirements for biomass synthesis by chemolithoautotrophic micro-organisms in oxic and anoxic environments.
Geobiology 3:135144
10. Hedrich S, Schlomann M, Johnson BD (2011) The iron-oxidizing
proteobacteria. Microbiol 157:15511564
11. Mignone CF, Donati ER (2004) ATP requirements for growth
and maintenance of iron-oxidizing bacteria. Biochem Eng J
18:211216
12. Neilands JB (1995) Siderophores: structure and function of
microbial iron transport compounds. J Biol Chem
270(45):2672326726
13. Miethke M, Monteferrante GC, Marahiel AM, Dijl VMJ (2013)
The Bacillus subtilis EfeUOB transporter is essential for high
affinity acquisition of ferrous and ferric iron. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1833:22672278
14. Rodolfi L, Zittelli CG, Bassi N, Padovani G, Biondi N, Biondi G
(2009) Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid
synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(1):100112
15. Kaiwan-arporn P, Hai D, Nguyen T, Annachhatre P (2012)
Cultivation of cyanobacteria for extraction of lipids. Biomass
Bioenerg 44:142149
16. Ladygina N, Dedyukhina EG, Vainshtein MB (2006) A review on
microbial synthesis of hydrocarbons. Process Biochem
41:10011014
17. Campbell WJ, Cronan JE (2001) Bacterial fatty acid biosynthesis:
targets for antibacterial drug discovery. Annu Rev Microbiol
55:305332
18. Wang W, Lu X (2013) Microbial synthesis of alka(e)nes. Front
Bioeng Biotech 1:15
19. Kosa M, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Lipids from heterotrophic
microbes: advances in metabolism research. Tr Biotech
29(2):5361
123