P.O. Box 2224 W. St.

Kilda 3182

Ray Johnson
397 Nepean Hwy,
CHELSEA 3196
Privileged and confidential
Dear Ray,
K.J. Power vs you.
Anyone can make a mistake, but dont act for yourself.
Do you think Ken Marks and David Grace can help you, because they
investigated Powers department after people complained about things, and
gosh the Legal Ombudsman discovered Kev forget to audit himself for 6 years,
one case almost adding Kev as a defendant in the big Tietyens mortgage
collapse for acting without lawful authority (B an G v RPA, December 2002).
Kevn disagreed with everyone, including Hulls investigators and the Court of
Appeal. Anyone can make a mistake.
In Solicitors B and G v RPA, even Full Tribunal made a boo boo which the
Court of Appeal and Hulls uncovered. The Tribunal decided, whoops, Power
had lawful authority (he didnt) and they legally heard cases (but it didnt, said
3 Judges). See too the Legal Practice Bills Explanatory Memorandum, and
think about briefing Ian Dunns man who worked with Hulls, Andrew
Hamblyn Harris. (Oh, Hulls decided on a Legal Services Commissioner to
replace Powers depot, and Kev thinks the Commissioner will sub-contract
work to him. What does your MP think?
Did you know the Legal Ombudsman said in the papers Kevin forgot to audit
himself? Another boo boo? Cain says theres no need for an Auditor General
audit, but if you told Cain that hed disbelieve you. Royall at the Herald Sun
was the reporter, and the Aud Gen, Wayne Cameron, wants to peek at the
books. Whod be nervous bout re-opening the conspiracy theory case that
nearly added Kevin as defendant in 1999. Ask MacPherson and Kellys RMBL
investments, Rennick and Gaynors Mr. Barry Young, the Moses brothers, De
Jong, Gross, Tony Coleman at Coleman Lawyers and the Tax Offices Canberra
Solicitor. Cain has a spare $30,000,000 somewhere.
Did you know the Legal Practice (Validation) Act last year retrospectively cured
Institute mistakes from 1 January 1997? Who made lots of boo boos for years!
The Tribunal was without jurisdiction. No lawyers practicing certificates were
valid. Trust inspections and receiverships were illegal. Power was facing law
suits for millions. Theres pages and pages of boo boos, so youre not the first.

Look at the case dubbed KJ Power vs Himself trading as 21 Receiverships.

He sued himself using his own inhouse lawyer, briefed both sides, and
probably cross examined himself. Lots of ethical boo boos in that, eh, but even
the ethics gods make mistakes.
He also passed costs onto third parties who didnt know he was suing himself
in their names, and what was the Auditor General interested in?
I wonder why receiverships footed the bill because the question was whether
Kev himself was validly licensed or not. I mean, if I drive without a car licence
or lawyer licence, the question whether I had a licence, not whether I was
driving on errands in my capacity as a liquidator, receiver or whatever.
Imagine if accountants passed their speeding fines on to clients?
Dunns failure in 1997 to properly sign delegation of powers instruments
negatived everyones practising certificate (Legal Practice Validation Act 2003),
including Kevins. Why he sued himself as receiver is a mystery to me, though
it had the nice effect of effectively making third parties pay the Institutes and
Kevins costs. Phew.
Kevin even operated for 6 years without a practising certificate and without
public indemnity insurance. Being uninsured must make someone nervous.
His co-lecturer in ethics at Melbourne Uni, Justice Cummins, accepted that Kev
honestly made a boo boo, and the Legal Practice Board forgave him too.
The Board also tried, unlawfully said Cummins, to retrospectively validate his
practising certificate back to 1 Jan 1997. They made a boo boo too. Is your
boo boo that serious by comparison, or are you picked on because youre
small, ill and have a nice little practice Kevin can sell out from under you
without a tender?
Spend $30 on a Court search of Powers vs Himself and see when Kevin first
learned his licence was in doubt. According to the judgement, he learned this
around March 2003. But I think Dan Slattery raised it with Kevs litigators in
October 2002, and think Graeme Hubbard of Kew raised it with Kevin in 1999
or 2000. Peter Searle raised it with Kevin years and years ago as well. No one
suggests Kevin misled the Court, but when he cross examined himself, did he
tell the Court that his licence was in doubt from the day Hubbard in 1999
Hubbard told Kevin that Kevin stuffed up. Anyone can forget and make
mistakes.
Ask Power Tony Coleman at Coleman Lawyers and Linda Baxter. Power
withdrew his High Court appeal against the Court of Appeals discoveries in
Solicitors B and G v RPA, December 2002 because Hulls investigators of the

investigators discovered more that the Court did. (Did someone forget to tell
the Court of Appeal something?)
All these boo boos.
Someone, said the Court of Appal, acted without lawful authority, was caught
in a scandalous position, and used tactics and delays that must not be
repeated.
Who do you think that someone was? Hubbard and Barry Young at Rennick
and Gaynor (they acted in the Legal Ombudsman you know) surely didnt
delay the case they finally won. Ask Tony Coleman at Coleman lawyers about
delays, tactics and scandalous conflicts. Blimey, Kevin was also unlicensed
and ininsured and caught up in RMBL v Salus Quen where Moses in
Camberwell tried to add Kevin to a multi million dollar damages action because
(as the Legal Ombudsman discovered) Kevin forgot to audit his unlawful
receiverships too. No one thinks the uninsured Kevin feared losing his house.
Ask him if he knows who was in the scandalous conflict and used the tactics
and delays. Im certain he knows who it was.
How does your boo boo compare to all this, and does it put your case into
context?
Then look at the Explanatory Bill to the Legal Practice Validation Bill, where
the result of Kevs mistakes meant no lawyers had validating practicing
certificates, including Kevin, from 1997. When did Kev tell Cummins he first
learned his licence was in doubt? Of course no one suggests Kev deliberately
misled his co-lecturer friend on the bench. Boo boos happen.
Your boo boo should be forgiven too.
Have you thought about cross examining someone in an open hearing, and of
course be ready to roll in the rebuttal witnesses.
Would you like a reporter watching what questions are put to Kev in the box?
The Institute will issue a press release if they get you, but I think reportersd
luv to tell Hulls registered voters all about Kevins answers. Did you know
Powers Kevn Childs defamed jouno Jack Paccolli to put Herald Sun reporters
off the story, but years later the Courts, Hulls, Legal Ombudsman Auditor
General Jane Tong and others discovered things.
Lastly, is whatever Kevin tells his wife Michelle and accountants still
privileged?
Faithfully,