Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ISSN:2277-1581
01 Feb.2016
2. Materials
2.1 CEMENT :Ordinary Portland cement of 53 Grade
confirming to IS 12269-1987 was used. The properties of the
cement used were
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
38
2.2 AGGREGATES
The properties of coarse aggregates and fine aggregates are
given below
2.2.1 Coarse aggregate
10 mm maximum size broken granite metal of igneous origin
was used. Specific gravity was found to be 2.65.
2.2.2 Fine aggregates
Fine river sand was used. It was dried, sieved and stored. The
sand which was used falls under zone second of IS383. The
specific gravity was found to be 2.60.
2.2.3 WATER
Clean water, which was free from all impurities, was used for
the entire work of concrete preparation and curing
3. Mix Design Procedure
The proportioning of a concrete mixture is based on
determining the quantities of the ingredients which, when mixed
together and cured properly will produce reasonably workable
concrete that has a good finish and achieves the desired strength
when hardened. This involves different variables in terms of
water to cement ratio, the desired workability measured by
slump and cement content and aggregate proportions. The mix is
M30 Grade. Mix design is done according to Indian standard
recommended method of concrete mix design IS 10262-1982.
Stipulations for proportioning
a) Grade designation
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s2/202
: M 30
Page 116
ISSN:2277-1581
01 Feb.2016
: OPC 53 grade
Load
Cycle III
(Ton)
Loading
1.2
50.64
1.4
59.64
1.6
68.56
: nil
Mix ratio
Cement
Kg/m3
Fine
Aggregates
Kg/m3
Coarse
Aggregate
kg/m3
Water l/m3
450
502.2
1135.49
202.5
1.12
2.52
0.45
4.1.2
Load
Cycle III
(Ton)
Loading
0.2
35.25
0.4
56.35
0.6
72.35
cycle 1
0.8
82.5
Displacement in mm
90.25
1.2
107..65
1.4
113.64
1.6
135.15
0.2
12.64
0.4
19.54
0.6
26.35
0.8
32.65
41.21
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s2/202
Load in ton
-200
-100
-1 0
100
200
-2
Cycl2
From the experiment it has been found that the first crack was
formed at a load of 1.4 tonne. The ultimate load for hybrid
Page 117
ISSN:2277-1581
01 Feb.2016
(CR+HE) can carry was 2.4 tonne. The hysteretic Curves of the
specimen have been plotted in Fig.s 5.3 respectively.
4
2
Load in ton
3
2
Load in ton
-200
0
-100
-1 0
100
0
-200
Load in ton
2.5
Specimen1
(M1)
2
300
-2
-3
Cycle3
4
Displaccement in mm
cycle 1
4.3 DISCUSSIONS:
200
Cycle3
100
200
-100 -1 0
100
cycle 1
Cycl2
Displacement in mm
200
cycle 1 -3 2
Cycle3
Displacement in mm
-200
-2 0
-4
-2
-300
-100
Specimen 2
(M2)
1.5
1
Specimen 3
(M5)
0.5
0
0
100
200
Specimean
4( M8)
Fig 4.5 Comparison of Cyclic Load Deflection Curve for beam-column joint
5. Conclusions
The behavior of beam column joints were studied in the present
work and it has been concluded that
Based on the behavior of joints under the loads, it is concluded
that the use of hybrid steel fibers gives us optimum value for
exterior joints
The interaction between ultimate loads and degree of
confinement are not linear. This has to be further investigated.
The Hybrid Steel fibers can be efficiently used for seismic
reinforced beam column joint.
The deficiency in cumulative energy dissipation in the case of
non ductile reinforced beam column joint can be made good by
Hybrid Steel fibers strengthening.
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s2/202
Page 118
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s2/202
ISSN:2277-1581
01 Feb.2016
Page 119