Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2010
Cu2O(s)
(1)
Oxide films formed between 1040oC and 1050oC consist entirely of Cu2O and show p-type
semiconductivity while those grown between 200oC and 970oC consist of a mixture of cupric
oxide (CuO) and Cu2O. Since both oxides are semiconductors, the qualitative results and
conclusions of the present experiment are not affected by the presence or absence of CuO.
Page 18 of 84
2010
Cu2O(s)
(2)
Cu(OH)2-(aq) + 2H+(aq) + e-
(3)
2Cu(OH)2-(aq)
(4)
Laboratory
Materials Needed
The following procedures use pre-1982 US one-cent coins (i.e., copper pennies). Note that
pennies produced after this year are mainly composed of Zn, covered with Cu. Alternatively,
other coins (e.g., 2 Eurocents and 50 Mexican cents) or copper strips also give measurable
results.
Electrode preparation
1. Use fine sand paper to smooth both sides of several pennies until they shine.
2. Place them in 3 M HNO3 for 1 minute. Caution: You may wish to carry out this
treatment for your students to avoid exposure to nitric acid or to the fumes generated
during nitric acid treatment. Use eye protection and rubber gloves. Carry out this
treatment in a fume hood, as the reaction of nitric acid with Cu metal produces the
toxic gases NO and NO2.
3. Rinse the pennies three times with deionized water, then follow the procedures below
to fabricate a (reddish) semiconducting layer on the Cu surface.
a) Thermal method
1. Grasp one of the clean pennies with tweezers and heat it for 30 seconds at the interface
between the cold (i.e., gas feed) and hot (i.e., combustion) zones in the flame of a
Bunsen burner. The penny should acquire a brown-reddish color, indicative of the
formation of the semiconductor Cu2O.
2. Set the hot penny (red side up) on a clean and dry surface and allow it to cool to room
temperature.
3. If black CuO is also formed, it can be carefully peeled off from the surface or else
removed by rinsing with dilute HCl (e.g., 0.01 M).
b) Chemical method
1. Place 5 mL of a 0.1 M CuSO4 solution in a 20 mL beaker.
2. Immerse a clean penny in the solution and heat at 45-50 C for 2 h.
Page 19 of 84
2010
3. Then, extract the penny with the aid of forceps, rinse it twice with deionized water and
allow it to dry in air. Note the color on the surface of the penny exposed to the
solution (it should be reddish). (The bottom surface of the penny, less exposed to the
solution, may or may not develop a red color. The photovoltaic cell works equally
well, regardless.)
c) Electrochemical method
1. Place a water bath on a heating plate.
2. Place 10 mL of a 0.1 M Na2SO4 solution in a small beaker and immerse it in the water
bath. (Note: a small amount of NaCl may be added to the electrolyte to speed up the
oxidation of Cu.)
3. Grasp one of the pennies with an alligator clip and connect it to the anode of a variable
DC power source. The counter electrode (cathode) can also be another penny or a
copper plate or foil (other materials may be tested as well, since the function of the
cathode is primarily to close the circuit).
4. Place both electrodes in the Na2SO4 solution (do not allow them to touch each other).
A fixed and steady separation of 0.5 mm is recommended. Heat the solution to 4550C with constant stirring. (The experiment can be speeded by heating to higher
temperatures, i.e., 85C.)
5. Turn the power source on and adjust the applied voltage to 1 V. Allow the experiment
to proceed for 1 h. (Some Cu metal deposition may be noted at the cathode, but this
obviously does not interfere with the experiment.)
6. Extract the anodic penny with the aid of forceps, rinse it with water and allow it to dry
in air. Note the color of its surface (it should be reddish due to formation of Cu2O
from the oxidation of metallic Cu). If black CuO is also formed at the anode it can be
carefully removed by rinsing with dilute HCl (e.g., 0.01 M).
Cell preparation
Since the reddish layer on each penny treated by the above procedures
contains a photoactive surface, we will need to convey the
photocharges generated upon exposure to light into an external circuit.
For this, we will form a sandwich with two copper strips (3 cm long,
1 cm wide) made from sanded copper foil or thin copper sheet. The
penny will be like the ham in the sandwich. See Figure 1.
Page 20 of 84
2010
the copper strips holding it, and a counter electrode to close the circuit for measurement (e.g.,
a clean penny or a small Cu plate). Do not allow the two electrodes to touch each other.
Photovoltage measurement
1. Connect both electrodes to a multimeter (set the scale to a maximum of 200 mV).
Record the initial measurement.
2. Place a 100 W incandescent light bulb about 10 cm from the electrochemical cell, in
front of the semiconducting layer. (If one desires to remove any infrared light before it
reaches the cell in order to prevent undesired heating effects, a 100 mL beaker full of
water can be placed between the light bulb and the cell).
3. The set up is now ready. Measure and monitor for a few minutes the baseline voltage
produced by the cell in the dark (or until it becomes more or less stable, varying less
than 1 mV per min), taking measurements every 30-60 s.
4. Then turn the light on and similarly monitor for another few minutes the photovoltage
produced.
5. Repeat this cycle several times until you reach a total of 30 min. If more consistent
results are desired, the entire set up can be enclosed inside a cardboard box during
measurements.
6. Plot your results.
Questions
1. Report the results of your study, as illustrated by your graph prepared above.
Research Questions
1. Discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of silicon-based and copper oxide
based solar cells.
2. Which type of solar cell seems more promising?
3. What are some other materials under exploration for solar energy capture?
4. Are there technologies for solar energy capture that do not require the use of toxic
metals? What are their prospects for future development?
Page 21 of 84
2010
(1)
In this way, N is the sacrificial metal, and M is the cemented metal (that is, the one to be
removed). Besides the spontaneous nature of the process, other advantages include its relative
simplicity, ease of control, and the possible recovery of valuable metals. Challenges to this
process involve the presence of chelating agents, mass transfer limitations, and the
introduction of new species into the medium. Some examples of applications of cementation
processes include:
removal of polluting metal ions from aqueous effluents
purification steps in metallurgical operations
recovery of spent metals from different chemical operations
The present experiment is an example of this last application. It comprises the cementation of
Cu2+ (E0Cu2+/Cu = 0.34 V) by Zn (E0Zn2+/Zn = -0.76 V) in a small-volume spectrophotometer
cuvette. The concentration of Cu2+ may be easily monitored using a simple
spectrophotometer, but in the absence of such an instrument, the concentration may be
estimated and monitored in situ by comparing it visually to that of pre-prepared solutions of
known concentrations. The resulting concentration versus time data points are plotted and a
first rate plot of removal kinetic data can be analyzed.
While waste treatment does not represent a primary principle of green chemistry, it represents
a necessary topic for study for the foreseeable future, as we continue to deal with the
environmental aftermath of centuries of mining and other activities that have brought us into
Page 22 of 84
2010
contact with heavy metals. In addition, a firm grasp on the many key chemical concepts
presented in this experiment will provide students with the intellectual tools needed to address
the green principles more directly as they continue their studies.
Laboratory
Materials needed
0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09 and 0.1 M CuSO4
1 Zn pellet
Eleven 3-mL spectrophotometer cuvettes (path length = 1 cm)
1. Fill each of ten of the cuvettes with the ten different concentrations of CuSO4 solution.
These will serve as standards, allowing visual comparison of the test solution and
estimation of its approximate concentration.
2. Using forceps, find a Zn pellet of appropriate dimensions such that it cannot fall to the
bottom of the spectrophotometer cuvette (see Figure).
3. Rinse the pellet with acetone or ethanol to remove any grease or other foreign
substances from its surface, allow it to dry, and place it in the final cuvette as shown in
the Figure.
4. Next, with a Pasteur or a Beral pipet, fill the cuvette with 0.1 M CuSO4 solution as to
completely cover the Zn pellet.
5. Compare the concentration of Cu2+ inside the test cell every 5 minutes to that of the 10
pre-prepared solutions of known concentrations. Select the concentration that best
resembles that in the test cell. Record the time and the estimated concentration.
6. Continue making observations until the concentration of Cu2+ has decreased by at least
50% from the original concentration.
7. Plot the results on a concentration vs. time curve.
8. Literature reports typically show first order kinetics for the removal of ions by
cementation. If desired, test for this hypothesis as applied to your system by
calculating the corresponding first rate equation.
Page 23 of 84
2010
At the end of the experiment separate the Cu-covered Zn pellet, observe its color and place it
in a labeled container. The instructor may choose to recycle it for future experiments. Collect
all the solutions containing Cu(II). The instructor may choose to recover the Cu from these
solutions by electrolysis or other means.
Questions
1. Predict whether the following reactions are spontaneous or not, assuming T = 25oC
and that all concentrations are 1 M. Find the necessary data in any table of standard
potentials.
a) 2Ag(s) + Ni2+(aq) 2Ag+(aq) + Ni(s)
b) Ca(s) + Cd2+(aq) Ca2+(aq) + Cd(s)
c) 2Br- + Sn2+(aq) Br2(l) + Sn(s)
2. Write a general equation for the removal of a metal ion, Mx+(aq) from an aqueous
solution by cementation on a solid metal, N0(s) that becomes Ny+(aq).
3. During the removal of Cu2+ ions by cementation on elemental Fe, the following
reactions occur:
Cu2+(aq) + 2e- = Cu(s)
(1)
(2)
Page 24 of 84
2010
Page 25 of 84
2010
1 mL syringe
(for titration)
Page 26 of 84
2010
Table 1. Data Sheet with Actual Experimental Data and Results (using aliquots of 1 mL)
DETERMINATION OF ASA IN COMMERCIAL ASPIRIN
Aspirin tablet
mass
Analyzed mass
g
g
.1
180 g mol
NaOH concentration
mol L
mL
mL
3
average volume
used
mL
mL
.1
(in moles
and grams)
g
%
%
Table 2. Data Sheet with Typical Experimental Data and Results (using aliquots of 20 mL)
DETERMINATION OF ASA IN COMMERCIAL ASPIRIN
Aspirin tablet
mass
Analyzed mass
0.5819 g
0.5716 g
11.20 mL
11.15 mL
3
average volume
used
11.25 mL
11.20 mL
.1
180 g mol
NaOH concentration
0.0462 mol L
.1
Results
-4
5.17 10 mol
or 0.0931 g
0.466 g
81.5 %
4.4 %
Page 27 of 84
2010
Since the US official standard regulates that each tablet must contain 500 50 mg ASA, we
will assume the ASA content to be 0.5000 g. Then, knowing that only 0.5716 g out of 0.5819
g was transferred, the total ASA dissolved is:
(0.5716 g /0.5819 g) x 0.5000 g = 0.9823 x 0.5000 g = 0.4911 g
The titration gave 0.466 g of ASA, which then gives an error of:
(0.4911 g - 0.466 g) / (0.4911 g) x 100 = 5.1% error
Since the ASA purity is not 100% but 99.3% (see below), the average error decreases to:
{[(0.4911 g x 0.993) - 0.466 g] / (0.4911 g x 0.993)} x 100 = 4.4% error
Results obtained by students (using aliquots of 20 mL) are typically 5% lower than the mean
value calculated from the manufacturers data. Tests with pure acetylsalicylic acid, performed
by a technician using the same method, showed an average value of 98.5% for the pure acid
after 24 repetitions. This result validates the method because in this particular case, the purity
of the acetylsalicylic acid employed was tested to be 99.3%. Lower ASA percentage values
determined by the students are probably due to losses arising from poor quantitative transfer
to the volumetric flask. (Typical aspirin tablets contain 75% to 90% ASA by weight.) There is
also the possibility that the ASA content in aspirin tablets is lower than 500 mg, as has been
reported in the literature.
Questions
1. Provide the data requested in Table 1.
2. How do your results compare with the sample data provided in Table 2?
3. If your results differ, is the difference significant? If so, discuss possible reasons for
the difference.
Research Questions
1. Drug tablets usually contain many things in addition to the active drug compound.
What is an excipient? What is a filler? What is a binding agent?
2. What other types of materials are used in preparing drug tablets? Why are they added?
3. Compare drug administration in tablet form vs. injected drugs. What are the
advantages of tablet dosage? What are some of the difficulties that must be overcome
in order to administer a drug as a tablet?
References
This procedure was adapted by Jorge Ibaez (Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico) from the
original paper, Katia B. Gusmo, Emilse M. A. Martini, and Suzana T. Amaral.
Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) in Aspirin: A General Chemistry Experiment.
Chem. Educator 2005, 10, 444-446.
Page 28 of 84