Você está na página 1de 59

Filed 13 May 6 P1:10

Chris Daniel - District Clerk


10/2/2012
Harris County
ED101J017469188
1
By: Wanda Chambers

MARIE MCDONNELL

CAUSE NO. 2011-36476

VS.

WELLS FARGO BANK,


N.A., as Trustee for
Carrington Mortgage
Loan Trust, Series
2006-NC3 Asset Backed
Pass-Through
Certificates, et al

6
7
8

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

is

******************************************************
ORAL DEPOSITION OF
MARIE MCDONNELL

C

hr

12

OCTOBER 2, 2012

of

13

******************************************************

e

14

20
21

O

op
y

C

ial

19

fic

18

ORAL DEPOSITION of MARIE MCDONNELL, produced as


a witness at the instance of the Defendants, and duly
sworn, was taken in the above-styled and numbered
cause on OCTOBER 2, 2012, from 9:10 a.m. to
10:28 p.m., before Mendy A. Schneider, CSR, RPR, in
and for the State of Texas, recorded by machine
shorthand, at the offices of HUGHES ELLZEY, LLP,
2700 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1120, Houston, Texas,
pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the
provisions stated on the record or attached hereto;
that the deposition shall be read and signed.

Un
of

17

ffic

15
16

151ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Da

10
11

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

nie

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MARY ELLEN WOLF and


DAVID WOLF

lD

22
23
24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

2
1

A P P E A R A N C E S

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS:


3

5
6

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MR. W. CRAFT HUGHES


HUGHES ELLZEY, LLP
2700 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1120
Houston, Texas 77056
(888) 350-3931
Craft@CraftHughesLaw.com

lD

nie

FOR THE DEFENDANTS:

is

hr

C

of

11

e

10

MR. PETER C. SMART


CRAIN, CATON & JAMES, P.C.
1401 McKinney, Suite 1700
Houston, Texas 77010
(713) 658-2323
psmart@craincaton.com

ffic

Da

12

O

13

op
y

14

C

15

19
20

fic

18

Un
of

17

ial

16

21
22
23
24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

3
EXAMINATION INDEX

1
WITNESS:

MARIE MCDONNELL

EXAMINATION
BY MR. SMART
BY MR. HUGHES

SIGNATURE REQUESTED

REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION

PAGE
4
37

EXHIBIT INDEX

7
8

MCDONNELL EXHIBIT NO. 2


Report

Da

11

is

12

hr

13

of

C

14

e

15

ffic

16

O

17

op
y

18

C

19

23

fic
Un
of

22

ial

20
21

lD

10

nie

MCDONNELL EXHIBIT NO. 1


Affidavit

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

46
47

PAGE
4
4

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

4
1

having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:

(Marked McDonnell Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.)

4
5

E X A M I N A T I O N

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MARIE MCDONNELL,

BY MR. SMART:

Q.

What is your name, please?

A.

My name is Marie McDonnell, spelled

M-C-D-O-N-N-E-L-L.

lD

Q.

Ms. McDonnell, what do you do for a living?

10

A.

I am a mortgage fraud and forensic analyst

Da

and a certified fraud examiner.

is

11

nie

Q.

And do you have a college degree?

13

A.

I do.

14

Q.

And when did you get that college degree?

15

A.

1970.

16

Q.

And where did you get it?

17

A.

Merrimac College.

18

Q.

And where is Merrimac?

19

A.

20

Q.

23

C
of

e
ffic

O

op
y

C
ial

fic

22

North Andover, Massachusetts.


And what was -- was it a bachelor's degree?

A.

Yes.

Q.

And what was the major or what was the

Un
of

21

hr

12

bachelor in?

In what?

24

A.

Political science.

25

Q.

Did you have a minor?

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

5
1

A.

I -- I did, yes; which, actually, I started

out as a biology major; so, I -- I actually have more

science and math and biology courses than political

science, but that's the degree.

Q.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

So, you have a -- you have a major and a

degree in political science, and you have a minor in

biology?
A.

Yes.

Q.

And do you have any postgraduate degrees?

10

A.

No.

11

Q.

And do you have any certificates or licenses

nie
Da

is

hr

A.

Yes.

I have a real estate broker's license

C

13

of a professional nature?

of

12

lD

in Massachusetts, and I've achieved several

15

designations; most recently, from the Association of

16

Certified Fraud Examiners, the designation of

17

certified fraud examiner.

op
y

O

ffic

e

14

I am also a certified real estate

ial

C

18

exchange consultant, and I've achieved the graduate

20

realtor institute designation from the National

21

Association of Realtors.

23
24
25

Un
of

22

fic

19

Q.

Is that a sampling or is that -- is that the

entirety?
A.

That's what I recall at the moment in terms

of designations from other trade associations.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

6
1

Q.

When did you get your broker's license?

A.

I believe that was January of 1988.

Q.

Did you work in real estate from the time you

graduated in '70 until '88, or did you do other

things?

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

A.

No, I did other things.

Q.

What -- what -- what -- professionally, what

did you do between the time you graduated and the time

you started working in a -- in a real estate-related

11

A.

Uh-huh.

Da

field?

Well, in 1970, I married, had three

is

10

nie

lD

children.

So, I was a stay-at-home home for about

13

seven years.

14

cottage industry business which was a handcraft

15

manufacturing of my own design work.

hr

12

ffic

e

of

C

After that, I started my own home-based

That actually gave me a lot of business

op
y

O

16
experience.

18

cities in the United States where I had manufacturers'

19

representatives representing my product.

20

to the Philippines for about five weeks in 1981, where

21

I worked with a manufacturer there and licensed my

22

designs.

23

business.

24
25

It required that I travel to various

It took me

Un
of

fic

ial

C

17

Q.

So, it -- it gave me a basic background in

And when did you start working in the real

estate field?

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

7
1

A.

I obtained my real estate salesperson's

license in late 1986 and apprenticed for a year under

a real estate broker and investor who was also a real

estate developer.

then, formed my own consulting practice as Marie

McDonnell, Real Estate Counselor and conducted that

from about 1988 through 1991, when I changed my d/b/a

to The Mortgage Counselor.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

lD

Q.

I'm going to show you what's marked as

nie

After the year's apprenticeship, I,

Exhibit 1, which is an affidavit that I think you

11

signed.

12

that you signed.

Da

10

hr

is

If you'll confirm that that's your affidavit

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

Looking at -- we're going to go over this a

e

of

C

13

little bit, and I'll ask some questions about some of

16

the things that -- that you've said in this affidavit.

op
y

O

ffic

15

Looking at Item 2 on the first page, you

say in this affidavit that you are a -- a

19

credentialed, certified fraud examiner.

20

that?

21
22

Do you see

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

17

A.

I do.

Q.

And who -- who gives that -- that -- when you

23

say "credentialed," does that -- that means you -- you

24

have a certificate?

25

A.

Yes, I do.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

8
1

Q.

Okay.

And who -- who is -- what the body?

Can you talk a little bit about the body that gives

this certificate?
A.

The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners,

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5

which I believe is headquartered right here in Texas;

Austin, I believe.

association that provides very specialized training,

education, educational materials to individuals who

are involved in some capacity in investigations, fraud

nie

lD

And this is a -- an international

examination.

Its members consist of attorneys,

11

accountants, fraud examiners for insurance companies,

12

various departments of state and federal government;

13

quite a varied body of professionals.

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

Q.

It's not only people who work in real estate?

15

A.

No, not at all.

16

Q.

What does one have to do to receive the

op
y

O

ffic

e

14

certificate that you received, which is, I think, a

18

certified fraud examiner?

ial

A.

Yes.

They require a certain educational

fic

19

C

17

background -- I believe, at least five years of field

21

experience working under a more experienced

22

professional -- three letters of recommendation from

23

existing members of the Association of Certified Fraud

24

Examiners or otherwise, I believe; and I had to take

25

an examination that required that I have a basic

Un
of

20

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

9
1

knowledge and comprehension of various aspects of

fraud examination and interview techniques and various

other things.
Q.

In that same sentence in Item 2, you -- where

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5

you say, "I'm a mortgage fraud and forensic

analysis" -- "analyst" -A.

Analyst, uh-huh.

Q.

-- are those -- is that -- are those two

nie

10

categories or one category, mortgage fraud and


forensic analyst?

Da

lD

Is that two different things or -- or

is

11
one thing?

13

A.

It's -- I would say both.

14

Q.

So, it -- it could be two things?

15

A.

Yes.

16

Q.

All right.

C

of

e
ffic

O

Well, what -- let's talk about a

op
y

17

hr

12

forensic analyst.
When you say you're a forensic analyst,

what -- what does that mean?

20

you do as a forensic analyst?

21

What does a -- what do

fic

19

Un
of

ial

C

18

A.

I have dedicated my practice to essentially

22

understanding real estate and real estate financing

23

transactions; so, essentially, although I do have the

24

capability of looking at other types of documents or

25

information and to -- to be able to understand that

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

10
1

information to fill in missing gaps and so forth,

essentially, my practice is focused in the area of

real estate and real estate finance.


In terms of answering your question

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5

about what is a forensic analyst, by that, I mean it

would be a body of existing information or data or

contracts, and there will be a -- often a body of

information concerning a certain transaction.

able to look at all of that information and determine

nie

lD

I am

other information that might be missing or where those

11

particular documents or information fits in on a time

12

line and often reconstruct missing data that helps me

13

and others to -- to understand the transaction.

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

So, it's -- it's an exercise and an

e

14

ability to understand not only what is there but what

16

isn't there.

O

op
y

Q.

So, you -- I don't want to put words in your

mouth, but it sounds like you analyze real estate

19

transactions.

20

part.

21

And that's not -- that's the analyst

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

17

ffic

15

What is forensic?

What does -- in your

22

own words, what is -- how does "forensic" come into

23

play, as an analyst, in what you do?

24
25

A.

Well, forensic science is -- can be applied

to many different fields, of course, both on the

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

11
criminal, civil side; but what "forensic" actually

is -- means is looking back historically at some event

that happened -- or in my case, it could be looking at

a particular document, such as a mortgage note -- and

looking at other evidence that relates to that note or

the servicing of that note and putting all of those

pieces together, including, as I say, missing pieces

that I can reconstruct through my understanding and

forensic analysis.

lD
nie

And how long have you been doing the forensic

Da

11

Q.

analyzing of real estate transactions?


A.

For 25 years.

13

Q.

Okay.

hr

12

is

10

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

of

C

And what percentage of your -- of your

professional practice is -- do you consider your --

15

you're doing forensic -- working as an forensic

16

analyst?

19

ffic

O
op
y

Actually, at this point, I would say, a

C

hundred percent of the time, that's what I'm doing.


Q.

ial

18

A.

And what -- do you have any education in

fic

17

e

14

forensic -- being a forensic analyst, or is it just

21

on-the-job training?

22

Un
of

20

A.

Well, there -- there is no doubt that my 25

23

years of experience in the field is the primary

24

qualifier for the work that I do and for my level of

25

achievement.

That is an -- it constitutes an

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

12
1

irreplaceable body of knowledge and firsthand

experience.

But, to your answer your question, yes,


I have taken specific training from the Association of

Certified Fraud Examiners, from various bar

associations, from banking compliance concerns.

belong as well to a Listserv of attorneys who practice

in this area and in bankruptcy.

lD

So, there is a -- an ongoing self-study

Da

process, as well as more formalized training.


Q.

What -- can you talk a little bit about the

is

11

nie

9
10

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

formalized training you've had in this -- in this

13

field?

14

A.

Yes.

15

Q.

Are you looking at your CV?

16

A.

I am.

17

Q.

Is that part of your report?

18

A.

I -- I did not include it in the report; but

I did bring a file with me that we can print, or we

20

can make copies of this.

21
22

fic

19

Un
of

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

12

MR. HUGHES:

Well, we've -- we've

produced your --

23

THE WITNESS:

24

MR. HUGHES:

25

THE WITNESS:

Okay.
-- CV in -Okay.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

13
1

MR. HUGHES:

THE WITNESS:

MR. HUGHES:

(BY MR. SMART)

question.

Would you repeat the question, please?


MR. SMART:

Can you read -- can you read

Da

the question back, please.

(The requested portion was read.)

11
12

lD

A.

9
10

Well, then, answer the

nie

Q.

Okay.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MR. SMART:

A.

All right.

is

Our first disclosure

response.

5
6

Right.

From the Association of Certified

hr

-- our disclosure response.

Fraud Examiners, I've taken a course in ethical issues

14

for fraud examiners.

15

exam review course, which is very comprehensive.

16

taken a course in various areas of the practice of

17

fraud examination from the association.

20
21

of

I've

op
y

O

ffic

e

The certified fraud examiner

I have --

Were those courses real estate

ial

C

(BY MR. SMART)

related?

fic

19

Q.

A.

Un
of

18

C

13

No, not specifically real estate related.


Real estate-related courses I've taken

22

from the American Real Estate Academy.

Basic

23

qualifying courses.

24

continuing education requirement to maintain my -- my

25

license.

I have a continuing legal -- or

I've taken a number of courses from the

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

14
1

Massachusetts Association of Realtors in order to

achieve that designation of graduate realtor

institute.
From the National Association of

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5

Realtors, I've taken several commercial investment

real estate courses.

From the National Council of Exchangers,


a number of courses on the mechanics of real estate

exchanging.

nie

lD

I've taken a number of courses on real

11

estate finance, understanding the buying and selling

12

of private mortgages at a discount, I've taken courses

13

in real estate options.

16

A.

e

taken?

ffic

15

Who's offering these courses that you've

These -- these are various masters in their

O

Q.

op
y

14

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

fields, except for, of course, the courses that I've

18

taken from the various realtor institutions at the

19

national and state level.

ial

fic

I've taken a number of courses in

Un
of

20

C

17

21

foreclosure defense from the Massachusetts Bar

22

Association and the Boston Bar Association, and I've

23

recently presented in several of those courses, as

24

well as a speaker.

25

Q.

I have taken --

Would you call those ones offered by the Bar,

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

15
1

the Massachusetts Bar or the Boston Bar -- are those

seminars?

seminars?
A.

Yes.

Most recently -- and I'm not -- not

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Is that what those are, one- or two-day

sure that I'm seeing it on here; I -- I'd have to add

it -- I -- I cochaired a two-hour session for the

Massachusetts Bar Association that covered the -- the

settlement between the national banks and the 49 state

attorneys general.

nie

lD

I've taken intensive courses from O. Max

Da

10

Gardner, III, who is a nationally renowned bankruptcy

12

attorney, a highly regarded expert in his field who

13

has been conducting bankruptcy boot camps since about

14

2006.

15

four-day training sessions that go for about 12 hours

16

per day.

17

speak at and co-instruct at a number of others.

of

C

hr

is

11

ffic

e

I've taken two of -- these are intensive

op
y

O

I've taken two of them, and he's asked me to

I've taken various courses in regulation

ial

C

18

and compliance from the Massachusetts Bankers

20

Association, the CUNA Mutual Group, BankersOnline

21

and....

23

Un
of

22

fic

19

Q.

Okay.

Do you consider yourself an expert in

any area of the law?

24

MR. HUGHES:

Objection; form.

25

You can answer.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

16
1

A.

I am not an expert in law.

Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

Do you consider yourself an --

an expert in -- in anything to do with handwriting,

like a signature, whether or not the -- whether it's a

forged signature or not?

A.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

I am not an expert, although I'm very

familiar with signatures on real estate-related

documents and I do have an ability to spot what I

believe might be --

nie

lD

MR. HUGHES:

11

THE WITNESS:

12

MR. HUGHES:

is

e
ffic

okay?

THE WITNESS:

O

But I -- I -- I have, in the past, accurately

Q.

ial

C

identified forged signatures on documents.


(BY MR. SMART)

20

And maybe I answered....

21
22
23
24
25

Okay.

op
y

A.

Un
of

19

Keep going,

Let me ask it another way.

fic

18

hr

But you keep answering.

16
17

I'm going to object to the

C

form of the question.

14
15

Okay.

of

13

Hold on just a minute.

Da

10

Do you have any training in -- in

detecting forged signatures?


A.

No formal training in detecting forged

signatures, no.
Q.

And do you hold yourself out as an expert --

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

17

as a handwriting expert?
A.

I do not.

3
4

MR. HUGHES:
Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

Objection; form.
Looking at Item 5 in your

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

affidavit which is Exhibit 1, I see the word there,

"foreclosure forensics."

lD

forensics"?
A.

By that, I mean reviewing foreclosure-related

nie

What do you mean by "foreclosure

documents that, of course, relate back to a real

11

estate financing transaction.

is

Da

10

And I conduct research using various

hr

12

mortgage-backed securities databases that I subscribe

14

to to check the accuracy of some of these

15

foreclosure-related documents and essentially analyze

16

whether the documents I'm examining are accurate,

17

truthful, or whether there are conflicts between those

18

documents and research that I've conducted using

19

various other tools and databases at my disposal.

21
22

of

e

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

fic
Un
of

20

C

13

Essentially, I describe that process in

my expert report in this case.


Q.

Looking at Item 7, Page 2 of your affidavit,

23

I see the word "robo-signing," which is a word I've --

24

I've heard a lot.

25

Can you tell me what you mean when you

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

18
say "robo-signing"?

2
3

A.

And for a moment, I'm just going to

refer to my report, if I may.

4
5

Yes.

Q.

Does your report give a definition of

"robo-signing"?

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

A.

It does on Page 24.

Q.

Let's look at -- here's Exhibit 2 to your

deposition, which I think is the report you're looking

at.

nie

lD

Page 24?

is

11

Just so the record's clear, we're on

Da

10

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

Of Exhibit 2.

14

A.

Yes, that's right.

15

Q.

Where "robo-signing" is defined as the

And I'm looking at Item 42?

ffic

e

of

C

hr

12

practice of an employee or agent of the servicer

17

signing documents automatically, without a due

18

diligence review or verification of facts.

op
y

C

ial

A.

Yes.

And that's a definition that was

fic

19

O

16

devised by the Office of the Inspector General for the

21

United States Department of Housing and Urban

22

Development, and it's about as good a general

23

definition of "robo-signing" as I've seen.

24
25

Un
of

20

I actually go further than this, though,


in terms of my own definition of what constitutes a

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

19

2
3
4

robo-signer.
Q.

All right.

Why don't you tell me how you go

further.
A.

Sure.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

I actually -- before I would ever


identify a signing officer -- that is, an individual

who executes a mortgage-related document; for example,

an assignment of the mortgage or discharge of the

mortgage or an affidavit, anything along those

nie

lD

lines -- I first analyze the document itself to

11

determine whether or not that document is truthful and

12

accurate based upon my ability to go in and research

13

the transaction.

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

Where I find that the document contains

e

14

misrepresentations, false statements, omissions of

16

material fact, and where I find that happens

17

repeatedly, then, I will identify that individual as a

18

robo-signer.

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

15

So, in my definition, it's not just that

fic

19

they're signing a lot of documents; they're signing

21

documents that they know or should know contain

22

inaccuracies or misrepresentations.

23

Un
of

20

Q.

Is it possible that under your definition of

24

a robo-signer, someone could have performed a due

25

diligence review?

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

20
1

A.

Yes, it is, to some extent.

Q.

Does your report list what you've reviewed

for this case for your opinions in this case?


A.

It does, yes.

Q.

All right.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Let's -- let's go to Page 4 of

your affidavit, where I think you've listed seven

opinions or conclusions that you've reached, and it

looks like those may be the same opinion that you put

in your report.

lD

nie

I think those are the same.

A.

Yes.

11

Q.

Those are the -- those are -- those are your

is

hr

A.

Yes.

I removed the reference to defendant

C

13

opinions in your report also, I think.

of

12

Da

10

and plaintiff in the report because, essentially, I'm

15

just identifying the entities here.

ffic

All right.

O

Q.

So, let's -- let's look at this.

op
y

16

e

14

The first one, the first opinion in

the -- on Page 4 of your affidavit, reads, "Defendant

19

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is not the current owner and

20

holder of Plaintiffs' Note and Deed of Trust."

21

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

17

Okay.

Who is -- who do you -- do you

22

have an opinion as to who is the current owner and

23

holder of the plaintiffs' note?

24

MR. HUGHES:

Objection; form.

25

You can answer.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

21
1

A.

I don't know.

And I think that is the

subject of the litigation that a court will ultimately

decide.
(BY MR. SMART)

Do you have an....

Let me ask this:

as to who is the current holder of Plaintiffs' note?


A.

I know who should be physically holding the

note, yes.

10

Q.

nie

But do you have an expert opinion as to who

Da

11

Do you have an opinion

lD

I guess what I'm asking is:

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Q.

is physically holding the note?

is

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

And what is that opinion?

14

A.

That would be Deutsche Bank National Trust

C

of

Yes.

19

Q.

20

Un
of

ial

C

A.

22

e

current holder of the original note?

18

21

ffic

It's your opinion that Deutsche Bank is the

fic

17

Q.

O

16

Company.

op
y

15

hr

12

A.

And what do you base that on?


MR. HUGHES:

Objection; form.

You can answer.


I base that on the requirements of the

23

pooling and servicing agreement that governs this

24

particular securitization.

25

Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

Have you seen a -- a copy of

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

22
1

the note in this case that has an endorsement?

A.

I have seen a copy of the note, yes.

Q.

All right.

A.

blank.

Q.

The copy that I reviewed is endorsed in

All right.

Do you know what the effect of an

endorsement in blank means?


MR. HUGHES:

Objection; form.

nie

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

or was it endorsed in blank?

10

You can answer.

Da

And was it endorsed specifically

A.

Yes, I do.

12

Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

13

A.

An endorsement of a negotiable instrument in

is

11

of

C

hr

What does it mean?

blank without naming a payee would convert that

15

instrument to bearer paper, meaning that whoever is

16

actually physically holding that note, under Article 3

17

of the Uniform Commercial Code, has the ability to

18

negotiate it.

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

Q.

And do you know who is holding the original

fic

19

e

14

note, physical -- physically holding the original

21

note?

22

Un
of

20

A.

I can't --

23

MR. HUGHES:

24

Go ahead.

25

A.

Objection; form.

I can't say that I do at this moment; but up

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

23
1

until -- if it was taken out of the custody and

control from Deutsche Bank National Trust Company for

purposes of this legislation, that's one thing.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

But the original would be held in a

4
5

vault maintained by the document custodian, Deutsche

Bank.

Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

And I apologize if I asked

this:

opinion that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is not

nie

A.

Da

11

the current holder of Plaintiffs' note?


Okay.

is

10

Can you just summarize the basis for your

lD

Well, in this case Wells Fargo


Bank, N.A. is serving as a trustee of the Carrington

14

Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-NC3; and as trustee,

15

it is responsible for the assets that are allegedly

16

held in that trust fund.

17

O

ffic

e

of

C

13

op
y

hr

12

The problem is that my analysis shows

that there is no evidence in the record that I have

19

reviewed that the Wolfs' note and their security

20

instrument were properly negotiated, delivered,

21

transferred to all of the necessary parties in the

22

securitization chain that would be required under a

23

mortgage loan purchase agreement and a pooling and

24

servicing agreement in order to convey those

25

instruments into the trust fund.

Un
of

fic

ial

C

18

There are fatal

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

24
1

breaks in the chain of title which indicate that those

instruments never made it into the trust fund.

Therefore, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank is


not the current owner and holder of the plaintiffs'

note and deed of trust.

Q.

Okay.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

So, sounds like you're not saying that

Wells Fargo Bank doesn't currently physically have

possession of the original note.

opinion, is it?

nie

lD

That's not your

I mean, that's within the realm of

Da

10

possibility, isn't it, that -- that Wells Fargo

12

Bank, N.A. physically possesses the original note?

hr

C

They may at -- at this moment, yes.

of

14

A.
That's --

e

13

is

11

Q.

And they may --

16

A.

-- a possibility.

17

Q.

And they may possess -- I mean, you're not

saying they don't?

19

physically possess it, are you?

20

your opinion?

21

You're not saying they don't


Is that -- or is that

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

op
y

O

ffic

15

A.

Like I say, at this moment in time, I do not

22

have any personal knowledge of where the physical note

23

actually is.

24

order to securitize the instruments, and I know what

25

the pooling and servicing agreement require in terms

I know what -- where it had to be in

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

25
of maintaining that -- the negotiable instrument and

the security instrument and the other mortgage-related

documents in the master file; but I do suspect that

due to the litigation, there may have been a request

for the release of those documents.

therefore, at the moment, I don't actually know who is

physically holding the original note.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

physically holding the note who may have the right to

nie

However, regardless of who is actually

lD

And, so,

negotiate it, that does not mean they have the right

11

to enforce -- to collect on the note or to enforce the

12

security instrument.

hr

is

Da

10

Q.

And why is that?

14

A.

Well, under the provisions of the Texas home

equity fixed/adjustable rate note that the Wolfs

16

signed, in Paragraph 1, where they make their promise

17

to pay for having received a loan of $400,000, it

18

says, "Lender, or anyone who takes this Note by

19

transfer and who is entitled to receive payments under

20

the Note, is called 'Noteholder.'"

21

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

15

Un
of

e

of

C

13

And if you read the -- the note and the

22

security instrument together, it is the noteholder who

23

would have the enforcement rights.

24
25

So, if Wells Fargo is in physical


possession of the note, it may have the right to

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

26
negotiate that note -- that is, sell it to someone

else -- but it doesn't mean that they have the right

to enforce the -- the instrument because they would

have to prove that they have the right to receive the

payments, which means that they paid consideration for

it and that it was legally and properly transferred

into the trust.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Q.

And is that your expert opinion?

A.

That is my opinion, yes.

10

Q.

It's one of your opinions?

11

A.

Yes.

12

Q.

All right.

nie

Da
is

hr

And you base that on your

C

interpretation of the language that you just read?

of

13

lD

MR. HUGHES:

15

You can answer.

ffic

In combination with my research, specialized

O

A.

op
y

16

Objection; form.

e

14

knowledge, training, and the documents that have been

18

presented for my review.

ial

Q.

(BY MR. SMART)

Let's look at your third

fic

19

C

17

opinion in order here on the affidavit, Page 4, which

21

is under C; and it reads, "Plaintiffs' mortgage loan

22

was never transferred into the 2006-NC3 trust for

23

which Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is trustee in

24

strict compliance with the Pooling and Servicing

25

Agreement executed on August 1, 2006 between the

Un
of

20

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

27
1

parties, which was governed by the laws of the State

of New York."

Do you see that?


A.

I do.

Q.

What did you mean by the word "parties" in

11
12
13

lD

Do you know if the Wolfs were a party to the

nie

Q.

pooling and servicing agreement?

Da

10

servicing agreement.

A.

They were not a party to the pooling and

servicing agreement.
Q.

is

Well, the parties to the pooling and

hr

A.

Who were the parties, if you know, to the

C

that -- in that opinion?

of

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

pooling and servicing agreement?

15

your report?

ffic

Actually, I don't have a copy of the pooling

O

A.

op
y

16

Do you have that in

e

14

and servicing agreement as a part of the report; I

18

have links to the site.

ial

But that would be -- the pooling and

fic

19

C

17

servicing agreement would be -- and I'd have to double

21

check in this case; but it would be between the

22

depositor, who, in this case, was Stanwich Asset

23

Acceptance Company LLC and the trustee Wells Fargo

24

Bank, N.A. and the master servicer, who, at the time,

25

was New Century Mortgage Corporation.

Un
of

20

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

28
1

Q.

So, we've got a servicer, we've got a

depositor and we've got -- a servicer, a depositor,

and who -- who --

A.

The trustee.

Q.

The trustee.

A.

Yes.

Q.

Okay.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Of the trust?

What is the role of the depositor in a

pooling and servicing agreement or in -- in any of the

securitization process?

nie

A.

The depositor is a special-purpose entity

Da

10

lD

that essentially serves as a pass-through entity whose

12

job it is to purchase the mortgage loans from the

13

sellers' sponsor in what is defined as a true sale.

14

It organizes -- that is, the depositor, then,

15

organizes the -- a qualified special-purpose entity

16

known as issuing entity -- which, in this case, was

17

named Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust Series

18

2006-NC3 -- and draws up certificates and -- on behalf

19

of the -- the issuing entity.

hr

C

of

e

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

fic

It, then, deposits the mortgage loans

Un
of

20

is

11

21

and all of the rights to other contracts and to

22

payments and receivables, as well as the mortgage

23

loans -- it deposits all of the corpus of the trust

24

fund into the issuing entity in exchange for those

25

certificates, which are, then, sold to investors.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

29
1

Q.

Okay.

So -- well, you -- so, in this case,

we had a -- a loan that was -- the lender was New

Century Mortgage, correct?


A.

Yes, that's right.

Q.

And so, would New Century Mortgage --

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

they're -- you refer to them as the originator,

correct?

11

lD

They were the lender and, for purposes

of the securitization, they were also deemed to be the

nie

10

Yes.

originator.

Da

A.

Q.

And so, the way -- let's talk about this

is

particular trust and this particular pooling and

13

servicing agreement.

of

C

hr

12

Can you tell me how the transfer of the

e

14

note was to occur to the ultimate -- where it was

16

ultimately supposed to end up?

O

op
y

17

ffic

15

A.

Yes.

New Century Mortgage Corporation, in

ial

C

18

order to have the Wolf mortgage loan -- and by

20

"mortgage loan," that's a defined term in my report

21

which essentially refers to their note and security

22

agreement -- in order for that to be securitized, New

23

Century Mortgage Corporation would have had to sell

24

the mortgage loan to an affiliate by the name of

25

NC Capital Corporation who, for purposes of the

Un
of

fic

19

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

30
1

securitization, is identified as the responsible

party.

NC Capital Corporation entered into a


mortgage loan purchase agreement with Carrington

Securities LP and Stanwich Asset Acceptance

Company LLC, and that mortgage loan purchase agreement

states that the responsible party would sell the

mortgage loans to Carrington Securities LP, who, for

purposes of the mortgage loan purchase agreement, was

lD

nie

the seller's sponsor.

Da

10

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Carrington Securities LP, as the

is

11

seller's sponsor, then, sold the mortgage loan to --

13

would have to sell the mortgage loan to Stanwich Asset

14

Acceptance Company LLC, who is the purchaser under the

15

mortgage loan purchase agreement and the depositor

16

under the pooling and servicing agreement.

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

12

So, it would be Stanwich Asset

Acceptance Company LLC who would, then, deposit the

19

mortgage loan into the trust fund over which Wells

20

Fargo served as trustee.

21

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

17

Also, the actual physical documents were

22

to be transferred to the trustee Wells Fargo Bank,

23

who, under the pooling and servicing agreement, was

24

required to deliver those to custodian Deutsche Bank

25

National Trust Company.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

31
1

Q.

So, you've talked about a mortgage loan

purchase agreement and a pooling and servicing

agreement.

guide the securitization process or are there others

also?

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Are those the two primary documents that

A.

Well, the pooling and servicing agreement

governs this particular securitization.

other deal documents that were created in conjunction

with the securitization, but that is the governing

nie

document.

Da

10

There are

lD

Q.

The pooling and servicing agreement?

12

A.

Yes.

13

Q.

And you know that from -- how do you know

hr

C

of
e

A.

I know that from, first of all, reading the

pooling and servicing agreement; from years of

17

studying the subject; from reading various court

18

decisions; speaking to hundreds of attorneys about

19

these subjects; taking specialized training, as well

20

on securitization.

21

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

16

Un
of

15

that?

ffic

14

is

11

Q.

Briefly, do you have a definition of "pooling

22

and servicing agreement" in your report?

23

not, can you give me in -- in your own words sort of a

24

layman's interpretation of what a pooling and

25

servicing agreement is, generally speaking?

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

If -- if

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

32
1

A.

I -- I do discuss the pooling and servicing

agreement in the analysis section of my report; but

generally speaking, the pooling and servicing

agreement is the agreement that actually creates

the -- the trust, the entity, and governs the trust.

It has to be created under a certain document, and

that is the pooling and servicing agreement.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

actually, the roles of each entities -- each of the

nie

And it describes very precisely,

lD

entities involved in the securitization.

11

quite a long list of definitions of terms.

12

organized into certain sections that cover the various

13

aspects of how this entity is to function and what the

14

rules of the various parties are who will see the

15

securitization through to its completion.

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

It's

Can you sort of give me the same description

O

Q.

op
y

16

It also has

Da

10

or can you also describe for me, generally speaking,

18

what a mortgage loan purchase agreement is?


A.

20

Sure.
The -- the mortgage loan purchase

Un
of

19

fic

ial

C

17

21

agreement is essentially a purchase and sale agreement

22

between, in this case, NC Capital Corporation as the

23

responsible party, Carrington Securities LP as the

24

seller's sponsor and Stanwich Asset Acceptance

25

Company LLC as the purchaser under the mortgage loan

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

33
1

purchase agreement.
I actually have an excerpt from the

mortgage loan purchase agreement in my report, on

Page 17; and essentially, the mortgage loan purchase

agreement is an agreement between these parties to buy

and sell particular mortgage loans that have been

identified on a mortgage loan schedule that have been

slated for securitization into this particular deal.

And this buy-sell transaction creates another, quote,

10

"true sale" that is important to the whole structured

11

finance deal and to qualifying the transaction and the

12

issuing entity for favored tax status under the

13

Internal Revenue Code.

lD

nie

Da

is

hr

C

of

Q.

All right.

Let's look still at your

e

14

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

affidavit, Exhibit -- I mean, Page 4.

16

the opinion that's under G.

Let's look at

op
y

O

ffic

15

A.

Okay.

18

Q.

Do you see that?

Where I think you say the

ial

C

17

plaintiffs' mortgage loan was never physically

20

transferred from Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as

21

trustee of the 2006-NC3 trust to the document

22

custodian Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

23

Un
of

fic

19

By the "mortgage loan," looking at your

24

definition up above, you're talking about the note and

25

the deed of the trust, right?

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

34
1

A.

Yes.

Q.

Now, how -- what is the basis for your

opinion that the -- if I'm reading this correctly,

you're saying the note, the physical note, was

never -- the custodian never -- never touched it,

never had possession of it?

saying?

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Is that what you're

A.

No.

Q.

What do you mean by "physically transferred"?

10

A.

I mean that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. did not

Da

nie

lD

physically transfer those documents to the document

12

custodian.

13

Q.

hr

is

11

of

C

I mean, like, I am holding a piece of paper;

and -- and if I give it to another person, is that

15

what you mean by "physically transfer" from -- when

16

you give this opinion?

op
y

O

ffic

e

14

17

MR. HUGHES:

A.

20

Q.

That's what I mean.


(BY MR. SMART)

So, it's your opinion that --

Un
of

fic

19

You can answer.

ial

C

18

Objection; form.

21

that Wells Fargo Bank never gave the original note to

22

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company?

23
24
25

A.

Not at the -- not at the time the mortgage

loan was allegedly securitized.


Q.

That's correct.

And what do you base -- what -- what's the

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

35
1

basis for that opinion?

A.

Here's where my specialized knowledge comes

into play.
I have heard trial testimony and read

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

many court cases and have discussed this process among

my peers; have also spoken to correspondent lenders

who originated these type of transactions and whose

job it was to actually physically deliver those files,

the original mortgage loan documents.

And to a high

nie

lD

degree of probability, I make this statement that the

11

trustee Wells Fargo Bank did not physically deliver

12

these instruments to Deutsche Bank National Trust

13

Company.

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

That's not to say Deutsche Bank National

e

14

Trust Company didn't receive them; it's just that the

16

trustee was not the one to ever have physical

17

possession of them nor transfer them to Deutsche Bank.

O

op
y

And correct me if I'm wrong:

C

Q.

It sounds like

ial

18

ffic

15

you're basing that on, that's what -- that's what

20

happens a lot of the time.

21

probably happened this time, too?

Un
of

22

fic

19

23
24
25

MR. HUGHES:

So, your opinion is, it

Objection; form.

You can answer.


A.

Yes, I think that's fair to say.


(Mr. Hughes exited the room.)

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

36
MR. SMART:

1
2

Let's go off the record

while he's out of the room.


(Break from 10:09 a.m. to 10:16 a.m.)

(Mr Hughes entered the room.)

5
6

Q.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

(BY MR. SMART)

Ms. McDonnell, have you -- are

you being paid for your services in this case?


A.

Yes.

Q.

And who is it who retained you?

A.

Craft Hughes retained me.

10

Q.

Okay.

11

A.

His firm retained me.

12

Q.

And are you being paid by the hour?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

And is your hourly rate the same or does

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

it -- is it different depending on whether you're in a

16

deposition or reviewing documents?

op
y

O

ffic

15

A.

It's the same.

18

Q.

And what is your hourly rate?

19

A.

20

Q.

22
23
24

ial

fic

$395 an hour.
All right.

Un
of

21

C

17

That's all the questions I have.


MR. HUGHES:

I have just a few

questions.
THE WITNESS:

Sure.

25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

37
1
2

E X A M I N A T I O N
BY MR. HUGHES:

Q.

Have you been involved in any other lawsuits

or litigation or cases relating to wrongful

foreclosure?

A.

Yes.

Q.

Okay.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

And can you please explain for the

jury what those cases are and what your involvement

was.

nie

lD

A.

Yes.

That would be a long list.

11

Q.

Well, let's start with Eaton.

12

A.

Yes.

hr

There is an important case that was

of

C

13

Okay.

is

Da

10

brought in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at

15

first, brought in a superior court on the state level,

16

styled, Henrietta Eaton versus Federal National

17

Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae as it's commonly

18

referred to.

19

amicus brief, a friend-of-the-court brief, when that

20

case was appealed up to our Massachusetts Supreme

21

Judicial Court.

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

My role in that case was to file an

fic

Un
of

22

e

14

It involved a case where Henrietta Eaton

23

had been foreclosed upon by a mortgage servicing

24

company, and, at the eviction stage, she challenged

25

whether or not that foreclosure was brought properly.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

38
1

The state court judge ruled that it was


not a proper foreclosure because there was a

separation between the note and the mortgage, and the

party who brought the foreclosure may have owned the

mortgage but was not the owner and the holder of the

note.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Q.

And did you file an amicus brief in

that case?

A.

I did.

10

Q.

Okay.

11

A.

In the -- the -- what's referred to commonly

nie

Okay.

lD

is

Da

And what about Ibanez?

as the Ibanez case in the Massachusetts, I played a

13

role at the trial court level there.

14

this case, I was allowed to intervene as a friend of

15

the court.

16

Q.

Okay.

17

A.

And that case involved -- actually, it

Again, I -- in

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

12

started out three loans that had been securitized; all

19

had been foreclosed upon by the trustees of the

20

securitization trust.

21

those cases, the trial court judge overturned those

22

foreclosures as wrongful.

23
24
25

And in two out of three of

Un
of

fic

ial

C

18

Q.

Okay.

And as you know in this case, we're

dealing with a securitization trust?


A.

Yes.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

39
1

Q.

And in -- in the Ibanez or "ih-ban-yez"

(phonetic) case, they were also dealing with a

securitization trust?
A.

That's correct.

Q.

Okay.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Have you ever been offered a

consulting position with any type of governmental

entity to aid the government in assisting them with

wrongful foreclosure investigation?


Yes.

10

Q.

Okay.

how that happened.


A.

is

12

And please explain what that is and

Okay.

hr

11

nie

A.

Da

lD

Well, I -- I have consulted with

of

C

13

attorneys general in a number of states over the

15

years, but most recently I conducted a one-day

16

training for the staff of the New York State Attorney

17

General's office.

18

special agents and assistant attorney generals

19

handling civil matters, as well as criminal matters.

22
23

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

fic

21

And this involved training both

Okay.

A.

Uh-huh.

Q.

Did they come to you and ask you, or did you

Q.

Un
of

20

e

14

Let me stop you right there.

submit some type of application?

24

A.

They asked me.

25

Q.

Okay.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

40
1

A.

And recently, I was awarded a contract to

provide a -- a three-day training session to special

agents of a variety of federal entities.

the request of the Office of the Inspector General for

the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which actually

regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

This was at

And just yesterday, I was also contacted


by someone in the FHFA OIG's office to consult with

them on some mortgage servicing issues.

nie

lD

So, it is anticipated that I'll be doing

Da

10

a fair amount of training going forward for these

12

various special agents.

hr

Okay.

And are you aware that the Wolf case

C

Q.

of

13

is

11

at issue here is being filed as a proposed class

15

action?

ffic

e

14

A.

Yes, I am.

17

Q.

Okay.

Do you believe that the plaintiffs' --

when I say "the plaintiffs," I mean the Wolfs -- and

19

the class members' claims stem from a common course of

20

conduct by Wells Fargo?

21
22

fic

ial

C

18

Un
of

op
y

O

16

A.

Yes.

Q.

Okay.

And do you believe each member of the

23

proposed class has been damaged by Wells Fargo's

24

course of conduct and action?

25

A.

Yes.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

41

2
3
4

Q.

Do you recall how many mortgages and deeds of

trust have been transferred into this 2006-NC3 trust?


A.

Just a moment, please.

I think I did that

research.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Yes.

involved in this securitization.

Q.

Okay.

There were 7,548 mortgage loans

And is it true that approximately 571

of these mortgage loans relate to Texas residents and

Texas property?

nie

I can look that up.

I -- and I may have

Da

11

A.

before, so....

That sounds about right.

is

10

lD

Q.

Approximately?

13

A.

Yes.

14

Q.

And approximately 233 of these mortgage loans

hr

12

e

of

C

Uh-huh.

that have been allegedly transferred into this trust

16

involve real property located in Harris County, Texas?

O

op
y

17

ffic

15

A.

Yes.

I believe I -- I -- I looked at those

statistics, by which I can go in through using the

19

Bloomberg terminal and support all of this -- rather,

20

and analyze all of this data, sorting by ZIP code,

21

metropolitans statical area, state, and so forth.

23

ial

fic

Un
of

22

C

18

Q.

So, you're saying that you can verify these

numbers later?

24

A.

Yes.

25

Q.

Okay.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

42
1

A.

I -- I certainly can.

Q.

And you're aware that the plaintiffs in the

proposed class in this case are seeking to certify a

class comprised of all Texas residents whose mortgages

and deeds of trust have been allegedly transferred

into the 2006 trust?


A.

Yes.

Q.

All right.

13

nie

Da

Yes.

With respect to the securitization and

is

12

A.

actually the foreclosure process, yes, I do.


Q.

hr

11

both the plaintiffs and the proposed class?

Okay.

Is fair to say that the size of the

C

10

common questions of fact that would equally apply to

of

Do you believe there's numerous

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

proposed class in this case will number in the

15

hundreds or thousands?

ffic

e

14

A.

Yes.

17

Q.

Is there at least one material fact issue

op
y

O

16

shared by every proposed class member that's common

19

with the plaintiffs in this case?

22
23
24
25

ial

fic

21

Yes.

Q.

Do you -- can you explain or list at least

A.

Un
of

20

C

18

one or two of these common factual issues?


A.

Yes.
With respect to what was required to

securitize these loans, every single one of them would

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

43
1

have to follow the same deal flow that I've just

described here during the course of this deposition.

Q.

Would -- what about an allegation that

these -- that a fraudulent transfer of lien was filed

with the county clerk's office?

common factual issue shared by the proposed class and

the plaintiffs?

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

Would that be a

A.

Yes.

Q.

And when it -- when we allege -- or when the

nie

lD

plaintiffs allege a fraudulent transfer of lien, what

11

exactly -- what document is that referring to?

is

A.

For example, in the Wolfs' case, I have it

hr

12

Da

10

here attached to my report as Exhibit D.

14

"Transfer of lien."

It is called

e

of

C

13

And what this proposes to do is to -- to


assign the security instrument and the note from, in

17

this case, New Century Mortgage Corporation, directly

18

into -- or directly over to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as

19

trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust Series

20

2006-NC3 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates.

21

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

16

Un
of

ffic

15

So, it purports to assign and transfer

22

all of the rights contained in those instruments to

23

Wells Fargo Bank as trustee.

24
25

MR. HUGHES:

Okay.

I'll pass the

witness.

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

44
1

MR. SMART:

(Deposition concluded at 10:28 a.m.)

No more questions.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5
6
7

lD

nie

Da

10

is

11

hr

12

of

C

13

e

14

ffic

15

op
y

O

16
17

21
22

ial
fic

20

Un
of

19

C

18

23
24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

45
1

Please indicate changes on this sheet of paper,


giving the change, page number, line number and reason
for the change. Please sign each page of changes.

PAGE/LINE

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

10

______________________________________________________

11

______________________________________________________

12

______________________________________________________

13

______________________________________________________

14

______________________________________________________

15

______________________________________________________

16

______________________________________________________

17

______________________________________________________

18

______________________________________________________

19

______________________________________________________

20

______________________________________________________

21

______________________________________________________

22

______________________________________________________

23

______________________________________________________

REASON FOR CHANGE

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

CORRECTION

Un
of

WITNESS CORRECTIONS AND SIGNATURE

24
25

______________________________________
MARIE MCDONNELL

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

46
1
2
3

I, MARIE MCDONNELL, have read the foregoing


deposition and hereby affix my signature that same is
true and correct, except as noted on the previous
page(s), and that I am signing this before a Notary
Public.

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

4
5
6

______________________________________
MARIE MCDONNELL
STATE OF T E X A S

COUNTY OF ___________

nie

lD

10

15

Da

is

hr

C

of

14

e

13

ffic

12

Before me, ___________________________, on


this day personally appeared MARIE MCDONNELL, known to
me, or proved to me under oath or through
____________________ (description of identity card or
other document), to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office on
this, the _____ day of ________________, 2012.

O

11

op
y

16

C

17

21

fic

20

________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF TEXAS

My Commission Expires: _______________________

Un
of

19

ial

18

22
23
24
25

JOB NO. 1-133489

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

47
1
CAUSE NO. 2011-36476
2
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4
VS.
5
6
7
8

WELLS FARGO BANK,


N.A., as Trustee for
Carrington Mortgage
Loan Trust, Series
2006-NC3 Asset Backed
Pass-Through
Certificates, et al

151ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION
ORAL DEPOSITION OF MARIE MCDONNELL
OCTOBER 2, 2012

Da

10

hr

is

11

I, Mendy A. Schneider, a Certified Shorthand

C

12

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

nie

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MARY ELLEN WOLF and


DAVID WOLF

lD

Reporter in and for the State of Texas, hereby certify

14

to the following:

e

ffic

That the witness, MARIE MCDONNELL, was duly sworn

O

15

of

13

by the officer and that the transcript of the oral

17

deposition is a true record of the testimony given by

18

the witness;

C

ial

That the deposition transcript was submitted on

fic

19

op
y

16

_____________, 2012, to the witness, or to the

21

attorney for the witness, for examination, signature,

22

and return to U.S. Legal Support, Inc., by

23

_____________, 2012;

24
25

Un
of

20

That the amount of time used by each party at the


deposition is as follows:

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

48
1

MR. HUGHES - 00:11:25

MR. SMART - 01:00:49


That pursuant to information given to the

deposition officer at the time said testimony was

taken, the following includes counsel for all parties

of record:

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

MR. W. CRAFT HUGHES, Attorney for Plaintiffs.


MR. PETER C. SMART, Attorney for Defendants.
I further certify that I am neither counsel for,

nie

lD

related to, nor employed by any of the parties or

11

attorneys in the action in which this proceeding was

12

taken, and further that I am not financially or

13

otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.

14

Further certification requirements pursuant to

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

10

Rule 203 of TRCP will be certified to after they have

16

occurred.

Certified to by me this 9th of October, 2012.

21
22

ial
fic
Un
of

20

C

18
19

O
op
y

17

ffic

15

__________________________________
Mendy A. Schneider, CSR NO. 7761
Expiration Date: 12-31-12

23
24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012

49
1

3
4
5
6

The original deposition was _____ was not _____


returned to the deposition officer on _____________,
2012.
If returned, the attached Corrections and
Signature page contains any changes and the reasons
therefor;

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

FURTHER CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 203 TRCP

If returned, the original deposition was delivered


to MR. PETER C. SMART, Custodial Attorney;

11

lD

nie

10

That the deposition was delivered in accordance


with Rule 203.3, and that a copy of this certificate
was served on all parties shown herein and filed with
the Clerk.

Da

is

That $_______ is the deposition officer's charges


to the Attorney for Defendants, MR. PETER C. SMART,
TBA# 00784989, for preparing the original deposition
transcript and any copies of exhibits;

hr

12

C

Certified to by me this 9th of October, 2012.

of

13

ffic

e

14

op
y

16
17

20
21

C

ial

fic

19

U.S. Legal Support, Inc.


Firm Registration No. 122
363 North Sam Houston Pkwy East
Suite 900
Houston, TX 77060-4001
713/653-7100

Un
of

18

_________________________________
Mendy A. Schneider, CSR NO. 7761
Expiration Date: 12-31-12

O

15

22
JOB NO. 1-133489
23
24
25

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
1

C

ial

fic

Un
of

8:4,7,23 12:4 13:12


13:17 14:1,4,22,22
15:7,20 37:17
associations 5:25
12:6
attached 1:20 43:13
49:4
attorney 15:12 39:16
39:18 47:21 48:7,7
49:6,8
attorneys 8:10 12:7
15:9 31:18 39:14
48:11
August 26:25
Austin 8:6
automatically 18:17
awarded 40:1
aware 40:13 42:2
a.m 1:17 36:3,3 44:2

Da

nie

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

based 19:12
basic 6:22 8:25 13:22
basing 35:19
basis 23:8 34:2 35:1
bearer 22:15
behalf 28:18
believe 6:2 8:5,6,20
8:24 16:9 40:17,22
41:17 42:8
belong 12:7
biology 5:2,3,7
bit 7:15 8:2 12:11
blank 22:4,6,8,14
Bloomberg 41:19
body 8:1,2,13 10:6,7
12:1
boot 15:13
Boston 14:22 15:1
Boulevard 1:19 2:4
Break 36:3
B
breaks 24:1
bachelor 4:23
brief 37:19,19 38:7
bachelor's 4:20
Briefly 31:21
back 11:2 13:10
bring 12:19
17:10
broker 7:3
Backed 1:7 47:7
broker's 5:13 6:1
background 6:22
brought 37:14,15,25
8:20
38:4
Bank 1:5 20:19 21:14 business 6:14,16,23
21:16 23:2,6,9,13
buy 33:5
24:3,7,12 26:23
buying 14:11
27:24 30:22,24
buy-sell 33:9
33:20,22 34:10,21
C
34:22 35:11,12,14
35:17 43:18,23 47:5 C 2:1,8 26:21 48:7
Bankers 15:19
49:6,8
BankersOnline
call 14:25
15:20
called 25:20 43:13
banking 12:6
camps 15:13
bankruptcy 12:8
capability 9:24
15:11,13
capacity 8:9
banks 15:8
Capital 29:25 30:3
bar 12:5 14:21,22,25
32:22
15:1,1,7
card 46:12
base 21:19,22 26:12
Carrington 1:6 23:13
34:25
28:17 30:4,8,11

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

American 13:22
amicus 37:19 38:7
amount 40:11 47:24
analysis 9:6 11:9
23:17 32:2
analyst 4:10 9:6,7,10
9:17,18,20 10:5,19
10:23 11:16,20
analyze 10:18 17:15
19:10 41:20
analyzing 11:11
Andover 4:19
answer 12:3 13:6
15:25 20:25 21:21
22:10 26:15 34:18
35:23
answered 16:20
answering 10:4 16:14
anticipated 40:10
apologize 23:7
appealed 37:20
appeared 46:11
application 39:23
applied 10:24
apply 42:9
apprenticed 7:2
apprenticeship 7:4
approximately 41:7
41:12,14
area 10:2 12:8 15:23
41:21
areas 13:16
Article 22:16
asked 15:16 23:7
39:24
asking 21:4
aspects 9:1 32:13
Asset 1:7 27:22 30:5
30:13,17 32:24 47:7
assets 23:15
Asset-Backed 43:20
assign 43:16,21
assignment 19:8
assistant 39:18
assisting 39:7
association 5:15,21

op
y

A
ability 10:15 16:8
19:12 22:17
able 9:25 10:9
above-styled 1:16
Academy 13:22
Acceptance 27:23
30:5,14,18 32:24
accountants 8:11
accuracy 17:14
accurate 17:16 19:12
accurately 16:17
achieve 14:2
achieved 5:14,19
achievement 11:25
acknowledged 46:13
action 40:15,24 48:11
48:13
actual 30:21
add 15:5
affidavit 3:9 7:10,11
7:16,18 17:5,22
19:9 20:6,18 26:20
33:15
affiliate 29:24
affix 46:1
Agency 40:5
agent 18:16
agents 39:18 40:3,12
agreement 21:23
23:23,24 24:25
26:25 27:8,10,12,14
27:17,20 28:8 29:13
29:22 30:4,6,9,15
30:16,23 31:2,3,6
31:11,16,22,25 32:2
32:4,4,7,18,21,21
33:1,3,5,5
ahead 22:24
aid 39:7
al 1:8 47:8
allegation 43:3
allege 43:9,10
allegedly 23:15 34:24
41:15 42:5
allowed 38:14

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
2

C

ial

fic

Un
of

lD

nie

Da

hr

C

of

e

ffic

O

38:13,15,21 47:3
cover 32:12
covered 15:7
co-instruct 15:17
Craft 2:3 36:9 48:7
Craft@CraftHugh...
2:6
CRAIN 2:9
created 31:8 32:6
creates 32:4 33:9
credentialed 7:19,23
criminal 11:1 39:19
CSR 1:17 48:20
49:15
CUNA 15:20
current 20:19,22
21:7,17 23:10 24:4
currently 24:7
Custodial 49:6
custodian 23:5 30:24
33:22 34:5,12
custody 23:1
CV 12:15,24

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

consist 8:10
constitutes 11:25
18:25
consult 40:8
consultant 5:19
consulted 39:13
consulting 7:5 39:6
contacted 40:7
contain 19:21
contained 43:22
contains 19:14 49:4
continuing 13:23,24
contract 40:1
contracts 10:7 28:21
control 23:2
convert 22:14
convey 23:24
copies 12:20 49:9
copy 21:25 22:2,5
27:16 49:10
Corporation 27:25
29:18,23,25 30:3
32:22 43:17
corpus 28:23
correct 29:3,7 34:24
35:18 39:4 46:2
CORRECTION 45:4
Corrections 45:1
49:4
correctly 34:3
correspondent 35:6
cottage 6:14
Council 14:7
counsel 48:5,9
Counselor 7:6,8
county 1:4 41:16
43:5 46:9 47:4
course 10:25 13:13
13:15,16 14:17
17:10 40:19,24 43:2
courses 5:3 13:18,21
13:23,25 14:6,8,10
14:12,14,17,20,23
15:10,18
court 1:2 21:2 31:17
35:5 37:15,21 38:1

is

Clerk 49:11
clerk's 43:5
cochaired 15:6
code 22:17 33:13
41:20
collect 25:11
college 4:12,14,17
combination 26:16
come 10:22 39:22
comes 35:2
commercial 14:5
22:17
Commission 46:20
common 40:19 42:9
42:18,22 43:6
commonly 37:17
38:11
Commonwealth
37:14
companies 8:11
company 21:15 23:2
27:23 30:6,14,18,25
32:25 33:22 34:22
35:13,15 37:24
completion 32:15
compliance 12:6
15:19 26:24
comprehension 9:1
comprehensive 13:15
comprised 42:4
concerning 10:8
concerns 12:6
concluded 44:2
conclusions 20:7
conduct 17:12 40:20
40:24
conducted 7:6 17:18
39:15
conducting 15:13
confirm 7:11
conflicts 17:17
conjunction 31:8
consider 11:14 15:22
16:2
consideration 26:5
46:14

op
y

32:23 43:19 47:6


case 11:3 17:21 20:3
20:3 22:1 23:12
27:21,22 28:16 29:1
32:22 36:6 37:13,18
37:20,22 38:8,12,14
38:17,23 39:2 40:13
42:3,14,19 43:12,17
cases 35:5 37:4,8
38:21
categories 9:9
category 9:9
CATON 2:9
cause 1:1,17 47:1
Century 27:25 29:3,5
29:18,23 43:17
certain 8:19 10:8
32:6,12
certainly 42:1
certificate 7:24 8:3
8:17 49:10
certificates 1:8 5:11
28:18,25 43:20 47:8
certification 3:6
47:10 48:14 49:1
certified 4:11 5:16,17
5:18 7:19 8:4,18,23
12:5 13:12,14 47:12
48:15,17 49:12
certify 42:3 47:13
48:9
chain 23:22 24:1
challenged 37:24
change 45:2,3,4
changed 7:7
changes 45:2,3 49:4
charges 49:7
check 17:14 27:21
children 6:12
cities 6:18
civil 1:19 11:1 39:19
claims 40:19
class 40:14,19,23
42:3,4,10,14,18
43:6
clear 18:10

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

D
D 43:13
damaged 40:23
data 10:6,12 41:20
databases 17:13,19
Date 48:21 49:15
DAVID 1:3 47:3
day 15:16 46:11,15
deal 31:8 33:8,11
43:1
dealing 38:24 39:2
decide 21:3
decisions 31:18
dedicated 9:21
deed 20:20 24:5
33:25
deeds 41:1 42:5
deemed 29:9
defendant 20:13,18
23:9 24:3 26:23
33:20
Defendants 1:16 2:7

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
3
Exhibit 3:7,8,10 4:3
7:10 17:5 18:7,13
33:15 43:13
exhibits 49:9
existing 8:23 10:6
exited 35:25
experience 6:17 8:21
11:23 12:2
experienced 8:21
expert 15:12,22 16:1
16:3,6,25 17:1,21
21:10 26:8
Expiration 48:21
49:15
Expires 46:20
explain 37:7 39:10
42:21
expressed 46:14
extent 20:1

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

lD

nie

Da

hr

C

of

e

ffic

O

E
E 2:1,1 4:4 37:1 46:8
East 49:19
Eaton 37:11,16,22
education 8:8 11:19
13:24
educational 8:8,19
effect 22:7
ELLEN 1:2 47:3
ELLZEY 1:18 2:4
employed 48:10
employee 18:16
endorsed 22:3,4,5
endorsement 22:1,8
22:13
enforce 25:11,11
26:3

C

ial

fic

Un
of

enforcement 25:23
entered 30:3 36:4
entirety 5:23
entities 20:15 32:9,10
40:3
entitled 25:19
entity 28:10,11,15,16
28:19,24 32:5,13
33:12 39:7
equally 42:9
equity 25:15
essentially 9:21,23
10:2 17:15,20 20:14
28:11 29:21 32:21
33:4
estate 5:13,18 6:3,25
7:1,3,4,6 8:14 9:22
9:22 10:3,3,18
11:11 13:18,20,22
14:6,8,11,13 17:11
estate-related 6:9
13:21 16:7
et 1:8 47:8
ethical 13:13
event 11:2
eviction 37:24
evidence 11:5 23:18
exactly 43:11
exam 13:15
examination 3:1,3
8:10,25 9:2 13:17
47:21
examiner 4:11 5:17
7:19 8:18 13:14
examiners 5:16 8:4
8:11,24 12:5 13:13
13:14
examining 17:16
example 19:7 43:12
excerpt 33:2
exchange 5:19 28:24
Exchangers 14:7
exchanging 14:9
executed 26:25 46:13
executes 19:7
exercise 10:14

is

diligence 18:18 19:25


directly 43:17,18
discharge 19:8
disclosure 13:1,3
discount 14:12
discuss 32:1
discussed 35:5
disposal 17:19
DISTRICT 1:2,8
47:3,8
document 11:4 19:7
19:10,11,14 23:5
31:10 32:6 33:21
34:11 43:11 46:12
documents 9:24
10:11 16:8,18 17:10
17:15,16,18 18:17
19:20,21 25:3,5
26:17 30:21 31:3,8
34:11 35:9 36:16
doing 11:10,15,18
40:10
double 27:20
doubt 11:22
draws 28:18
due 18:17 19:24 25:4
duly 1:16 4:2 47:15
d/b/a 7:7

op
y

48:7 49:8
defense 14:21
defined 18:15 28:13
29:20
definition 18:4,19,23
18:25 19:19,23
31:21 33:24
definitions 32:11
degree 4:12,14,20 5:4
5:6 35:10
degrees 5:9
deliver 30:24 35:8,11
delivered 23:20 49:6
49:10
Department 18:21
departments 8:12
depending 36:15
deposit 30:18
deposition 1:11,15,20
18:8 36:16 43:2
44:2 46:1 47:10,17
47:19,25 48:4 49:2
49:2,6,7,8,10
depositor 27:22 28:2
28:2,7,10,14 30:15
deposits 28:20,23
describe 17:20 32:17
described 43:2
describes 32:8
description 32:16
46:12
design 6:15
designation 5:16,20
14:2
designations 5:15,25
designs 6:22
detecting 16:22,23
determine 10:9 19:11
Deutsche 21:14,16
23:2,5 30:24 33:22
34:22 35:12,14,17
developer 7:4
Development 18:22
devised 18:20
different 9:11 10:25
36:15

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

F
fact 19:16 42:9,17
facts 18:18
factual 42:22 43:6
fair 35:24 40:11
42:13
false 19:15
familiar 16:7
Fannie 37:17 40:6
Fargo 1:5 20:19 23:9
23:12 24:3,7,11
25:24 26:23 27:23
30:20,22 33:20
34:10,21 35:11
40:20 43:18,23 47:5
Fargo's 40:23
fatal 23:25
favored 33:12
federal 8:12 37:16
40:3,5
FHFA 40:8
field 6:10,25 8:20
11:23 12:13 15:12
fields 10:25 14:17
file 12:19 25:3 37:18
38:7

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
4
forward 40:11
four-day 15:15
fraud 4:10,11 5:16,17
7:19 8:4,9,11,18,23
9:2,5,9 12:5 13:13
13:14,14,17
fraudulent 43:4,10
Freddie 40:6
friend 38:14
friend-of-the-court
37:19
function 32:13
fund 23:16,25 24:2
28:24 30:19
further 18:24 19:3
48:9,12,14 49:1

graduate 5:19 14:2


graduated 6:4,8
Group 15:20
guess 21:4
guide 31:4

lD

nie

Da

is

hr

C

of

e

ffic

O

C

ial

fic

Un
of

37:2 43:24 48:1,7


hundred 11:18
hundreds 31:18
42:15
I
Ibanez 38:10,12 39:1
identified 16:18 30:1
33:7
identify 19:6,17
identifying 20:15
identity 46:12
ih-ban-yez 39:1
III 15:11
important 33:10
37:13
inaccuracies 19:22
include 12:18
includes 48:5
including 11:7
INDEX 3:1,7
indicate 24:1 45:2
individual 19:6,17
individuals 8:8
industry 6:14
information 9:25
10:1,6,8,9,10,11
48:3
Inspector 18:20 40:4
instance 1:16
institute 5:20 14:3
institutions 14:18
instrument 22:13,15
23:20 25:1,2,12,22
26:3 43:16 46:13
instruments 23:25
24:2,24 35:12 43:22
insurance 8:11
intensive 15:10,14
interested 48:13
Internal 33:13
international 8:6
interpretation 26:13
31:24
intervene 38:14
interview 9:2

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

H
hand 46:15
handcraft 6:14
handling 39:19
handwriting 16:3
17:1
happened 11:3 35:21
39:11
happens 19:16 35:20
Harris 1:4 41:16 47:4
headquartered 8:5
G
heard 17:24 35:4
G 33:16
held 23:4,16
gaps 10:1
helps 10:12
Gardner 15:11
Henrietta 37:16,22
general 15:9 18:20
hereto 1:20
18:22 39:14 40:4
high 35:9
generally 31:25 32:3 highly 15:12
32:17
historically 11:2
generals 39:18
hold 16:10,25
General's 39:17
holder 20:20,23 21:7
give 18:4 31:23 32:16
21:17 23:10 24:4
34:14,16
38:5
given 46:15 47:17
holding 21:8,11
48:3
22:16,19,20 25:7,9
gives 7:22 8:2
34:13
giving 45:2
home 6:12 25:14
go 7:14 15:15 18:24
home-based 6:13
19:2,12 20:5 22:24 hour 36:12,19
36:1 41:18
hourly 36:14,18
going 7:9,14 16:12,14 hours 15:15
18:2 40:11
Housing 18:21 40:5
good 18:22
Houston 1:19 2:5,10
governed 27:1
49:19,20
governing 31:9
Hughes 1:18 2:3,4
government 8:12
3:4 12:21,24 13:1,3
39:7
15:24 16:10,12 17:3
governmental 39:6
20:24 21:20 22:9,23
governs 21:23 31:7
26:14 34:17 35:22
32:5
35:25 36:4,9,22

op
y

filed 40:14 43:4


49:11
files 35:8
fill 10:1
finance 10:3 14:11
33:11 40:5
financially 48:12
financing 9:22 17:11
find 19:14,16
firm 36:11 49:18
first 4:2 7:17 13:3
19:10 20:17,17
31:15 37:15
firsthand 12:1
fits 10:11
five 6:20 8:20
fixed/adjustable
25:15
flow 43:1
focused 10:2
follow 43:1
following 47:14 48:5
follows 4:2 47:25
foreclosed 37:23
38:19
foreclosure 14:21
17:6,7 37:5,25 38:2
38:4 39:8 42:12
foreclosures 38:22
foreclosure-related
17:9,15
foregoing 46:1,13
forensic 4:10 9:5,10
9:17,18,20 10:5,21
10:22,24 11:1,9,10
11:15,15,20,20
forensics 17:6,8
forged 16:5,18,22,23
form 15:24 16:13
17:3 20:24 21:20
22:9,23 26:14 34:17
35:22
formal 16:23
formalized 12:10,12
formed 7:5
forth 10:1 41:21

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
5
look 10:9 18:7 20:16
26:19 33:14,15
41:10
looked 41:17
looking 7:14,17 9:24
11:2,3,5 12:15 17:4
17:22 18:8,13 33:23
looks 20:8
lot 6:16 17:24 19:20
35:20
LP 30:5,8,11 32:23

nie

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

mean 9:19 10:5 17:7


17:9,25 22:12 24:10
24:17 25:10 26:2
27:5 33:15 34:9,10
34:13,15,19 40:18
meaning 22:15
means 7:23 11:2 22:8
26:5
mechanics 14:8
member 40:22 42:18
members 8:10,23
40:19
M
Mendy 1:17 47:12
M 4:4 37:1
48:20 49:15
Mac 40:6
Merrimac 4:17,18
machine 1:18
metropolitans 41:21
Mae 37:17 40:6
minor 4:25 5:6
maintain 13:24
minute 16:10
maintained 23:5
misrepresentations
maintaining 25:1
19:15,22
major 4:22 5:2,5
missing 10:1,10,12
manufacturer 6:21
11:7
manufacturers 6:18 moment 5:24 18:2
manufacturing 6:15
22:25 24:13,21 25:6
Marie 1:12,15 3:2 4:1
41:3
4:7 7:5 45:25 46:1,6 mortgage 1:6 4:10
46:11 47:10,15
7:8 9:5,9 11:4 19:8
marked 4:3 7:9
19:9 23:14,23 26:21
married 6:11
27:25 28:12,17,20
MARY 1:2 47:3
28:22 29:3,5,18,19
Massachusetts 4:19
29:20,23,24 30:4,6
5:14 14:1,21 15:1,7
30:8,9,12,13,15,19
15:19 37:14,20
31:1 32:18,20,25
38:12
33:3,4,6,7,19,23
master 25:3 27:24
34:23 35:9 37:17,23
masters 14:16
38:3,5 40:9 41:5,8
material 19:16 42:17
41:14 43:17,19 47:6
materials 8:8
mortgages 14:12
math 5:3
41:1 42:4
matters 39:19,19
mortgage-backed
Max 15:10
17:13
McDonnell 1:12,15
mortgage-related
3:2,8,10 4:1,3,7,9
19:7 25:2
7:6 36:5 45:25 46:1 mouth 10:18
46:6,11 47:10,15
Mutual 15:20
McKinney 2:9
M-C-D-O-N-N-E-...

Un
of

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

legal 13:23 47:22


49:18
legally 26:6
legislation 23:3
lender 25:18 29:2,8
lenders 35:6
letters 8:22
let's 9:16 18:7 20:5,5
20:16,16 26:19
29:11 33:14,15 36:1
37:11
level 11:24 14:19
37:15 38:13
license 5:13 6:1 7:2
13:25
licensed 6:21
licenses 5:11
lien 43:4,10,14
line 10:12 45:2
lines 19:10
J
links 27:18
JAMES 2:9
list 20:2 32:11 37:10
January 6:2
42:21
job 28:12 35:8 46:25 listed 20:6
49:22
Listserv 12:7
judge 38:1,21
litigation 21:2 25:4
Judicial 1:8 37:21
37:4
47:8
little 7:15 8:2 12:11
jury 37:8
living 4:9
LLC 27:23 30:6,14
K
30:18 32:25
keep 16:14,14
LLP 1:18 2:4
know 19:21,21 21:1,8 loan 1:6 23:14,23
22:7,19 24:23,24
25:17 26:21 28:17
25:6 27:9,13 31:13
29:2,19,20,24 30:4
31:13,15 38:23
30:6,9,12,13,15,19
knowledge 9:1 12:1
31:1 32:18,20,25
24:22 26:17 35:2
33:3,4,7,19,23
known 28:16 46:11
34:24 35:9 43:19
47:7
L
loans 28:12,20,23
language 26:13
30:8 33:6 38:18
late 7:2
41:5,8,14 42:25
law 15:23 16:1
located 41:16
laws 27:1
long 11:10 32:11
lawsuits 37:3
37:10
layman's 31:24
investigation 39:8
investigations 8:9
investment 14:5
investor 7:3
investors 28:25
involve 41:16
involved 8:9 32:10
37:3,22 38:17 39:17
41:6
involvement 37:8
irreplaceable 12:1
issue 40:14 42:17
43:6
issues 13:13 40:9
42:22
issuing 28:16,19,24
33:12
Item 7:17 9:4 17:4,22
18:13

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
6

4:8

34:20 35:1,20
opinions 20:3,7,12
N
26:10
N 2:1 4:4,4 37:1,1
options 14:13
name 4:6,7 29:24
oral 1:11,15 47:10,16
46:12
order 14:1 23:24
O
named 28:17
24:24 26:20 29:19
naming 22:14
O 4:4 15:10 37:1
29:22
national 5:20 14:4,7 Oak 1:19 2:4
organized 32:12
14:19 15:8 21:14
oath 46:11
organizes 28:14,15
23:2 30:25 33:22
object 16:12
original 21:17 22:19
34:22 35:12,14
Objection 15:24 17:3
22:20 23:4 24:8,12
37:16
20:24 21:20 22:9,23
25:7 34:21 35:9
nationally 15:11
26:14 34:17 35:22
49:2,6,8
nature 5:12
obtained 7:1
originated 35:7
NC 29:25 30:3 32:22 occur 29:15
originator 29:6,10
necessary 23:21
occurred 48:16
outcome 48:13
negotiable 22:13 25:1 October 1:13,17
overturned 38:21
negotiate 22:18 25:10
47:11 48:17 49:12
owned 38:4
26:1
offered 14:25 39:5
owner 20:19,22 24:4
negotiated 23:20
offering 14:14
38:5
neither 48:9
office 18:20 39:17
P
never 24:2 26:22
40:4,8 43:5 46:15
33:19 34:5,5,5,6,21 officer 19:6 47:16
P 2:1,1
New 27:2,25 29:2,5
48:4 49:2
page 3:3,8 7:17 17:22
29:18,22 39:16
officer's 49:7
18:6,11 20:5,18
43:17
offices 1:18
26:20 33:4,15 45:2
North 4:19 49:19
OIG's 40:8
45:3 49:4
Nos 4:3
okay 8:1 11:13 12:23 page(s) 46:2
Notary 46:2,18
12:25 13:5 15:22
PAGE/LINE 45:4
note 11:4,5,6 20:20
16:11,15,16 20:21
paid 26:5 36:6,12
20:23 21:7,9,11,17
23:11 24:6 28:7
paper 22:15 34:13
22:1,2,16,20,21
29:1 33:17 36:10
45:2
23:10,19 24:5,8,12
37:7,12 38:7,10,16 Paragraph 25:16
24:22 25:7,9,11,15
38:23 39:5,10,12,20 part 10:20 12:17
25:18,20,21,25 26:1
39:25 40:13,17,22
27:17
29:15,21 33:24 34:4
41:7,25 42:13 43:24 particular 10:11 11:4
34:4,21 38:3,6
omissions 19:15
21:24 29:12,12 31:7
43:16
ones 14:25
33:6,8
noted 46:2
one-day 39:15
parties 23:21 27:1,5
noteholder 25:20,22 ongoing 12:9
27:7,13 32:14 33:5
number 13:25 14:8
on-the-job 11:21
48:5,10 49:11
14:10,20 15:17
opinion 20:8,17,22
party 27:9,11 30:2,7
39:14 42:14 45:2,2
21:6,10,13,16 23:9
32:23 38:4 47:24
numbered 1:16
24:9,20 26:8,9,20
pass 43:24
numbers 41:23
27:6 33:16 34:3,16 pass-through 1:7

28:11 43:20 47:8


pay 25:17
payee 22:14
payments 25:19 26:5
28:22
peers 35:6
people 8:14
percent 11:18
percentage 11:13
performed 19:24
person 34:14 46:12
personal 24:22
personally 46:11
PETER 2:8 48:7 49:6
49:8
Philippines 6:20
phonetic 39:2
physical 22:20 24:22
25:24 30:21 34:4
35:16
physically 21:8,11
22:16,20 24:7,12,19
25:7,9 33:19 34:9
34:11,15 35:8,11
piece 34:13
pieces 11:7,7
Pkwy 49:19
plaintiff 20:14
plaintiffs 2:2 20:20
20:23 21:7 23:10
24:4 26:21 33:19
40:17,18 42:2,10,19
43:7,10 48:7
play 10:23 35:3
played 38:12
please 4:6 13:8,10
37:7 39:10 41:3
45:2,3
point 11:17
political 4:24 5:3,6
pooling 21:23 23:23
24:25 26:24 27:7,10
27:11,14,16,19 28:8
29:12 30:16,23 31:2
31:6,11,16,21,24
32:1,3,7

Un
of

fic

ial

C

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

numerous 42:8
N.A 1:5 20:19 23:9
23:13 24:12 26:23
27:24 33:20 34:10
43:18 47:6

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
7

O

ffic

e

of

C

R 2:1
rate 25:15 36:14,18
reached 20:7
read 1:20 13:9,9,11
25:21 26:13 35:4
46:1
reading 31:15,17
34:3
reads 20:18 26:21
real 5:13,18 6:3,9,24
7:1,3,3,6 8:14 9:22
9:22 10:3,3,18

Reporter 47:13
REPORTER'S 3:6
47:10
representatives 6:19
representing 6:19
request 25:4 40:4
requested 3:5 13:11
require 8:19 24:25
required 6:17 8:25
23:22 30:24 42:24
requirement 13:24
requirements 21:22
48:14
research 17:12,18
19:12 26:16 41:4
residents 41:8 42:4
respect 42:11,24
response 13:1,4
responsible 23:15
30:1,7 32:23
retained 36:8,9,11
return 47:22
returned 49:2,4,6
Revenue 33:13
review 13:15 18:18
19:25 26:18
reviewed 20:2 22:5
23:19
reviewing 17:9 36:16
right 8:5 9:16 13:2,12
18:14 19:2 20:5,16
22:3,7 25:9,10,25
26:2,4,12 29:4
33:14,25 36:20
39:20 41:11 42:8
rights 25:23 28:21
43:22
robo-signer 19:1,18
19:24
robo-signing 17:23
18:1,5,15,23
role 28:7 37:18 38:13
roles 32:9
room 35:25 36:2,4
RPR 1:17
Rule 48:15 49:1,10

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

lD

nie

Da

hr

Q
qualified 28:15
qualifier 11:24
qualifying 13:23
33:11
question 10:4 12:3
13:7,8,10 16:13
questions 7:15 36:21
36:23 42:9 44:1
quite 8:13 32:11
quote 33:9

C

ial

fic

Un
of

11:11 13:18,20,21
13:22 14:6,8,10,13
16:7 17:10 41:16
realm 24:10
realtor 5:20 14:2,18
Realtors 5:21 14:1,5
reason 45:2,4
reasons 49:4
recall 5:24 41:1
receivables 28:22
receive 8:16 25:19
26:4 35:15
received 8:17 25:17
recommendation
8:22
reconstruct 10:12
11:8
record 1:20 23:18
36:1 47:17 48:6
recorded 1:18
record's 18:10
refer 18:3 29:6
reference 20:13
referred 37:18 38:11
referring 43:11
refers 29:21
regarded 15:12
regardless 25:8
Registration 49:18
regulates 40:6
regulation 15:18
relate 17:10 41:8
related 13:19,20
48:10
relates 11:5
relating 37:4
release 25:5
removed 20:13
renowned 15:11
repeat 13:8
repeatedly 19:17
report 3:10 12:17,18
17:21 18:3,4,8 20:2
20:9,12,14 27:15,17
29:20 31:22 32:2
33:3 43:13

is

provides 8:7
provisions 1:20 25:14
psmart@craincato...
2:11
Public 46:3,18
purchase 23:23 28:12
30:4,6,9,15 31:2
32:18,20,21 33:1,3
33:4
purchaser 30:14
32:25
purports 43:21
purposes 23:3 29:8
29:25 30:9 46:14
pursuant 1:19 48:3
48:14
put 10:17 20:8
putting 11:6
P.C 2:9
p.m 1:17

op
y

portion 13:11
position 39:6
possess 24:17,19
possesses 24:12
possession 24:8 25:25
34:6 35:17
possibility 24:11,16
possible 19:23
Post 1:19 2:4
postgraduate 5:9
practice 7:5 9:21
10:2 11:14 12:7
13:16 18:16
precisely 32:8
preparing 49:8
presented 14:23
26:18
previous 46:2
primary 11:23 31:3
print 12:19
private 14:12
probability 35:10
probably 35:21
problem 23:17
Procedure 1:19
proceeding 48:11
process 12:10 17:20
28:9 31:4 35:5
42:12
produced 1:15 12:22
product 6:19
professional 5:12
8:22 11:14
professionally 6:7
professionals 8:13
promise 25:16
proper 38:2
properly 23:20 26:6
37:25
property 41:9,16
proposed 40:14,23
42:3,10,14,18 43:6
proposes 43:15
prove 26:4
proved 46:11
provide 40:2

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
8

lD

nie

is

hr

C

of

e

ffic

O

op
y

C

ial

fic

Un
of

stem 40:19
stop 39:20
strict 26:24
structured 33:10
studying 31:17
styled 37:16
subject 21:2 31:17
subjects 31:19
submit 39:23
submitted 47:19
subscribe 17:13
subscribed 46:13
Suite 1:19 2:4,9
49:19
summarize 23:8
superior 37:15
support 41:19 47:22
49:18
supposed 29:16
Supreme 37:20
sure 15:5 19:4 32:19
36:24
suspect 25:3
sworn 1:16 4:2 47:15

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

17:4 21:4,25 22:12


23:7 26:19 34:20
36:1,5 44:1 48:2,7
49:6,8
sold 28:25 30:12
sort 31:23 32:16
sorting 41:20
sounds 10:18 24:6
35:18 41:11
speak 15:17
speaker 14:24
speaking 31:18,25
32:3,17
special 39:18 40:2,12
specialized 8:7 26:16
31:19 35:2
special-purpose
28:10,15
specific 12:4
specifically 13:20
22:3
spelled 4:7
spoken 35:6
sponsor 28:13 30:10
30:12 32:24
spot 16:8
staff 39:16
stage 37:24
Stanwich 27:22 30:5
30:13,17 32:24
start 6:24 37:11
started 5:1 6:9,13
38:18
state 1:18 8:12 14:19
15:8 27:1 37:15
38:1 39:16 41:21
46:8,19 47:13
stated 1:20
statement 35:10
statements 19:15
states 6:18 18:21
30:7 39:14
statical 41:21
statistics 41:18
status 33:12
stay-at-home 6:12

Da

32:24
selling 14:11
seminars 15:2,3
S
sentence 9:4
S 2:1 46:8
separation 38:3
sale 28:13 32:21
Series 1:6 23:14
33:10
28:17 43:19 47:7
salesperson's 7:1
served 30:20 49:11
Sam 49:19
serves 28:11
sampling 5:22
servicer 18:16 27:24
saying 24:6,18,18
28:1,2
34:4,7 41:22
services 36:6
says 25:18
servicing 11:6 21:23
schedule 33:7
23:24 24:25 26:24
Schneider 1:17 47:12
27:8,10,12,14,17,20
48:20 49:15
28:8 29:13 30:16,23
science 4:24 5:3,4,6
31:2,6,11,16,22,25
10:24
32:1,3,7 37:23 40:9
seal 46:15
serving 23:13
section 32:2
session 15:6 40:2
sections 32:12
sessions 15:15
securities 17:13 30:5 settlement 15:8
30:8,11 32:23
seven 6:13 20:6
securitization 21:24 shared 42:18 43:6
23:22 28:9 29:9
sheet 45:2
30:1 31:4,7,9,20
shorthand 1:18 47:12
32:10,15 33:8 38:20 show 7:9
38:24 39:3 41:6
shown 49:11
42:11
shows 23:17
securitize 24:24
side 11:1
42:25
sign 45:3
securitized 29:22
signature 3:5 16:4,5
34:24 38:18
45:1 46:1 47:21
security 23:19 25:2
49:4
25:12,22 29:21
signatures 16:7,18,22
43:16
16:24
see 7:19 17:5,23 27:3 signed 1:20 7:11,12
32:14 33:18
25:16
seeing 15:5
signing 18:17 19:6,20
seeking 42:3
19:20 46:2
seen 18:23 21:25 22:2 single 42:25
self-study 12:9
site 27:18
sell 26:1 29:23 30:7
size 42:13
30:13 33:6
slated 33:8
sellers 28:13
SMART 2:8 3:3 4:5
seller's 30:10,12
13:5,6,9,18 16:2,19
ruled 38:1
rules 1:19 32:14

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

T
T 4:4 37:1 46:8
take 8:24
taken 1:16 12:4
13:13,16,21,25 14:5
14:10,12,15,18,20
14:24 15:10,14,16
15:18 23:1 48:5,12
takes 25:18
talk 8:2 9:16 12:11
29:11
talked 31:1
talking 33:24
tax 33:12
TBA 49:8
techniques 9:2
tell 17:25 19:2 29:14
term 29:20
terminal 41:19
terms 5:24 10:4
18:25 24:25 32:11

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
9
9:2 12:5 13:16
14:16,18 15:18
17:12,19 31:17
32:12,14 40:12
vault 23:5
verification 18:18
verify 41:22
versus 37:16
VS 1:4 47:4

O

ffic

e

of

C

hr

is

Da

nie

lD

W
W 2:3 48:7
want 10:17
way 16:19 29:11
weeks 6:20
Wells 1:5 20:19 23:9
23:12 24:3,7,11
25:24 26:23 27:23
30:19,22 33:20
34:10,21 35:11
40:20,23 43:18,23
47:5
we're 7:14 18:10
38:23
we've 12:21,21 28:1,1
28:2
witness 1:16 3:2
12:23,25 13:2 16:11
U
16:16 36:24 43:25
uh-huh 6:11 9:7
45:1 47:15,18,20,21
39:21 41:13
Wolf 1:2,3 29:19
ultimate 29:15
40:13 47:3,3
ultimately 21:2 29:16 Wolfs 23:19 25:15
understand 9:25
27:9 40:18 43:12
10:13,15
word 17:5,23,23 27:5
understanding 9:22
words 10:17,22 31:23
11:8 14:11
work 6:3,15 8:14
Uniform 22:17
11:24
United 6:18 18:21
worked 6:21
Urban 18:21
working 6:9,24 8:21
U.S 47:22 49:18
11:15
wrong 35:18
V
wrongful 37:4 38:22
varied 8:13
39:8
variety 40:3
X
various 6:17 8:12 9:1

C

ial

fic

Un
of

X 4:4 37:1 46:8


Y
year 7:2
years 6:13 8:20 11:12
11:23 31:16 39:15
year's 7:4
yesterday 40:7
York 27:2 39:16

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

trial 35:4 38:13,21


true 28:13 33:10 41:7
46:2 47:17
trust 1:6 20:20 21:14
23:2,14,16,25 24:2
24:5 26:7,22 28:5
28:17,23 29:12
30:19,25 32:5,5
33:21,22,25 34:22
35:12,15 38:20,24
39:3 41:2,2,15 42:5
42:6 43:19 47:7
trustee 1:5 23:13,14
26:23 27:23 28:4,5
30:20,22 33:21
35:11,16 43:19,23
47:6
trustees 38:19
truthful 17:17 19:11
two 9:8,11,14 15:14
15:16 31:3 38:20
42:22
two-day 15:2
two-hour 15:6
TX 49:20
type 35:7 39:6,23
types 9:24

op
y

testified 4:2
testimony 35:4 47:17
48:4
Texas 1:4,18,19,19
2:5,10 8:5 25:14
41:8,9,16 42:4
46:19 47:4,13
therefor 49:5
thing 9:12 23:3
things 6:5,6 7:16 9:3
9:11,14
think 7:10 8:17 18:8
20:6,9,12 21:1
33:18 35:24 41:3
third 26:19
thousands 42:15
three 6:11 8:22 38:18
38:20
three-day 40:2
time 6:3,8,8 10:11
11:18 24:21 27:24
34:23 35:20,21
47:24 48:4
title 24:1
tools 17:19
touched 34:5
trade 5:25
training 8:7 11:21
12:4,10,12 15:15
16:21,23 26:17
31:19 39:16,17 40:2
40:11
transaction 10:8,13
17:11 19:13 33:9,11
transactions 9:23
10:19 11:11 35:7
transcript 47:16,19
49:9
transfer 25:19 29:14
34:11,15 35:17 43:4
43:10,14,21
transferred 23:21
26:6,22 30:22 33:20
34:9 41:2,15 42:5
travel 6:17
TRCP 48:15 49:1

U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON


713-653-7100

ZIP 41:20
$
$395 36:19
$400,000 25:17
0
00:11:25 48:1
00784989 49:8
01:00:49 48:2
1
1 3:8 4:3 7:10 17:5
25:16 26:25
1-133489 46:25 49:22
10:09 36:3
10:16 36:3
10:28 1:17 44:2
1120 1:19 2:4
12 15:15
12-31-12 48:21 49:15
122 49:18
1401 2:9
151ST 1:8 47:8
17 33:4
1700 2:9
1970 4:15 6:11
1981 6:20
1986 7:2
1988 6:2 7:7
1991 7:7
2
2 1:13,17 3:10 4:3
7:17 9:4 17:22 18:7
18:13 47:11

MARIE MCDONNELL

10/2/2012
10

2006 15:14 26:25


42:6
2006-NC3 1:7 23:14
26:22 28:18 33:21
41:2 43:20 47:7
2011-36476 1:1 47:1
2012 1:13,17 46:15
47:11,20,23 48:17
49:3,12
203 48:15 49:1
203.3 49:10
233 41:14
24 18:6,11
25 11:12,22
2700 1:19 2:4

8
88 6:4
888 2:5

lD

ist
ric
tC
ler
k

9
9th 48:17 49:12
9:10 1:17
900 49:19

nie

hr

is

Da

3 22:16
350-3931 2:5
363 49:19
37 3:4

op
y

O

ffic

e

of

C

4
4 3:3,8,10 20:5,18
26:20 33:15
42 18:13
46 3:5
47 3:6
49 15:8
5

Un
of

fic

6
658-2323 2:10

ial

C

5 17:4
571 41:7

7
7 17:22
7,548 41:5
70 6:4
713 2:10
713/653-7100 49:20
77010 2:10
77056 2:5
77060-4001 49:20
7761 48:20 49:15
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT - HOUSTON
713-653-7100

Você também pode gostar